pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17322 · v1 · pith:3KK525R2new · submitted 2026-05-17 · ✦ hep-ph

Investigating the mass spectra of 1F-wave singly heavy Sigma_(Q), Xi^(prime)_(Q), and Ω_(Q) baryons

Ji-Si Pan , Ji-Hai Pan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 13:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords heavy baryonsmass spectra1F-wave statesRegge trajectoryquark-diquark modelorbital excitationssingly heavy baryons
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mass spectra of unobserved 1F-wave states for singly heavy baryons Σ_Q, Ξ'_Q and Ω_Q are enumerated using a quark-diquark Regge trajectory model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to calculate masses for the still-unseen 1F-wave orbital excitations (L=3) of singly heavy baryons that contain one charm or bottom quark. It treats each baryon as a heavy quark bound to a light diquark, applies Regge trajectories to fix the mass dependence on orbital angular momentum, and uses scaling rules to move between different heavy flavors. A sympathetic reader would care because these states are expected to exist but have not been found, so concrete predictions supply targets that collider experiments can search for while testing how well simple quark models describe high-angular-momentum baryons. Spin-dependent corrections are added by building a non-diagonal 6×6 mass-shift matrix from the effective Hamiltonian.

Core claim

We enumerated the mass spectra of the experimentally unobserved 1F-wave states with orbital angular momentum L = 3 for the singly heavy Σ_Q, Ξ'_Q, and Ω_Q (Q=c, b) baryons in the framework of quark-diquark configuration using the Regge trajectory model and the scaling rules. To determine the effective masses of the heavy quark and two light quarks, the relativistic effective mass formula are employed by combining the Coulomb potential. Within the spin-dependent Hamiltonian, we construct the mass shift forms as a non-diagonal symmetric 6×6 matrix for the 1F-wave states of Σ_Q, Ξ'_Q, and Ω_Q baryons.

What carries the argument

Quark-diquark Regge trajectory model that supplies the base mass for given L and permits flavor scaling to reach the unobserved 1F states.

If this is right

  • The calculated masses supply concrete benchmarks that experiments can use to search for these states.
  • Spin-dependent splittings obtained from the 6×6 matrix help classify any newly found resonances by their fine structure.
  • Scaling rules extend the same framework from charm to bottom baryons without additional free parameters.
  • The results improve the overall map of orbital excitations for singly heavy baryons.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If future measurements match the predictions, the quark-diquark picture would gain support for use at high orbital angular momentum.
  • The same Regge-plus-scaling approach could be applied to still-higher waves such as 1G states with L=4.
  • Comparison with lattice QCD simulations of these masses would provide an independent check on the effective-mass treatment.

Load-bearing premise

The relativistic effective mass formula combined with the Coulomb potential accurately determines the effective masses of the heavy quark and two light quarks for these high-L states in the quark-diquark picture.

What would settle it

An experimental observation of any 1F-wave state whose measured mass lies substantially outside the range given by the enumerated spectra would show the calculation needs revision.

read the original abstract

In this work, we enumerated the mass spectra of the experimentally unobserved $1F$-wave states with the the orbital angular momentum $L$ = 3 for the singly heavy $\Sigma_{Q}$, $\Xi^{\prime}_{Q}$, and $\Omega_{Q}$ $(Q=c, b)$ baryons in the framework of quark-diquark configuration using the Regge trajectory model and the scaling rules. To determine the effective masses of the heavy quark and two light quarks, the relativistic effective mass formula are employed by combining the Coulomb potential. Within the spin-dependent Hamiltonian, we construct the mass shift forms as a non-diagonal symmetric $6\times 6$ matrix for the $1F$-wave states of $\Sigma_{Q}$, $\Xi^{\prime}_{Q}$, and $\Omega_{Q}$ baryons. Our analysis of mass spectra provides valuable insights to guide future experimental investigations, and enhances the understanding of the spectroscopic properties of unobserved $1F$-wave orbital excitations for these singly heavy baryons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates the mass spectra of the unobserved 1F-wave (L=3) states of singly heavy baryons Σ_Q, Ξ'_Q, and Ω_Q (Q=c,b) in the quark-diquark picture. It combines the Regge trajectory model with scaling rules, determines effective masses of the heavy quark and light diquark via a relativistic formula plus Coulomb potential, and obtains spin-dependent shifts from a non-diagonal 6×6 mass matrix.

Significance. If validated, the numerical predictions would supply concrete targets for future experiments searching for these high-orbital excitations and would add to the catalog of heavy-baryon spectroscopic data. The systematic construction of the 6×6 spin-dependent matrix for the full set of 1F states is a methodical element that strengthens the presentation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model and effective-mass section] The relativistic effective mass formula combined with the Coulomb potential is used to fix the input masses that enter the Regge trajectories and the 6×6 matrix for L=3 states. No explicit check is provided that the same formula and parameters reproduce known masses of lower-L states (e.g., 1P or 1D) before the extrapolation; the L(L+1) centrifugal barrier grows substantially at L=3 and could alter the average separation, making this a load-bearing assumption for the central numerical claims.
  2. [Results section] The manuscript reports predicted masses without accompanying uncertainties, error estimates, or tables of the fitted Regge slopes, intercepts, and scaling-rule parameters. Because the outputs depend directly on these fitted quantities, the absence of sensitivity analysis or error propagation weakens the reliability assessment of the 1F-wave results.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the states are 'enumerated' but does not indicate how many J^P states per flavor are computed or whether all members of the 1F multiplet are included.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which help improve the clarity and reliability of our results. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the next version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model and effective-mass section] The relativistic effective mass formula combined with the Coulomb potential is used to fix the input masses that enter the Regge trajectories and the 6×6 matrix for L=3 states. No explicit check is provided that the same formula and parameters reproduce known masses of lower-L states (e.g., 1P or 1D) before the extrapolation; the L(L+1) centrifugal barrier grows substantially at L=3 and could alter the average separation, making this a load-bearing assumption for the central numerical claims.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit validation of the effective-mass formula and parameters on lower-L states would strengthen the extrapolation to L=3. Although the relativistic formula and Coulomb term are applied consistently with the same parameters across orbital excitations, we will add a dedicated paragraph and a supplementary table in the revised manuscript that compares our model's predictions for the known 1P and 1D states of Σ_Q, Ξ'_Q, and Ω_Q with experimental masses and other theoretical calculations. This check will quantify any systematic effects from the centrifugal barrier before presenting the 1F results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section] The manuscript reports predicted masses without accompanying uncertainties, error estimates, or tables of the fitted Regge slopes, intercepts, and scaling-rule parameters. Because the outputs depend directly on these fitted quantities, the absence of sensitivity analysis or error propagation weakens the reliability assessment of the 1F-wave results.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current version lacks a clear presentation of the fitted parameters and associated uncertainties. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new table listing the Regge slopes, intercepts, and scaling-rule parameters obtained from the fits, together with the numerical values of the effective quark and diquark masses. We will also add a short sensitivity analysis that varies the input parameters within their physically motivated ranges and reports the resulting spread in the predicted 1F masses as estimated uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies standard models to new states

full rationale

The paper determines effective masses via the relativistic effective mass formula combined with Coulomb potential, then applies the Regge trajectory model and scaling rules within a quark-diquark framework to enumerate masses for unobserved 1F-wave (L=3) states of Σ_Q, Ξ'_Q, and Ω_Q baryons. It constructs a 6x6 spin-dependent mass-shift matrix for these states. This constitutes a standard phenomenological extrapolation from known lower-L data to new high-L excitations rather than any self-definitional loop, fitted input renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. The outputs for unobserved states are not equivalent to the inputs by construction; the model assumptions (effective masses, Regge trajectories) remain independent of the specific 1F predictions and are externally falsifiable against future experiments. No quoted reduction in the provided text shows a central claim collapsing to a prior fit or self-citation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on effective quark masses obtained from a relativistic formula plus Coulomb term, plus the assumption that the quark-diquark picture remains valid at L=3; these are standard but introduce fitted or chosen parameters without independent first-principles derivation shown in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • effective masses of heavy and light quarks
    Determined via relativistic effective mass formula combined with Coulomb potential; values are chosen or fitted to reproduce known properties before applying to 1F states.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quark-diquark configuration remains valid for L=3 orbital excitations
    Invoked as the modeling framework for Σ_Q, Ξ'_Q, and Ω_Q baryons.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5719 in / 1345 out tokens · 45288 ms · 2026-05-20T13:18:48.164463+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Navaset al

    S. Navaset al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Averyet al

    P. Averyet al. (CLEO Collaboration), Observation of a narrow state decaying into Ξ + c π−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4364 (1995). [arXiv:9508010 [hep-ex]]

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Gibbonset al

    L. Gibbonset al. (CLEO Collaboration), Observation of an excited charmed baryon decaying into Ξ0 cπ+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 810 (1996)

    work page 1996

  4. [4]

    Aubertet al

    B. Aubertet al. (BABAR Collaboration), Observation of an excited charm baryon Ω ∗ c decaying to Ω0 cγ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 232001 (2006). [arXiv:0608055 [hep-ex]]

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    V. M. Abazovet al. (D0 Collaboration), Observation of the doubly strangebbaryon Ω − b , Phys. Rev. 20 Lett. 101, 232002 (2008). [arXiv:0808.4142 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    First Observation of Heavy Baryons \Sigma_b and \Sigma_b^*

    T. Aaltonenet al. (CDF Collaboration), Observation of the heavy baryons Σ b and Σ∗ b, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 202001 (2007). [arXiv:0706.3868 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  7. [7]

    Observation of two new $\Xi_b^-$ baryon resonances

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of two new Ξ − b baryon resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 062004 (2015). [arXiv:1411.4849 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    Measurement of the properties of the $\Xi_b^{*0}$ baryon

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the properties of the Ξ ∗0 b baryon, JHEP 05, 161 (2016). [arXiv:1604.03896 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Observation of five new narrow $\Omega_c^0$ states decaying to $\Xi_c^+ K^-$

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of five new narrow Ω 0 c states decaying to Ξ + c K −, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 182001 (2017). [arXiv:1703.04639 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Observation of Excited $\Omega_c$ Charmed Baryons in $e^+e^-$ Collisions

    J. Yeltonet al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of excited Ω c charmed baryons ine +e− collisions, Phys. Rev. D 97, 051102 (2018). [arXiv:1711.07927 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), First observation of excited Ω − b states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 082002 (2020). [arXiv:2001.00851 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of new Ω 0 c states decaying to the Ξ + c K − final state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 131902 (2023). [arXiv:2302.04733 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Mizuket al

    R. Mizuket al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of an isotriplet of excited charmed baryons decaying to Λ+ c π, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 122002 (2005). [[arXiv:0412069 [hep-ex]]]

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    Aubertet al

    B. Aubertet al. (BaBar Collaboration), Measurements ofB( ¯B0 →Λ + c ¯p) andB(B− →Λ + c ¯pπ−) and studies of Λ + c π− resonances, Phys. Rev. D 78, 112003 (2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    Aaijet al

    R. Aaijet al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of new Ξ 0 c baryons decaying to Λ + c K −, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 222001 (2020). [arXiv:2003.13649 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Maltman and N

    K. Maltman and N. Isgur, Baryons with strangeness and charm in a quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1701 (1980)

    work page 1980

  17. [17]

    Heavy Baryons in a Quark Model

    W. Roberts and M. Pervin, Heavy baryons in a quark model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23, 2817 (2008). [arXiv:0711.2492 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    Spectrum of heavy baryons in the quark model

    T. Yoshida, E. Hiyama, A. Hosaka, M. Oka, and K. Sadato, Spectrum of heavy baryons in the quark model, Phys. Rev. D 92, 114029 (2015). [arXiv:1510.01067 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    Pan and J

    J-H. Pan and J. Pan, Investigation of the mass spectra of singly heavy baryons Σ Q, Ξ ′ Q, and Ω Q (Q=c, b) in the Regge trajectory model, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076010 (2024). [arXiv:2308.11769 [hep- ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    K. Chen, Y. Dong, X. Liu, Q-F. L¨ u, and T. Matsuki, Regge-like relation and a universal description of heavy-light systems, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 20 (2018). [arXiv:1709.07196 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Capstick and N

    S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Baryons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2809 (1986)

    work page 1986

  22. [22]

    Migura, D

    S. Migura, D. Merten, B. Metsch, and H-R. Petry, Charmed baryons in a relativistic quark model, Eur. Phys. J. A 28, 41 (2006).. [arXiv:0602153 [hep-ph]]

    work page 2006

  23. [23]

    Yu, Z.-Y

    G.-L. Yu, Z.-Y. Li, Z.-G. Wang, L. Jie, and Y. Meng, Systematic analysis of single heavy baryons Λ Q, 21 ΣQ, and Ω Q, Nucl. Phys. B 990, 116183 (2023). [arXiv:2206.08128 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Bahtiyar, K

    H. Bahtiyar, K. U. Can, G. Erkol, P. Gubler, M. Oka, and T. T. Takahashi, Charmed baryon spectrum from lattice QCD near the physical point, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054513 (2020). [arXiv:2004.08999 [hep-lat]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Z. S. Brown, W. Detmold, S. Meinel, and K. Orginos, Charmed bottom baryon spectroscopy from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 90, 094507 (2014). [arXiv:1409.0497 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Heavy-baryon quark model picture from lattice QCD

    J. Vijande, A. Valcarce, and H. Garcilazo, Heavy-baryon quark model picture from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 90, 094004 (2014). [arXiv:1507.03736 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Jakhad, J

    P. Jakhad, J. Oudichhya, and A. K. Rai, Interpretation of recently discovered single bottom baryons in the relativistic flux tube model, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094005 (2024). [arXiv:2407.01655 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Xiao, K-L

    L-Y. Xiao, K-L. Wang, M-S. Liu, and X-H. Zhong, Possible interpretation of the newly observed Ω b states, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 279 (2020). [arXiv:2001.05110 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, TheS- andP-wave low-lying baryons in the chiral quark model, Few Body Syst. 59, 113 (2018). [arXiv:1709.09315 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    $D$-wave heavy baryons of the $SU(3)$ flavor $\mathbf{6}_F$

    Q. Mao, H-X. Chen, A. Hosaka, X. Liu, and S-L. Zhu,D-wave heavy baryons of theSU(3) flavor 6 F , Phys. Rev. D 96, 074021 (2017). [arXiv:1707.03712 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Gandhi and A

    K. Gandhi and A. K. Rai, Spectrum of strange singly charmed baryons in the constituent quark model, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 213 (2020). [arXiv:1911.11039 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Roncaglia, D

    R. Roncaglia, D. B. Lichtenberg, and E.Predazzi, Predicting the masses of baryons containing one or two heavy quarks, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1722 (1995). [arXiv:9502251 [hep-ph]]

    work page 1995

  33. [33]

    Masses of excited heavy baryons in the relativistic quark-diquark picture

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Masses of excited heavy baryons in the relativistic quark- diquark picture, Phys. Lett. B 659, 612 (2008). [arXiv:0705.2957 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  34. [34]

    L. X. Guti´ errez-Guerrero, A. Raya, L. Albino, and R. J. Hern´ andez-Pinto, First radial excitations of baryons in a contact interaction: mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074015 (2024). [arXiv:2409.06057 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Garc´ ıa-Tecocoatzi, A

    H. Garc´ ıa-Tecocoatzi, A. Giachino, A. Ramirez-Morales, A. Rivero-Acosta, E. Santopinto, and C.A. Vaquera-Araujo, Study of the spectra and decay widths of singly heavy baryons, EPJ. Web. Conf 303, 01009 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    D´ avila-Rivera, H

    A. D´ avila-Rivera, H. Garc´ ıa-Tecocoatzi, A. Ramirez-Morales, A. Rivero-Acosta, E. Santopinto, C. A. Vaquera-Araujo, Radiative decays of the Σ c, Ξ ′ c, and Ω c charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 113, 093001 (2026). [arXiv:2512.03008 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Towards an understanding of heavy baryon spectroscopy

    A. Valcarce, H. Garcilazo, and J. Vijande, Towards an understanding of heavy baryon spectroscopy, Eur. Phys. J. A 37, 217 (2008). [arXiv:0807.2973 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [38]

    Spectroscopy and Regge trajectories of heavy baryons in the relativistic quark-diquark picture

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Spectroscopy and Regge trajectories of heavy baryons in the relativistic quark-diquark picture, Phys. Rev. D 84, 014025 (2011). [arXiv:1105.0583 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    Zhang and S-Q

    Z-L. Zhang and S-Q. Luo, Spectroscopic properties of 1F-wave singly bottom baryons, Phys. Rev. D 112, 074020 (2025). [arXiv:2504.17507 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    LaCourse and M

    D. LaCourse and M. G. Olsson, String potential model: spinless quarks, Phys. Rev. D 39, 2751 (1989). 22

    work page 1989

  41. [41]

    Assignments of $\Lambda_Q$ and $\Xi_Q$ baryons in the heavy quark-light diquark picture

    B. Chen, K-W Wei, and A. Zhang, Investigation of ΛQ and ΞQ baryons in the heavy quark-light diquark picture, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 82 (2015). [arXiv:1406.6561 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Spectroscopy and Regge trajectories of heavy quarkonia and B_c mesons

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V. O. Galkin, Spectroscopy and Regge trajectories of heavy quarkonia andB c mesons, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1825 (2011). [arXiv:1111.0454 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  43. [43]

    Pan and J-S

    J-H. Pan and J-S. Pan, Study of the mass spectra of doubly heavy Ξ QQ′ and ΩQQ′ baryons, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1009(2025). [arXiv:2502.01088 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Prospects for observing the lowest-lying odd-parity $\Sigma_c$ and $\Sigma_b$ baryons

    M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Prospects for observing the lowest-lying odd-parity Σ c and Σb baryons, Phys. Rev. D 92, 074026 (2015). [arXiv:1506.01702 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  45. [45]

    Very narrow excited $\Omega_c$ baryons

    M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Very narrow excited Ω c baryons, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114012 (2017). [arXiv:1703.07774 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [46]

    A. Ali, I. Ahmed, M. J. Aslam, A. Y. Parkhomenko, and A. Rehman, Mass spectrum of the hidden- charm pentaquarks in the compact diquark model, JHEP, 10, 256 (2019). [arXiv:1907.06507 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Quantum Numbers of $\Omega_c$ States and Other Charmed Baryons

    H-Y. Cheng and C-W. Chiang, Quantum numbers of Ω c states and other charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 95, 094018 (2017). [arXiv:1704.00396 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    Oudichhya, K

    J. Oudichhya, K. Gandhi, and A. K. Rai, Mass-spectra of singly, doubly, and triply bottom baryons, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114027 (2021). [arXiv:2111.00236 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    Suenaga and M

    D. Suenaga and M. Oka, Fate of Σ Q, Ξ ′ Q and Ω Q baryons at high temperature with chiral-symmetry restoration, Phys. Rev. D 111, 074032 (2025). [arXiv:2411.12172 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    R. V. Patel, M. Shah, S. Patel, and B. Pandya, Singly heavy omega baryon spectroscopy in the relativistic framework of an independent quark model, Phys. Rev. D 112, 056025 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Luo and X

    S-Q. Luo and X. Liu, Investigating the spectroscopy behavior of undetected 1F-wave charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034002 (2023). [arXiv:2306.04588 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Peng, S-Q

    Y-X. Peng, S-Q. Luo, and X. Liu, Refining radiative decay studies in singly heavy baryons, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074034 (2024). [arXiv:2405.12812 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Z. Shah, K. Thakkar, A. K. Rai, and P. C. Vinodkumar, Mass spectra and Regge trajectories of Λ + c , Σ0 c, Ξ0 c and Ω0 c Baryons, Chin. Phys. C 40, 123102 (2016). [arXiv:1609.08464 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    Z-Y. Li, G-L. Yu, Z-G. Wang, J-Z. Gu, and J. Lu, Systematic analysis of strange single heavy baryons Ξc and Ξb, Chin. Phys. C 47, 073105 (2023). [arXiv:2207.04167 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023