pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17202 · v1 · pith:PEX375QBnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · ✦ hep-ph

Systematic analysis of fermionic masses and flavor mixings: a model-independent approach

E. Barradas-Guevara , O. Felix-Beltran , F. Gonzalez-Canales , V. Luna-Mendoza , A. Perez-Martinez , M. Ramos-Martinez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 13:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords fermion massesflavor mixingsPMNS matrixneutrino oscillationsmodel-independentchi-squared analysismass matrix parameterization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A model-independent parameterization of the 3x3 fermion mass matrix yields expressions for the PMNS mixing matrix that fit experimental neutrino oscillation data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper conducts a systematic analysis of fermion masses and flavor mixings without relying on specific theoretical models. It introduces a general form for the 3 by 3 mass matrix expressed using the three fermion masses and several free parameters. From this, it derives the corresponding Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata mixing matrix for leptons. A chi-squared likelihood test confirms that these derived expressions match the measured neutrino mixing angles and mass differences. This suggests that the observed flavor patterns can be accommodated in a broad, assumption-light framework.

Core claim

In a model-independent context, the authors parameterize the general 3x3 mass matrix and the PMNS flavor mixing matrix in terms of the fermionic masses and some free parameters. They implement a chi-squared statistic to evaluate the theoretical expressions for the leptonic flavor mixing angles against experimental data, finding that the expressions correctly reproduce the actual experimental data on neutrino oscillations.

What carries the argument

The most general parameterization form of the 3x3 mass matrix and the derived PMNS matrix expressed in terms of masses and free parameters.

If this is right

  • The parameterization allows any observed mixing pattern to be reproduced by suitable choice of the free parameters.
  • The chi-squared fit validates the expressions specifically for the neutrino sector.
  • This approach provides a systematic way to study both quark and lepton flavor structures uniformly.
  • Direct relations between mass eigenvalues and mixing parameters emerge without model assumptions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same parameterization to the quark sector could reveal patterns linking quark and lepton masses.
  • Future precision measurements of mixing angles could further constrain the free parameters in this framework.
  • The method might help in identifying which features of the flavor puzzle require new physics beyond the standard model.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen parameterization of the 3x3 mass matrix and PMNS matrix in terms of masses plus free parameters is sufficiently general that any observed mixing pattern can be accommodated by adjusting those free parameters.

What would settle it

An experimental determination of neutrino mixing parameters that cannot be achieved for any values of the free parameters in the theoretical expressions, resulting in a poor chi-squared fit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17202 by A. Perez-Martinez, E. Barradas-Guevara, F. Gonzalez-Canales, M. Ramos-Martinez, O. Felix-Beltran, V. Luna-Mendoza.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Regions of parameters for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Parameter regions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Parameter regions for Φ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Amplification of the parameter regions for Φ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In a model-independent context, we perform a systematic and detailed study of the fermion flavor masses and mixings. In this analysis, we present a most general parameterization form of the $3 \times 3$ mass matrix, as well as the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata flavor mixing matrix, in terms of the fermionic masses and some free parameters. A likelihood test using the $\chi^2$ statistic is implemented to evaluate whether the theoretical expressions for the leptonic flavor mixing angles also reproduce the experimental data. The results of the $\chi^2$ fit show that the theoretical expressions obtained for the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata mixing matrix correctly reproduce the actual experimental data on neutrino oscillations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents a model-independent parameterization of the 3×3 fermion mass matrices and the PMNS mixing matrix expressed in terms of the three masses plus additional free parameters. It then performs a χ² likelihood fit and claims that the resulting theoretical expressions for the leptonic mixing angles reproduce the experimental neutrino oscillation data.

Significance. If the parameterization is the most general form without imposing extra relations beyond the three masses, the reported agreement with data is expected by construction once the free parameters are adjusted, providing little new insight into the flavor problem. The manuscript does not appear to deliver parameter-free derivations, machine-checked proofs, or falsifiable predictions beyond consistency with existing measurements.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the χ² fit demonstrates the theoretical PMNS expressions 'correctly reproduce' the experimental data is undermined by the use of a 'most general parameterization' containing free parameters. Without an explicit count of those parameters or demonstration that the form imposes non-trivial relations among the mixing angles, the fit success is automatic rather than a test of the expressions.
  2. [Abstract] The description of the likelihood test provides no information on the number of free parameters, the precise functional form of the mass-matrix entries, the exact experimental data points and uncertainties employed, or the resulting χ² per degree of freedom. These omissions prevent assessment of whether the approach is predictive or merely a reparameterization.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be clearer if it stated the total number of free parameters retained after imposing the three mass eigenvalues.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments below and clarify the scope and limitations of our model-independent parameterization. While we maintain that the approach provides a useful systematic framework for analyzing flavor structures, we acknowledge that certain details were insufficiently highlighted in the abstract and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the χ² fit demonstrates the theoretical PMNS expressions 'correctly reproduce' the experimental data is undermined by the use of a 'most general parameterization' containing free parameters. Without an explicit count of those parameters or demonstration that the form imposes non-trivial relations among the mixing angles, the fit success is automatic rather than a test of the expressions.

    Authors: We agree that the parameterization is constructed to be the most general form consistent with the three given fermion masses, with the additional free parameters encoding the remaining degrees of freedom in the mass matrices and mixing matrix. The χ² analysis is intended to demonstrate consistency rather than to provide a parameter-free prediction or to test non-trivial relations among the angles. The explicit functional forms derived do allow for a systematic exploration of possible flavor patterns, which can guide model building. However, we recognize that the abstract overstates the result as 'correctly reproduce' without sufficient qualification. We will revise the abstract to emphasize consistency with data after fitting the free parameters and will add an explicit statement on the number of free parameters employed in the leptonic sector. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The description of the likelihood test provides no information on the number of free parameters, the precise functional form of the mass-matrix entries, the exact experimental data points and uncertainties employed, or the resulting χ² per degree of freedom. These omissions prevent assessment of whether the approach is predictive or merely a reparameterization.

    Authors: The full manuscript (Sections 2 and 3) contains the explicit parameterization of the mass-matrix entries in terms of the three masses and the free parameters, the specific neutrino oscillation data sets and uncertainties used, and the results of the χ² minimization including best-fit values. Nevertheless, we accept that the abstract lacks these details, making it difficult to evaluate the predictive power at a glance. We will revise the abstract to include a concise mention of the number of free parameters, the data sources, and the achieved χ² per degree of freedom, while ensuring the main text already provides the full functional forms and fit results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Successful χ² fit is expected once a general parameterization with free parameters is adopted

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "A likelihood test using the χ² statistic is implemented to evaluate whether the theoretical expressions for the leptonic flavor mixing angles also reproduce the experimental data. The results of the χ² fit show that the theoretical expressions obtained for the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata mixing matrix correctly reproduce the actual experimental data on neutrino oscillations."

    The paper first states a most general parameterization of the mass matrix and PMNS matrix in terms of masses plus free parameters, obtains theoretical expressions for the mixing angles from it, and then performs a χ² fit of those free parameters to the experimental mixing data. With a parameterization claimed to be sufficiently general, any mixing pattern can be reproduced by tuning the parameters; the reported agreement is therefore forced by construction once the number of free parameters is comparable to the number of observables.

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on deriving mixing-angle expressions from a 'most general parameterization' of the 3×3 mass matrix and PMNS matrix (in terms of the three masses plus free parameters) and then showing via χ² fit that these expressions reproduce neutrino data. Because the parameterization is asserted to be general enough to accommodate any observed pattern by adjusting the free parameters, the fit success follows directly from the model's flexibility and the fitting procedure itself. This reduces the reported 'reproduction' to a tautological outcome rather than an independent test, consistent with the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the assumption that a sufficiently general parameterization of the mass and mixing matrices can be written using only the physical masses and a small number of free parameters, and that a chi-squared minimization against current data constitutes a meaningful validation of that parameterization.

free parameters (1)
  • free parameters in the mass-matrix parameterization
    The abstract states that the 3x3 mass matrix and PMNS matrix are expressed in terms of the fermionic masses and some free parameters; the number and identity of these parameters are not specified in the provided text.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The chosen parameterization spans the full space of physically allowed 3x3 mass matrices for three generations.
    Invoked when the authors claim the form is the most general parameterization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5681 in / 1490 out tokens · 42743 ms · 2026-05-20T13:33:05.450935+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Navas et al., Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navas et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001,10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  2. [2]

    Garbrecht, Why is there more matter than antimatter? Calculational methods for leptogenesis and electroweak baryogenesis, Prog

    B. Garbrecht, Why is there more matter than antimatter? Calculational methods for leptogenesis and electroweak baryogenesis, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 110 (2020) 103727,10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.103727

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.103727 2020

  3. [3]

    Weinberg, Models of lepton and quark masses, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Models of lepton and quark masses, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 035020,10.1103/PhysRevD.101.035020

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.035020 2020

  4. [4]

    Quadratization in discrete optimization and quantum mechanics,

    A. Abokhalil, The Higgs Mechanism and Higgs Boson: Unveiling the Symmetry of the Universe (2023),10.48550/arXiv. 2306.01019

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv 2023

  5. [5]

    P. Langacker, The Standard Model and Beyond, Series in high energy physics, cosmology, and gravitation (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017), URLhttps://books.google.com.mx/books?id=QHRfAQAACAAJ

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Fukuda et al., Measurements of the solar neutrino flux from Super-Kamiokande’s first 300 days, Phys

    Y. Fukuda et al., Measurements of the solar neutrino flux from Super-Kamiokande’s first 300 days, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1158,10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1158

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.1158 1998

  7. [7]

    Q. R. Ahmad et al., Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011301,10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.011301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.011301 2002

  8. [8]

    Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?, Phys

    P. Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421,10.1016/0370-2693(77) 90435-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77 1977

  9. [9]

    Aker, et al., Improved Upper Limit on the Neutrino Mass from a Direct Kinematic Method by KATRIN, Phys

    M. Aker, et al., Improved Upper Limit on the Neutrino Mass from a Direct Kinematic Method by KATRIN, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 221802,10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.221802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.221802 2019

  10. [10]

    Barradas-Guevara, et al., Lepton CP violation in aν2HDM with flavor, Phys

    E. Barradas-Guevara, et al., Lepton CP violation in aν2HDM with flavor, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 035003,10.1103/ PhysRevD.97.035003

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Jarlskog, A Basis Independent Formulation of the Connection Between Quark Mass Matrices, CP Violation and Experiment, Z

    C. Jarlskog, A Basis Independent Formulation of the Connection Between Quark Mass Matrices, CP Violation and Experiment, Z. Phys. C 29 (1985) 491,10.1007/BF01565198

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01565198 1985

  12. [12]

    Schechter and J

    J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227,10.1103/ PhysRevD.22.2227

    work page 1980

  13. [13]

    Fritzsch, Calculating the Cabibbo Angle, Phys

    H. Fritzsch, Calculating the Cabibbo Angle, Phys. Lett. B 70 (1977) 436,10.1016/0370-2693(77)90408-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90408-7 1977

  14. [14]

    Fritzsch, Quark Masses and Flavor Mixing, Nucl

    H. Fritzsch, Quark Masses and Flavor Mixing, Nucl. Phys. B 155 (1979) 189,10.1016/0550-3213(79)90362-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90362-6 1979

  15. [15]

    Gatto, G

    R. Gatto, G. Sartori, and M. Tonin, Weak Selfmasses, Cabibbo Angle, and Broken SU(2) x SU(2), Phys. Lett. B 28 (1968) 128,10.1016/0370-2693(68)90150-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(68)90150-0 1968

  16. [16]

    Fritzsch and Z.-z

    H. Fritzsch and Z.-z. Xing, Mass and flavor mixing schemes of quarks and leptons, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 45 (2000) 1, 10.1016/S0146-6410(00)00102-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0146-6410(00)00102-2 2000

  17. [17]

    G. C. Branco, L. Lavoura, and J. P. Silva, CP Violation, vol. 103 (1999),10.1093/oso/9780198503996.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/oso/9780198503996.001.0001 1999

  18. [18]

    C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen, Hierarchy of Quark Masses, Cabibbo Angles and CP Violation, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 277,10.1016/0550-3213(79)90316-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90316-x 1979

  19. [19]

    Leurer, Y

    M. Leurer, Y. Nir, and N. Seiberg, Mass matrix models, Nucl. Phys. B 398 (1993) 319,10.1016/0550-3213(93)90112-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90112-3 1993

  20. [20]

    Ramond, R

    P. Ramond, R. G. Roberts, and G. G. Ross, Stitching the Yukawa quilt, Nucl. Phys. B 406 (1993) 19,10.1016/ 0550-3213(93)90159-M

    work page 1993

  21. [21]

    G. C. Branco, D. Emmanuel-Costa, and R. Gonzalez Felipe, Texture zeros and weak basis transformations, Phys. Lett. B 477 (2000) 147,10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00193-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00193-3 2000

  22. [22]

    Bernabeu, G

    J. Bernabeu, G. C. Branco, and M. Gronau, CP Restrictions on Quark Mass Matrices, Phys. Lett. B 169 (1986) 243, 10.1016/0370-2693(86)90659-3 22

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)90659-3 1986

  23. [23]

    G. C. Branco, M. N. Rebelo, and J. I. Silva-Marcos, Large neutrino mixing with universal strength of Yukawa couplings, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 073004,10.1103/PhysRevD.62.073004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.073004 2000

  24. [24]

    Harayama and N

    K. Harayama and N. Okamura, Exact parametrization of the mass matrices and the KM matrix, Phys. Lett. B 387 (1996) 614,10.1016/0370-2693(96)01079-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)01079-9 1996

  25. [25]

    Barradas-Guevara, O

    E. Barradas-Guevara, O. F´ elix-Beltr´ an, and E. Rodr´ ıguez-J´ auregui, Trilinear self-couplings in an S(3) flavored Higgs model, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 095001,10.1103/PhysRevD.90.095001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.095001 2014

  26. [26]

    Gonz´ alez Canales, A

    F. Gonz´ alez Canales, A. Mondrag´ on, and M. Mondrag´ on, The S 3 flavour symmetry: Neutrino masses and mixings, Fortschritte der Physik 61 (2013) 546,10.1002/prop.201200121

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.201200121 2013

  27. [27]

    Gonz´ alez Canales, et al., Quark sector of S3 models: classification and comparison with experimental data, Phys

    F. Gonz´ alez Canales, et al., Quark sector of S3 models: classification and comparison with experimental data, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 096004,10.1103/PhysRevD.88.096004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.096004 2013

  28. [28]

    R. Acciarri et al., Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE): Con- ceptual Design Report, Volume 1: The LBNF and DUNE Projects (2016),10.48550/arXiv.1601.05471

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1601.05471 2016

  29. [29]

    Barradas-Guevara, O

    E. Barradas-Guevara, O. F´ elix-Beltr´ an, and F. Gonzalez-Canales, Deviation to the Tri-Bi-Maximal flavor pattern and equivalent classes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38 (2023) 2350031,10.1142/S0217751X23500318

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x23500318 2023

  30. [30]

    F´ elix-Beltr´ an, et al., Analysis of the quark sector in the 2HDM with a four-zero Yukawa texture using the most recent data on the CKM matrix, Phys

    O. F´ elix-Beltr´ an, et al., Analysis of the quark sector in the 2HDM with a four-zero Yukawa texture using the most recent data on the CKM matrix, Phys. Lett. B 742 (2015) 347,10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.003 2015

  31. [31]

    P. F. De Salas, et al., Chi2 profiles from Valencia neutrino global fit,http://globalfit.astroparticles.es/(2021), 10.5281/zenodo.4726908, URLhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4726908

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4726908 2021

  32. [32]

    P. F. de Salas, et al., 2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture, JHEP 02 (2021) 071,10.1007/ JHEP02(2021)071

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Bauer and T

    M. Bauer and T. Plehn, Yet Another Introduction to Dark Matter: The Particle Physics Approach, vol. 959 of Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer, 2019),10.1007/978-3-030-16234-4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16234-4 2019

  34. [34]

    Rigouzzo and S

    C. Rigouzzo and S. Zell, Coupling metric-affine gravity to the standard model and dark matter fermions, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 124067,10.1103/PhysRevD.108.124067

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.124067 2023

  35. [35]

    W. J. Wolf and P. G. Ferreira, Underdetermination of dark energy, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 103519,10.1103/PhysRevD. 108.103519

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2023

  36. [36]

    V. S. Mummidi, P. Lamba, and S. K. Vempati, Supersymmetry: a decade after Higgs discovery, Indian J. Phys. 97 (2023) 3315,10.1007/s12648-023-02812-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s12648-023-02812-x 2023

  37. [37]

    Antusch, et al., Singling out SO(10) GUT models using recent PTA results, Phys

    S. Antusch, et al., Singling out SO(10) GUT models using recent PTA results, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 095053,10.1103/ PhysRevD.108.095053

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results

    N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6,10.1051/ 0004-6361/201833910

    work page 2018