pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18377 · v1 · pith:DSW32OURnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas

Dissipation-assisted preparation of Floquet-Laughlin states in superconducting circuits

Luis C. Steinfadt , Andr\'e Eckardt , Francesco Petiziol This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 11:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords fractional chern insulatorsfloquet engineeringdissipative quantum state preparationsuperconducting circuitsbosonic hubbard modelquantum hall effectanyonsopen quantum systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coupling to driven leaky cavity modes stabilizes the Floquet fractional Chern insulator state of photons in superconducting circuits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a protocol to prepare the gapped ground state of a Floquet version of the bosonic Harper-Hofstadter-Hubbard model using engineered dissipation rather than slow adiabatic ramps. The key is coupling the system to driven leaky cavities that act as a tunable bath with the target state as its fixed point. Numerical checks for two, three, and six particles confirm that the resulting steady states display bulk incompressibility, Hall response, and trapped fractional charges. A reader would care because adiabatic preparation becomes impractical once interactions and lattice frustration create long-range entanglement beyond the smallest sizes.

Core claim

For the bosonic Harper-Hofstadter-Hubbard model of few photons in superconducting circuits, protocols are designed for driven-dissipative stabilization of the Floquet fractional Chern insulator ground state at half filling. Dissipation is controlled by coupling to driven leaky cavity modes that create a tunable artificial environment whose approximate fixed point is the Floquet-FCI. Numerical simulations for two, three, and six particles demonstrate that the stabilized steady states exhibit fractional quantum Hall signatures including bulk incompressibility, Hall response, and trapping of fractional charges.

What carries the argument

Coupling to driven leaky cavity modes that realize a tunable artificial environment with the Floquet-FCI as its approximate fixed point.

If this is right

  • The scheme works for particle numbers where adiabatic preparation fails, such as three and six particles.
  • Bulk incompressibility appears in the steady-state density profile.
  • A nonzero Hall response is detectable in the stabilized states.
  • Fractional charges become trapped at defects or edges in the lattice.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method may extend to other open quantum systems where strong correlations hinder coherent control.
  • Similar cavity engineering could help stabilize states in different lattice geometries or interaction regimes.
  • Realistic circuit noise would need to be included in future simulations to assess experimental feasibility.

Load-bearing premise

The driven leaky cavity modes must be adjustable so that the open-system dynamics has the Floquet fractional Chern insulator as its approximate steady state.

What would settle it

Numerical or experimental observation that the six-particle steady state lacks a Hall response matching the expected fractional value would show the stabilization has failed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18377 by Andr\'e Eckardt, Francesco Petiziol, Luis C. Steinfadt.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Driven-dissipative stabilization of the ground state of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Change of the bulk charge, defined as the average [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Fractional Chern insulators (FCIs) are lattice analogs of fractional quantum Hall systems, where the interplay of strong interactions with a frustrated tunnelling kinetics leads to the emergence of a gapped ground state with long-range entanglement and anyonic excitations. The highly correlated nature of such systems makes their adiabatic preparation challenging already beyond the minimal system size of two particles. Considering Floquet implementations of the bosonic Harper-Hofstadter-Hubbard model of few photons in superconducting circuits, we design protocols for the driven-dissipative stabilization of its FCI ground state at half filling via quantum bath engineering. Dissipation control is achieved through the coupling to driven leaky cavity modes, which realize a tuneable artificial environment having the Floquet-FCI as its approximate fixed point. For systems of two, three and six particles, we show numerically how the flexibility of the control scheme further allows for the detection of fractional quantum Hall signatures in the stabilized steady states, including bulk incompressibility, Hall response and the trapping of fractional charges. Our results provide a concrete pathway to dissipation-assisted preparation of strongly correlated states in quantum simulators.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes driven-dissipative protocols to stabilize the Floquet fractional Chern insulator (FCI) ground state of the bosonic Harper-Hofstadter-Hubbard model in superconducting circuits. Dissipation is engineered by coupling to driven leaky cavity modes that realize a tunable artificial bath with the target Floquet-FCI as an approximate fixed point. Numerical simulations for two, three, and six particles are used to demonstrate that the resulting steady states exhibit fractional quantum Hall signatures, specifically bulk incompressibility, Hall response, and trapping of fractional charges.

Significance. If the central mapping from engineered dissipator to stabilized FCI observables holds, the work supplies a practical route to preparing strongly correlated topological states beyond the reach of adiabatic protocols in current quantum simulators. The flexibility of the cavity-based bath engineering and the explicit numerical diagnostics for small-N systems constitute concrete strengths that could guide experimental implementations in circuit QED.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical results for six particles] Numerical results for N=6: the reported signatures of bulk incompressibility, Hall response, and fractional charge trapping are presented without explicit comparison to steady states obtained under detuned drive parameters or in nearby non-topological regimes; such controls are needed to establish that the observed properties are diagnostic of the Floquet-FCI rather than finite-size or parameter-specific artifacts.
  2. [Dissipation control and steady-state analysis] The central claim that the driven leaky-cavity dissipator stabilizes a steady state whose observables match those of the target FCI requires a quantitative assessment of how sensitively the signatures depend on the artificial-bath parameters; without this, the identification of the stabilized state with the Floquet-FCI remains partially ambiguous for N=6.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Notation for the effective dissipator and the Floquet-FCI fixed-point condition could be introduced earlier and used consistently across figures and text.
  2. [Figure 4] Figure captions for the N=6 diagnostics should explicitly state the system size, boundary conditions, and interaction strength used in each panel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We appreciate the positive evaluation of the significance of our results on dissipation-assisted preparation of Floquet-Laughlin states. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional controls and analysis for the N=6 case.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical results for six particles] Numerical results for N=6: the reported signatures of bulk incompressibility, Hall response, and fractional charge trapping are presented without explicit comparison to steady states obtained under detuned drive parameters or in nearby non-topological regimes; such controls are needed to establish that the observed properties are diagnostic of the Floquet-FCI rather than finite-size or parameter-specific artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that explicit comparisons to control cases are valuable for confirming that the observed signatures are not artifacts. In the revised manuscript, we have added steady-state simulations for N=6 under detuned drive frequencies and in nearby non-topological parameter regimes. These controls show that the signatures of bulk incompressibility, Hall response, and fractional charge trapping are substantially suppressed or absent outside the target regime, thereby supporting their diagnostic value for the Floquet-FCI. The new results are presented in an extended section on numerical diagnostics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Dissipation control and steady-state analysis] The central claim that the driven leaky-cavity dissipator stabilizes a steady state whose observables match those of the target FCI requires a quantitative assessment of how sensitively the signatures depend on the artificial-bath parameters; without this, the identification of the stabilized state with the Floquet-FCI remains partially ambiguous for N=6.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for a quantitative sensitivity analysis. We have performed additional simulations for N=6 in which we systematically vary the key artificial-bath parameters (cavity detuning, drive amplitude, and coupling strength) around the values used in the main text. The revised manuscript now includes a quantitative assessment showing that the FCI signatures remain robust within a finite parameter window and degrade outside it. This analysis is summarized in a new figure and accompanying discussion, reducing the ambiguity in identifying the stabilized state with the target Floquet-FCI. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; proposal uses standard open-system engineering and direct numerical simulation of the master equation.

full rationale

The paper designs a driven-dissipative protocol by coupling the system to driven leaky cavity modes that are constructed to have the target Floquet-FCI as an approximate fixed point. For N=2,3,6 the authors then numerically integrate the resulting Lindblad equation and extract standard FQH diagnostics (incompressibility, Hall response, fractional charge trapping). These steps rely on established quantum optics techniques and direct computation rather than any fitted parameter being relabeled as a prediction, any self-citation chain that carries the central claim, or any ansatz smuggled in from prior work by the same authors. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The work rests on standard open quantum systems theory and numerical modeling of driven-dissipative dynamics; no major ad-hoc entities or fitted constants are highlighted in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • driving and dissipation parameters
    Tuneable amplitudes and rates for the leaky cavity modes are chosen to approximate the target fixed point.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Markovian master equation description of the open system
    Invoked for modeling the driven-dissipative stabilization.
invented entities (1)
  • tuneable artificial environment via driven leaky cavities no independent evidence
    purpose: To engineer the steady state as the Floquet-FCI
    Introduced as the control mechanism; no independent experimental evidence provided in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5732 in / 1269 out tokens · 27447 ms · 2026-05-20T11:23:29.930529+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    X.-G. Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    A. Yu. Kitaev, Annals of Physics303, 2 (2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    M. H. Freedman, A. Kitaev, M. J. Larsen, and Z. Wang, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.)40, 31 (2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1395 (1983)

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Read, Nuclear Physics B360, 362 (1991)

    work page 1991

  7. [7]

    Read and E

    N. Read and E. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B59, 8084 (1999)

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Das Sarma, M

    S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 166802 (2005)

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    S. A. Parameswaran, R. Roy, and S. L. Sondhi, Comptes Rendus. Physique14, 816 (2013)

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    E. J. Bergholtz and Z. Liu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B27, 1330017 (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, T. Menke, Dan Borgnia, P. M. Preiss, F. Grusdt, A. M. Kaufman, and M. Greiner, Nature546, 519 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    L´ eonard, S

    J. L´ eonard, S. Kim, J. Kwan, P. Segura, F. Grusdt, C. Repellin, N. Goldman, and M. Greiner, Nature619, 495 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    I. T. Rosen, S. Muschinske, C. N. Barrett, A. Chatter- jee, M. Hays, M. A. DeMarco, A. H. Karamlou, D. A. Rower, R. Das, D. K. Kim, B. M. Niedzielski, M. Schuldt, K. Serniak, M. E. Schwartz, J. L. Yoder, J. A. Grover, and W. D. Oliver, Nat. Phys.20, 1881 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Wang, F.-M

    C. Wang, F.-M. Liu, M.-C. Chen, H. Chen, X.-H. Zhao, C. Ying, Z.-X. Shang, J.-W. Wang, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Z. Peng, X. Zhu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Science384, 579 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Hafezi, A

    M. Hafezi, A. S. Sørensen, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. A76, 023613 (2007)

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    Eckardt, Rev

    A. Eckardt, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Advances in Physics64, 139 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    F. A. Palm, J. Kwan, B. Bakkali-Hassani, M. Greiner, U. Schollw¨ ock, N. Goldman, and F. Grusdt, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013198 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Blatz, J

    T. Blatz, J. Kwan, J. L´ eonard, and A. Bohrdt, Quantum 8, 1388 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    L.-N. Wu, X. Li, N. Goldman, and B. Wang, Phys. Rev. B111, 235111 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    M. Popp, B. Paredes, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A70, 053612 (2004)

    work page 2004

  22. [22]

    Y.-C. He, F. Grusdt, A. Kaufman, M. Greiner, and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. B96, 201103 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Motruk and F

    J. Motruk and F. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. B96, 165107 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Hudomal, N

    A. Hudomal, N. Regnault, and I. Vasi´ c, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053624 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Andrade, V

    B. Andrade, V. Kasper, M. Lewenstein, C. Weitenberg, and T. Graß, Phys. Rev. A103, 063325 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Diehl, A

    S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, and P. Zoller, Nature Phys4, 878 (2008)

    work page 2008

  27. [27]

    Kraus, H

    B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, S. Diehl, A. Kantian, A. Micheli, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A78, 042307 (2008)

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Nature Phys5, 633 (2009)

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    Carusotto, D

    I. Carusotto, D. Gerace, H. E. Tureci, S. De Liberato, C. Ciuti, and A. Imamoˇ glu, Physical Review Letters103, 033601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    Krauter, C

    H. Krauter, C. A. Muschik, K. Jensen, W. Wasilewski, J. M. Petersen, J. I. Cirac, and E. S. Polzik, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 080503 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    R. O. Umucalılar and I. Carusotto, Physical Review Let- ters108, 206809 (2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Biella, F

    A. Biella, F. Storme, J. Lebreuilly, D. Rossini, R. Fazio, I. Carusotto, and C. Ciuti, Physical Review A96, 023839 (2017). 5

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Z. Liu, E. J. Bergholtz, and J. C. Budich, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043119 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Carusotto, Comptes Rendus

    I. Carusotto, Comptes Rendus. Physique26, 533 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    K. W. Murch, U. Vool, D. Zhou, S. J. Weber, S. M. Girvin, and I. Siddiqi, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 183602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Hacohen-Gourgy, V

    S. Hacohen-Gourgy, V. V. Ramasesh, C. De Grandi, I. Siddiqi, and S. M. Girvin, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 240501 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Kapit, Quantum Science and Technology2, 033002 (2017)

    E. Kapit, Quantum Science and Technology2, 033002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Carusotto, A

    I. Carusotto, A. A. Houck, A. J. Koll´ ar, P. Roushan, D. I. Schuster, and J. Simon, Nat. Phys.16, 268 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Kapit, M

    E. Kapit, M. Hafezi, and S. H. Simon, Phys. Rev. X4, 031039 (2014)

    work page 2014

  40. [41]

    Lebreuilly, M

    J. Lebreuilly, M. Wouters, and I. Carusotto, Comptes Rendus Physique Polariton Physics / Physique Des Po- laritons,17, 836 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [42]

    Wang, Physical Review B94, 10.1103/phys- revb.94.195105 (2016)

    J. Lebreuilly, Physical Review A96, 10.1103/Phys- RevA.96.033828 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2017

  42. [43]

    R. O. Umucalılar and I. Carusotto, Physical Review A 96, 053808 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [44]

    Kurilovich, V

    P. Kurilovich, V. D. Kurilovich, J. Lebreuilly, and S. M. Girvin, SciPost Physics13, 107 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [45]

    Petiziol and A

    F. Petiziol and A. Eckardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 233601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [46]

    X. Mi, A. A. Michailidis, S. Shabani, K. C. Miao, P. V. Klimov, J. Lloyd, E. Rosenberg, R. Acharya, I. Aleiner, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, and further authors, Sci- ence383, 1332 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [47]

    Schnell, C

    A. Schnell, C. Weitenberg, and A. Eckardt, SciPost Phys. 17, 052 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [48]

    Ritter, D

    M. Ritter, D. M. Long, Q. Yue, A. Chandran, and A. J. Koll´ ar, Phys. Rev. X15, 031028 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [49]

    A. A. Clerk, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1155 (2010)

    work page 2010

  49. [50]

    Petiziol and A

    F. Petiziol and A. Eckardt, Phys. Rev. A110, L021701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [51]

    Weinberg and M

    P. Weinberg and M. Bukov, SciPost Physics7, 020 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [52]

    Lambert, E

    N. Lambert, E. Gigu` ere, P. Menczel, B. Li, P. Hopf, G. Su´ arez, M. Gali, J. Lishman, R. Gadhvi, R. Agarwal, A. Galicia, N. Shammah, P. Nation, J. R. Johansson, S. Ahmed, S. Cross, A. Pitchford, and F. Nori, Physics Reports QuTiP 5: The Quantum Toolbox in Python, 1153, 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  52. [53]

    Hauschild and F

    J. Hauschild and F. Pollmann, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [54]

    Catarina and B

    G. Catarina and B. Murta, Eur. Phys. J. B96, 111 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [55]

    See Supplementary Material, where tables reporting the parameters values used in the simultions producing all figures are reported

    work page

  55. [56]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [57]

    Streda, J

    P. Streda, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.15, L1299 (1982)

    work page 1982

  57. [58]

    Repellin, J

    C. Repellin, J. L´ eonard, and N. Goldman, Phys. Rev. A 102, 063316 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [59]

    Raˇ ci¯ unas, F

    M. Raˇ ci¯ unas, F. N.¨Unal, E. Anisimovas, and A. Eckardt, Phys. Rev. A98, 063621 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [60]

    B. Wang, X. Dong, and A. Eckardt, SciPost Physics12, 095 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [61]

    Wanckel and A

    L. Wanckel and A. Eckardt, Dissipative floquet engineer- ing of gapped many-body phases using thermal baths (2026), arXiv:2604.01291 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2026

  61. [62]

    Kalinowski, N

    M. Kalinowski, N. Maskara, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. X13, 031008 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [63]

    B.-Y. Sun, N. Goldman, M. Aidelsburger, and M. Bukov, PRX Quantum4, 020329 (2023)

    work page 2023

  63. [64]

    Petiziol, S

    F. Petiziol, S. Wimberger, A. Eckardt, and F. Mintert, Physical Review B109, 075126 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [65]

    Petiziol, Physical Review Letters133, 036601 (2024)

    F. Petiziol, Physical Review Letters133, 036601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [66]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2002)

    work page 2002

  66. [67]

    Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quan- tum Optics: Lectures Presented at the Universit´ e Li- bre de Bruxelles October 28 to November 4, 1991, edited by H

    H. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quan- tum Optics: Lectures Presented at the Universit´ e Li- bre de Bruxelles October 28 to November 4, 1991, edited by H. Araki, E. Br´ ezin, J. Ehlers, U. Frisch, K. Hepp, R. L. Jaffe, R. Kippenhahn, H. A. Wei- denm¨ uller, J. Wess, J. Zittartz, and W. Beiglb¨ ock, Lec- ture Notes in Physics Monographs, Vol. 18 ...

    work page 1991