pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17462 · v1 · pith:XIWOYPP3new · submitted 2026-05-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Geometry-Driven Nonlinear Orbital Magnetoelectric Effect

Jinxiong Jia , Zhenhua Qiao , Jian Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 22:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords nonlinear orbital magnetoelectric effectcentrosymmetric materialsorbital magnetizationsemiclassical theorygauge invariancetwo-dimensional systemsrelaxation time dependence
0
0 comments X

The pith

A nonlinear orbital magnetoelectric effect generates orbital magnetization quadratically in centrosymmetric materials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes and derives a nonlinear orbital magnetoelectric effect that produces orbital magnetization in response to an applied electric field squared, even in materials with inversion symmetry where any linear orbital magnetoelectric effect must vanish. An extended semiclassical theory of electron dynamics is used to obtain a fully gauge-invariant microscopic expression that cleanly separates intrinsic contributions, independent of scattering, from extrinsic ones that vary with relaxation time. This separation supplies a practical experimental test via the distinct scattering dependence of each part. In two-dimensional geometries the effect escapes many of the rotational-symmetry constraints that suppress the linear counterpart, thereby widening the pool of accessible materials. The size of the response is shown to lie within the reach of present-day magneto-optical Kerr measurements.

Core claim

The authors derive a gauge-invariant microscopic theory for a nonlinear orbital magnetoelectric effect using an extended semiclassical formulation. This effect generates orbital magnetization quadratically with the applied electric field in centrosymmetric materials. The dominant microscopic contributions arise from a Hermitian-connection structure, and the theory separates intrinsic and extrinsic parts with distinct relaxation-time dependences.

What carries the argument

Hermitian-connection structure that governs the dominant contributions to the nonlinear orbital magnetoelectric response

If this is right

  • Orbital magnetization becomes inducible by electric fields in centrosymmetric materials where the linear orbital magnetoelectric effect is symmetry-forbidden.
  • Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to the nonlinear response can be separated experimentally through their contrasting dependence on relaxation time.
  • Two-dimensional systems face substantially weaker out-of-plane rotational symmetry restrictions, enlarging the set of candidate materials.
  • The magnitude of the effect falls inside the detection window of current magneto-optical Kerr techniques.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Electric control of orbital magnetism may become feasible in a broader class of symmetric crystals without deliberate inversion-symmetry breaking.
  • Analogous geometric structures could govern other nonlinear orbital responses in centrosymmetric conductors.

Load-bearing premise

The extended semiclassical description of electron motion remains accurate and free of gauge ambiguities when applied to nonlinear orbital responses.

What would settle it

Measurement of orbital magnetization that grows quadratically with electric-field strength in a centrosymmetric two-dimensional sample, accompanied by a scattering-rate dependence that matches the predicted intrinsic-versus-extrinsic split.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17462 by Jian Wang, Jinxiong Jia, Zhenhua Qiao.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) illustrates the band dispersion, highlight￾ing two Dirac points along the high-symmetry path X-M. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a nonlinear orbital magnetoelectric effect, which generates orbital magnetization quadratically in centrosymmetric materials where the linear orbital magnetoelectric effect is strictly forbidden. Using extended semiclassical formulation, we derive a gauge-invariant microscopic theory that separates intrinsic and extrinsic contributions and establishes their distinct dependence on the relaxation time, providing an experimental discriminator. In two-dimensional systems the nonlinear response is far less constrained by out-of-plane rotational symmetries than the linear orbital magnetoelectric effect, substantially enlarging the materials platform. Microscopically, the dominant contributions are governed by a Hermitian-connection structure. Finally, we estimate that the magnitude of the nonlinear orbital magnetoelectric effect lies within the sensitivity of state-of-the-art magneto-optical Kerr measurements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a geometry-driven nonlinear orbital magnetoelectric effect that induces orbital magnetization quadratic in the applied electric field within centrosymmetric materials, where symmetry forbids the linear orbital magnetoelectric effect. Employing an extended semiclassical formulation, the authors develop a gauge-invariant microscopic theory that distinguishes intrinsic contributions (dependent on Berry connection and independent of relaxation time) from extrinsic ones (relaxation-time dependent), offering an experimental means to discriminate between them. They further demonstrate that in two-dimensional systems, this nonlinear response faces fewer constraints from out-of-plane rotational symmetries than its linear counterpart, thereby broadening the range of accessible materials. The dominant terms are shown to arise from a Hermitian-connection structure, and numerical estimates indicate that the effect's magnitude falls within the detection limits of current magneto-optical Kerr effect measurements.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, this work is significant for mesoscopic physics and spintronics. It extends orbital magnetoelectric phenomena to the nonlinear regime in centrosymmetric systems, substantially enlarging the materials platform especially in 2D where symmetry constraints relax. The separation of intrinsic (τ-independent) and extrinsic (τ-dependent) contributions supplies a concrete experimental discriminator via relaxation-time dependence. The identification of a Hermitian-connection structure provides new geometric insight into nonlinear responses. The magnitude estimates linked to Kerr measurements strengthen experimental relevance and falsifiability.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3] §3 (extended semiclassical derivation of quadratic orbital magnetization): The assertion that the extended semiclassical equations remain gauge-invariant at quadratic order in E, enabling a clean separation of intrinsic (Berry-connection, τ-independent) and extrinsic (τ-dependent) channels, is central to the claims of an experimental discriminator and 2D symmetry enlargement. This requires explicit cross-validation against the Kubo formalism for the nonlinear orbital response to rule out additional gauge-dependent pieces from second-order velocity or interband coherence terms. Without such a check, the separation and resulting predictions rest on an unverified assumption.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2: The phrase 'Hermitian-connection structure' is used without a brief definition or link to standard Berry-connection literature; adding one sentence of clarification would aid readers unfamiliar with the geometric formulation.
  2. [§4] §4 (symmetry analysis): An explicit comparison table of allowed tensor components for linear versus nonlinear orbital ME under representative 2D point groups would make the claim of 'substantially enlarging the materials platform' more concrete and easier to verify.
  3. [References] References: Foundational papers on linear orbital magnetoelectric effects and semiclassical expansions should be cited to better contextualize the nonlinear extension.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and constructive report, which recognizes the significance of the nonlinear orbital magnetoelectric effect for mesoscopic physics and its experimental accessibility. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (extended semiclassical derivation of quadratic orbital magnetization): The assertion that the extended semiclassical equations remain gauge-invariant at quadratic order in E, enabling a clean separation of intrinsic (Berry-connection, τ-independent) and extrinsic (τ-dependent) channels, is central to the claims of an experimental discriminator and 2D symmetry enlargement. This requires explicit cross-validation against the Kubo formalism for the nonlinear orbital response to rule out additional gauge-dependent pieces from second-order velocity or interband coherence terms. Without such a check, the separation and resulting predictions rest on an unverified assumption.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this insightful comment on the central technical point. The extended semiclassical equations are constructed using gauge-covariant velocities and Berry-connection terms that are invariant under U(1) gauge transformations by design; this covariance holds order by order in the electric-field expansion because the underlying semiclassical Hamiltonian and equations of motion are derived from the quantum Liouville equation in the presence of a Berry phase. The intrinsic (τ-independent) pieces arise exclusively from the geometric Hermitian-connection contributions, while extrinsic pieces enter through the relaxation-time-dependent scattering terms in the Boltzmann transport. Although a full second-order Kubo calculation of orbital magnetization would indeed be more complete, it is technically demanding and has not been performed for this geometry-driven nonlinear response in the literature. Our linear-order results recover known orbital magnetoelectric effects that have already been validated against Kubo formulas in prior works. In the revised manuscript we will add a concise paragraph in §3 that explicitly demonstrates the gauge transformation properties of the quadratic terms and notes the consistency with linear-order benchmarks, thereby strengthening the justification for the separation without performing an exhaustive new Kubo computation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained from extended semiclassical starting point

full rationale

The paper derives the nonlinear orbital magnetoelectric effect using an extended semiclassical formulation to obtain a gauge-invariant theory that separates intrinsic and extrinsic contributions with distinct relaxation-time dependence. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or unverified self-citation chains. The central claims follow from the stated starting formulation and symmetry considerations rather than being presupposed or renamed from the target result. This is the normal case of an independent derivation against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the extended semiclassical approach and the assumption that relaxation-time dependence cleanly separates intrinsic and extrinsic channels; no free parameters or new entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Extended semiclassical formulation yields a gauge-invariant microscopic theory for the nonlinear orbital response
    Invoked to derive the separation of intrinsic and extrinsic contributions and their distinct relaxation-time scalings.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5639 in / 1190 out tokens · 32035 ms · 2026-05-19T22:52:00.852363+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (6) We further define ¯gab nm = − iLa nmrb mn/ǫ nm = ¯Gab nm − i ¯Ω ab nm/ 2 and ¯Ccab nm = − Re [ iLc nmDa mnrb mn ] /ǫ nm

    are defined as N αab nm = F αab nm + F aαb nm ǫ2 nm + ¯vb mn Ω αa nm ǫ3 nm , (5) Lαab nm = F αab nm ǫnm + Ω αa nm¯vb mn ǫ2 nm . (6) We further define ¯gab nm = − iLa nmrb mn/ǫ nm = ¯Gab nm − i ¯Ω ab nm/ 2 and ¯Ccab nm = − Re [ iLc nmDa mnrb mn ] /ǫ nm. These quantities share the same structural form as gab nm and Cαab nm , except that the velocity operator ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    ic", "d", and

    yields the extrinsic NOME contribution, χ (1) c;ab = χ (1,od ) c;ab + χ (1,ic ) c;ab + χ (1,d ) c;ab , with its components defined as χ (1,od ) c;ab = − τ ∑ nm fn∂ a ¯Ω cb nm, (7) χ (1,ic ) c;ab = − τ εcαβ ∑ n fn∂ a [ Gαb nmvβ n ǫnm ] , (8) χ (1,d ) c;ab = τ 2 εcαβ ∑ nm fn∂ a [ ¯vβ nmGαb nm ǫnm + Cβαb nm ] . (9) Similarly, "ic", "d", and "od" represent the...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Remarkably, its intrinsic contribution can be both T -even and P-even contribution, and may there- fore remain finite even in systems without SOC

    with AC wavepacket formalism [ 33], one can also derive a high-frequency NOME. Remarkably, its intrinsic contribution can be both T -even and P-even contribution, and may there- fore remain finite even in systems without SOC. To conclude, we have developed a microscopic theory of NOME, identifying the Hermitian-connection contri- bution as the primary sour...

    work page

  4. [4]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S. C. Zhang, Orbi- tronics: The Intrinsic Orbital Current in p-Doped Sili- con, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 066601 (2005)

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim and H. W. Lee, Intrinsic Spin and Orbital Hall Effects from Orbital Texture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Go, and H

    D. Go, and H. W. Lee, Orbital torque: Torque generation by orbital current injection, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013177 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    R. B. Atencia, A. Agarwal, and D. Culcer, Orbital an- gular momentum of Bloch electrons: equilibrium formu- lation, magnetoelectric phenomena, and the orbital Hall effect, Advances in Physics: X 9, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Johansson, Theory of spin and orbital Edelstein ef- fects, J

    A. Johansson, Theory of spin and orbital Edelstein ef- fects, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36, 423002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    P. Wang, F. Chen, Y. Yang, S. Hu, Y. Li, W. Wang, D. Zhang, and Y. Jiang, Orbitronics: Mechanisms, Materi- als, and Devices, Adv. Electron. Mater. 11, 5 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Fukami, K

    S. Fukami, K. J. Lee, and M. Kläui, Challenges and op- portunities for orbitronics, arXiv:2509.23954

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintron- ics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. Železný, I. M. Miron, T. Jung- wirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    T. P. Cysne, L. M. Canonico, M. Costa, R. B. Muniz, and T. G. Rappoport, Orbitronics in two-dimensional mate- rials, npj Spintronics 3, 39 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Lyalin, S

    I. Lyalin, S. Alikhah, M. Berritta, P. M. Oppe- neer, and R. K. Kawakami, Magneto-Optical De- tection of the Orbital Hall Effect in Chromium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 156702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    G. Sala, H. Wang, W. Legrand, and P. Gambardella, Or- bital Hanel Magnetoresistance in a 3d Transition Metal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 156703 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Y. G. Choi, D. Jo, K. H. Ko, D. Go, K. H. Kim, H. G. Park, C. Kim, B. C. Min, G. M. Choi, and H. W. Lee, Observation of orbital Hall effect in a light metal Ti, Nature, 619, 52 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Liu, and D

    H. Liu, and D. Culcer, Dominance of Extrinsic Scatter- ing Mechanisms in the Orbital Hall Effect: Graphene, Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, and Topological Anti- ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 186302 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Tang, and G

    P. Tang, and G. E. W. Bauer, Role of Dis- order in the Intrinsic Orbital Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 186302 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Veneri, T

    A. Veneri, T. G. Rappoport, and A. Ferreira, Extrin- sic Orbital Hall Effect: Orbital Skew Scattering and Crossover between Diffusive and Intrinsic Orbital Trans- port, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 136201 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    H. Liu, J. H. Cullen, D. P. Arovas, and D. Cul- cer, Quantum Correction to the Orbital Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 036304 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 365, 605 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Serlin, C

    M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu , K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moiré het- erostructure, Science 367, 900 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    W. Y. He, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, and K. T. Law, Gi- ant orbital magnetoelectric effect and current-induced magnetization switching in twisted bilayer graphene, Nat. Commun. 11, 1650 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Huang, N

    C. Huang, N. Li, and A. H. MacDonald, Current- Driven Magnetization Reversal in Orbital Chern Insu- lators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 056801 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    C. Xiao, H. Liu, J. Zhao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Ther- moelectric generation of orbital magnetization in metals, Phys. Rev. B 103, 045401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Cullen, D

    J. Cullen, D. Arovas, R. Raimondi, and D. Culcer, Quantum geometry and dipolar dynamics in the orbital magneto-electric effect, arXiv:2505.02911

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    X. B. Qiang, T. Liu, H. Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, 6 Quantum geometric origin of orbital magnetization, Appl. Phys. Lett. 128, 010501 (2026)

    work page 2026

  28. [28]

    The response tensor of OME is defined as Ma = χ a;bEb, which is a rank-2 pseudo-tensor. In the 2D materials in xy plane, only the orbital magnetization Mz induced by in-plane electric field is relevant, thus the response tensor reduces to two independent components χ z;x and χ z;y. These two components are forbidden by symmetries P, C z 2 , Mz, C z 3,4,6, S...

    work page

  29. [29]

    J. E. Sipe and A. I. Shkrebtii, Second-order optical re- sponse in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 61, 5337 (2000)

    work page 2000

  30. [30]

    A. Pezo, D. G. Ovalle, and A. Manchon, Orbital Hall effect in crystals: Interatomic versus intra-atomic contri - butions, Phys. Rev. B 106, 104414 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    C. Xiao, H. Liu, W. Wu, H. Wang, Q. Niu, and S. Y. A. Yang, Intrinsic Nonlinear Elec- tric Spin Generation in Centrosymmetric Magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 086602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Y. Gao, S. Y. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Field Induced Posi- tional Shift of Bloch Electrons and Its Dynamical Impli- cations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 166601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Xiang, C

    L. Xiang, C. Zhang, L. Wang, and J. Wang, Third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect with generalized semiclas- sical theory, Phys. Rev. B 107, 075411 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    J. Jia, L. Xiang, Z. Qiao, and J. Wang, Nonlinear Mag- netoelectric Edelstein Effect arXiv:2507.23415

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    H. Wang, H. Liu, X. Feng, J. Cao, W. Wu, S. Lai, W. Gao, C. Xiao, and S. A. Yang, Intrinsic Nonlinear Spin Hall Effect and Manipulation of Perpendicular Magneti- zation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 056301 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    J. Jia, L. Xiang, Z. Qiao, and J. Wang, Equivalence of semiclassical and response theories for second-order non- linear ac Hall effects, Phys. Rev. B 110, 245406 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    See Supplemental Material for derivation details base d on extended wavepacket theory and the symmetry analysis of the MPGs in 2D systems

    work page

  38. [38]

    D. Xiao, M. C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry Phase Effects on Electronic Properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  39. [39]

    C. Xiao, J. Cao, Q. Niu, and S. A. Yang, Proper Definition of Intrinsic Nonlinear Current, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 256306 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    H. Liu, J. Zhao, Y. X. Huang, X. Feng, C. Xiao, W. Wu, S. Lai, W. Gao, and S. A. Yang, Berry connec- tion polarizability tensor and third-order Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 105, 045118 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    D. Xiao, J. Shi, and Q. Niu, Berry Phase Cor- rection to Electron Density of States in Solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137204 (2005)

    work page 2005

  42. [42]

    Thonhauser, D

    T. Thonhauser, D. Ceresoli, D. Vanderbilt, and R. Resta, Orbital Magnetization in Periodic Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137205 (2005)

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    J. Shi, G. Vignale, D. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Quantum Theory of Orbital Magnetization and Its Generalization to Inter- acting Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 197202 (2007)

    work page 2007

  44. [44]

    Xiao, and Q

    C. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Unified bulk semiclassical the- ory for intrinsic thermal and magnetization currents, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235430 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    T. Yoda, T. Yokayama, and S. Murakami, Current- induced Orbital and Spin Magnetizations in Crystals with Helical Structure, Sci. Rep. 5, 12024 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Zhong, J

    S. Zhong, J. E. Moore, and I. Souza, Gyrotropic Magnetic Effect and the Magnetic Moment on the Fermi Surface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 077201 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    J. Ahn, G. Y. Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath Riemannian geometry of resonant optical responses, Nat. Phys. 18, 290 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Xiang, J

    L. Xiang, J. Jia F. Xu, Z. Qiao, and J. Wang, Intrin- sic Gytropic Magnetic Current from Zeeman Quantum Geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 116301 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    A. Gao, N. Nagaosa, N. Ni, and S. Y. Xu, Quantum Geometry Phenomena in Condensed Matter Physics, arXiv:2508 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Sodemann, and L

    I. Sodemann, and L. Fu, Quantum Nonlinear Hall Effect Induced by Berry Curvature Dipole in Time-Reversal In- variant Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216806 (2015)

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    C. Xiao, W. Wu, H. Wang, Y. X. Huang, X. Feng, H. Liu, G. Y. Guo, Q. Niu, and S. A. Yang, Time- Reversal-Even Nonlinear Current Induced Spin Polariza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 166302 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Xiang, H

    L. Xiang, H. Jin, and J. Wang, Spin Trans- port Revealed by Spin Quantum Geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 146303 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Con- ventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetries, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Haldane model, where broken time-reversal ( T ) symmetry allows a finite intrinsic NOME

    This constraint does not apply to orbital Chern insula- tors, i.e. Haldane model, where broken time-reversal ( T ) symmetry allows a finite intrinsic NOME

    work page

  55. [55]

    I. Baek, S. Han, S. Cheon, and H. W. Lee, Nonlinear or- bital and spin Edelstein effect in centrosymmetric metals, npj Spintronics 2, 33 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    X. B. Qiang, X. Liu, H. Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Quantum Christoffel Nonlinear Magnetization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 056301 (2026)

    work page 2026

  57. [57]

    X. Qian, X. B. Qiang, W. Zhu, Y. Huang, Y. Chen, H. Z. Lu, Y. Ji, and K. Wang, Probing quantum geometric nonlinear magnetization via second-harmonic magneto- optical Kerr effect, Phys. Rev. B 113, L041407 (2026)

    work page 2026

  58. [58]

    R. E. Newnham, Properties of materials: anisotropy, symmetry, structure (Oxford university press, 2005)

    work page 2005

  59. [59]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z2 Topologi- cal Order and the Quantum Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005)

    work page 2005

  60. [60]

    H. Pan, Z. Li, C. C. Liu, G. Zhu, Z. Qiao, and Y. Yao, Valley-Polarized Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in Sil- icene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 106802 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    Liu, Two-dimensional topological insulators: Past , present and future, Coshare Sci

    F. Liu, Two-dimensional topological insulators: Past , present and future, Coshare Sci. 02, 01 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Hasegawa, Surface and edge states of quantum mate- rials, Coshare Science 03, 01 (2025)

    S. Hasegawa, Surface and edge states of quantum mate- rials, Coshare Science 03, 01 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Železný, J. Sinova, and T. Jung- wirth, Electric Control of Dirac Quasiparti- cles by Spin-Orbit Torque in a Antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 106402 (2017)

    work page 2017

  64. [64]

    Salemi, M

    L. Salemi, M. Berritta, A. K. Nandy, and P. M. Oppeneer, Orbitally dominated Rashba-Edelstein effect in noncentrosymmetric antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 5381 (2019)

    work page 2019