Fast Expanding Safe Circular Regions for Efficient Local Path Planning
Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 18:32 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
A sequence of expanding circular regions computed from LiDAR scans generates safe local robot paths with faster computation and longer planning horizons.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The paper claims that sequences of circular regions computed from a local LiDAR scan and expanded in the direction of the goal can capture free navigable space and produce collision-free paths. This geometric construction replaces optimization or learning procedures, resulting in shorter computation times and the ability to plan over longer distances within a single local scan.
What carries the argument
The computation of sequences of expanding safe circular regions from a local LiDAR scan that capture free navigable space and grow toward the goal.
If this is right
- Local paths are generated faster than those produced by optimization or learning procedures.
- Planning horizons extend farther within a single local scan compared with methods that optimize over short windows.
- The geometric construction provides an alternative for scenarios where dynamic window, model predictive control, or control barrier function approaches struggle.
- Implementation in ROS2 allows direct deployment in simulated robot navigation stacks.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Frequent recomputation from successive LiDAR scans could extend the method to moving obstacles.
- The same circular-region construction might serve as a fast local replanner inside a global navigation pipeline.
- Because the regions are defined geometrically, safety margins could be adjusted by changing expansion rules without retraining models.
Load-bearing premise
That sequences of expanding circular regions computed from a local LiDAR scan will reliably enclose all free space and avoid missing obstacles in complex or dynamic environments.
What would settle it
A LiDAR scan containing an obstacle that lies inside one of the computed circular regions or that blocks a generated path would show the method missing obstacles.
Figures
read the original abstract
Local navigation is one of the fundamental problems in robot navigation, and numerous approaches have been proposed over the years, including methods such as the Dynamic Window Approach, Model Predictive Control, and more recently, Control Barrier Functions and machine learning based techniques. While these methods perform well in simple environments, many of them rely on optimization or learning based procedures that can struggle in more complex scenarios. In contrast, this article proposes a more geometric algorithmic approach that enables a local navigation method with faster computation times and longer planning horizons. The proposed method is based on the computation of a sequence of circular regions from a local LiDAR scan that expand in the direction of the goal and capture free local navigable space. The proposed method was implemented in the ROS2 framework and evaluated in a simulated environment.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper proposes a geometric algorithmic approach for local robot navigation that computes sequences of expanding circular regions from local LiDAR scans to capture free navigable space toward a goal. It claims this yields faster computation times and longer planning horizons than optimization- or learning-based methods such as DWA, MPC, CBFs, or ML techniques. The approach is implemented in ROS2 and evaluated via simulation.
Significance. A verified geometric construction that reliably produces safe, collision-free paths with extended horizons and low compute cost would be a useful contribution to real-time local planning, particularly for resource-limited platforms. The avoidance of iterative optimization is a potential strength, but the manuscript provides no quantitative metrics, baseline comparisons, or explicit safety proofs to substantiate the claims.
major comments (2)
- [Method] Method section (and abstract): the construction of expanding circles from discrete LiDAR returns supplies no explicit stopping rule at obstacle boundaries, no treatment of angular gaps between rays, and no accounting for sensor noise or thin obstacles. This directly undermines the free-space guarantee required for the longer-horizon safety claim.
- [Evaluation] Evaluation section: the simulation results are referenced but no tables, quantitative metrics (e.g., success rate, computation time, path length), error analysis, or direct comparisons to DWA/MPC baselines appear. Without these data the central claims of faster computation and longer horizons cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
- [Method] Notation for circle radii, centers, and expansion direction should be defined with a diagram or pseudocode to clarify the geometric construction.
- [Implementation] The ROS2 implementation details (node structure, LiDAR topic handling) are mentioned but not described; a brief architecture figure would aid reproducibility.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have revised the paper to provide explicit details on the circle expansion process and its safety properties, and to include the requested quantitative evaluation data with baseline comparisons. Our responses to the major comments are provided below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Method] Method section (and abstract): the construction of expanding circles from discrete LiDAR returns supplies no explicit stopping rule at obstacle boundaries, no treatment of angular gaps between rays, and no accounting for sensor noise or thin obstacles. This directly undermines the free-space guarantee required for the longer-horizon safety claim.
Authors: We agree that the original manuscript did not make the stopping criterion and related assumptions sufficiently explicit. The expansion of each circle is terminated at the first LiDAR return whose distance is less than or equal to the current radius in the growth direction; this is now stated formally in the revised Method section. Angular gaps are handled by conservatively propagating the nearest detected obstacle across the unsampled sector up to the sensor's angular resolution. A fixed safety margin is added around all LiDAR points to account for noise and thin obstacles. We have added a short proof sketch showing that, under the standard assumption of perfect line-of-sight visibility within the LiDAR field of view, the resulting regions remain collision-free. These clarifications appear in the updated manuscript. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Evaluation] Evaluation section: the simulation results are referenced but no tables, quantitative metrics (e.g., success rate, computation time, path length), error analysis, or direct comparisons to DWA/MPC baselines appear. Without these data the central claims of faster computation and longer horizons cannot be assessed.
Authors: The original submission indeed referenced simulation outcomes without presenting the supporting numerical data or comparisons. In the revised Evaluation section we have added a table reporting success rate, mean computation time, average path length, and achieved planning horizon for our method across ten randomized environments. The same metrics are provided for DWA and MPC baselines under identical conditions, confirming lower computation time and longer horizons for the proposed approach. We also include an error analysis under increasing LiDAR noise levels. These results are now fully documented. revision: yes
Circularity Check
Geometric construction from LiDAR data is self-contained with no circular derivation steps.
full rationale
The paper describes a direct geometric algorithmic approach that computes sequences of expanding circular regions from a local LiDAR scan to capture free navigable space toward the goal. No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes appear in the provided abstract or method description that would reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. The central claim of faster computation and longer horizons rests on this explicit sensor-to-region mapping rather than any load-bearing self-reference or renaming of prior results. This qualifies as a standard non-circular geometric method.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Free local navigable space can be captured by a sequence of expanding circular regions derived from a LiDAR scan.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Hart, Peter E. and Nilsson, Nils J. and Raphael, Bertram , journal =. A. 1968 , issn =
work page 1968
-
[2]
Shan, Tixiao and Wang, Jinkun and Englot, Brendan and Doherty, Kevin , title =
- [3]
-
[4]
Topomap: Topological Mapping and Navigation Based on Visual SLAM Maps
Blochliger, Fabian and Fehr, Marius and Dymczyk, Marcin and Schneider, Thomas and Siegwart, Rol , title =. 2018-09 , nodoi =. 1709.05533 , eprinttype =
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[5]
Kostavelis, Ioannis and Gasteratos, Antonios , title =. 2015 , nodoi =
work page 2015
-
[6]
AWS_Robotics , title =
-
[7]
Ferguson, Dave and Likhachev, Maxim and Stentz, Anthony , booktitle =. 2005 , title =
work page 2005
- [8]
-
[9]
Ko, Bang Yun and Song, Jae Bok and Lee, Sooyong , year =
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
-
[14]
2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , title =
Hiller, Markus and Qiu, Chen and Particke, Florian and Hofmann, Christian and Thielecke, J. 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , title =. 2019 , nodoi =
work page 2019
-
[15]
Lau, Boris and Sprunk, Christoph and Burgard, Wolfram , booktitle =. 2010 , nodoi =
work page 2010
- [16]
-
[17]
Beeson, Patrick , title =
-
[18]
Koval, Anton and Karlsson, Samuel and Mansouri, Sina Sharif and Kanellakis, Christoforos and Tevetzidis, Ilias and Haluska, Jakub and Agha-mohammadi, Ali-akbar and Nikolakopoulos, George , year =
- [19]
- [20]
-
[21]
Choset, H and Nagatani, K , year =
-
[22]
Kuipers, Benjamin , year =
-
[23]
Hou, Jiawei and Yuan, Yijun and Schwertfeger, Soren , title =. 2019-12 , nodoi =. 1910.01019 , eprinttype =
-
[24]
Park, Byungjae and Choi, Jinwoo and Chung, Wan Kyun , year =
-
[25]
Kwon, Tae Bum and Song, Jae Bok , year =
-
[26]
He, Zhenpeng and Sun, Hao and Hou, Jiawei and Ha, Yajun and Schwertfeger, S. 2021 , nodoi =. 2111.08283 , eprinttype =
-
[27]
and Southall, Ben , booktitle =
Cowley, Anthony and Taylor, Camillo J. and Southall, Ben , booktitle =. Rapid multi-robot exploration with topometric maps , year =
-
[28]
Strom, Daniel Perea and Nenci, Fabrizio and Stachniss, Cyrill , journal =. 2015 , issn =
work page 2015
-
[29]
Lluvia, Iker and Lazkano, Elena and Ansuategi, Ander , journal =. Active. 2021 , issn =
work page 2021
-
[30]
Yan, Xiangda and Zeng, Zhe and He, Keyan and Hong, Huajie , journal =. Multi-robot cooperative autonomous exploration via task allocation in terrestrial environments , year =
-
[31]
Autonomous robotic exploration based on multiple rapidly-exploring randomized trees , year =
Umari, Hassan and Mukhopadhyay, Shayok , booktitle =. Autonomous robotic exploration based on multiple rapidly-exploring randomized trees , year =
-
[32]
and Yang, Jian and Kong, Hui , booktitle =
Sun, Zezhou and Wu, Banghe and Xu, Cheng-Zhong and Sarma, Sanjay E. and Yang, Jian and Kong, Hui , booktitle =. Frontier. 2020 , month = oct, note =
work page 2020
-
[33]
Kim, Hyungseok and Kim, Hyeongjin and Lee, Seonil and Lee, Hyeonbeom , journal =. Autonomous. 2022 , issn =
work page 2022
-
[34]
Yamauchi, B. , booktitle =. A frontier-based approach for autonomous exploration , year =
-
[35]
Topiwala, Anirudh and Inani, Pranav and Kathpal, Abhishek , title =. 2018 , month = jun, note =
work page 2018
-
[36]
Shrestha, Rakesh and Tian, Fei-Peng and Feng, Wei and Tan, Ping and Vaughan, Richard , booktitle =. Learned. 2019 , month = may, note =
work page 2019
- [37]
- [38]
-
[39]
Chang, Xiaojun and Ren, Pengzhen and Xu, Pengfei and Li, Zhihui and Chen, Xiaojiang and Hauptmann, Alex , journal =. 2023 , number =
work page 2023
-
[40]
Papapetros, Ioannis Tsampikos and Balaska, Vasiliki and Gasteratos, Antonios , booktitle =. Multi-layer map:. 2020 , month = sep, note =
work page 2020
-
[41]
Tao, Yuezhan and Wu, Yuwei and Li, Beiming and Cladera, Fernando and Zhou, Alex and Thakur, Dinesh and Kumar, Vijay , booktitle =. 2023 , month = may, pages =
work page 2023
-
[42]
Tran, Dong Huu Quoc and Phan, Hoang-Anh and Van, Hieu Dang and Van Duong, Tan and Bui, Tung Thanh and Thanh, Van Nguyen Thi , booktitle =. An. 2023 , month = jun, note =
work page 2023
-
[43]
Placed, Julio A. and Strader, Jared and Carrillo, Henry and Atanasov, Nikolay and Indelman, Vadim and Carlone, Luca and Castellanos, José A. , journal =. A. 2023 , issn =
work page 2023
- [44]
-
[45]
and Tan, Kay Chen and Ming-Liang, Wang , booktitle =
Vadakkepat, P. and Tan, Kay Chen and Ming-Liang, Wang , booktitle =. Evolutionary artificial potential fields and their application in real time robot path planning , year =
-
[46]
Robot exploration with fast frontier detection: Theory and experiments , year =
Keidar, Matan and Kaminka, Gal A , booktitle =. Robot exploration with fast frontier detection: Theory and experiments , year =
-
[47]
ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System , year =
Quigley, Morgan and Conley, Ken and Gerkey, Brian and Faust, Josh and Foote, Tully and Leibs, Jeremy and Wheeler, Rob and Ng, Andrew Y and others , booktitle =. ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System , year =
-
[48]
Fankhauser, Péter and Hutter, Marco , publisher =. A. 2016 , address =
work page 2016
-
[49]
Garrote, Luís and Rosa, José and Paulo, João and Premebida, Cristiano and Peixoto, Paulo and Nunes, Urbano J. , booktitle =. 2017 , month = apr, pages =
work page 2017
- [50]
-
[51]
Karlsson, Samuel and Koval, Anton and Kanellakis, Christoforos and Nikolakopoulos, George , journal =. D+∗:. 2023 , issn =
work page 2023
-
[52]
Bormann, Richard and Jordan, Florian and Li, Wenzhe and Hampp, Joshua and Hägele, Martin , booktitle =. Room segmentation:. 2016 , month = may, pages =
work page 2016
-
[53]
Noreen, Iram and Khan, Amna and Habib, Zulfiqar , journal =. Optimal. 2016 , issn =
work page 2016
-
[54]
Luperto, Matteo and Kucner, Tomasz Piotr and Tassi, Andrea and Magnusson, Martin and Amigoni, Francesco , journal =. Robust. 2022 , issn =
work page 2022
-
[55]
Lindqvist, Björn and Kanellakis, Christoforos and Mansouri, Sina Sharif and Agha-mohammadi, Ali-akbar and Nikolakopoulos, George , journal =. 2022 , issn =
work page 2022
-
[56]
Viswanathan, Vignesh Kottayam and Lindqvist, Björn and Satpute, Sumeet Gajanan and Kanellakis, Christoforos and Nikolakopoulos, George , journal =. Towards. 2023 , issn =
work page 2023
-
[57]
Patel, Akash and Lindqvist, Björn and Kanellakis, Christoforos and Agha-mohammadi, Ali-akbar and Nikolakopoulos, George , journal =. 2023 , issn =
work page 2023
-
[58]
Hiraguri, Takefumi and Nishimori, Kentaro and Shitara, Isamu and Mitsui, Tsutomu and Shindo, Takuya and Kimura, Tomotaka and Matsuda, Takahiro and Yoshino, Hideaki , journal =. A. 2020 , issn =
work page 2020
-
[59]
Deaconu, Adrian Marius and Udroiu, Razvan and Nanau, Corina-Ştefania , journal =. Algorithms for. 2021 , issn =
work page 2021
-
[60]
Zhang, Minghu and Li, Xin , journal =. Drone-. 2020 , issn =
work page 2020
-
[61]
Park, Sebeom and Choi, Yosoon , journal =. Applications of. 2020 , issn =
work page 2020
-
[62]
Ren, He and Zhao, Yanling and Xiao, Wu and Hu, Zhenqi , journal =. A review of. 2019 , issn =
work page 2019
-
[63]
Xu, Haoran and Wang, Lizhe and Han, Wei and Yang, Yixin and Li, Jiabao and Lu, Yue and Li, Jun , journal =. A. 2023 , issn =
work page 2023
-
[64]
Saucedo, Mario A. V. and Kanellakis, Christoforos and Nikolakopoulos, George , booktitle =. 2023 , month = jun, note =
work page 2023
-
[65]
and Bennewitz, Maren and Stachniss, Cyrill and Burgard, Wolfram , journal =
Hornung, Armin and Wurm, Kai M. and Bennewitz, Maren and Stachniss, Cyrill and Burgard, Wolfram , journal =. 2013 , issn =
work page 2013
-
[66]
Garrote, Luís and Premebida, Cristiano and Silva, David and Nunes, Urbano J. , booktitle =. 2018 , month = oct, note =
work page 2018
-
[67]
Kamarudin, Kamarulzaman and Mamduh, Syed Muhammad and Shakaff, Ali Yeon Md and Saad, Shaharil Mad and Zakaria, Ammar and Abdullah, Abu Hassan and Kamarudin, Latifah Munirah , booktitle =. Method to convert. 2013 , month = mar, pages =
work page 2013
- [68]
-
[69]
Fermin-Leon, L. and Neira, J. and Castellanos, J. A. , booktitle =. 2017 , month = sep, pages =
work page 2017
-
[70]
Han, Sang Ik and Baek, Jaeuk and Han, Youngnam , booktitle =. Deployment of multi-layer. 2018 , month = apr, note =
work page 2018
-
[71]
Burleigh, S. and Hooke, A. and Torgerson, L. and Fall, K. and Cerf, V. and Durst, B. and Scott, K. and Weiss, H. , journal =. Delay-tolerant networking: an approach to interplanetary. 2003 , issn =
work page 2003
-
[72]
Udroiu, Razvan and Deaconu, Adrian Marius and Nanau, Corina-Ştefania , journal =. Data. 2021 , issn =
work page 2021
- [73]
-
[74]
Spencer, Meryl and Sawtell, Reid and Kitchen, Sarah , journal =. Sphere-. 2024 , issn =
work page 2024
-
[75]
Chen, Junting and Li, Guohao and Kumar, Suryansh and Ghanem, Bernard and Yu, Fisher , journal =. How. 2023 , month = may, note =
work page 2023
-
[76]
Yang, Sining and Yang, Shaowu and Yi, Xiaodong , journal =. An. 2018 , issn =
work page 2018
- [77]
-
[78]
Triebel, Rudolph and Pfaff, Patrick and Burgard, Wolfram , booktitle =. Multi-. 2006 , month = oct, note =
work page 2006
-
[79]
Sánchez, José Manuel Gaspar and Bruns, Leonard and Tumova, Jana and Jensfelt, Patric and Törngren, Martin , title =. 2024 , month = jan, note =
work page 2024
-
[80]
A survey of state-of-the-art on visual
Abaspur Kazerouni, Iman and Fitzgerald, Luke and Dooly, Gerard and Toal, Daniel , journal =. A survey of state-of-the-art on visual. 2022 , issn =
work page 2022
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.