pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17752 · v1 · pith:756DWIF6new · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Optical Neural Networks from Coherent Transient Dynamics in Waveguide QED

Jiande Cao , Yexiong Zeng , Franco Nori , Ze-Liang Xiang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 11:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords optical neural networkswaveguide QEDcoherent transient dynamicsRabi dynamicsnonlinear activationall-optical computingMNIST classification
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coherent transient dynamics in waveguide QED realize synaptic weights, temporal summation, and nonlinear activation for an all-optical neural network.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes an all-optical neural network architecture where photon-based computation replaces electro-optical conversions by using coherent transient quantum dynamics in waveguide QED. Phase-tunable nonlocal interference in a giant cavity sets the synaptic weights, a bad-cavity integrator sums sequential wavepackets through coherent combination, and transient Rabi dynamics of a driven two-level system supply the nonlinear activation. Full-physics simulations of this setup achieve high classification accuracy on MNIST and colored-object recognition tasks. The approach targets lower latency and energy use by keeping all operations in the optical domain.

Core claim

Within a waveguide QED framework, phase-tunable nonlocal interference implements programmable synaptic weights, a bad-cavity integrator performs temporal summation by coherently combining wavepackets, and transient Rabi dynamics of a driven two-level system provide nonlinear activation, enabling full-physics simulations to reach high accuracy on MNIST and colored-object tasks.

What carries the argument

Transient Rabi dynamics of a driven two-level system, which supply the nonlinear activation while the overall architecture uses waveguide QED for weights and summation.

If this is right

  • The optoelectronic activation bottleneck is eliminated because nonlinearity arises directly from light-matter transients.
  • Overall network latency decreases by avoiding conversion steps between optical and electronic domains.
  • Transient light-matter dynamics become a native physical resource for high-dimensional nonlinear processing.
  • The architecture opens a route to fully optical neuromorphic computing hardware.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the physical stability of the Rabi activation holds, the design could scale to larger networks on photonic chips with reduced power draw.
  • Integration with existing waveguide fabrication techniques might allow hybrid devices that combine this transient approach with linear optical computing elements.
  • Testing the repeatability of the activation function under varying drive strengths would directly probe the limits of the bad-cavity regime in real hardware.

Load-bearing premise

Transient Rabi dynamics of a driven two-level system can be engineered to deliver stable, repeatable nonlinear activation across the full dynamic range without being overwhelmed by decoherence or cavity losses in a scalable device.

What would settle it

A physical realization of the network in which measured classification accuracy on MNIST drops substantially below simulated levels once decoherence and losses are present in the transient Rabi activation stage.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17752 by Franco Nori, Jiande Cao, Yexiong Zeng, Ze-Liang Xiang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Physical implementation of a neuron in the WQED [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Nonlinear activation function. (a) Activation based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Architecture and classification performance of the quantum-optical neural network. (a) Representative training samples [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Optical neural networks promise ultrafast, low-energy information processing by performing computation directly with photons. Current implementations, however, are largely restricted to steady-state operation and rely on high-latency electro-optical conversion for nonlinear activation. To address these limitations, we propose an all-optical fully connected neural network architecture in which the basic neuronal functions are realized by coherent transient quantum dynamics. Within this framework, phase-tunable nonlocal interference in a giant cavity implements programmable synaptic weights; an integrator operating in the bad cavity regime performs temporal summation by coherently combining sequential wavepackets; and transient Rabi dynamics of a driven two-level system provide nonlinear activation. Full-physics simulations demonstrate high classification accuracy on MNIST and colored-object recognition tasks. These results eliminate the optoelectronic activation bottleneck, reduce latency, and establish transient light-matter dynamics as a native physical resource for high-dimensional nonlinear information processing, paving the way toward fully optical neuromorphic computing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an all-optical fully connected neural network in which synaptic weights are realized by phase-tunable nonlocal interference in a giant cavity, temporal summation is performed by coherent combination of sequential wave packets in the bad-cavity regime, and nonlinear activation is supplied by transient Rabi dynamics of a driven two-level system. Full-physics simulations are reported to achieve high classification accuracy on MNIST and colored-object recognition tasks.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work is significant because it demonstrates a physically motivated route to all-optical neuromorphic computation that eliminates the optoelectronic activation bottleneck. The use of coherent transient light-matter dynamics as a native resource for nonlinearity, combined with the reported simulation accuracies, provides a concrete alternative to steady-state optical approaches and could enable lower-latency, lower-energy high-dimensional processing.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5] §5 (Full-physics simulations): the reported MNIST and object-recognition accuracies rest on the assumption that transient Rabi trajectories remain stable under cumulative photon loss and dephasing across multiple layers. The manuscript does not provide explicit decoherence rates, cavity-loss parameters, or a robustness scan showing how accuracy degrades when these rates are set to realistic waveguide-QED values; without this, the link between the simulated nonlinearity and scalable physical performance is not secured.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (Temporal summation and activation): the bad-cavity integrator is stated to perform coherent summation, yet no quantitative bound is given on the fidelity loss incurred when wave packets propagate through successive layers before encountering the driven two-level system. If even modest dephasing alters the effective Rabi trajectory, the claimed nonlinear activation function collapses; this point is load-bearing for the multi-layer claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 1] The schematic in Figure 1 would benefit from an explicit label indicating the giant-cavity versus bad-cavity regions and the location of the driven two-level system.
  2. [§3.1] Notation for the Rabi frequency and detuning in the transient-dynamics section should be cross-referenced to the master-equation form used in the simulations to avoid ambiguity with steady-state conventions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made to strengthen the physical grounding of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§5] §5 (Full-physics simulations): the reported MNIST and object-recognition accuracies rest on the assumption that transient Rabi trajectories remain stable under cumulative photon loss and dephasing across multiple layers. The manuscript does not provide explicit decoherence rates, cavity-loss parameters, or a robustness scan showing how accuracy degrades when these rates are set to realistic waveguide-QED values; without this, the link between the simulated nonlinearity and scalable physical performance is not secured.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript lacked an explicit robustness analysis against realistic decoherence and loss. In the revised version we have added a dedicated paragraph in §5 specifying the cavity-loss rate (κ = 2π × 10 MHz) and dephasing rate (γ_φ = 0.05κ) used throughout the simulations. We have also inserted a new figure showing classification accuracy versus increasing dephasing strength up to five times the nominal value; accuracy on MNIST remains above 85 % and on the object-recognition task above 80 % within this range. These additions directly secure the connection between the reported nonlinearities and physically attainable waveguide-QED parameters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Temporal summation and activation): the bad-cavity integrator is stated to perform coherent summation, yet no quantitative bound is given on the fidelity loss incurred when wave packets propagate through successive layers before encountering the driven two-level system. If even modest dephasing alters the effective Rabi trajectory, the claimed nonlinear activation function collapses; this point is load-bearing for the multi-layer claim.

    Authors: The referee is correct that a quantitative fidelity bound is required to substantiate the multi-layer architecture. We have revised §3.2 to include both an analytical estimate of propagation-induced fidelity loss, F_loss ≈ (Δt / T_2)^2 for small Δt, and numerical results for networks with up to five layers. Under the coherence times employed, the effective activation function retains >92 % fidelity, preserving the claimed nonlinearity. These quantitative bounds are now stated explicitly and support the load-bearing multi-layer claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are forward simulations of a physically motivated model

full rationale

The paper proposes an all-optical neural network architecture whose components (phase-tunable weights via giant-cavity interference, temporal summation in the bad-cavity regime, and nonlinear activation via transient Rabi dynamics) are defined from standard waveguide-QED Hamiltonians and master equations. Full-physics simulations are then run on these equations to obtain classification accuracies on MNIST and colored-object tasks. No equation or result is shown to be equivalent to its inputs by construction, no parameters are fitted to the classification data and then re-labeled as predictions, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely via self-citation. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external physical models and benchmark datasets.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard assumptions of waveguide QED and cavity QED that are not derived in the abstract; no new free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the summary, though simulation accuracy implicitly depends on model parameters whose values are not stated here.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Coherent transient dynamics in the bad-cavity regime can be modeled by standard master equations without additional decoherence channels beyond those included in the simulation.
    Invoked when claiming that the integrator and Rabi dynamics function as described for temporal summation and nonlinear activation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5690 in / 1401 out tokens · 33108 ms · 2026-05-20T11:32:05.036420+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    LeCun, Y

    Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, Deep learning, Na- ture521, 436 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    D. R. Muir and S. Sheik, The road to commercial success for neuromorphic technologies, Nat. Commun.16, 3586 (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Kudithipudi, C

    D. Kudithipudi, C. Schuman, C. M. Vineyard, T. Pandit, C. Merkel, R. Kubendran, J. B. Aimone, G. Orchard, C. Mayr, R. Benosman, J. Hays, C. Young, C. Bartolozzi, A. Majumdar, S. G. Cardwell, M. Payvand, S. Buckley, S. Kulkarni, H. A. Gonzalez, G. Cauwenberghs, C. S. Thakur, A. Subramoney, and S. Furber, Neuromorphic computing at scale, Nature637, 801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Momeni, B

    A. Momeni, B. Rahmani, B. Scellier, L. G. Wright, P. L. McMahon, C. C. Wanjura, Y. Li, A. Skalli, N. G. Berloff, T. Onodera, I. Oguz, F. Morichetti, P. del Hougne, M. Le Gallo, A. Sebastian, A. Mirhoseini, C. Zhang, D. Markovic, D. Brunner, C. Moser, S. Gigan, F. Mar- quardt, A. Ozcan, J. Grollier, A. J. Liu, D. Psaltis, A. Alu, and R. Fleury, Training of...

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    L. G. Wright, T. Onodera, M. M. Stein, T. Wang, D. T. Schachter, Z. Hu, and P. L. McMahon, Deep physical neural networks trained with backpropagation, Nature 601, 549 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    J. L. Hennessy and D. A. Patterson, A new golden age for computer architecture, Commun. ACM62, 48 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams, Learning representations by back-propagating errors, Na- ture323, 533 (1986)

    work page 1986

  8. [8]

    Biamonte, P

    J. Biamonte, P. Wittek, N. Pancotti, P. Rebentrost, N. Wiebe, and S. Lloyd, Quantum machine learning, Na- ture549, 195 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Z. Wang, S. Joshi, S. E. Savel’ev, H. Jiang, R. Midya, P. Lin, M. Hu, N. Ge, J. P. Strachan, Z. Li, Q. Wu, M. Barnell, G.-L. Li, H. L. Xin, R. S. Williams, Q. Xia, and J. J. Yang, Memristors with diffusive dynamics as synaptic emulators for neuromorphic computing, Nat. Materials.16, 101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Z. Wang, S. Joshi, S. Savel’ev, W. Song, R. Midya, Y. Li, M. Rao, P. Yan, S. Asapu, Y. Zhuo, H. Jiang, P. Lin, C. Li, J. H. Yoon, N. K. Upadhyay, J. Zhang, M. Hu, J. P. Strachan, M. Barnell, Q. Wu, H. Wu, R. S. Williams, Q. Xia, and J. J. Yang, Fully memristive neural networks for pattern classification with unsupervised learning, Nat. Electron.1, 137 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Hoffmann, S

    A. Hoffmann, S. Ramanathan, J. Grollier, A. D. Kent, M. J. Rozenberg, I. K. Schuller, O. G. Shpyrko, R. C. Dynes, Y. Fainman, A. Frano, E. E. Fullerton, G. Galli, V. Lomakin, S. P. Ong, A. K. Petford-Long, J. A. Schuller, M. D. Stiles, Y. Takamura, and Y. Zhu, Quan- tum materials for energy-efficient neuromorphic com- puting: Opportunities and challenges,...

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Qiu, Y.-H

    E. Qiu, Y.-H. Zhang, M. D. Ventra, and I. K. Schuller, Reconfigurable cascaded thermal neuristors for neuro- morphic computing, Advanced Materials36, 2306818 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    I. K. Schuller, A. Frano, R. C. Dynes, A. Hoffmann, B. Noheda, C. Schuman, A. Sebastian, and J. Shen, Neu- romorphic computing: Challenges from quantum mate- rials to emergent connectivity, Appl. Phys. Lett.120, 140401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    T. Fu, J. Zhang, R. Sun, Y. Huang, W. Xu, S. Yang, Z. Zhu, and H. Chen, Optical neural networks: progress and challenges, Light Sci. Appl.13, 263 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Wang, S.-Y

    T. Wang, S.-Y. Ma, L. G. Wright, T. Onodera, B. C. Richard, and P. L. McMahon, An optical neural network using less than 1 photon per multiplication, Nat. Com- mun.13, 123 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Zhang, Y

    H. Zhang, Y. Song, S. Chen, Y. Bai, X. Xu, C. Huang, J. Wang, H. Chen, D. J. Moss, and K. Xu, Integrated platforms and techniques for photonic neural networks, 6 npj Nanophotonics2, 40 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Zhang and Z

    D. Zhang and Z. Tan, A review of optical neural net- works, Appl. Sci.12, 5338 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    B. J. Shastri, A. N. Tait, T. Ferreira de Lima, W. H. P. Pernice, H. Bhaskaran, C. D. Wright, and P. R. Pruc- nal, Photonics for artificial intelligence and neuromorphic computing, Nat. Photonics15, 102 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    P. L. McMahon, The physics of optical computing, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 717 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Zhang, M

    H. Zhang, M. Gu, X. D. Jiang, J. Thompson, H. Cai, S. Paesani, R. Santagati, A. Laing, Y. Zhang, M. H. Yung, Y. Z. Shi, F. K. Muhammad, G. Q. Lo, X. S. Luo, B. Dong, D. L. Kwong, L. C. Kwek, and A. Q. Liu, An optical neural chip for implementing complex-valued neural network, Nat. Commun.12, 457 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Z. Xue, T. Zhou, Z. Xu, S. Yu, Q. Dai, and L. Fang, Fully forward mode training for optical neural networks, Nature632, 280 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Bandyopadhyay, A

    S. Bandyopadhyay, A. Sludds, S. Krastanov, R. Hamerly, N. Harris, D. Bunandar, M. Streshinsky, M. Hochberg, and D. Englund, Single-chip photonic deep neural net- work with forward-only training, Nat. Photonics18, 1335 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Hamerly, L

    R. Hamerly, L. Bernstein, A. Sludds, M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, and D. Englund, Large-scale optical neural networks based on photoelectric multiplication, Phys. Rev. X9, 021032 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Y. Shen, N. C. Harris, S. Skirlo, M. Prabhu, T. Baehr- Jones, M. Hochberg, X. Sun, S. Zhao, H. Larochelle, D. Englund, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits, Nat. Photonics11, 441 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    K. Liao, T. Dai, Q. Yan, X. Hu, and Q. Gong, Integrated photonic neural networks: Opportunities and challenges, ACS Photonics10, 2001 (2023)

    work page 2001

  26. [26]

    Matuszewski, A

    M. Matuszewski, A. Prystupiuk, and A. Opala, Role of all-optical neural networks, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 014028 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    X. Lin, Y. Rivenson, N. T. Yardimei, M. Veli, Y. Luo, M. Jarrahi, and A. Ozcan, All-optical machine learning using diffractive deep neural networks, Science361, 1004 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Montes McNeil, Y

    A. Montes McNeil, Y. Li, A. Zhang, M. Moebius, and Y. Liu, Fundamentals and recent developments of free- space optical neural networks, J. Appl. Phys.136, 030701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Miscuglio, A

    M. Miscuglio, A. Mehrabian, Z. Hu, S. Azzam, I, J. George, A. Kildishev, V, M. Pelton, and V. J. Sorger, All-optical nonlinear activation function for photonic neural networks, Opt. Mater. Express8, 3851 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Hammerer, A

    K. Hammerer, A. S. Sørensen, and E. S. Polzik, Quantum interface between light and atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1041 (2010)

    work page 2010

  31. [31]

    Peyronel, O

    T. Peyronel, O. Firstenberg, Q.-Y. Liang, S. Hofferberth, A. V. Gorshkov, T. Pohl, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuletic, Quantum nonlinear optics with single photons enabled by strongly interacting atoms, Nature488, 57 (2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    K. Y. Bliokh, F. J. Rodr´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, F. Nori, and A. V. Zayats, Spin–orbit interactions of light, Nat. Photonics9, 796 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    K. Y. Bliokh, D. Smirnova, and F. Nori, Quantum spin hall effect of light, Science348, 1448 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    K. Y. Bliokh and F. Nori, Transverse spin of a surface polariton, Phys. Rev. A85, 061801(R) (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, V. Macr` ı, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Deterministic quantum nonlinear optics with sin- gle atoms and virtual photons, Phys. Rev. A95, 063849 (2017)

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    I. A. D. Williamson, T. W. Hughes, M. Minkov, B. Bartlett, S. Pai, and S. Fan, Reprogrammable electro- optic nonlinear activation functions for optical neural networks, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics26, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    H. Zhou, J. Dong, J. Cheng, W. Dong, C. Huang, Y. Shen, Q. Zhang, M. Gu, C. Qian, H. Chen, Z. Ruan, and X. Zhang, Photonic matrix multiplication lights up photonic accelerator and beyond, Light Sci. Appl.11, 30 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    J. R. Rausell Campo and D. Perez-Lopez, Reconfig- urable activation functions in integrated optical neural networks, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics28, 8300513 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    A. Ryou, J. Whitehead, M. Zhelyeznyakov, P. Anderson, C. Keskin, M. Bajcsy, and A. Majumdar, Free-space opti- cal neural network based on thermal atomic nonlinearity, Photon. Res.9, B128 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    D. Roy, C. M. Wilson, and O. Firstenberg, Colloquium: Strongly interacting photons in one-dimensional contin- uum, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 021001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeu- tel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nature541, 473 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    E. A. Chernykh, M. Y. Saygin, G. I. Struchalin, S. P. Kulik, and S. S. Straupe, Quantum optical neu- ral networks with programmable nonlinearities (2025), arXiv:2410.07868 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    G. R. Steinbrecher, J. P. Olson, D. Englund, and J. Car- olan, Quantum optical neural networks, npj Quantum Inf.5, 60 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Shen and S

    J.-T. Shen and S. Fan, Coherent single photon trans- port in a one-dimensional waveguide coupled with super- conducting quantum bits, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 213001 (2005)

    work page 2005

  45. [45]

    X. Gu, A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, Y.-x. Liu, and F. Nori, Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits, Phys. Rep.718, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraffe, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    J. M. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, and A. Blais, Supercon- ducting qubit with Purcell protection and tunable cou- pling, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 030502 (2011)

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    A. F. Kockum and F. Nori, Quantum Bits with Josephson Junctions, inFundamentals and Frontiers of the Joseph- son Effect, edited by F. Tafuri (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019) pp. 703–741

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    I.-C. Hoi, C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, T. Palomaki, B. Peropadre, and P. Delsing, Demonstration of a single- photon router in the microwave regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 073601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  50. [50]

    Vetsch, D

    E. Vetsch, D. Reitz, G. Sague, R. Schmidt, S. T. Dawkins, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Optical interface cre- ated by laser-cooled atoms trapped in the evanescent field surrounding an optical nanofiber, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 203603 (2010)

    work page 2010

  51. [51]

    Mitsch, C

    R. Mitsch, C. Sayrin, B. Albrecht, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Quantum state-controlled directional spontaneous emission of photons into a nanophotonic 7 waveguide, Nat. Commun.5, 5713 (2014)

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    Petersen, J

    J. Petersen, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Chiral nanophotonic waveguide interface based on spin-orbit in- teraction of light, Science346, 67 (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 347 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    A. F. Kockum, G. Johansson, and F. Nori, Decoherence- free interaction between giant atoms in waveguide quan- tum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 140404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Calajo, F

    G. Calajo, F. Ciccarello, D. Chang, and P. Rabl, Atom- field dressed states in slow-light waveguide qed, Phys. Rev. A93, 033833 (2016)

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    Wallraff, D

    A. Wallraff, D. I. Schuster, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, R.-S. Huang, J. Majer, S. Kumar, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Strong coupling of a single photon to a super- conducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature431, 162 (2004)

    work page 2004

  57. [57]

    Kannan, M

    B. Kannan, M. J. Ruckriegel, D. L. Campbell, A. Frisk Kockum, J. Braumuller, D. K. Kim, M. Kjaer- gaard, P. Krantz, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Vep- salainen, R. Winik, J. L. Yoder, F. Nori, T. P. Or- lando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Waveguide quantum electrodynamics with superconducting artificial giant atoms, Nature583, 775 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Andersson, B

    G. Andersson, B. Suri, L. Guo, T. Aref, and P. Delsing, Non-exponential decay of a giant artificial atom, Nat. Phys.15, 1123 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    X. Wang, T. Liu, A. F. Kockum, H.-R. Li, and F. Nori, Tunable chiral bound states with giant atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 043602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    J. Hu, D. Li, Y. Qie, Z. Yin, A. F. Kockum, F. Nori, and S. An, Engineering the environment of a super- conducting qubit with an artificial giant atom (2024), arXiv:2410.15377 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Carollo, D

    A. Carollo, D. Cilluffo, and F. Ciccarello, Mechanism of decoherence-free coupling between giant atoms, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043184 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    A. F. Kockum, P. Delsing, and G. Johansson, Designing frequency-dependent relaxation rates and Lamb shifts for a giant artificial atom, Phys. Rev. A90, 013837 (2014)

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    Y.-T. Chen, L. Du, L. Guo, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, and J.-H. Wu, Nonreciprocal and chiral single-photon scattering for giant atoms, Commun. Phys.5, 215 (2022)

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    Soro and A

    A. Soro and A. F. Kockum, Chiral quantum optics with giant atoms, Phys. Rev. A105, 023712 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    Y. Zuo, B. Li, Y. Zhao, Y. Jiang, Y.-C. Chen, P. Chen, G.-B. Jo, J. Liu, and S. Du, All-optical neural net- work with nonlinear activation functions, Optica6, 1132 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differen- tial equations and the master equation, Phys. Rev. A31, 3761 (1985)

    work page 1985

  67. [67]

    T. W. Hughes, M. Minkov, Y. Shi, and S. Fan, Training of photonic neural networks through in situ backpropa- gation and gradient measurement, Optica5, 864 (2018)

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    Sandberg, C

    M. Sandberg, C. M. Wilson, F. Persson, T. Bauch, G. Jo- hansson, V. Shumeiko, T. Duty, and P. Delsing, Tuning the field in a microwave resonator faster than the photon lifetime, Appl. Phys. Lett.92, 203501 (2008)

    work page 2008

  69. [69]

    Bergeal, R

    N. Bergeal, R. Vijay, V. E. Manucharyan, I. Siddiqi, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. M. Girvin, and M. H. Devoret, Analog in- formation processing at the quantum limit with a Joseph- son ring modulator, Nat. Phys.6, 296 (2010)

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    Bergeal, F

    N. Bergeal, F. Schackert, M. Metcalfe, R. Vijay, V. E. Manucharyan, L. Frunzio, D. E. Prober, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. M. Girvin, and M. H. Devoret, Phase-preserving am- plification near the quantum limit with a Josephson ring modulator, Nature465, 64 (2010)

    work page 2010

  71. [71]

    Ielmini and H

    D. Ielmini and H. S. P. Wong, In-memory computing with resistive switching devices, Nat. Electron.1, 333 (2018)

    work page 2018