pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16689 · v1 · pith:O336NLL5new · submitted 2026-05-15 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.NI

Against the Monolithic Wireless World Model: Why NextG Needs Composable and Agentic Intelligence

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 21:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.NI
keywords 6GAI-native networkswireless world modelscomposable architecturesagentic intelligencemonolithic modelsfoundation modelssignal processing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Wireless data's configuration dependence and weak feedback make monolithic foundation models unrealistic for 6G, pointing instead to composable agentic architectures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that analogies from large language models to wireless foundation models overlook fundamental differences in data structure. Text and images form a reusable substrate, but wireless data like channel state information and IQ samples depends on network configurations, simulators, and specific tasks with limited feedback. These bottlenecks mean that pre-training and fine-tuning large models will not yield reliable, deployable systems in the near term. Therefore, the authors advocate for architectures in which reasoning models coordinate specialized tools and algorithms through defined interfaces. This shift matters because it offers a more practical route to integrating AI into next-generation wireless networks without waiting for breakthroughs that may not come.

Core claim

AI-native 6G visions that invoke wireless foundation models and wireless world models draw an incomplete analogy to LLMs because wireless data is not self-contained: its meaning is configuration-dependent, simulator-conditioned, task-disaggregated, and weakly grounded in operational feedback. These structural bottlenecks undermine current pre- and post-training recipes. Monolithic models, including mixture-of-experts and wireless world models, are therefore not the most realistic near-term path. Emerging evidence instead supports composable and agentic network architectures in which general reasoning models orchestrate specialized signal processing models, classical algorithms, digital twins

What carries the argument

Composable and agentic network architectures in which general reasoning models orchestrate specialized signal processing models, classical algorithms, digital twins, standards-aware retrieval, and safety checks through explicit programmable interfaces.

If this is right

  • Near-term AI-native networks can combine existing classical algorithms and digital twins with AI components rather than replacing them with one large model.
  • General reasoning models can handle network orchestration while leaving signal processing to specialized components.
  • Safety checks and standards compliance can be enforced explicitly through programmable interfaces.
  • Development proceeds incrementally by layering agentic coordination on top of current systems and simulators.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could speed real-world adoption by reusing proven classical signal processing blocks instead of retraining everything.
  • Similar orchestration patterns may apply to other domains where data is structured but configuration-dependent, such as industrial sensor networks.
  • Live-network tests with varying configurations could quickly reveal whether orchestration reduces the need for massive retraining cycles.

Load-bearing premise

The structural bottlenecks of wireless data cannot be overcome by current or near-term pre- and post-training recipes for large models.

What would settle it

A single large multimodal model trained with existing pre- and post-training methods that delivers consistent performance on wireless tasks across independent network configurations without simulator-specific conditioning or heavy task disaggregation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16689 by Aladin Djuhera, Alecio Binotto, Farhan Ahmed, Haris Gacanin, Holger Boche, Swanand Ravindra Kadhe, Vlad C. Andrei.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Monolithic wireless world models collapse heterogeneous data into an ambiguous interface, whereas agent harnesses orchestrate tools, interfaces, and specialized agents through explicit and auditable tool calls. See App. D for a detailed architecture description. 5. A Composable and Agentic Alternative If monolithic models are the wrong abstraction, the alterna￾tive is not to abandon them, but to place them… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Three-layer agent harness for wireless networks. slicing, or mobility optimization. A safety agent can check proposed actions against SLA, regulatory, vendor, and roll￾back constraints. The agents coordinate through structured tool calls and shared state summaries, while latency-critical decisions remain inside specialized control loops. This architecture is compatible with current infrastruc￾ture. O-RAN a… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

AI-native 6G visions increasingly invoke wireless foundation models, large multimodal models, and wireless world models as the natural endpoint of AI-native networking, drawing an analogy to recent developments in large language models (LLMs). We argue that this analogy is structurally incomplete. The success of LLMs is based on a broad, reusable, and largely self-contained tokenized data substrate, whereas the wireless domain lacks an equivalent data foundation. Unlike text, code, or images, wireless data such as CSI tensors, IQ samples, or scheduler logs are not self-contained: their meaning is configuration-dependent, simulator-conditioned, task-disaggregated, and weakly grounded in operational feedback, all structural bottlenecks that undermine current pre- and post-training recipes. We therefore argue that monolithic models, including mixture-of-experts (MoE) and wireless world models, are not the most realistic near-term path toward deployable AI-native networks. Instead, emerging evidence points toward composable and agentic network architectures, where general reasoning models orchestrate specialized signal processing models, classical algorithms, digital twins, standards-aware retrieval, and safety checks through explicit programmable interfaces.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that the analogy between LLMs and proposed wireless foundation or world models is structurally incomplete. Wireless data (CSI tensors, IQ samples, scheduler logs) lacks the self-contained tokenized substrate of text or images because it is configuration-dependent, simulator-conditioned, task-disaggregated, and weakly grounded in operational feedback; these properties undermine standard pre- and post-training. The paper therefore concludes that monolithic models, including MoE variants and wireless world models, are not the realistic near-term path for AI-native networks and instead advocates composable, agentic architectures in which general reasoning models orchestrate specialized signal-processing models, classical algorithms, digital twins, and standards-aware retrieval via explicit interfaces.

Significance. If the core contrast between data domains holds, the paper usefully challenges the direct importation of LLM-centric visions into 6G research and highlights why modular, programmable orchestration may be more deployable in the near term. It correctly identifies observable differences in data properties and supplies a coherent high-level alternative, though the absence of quantitative comparisons or worked examples limits its immediate technical impact.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: The load-bearing claim that the enumerated structural bottlenecks 'undermine current pre- and post-training recipes' and therefore render monolithic models non-viable is asserted without examining whether wireless-specific adaptations (explicit configuration conditioning, simulator-aware objectives, multi-task unification, or RL-based feedback integration inside a single large model) could mitigate those bottlenecks; the manuscript contrasts data properties but does not rule out such adaptations, leaving the rejection of monolithic approaches under-supported.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback, which helps clarify the scope of our claims. We address the major comment below and indicate planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [—] Abstract: The load-bearing claim that the enumerated structural bottlenecks 'undermine current pre- and post-training recipes' and therefore render monolithic models non-viable is asserted without examining whether wireless-specific adaptations (explicit configuration conditioning, simulator-aware objectives, multi-task unification, or RL-based feedback integration inside a single large model) could mitigate those bottlenecks; the manuscript contrasts data properties but does not rule out such adaptations, leaving the rejection of monolithic approaches under-supported.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript contrasts data properties without a dedicated examination of whether wireless-specific adaptations could mitigate the bottlenecks inside a monolithic model. In the revised version we will add a new subsection (likely in Section 3) that directly addresses each suggested adaptation. We will argue that explicit configuration conditioning still leaves the model dependent on external, non-stationary context that cannot be internalized as a reusable tokenized substrate; simulator-aware objectives improve fidelity but cannot eliminate the fundamental simulator-to-reality gap or the task-disaggregated nature of operational data; multi-task unification does not create cross-task grounding when feedback loops remain sparse; and RL-based feedback integration presupposes reliable, dense operational signals that wireless systems rarely provide. These points will be supported by references to existing literature on domain shift and data grounding. The revision will therefore strengthen, rather than retract, the conclusion that composable agentic architectures are the more realistic near-term path. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: argument rests on domain observations of data properties

full rationale

The paper advances a position that wireless data lacks the self-contained tokenized substrate of text or images due to properties like configuration dependence, simulator conditioning, task disaggregation, and weak feedback grounding. This contrast is presented as an observable structural difference that undermines monolithic pre- and post-training approaches, without any equations, fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to its own inputs by construction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks of data characteristics rather than internally forced.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about the nature of wireless measurements and the requirements for successful large-model training; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Wireless data such as CSI tensors, IQ samples, or scheduler logs are configuration-dependent, simulator-conditioned, task-disaggregated, and weakly grounded in operational feedback.
    This premise is invoked directly to explain why LLM-style pre-training recipes fail in the wireless domain.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5757 in / 1258 out tokens · 60967 ms · 2026-05-19T21:03:06.912112+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2502.07591 , archivePrefix=

    Lingyi Wang and Rashed Shelim and Walid Saad and Naren Ramakrishnan , year=. 2502.07591 , archivePrefix=

  2. [3]

    2602.14833 , archivePrefix=

    Hang Zou and Yu Tian and Bohao Wang and Lina Bariah and Samson Lasaulce and Chongwen Huang and Mérouane Debbah , year=. 2602.14833 , archivePrefix=

  3. [4]

    Alikhani, Sadjad and Charan, Gouranga and Alkhateeb, Ahmed , journal=

  4. [5]

    2025 , publisher=

    Maatouk, Ali and Ayed, Fadhel and Piovesan, Nicola and De Domenico, Antonio and Debbah, Merouane and Luo, Zhi-Quan , journal=. 2025 , publisher=

  5. [6]

    Djuhera, Aladin and Kadhe, Swanand Ravindra and Ahmed, Farhan and Zawad, Syed and Koch, Fernando and Saad, Walid and Boche, Holger , journal=

  6. [7]

    Paszke, Adam and Gross, Sam and Massa, Francisco and Lerer, Adam and Bradbury, James and Chanan, Gregory and Killeen, Trevor and Lin, Zeming and Gimelshein, Natalia and Antiga, Luca and others , journal=

  7. [8]

    2025 , publisher=

    Zhang, Kai and He, Hengtao and Song, Shenghui and Zhang, Jun and Letaief, Khaled B , journal=. 2025 , publisher=

  8. [9]

    Liu, Boyi and Lu, Yongguang and Zhao, Jianguo and Yang, Qiang and Wu, Wen and Chen, Lin and Chauhan, Jagmohan and Zhang, Jun , journal=

  9. [10]

    2026 , organization=

    Djuhera, Aladin and Koch, Fernando and Binotto, Alecio , booktitle=. 2026 , organization=

  10. [11]

    Wang, Xiucheng and Zhang, Yue and Cheng, Nan , journal=

  11. [12]

    Zhang, Haopeng and Ren, Yili and Yuan, Haohan and Zhang, Jingzhe and Shen, Yitong , journal=

  12. [13]

    2023 , publisher=

    He, Zhengran and Zhang, Xixi and Wang, Yu and Lin, Yun and Gui, Guan and Gacanin, Haris , journal=. 2023 , publisher=

  13. [14]

    2021 , publisher=

    Cheng, Cheng and Guo, Liang and Wu, Tong and Sun, Jinlong and Gui, Guan and Adebisi, Bamidele and Gacanin, Haris and Sari, Hikmet , journal=. 2021 , publisher=

  14. [15]

    2019 , publisher=

    Karunaratne, Samurdhi and Gacanin, Haris , journal=. 2019 , publisher=

  15. [16]

    IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , year=

    Djuhera, Aladin and Andrei, Vlad C and Li, Xinyang and M. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , year=

  16. [17]

    2025 , organization=

    Djuhera, Aladin and Andrei, Vlad C and Pourghasemian, Mohsen and Gacanin, Haris and Boche, Holger and Saad, Walid , booktitle=. 2025 , organization=

  17. [18]

    Masterman, Tula and Besen, Sandi and Sawtell, Mason and Chao, Alex , journal=

  18. [19]

    2025 , publisher=

    Dev, Kapal and Khowaja, Sunder Ali and Zeydan, Engin and Singh, Keshav and Debbah, Merouane , journal=. 2025 , publisher=

  19. [20]

    2603.17420 , archivePrefix=

    Jie Zheng and Dusit Niyato and Changyuan Zhao and Jiawen Kang and Jiacheng Wang , year=. 2603.17420 , archivePrefix=

  20. [21]

    Zou, Hang and Yang, Yuzhi and Bariah, Lina and Tian, Yu and Lu, Yuhuan and Wang, Bohao and Bara, Anis and Mefgouda, Brahim and Liu, Hao and Tao, Yiwei and others , journal=

  21. [22]

    Lewis, Patrick and Perez, Ethan and Piktus, Aleksandra and Petroni, Fabio and Karpukhin, Vladimir and Goyal, Naman and others , booktitle=

  22. [23]

    Ouyang, Long and Wu, Jeffrey and Jiang, Xu and Almeida, Diogo and Wainwright, Carroll and Mishkin, Pamela and others , booktitle=

  23. [24]

    2406.14440 , archivePrefix=

    Boxun Liu and Xuanyu Liu and Shijian Gao and Xiang Cheng and Liuqing Yang , year=. 2406.14440 , archivePrefix=

  24. [25]

    2404.17317 , archivePrefix=

    Michele Polese and Leonardo Bonati and Salvatore D'Oro and Pedram Johari and Davide Villa and Sakthivel Velumani and Rajeev Gangula and Maria Tsampazi and Clifton Paul Robinson and Gabriele Gemmi and Andrea Lacava and Stefano Maxenti and Hai Cheng and Tommaso Melodia , year=. 2404.17317 , archivePrefix=

  25. [26]

    Bonati, Leonardo and Polese, Michele and D'Oro, Salvatore and Basagni, Stefano and Melodia, Tommaso , journal=

  26. [27]

    Hoydis, Jakob and Cammerer, Sebastian and Ait Aoudia, Faycal and Vem, Avinash and Binder, Nikolaus and Marcus, Guillermo and Keller, Alexander , journal=

  27. [28]

    Alkhateeb, Ahmed , journal=

  28. [29]

    Hoffmann, Jordan and Borgeaud, Sebastian and Mensch, Arthur and Buchatskaya, Elena and Cai, Trevor and Rutherford, Eliza and others , booktitle=

  29. [30]

    2025 , howpublished =

  30. [31]

    2406.01768 , archivePrefix=

    Rasoul Nikbakht and Mohamed Benzaghta and Giovanni Geraci , year=. 2406.01768 , archivePrefix=

  31. [32]

    2409.05314 , archivePrefix=

    Ali Maatouk and Kenny Chirino Ampudia and Rex Ying and Leandros Tassiulas , year=. 2409.05314 , archivePrefix=

  32. [33]

    Lin, Xingqin and Li, Jing and Baldemair, Robert and Cheng, Tao and Parkvall, Stefan and Larsson, Dennis C and Koorapaty, Havish and Frenne, Mattias and Falahati, Sorour and Grovlen, Asbjorn and Werner, Karl , journal=

  33. [34]

    2022 , publisher=

    Djigal, Hamza and Xu, Jia and Liu, Linfeng and Zhang, Yan , journal=. 2022 , publisher=

  34. [35]

    2023 , publisher=

    Li, Qiaoyu and Sisk, Philip and Kannan, Arumugam and Yoo, Taesang and Luo, Tao and Shah, Gaurav and Manjunath, Badri and Samarathungage, Chanaka and Boroujeni, Mahmoud Taherzadeh and Pezeshki, Hamed and others , journal=. 2023 , publisher=

  35. [36]

    2019 , publisher=

    Jin, Yu and Zhang, Jiayi and Jin, Shi and Ai, Bo , journal=. 2019 , publisher=

  36. [37]

    Kaplan, Jared and McCandlish, Sam and Henighan, Tom and Brown, Tom B and Chess, Benjamin and Child, Rewon and Gray, Scott and Radford, Alec and Wu, Jeffrey and Amodei, Dario , journal=

  37. [38]

    Assran, Mahmoud and Duval, Quentin and Misra, Ishan and Bojanowski, Piotr and Vincent, Pascal and Rabbat, Michael and LeCun, Yann and Ballas, Nicolas , booktitle=

  38. [39]

    2024 , volume=

    Xu, Shengzhe and Kurisummoottil Thomas, Christo and Hashash, Omar and Muralidhar, Nikhil and Saad, Walid and Ramakrishnan, Naren , journal=. 2024 , volume=

  39. [40]

    Large wireless model (LWM): A foundation model for wireless channels,

    Sadjad Alikhani and Gouranga Charan and Ahmed Alkhateeb , year=. 2411.08872 , archivePrefix=

  40. [41]

    2509.15258 , archivePrefix=

    Zheng Yang and Guoxuan Chi and Chenshu Wu and Hanyu Liu and Yuchong Gao and Yunhao Liu and Jie Xu and Tony Xiao Han , year=. 2509.15258 , archivePrefix=

  41. [42]

    A wireless foundation model for multi-task prediction,

    Yucheng Sheng and Jiacheng Wang and Xingyu Zhou and Le Liang and Hao Ye and Shi Jin and Geoffrey Ye Li , year=. 2507.05938 , archivePrefix=

  42. [43]

    2412.08908 , archivePrefix=

    Boxun Liu and Shijian Gao and Xuanyu Liu and Xiang Cheng and Liuqing Yang , year=. 2412.08908 , archivePrefix=

  43. [44]

    MambaCSP: Hybrid-Attention State Space Models for Hardware-Efficient Channel State Prediction

    Aladin Djuhera and Haris Gacanin and Holger Boche , year=. 2604.21957 , archivePrefix=

  44. [45]

    Jiang, Feibo and Pan, Cunhua and Dong, Li and Wang, Kezhi and Debbah, Merouane and Niyato, Dusit and Han, Zhu , journal=

  45. [46]

    2025 , note=

    Saad, Walid and Hashash, Omar and Thomas, Christo Kurisummoottil and Chaccour, Christina and Debbah, Merouane and Mandayam, Narayan and Han, Zhu , journal=. 2025 , note=

  46. [47]

    2026 , eprint=

    From Digital Twins to World Models:Opportunities, Challenges, and Applications for Mobile Edge General Intelligence , author=. 2026 , eprint=

  47. [48]

    IEEE Communications Standards Magazine , year=

    Advanced architectures integrated with agentic AI for next-generation wireless networks , author=. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine , year=

  48. [49]

    The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Survey

    The landscape of emerging ai agent architectures for reasoning, planning, and tool calling: A survey , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.11584 , year=

  49. [50]

    2024 , eprint=

    LLM4CP: Adapting Large Language Models for Channel Prediction , author=. 2024 , eprint=

  50. [51]

    2026 , eprint=

    MambaCSP: Hybrid-Attention State Space Models for Hardware-Efficient Channel State Prediction , author=. 2026 , eprint=

  51. [52]

    2021 , eprint=

    Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding , author=. 2021 , eprint=

  52. [53]

    2310.15051 , archivePrefix=

    Ali Maatouk and Fadhel Ayed and others , year=. 2310.15051 , archivePrefix=

  53. [54]

    IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , volume=

    Machine and deep learning for resource allocation in multi-access edge computing: A survey , author=. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  54. [55]

    IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , volume=

    Machine learning based time domain millimeter-wave beam prediction for 5G-advanced and beyond: Design, analysis, and over-the-air experiments , author=. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  55. [56]

    IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , volume=

    Channel estimation for cell-free mmWave massive MIMO through deep learning , author=. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  56. [57]

    Telecom World Models: Unifying Digital Twins, Foundation Models, and Predictive Planning for 6G

    Telecom World Models: Unifying Digital Twins, Foundation Models, and Predictive Planning for 6G , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.06882 , year=

  57. [58]

    2025 , eprint=

    Generative AI Meets Wireless Sensing: Towards Wireless Foundation Model , author=. 2025 , eprint=

  58. [59]

    IQFM—A Wireless Foundation Model for I/Q Streams in AI-Native 6G , year=

    Mashaal, Omar and Abou-Zeid, Hatem , journal=. IQFM—A Wireless Foundation Model for I/Q Streams in AI-Native 6G , year=

  59. [60]

    2025 , eprint=

    A Wireless Foundation Model for Multi-Task Prediction , author=. 2025 , eprint=

  60. [61]

    Large Multi-Modal Models (LMMs) as Universal Foundation Models for AI-Native Wireless Systems , year=

    Xu, Shengzhe and Kurisummoottil Thomas, Christo and Hashash, Omar and Muralidhar, Nikhil and Saad, Walid and Ramakrishnan, Naren , journal=. Large Multi-Modal Models (LMMs) as Universal Foundation Models for AI-Native Wireless Systems , year=

  61. [62]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14603 , year=

    Towards a Foundation Model for Communication Systems , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14603 , year=

  62. [63]

    2025 , eprint=

    Large Wireless Model (LWM): A Foundation Model for Wireless Channels , author=. 2025 , eprint=

  63. [64]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Self-supervised learning from images with a joint-embedding predictive architecture , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  64. [65]

    Neural Networks , volume=

    Deep learning, reinforcement learning, and world models , author=. Neural Networks , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  65. [66]

    2026 , publisher=

    Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)-Native Wireless Systems: Digital Twins and World Models for Beyond 6G Networks , author=. 2026 , publisher=

  66. [67]

    On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models

    On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258 , year=

  67. [68]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Language Models are Few-Shot Learners , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  68. [69]

    Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models

    Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361 , year=

  69. [70]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  70. [71]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Training Language Models to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  71. [72]

    Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive

    Lewis, Patrick and Perez, Ethan and Piktus, Aleksandra and Petroni, Fabio and Karpukhin, Vladimir and Goyal, Naman and others , booktitle=. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive

  72. [73]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  73. [74]

    Yao, Shunyu and Zhao, Jeffrey and Yu, Dian and Du, Nan and Shafran, Izhak and Narasimhan, Karthik and Cao, Yuan , journal=

  74. [75]

    Communications of the

    Datasheets for Datasets , author=. Communications of the

  75. [76]

    Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

    Model Cards for Model Reporting , author=. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages=

  76. [77]

    Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible

    Pushkarna, Mahima and Zaldivar, Andrew and Kjartansson, Oddur , booktitle=. Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible

  77. [78]

    An Overview of the

    Lin, Xingqin and Li, Jing and Baldemair, Robert and Cheng, Tao and Parkvall, Stefan and Larsson, Dennis C and Koorapaty, Havish and Frenne, Mattias and Falahati, Sorour and Grovlen, Asbjorn and Werner, Karl , journal=. An Overview of the

  78. [79]

    Artificial Intelligence in

    Lin, Xingqin and others , journal=. Artificial Intelligence in

  79. [80]

    Sionna: An Open-Source Library fo r Next-Generation Physical Layer Research,

    Sionna: An Open-Source Library for Next-Generation Physical Layer Research , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11854 , year=

  80. [81]

    Over-the-Air Deep Learning Based Radio Signal Classification , author=

Showing first 80 references.