pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16772 · v1 · pith:FRO4R7TKnew · submitted 2026-05-16 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO

Constraints on non-canonical chaotic inflation from ACT DR6 and BICEP/Keck data

Wei Yang , Chen-Hao Wu , Ya-Peng Hu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 21:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.CO
keywords non-canonical inflationchaotic inflationACT DR6BICEP/KeckMCMC constraintsslow-roll approximationequilateral non-Gaussianitye-foldings
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:FRO4R7TK Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number? 
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{FRO4R7TK}

Prints a linked pith:FRO4R7TK badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

Non-canonical chaotic inflation models remain viable for potential indices 1/3, 2/3 and 1 when the parameter α is constrained by recent data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether chaotic inflation can survive in a non-canonical kinetic framework under high-precision cosmological observations. Slow-roll dynamics combined with the equilateral non-Gaussianity bound first restrict the allowed values of the potential index n. Numerical integration of the perturbation equations followed by MCMC sampling on the joint ACT DR6, Planck, and BICEP/Keck dataset then produces tight limits on the non-canonical parameter α for the three chosen n values. The same analysis shows that the required number of e-foldings settles near 54 without additional tuning. These steps demonstrate that a non-standard kinetic term can bring certain power-law potentials back inside the 1σ contours of current data.

Core claim

In the non-canonical chaotic inflation model the parameter α is bounded at the 1σ level to 8.8^{+1.6}_{-2.8} for n=1/3, 11.7^{+1.7}_{-2.6} for n=2/3, and 16.4^{+3.7}_{-7.0} for n=1 when the primordial perturbation equations are solved numerically and fitted to the combined P-ACT-LB-BK18 dataset; the e-folding number converges naturally to N ≃ 54.

What carries the argument

The non-canonical parameter α that rescales the kinetic term of the inflaton, thereby modifying the slow-roll trajectory and the resulting perturbation spectra for a given power-law potential.

If this is right

  • For n=1/3 the non-canonical parameter is limited to 8.8^{+1.6}_{-2.8} at 1σ.
  • For n=2/3 the corresponding bound is 11.7^{+1.7}_{-2.6}.
  • For n=1 the bound tightens to 16.4^{+3.7}_{-7.0}.
  • The required e-folding number converges to approximately 54 without manual adjustment.
  • Non-canonical kinetic terms can restore viability to chaotic inflation models previously excluded by data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same numerical pipeline could be applied to other single-field potentials to test whether non-canonical kinetics generically reduce fine-tuning.
  • Future Stage-4 CMB experiments that tighten the bound on f_NL^equil would directly translate into narrower intervals on α for each n.
  • The natural emergence of N ≃ 54 may point to a dynamical preference for a particular inflationary energy scale once non-canonical terms are included.

Load-bearing premise

The slow-roll approximation remains valid and the equilateral non-Gaussianity bound correctly restricts the potential index n before the MCMC stage.

What would settle it

A future measurement of the equilateral non-Gaussianity parameter lying outside the interval used to pre-select n, or a tensor-to-scalar ratio falling outside the range predicted by the reported α intervals, would rule out the viability of these potentials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16772 by Chen-Hao Wu, Wei Yang, Ya-Peng Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Observational constraints on ns − r for the chaotic inflation at Non￾canonical framework at k∗ = 0.05M pc−1 . The 1σ and 2σ contours are the observational results from the P-ACT-LB-BK18 data [7, 8]. Theoretical models are shown for three power-law potentials, V(ϕ) ∝ ϕ 1 (black), ϕ 2/3 (red), and ϕ 1/3 (blue). Dashed lines denote the standard canonical limits (α = 1), which generally predict an excess of te… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The corner plot for the parameters Θ = {α, M, V0, N} under the potential index n = 1/3 by using the P-ACT-LB-BK18 data [7, 8]. By analyzing these joint and marginal posteriors, we can clearly observe how the non-canonical dynamics respond to dif￾ferent potential indices. Specifically, the data tightly constrains the non-canonical parameter to α = 8.8 +1.6 −2.8 for n = 1/3 (Fig.2), α = 11.7 +1.7 −2.6 for n … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The corner plot for the parameters Θ = {α, M, V0, N} under the potential index n = 2/3 by using the P-ACT-LB-BK18 data [7, 8]. intricate dynamics, the e-folds parameter is robustly constrained to N ≃ 54, ensuring that the standard thermal history of the universe is perfectly accommodated. To explicitly present the phenomenological results, we extract the posterior distributions for the primordial observabl… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The corner plot for the primordial observables ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this study, we precisely evaluated the feasibility of the chaotic inflation model within a non-canonical kinetic framework. By applying the slow-roll approximation and imposing constraints on the equilateral non-Gaussianity $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm equil}$, we imposed constraints on the feasible range of the potential index $n$. We established physical bounds for the non-canonical parameter $\alpha$. To obtain precise parameter constraints, we solved the primordial perturbation equations numerically and conducted a rigorous MCMC analysis by using a comprehensive joint P-ACT-LB-BK18 dataset. For these potentials $n=1/3$, $2/3$, and $1$, our results respectively tightly limit $\alpha$ to the levels of $8.8^{+1.6}_{-2.8}$, $11.7^{+1.7}_{-2.6}$, and $16.4^{+3.7}_{-7.0}$, within the corresponding $1\sigma$ confidence intervals. Meanwhile, the required number of $e$-foldings naturally converges to $N \simeq 54$, without the need for fine-tuning. These findings confirm that non-standard mechanisms can resurrect excluded chaotic inflation models within the $1\sigma$ allowed regions of high-precision cosmological data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript evaluates non-canonical chaotic inflation with potentials V(φ) ∝ φ^n for n = 1/3, 2/3, and 1. Slow-roll analysis combined with the Planck equilateral non-Gaussianity bound is used to restrict the viable range of n; the primordial perturbation equations are then solved numerically and a joint P-ACT-LB-BK18 dataset is analyzed via MCMC to obtain 1σ constraints on the non-canonical exponent α of 8.8^{+1.6}_{-2.8}, 11.7^{+1.7}_{-2.6}, and 16.4^{+3.7}_{-7.0} respectively, together with a natural convergence of the number of e-foldings to N ≃ 54.

Significance. If the analysis is robust, the results demonstrate that non-canonical kinetic terms can restore viability to chaotic inflation models previously excluded by data, furnishing concrete observational bounds on α and a parameter-free value for N. The numerical integration of the perturbation equations and the use of a comprehensive joint dataset constitute clear methodological strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [non-Gaussianity constraints section] The pre-MCMC restriction of n via the f_NL^equil bound (described in the non-Gaussianity constraints section) is presented as independent of α. In non-canonical models the equilateral bispectrum is controlled by the sound speed c_s, which depends on both the potential index n and the non-canonical exponent α; an α-independent cut on n therefore risks inconsistent priors for the subsequent MCMC sampling of α and may bias the reported 1σ intervals.
  2. [slow-roll analysis and methods] Slow-roll expressions relating n to the observables (used prior to the numerical perturbation solution) are applied after fixing n but before sampling α. For the best-fit values of α the slow-roll parameters and the relation between n and the spectral index may receive O(1) corrections once α is large; verification that slow-roll remains valid throughout the relevant field range for each quoted α interval is not shown.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract and data section] The abstract refers to the 'P-ACT-LB-BK18 dataset' without spelling out the individual surveys or providing a reference; this should be expanded in the data section for clarity.
  2. [figures and tables] Figure captions and table headers could more explicitly state whether the quoted α intervals are marginalized over all other parameters or conditional on the fixed n values.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of the methodology that we address point by point below. We believe the core results remain robust, as the final constraints derive from numerical integration rather than the approximate pre-MCMC steps, but we will incorporate clarifications and additional checks in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [non-Gaussianity constraints section] The pre-MCMC restriction of n via the f_NL^equil bound (described in the non-Gaussianity constraints section) is presented as independent of α. In non-canonical models the equilateral bispectrum is controlled by the sound speed c_s, which depends on both the potential index n and the non-canonical exponent α; an α-independent cut on n therefore risks inconsistent priors for the subsequent MCMC sampling of α and may bias the reported 1σ intervals.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the equilateral non-Gaussianity depends on the sound speed c_s, which in turn depends on both n and α in non-canonical models. The pre-MCMC restriction on n was performed in the slow-roll limit to identify a priori viable potential indices consistent with Planck bounds before numerical sampling. To address the concern about potential inconsistency, we will revise the non-Gaussianity constraints section to explicitly note the α-dependence of c_s and show that the selected n values satisfy the bound for α in the range later explored by MCMC. The reported constraints themselves are obtained from the full numerical solution of the perturbation equations, which correctly incorporates the α-dependent sound speed and bispectrum at each step, thereby avoiding bias in the final 1σ intervals. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [slow-roll analysis and methods] Slow-roll expressions relating n to the observables (used prior to the numerical perturbation solution) are applied after fixing n but before sampling α. For the best-fit values of α the slow-roll parameters and the relation between n and the spectral index may receive O(1) corrections once α is large; verification that slow-roll remains valid throughout the relevant field range for each quoted α interval is not shown.

    Authors: We agree that large α can introduce O(1) corrections to slow-roll parameters. The slow-roll expressions were used only for the initial selection of n; the primary results come from direct numerical integration of the perturbation equations, which does not assume slow-roll. To strengthen the manuscript, we will add an explicit verification (e.g., plots or tables of ε and η) confirming that slow-roll conditions hold over the field range corresponding to the quoted 1σ α intervals for each n, evaluated at the best-fit parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; constraints derived from external data

full rationale

The paper first applies slow-roll and f_NL^equil bounds to restrict the discrete choices of potential index n, then numerically solves the perturbation equations and runs MCMC to constrain the free parameter α against the joint P-ACT-LB-BK18 dataset. The reported α intervals and the convergence of N to ~54 are direct outputs of this fitting procedure rather than quantities that reduce to the model's own equations or prior self-citations by construction. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear in the derivation; the central results remain externally falsifiable via the cosmological observations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard slow-roll cosmology and numerical perturbation theory; alpha is the primary fitted parameter while n values are selected and then constrained.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha
    Non-canonical kinetic parameter fitted via MCMC to the joint dataset for each fixed n.
  • n
    Potential index values 1/3, 2/3, 1 chosen for study and limited by non-Gaussianity bound.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Slow-roll approximation holds during inflation.
    Invoked to evaluate feasibility and apply f_NL^equil constraints on n.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5757 in / 1287 out tokens · 62663 ms · 2026-05-19T21:22:22.821786+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 389–393. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82) 91219-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82 1982

  2. [2]

    A. H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347–356.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.347 1981

  3. [3]

    Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity

    Y . Akrami, et al., Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A9. arXiv:1905.05697, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 201935891. 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 2018

  4. [4]

    P. A. R. Ade, et al., Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (15) (2021) 151301. arXiv:2110.00483, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.151301 2018

  5. [5]

    A. G. Adame, et al., DESI 2024 VI: cosmological con- straints from the measurements of baryon acoustic os- cillations, JCAP 02 (2025) 021. arXiv:2404.03002, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 2024

  6. [7]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters

    T. Louis, et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods andΛCDM parameters, JCAP 11 (2025) 062. arXiv:2503.14452, doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2025/11/062

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [8]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models

    E. Calabrese, et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 constraints on extended cosmological models, JCAP 11 (2025) 063. arXiv:2503.14454, doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2025/11/063

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [9]

    Noori Gashti, M

    S. Noori Gashti, M. R. Alipour, M. A. S. Afshar, B. Pourhassan, J. Sadeghi, From theory to observation: Swampland conjectures and ACT constraints on marginally deformed R2 inflation, Phys. Lett. B 876 (2026) 140398. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140398

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140398 2026

  9. [10]

    Aldabergenov, S

    Y . Aldabergenov, S. V . Ketov, Single-field D-type infla- tion in the minimal supergravity in light of Planck-ACT- SPT data, Eur. Phys. J. C 86 (1) (2026) 91. arXiv:2512. 08760,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15325-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15325-8 2026

  10. [12]

    Yuennan, P

    J. Yuennan, P. Koad, F. Atamurotov, P. Channuie, Quantum- corrected ϕ4 inflation in light of ACT observations, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (11) (2025) 1307. arXiv:2508.17263, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15060-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15060-6 2025

  11. [14]

    Addazi, Y

    A. Addazi, Y . Aldabergenov, S. V . Ketov, Curvature correc- tions to Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT results, Phys. Lett. B 869 (2025) 139883. arXiv:2505.10305, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139883

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139883 2025

  12. [15]

    S. D. Odintsov, T. Paul, ACT inflation and its influence on reheating era in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Lett. B 870 (2025) 139930. arXiv:2508.11377, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139930

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139930 2025

  13. [16]

    Y . Zhu, Q. Gao, Y . Gong, Z. Yi, Inflationary models with Gauss–Bonnet coupling in light of ACT observations, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (10) (2025) 1227. arXiv:2508.09707, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14969-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14969-2 2025

  14. [17]

    Saini, A

    S. Saini, A. Nautiyal, Power law α -Starobinsky inflation, Phys. Rev. D 113 (4) (2026) 043546.arXiv:2505.16853, doi:10.1103/6q8y-lcg2

    work page doi:10.1103/6q8y-lcg2 2026

  15. [18]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. A. G. García, N. Nagata, D. V . Nanopou- los, K. A. Olive, Deformations of Starobinsky inflation in no-scale SU(5) and SO(10) GUTs, JCAP 12 (2025) 038. arXiv:2508.13279, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/ 12/038

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/ 2025

  16. [19]

    W. J. Wolf, Inflationary attractors and radiative corrections in light of ACT data, JCAP 02 (2026) 088. arXiv:2506. 12436,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/088

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/088 2026

  17. [20]

    Ahmed, S

    W. Ahmed, S. O. Allehabi, M. U. Rehman, Revisiting poly- nomial hybrid inflation: Planck and ACT compatibility via radiative corrections, Phys. Rev. D 113 (4) (2026) 043532. arXiv:2508.01998,doi:10.1103/jxg5-khj2

    work page doi:10.1103/jxg5-khj2 2026

  18. [21]

    M. He, M. Hong, K. Mukaida, Increase of ns in regularized pole inflation & Einstein-Cartan gravity, JCAP 09 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [23]

    Mohammadi, Q

    Yogesh, A. Mohammadi, Q. Wu, T. Zhu, Starobinsky like inflation and EGB Gravity in the light of ACT, JCAP 10 (2025) 010. arXiv:2505.05363, doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2025/10/010

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [24]

    S. D. Odintsov, V . K. Oikonomou, Power-law F(R) gravity as deformations to Starobinsky inflation in view of ACT, Phys. Lett. B 870 (2025) 139907. arXiv:2509.06251, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139907

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139907 2025

  21. [25]

    A. I. Keskin, Rainbow f(R) Inflation: de Sitter- Quintessence Phases, Phys. Lett. B 872 (2026) 140069. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.140069

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.140069 2026

  22. [26]

    Salvio, Independent connection in action during in- flation, Phys

    A. Salvio, Independent connection in action during in- flation, Phys. Rev. D 112 (6) (2025) L061301. arXiv: 2504.10488,doi:10.1103/tq3v-vy3y

    work page doi:10.1103/tq3v-vy3y 2025

  23. [28]

    Bostan, R

    N. Bostan, R. H. Dejrah, A. Ghoshal, Grand unifica- tion Higgs-R2 Inflation: Complementarity between pro- ton decay and CMB observables, Phys. Rev. D 113 (5) (2026) 055042. arXiv:2511.05673, doi:10.1103/ nx7w-xstd. 8

    work page arXiv 2026

  24. [29]

    Noori Gashti, M

    S. Noori Gashti, M. A. S. Afshar, M. R. Alipour, B. Pourhassan, J. Sadeghi, From minimal Higgs inflation with (R2) term in palatini gravity to Swampland conjec- tures under ACT constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (11) (2025) 1343.doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15066-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15066-0 2025

  25. [30]

    Q. Gao, Y . Qian, Y . Gong, Z. Yi, Observational constraints on inflationary models with non-minimally derivative cou- pling by ACT, JCAP 08 (2025) 083. arXiv:2506.18456, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/083

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/083 2025

  26. [31]

    Q. Gao, Y . Gong, Z. Yi, F. Zhang, Nonminimal cou- pling in light of ACT data, Phys. Dark Univ. 50 (2025) 102106. arXiv:2504.15218, doi:10.1016/j.dark. 2025.102106

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark 2025

  27. [32]

    Dioguardi, A

    C. Dioguardi, A. Karam, Palatini linear attractors are back in action, Phys. Rev. D 111 (12) (2025) 123521. arXiv: 2504.12937,doi:10.1103/23b3-9d7q

    work page doi:10.1103/23b3-9d7q 2025

  28. [33]

    Z. Yi, X. Wang, Q. Gao, Y . Gong, Approximate recon- struction of inflationary potential with ACT observations, Phys. Lett. B 871 (2025) 140002. arXiv:2505.10268, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.140002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.140002 2025

  29. [34]

    McDonald, Unitarity-conserving nonminimally cou- pled inflation and the ACT spectral index, Phys

    J. McDonald, Unitarity-conserving nonminimally cou- pled inflation and the ACT spectral index, Phys. Rev. D 112 (12) (2025) 123525. arXiv:2506.12916, doi: 10.1103/k3r6-klxs

    work page doi:10.1103/k3r6-klxs 2025

  30. [35]

    Pallis, Kinetically modified Palatini inflation meets ACT data, Phys

    C. Pallis, Kinetically modified Palatini inflation meets ACT data, Phys. Lett. B 868 (2025) 139739. arXiv:2505. 23243,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139739

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139739 2025

  31. [36]

    Dioguardi, A

    C. Dioguardi, A. J. Iovino, A. Racioppi, Fractional at- tractors in light of the latest ACT observations, Phys. Lett. B 868 (2025) 139664. arXiv:2504.02809, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139664

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139664 2025

  32. [38]

    Yuennan, F

    J. Yuennan, T. Eadkhong, F. Atamurotov, P. Channuie, Con- straining non-minimally coupled squared-quartic hilltop inflation in light of ACT observations, Phys. Dark Univ. 52 (2026) 102282. arXiv:2511.17216, doi:10.1016/ j.dark.2026.102282

    work page arXiv 2026

  33. [39]

    V . K. Oikonomou, String corrected scalar field infla- tion compatible with the ACT data, Nucl. Phys. B 1026 (2026) 117437. arXiv:2508.19196, doi:10.1016/j. nuclphysb.2026.117437

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2026

  34. [40]

    V . F. Mukhanov, A. Vikman, Enhancing the tensor- to-scalar ratio in simple inflation, JCAP 02 (2006)

    work page 2006

  35. [41]

    arXiv:astro-ph/0512066, doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2006/02/004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  36. [42]

    Can cosmological observations uniquely determine the nature of dark energy ?

    S. Unnikrishnan, Can cosmological observations uniquely determine the nature of dark energy ?, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 063007. arXiv:0805.0578, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.78.063007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  37. [43]

    Rezazadeh, K

    K. Rezazadeh, K. Karami, P. Karimi, Intermediate infla- tion from a non-canonical scalar field, JCAP 09 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [45]

    Non-canonical inflation coupled to matter

    S. Céspedes, A.-C. Davis, Non-canonical inflation coupled to matter, JCAP 11 (2015) 014.arXiv:1506.01244, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/11/014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/11/014 2015

  39. [46]

    N. K. Stein, W. H. Kinney, Planck Limits on Non-canonical Generalizations of Large-field Inflation Models, JCAP 04 (2017) 006. arXiv:1609.08959, doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2017/04/006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [47]

    T. F. Serish, S. A. Hosseini Mansoori, F. Felegary, Ö. Akarsu, M. Sami, k-inflation: non-separable case meets ACT measurements, JCAP 04 (2026) 031. arXiv:2511. 16621,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/04/031

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/04/031 2026

  41. [48]

    I. D. Gialamas, T. Katsoulas, K. Tamvakis, Keeping the relation between the Starobinsky model and no-scale su- pergravity ACTive, JCAP 09 (2025) 060. arXiv:2505. 03608,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/060

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/060 2025

  42. [49]

    Unnikrishnan, V

    S. Unnikrishnan, V . Sahni, A. Toporensky, Refining in- flation using non-canonical scalars, JCAP 08 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [50]

    arXiv:1205.0786, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2012/08/018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2012

  44. [51]

    S. S. Mishra, V . Sahni, Canonical and Non-canonical Infla- tion in the light of the recent BICEP/Keck results (2 2022). arXiv:2202.03467

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [52]

    S. Lola, A. Lymperis, E. N. Saridakis, Inflation with non- canonical scalar fields revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (8) (2021) 719. arXiv:2005.14069, doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-021-09516-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2021

  46. [53]

    Garriga, V

    J. Garriga, V . F. Mukhanov, Perturbations in k-inflation, Phys. Lett. B 458 (1999) 219–225. arXiv:hep-th/ 9904176,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00602-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00602-4 1999

  47. [54]

    Observational Signatures and Non-Gaussianities of General Single Field Inflation

    X. Chen, M.-x. Huang, S. Kachru, G. Shiu, Observational signatures and non-Gaussianities of general single field inflation, JCAP 01 (2007) 002. arXiv:hep-th/0605045, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/01/002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/01/002 2007

  48. [55]

    A. D. Linde, Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Lett. B 129 (1983) 177–181.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90837-7 1983

  49. [57]

    Gravity Waves and Linear Inflation from Axion Monodromy

    L. McAllister, E. Silverstein, A. Westphal, Gravity Waves and Linear Inflation from Axion Monodromy, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 046003. arXiv:0808.0706, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.82.046003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  50. [58]

    X. Dong, B. Horn, E. Silverstein, A. Westphal, Simple exercises to flatten your potential, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 026011. arXiv:1011.4521, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 84.026011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd 2011

  51. [59]

    Allyset al.[LiteBIRD], PTEP2023(2023) no.4, 042F01 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac150 [arXiv:2202.02773 [astro-ph.IM]]

    E. Allys, et al., Probing Cosmic Inflation with the Lite- BIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Sur- vey, PTEP 2023 (4) (2023) 042F01. arXiv:2202.02773, doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac150

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac150 2023

  52. [60]

    K. N. Abazajian, et al., CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition, 2016. arXiv:1610.02743, doi:10.2172/ 1352047. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016