Gauge-Engineered Tunable Mode Selection in Non-Hermitian Directed-Graph Networks

Wenwen Liu; Zhang Shuang

arxiv: 2605.15863 · v1 · pith:F4263EZLnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Gauge-Engineered Tunable Mode Selection in Non-Hermitian Directed-Graph Networks

Wenwen Liu , Zhang Shuang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 18:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics

keywords non-Hermitian physicsdirected graphssynthetic gauge fieldsmode selectionpure decay modesnon-reciprocal hoppingopen quantum systems

0 comments

The pith

Synthetic gauge fields in directed-graph networks allow any pure decay mode to be selected as the dominant one while preserving its amplitude profile.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that non-Hermitian directed-graph networks support geometry-protected pure decay modes, which are eigenstates showing smooth exponential amplitude decay along directed paths. Adding synthetic gauge fields through phase-compensated non-reciprocal hopping promotes any chosen such mode to the dominant position without altering its amplitude profile. In fully connected setups this creates a single mode with a large tunable gap from the others, and the approach extends to paired modes or multi-mode patterns in other configurations. A sympathetic reader would care because the method supplies robust mode control in open systems without the usual delicate gain-loss adjustments, pointing toward simpler designs for lasers, sensors, and quantum devices.

Core claim

In directed-graph networks that inherently support geometry-protected pure decay modes, the application of synthetic gauge fields through phase-compensated non-reciprocal hopping promotes any chosen pure decay mode to the dominant position while leaving its amplitude profile unchanged. Fully connected configurations naturally feature a single dominant mode with a large tunable energy gap. The method further allows simultaneous selection of paired modes in half-connected graphs and customizable multi-mode distributions in higher dimensions using orthogonal folding.

What carries the argument

Synthetic gauge fields added via phase-compensated non-reciprocal hopping, which shifts mode dominance in the directed graph without modifying the amplitude profiles of the geometry-protected pure decay modes.

Load-bearing premise

Directed-graph networks inherently support geometry-protected pure decay modes whose amplitude profiles remain unchanged when synthetic gauge fields are applied through phase-compensated hopping.

What would settle it

If applying phase-compensated non-reciprocal hopping in a simulated or physical directed-graph network distorts the amplitude profile of the promoted pure decay mode, the preservation claim would be disproved.

read the original abstract

Non-Hermitian physics enables novel control over open quantum and wave systems, but selectively isolating individual modes without delicate balancing of gain and loss remains challenging. Here we introduce a gauge-engineering method in directed-graph networks that support geometry-protected pure decay modes-eigenstates exhibiting smooth exponential amplitude decay along directed paths. In fully connected configurations, a single dominant mode naturally emerges with a large, tunable energy gap from the rest. By adding synthetic gauge fields via phase-compensated non-reciprocal hopping, we can promote any desired pure decay mode to the dominant position, while preserving its amplitude profile. The approach extends to simultaneous selection of paired modes in half-connected graphs and customizable multi-mode distributions in higher dimensions via orthogonal folding. Our method enables robust, loss/gain-free control over mode profiles, advancing applications in single-mode lasers, sensors, and quantum processing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper proposes using phases on non-reciprocal hoppings to promote any chosen pure decay mode to dominance in directed-graph non-Hermitian networks while claiming to keep its amplitude profile fixed.

read the letter

The core idea is a gauge-engineering trick: add synthetic gauge fields through phase-compensated non-reciprocal terms so that a target geometry-protected decay mode becomes the one with the largest modulus eigenvalue, without introducing gain or loss. In fully connected graphs a natural dominant mode already exists, and the method extends to selecting pairs in half-connected cases or custom distributions via orthogonal folding in higher dimensions. That extension to tunable selection across graph types is the clearest new element, and it sits on top of existing work on directed networks that support smooth exponential decay along paths. If the construction works, it removes the need for delicate gain-loss balancing, which matters for applications like single-mode lasers or sensors. The abstract presents the concept in straightforward terms and gives credit to the underlying geometry protection, which is fair. The approach looks like a practical engineering addition rather than a redefinition of the system. The soft spot is exactly the profile-preservation step flagged in the stress-test note. For the modified operator to keep the chosen vector as an eigenvector while shifting only its eigenvalue to the top, the phases must act without mixing in other decay channels. Graphs with cycles or multiple paths make this non-obvious, and the description supplies no explicit construction, similarity transformation, or numerical check showing that arbitrary modes can be isolated this way. Without that, the claim rests on the assumption that such phases always exist and leave the amplitude unchanged. The paper would be useful to readers working on non-Hermitian photonics, topological graphs, or open-system mode control who want ideas for loss-free tuning. It is not yet at the level of a finished result but shows clear thinking about a concrete problem in the literature. I would send it to a serious referee so the construction can be checked against explicit examples or proofs.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a gauge-engineering method in non-Hermitian directed-graph networks that support geometry-protected pure decay modes. By incorporating synthetic gauge fields through phase-compensated non-reciprocal hopping, the approach claims to promote any desired pure decay mode to the dominant position while preserving its amplitude profile. Extensions are discussed for fully connected graphs (natural dominant mode with tunable gap), half-connected graphs (paired-mode selection), and higher-dimensional configurations via orthogonal folding, enabling robust mode control without explicit gain/loss balancing.

Significance. If the central construction can be shown to hold with explicit phase choices that preserve eigenvectors and reorder the spectrum for arbitrary directed graphs, the work would provide a useful engineering tool for selective mode isolation in open quantum and wave systems. It leverages geometric protection in directed graphs and adds a tunable gauge layer, with potential relevance to single-mode lasers, sensors, and quantum processing. No machine-checked proofs or reproducible code are mentioned.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract and main construction: the claim that phase-compensated non-reciprocal hopping promotes any chosen pure decay mode while exactly preserving its amplitude profile lacks an explicit general construction or existence argument. It is unclear whether the modified operator (directed adjacency plus phases) can always be arranged to leave the target vector invariant yet make its eigenvalue dominant in modulus, particularly when the graph contains cycles or multiple overlapping paths that could induce mixing.
[Main text] The manuscript provides no equations, derivations, or numerical examples demonstrating that the phase factors act without inadvertently altering the target profile or failing to suppress competing modes. This absence is load-bearing for the tunable selection claim across different graph connectivities.

minor comments (1)

The abstract is dense; a brief schematic of the directed-graph topologies and the phase-compensation rule would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments identify areas where additional explicit constructions and demonstrations would strengthen the presentation of the gauge-engineering approach. We address each major comment below and have prepared revisions to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and main construction: the claim that phase-compensated non-reciprocal hopping promotes any chosen pure decay mode while exactly preserving its amplitude profile lacks an explicit general construction or existence argument. It is unclear whether the modified operator (directed adjacency plus phases) can always be arranged to leave the target vector invariant yet make its eigenvalue dominant in modulus, particularly when the graph contains cycles or multiple overlapping paths that could induce mixing.

Authors: We agree that an explicit general construction strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we add a systematic procedure in the main text: for a target pure-decay eigenvector v with components v_i, the phase factors φ_{ij} on each directed edge are chosen so that the modified non-reciprocal term satisfies (A' v)_i = λ v_i with |λ| strictly larger than all other eigenvalues. The phases compensate the directed-path decay factors exactly, leaving the amplitude profile invariant by construction. For graphs containing cycles we show that consistent phase assignment along all overlapping paths is always possible because the underlying directed structure preserves the geometric protection; the resulting operator remains upper-triangular in the appropriate basis, preventing mixing. A concise existence argument and the explicit phase-selection rule are now included. revision: yes
Referee: [Main text] The manuscript provides no equations, derivations, or numerical examples demonstrating that the phase factors act without inadvertently altering the target profile or failing to suppress competing modes. This absence is load-bearing for the tunable selection claim across different graph connectivities.

Authors: We accept that the original submission would benefit from explicit derivations and examples. The revised manuscript now contains: (i) the full matrix form of the gauge-modified operator together with the algebraic verification that A' v = λ v for the chosen v; (ii) a derivation showing that the modulus of λ is maximized by the phase choice while all other eigenvalues remain smaller; and (iii) numerical spectra and eigenvector plots for fully-connected, half-connected, and orthogonally folded graphs, including examples with cycles. These additions demonstrate that the target profile is preserved and competing modes are suppressed for the connectivities discussed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; method presented as external engineering addition

full rationale

The derivation introduces synthetic gauge fields via phase-compensated non-reciprocal hopping as an explicit construction added to pre-existing directed-graph networks that already support geometry-protected pure decay modes. The claim that amplitude profiles are preserved while promoting a chosen mode is stated as a result of this addition rather than defined into the input or recovered by fitting a parameter to the target output. No equations reduce the promoted mode or its dominance to a tautological re-expression of the original adjacency matrix, and no load-bearing step relies on a self-citation whose content is itself unverified within the paper. The approach is therefore self-contained against the stated graph structures and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of geometry-protected pure decay modes and the ability of phase-compensated hopping to act as tunable gauge fields without profile distortion; these are domain assumptions without independent evidence provided in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Directed-graph networks support geometry-protected pure decay modes with smooth exponential amplitude decay along directed paths
Invoked as the foundation for mode selection in the abstract description of the networks.

invented entities (1)

synthetic gauge fields via phase-compensated non-reciprocal hopping no independent evidence
purpose: To promote any desired pure decay mode to dominant position while preserving amplitude profile
Introduced as the core engineering tool for tunable selection

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5674 in / 1196 out tokens · 45173 ms · 2026-05-20T18:57:01.705898+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

[1]

S.B. Carl M. Bender, Real Spectra in Non - Hermitian Hamiltonians Having PPTT Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, (1998)

work page 1998
[2]

Bender, Making sense of non -Hermitian Hamiltonians, Rep

C.M. Bender, Making sense of non -Hermitian Hamiltonians, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 947-1018 (2007)

work page 2007
[3]

S. Yao, Z. Wang, Edge States and Topological Invariants of Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018)

work page 2018
[4]

Yokomizo, S

K. Yokomizo, S. Murakami, Non -Bloch Band Theory of Non -Hermitian Systems, Phys . Rev. Lett. 123, 066404 (2019)

work page 2019
[5]

Bender, D.C

C.M. Bender, D.C. Brody, H.F. Jones, Complex Extension of Quantum Mechanics, Phys . Rev. Lett. 89, 270401 (2002)

work page 2002
[6]

Bai, T.R

K. Bai, T.R. Liu, L. Fang, J.Z. Li, C. Lin, D. Wan, M. Xiao, Observation of Nonlinear Exceptional Points with a Complete Basis in Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 073802 (2024)

work page 2024
[7]

M.A. Miri, A. Alu, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, 6422 (2019)

work page 2019
[8]

Ozdemir, S

S.K. Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, L. Yang, Parity - time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nat . Mater. 18, 783-798 (2019)

work page 2019
[9]

K. Ding, C. Fang, G. Ma, Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries, Nat . Rev. Phys. 4, 745- 760 (2022)

work page 2022
[10]

Mao Wenbo, Li Yihang, Li Fu, Yang Lan, Exceptional–point–enhanced phase sensing, Sci

F.Z. Mao Wenbo, Li Yihang, Li Fu, Yang Lan, Exceptional–point–enhanced phase sensing, Sci . Adv. 10, eadl5037 (2024)

work page 2024
[11]

W. Chen, S. Kaya Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature 548, 192-196 (2017)

work page 2017
[12]

L. Li, C.H. Lee, S. Mu, J. Gong, Critical non - Hermitian skin effect, Nat. Commun. 11, 5491 (2020)

work page 2020
[13]

W. Liu, J. Wu, L. Zhang, O. You, Y . Tian, H. Chen, B. Min, Y . Yang, S. Zhang, Quantized Decay Charges in Non-Hermitian Networks Characterized by Directed Graphs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 206602 (2025)

work page 2025
[14]

Cheng, X

J. Cheng, X. Zhang, M. -H. Lu, Y . -F. Chen, Competition between band topology and non -Hermiticity, Phys. Rev. B 105, (2022)

work page 2022
[15]

T. Dai, Y . Ao, J. Mao, Y . Yang, Y . Zheng, C. Zhai, Y . Li, J. Y uan, B. Tang, Z. Li, J. Luo, W. Wang, X. Hu, Q. Gong, J. Wang, Non-Hermitian topological phase transitions controlled by nonlinearity, Nat. Phys. 20, 101-108 (2024)

work page 2024
[16]

Tang, S.S

M.Y . Tang, S.S. Sui, Y .D. Yang, J.L. Xiao, Y . Du, Y .Z. Huang, Mode selection in square resonator microlasers for widely tunable single mode lasing, Opt . Express 23, 27739-27750 (2015)

work page 2015
[17]

Naidoo, I.A

D. Naidoo, I.A. Litvin, A. Forbes, Brightness enhancement in a solid-state laser by mode transformation, Optica 5, (2018)

work page 2018
[18]

Yoshida, M

M. Yoshida, M. De Zoysa, K. Ishizaki, Y . Tanaka, M. Kawasaki, R. Hatsuda, B. Song, J. Gelleta, S. Noda, Double-lattice photonic -crystal resonators enabling high - brightness semiconductor lasers with symmetric narrow - divergence beams, Nat. Mater 18, 121-128 (2019)

work page 2019
[19]

H.-S. Chu, E. -P. Li, P. Bai, R. Hegde, Optical performance of single -mode hybrid dielectric -loaded plasmonic waveguide-based components, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, (2010)

work page 2010
[20]

Z. Deng, L. Li, J. Zhang, J. Yao, Single -mode narrow-linewidth fiber ring laser with SBS -assisted parity- time symmetry for mode selection, Opt Express 30, 20809- 20819 (2022)

work page 2022
[21]

M.J. Miah, T. Kettler, K. Posilovic, V .P. Kalosha, D. Skoczowsky, R. Rosales, D. Bimberg, J. Pohl, M. Weyers, 1.9 W continuous -wave single transverse mode emission from 1060 nm edge-emitting lasers with vertically extended lasing area, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, (2014)

work page 2014
[22]

Hodaei, M.A

H. Hodaei, M.A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D.N. Christodoulides, M. Khajavikhan, Parity -time-symmetric microring lasers, Science 346, 975-978 (2014)

work page 2014
[23]

L. Feng, Z. Wang, R. Ma, Y . Wang, X. Zhang, Single-mode laser by parity -time symmetry breaking, Science 346, 972-975 (2014)

work page 2014
[24]

Hodaei, M.A

H. Hodaei, M.A. Miri, A.U. Hassan, W.E. Hayenga, M. Heinrich, D.N. Christodoulides, M. Khajavikhan, Single mode lasing in transversely multi‐moded PT‐symmetric microring resonators, Laser & Photonics Rev . 10, 494-499 (2016)

work page 2016
[25]

Ishida, Y

N. Ishida, Y . Ota, W. Lin, T. Byrnes, Y . Arakawa, S. Iwamoto, A large-scale single-mode array laser based on a topological edge mode, Nanophotonics 11, 2169 -2181 (2022)

work page 2022
[26]

H. Zhao, P. Miao, M.H. Teimourpour, S. Malzard, R. El-Ganainy, H. Schomerus, L. Feng, Topological hybrid silicon microlasers, Nat. Commun. 9, 981 (2018)

work page 2018
[27]

Contractor, W

R. Contractor, W. Noh, W. Redjem, W. Qarony, E. Martin, S. Dhuey, A. Schwartzberg, B. Kante, Scalable single-mode surface -emitting laser via open -Dirac singularities, Nature 608, 692-698 (2022)

work page 2022
[28]

B. Zhu, Q. Wang, D. Leykam, H. Xue, Q.J. Wang, Y .D. Chong, Anomalous Single-Mode Lasing Induced by Nonlinearity and the Non-Hermitian Skin Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 013903 (2022)

work page 2022
[29]

Wong, S.S

S. Wong, S.S. Oh, Topological bulk lasing modes using an imaginary gauge field, Phys . Rev. Res. 3, 033042 (2021)

work page 2021
[30]

Longhi, Non-Hermitian gauged topological laser arrays, Ann

S. Longhi, Non-Hermitian gauged topological laser arrays, Ann. Phys. 530, (2018)

work page 2018
[31]

See Supplemental Material : Gauge-Engineered Tunable Mode Selection in Non-Hermitian Directed-Graph Networks for more details

work page

[1] [1]

S.B. Carl M. Bender, Real Spectra in Non - Hermitian Hamiltonians Having PPTT Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, (1998)

work page 1998

[2] [2]

Bender, Making sense of non -Hermitian Hamiltonians, Rep

C.M. Bender, Making sense of non -Hermitian Hamiltonians, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 947-1018 (2007)

work page 2007

[3] [3]

S. Yao, Z. Wang, Edge States and Topological Invariants of Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018)

work page 2018

[4] [4]

Yokomizo, S

K. Yokomizo, S. Murakami, Non -Bloch Band Theory of Non -Hermitian Systems, Phys . Rev. Lett. 123, 066404 (2019)

work page 2019

[5] [5]

Bender, D.C

C.M. Bender, D.C. Brody, H.F. Jones, Complex Extension of Quantum Mechanics, Phys . Rev. Lett. 89, 270401 (2002)

work page 2002

[6] [6]

Bai, T.R

K. Bai, T.R. Liu, L. Fang, J.Z. Li, C. Lin, D. Wan, M. Xiao, Observation of Nonlinear Exceptional Points with a Complete Basis in Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 073802 (2024)

work page 2024

[7] [7]

M.A. Miri, A. Alu, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, 6422 (2019)

work page 2019

[8] [8]

Ozdemir, S

S.K. Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, L. Yang, Parity - time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nat . Mater. 18, 783-798 (2019)

work page 2019

[9] [9]

K. Ding, C. Fang, G. Ma, Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries, Nat . Rev. Phys. 4, 745- 760 (2022)

work page 2022

[10] [10]

Mao Wenbo, Li Yihang, Li Fu, Yang Lan, Exceptional–point–enhanced phase sensing, Sci

F.Z. Mao Wenbo, Li Yihang, Li Fu, Yang Lan, Exceptional–point–enhanced phase sensing, Sci . Adv. 10, eadl5037 (2024)

work page 2024

[11] [11]

W. Chen, S. Kaya Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature 548, 192-196 (2017)

work page 2017

[12] [12]

L. Li, C.H. Lee, S. Mu, J. Gong, Critical non - Hermitian skin effect, Nat. Commun. 11, 5491 (2020)

work page 2020

[13] [13]

W. Liu, J. Wu, L. Zhang, O. You, Y . Tian, H. Chen, B. Min, Y . Yang, S. Zhang, Quantized Decay Charges in Non-Hermitian Networks Characterized by Directed Graphs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 206602 (2025)

work page 2025

[14] [14]

Cheng, X

J. Cheng, X. Zhang, M. -H. Lu, Y . -F. Chen, Competition between band topology and non -Hermiticity, Phys. Rev. B 105, (2022)

work page 2022

[15] [15]

T. Dai, Y . Ao, J. Mao, Y . Yang, Y . Zheng, C. Zhai, Y . Li, J. Y uan, B. Tang, Z. Li, J. Luo, W. Wang, X. Hu, Q. Gong, J. Wang, Non-Hermitian topological phase transitions controlled by nonlinearity, Nat. Phys. 20, 101-108 (2024)

work page 2024

[16] [16]

Tang, S.S

M.Y . Tang, S.S. Sui, Y .D. Yang, J.L. Xiao, Y . Du, Y .Z. Huang, Mode selection in square resonator microlasers for widely tunable single mode lasing, Opt . Express 23, 27739-27750 (2015)

work page 2015

[17] [17]

Naidoo, I.A

D. Naidoo, I.A. Litvin, A. Forbes, Brightness enhancement in a solid-state laser by mode transformation, Optica 5, (2018)

work page 2018

[18] [18]

Yoshida, M

M. Yoshida, M. De Zoysa, K. Ishizaki, Y . Tanaka, M. Kawasaki, R. Hatsuda, B. Song, J. Gelleta, S. Noda, Double-lattice photonic -crystal resonators enabling high - brightness semiconductor lasers with symmetric narrow - divergence beams, Nat. Mater 18, 121-128 (2019)

work page 2019

[19] [19]

H.-S. Chu, E. -P. Li, P. Bai, R. Hegde, Optical performance of single -mode hybrid dielectric -loaded plasmonic waveguide-based components, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, (2010)

work page 2010

[20] [20]

Z. Deng, L. Li, J. Zhang, J. Yao, Single -mode narrow-linewidth fiber ring laser with SBS -assisted parity- time symmetry for mode selection, Opt Express 30, 20809- 20819 (2022)

work page 2022

[21] [21]

M.J. Miah, T. Kettler, K. Posilovic, V .P. Kalosha, D. Skoczowsky, R. Rosales, D. Bimberg, J. Pohl, M. Weyers, 1.9 W continuous -wave single transverse mode emission from 1060 nm edge-emitting lasers with vertically extended lasing area, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, (2014)

work page 2014

[22] [22]

Hodaei, M.A

H. Hodaei, M.A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D.N. Christodoulides, M. Khajavikhan, Parity -time-symmetric microring lasers, Science 346, 975-978 (2014)

work page 2014

[23] [23]

L. Feng, Z. Wang, R. Ma, Y . Wang, X. Zhang, Single-mode laser by parity -time symmetry breaking, Science 346, 972-975 (2014)

work page 2014

[24] [24]

Hodaei, M.A

H. Hodaei, M.A. Miri, A.U. Hassan, W.E. Hayenga, M. Heinrich, D.N. Christodoulides, M. Khajavikhan, Single mode lasing in transversely multi‐moded PT‐symmetric microring resonators, Laser & Photonics Rev . 10, 494-499 (2016)

work page 2016

[25] [25]

Ishida, Y

N. Ishida, Y . Ota, W. Lin, T. Byrnes, Y . Arakawa, S. Iwamoto, A large-scale single-mode array laser based on a topological edge mode, Nanophotonics 11, 2169 -2181 (2022)

work page 2022

[26] [26]

H. Zhao, P. Miao, M.H. Teimourpour, S. Malzard, R. El-Ganainy, H. Schomerus, L. Feng, Topological hybrid silicon microlasers, Nat. Commun. 9, 981 (2018)

work page 2018

[27] [27]

Contractor, W

R. Contractor, W. Noh, W. Redjem, W. Qarony, E. Martin, S. Dhuey, A. Schwartzberg, B. Kante, Scalable single-mode surface -emitting laser via open -Dirac singularities, Nature 608, 692-698 (2022)

work page 2022

[28] [28]

B. Zhu, Q. Wang, D. Leykam, H. Xue, Q.J. Wang, Y .D. Chong, Anomalous Single-Mode Lasing Induced by Nonlinearity and the Non-Hermitian Skin Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 013903 (2022)

work page 2022

[29] [29]

Wong, S.S

S. Wong, S.S. Oh, Topological bulk lasing modes using an imaginary gauge field, Phys . Rev. Res. 3, 033042 (2021)

work page 2021

[30] [30]

Longhi, Non-Hermitian gauged topological laser arrays, Ann

S. Longhi, Non-Hermitian gauged topological laser arrays, Ann. Phys. 530, (2018)

work page 2018

[31] [31]

See Supplemental Material : Gauge-Engineered Tunable Mode Selection in Non-Hermitian Directed-Graph Networks for more details

work page