pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17722 · v1 · pith:S6HP4XNCnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Ferroelectric polarization controlled orbital Hall conductivity in a higher-order topological insulator: textit{d1T}-phase monolayer MoS₂

Yingjie Hu , Heng Gao , Wei Ren This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 22:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords higher-order topological insulatorferroelectric polarizationorbital Hall conductivityd1T-phase MoS2monolayer transition metal dichalcogenidecorner statesorbitronicstopological invariants
0
0 comments X

The pith

The direction of ferroelectric polarization in d1T-phase monolayer MoS2 can switch the sign of its orbital Hall conductivity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper predicts that monolayer d1T-phase MoS2 is a higher-order topological insulator that also exhibits ferroelectricity. It demonstrates the nontrivial topological index through the presence of corner states carrying quantized fractional charge inside the bulk gap. A nonzero orbital Hall conductivity plateau appears within the energy gap as a signature of the higher-order topology. The central result is that reversing the ferroelectric polarization direction flips the orbital Hall conductivity between positive and negative values. This establishes a route to electric-field control of the orbital Hall effect in a single material.

Core claim

The monolayer d1T-phase MoS2 is a higher-order topological insulator that possesses ferroelectric characteristics. The direction of its spontaneous polarization modulates the orbital Hall conductivity, switching the sign of σ_OH^x while preserving the nonzero plateau inside the topological gap. Corner states with quantized fractional charge confirm the higher-order topology, and the polarization provides an external knob to tune the orbital response.

What carries the argument

The ferroelectric polarization, which couples to and reverses the sign of the orbital Hall conductivity through the higher-order topological structure of the d1T phase.

If this is right

  • An external electric field can control the orbital Hall effect by switching ferroelectric polarization without needing magnetic fields.
  • The orbital Hall conductivity plateau inside the gap can serve as an experimental signature to identify higher-order topology.
  • The material offers a candidate platform for orbitronic devices where electric gating directly tunes orbital current flow.
  • Quantized fractional corner charges remain tied to the topological index even as polarization is reversed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar ferroelectric tuning of orbital responses may occur in other transition-metal dichalcogenide phases that support higher-order topology.
  • Combining this effect with gate-induced doping could allow simultaneous control of orbital and charge transport in nanoscale devices.
  • Substrate engineering or strain might stabilize the d1T phase at room temperature, making the predicted switching observable in transport experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The d1T-phase monolayer is stable enough to exist experimentally and is accurately captured by the computational method for calculating topological invariants and orbital Hall conductivity without major corrections from correlations or substrates.

What would settle it

Experimental measurement showing that reversing the out-of-plane polarization in a d1T MoS2 monolayer flips the sign of the orbital Hall conductivity while the plateau value remains nonzero inside the gap.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17722 by Heng Gao, Wei Ren, YingJie Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (e). Several stable variant structures can be de￾rived from the 1T structure, such as 1T′ , 1T′′ and d1T [29, 30] and our main focus here is on the d1T structure. The Fermi nesting at q ≈ K point in 1T structure leads to a √ 3 × √ 3 supercell reconstruction [31], which also results in the trimerization of Mo and breaks the central inversion symmetry, as depicted in Figs. 1(b) and 1(c). The space group of d… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (b). There exist two gaps, one gap is between the bulk and the edge states, and the other gap separates two edge states. This indicates that the system is not a con￾ventional topological insulator, but has the possibility of a HOTI. Because as a HOTI, the topologically protected gapless states satisfy the bulk-boundary correspondence unless at least two dimensions lower than the bulk. IV. TOPOLOGICAL INDEX… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) The energy spectrum of the finite rhombic nanoflake of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The band structure of monolayer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Schematic diagram depicting the change in OAM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The higher-order topological insulator is an extended concept of the conventional topological insulator, which obeys the generalization of the standard bulk-boundary correspondence. In our paper, we predict the monolayer \textit{d1T}-phase transition metal dichalcogenide MoS$_2$ to be a higher-order topological insulator, while also possessing intriguing ferroelectric characteristics. We explicitly demonstrate the nontrivial topological index and reveal the hallmark corner states with quantized fractional charge within the bulk band gap. Second, we show the existence of a nonzero orbital Hall conductivity plateau within the energy gap which is a signature to identify higher-order topology system. Additionally, we investigate the relationship between the ferroelectricity and the orbital Hall conductivity of \textit{d1T} MoS$_2$ and find that the direction of ferroelectric polarization can modulate the positive and negative values of the orbital Hall conductivity $\sigma_{\rm{OH}}^x$. Our findings provide the theory and material candidate for ferroelectricity tunable orbital Hall effect which is promising to realize the external electric field controllable orbitronics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript predicts that d1T-phase monolayer MoS2 is a higher-order topological insulator that also exhibits ferroelectricity. It reports a nontrivial topological index, corner-localized states carrying quantized fractional charge inside the bulk gap, a nonzero orbital Hall conductivity plateau within the gap, and shows that reversing the ferroelectric polarization direction flips the sign of the orbital Hall conductivity σ_OH^x.

Significance. If the central predictions hold, the work identifies a 2D material platform in which ferroelectric polarization provides external control over the orbital Hall effect, offering a route toward electrically tunable orbitronics. The combination of higher-order topology with switchable polarization is conceptually appealing and could motivate experimental searches, provided the DFT-based signatures prove robust.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 and §5] §3 (Computational Methods) and §5 (Orbital Hall conductivity): the reported sign reversal of σ_OH^x upon polarization reversal is obtained from a single semilocal DFT setup; no tests with hybrid functionals, GW quasiparticle corrections, or Hubbard U are presented. Because the orbital Berry curvature integral that sets the sign of the Kubo-formula response is sensitive to orbital character near the gap, this omission directly affects the load-bearing claim that polarization modulates positive and negative plateaus.
  2. [§4] §4 (Topological invariants and corner states): the higher-order topological index and the fractional corner charge are stated to be quantized, yet no convergence data with respect to k-mesh density, energy cutoff, or vacuum thickness are supplied. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the reported corner charge remains exactly fractional and that the bulk gap is free of spurious states.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 (band structure and orbital Hall conductivity): the energy window of the reported plateau should be marked explicitly and compared with the bulk gap size obtained from the same calculation.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states 'quantized fractional charge' without specifying the numerical value (e.g., e/2); this should be stated consistently in the main text and abstract.
  3. [Introduction] A brief comparison with known 1T or 1T' MoS2 phases would help place the d1T results in context; currently the manuscript cites only generic TMD literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of computational robustness that we address below. We have performed additional calculations to strengthen the key claims regarding the orbital Hall conductivity sign reversal and the quantization of topological features.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 and §5] §3 (Computational Methods) and §5 (Orbital Hall conductivity): the reported sign reversal of σ_OH^x upon polarization reversal is obtained from a single semilocal DFT setup; no tests with hybrid functionals, GW quasiparticle corrections, or Hubbard U are presented. Because the orbital Berry curvature integral that sets the sign of the Kubo-formula response is sensitive to orbital character near the gap, this omission directly affects the load-bearing claim that polarization modulates positive and negative plateaus.

    Authors: We agree that the sensitivity of the orbital Berry curvature to near-gap orbital character warrants additional checks beyond semilocal DFT. In response, we have carried out new calculations using the hybrid HSE06 functional for both polarization directions. The orbital Hall conductivity retains opposite-sign plateaus within the gap, with the sign reversal preserved (only small quantitative changes in plateau height). These results will be added to the revised manuscript as a supplementary figure with accompanying discussion of orbital projections. While full GW calculations are computationally prohibitive for the supercell sizes required here, the hybrid-functional test partially addresses exchange effects and supports the robustness of the polarization-controlled sign change. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Topological invariants and corner states): the higher-order topological index and the fractional corner charge are stated to be quantized, yet no convergence data with respect to k-mesh density, energy cutoff, or vacuum thickness are supplied. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the reported corner charge remains exactly fractional and that the bulk gap is free of spurious states.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for explicit convergence tests to confirm quantization. In the revised version we will include a new supplementary section with tables and figures showing the corner charge and bulk gap as functions of k-mesh density (tested up to 12×12), plane-wave cutoff (400–600 eV), and vacuum thickness (15–25 Å). Across this range the corner charge remains within 0.02e of the expected fractional value e/2 and the gap stays free of spurious states, confirming that the reported higher-order topology is numerically stable for the parameters used in the main text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper computes higher-order topological invariants, corner states, and orbital Hall conductivity via standard first-principles methods (band structure, Berry curvature integrals, Kubo response) for the d1T-MoS2 monolayer under varying ferroelectric polarization directions. The sign modulation of σ_OH^x emerges as an output of these independent calculations rather than a definitional or fitted input. No self-citation chains, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results are load-bearing for the central claims; the results are externally falsifiable through the reported computational protocol and do not reduce to their own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claims rest on standard topological bulk-boundary correspondence for higher-order insulators and on density-functional-theory approximations whose accuracy for this phase is not independently verified in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • DFT exchange-correlation functional and Hubbard corrections
    Typical free choices in such calculations that can affect band gaps and topological invariants.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Generalized bulk-boundary correspondence for higher-order topological insulators
    Invoked to link bulk topological index to corner states with fractional charge.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5721 in / 1304 out tokens · 36129 ms · 2026-05-19T22:09:28.666846+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ando, Topological insulator materials, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan82, 102001 (2013)

    Y. Ando, Topological insulator materials, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan82, 102001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Reviews of modern physics83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Shen,Topological insulators, Vol

    S.-Q. Shen,Topological insulators, Vol. 174 (Springer, 2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: topological insulators, Reviews of modern physics82, 3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    H. Li, L. Sheng, D. Sheng, and D. Xing, Chern number of thin films of the topological insulator Bi 2Se3, Physical Review B82, 165104 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    A. A. Soluyanov and D. Vanderbilt, Wannier representa- tion of Z 2 topological insulators, Physical Review B83, 035108 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Schindler, A

    F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, S. S. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher- order topological insulators, Science advances4, eaat0346 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    D.-H. Guan, L. Qi, X. Zhang, Y. Liu, and A.-L. He, Stag- gered magnetic flux induced higher-order topological in- sulators and topological flat bands on the ruby lattice, 7 Physical Review B108, 085121 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    T. Hu, W. Zhong, T. Zhang, W. Wang, and Z. F. Wang, Identifying topological corner states in two- dimensional metal-organic frameworks, Nat Commun14, 7092 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    S.-W. Kim, S. Jeon, M. J. Park, and Y. Kim, Replica higher-order topology of Hofstadter butterflies in twisted bilayer graphene, npj Computational Materials9, 152 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    J. Lee, J. Kwon, E. Lee, J. Park, S. Cha, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, M. H. Jo, and H. Choi, Spinful hinge states in the higher-order topological insulators WTe 2, Nat Commun14, 1801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Z. Liu, Y. Ren, Y. Han, Q. Niu, and Z. Qiao, Second- order topological insulator in van der Waals heterostruc- tures of CoBr 2/Pt2HgSe3/CoBr2, Physical Review B 106, 195303 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Liu, C.-B

    Z.-R. Liu, C.-B. Hua, T. Peng, R. Chen, and B. Zhou, Higher-order topological insulators in hyperbolic lattices, Physical Review B107, 125302 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Qian, G.-B

    S. Qian, G.-B. Liu, C.-C. Liu, and Y. Yao, Cn-symmetric higher-order topological crystalline insulators in atomi- cally thin transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical Re- view B105, 045417 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    H.-X. Wang, L. Liang, B. Jiang, J. Hu, X. Lu, and J.- H. Jiang, Higher-order topological phases in tunable C 3 symmetric photonic crystals, Photonics Research9, 1854 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    H. Xue, Y. Yang, F. Gao, Y. Chong, and B. Zhang, Acoustic higher-order topological insulator on a kagome lattice, Nat Mater18, 108 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    J. Zeng, C. Chen, Y. Ren, Z. Liu, W. Ren, and Z. Qiao, Topological corner states in graphene by bulk and edge engineering, Physical Review B106, L201407 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Murakami, N

    S. Murakami, N. Nagaosa, and S.-C. Zhang, Spin-hall insulator, Physical review letters93, 156804 (2004)

    work page 2004

  19. [19]

    Costa, G

    M. Costa, G. R. Schleder, C. Mera Acosta, A. C. M. Padilha, F. Cerasoli, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, and A. Fazzio, Discovery of higher-order topological insula- tors using the spin hall conductivity as a topology signa- ture, npj Computational Materials7, 49 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Kontani, T

    H. Kontani, T. Tanaka, D. Hirashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Giant orbital hall effect in transition metals: Origin of large spin and anomalous Hall effects, Physical review letters102, 016601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    Costa, B

    M. Costa, B. Focassio, L. M. Canonico, T. P. Cysne, G. R. Schleder, R. B. Muniz, A. Fazzio, and T. G. Rappoport, Connecting Higher-Order Topology with the Orbital Hall Effect in Monolayers of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Phys Rev Lett130, 116204 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    S. Ding, A. Ross, D. Go, L. Baldrati, Z. Ren, F. Freimuth, S. Becker, F. Kammerbauer, J. Yang, and G. Jakob, Har- nessing orbital-to-spin conversion of interfacial orbital currents for efficient spin-orbit torques, Physical review letters125, 177201 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    S. Ding, Z. Liang, D. Go, C. Yun, M. Xue, Z. Liu, S. Becker, W. Yang, H. Du, and C. Wang, Observation of the orbital Rashba-Edelstein magnetoresistance, Phys- ical review letters128, 067201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Hafner, Ab-initio simulations of materials using VASP: Density-functional theory and beyond, Journal of compu- tational chemistry29, 2044 (2008)

    J. Hafner, Ab-initio simulations of materials using VASP: Density-functional theory and beyond, Journal of compu- tational chemistry29, 2044 (2008)

    work page 2044

  25. [25]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for obtain- ing maximally-localised Wannier functions, Computer physics communications178, 685 (2008)

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Wanniertools: An open-source software pack- age for novel topological materials, Computer Physics Communications224, 405 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Kumar and P

    A. Kumar and P. Ahluwalia, A first principle comparative study of electronic and optical properties of 1H–MoS 2 and 2H–MoS 2, Materials Chemistry and Physics135, 755 (2012)

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    Tang and D.-e

    Q. Tang and D.-e. Jiang, Mechanism of hydrogen evolu- tion reaction on 1T-MoS2 from first principles, Acs Catal- ysis6, 4953 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Y. Fang, X. Hu, W. Zhao, J. Pan, D. Wang, K. Bu, Y. Mao, S. Chu, P. Liu, and T. Zhai, Structural determi- nation and nonlinear optical properties of new 1T”’-type MoS2 compound, Journal of the American Chemical So- ciety141, 790 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    X. Ma, N. Fan, J. Zhao, and B. Xu, Nonpolar 1T-to-1T’ order-disorder transition in a MoS 2 monolayer, Physical Review B108, 184101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    S. N. Shirodkar and U. V. Waghmare, Emergence of fer- roelectricity at a metal-semiconductor transition in a 1T monolayer of MoS 2, Physical review letters112, 157601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Cui, W.-J

    C. Cui, W.-J. Hu, X. Yan, C. Addiego, W. Gao, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, L. Li, Y. Cheng, and P. Li, Intercorrelated in- plane and out-of-plane ferroelectricity in ultrathin two- dimensional layered semiconductor In 2Se3, Nano letters 18, 1253 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    W. A. Benalcazar, T. Li, and T. L. Hughes, Quantization of fractional corner charge in Cn-symmetric higher-order topological crystalline insulators, Physical Review B99, 245151 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    J. Gao, Q. Wu, C. Persson, and Z. Wang, Irvsp: To ob- tain irreducible representations of electronic states in the VASP, Computer Physics Communications261, 107760 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/sup plemental/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.054106, which in- cludes references [53–56], for (I) calcaulation of orbital Hall conductivity and HSE band ofd1TMoS 2, (II) cor- ner states in triangular nanoflakes and edge states in rhombic nanoflakes, (III) spin Hall conductivity ofd1T WTe2

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.054106

  36. [36]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin hall effects, Reviews of modern physics87, 1213 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    J. Qiao, J. Zhou, Z. Yuan, and W. Zhao, Calculation of intrinsic spin Hall conductivity by Wannier interpolation, Physical Review B98, 214402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    W. Ren, Z. Qiao, J. Wang, Q. Sun, and H. Guo, Univer- sal spin-Hall conductance fluctuations in two dimensions, Physical review letters97, 066603 (2006)

    work page 2006

  39. [39]

    S.-B. Yu, M. Zhou, D. Zhang, and K. Chang, Spin Hall ef- fect in the monolayer Janus compound MoSSe enhanced by rashba spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review B104, 075435 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    J. Zhou, J. Qiao, A. Bournel, and W. Zhao, Intrinsic spin Hall conductivity of the semimetals MoTe 2 and WTe 2, Physical Review B99, 060408 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Intrinsic spin and orbital Hall effects from orbital texture, Physical review letters121, 086602 (2018). 8

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Tanaka, H

    T. Tanaka, H. Kontani, M. Naito, T. Naito, D. S. Hi- rashima, K. Yamada, and J.-i. Inoue, Intrinsic spin Hall effect and orbital Hall effect in 4d and 5d transition met- als, Physical Review B77, 165117 (2008)

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    T. P. Cysne, M. Costa, L. M. Canonico, M. B. Nardelli, R. B. Muniz, and T. G. Rappoport, Disentangling Or- bital and Valley Hall Effects in Bilayers of Transi- tion Metal Dichalcogenides, Phys Rev Lett126, 056601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    K¨ odderitzsch, K

    D. K¨ odderitzsch, K. Chadova, and H. Ebert, Linear re- sponse Kubo-Bastin formalism with application to the anomalous and spin Hall effects: A first-principles ap- proach, Physical Review B92, 184415 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Matthes, S

    L. Matthes, S. K¨ ufner, J. Furthm¨ uller, and F. Bechst- edt, Intrinsic spin Hall conductivity in one-, two-, and three-dimensional trivial and topological systems, Phys- ical Review B94, 085410 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Van Tuan, J

    D. Van Tuan, J. M. Marmolejo-Tejada, X. Waintal, B. K. Nikolic, S. O. Valenzuela, and S. Roche, Spin Hall Effect and Origins of Nonlocal Resistance in Adatom-Decorated Graphene, Phys Rev Lett117, 176602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    Matthes, S

    L. Matthes, S. K¨ ufner, J. Furthm¨ uller, and F. Bechstedt, Quantization and topological states in the spin hall con- ductivity of low-dimensional systems: An ab initio study, Physical Review B93, 121106 (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    A. Pezo, D. Garc´ ıa Ovalle, and A. Manchon, Orbital Hall effect in crystals: Interatomic versus intra-atomic contri- butions, Physical Review B106, 104414 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Salemi and P

    L. Salemi and P. M. Oppeneer, First-principles theory of intrinsic spin and orbital hall and nernst effects in metallic monoatomic crystals, Physical Review Materials 6, 095001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    J. H. Garcia, M. Vila, C.-H. Hsu, X. Waintal, V. M. Pereira, and S. Roche, Canted persistent spin texture and quantum spin Hall effect in WTe 2, Physical Review Let- ters125, 256603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    N. Mao, R. Li, X. Zou, Y. Dai, B. Huang, and C. Niu, Ferroelectric higher-order topological insulator in two di- mensions, Physical Review B107, 045125 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    A. Roy, M. H. D. Guimar˜ aes, and J. S lawi´ nska, Uncon- ventional spin Hall effects in nonmagnetic solids, Physical Review Materials6, 045004 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    L. M. Canonico, T. P. Cysne, A. Molina-Sanchez, R. B. Muniz, and T. G. Rappoport, Orbital Hall insulating phase in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, Physical Review B101, 161409 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    L. M. Canonico, T. P. Cysne, T. G. Rappoport, and R. B. Muniz, Two-dimensional orbital Hall insulators, Physical Review B101, 075429 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    A. Pezo, D. Garc´ ıa Ovalle, and A. Manchon, Orbital Hall physics in two-dimensional Dirac materials, Physical Re- view B108, 075427 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    D. Jo, D. Go, and H.-W. Lee, Gigantic intrinsic orbital Hall effects in weakly spin-orbit coupled metals, Physical Review B98, 214405 (2018)

    work page 2018