pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17917 · v1 · pith:6E6CXXFNnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · physics.flu-dyn

Lateral hydrodynamics in supported membranes: The Evans-Sackmann model and its extensions

Yuto Hosaka , David Andelman , Shigeyuki Komura This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 01:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft physics.flu-dyn
keywords supported membranesEvans-Sackmann modelmembrane hydrodynamicsquasi-two-dimensional fluidsmembrane diffusionphase separationodd viscosity
0
0 comments X

The pith

The supported-membrane mobility tensor unifies treatments of diffusion, polymer dynamics, and phase separation in quasi-two-dimensional environments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review examines the Evans-Sackmann model for hydrodynamics in supported fluid membranes, where a thin lubricating layer between the membrane and substrate leads to a linear decay of momentum. The model provides a basis for calculating the drag on inclusions such as proteins or lipid domains and for describing the kinetics of phase separation. The resulting mobility tensor acts as a central object that organizes calculations of correlated particle motions and many-body interactions. Extensions of the framework to membranes with active components or chirality introduce an odd viscosity term that produces transverse hydrodynamic responses.

Core claim

The Evans-Sackmann model introduces a linear momentum decay term to capture the hydrodynamic coupling between a fluid membrane and a nearby substrate. Solving the resulting equations yields a mobility tensor that consistently describes lateral transport phenomena, including the drag experienced by disk-shaped inclusions and liquid domains as well as the coarsening dynamics during membrane phase separation.

What carries the argument

The linear momentum decay term that models the viscous interaction with the substrate through a thin lubricating fluid layer.

If this is right

  • Correlated diffusion of multiple inclusions follows directly from the off-diagonal elements of the mobility tensor.
  • Polymer chain dynamics on the membrane can be treated using the hydrodynamic interactions encoded in the tensor.
  • Phase separation kinetics are determined by the hydrodynamic drag on growing domains.
  • Many-body effects in quasi-two-dimensional systems become systematically accessible through the same tensor.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may extend naturally to other confined fluid systems, such as colloids between plates.
  • Odd viscosity in chiral membranes could be detected by observing flow patterns perpendicular to applied forces in experiments.
  • Active membrane models might reveal new instabilities not present in passive cases.

Load-bearing premise

Membrane-substrate coupling occurs through a thin lubricating fluid layer that produces a linear momentum decay term.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of the diffusion constant for a protein-sized inclusion in a supported bilayer at a known distance from the substrate that disagrees with the value calculated from the Evans-Sackmann mobility tensor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17917 by David Andelman, Shigeyuki Komura, Yuto Hosaka.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic representation of a supported lipid bilayer mem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic 3D representation of the Evans-Sackmann (ES) hydrodynamic model and its extensions (see also Fig. 1). (a) A circular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Log-log plot of the dimensionless drag coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Streamlines of the fluid velocity field in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) A polymer chain embedded in a supported membrane with the same geometry as in Fig. 2 (see Sec. IV B). (b) A passive inclusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Translational motion of a circular liquid domain with an odd viscosity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We review the theoretical development and modern applications of the Evans-Sackmann hydrodynamic model for lateral transport in supported fluid membranes. We first cover the original formulation, emphasizing the linear momentum decay term that captures membrane-substrate coupling mediated by a thin lubricating fluid layer. This coupling term enables quantitative interpretation of tracer diffusion measurements in supported bilayers. Building on this foundation, we survey theoretical extensions that relax standard boundary conditions at the inclusion perimeter, where inclusions refer to embedded objects such as proteins, lipid domains, or tracer particles within the membrane. We discuss the drag of a disk and a liquid domain, as well as the dynamics of membrane phase separation. We further highlight how the supported-membrane mobility tensor serves as a unifying tool for systematic treatments of correlated diffusion, polymer dynamics, phase separation kinetics, and many-body interactions in quasi-two-dimensional environments. Finally, we discuss recent extensions to active and chiral membranes, where odd viscosity provides a transverse hydrodynamic response and offers a possible route for detecting chirality in two-dimensional fluids.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews the Evans-Sackmann hydrodynamic model for lateral transport in supported fluid membranes. It covers the original formulation with its linear momentum decay term arising from membrane-substrate coupling via a thin lubricating layer, extensions that relax boundary conditions at the perimeters of inclusions (disks and liquid domains), the drag on such objects, phase separation dynamics, and the use of the supported-membrane mobility tensor to treat correlated diffusion, polymer dynamics, phase separation kinetics, and many-body interactions. The review concludes with extensions to active and chiral membranes in which odd viscosity supplies a transverse response that may enable experimental detection of chirality in two-dimensional fluids.

Significance. As a review that synthesizes established results rather than advancing new derivations, the paper provides a coherent overview that positions the mobility tensor as a unifying construct for quasi-two-dimensional membrane phenomena. This framing can help researchers connect disparate applications in membrane biophysics and soft matter. The discussion of odd viscosity offers a concrete, falsifiable suggestion for chirality detection that could guide future experiments. The manuscript accurately restates prior literature without introducing internal inconsistencies or parameter-fitting artifacts.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the phrase 'systematic treatments of correlated diffusion, polymer dynamics, phase separation kinetics, and many-body interactions' is repeated almost verbatim in the final paragraph; a single consolidated statement would improve readability.
  2. The description of the original Evans-Sackmann formulation would benefit from an explicit statement of the hydrodynamic boundary conditions at the substrate (e.g., no-slip or partial-slip) to make the linear decay term fully transparent to readers unfamiliar with the 1980s literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and constructive report, which accurately summarizes the scope of our review and highlights its potential utility for connecting disparate applications in membrane biophysics. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision and the recognition that the discussion of odd viscosity offers a falsifiable suggestion for chirality detection.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper restates prior literature with no new internal derivations

full rationale

This is a review article that surveys the established Evans-Sackmann hydrodynamic model and its extensions from the existing literature. The abstract and structure explicitly frame the content as a survey of prior formulations, extensions to inclusions, phase separation, and active/chiral membranes, without advancing new derivations, theorems, or predictions whose validity depends on parameters or assumptions defined inside this manuscript. All load-bearing technical steps trace to external citations rather than self-referential fits or redefinitions, so no circular reduction occurs within the paper's own chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper reviews an established model whose core assumptions originate in earlier literature; the ledger therefore records the key modeling premise highlighted in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Membrane-substrate coupling is mediated by a thin lubricating fluid layer that produces linear momentum decay
    This premise is presented as the central feature of the original Evans-Sackmann formulation in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5713 in / 1194 out tokens · 74676 ms · 2026-05-20T01:04:40.082786+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Advanced core-to-core network for the physics of self-organizing active matter

    The drag coefficient𝜁shows a logarithmic dependence on size when𝜅𝑎≪1, whereas it increases quadratically when𝜅𝑎≫1. (b) Semi-log plot of the dimensionless drag coefficient𝜁/(4𝜋𝜂 m)for a liquid domain as a function of the viscosity ratio𝐸. The liquid domain size is chosen as𝜅𝑎=1. of the diffusion coefficient, therefore, provides a powerful ex- perimental to...

    work page

  2. [2]

    S. J. Singer and G. L. Nicolson, The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes: Cell membranes are viewed as two-dimensional solutions of oriented globular proteins and lipids, Science175, 720 (1972)

    work page 1972

  3. [3]

    Alberts, A

    B. Alberts, A. Johnson, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and P. Walter,Mol. Biol. Cell(Garland Science, New York, 2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Edidin, Y

    M. Edidin, Y. Zagyansky, and T. Lardner, Measurement of mem- brane protein lateral diffusion in single cells, Science191, 466 (1976)

    work page 1976

  5. [5]

    Simons and E

    K. Simons and E. Ikonen, Functional rafts in cell membranes, Nature387, 569 (1997)

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 6 (Perg- amon Press, Oxford, 1987)

    work page 1987

  7. [7]

    Happel and H

    J. Happel and H. Brenner,Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynam- ics(Springer, Netherlands, 1983)

    work page 1983

  8. [8]

    Lipowsky and E

    R. Lipowsky and E. Sackmann,Structure and dynamics of mem- branes: I. from cells to vesicles/II. generic and specific interac- tions(Elsevier, 1995)

    work page 1995

  9. [9]

    P. G. Saffman and M. Delbr¨ uck, Brownian motion in biological membranes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.72, 3111 (1975). 12

    work page 1975

  10. [10]

    P. G. Saffman, Brownian motion in thin sheets of viscous fluid, J. Fluid Mech.73, 593 (1976)

    work page 1976

  11. [11]

    Hughes, B

    B. Hughes, B. Pailthorpe, and L. White, The translational and rotational drag on a cylinder moving in a membrane, J. Fluid Mech.110, 349 (1981)

    work page 1981

  12. [12]

    M. L. Henle and A. J. Levine, Hydrodynamics in curved mem- branes: The effect of geometry on particulate mobility, Phys. Rev. E81, 011905 (2010)

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    W. Shi, M. Moradi, and E. Nazockdast, The drag of a filament moving in a supported spherical bilayer, J. Fluid Mech.979, A6 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Oppenheimer and H

    N. Oppenheimer and H. Diamant, Correlated diffusion of mem- brane proteins and their effect on membrane viscosity, Biophys. J.96, 3041 (2009)

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    Sackmann, Supported membranes: Scientific and practical applications, Science271, 43 (1996)

    E. Sackmann, Supported membranes: Scientific and practical applications, Science271, 43 (1996)

    work page 1996

  16. [16]

    Tanaka and E

    M. Tanaka and E. Sackmann, Polymer-supported membranes as models of the cell surface, Nature437, 656 (2005)

    work page 2005

  17. [17]

    E. T. Castellana and P. S. Cremer, Solid supported lipid bilayers: From biophysical studies to sensor design, Surf. Sci. Rep.61, 429 (2006)

    work page 2006

  18. [18]

    Ainla, E

    A. Ainla, E. T. Jansson, N. Stepanyants, O. Orwar, and A. Je- sorka, Lab on a biomembrane: Rapid prototyping and manip- ulation of 2D fluidic lipid bilayer circuits, Sci. Rep.3, 2743 (2013)

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    Evans and E

    E. Evans and E. Sackmann, Translational and rotational drag coefficients for a disk moving in a liquid membrane associated with a rigid substrate, J. Fluid Mech.194, 553 (1988)

    work page 1988

  20. [20]

    Merkel, E

    R. Merkel, E. Sackmann, and E. Evans, Molecular friction and epitactic coupling between monolayers in supported bilayers, J. Phys. (Paris)50, 1535 (1989)

    work page 1989

  21. [21]

    Sackmann and M

    E. Sackmann and M. Tanaka, Supported membranes on soft polymer cushions: fabrication, characterization and applica- tions, Trends Biotechnol.18, 58 (2000)

    work page 2000

  22. [22]

    H. A. Stone and A. Ajdari, Hydrodynamics of particles embed- ded in a flat surfactant layer overlying a subphase of finite depth, J. Fluid Mech.369, 151 (1998)

    work page 1998

  23. [23]

    B. A. Camley and F. L. Brown, Diffusion of complex objects embedded in free and supported lipid bilayer membranes: role of shape anisotropy and leaflet structure, Soft Matter9, 4767 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    A. A. Anthony, O. Sahin, M. K. Yapici, D. Rogers, and A. R. Honerkamp-Smith, Systematic measurements of inter- leaflet friction in supported bilayers, Biophys. J.121, 2981 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Komura, S

    S. Komura, S. Ramachandran, and K. Seki, Lateral dynamics in polymer-supported membranes, Materials5, 1923 (2012)

    work page 1923

  26. [26]

    Komura, S

    S. Komura, S. Ramachandran, and K. Seki, Anomalous lateral diffusion in a viscous membrane surrounded by viscoelastic media, EPL97, 68007 (2012)

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Bar-Haim and H

    C. Bar-Haim and H. Diamant, Correlations in suspensions con- fined between viscoelastic surfaces: Noncontact microrheology, Phys. Rev. E96, 022607 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    H. C. Brinkman, A calculation of the viscous force exerted by a flowing fluid on a dense swarm of particles, Appl. Sci. Res. A 1, 27 (1949)

    work page 1949

  29. [29]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun,Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Vol. 55 (Dover Publications Inc, New York, 2000)

    work page 2000

  30. [30]

    Diamant, Hydrodynamic interaction in confined geometries, J

    H. Diamant, Hydrodynamic interaction in confined geometries, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.78, 041002 (2009)

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    Doi,Soft Matter Physics(Oxford University Press, New York, 2013)

    M. Doi,Soft Matter Physics(Oxford University Press, New York, 2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    K. Seki, S. Mogre, and S. Komura, Diffusion coefficients in leaflets of bilayer membranes, Phys. Rev. E89, 022713 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    R. J. Hill and C.-Y. Wang, Diffusion in phospholipid bilayer membranes: Dual-leaflet dynamics and the roles of tracer- leaflet and inter-leaflet coupling, Proc. R. Soc. A470, 20130843 (2014)

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Barentin, C

    C. Barentin, C. Ybert, J.-M. Di Meglio, and J.-F. Joanny, Surface shear viscosity of Gibbs and Langmuir monolayers, J. Fluid Mech.397, 331 (1999)

    work page 1999

  35. [35]

    G. J. Elfring, L. G. Leal, and T. M. Squires, Surface viscosity and Marangoni stresses at surfactant laden interfaces, J. Fluid Mech.792, 712 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Manikantan and T

    H. Manikantan and T. M. Squires, Surfactant dynamics: hidden variables controlling fluid flows, J. Fluid Mech.892, P1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Hosaka, S

    Y. Hosaka, S. Komura, and D. Andelman, Nonreciprocal re- sponse of a two-dimensional fluid with odd viscosity, Phys. Rev. E103, 042610 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Hosaka, D

    Y. Hosaka, D. Andelman, and S. Komura, Pair dynamics of active force dipoles in an odd-viscous fluid, Eur. Phys. J. E46, 18 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Hosaka, R

    Y. Hosaka, R. Golestanian, and A. Daddi-Moussa-Ider, Hydro- dynamics of an odd active surfer in a chiral fluid, New J. Phys. 25, 083046 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    R. Lier, C. Duclut, S. Bo, J. Armas, F. J¨ ulicher, and P. Sur´owka, Lift force in odd compressible fluids, Phys. Rev. E108, L023101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Daddi-Moussa-Ider, A

    A. Daddi-Moussa-Ider, A. Vilfan, and Y. Hosaka, Analytical solution for the hydrodynamic resistance of a disk in a com- pressible fluid layer with odd viscosity on a rigid substrate, J. Chem. Phys.162, 064103 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Daddi-Moussa-Ider, Y

    A. Daddi-Moussa-Ider, Y. Hosaka, E. Tjhung, and A. Vilfan, Hydrodynamic flow field and frictional resistance coefficient of a disk rotating steadily in a compressible fluid layer with odd viscosity on a rigid substrate, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.94, 044401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    K. Seki, S. Ramachandran, and S. Komura, Diffusion coefficient of an inclusion in a liquid membrane supported by a solvent of arbitrary thickness, Phys. Rev. E84, 021905 (2011)

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    Seki and S

    K. Seki and S. Komura, Brownian dynamics in a thin sheet with momentum decay, Phys. Rev. E47, 2377 (1993)

    work page 1993

  45. [45]

    S. L. Veatch and S. L. Keller, Seeing spots: Complex phase behavior in simple membranes, Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res.1746, 172 (2005)

    work page 2005

  46. [46]

    Komura, S

    S. Komura, S. Ramachandran, K. Seki, and M. Imai, Dynamics of heterogeneity in fluid membranes, inAdvances in Planar Lipid Bilayers and Liposomes, Vol. 16 (Elsevier, 2012) pp. 129– 164

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Komura and D

    S. Komura and D. Andelman, Physical aspects of heterogeneities in multi-component lipid membranes, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.208, 34 (2014)

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Lingwood and K

    D. Lingwood and K. Simons, Lipid rafts as a membrane- organizing principle, Science327, 46 (2010)

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    Ramachandran, S

    S. Ramachandran, S. Komura, M. Imai, and K. Seki, Drag coef- ficient of a liquid domain in a two-dimensional membrane, Eur. Phys. J. E31, 303 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Dietrich, L

    C. Dietrich, L. A. Bagatolli, Z. N. Volovyk, N. L. Thompson, M. Levi, K. Jacobson, and E. Gratton, Lipid rafts reconstituted in model membranes, Biophys. J.80, 1417 (2001)

    work page 2001

  51. [51]

    S. L. Veatch and S. L. Keller, Separation of liquid phases in giant vesicles of ternary mixtures of phospholipids and cholesterol, Biophys. J.85, 3074 (2003)

    work page 2003

  52. [52]

    Cicuta, S

    P. Cicuta, S. L. Keller, and S. L. Veatch, Diffusion of liquid domains in lipid bilayer membranes, J. Phys. Chem. B111, 3328 (2007)

    work page 2007

  53. [53]

    Or ¨add, P

    G. Or ¨add, P. W. Westerman, and G. Lindblom, Lateral diffusion 13 coefficients of separate lipid species in a ternary raft-forming bilayer: A Pfg-NMR multinuclear study, Biophys. J.89, 315 (2005)

    work page 2005

  54. [54]

    Baumgart, S

    T. Baumgart, S. T. Hess, and W. W. Webb, Imaging coexisting fluid domains in biomembrane models coupling curvature and line tension, Nature425, 821 (2003)

    work page 2003

  55. [55]

    Yanagisawa, M

    M. Yanagisawa, M. Imai, T. Masui, S. Komura, and T. Ohta, Growth dynamics of domains in ternary fluid vesicles, Biophys. J.92, 115 (2007)

    work page 2007

  56. [56]

    C. A. Stanich, A. R. Honerkamp-Smith, G. G. Putzel, C. S. Warth, A. K. Lamprecht, P. Mandal, E. Mann, T.-A. D. Hua, and S. L. Keller, Coarsening dynamics of domains in lipid mem- branes, Biophys. J.105, 444 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    A. J. Bray, Theory of phase-ordering kinetics, Adv. Phys.51, 481 (2002)

    work page 2002

  58. [58]

    Onuki,Phase Transition Dynamics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    A. Onuki,Phase Transition Dynamics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    work page 2002

  59. [59]

    Ramachandran, S

    S. Ramachandran, S. Komura, and G. Gompper, Effects of an embedding bulk fluid on phase separation dynamics in a thin liquid film, EPL89, 56001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    S. L. Veatch, O. Soubias, S. L. Keller, and K. Gawrisch, Critical fluctuations in domain-forming lipid mixtures, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.104, 17650 (2007)

    work page 2007

  61. [61]

    A. R. Honerkamp-Smith, P. Cicuta, M. D. Collins, S. L. Veatch, M. den Nijs, M. Schick, and S. L. Keller, Line tensions, corre- lation lengths, and critical exponents in lipid membranes near critical points, Biophys. J.95, 236 (2008)

    work page 2008

  62. [62]

    S. L. Veatch, P. Cicuta, P. Sengupta, A. Honerkamp-Smith, D. Holowka, and B. Baird, Critical fluctuations in plasma mem- brane vesicles, ACS Chem. Biol.3, 287 (2008)

    work page 2008

  63. [63]

    K. Seki, S. Komura, and M. Imai, Concentration fluctuations in binary fluid membranes, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter19, 072101 (2007)

    work page 2007

  64. [64]

    Ramachandran, S

    S. Ramachandran, S. Komura, K. Seki, and M. Imai, Hydrody- namic effects on concentration fluctuations in multicomponent membranes, Soft Matter7, 1524 (2011)

    work page 2011

  65. [65]

    Lauga,The Fluid Dynamics of Cell Motility, Vol

    E. Lauga,The Fluid Dynamics of Cell Motility, Vol. 62 (Cam- bridge University Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    Pozrikidis,Boundary Integral and Singularity Methods for Linearized Viscous Flow(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, England, 1992)

    C. Pozrikidis,Boundary Integral and Singularity Methods for Linearized Viscous Flow(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, England, 1992)

    work page 1992

  67. [67]

    Ramachandran, S

    S. Ramachandran, S. Komura, K. Seki, and G. Gompper, Dy- namics of a polymer chain confined in a membrane, Eur. Phys. J. E34, 46 (2011)

    work page 2011

  68. [68]

    Oppenheimer and H

    N. Oppenheimer and H. Diamant, Correlated dynamics of in- clusions in a supported membrane, Phys. Rev. E82, 041912 (2010)

    work page 2010

  69. [69]

    Komura and K

    S. Komura and K. Seki, Diffusion constant of a polymer chain in biomembranes, J. Phys. II France5, 5 (1995)

    work page 1995

  70. [70]

    A. S. Mikhailov and R. Kapral, Hydrodynamic collective effects of active protein machines in solution and lipid bilayers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.112, E3639 (2015)

    work page 2015

  71. [71]

    Hosaka, K

    Y. Hosaka, K. Yasuda, R. Okamoto, and S. Komura, Lateral diffusion induced by active proteins in a biomembrane, Phys. Rev. E95, 052407 (2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Manikantan, Tunable collective dynamics of active inclusions in viscous membranes, Phys

    H. Manikantan, Tunable collective dynamics of active inclusions in viscous membranes, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 268101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  73. [73]

    E. M. Purcell, Life at low Reynolds number, inPhysics and our world: reissue of the proceedings of a symposium in honor of Victor F Weisskopf(World Scientific, 2014) pp. 47–67

    work page 2014

  74. [74]

    Y. Ota, Y. Hosaka, K. Yasuda, and S. Komura, Three-disk mi- croswimmer in a supported fluid membrane, Phys. Rev. E97, 052612 (2018)

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    Hosaka and S

    Y. Hosaka and S. Komura, Nonequilibrium transport induced by biological nanomachines, Biophys. Rev. Lett.17, 51 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    Banerjee, A

    D. Banerjee, A. Souslov, A. G. Abanov, and V. Vitelli, Odd viscosity in chiral active fluids, Nat. Commun.8, 1573 (2017)

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    J. E. Avron, Odd viscosity, J. Stat. Phys.92, 543 (1998)

    work page 1998

  78. [78]

    Ganeshan and A

    S. Ganeshan and A. G. Abanov, Odd viscosity in two- dimensional incompressible fluids, Phys. Rev. Fluids2, 094101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    Hosaka, S

    Y. Hosaka, S. Komura, and D. Andelman, Hydrodynamic lift of a two-dimensional liquid domain with odd viscosity, Phys. Rev. E104, 064613 (2021)

    work page 2021

  80. [80]

    Masoud and H

    H. Masoud and H. A. Stone, The reciprocal theorem in fluid dynamics and transport phenomena, J. Fluid Mech.879, P1 (2019)

    work page 2019

Showing first 80 references.