Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 88 references

TEMPO: Temporal Enforcement via Mode-Separated Policy Optimization for Trustworthy LLM Backtesting

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-20 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read TEMPO trains LLMs to suppress post-cutoff leakage as a strict prerequisite before optimizing prediction accuracy in historical backtests.

desk verdict TEMPO uses a two-mode GRPO setup to gate leakage suppression before performance gains and claims a monotonic convergence proof, but the hard prerequisite may not hold cleanly in the optimizer. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.18843 v1 pith:JZJNA3FF submitted 2026-05-13 cs.LG

Zeyu Zhang , Bradly C. Stadie This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LG
keywords LLMbacktestingtemporalcomplianceleakagereductionmode-separatedrewardpolicyoptimizationhistoricalpredictiondiscipline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that LLMs routinely incorporate future knowledge when reasoning about past events, which inflates their measured performance and makes backtesting unreliable. Rather than trying to erase knowledge or rely on prompts, the authors introduce a training procedure that forces the model to select only pre-cutoff evidence for each specific instance. This is achieved by first driving leakage to zero through a dedicated reward mode, then allowing performance optimization only after compliance is met. If the method works as described, backtesting results would reflect genuine temporal reasoning instead of training-data contamination. A reader would care because trustworthy evaluation is required before LLMs can be used for forecasting or any decision that depends on what was known at a given time.

What carries the argument

The two-mode reward structure that treats leakage suppression as a non-negotiable first stage before any performance reward is applied.

What would settle it

A replication experiment on one of the three prediction tasks in which leakage after TEMPO training remains above 3.7% or task performance fails to improve or maintain in conditions that contain strong pre-cutoff signals.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

TEMPO introduces a two-mode reward structure in which a leakage mode drives all post-cutoff claims to zero as a hard prerequisite, after which a performance mode optimizes task accuracy, paired with a GRPO-based training pipeline that lets the model discover valid reasoning paths. The authors prove that this process monotonically decreases leakage, converges to the leak-free optimum, and improves task performance once temporal compliance is reached. Experiments on three prediction tasks and two models confirm leakage falls from 2-13% to 0.6-3.7% while performance rises 6-13% where strong pre-cutoff signals exist and holds steady where the task is difficult from valid information alone.

Load-bearing premise

The leakage mode can be implemented as a hard prerequisite that does not distort or interfere with subsequent performance optimization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Leakage rates drop from the observed 2-13% range to 0.6-3.7% across all tested conditions.
  • Task performance improves by 6-13% on predictions that have clear pre-cutoff signals.
  • Performance is preserved rather than degraded on tasks that remain difficult even with only pre-cutoff information.
  • Training exhibits monotonic leakage reduction and converges to the leak-free optimum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same prerequisite-mode structure could be applied to other instance-specific constraints, such as jurisdiction or regulatory regime, where certain facts are valid only under particular conditions.
  • Once leakage is reliably controlled, backtesting could be extended to longer historical horizons or to multi-step forecasting sequences without the current risk of contamination.
  • Models trained this way might generalize to real-time deployment where the cutoff date is the current moment, enabling safer use in live forecasting systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes TEMPO, a GRPO-based training method for LLMs that uses a two-mode reward structure (leakage mode as hard prerequisite before performance mode) to enforce temporal compliance and prevent post-cutoff knowledge leakage in backtesting tasks. It claims to prove that training monotonically decreases leakage and converges to the leak-free optimum, with empirical results across three prediction tasks and two models showing leakage reduced from 2-13% to 0.6-3.7% and task performance improved by 6-13% where strong pre-cutoff signals exist.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this addresses a practical and theoretically interesting problem in trustworthy LLM evaluation by learning instance-specific temporal discipline rather than relying on unlearning or prompts. The mode-separated reward and claimed monotonic convergence proof could generalize to other compliance settings. The empirical reductions in leakage with maintained or improved performance on multiple tasks provide a concrete demonstration of the approach.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The stated proof of monotonic leakage decrease and convergence to the leak-free optimum via the two-mode reward assumes strict mode separation with leakage mode as a hard prerequisite. However, the abstract provides no derivation or exact reward combination/mode-switching rule, leaving open whether GRPO scalarization allows performance gradients to influence the policy while leakage remains positive.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and §4 (implied experimental section): Performance gains of 6-13% are reported only in conditions where leakage compliance is first achieved. This raises the possibility that improvements are conditional on successful suppression rather than independently validated; external benchmarks independent of the leakage metric are not shown to confirm the gains are not artifacts of the reward gating.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Experiments] The description of how leakage is quantified (e.g., exact detection of post-cutoff claims) and the precise implementation of the two-mode reward function should be expanded for reproducibility.
  2. [Method] Notation for the reward modes and GRPO update rule could be clarified with an explicit equation showing the gating mechanism.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful comments, which help us clarify key aspects of the TEMPO method and its presentation. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The stated proof of monotonic leakage decrease and convergence to the leak-free optimum via the two-mode reward assumes strict mode separation with leakage mode as a hard prerequisite. However, the abstract provides no derivation or exact reward combination/mode-switching rule, leaving open whether GRPO scalarization allows performance gradients to influence the policy while leakage remains positive.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, constrained by length, omits the explicit reward formulation and mode-switching rule that underpin the proof. Section 3 of the manuscript defines the two-mode reward with leakage mode as a strict prerequisite (performance reward is gated at zero until leakage reaches zero for the instance), after which the policy transitions to performance mode; GRPO updates are applied sequentially to enforce this separation and prevent performance gradients from acting while leakage remains positive. The monotonic decrease and convergence follow from this gated structure. In revision we will add one sentence to the abstract summarizing the reward combination and hard-prerequisite rule to make the proof assumptions explicit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and §4 (implied experimental section): Performance gains of 6-13% are reported only in conditions where leakage compliance is first achieved. This raises the possibility that improvements are conditional on successful suppression rather than independently validated; external benchmarks independent of the leakage metric are not shown to confirm the gains are not artifacts of the reward gating.

    Authors: The sequential structure is intentional: leakage compliance is enforced first precisely so that subsequent performance gains reflect reasoning from pre-cutoff information alone. Task performance is measured by standard prediction accuracy on the three backtesting tasks, a metric computed independently of the leakage detector. Gains appear only where strong pre-cutoff signals exist because that is when valid temporal discipline yields measurable benefit; where signals are weak, performance is maintained rather than inflated. We will revise the experimental section to state explicitly that accuracy is evaluated separately from leakage scoring and to include a short analysis correlating gains with the presence of pre-cutoff evidence. No new external benchmarks are required for the core claim, but we can add a clarifying paragraph if the referee indicates a preferred reference task. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation chain is self-contained

full rationale

The paper defines a two-mode reward with leakage mode as hard prerequisite and claims a proof of monotonic leakage decrease plus convergence to leak-free optimum under GRPO. No equations or sections are quoted that reduce this proof to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or definitional tautology; the monotonicity claim is presented as following from the reward design and optimization pipeline rather than presupposing the target result. Empirical reductions in leakage (2-13% to 0.6-3.7%) and task gains are reported as measured outcomes on specific tasks and models, not as the proof itself. The central method therefore retains independent content from its stated assumptions and does not collapse by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the assumption that a leakage penalty can be cleanly separated from task performance without side effects and that GRPO can discover valid strategies once the hard constraint is met. No explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption A two-mode reward can enforce leakage to zero as a hard prerequisite before performance optimization without distorting the final policy.
    Invoked in the description of the training pipeline and the proof of monotonic decrease.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of TEMPO: Temporal Enforcement via Mode-Separated Policy Optimization for Trustworthy LLM Backtesting." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JZJNA3FF

@misc{pith2026260518843,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: TEMPO: Temporal Enforcement via Mode-Separated Policy Optimization for Trustworthy LLM Backtesting},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JZJNA3FF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.18843}
}
read the original abstract

Backtesting large language models on historical events requires reasoning exclusively from information available before a specified cutoff date. Yet models routinely leak post-cutoff knowledge from pre-training into their reasoning, inflating apparent accuracy and undermining evaluation validity. Prompt-based constraints fail when suppressed content is causally related to the prediction, and knowledge unlearning cannot address this problem because temporal compliance is instance-specific: the same fact may be legitimate evidence for one cutoff date and a violation for another. Rather than erasing knowledge, the model must learn temporal discipline: selecting evidence conditioned on each instance's cutoff date. We propose TEMPO (Temporal Enforcement via Mode-separated Policy Optimization), which trains this discipline via two contributions: (1) a two-mode reward where a leakage mode drives post-cutoff claims to zero as a hard prerequisite before a performance mode optimizes task performance; and (2) a GRPO-based training pipeline that enables the model to discover temporally valid reasoning strategies. We prove that training monotonically decreases leakage, converges to the leak-free optimum, and improves task performance once compliance is achieved. On three prediction tasks and two models, TEMPO reduces leakage from 2~13% to 0.6~3.7% across all conditions, with task performance improving 6~13% where strong pre-cutoff signals exist and maintained where the prediction task is inherently difficult from valid information alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18843 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of one TEMPO training step. For each training instance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Leakage–performance trade-off across tasks (columns) and models (rows). The ideal region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Instance-level OLR distribution on stock ranking (100 instances per condition). TEMPO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    [LEAKED]

    (2020-05-29) Marathon Petroleum’s stock price closed at $61.45 on 2020-05-29. [LEAKED]

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    [LEAKED] 28

    (2020-05-29) Targa Resources’ stock price closed at $25.10 on 2020-05-29. [LEAKED] 28

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    [LEAKED]

    (2020-05-29) Chevron Corporation’s stock price closed at $125.30 on 2020-05-29. [LEAKED]

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    [LEAKED]

    (2020-05-29) Halliburton’s stock price closed at $37.10 on 2020-05-29. [LEAKED]

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    [LEAKED]

    (2020-05-29) Occidental Petroleum’s stock price closed at $62.10 on 2020-05-29. [LEAKED]

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    (2019-10-31) Marathon Petroleum reported Q3 2019 revenue of $23.1 billion, up 12% year-over- year

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    (2019-11-07) Targa Resources reported Q3 2019 revenue of $1.8 billion, up 15% year-over-year

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    (2019-11-29) Marathon Petroleum’s stock price closed at $57.32 on 2019-11-29. [. . . 12 more items] Reasoning: Marathon Petroleum (MPC) showed strong revenue growth of 12% in Q3 2019 [1], and its stock price increased from $57.32 on 2019-11-29 to $61.45 on 2020-05-29 [16], indicating positive momentum. Targa Resources (TRGP) also had strong revenue growth...

    work page 2019

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    ] [LEAKED]

    (2025-11-01) Targa Resources’ Capital Expenditures fell 1894.31% to $671.8 million in Q3 2025 from the same period last year [. . . ] [LEAKED]

    2025

  2. [10]

    [LEAKED]

    (2020-01-21) Halliburton’s Completion and Production revenue was $3,506 million in 2019. [LEAKED]

    2020

  3. [11]

    [LEAKED]

    (2020-03-01) Marathon Petroleum’s Dividend Yield was 3.12% in 2018 and 3.52% in 2019. [LEAKED]

    2020

  4. [12]

    [LEAKED]

    (2019-12-31) In 2019, the average price of Brent crude oil was $64 per barrel. [LEAKED]

    2019

  5. [13]

    ] [LEAKED]

    (2025-11-01) Targa Resources’ Capital Expenditures (Quarter) stood at $183.5 million in 2021, then soared by 182.78% to $518.9 million [. . . ] [LEAKED]

    2025

  6. [14]

    expects 900,000 b/d from Permian by yearend 2023, up from 650,000 b/d by yearend 2022

    (2018-03-05) Chevron Corp. expects 900,000 b/d from Permian by yearend 2023, up from 650,000 b/d by yearend 2022

    2018

  7. [15]

    reported fourth-quarter 2018 earnings of $951 million, or $1.35 per diluted share

    (2019-02-07) Marathon Petroleum Corp. reported fourth-quarter 2018 earnings of $951 million, or $1.35 per diluted share. [. . . 5 more items] Reasoning: Chevron (CVX) is expected to have strong stock returns due to its significant production growth in the Permian basin, with e...

    2019

  8. [16]

    (2019-01-01) Chevron Corporation announced a 2019 organic capital and exploratory spending program of $20 billion

    2019

  9. [17]

    reported fourth-quarter 2018 earnings of $951 million

    (2019-01-31) Marathon Petroleum Corp. reported fourth-quarter 2018 earnings of $951 million

    2019

  10. [18]

    announced a 15 percent increase in the quarterly dividend on January 28, 2019

    (2019-01-28) Marathon Petroleum Corp. announced a 15 percent increase in the quarterly dividend on January 28, 2019

    2019

  11. [19]

    reported adjusted EBITDA of $4.1 billion for the fourth 29 quarter of 2018

    (2019-01-31) Marathon Petroleum Corp. reported adjusted EBITDA of $4.1 billion for the fourth 29 quarter of 2018

    2019

  12. [20]

    (2019-01-01) The EIA expects global oil markets to be tightest in the second and third quarters of 2019

    2019

  13. [21]

    (2019-01-01) The EIA expects diesel fuel margins to increase to an average of 53 cents/gal by the fourth quarter of 2019. [. . . 8 more items] Reasoning: Marathon Petroleum Corp. (MPC) showed strong financial performance in 2018, with $951 million in fourth-quarter earnings [2...

    2019

  14. [22]

    (2019-10-31) Marathon Petroleum reported Q3 2019 revenue of $25.8 billion, representing a 12% year-over-year increase

    2019

  15. [23]

    (2019-11-07) Targa Resources reported Q3 2019 revenue of $1.2 billion, representing a 5% year- over-year increase

    2019

  16. [24]

    (2019-11-01) Chevron Corporation reported Q3 2019 revenue of $32.5 billion, representing a 7% year-over-year increase

    2019

  17. [25]

    (2019-10-31) Halliburton reported Q3 2019 revenue of $5.1 billion, representing a 3% year-over-year decrease

    2019

  18. [26]

    (2019-11-04) Occidental Petroleum reported Q3 2019 revenue of $8.9 billion, representing a 10% year-over-year increase

    2019

  19. [27]

    (2019-04-01) Marathon Petroleum’s stock price increased by 15% in the first quarter of 2019

    2019

  20. [28]

    (2019-04-01) Targa Resources’ stock price increased by 8% in the first quarter of 2019

    2019

  21. [29]

    (2019-04-01) Chevron Corporation’s stock price increased by 10% in the first quarter of 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    (2019-04-01) Halliburton’s stock price decreased by 5% in the first quarter of 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    (2019-04-01) Occidental Petroleum’s stock price increased by 12% in the first quarter of 2019. Reasoning: Marathon Petroleum’s 12% year-over-year revenue growth [1] and 15% stock price increase in the first quarter of 2019 [6] indicate strong financial performance and investor...

    2019

  24. [32]

    its stock price increased from $57.32 on 2019-11-29 to $61.45 on 2020-05-29 [16], indicating positive momentum

    and a 5% stock price decrease [9], indicating weaker performance. Occidental Petroleum reported a 10% year-over-year revenue growth [5] and a 12% stock price increase [10], showing strong momentum. Predicted ranking:MPC > OXY > CVX > TRGP > HALTrue ranking:CVX > MPC > HAL > TR...

    2020

  25. [33]

    [LEAKED]

    (2021-08-10) Patty Mills was a key role player for the Brooklyn Nets during the 2020-2021 season, playing in 56 games and starting 10 of them. [LEAKED]

    2021

  26. [34]

    [LEAKED]

    (2022-07-06) In the 2020 NBA free agency, guards like Lonnie Walker IV signed a 4-year/$52 million deal with the San Antonio Spurs. [LEAKED]

    2022

  27. [35]

    (2021-05-17) Patty Mills averaged 8.5 points per game and 2.8 assists per game during the 2020-2021 NBA season

    2021

  28. [36]

    (2021-03-14) Patty Mills had a career-high 28.5 points per game in a single game on March 13, 2021, against the New York Knicks

    2021

  29. [37]

    (2019-07-07) In the 2020 NBA free agency, guards like D’Angelo Russell signed a 4-year/$117 million deal with the Brooklyn Nets

    2019

  30. [38]

    (2019-07-11) In the 2020 NBA free agency, guards like Tyus Jones signed a 3-year/$24 million deal with the Minnesota Timberwolves

    2019

  31. [39]

    Reasoning: Patty Mills had a solid 2020-2021 season, averaging 8.5 points and 2.8 assists per game while playing a key role for the Brooklyn Nets [1]

    (2019-07-07) In the 2020 NBA free agency, guards like D’Angelo Russell signed a 4-year/$117 million deal with the Brooklyn Nets. Reasoning: Patty Mills had a solid 2020-2021 season, averaging 8.5 points and 2.8 assists per game while playing a key role for the Brooklyn Nets [1...

    2019

  32. [40]

    [LEAKED]

    (2021-08-10) On 10 August 2021, Mills signed with the Brooklyn Nets. [LEAKED]

    2021

  33. [41]

    [LEAKED]

    (2022-07-10) On 10 July 2022, Mills re-signed with the Nets on a two-year, $14.5 million contract. [LEAKED]

    2022

  34. [42]

    [LEAKED]

    (2021-08-07) In 2021, Mills led the Australian Boomers to their first-ever Olympic medal at the Tokyo 2020 Olympics. [LEAKED]

    2021

  35. [43]

    [LEAKED]

    (2024-07-26) Mills represented Australia once again in the 2024 Paris Olympics. [LEAKED]

    2024

  36. [44]

    [LEAKED]

    (2024-07-01) Patty Mills’s basic salary for the 2024/25 NBA season is $6,802,950. [LEAKED]

    2024

  37. [45]

    [LEAKED]

    (2021-10-19) On 19 October, Mills made his Nets debut, scoring 21 points on 7-of-7 shooting from deep in a 127–104 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks. [LEAKED]

    2021

  38. [46]

    [LEAKED] [

    (2021-12-25) On the NBA Christmas game, Mills tied his career high with 34 points on 8-for-13 from three in a 122–115 win over the Los Angeles Lakers. [LEAKED] [. . . 15 more leaked items]

    2021

  39. [47]

    (2021-08-01) Patty Mills became a strong contributor off the bench and helped the Spurs win the 2014 NBA championship

    2021

  40. [48]

    (2021-08-01) The mid-level exception for 2021/22 was projected to be $9,536,000 for standard MLE. [. . . 6 more clean items] Reasoning: Patty Mills has established himself as a reliable and high-performing point guard, particularly known for his three-point shooting and clutch...

    2021

  41. [49]

    (2021-05-31) Patty Mills averaged 10.8 points, 1.7 rebounds, and 2.4 assists per game in 68 games during the 2020-21 season

    2021

  42. [50]

    (2021-05-31) Patty Mills shot 37.5% from the 3-point line during the 2020-21 season

    2021

  43. [51]

    (2020-11-10) The projected NBA salary cap for the 2021 season was $112,414,200

    2020

  44. [52]

    (2020-11-10) The mid-level exception for NBA teams with cap space started at $4.7 million in the 2020 offseason

    2020

  45. [53]

    (2020-11-10) The mid-level exception for NBA luxury tax teams started at $5.7 million

    2020

  46. [54]

    (2021-08-02) The non-taxpayer mid-level exception was approximately $9.3 million in 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    (2021-01-01) Patty Mills turns 33 years old in August 2021

    2021

  48. [56]

    (2014-06-16) Patty Mills won an NBA title with the San Antonio Spurs in 2014. [. . . 5 more items] Reasoning: Patty Mills is a veteran player with a career-high scoring average of 11.6 points per game [10] and a 37.5% 3-point shooting percentage [8]. He has also won an NBA tit...

    2014

  49. [57]

    [LEAKED]

    (2021-08-11) Patty Mills was 33 years old during the 2021 NBA free agency period. [LEAKED]

    2021

  50. [58]

    (2020-10-01) Patty Mills was a guard for the San Antonio Spurs in the 2020-2021 NBA season

    2020

  51. [59]

    (2021-05-31) Patty Mills averaged 8.3 points per game and 2.1 assists per game during the 2020-2021 NBA season

    2021

  52. [60]

    (2021-08-02) Patty Mills was a restricted free agent in the 2021 NBA free agency period

    2021

  53. [61]

    (2021-08-02) The NBA salary cap for the 2021-2022 season was set at $109.2 million

    2021

  54. [62]

    (2021-05-31) Patty Mills had a career average of 7.9 points per game and 2.0 assists per game over his NBA career

    2021

  55. [63]

    (2016-06-13) Patty Mills was a 2-time NBA champion with the San Antonio Spurs in 2014 and 2016

    2016

  56. [64]

    Patty Mills was a key role player for the Brooklyn Nets during the 2020-2021 season

    (2021-05-31) Patty Mills was a key backup guard for the San Antonio Spurs during the 2020-2021 season. [. . . 2 more items] Reasoning: Patty Mills was a guard for the San Antonio Spurs in the 2020-2021 NBA season [1]. He averaged 8.3 points per game and 2.1 assists per game [2...

    2021

  57. [65]

    Court of Appeals [

    (2018-10-01) Carol Ann Luther filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States on October 1, 2018, seeking review of a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals [. . . ] [LEAKED]

    2018

  58. [66]

    Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the decision of the U.S

    (2018-08-28) The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the decision of the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota on August 28, 2018, which denied Carol Ann Luther’s disability benefits. [LEAKED]

    2018

  59. [67]

    District Court for the District of Minnesota ruled on June 29, 2018, that Carol Ann Luther was not entitled to disability benefits

    (2018-06-29) The U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota ruled on June 29, 2018, that Carol Ann Luther was not entitled to disability benefits. [LEAKED]

    2018

  60. [68]

    (1935-08-14) The Social Security Act requires that an individual be unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity due to a medically determinable physical or mental impairment [. . . ]

    1935

  61. [69]

    Perales (1971), the Supreme Court held that the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare must provide a full and fair hearing to a claimant [

    (1971-05-03) In Richardson v. Perales (1971), the Supreme Court held that the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare must provide a full and fair hearing to a claimant [. . . ]

    1971

  62. [70]

    City of New York (1986), the Supreme Court held that the Secretary of Health and Human Services must apply the same standard of review [

    (1986-06-13) In Bowen v. City of New York (1986), the Supreme Court held that the Secretary of Health and Human Services must apply the same standard of review [. . . ] Reasoning: The evidence shows that Carol Ann Luther’s claim for disability benefits was denied by the U.S. D...

    1986

  63. [71]

    Securities and Exchange Commission, the Supreme Court held that SEC ALJs are subject to the Appointments Clause, as they exercise significant authority

    (2018-06-20) In Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Supreme Court held that SEC ALJs are subject to the Appointments Clause, as they exercise significant authority. [LEAKED]

    2018

  64. [72]

    Supreme Court granted certiorari in Virginia Uranium, Inc., et al

    (2018-05-21) The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Virginia Uranium, Inc., et al. v. Warren, John, et al. and Culbertson, Richard A. v. Berryhill [. . . ]

    2018

  65. [73]

    Berryhill, No

    (2018-04-01) In Luther v. Berryhill, No. 16-55987 (9th Cir. 2018), the Ninth Circuit reversed the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income for the claimant

    2018

  66. [74]

    Berryhill was appointed as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security under the Vacancies Reform Act, but her appointment was not confirmed by the Senate

    (2017-01-23) Nancy A. Berryhill was appointed as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security under the Vacancies Reform Act, but her appointment was not confirmed by the Senate. 34

    2017

  67. [75]

    Nancy Berryhill, Case No

    (2017-04-07) Lea Lynch v. Nancy Berryhill, Case No. 17-35308, was filed on April 7, 2017, and involved a Social Security disability claim against Berryhill. Reasoning: The evidence shows that Nancy A. Berryhill served as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security under the Vac...

    2017

  68. [76]

    (2018-01-01) The Decision Review Board (DRB) found that the grievant’s decision was “faulty” because it did not adequately evaluate the claimant’s condition

    2018

  69. [77]

    (2018-01-01) Article 5, Section 1 of the parties’ agreement acknowledges that ALJs are engaged in duties requiring consistent exercise of discretion, knowledge, and judgment

    2018

  70. [78]

    (2018-01-01) Article 5, Section 2 of the parties’ agreement provides that all judges shall be treated fair and equitably

    2018

  71. [79]

    (2018-01-01) The Arbitrator determined that the counseling memorandum issued to the grievant operated as discipline

    2018

  72. [80]

    (2018-01-01) The Arbitrator established a standard that counseling memoranda should only be issued when an ALJ’s actions are so egregious that they interfere with the rights of the claimant

    2018

  73. [81]

    (2018-01-01) The Agency argues that the award is contrary to law because the Arbitrator’s inter- pretation affects management’s right to direct employees. [. . . 7 more items] Reasoning: The key issue is whether the Agency violated the parties’ agreement by issuing a counselin...

    2018

  74. [82]

    disability

    (2018-01-01) The case involves a challenge to the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) interpre- tation of the term “disability” under the Social Security Act

    2018

  75. [83]

    (2018-01-01) The petitioner, Carol Ann Luther, argues that the SSA’s definition of disability is too narrow and does not properly account for her condition

    2018

  76. [84]

    (2018-01-01) The respondent, Nancy Berryhill, represents the SSA and defends the agency’s inter- pretation of the disability standard

    2018

  77. [85]

    (2018-01-01) The Social Security Act defines disability as the inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment

    2018

  78. [86]

    City of New York (1986), the Supreme Court held that the SSA’s interpre- tation of the Social Security Act is entitled to deference

    (1986-06-13) In Bowen v. City of New York (1986), the Supreme Court held that the SSA’s interpre- tation of the Social Security Act is entitled to deference

    1986

  79. [87]

    Thomas (2003), the Supreme Court reaffirmed the Chevron deference applicable to agency interpretations of the Social Security Act

    (2003-11-12) In Barnhart v. Thomas (2003), the Supreme Court reaffirmed the Chevron deference applicable to agency interpretations of the Social Security Act

    2003

  80. [88]

    disability

    (2010-06-21) In Astrue v. Ratliff (2010), the Supreme Court held that the SSA’s interpretation of the 35 term “disability” is entitled to deference. Reasoning: The petitioner argues that the SSA’s definition of disability is too narrow [2], while the respondent defends the age...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed May 20, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.