pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19002 · v1 · pith:CFH2DWTXnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ✦ hep-th

Uniqueness of D=8 minimal supergravity with two vector multiplets

Guillaume Bossard , Bingxin Lao , Ruben Minasian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 08:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords minimal supergravityeight dimensionsanomaly cancellationduality symmetryBPS sectorvector multipletsthree-form fluxBianchi identity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Consistency conditions isolate a unique minimal supergravity theory with two vector multiplets in eight dimensions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the protected couplings of minimal supergravity coupled to two vector multiplets in eight dimensions. It assumes the theory possesses a particular modular duality symmetry and demonstrates that anomaly cancellation, consistency with higher-dimensional origins, and the locations of gauge enhancement points together restrict the possible interactions to a single viable form in the BPS sector. A key outcome is that the Bianchi identity for the three-form flux receives no gravitational corrections. A sympathetic reader would care because this approach helps pin down why only a handful of string theory constructions yield minimal supersymmetry in eight dimensions.

Core claim

We show that consistency with anomaly cancellation, higher-dimensional uplifts, and gauge enhancement loci strongly constrains the allowed couplings and isolates a unique consistent theory in the BPS sector. In particular, we find that the Bianchi identity for the three-form flux cannot have gravitational contributions.

What carries the argument

The assumed modular duality symmetry of the form Γ₀(N)×Γ₀(N) inside SL(2,Z)×SL(2,Z), which enforces invariance constraints on the allowed couplings.

If this is right

  • The couplings of the theory are fixed uniquely within the BPS sector.
  • The Bianchi identity for the three-form flux excludes gravitational contributions.
  • The theory must admit consistent lifts to higher-dimensional string theories.
  • Gauge enhancement loci must be compatible with the assumed duality symmetry.
  • This isolates one of the four known eight-dimensional string theories with minimal supersymmetry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar consistency arguments might determine the allowed numbers of vector multiplets in related supergravity theories.
  • The absence of gravitational terms could simplify the study of flux compactifications and their moduli spaces.
  • Protected BPS quantities in this theory may be computed more directly once the couplings are fixed.

Load-bearing premise

The effective theory is assumed to possess a specific modular duality symmetry of the form two copies of Γ₀(N) inside SL(2,Z) times SL(2,Z) for some positive integer N.

What would settle it

Discovery of a consistent set of couplings that includes gravitational terms in the three-form Bianchi identity while still satisfying anomaly cancellation and higher-dimensional uplift conditions.

read the original abstract

There exist only four known string theories with minimal supersymmetry in eight dimensions, whose low energy effective descriptions are given by minimal supergravity coupled to $l=18$, $10$, or $2$ vector multiplets. It has been argued that these numbers are uniquely fixed by consistency conditions of the effective theory. In this work, we investigate the protected couplings of minimal supergravity coupled to two vector multiplets under the assumption that the theory admits a duality symmetry of the form $\Gamma_0(N)\times \Gamma_0(N)\subset {\rm SL}(2,\mathbb{Z}) \times {\rm SL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ for some positive integer $N$. We show that consistency with anomaly cancellation, higher-dimensional uplifts, and gauge enhancement loci strongly constrains the allowed couplings and isolates a unique consistent theory in the BPS sector. In particular, we find that the Bianchi identity for the three-form flux cannot have gravitational contributions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that, under the assumption of a duality symmetry of the form Γ₀(N)×Γ₀(N) ⊂ SL(2,ℤ)×SL(2,ℤ) for some positive integer N, the protected couplings of D=8 minimal supergravity coupled to two vector multiplets are uniquely fixed by consistency with anomaly cancellation, higher-dimensional uplifts, and gauge enhancement loci. This isolates a unique consistent theory in the BPS sector, with the specific result that the Bianchi identity for the three-form flux cannot have gravitational contributions.

Significance. If the derivation holds, the work would strengthen the case that consistency conditions in the effective theory select the known string realizations with l=2 vector multiplets in 8D minimal supersymmetry. The no-gravitational-contribution result for the Bianchi identity is a falsifiable statement that aligns with expectations from string embeddings and could guide further checks. The significance is tempered by the fact that the duality assumption is imposed rather than derived, so the uniqueness applies only within that restricted class of theories.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and the section introducing the duality assumption] The uniqueness result is load-bearing on the assumption of the specific duality symmetry Γ₀(N)×Γ₀(N) (stated in the abstract and used to restrict couplings before applying anomaly cancellation and uplifts). The manuscript does not derive this modular group from the consistency conditions or from an explicit string embedding; if a weaker or different duality holds, additional couplings may remain allowed and the uniqueness claim does not follow.
  2. [The section deriving the Bianchi identity] The claim that the Bianchi identity for the three-form flux has no gravitational contributions (abstract) follows from the constrained couplings under the duality assumption. An explicit step-by-step derivation showing how anomaly cancellation and uplift conditions enforce this without post-hoc parameter choices would strengthen the result, as the current outline leaves open whether all steps are free of additional inputs.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction and notation section] Clarify the notation for the modular forms and the integer N early on, and ensure all protected couplings are defined before they are constrained.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We agree that the duality assumption is central and that the derivation of the Bianchi identity can be presented more explicitly. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to clarify the conditional nature of the results and to expand the relevant derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and the section introducing the duality assumption] The uniqueness result is load-bearing on the assumption of the specific duality symmetry Γ₀(N)×Γ₀(N) (stated in the abstract and used to restrict couplings before applying anomaly cancellation and uplifts). The manuscript does not derive this modular group from the consistency conditions or from an explicit string embedding; if a weaker or different duality holds, additional couplings may remain allowed and the uniqueness claim does not follow.

    Authors: We agree that the duality symmetry of the form Γ₀(N)×Γ₀(N) is imposed as an assumption rather than derived from the consistency conditions within this work. The manuscript investigates the protected couplings of minimal supergravity with two vector multiplets under this assumption, motivated by the modular symmetries observed in known string embeddings with l=2. The uniqueness result is explicitly conditional on this symmetry class, as stated in the abstract and introduction. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract and the section introducing the duality assumption to more prominently emphasize that the uniqueness holds only within theories admitting this specific modular symmetry, and that relaxing or altering the duality could permit additional couplings. We do not claim a derivation of the modular group from first principles in the present analysis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [The section deriving the Bianchi identity] The claim that the Bianchi identity for the three-form flux has no gravitational contributions (abstract) follows from the constrained couplings under the duality assumption. An explicit step-by-step derivation showing how anomaly cancellation and uplift conditions enforce this without post-hoc parameter choices would strengthen the result, as the current outline leaves open whether all steps are free of additional inputs.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion to improve clarity. The no-gravitational-contribution result for the Bianchi identity is obtained by applying anomaly cancellation and higher-dimensional uplift conditions to the couplings already restricted by the duality symmetry. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the relevant section with a fully explicit step-by-step derivation. This will include the precise expressions for the constrained couplings, the anomaly cancellation equations applied to them, the uplift matching conditions, and the direct substitution showing that gravitational terms are forced to vanish, with no additional free parameters introduced beyond the initial duality assumption and consistency requirements. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; uniqueness derived under explicit external assumption

full rationale

The paper explicitly states the Γ₀(N)×Γ₀(N) duality symmetry as an assumption in the abstract and uses it to restrict protected couplings before applying independent consistency conditions (anomaly cancellation, higher-dimensional uplifts, gauge enhancement loci). The central result isolating a unique BPS theory and the claim that the three-form Bianchi identity has no gravitational contributions follow from these external conditions rather than being presupposed or fitted by construction. No self-definitional equations, predictions that reduce to fitted inputs, or load-bearing self-citations are present in the provided derivation outline. The analysis remains self-contained against standard consistency benchmarks once the assumption is granted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result rests on supersymmetry, anomaly cancellation, and the existence of higher-dimensional uplifts as background assumptions; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract, though N in the duality group is an unspecified positive integer.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The theory admits a duality symmetry of the form Γ₀(N)×Γ₀(N) ⊂ SL(2,ℤ)×SL(2,ℤ) for some positive integer N.
    This symmetry is assumed at the outset to constrain the protected couplings.
  • domain assumption Anomaly cancellation must hold.
    Invoked as a consistency condition that limits allowed couplings.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5691 in / 1436 out tokens · 31252 ms · 2026-05-20T08:37:04.601536+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 47 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Supergravity Theory in 11 Dimensions,

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, and J. Scherk, “Supergravity Theory in 11 Dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B 76(1978) 409–412

    work page 1978

  2. [2]

    The SO(8) Supergravity,

    E. Cremmer and B. Julia, “The SO(8) Supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B159(1979) 141–212

    work page 1979

  3. [3]

    The Complete N=2, D=10 Supergravity,

    P. S. Howe and P. C. West, “The Complete N=2, D=10 Supergravity,” Nucl. Phys. B238 (1984) 181–220

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Eleven Dimensional Origin of String/String Duality: A One Loop Test

    M. J. Duff, J. T. Liu, and R. Minasian, “Eleven-dimensional origin of string-string duality: A One loop test,” Nucl. Phys. B452(1995) 261–282,arXiv:hep-th/9506126

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  5. [5]

    Five-Brane Effective Action In M-Theory

    E. Witten, “Five-brane effective action in M theory,” J. Geom. Phys.22(1997) 103–133, arXiv:hep-th/9610234

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  6. [6]

    Supersymmetrical String Theories,

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “Supersymmetrical String Theories,” Phys. Lett.B109 (1982) 444–448

    work page 1982

  7. [7]

    Effects of D-instantons

    M. B. Green and M. Gutperle, “Effects of D-instantons,” Nucl. Phys.B498(1997) 195–227, arXiv:hep-th/9701093

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  8. [8]

    D-instantons, Strings and M-theory

    M. B. Green and P. Vanhove, “D-instantons, strings and M-theory,” Phys. Lett.B408 (1997) 122–134,arXiv:hep-th/9704145

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  9. [9]

    Construction of $R^4$ Terms in N=2 D=8 Superspace

    N. Berkovits, “Construction ofR 4 terms inN= 2D= 8 superspace,” Nucl. Phys. B514 (1998) 191–203,arXiv:hep-th/9709116

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    A note on non-perturbative R^4 couplings

    B. Pioline, “A note on non-perturbativeR 4 couplings,” Phys. Lett.B431(1998) 73–76, arXiv:hep-th/9804023. – 54 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  11. [11]

    Supersymmetry Constraints on Type IIB Supergravity

    M. B. Green and S. Sethi, “Supersymmetry constraints on type IIB supergravity,” Phys. Rev.D59(1999) 046006,arXiv:hep-th/9808061

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  12. [12]

    Eisenstein Series and String Thresholds

    N. A. Obers and B. Pioline, “Eisenstein series and string thresholds,” Commun. Math. Phys. 209(2000) 275–324,arXiv:hep-th/9903113

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  13. [13]

    The low energy expansion of the one-loop type II superstring amplitude

    M. B. Green and P. Vanhove, “The low energy expansion of the one-loop type II superstring amplitude,” Phys. Rev.D61(2000) 104011,arXiv:hep-th/9910056

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  14. [14]

    Minimal representations, spherical vectors, and exceptional theta series I

    D. Kazhdan, B. Pioline, and A. Waldron, “Minimal representations, spherical vectors, and exceptional theta series. I,” Commun. Math. Phys.226(2002) 1–40,hep-th/0107222

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  15. [15]

    Recursion Relations from Space-time Supersymmetry

    A. Basu and S. Sethi, “Recursion Relations from Space-time Supersymmetry,” JHEP09 (2008) 081,arXiv:0808.1250 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    Duality and higher derivative terms in M theory

    M. B. Green and P. Vanhove, “Duality and higher derivative terms in M theory,” JHEP 0601(2006) 093,arXiv:hep-th/0510027 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  17. [17]

    $R^4$ couplings and automorphic unipotent representations

    B. Pioline, “R 4 couplings and automorphic unipotent representations,” JHEP03(2010) 116, arXiv:1001.3647 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  18. [18]

    Small representations, string instantons, and Fourier modes of Eisenstein series (with an appendix by D. Ciubotaru and P. Trapa)

    M. B. Green, S. D. Miller, and P. Vanhove, “Small representations, string instantons, and Fourier modes of Eisenstein series,” J. Number Theor.146(2015) 187–309, arXiv:1111.2983 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    Minimal unitary representations from supersymmetry

    G. Bossard and V. Verschinin, “Minimal unitary representations from supersymmetry,” JHEP1410(2014) 008,arXiv:1406.5527 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    $\mathcal{E} \nabla^4 R^4$ type invariants and their gradient expansion

    G. Bossard and V. Verschinin, “E∇ 4R4 type invariants and their gradient expansion,” JHEP 03(2015) 089,arXiv:1411.3373 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    Small automorphic representations and degenerate Whittaker vectors

    H. P. A. Gustafsson, A. Kleinschmidt, and D. Persson, “Small automorphic representations and degenerate Whittaker vectors,”arXiv:1412.5625 [math.NT]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    The two D6R4 type invariants and their higher order generalisation

    G. Bossard and V. Verschinin, “The two∇ 6 R4 type invariants and their higher order generalisation,” JHEP07(2015) 154,arXiv:1503.04230 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    Fourier coefficients of minimal and next-to-minimal automorphic representations of simply-laced groups,

    D. Gourevitch, H. P. A. Gustafsson, A. Kleinschmidt, D. Persson, and S. Sahi, “Fourier coefficients of minimal and next-to-minimal automorphic representations of simply-laced groups,” Can. J. Math.74no. 1, (2022) 122–169,arXiv:1908.08296 [math.NT]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    1/8-BPS Couplings and Exceptional Automorphic Functions,

    G. Bossard, A. Kleinschmidt, and B. Pioline, “1/8-BPS Couplings and Exceptional Automorphic Functions,” SciPost Phys.8no. 4, (2020) 054,arXiv:2001.05562 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    SU(4) Invariant Supergravity Theory,

    E. Cremmer, J. Scherk, and S. Ferrara, “SU(4) Invariant Supergravity Theory,” Phys. Lett. B74(1978) 61–64

    work page 1978

  26. [26]

    Unification of Yang-Mills Theory and Supergravity in Ten-Dimensions,

    G. F. Chapline and N. S. Manton, “Unification of Yang-Mills Theory and Supergravity in Ten-Dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 105–109

    work page 1983

  27. [27]

    Coupling of Yang-Mills to N=4, D=4 Supergravity,

    E. Bergshoeff, I. G. Koh, and E. Sezgin, “Coupling of Yang-Mills to N=4, D=4 Supergravity,” Phys. Lett. B155(1985) 71

    work page 1985

  28. [28]

    Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory,

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory,” Phys. Lett. B149(1984) 117–122

    work page 1984

  29. [29]

    String universality in ten dimensions

    A. Adams, O. DeWolfe, and W. Taylor, “String universality in ten dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 071601,arXiv:1006.1352 [hep-th]. – 55 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  30. [30]

    d = 8 supergravity: Matter couplings, gauging and Minkowski compactification,

    A. Salam and E. Sezgin, “d = 8 supergravity: Matter couplings, gauging and Minkowski compactification,” Physics Letters B154no. 1, (Apr., 1985) 37–42

    work page 1985

  31. [31]

    Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity

    T. Banks and N. Seiberg, “Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 084019,arXiv:1011.5120 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  32. [32]

    Four-dimensionalN=4SYM theory and the swampland,

    H.-C. Kim, H.-C. Tarazi, and C. Vafa, “Four-dimensionalN=4SYM theory and the swampland,” Phys. Rev. D102no. 2, (2020) 026003,arXiv:1912.06144 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    Montero and C

    M. Montero and C. Vafa, “Cobordism Conjecture, Anomalies, and the String Lamppost Principle,” JHEP01(2021) 063,arXiv:2008.11729 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Exploring the landscape of heterotic strings onT d,

    A. Font, B. Fraiman, M. Gra˜ na, C. A. N´ u˜ nez, and H. P. De Freitas, “Exploring the landscape of heterotic strings onT d,” JHEP10(2020) 194,arXiv:2007.10358 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Exploring the landscape of CHL strings on T d,

    A. Font, B. Fraiman, M. Gra˜ na, C. A. N´ u˜ nez, and H. Parra De Freitas, “Exploring the landscape of CHL strings on T d,” JHEP08(2021) 095,arXiv:2104.07131 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    8d supergravity, reconstruction of internal geometry and the Swampland,

    Y. Hamada and C. Vafa, “8d supergravity, reconstruction of internal geometry and the Swampland,” JHEP06(2021) 178,arXiv:2104.05724 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    String Universality and Non-Simply-Connected Gauge Groups in 8d,

    M. Cvetiˇ c, M. Dierigl, L. Lin, and H. Y. Zhang, “String Universality and Non-Simply-Connected Gauge Groups in 8d,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125no. 21, (2020) 211602, arXiv:2008.10605 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Gauge group topology of 8D Chaudhuri-Hockney-Lykken vacua,

    M. Cvetic, M. Dierigl, L. Lin, and H. Y. Zhang, “Gauge group topology of 8D Chaudhuri-Hockney-Lykken vacua,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 8, (2021) 086018, arXiv:2107.04031 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    8d gauge anomalies and the topological Green-Schwarz mechanism

    I. n. Garc´ ıa-Etxebarria, H. Hayashi, K. Ohmori, Y. Tachikawa, and K. Yonekura, “8d gauge anomalies and the topological Green-Schwarz mechanism,” JHEP11(2017) 177, arXiv:1710.04218 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Strings on Orientifolds

    A. Dabholkar and J. Park, “Strings on orientifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B477(1996) 701–714, arXiv:hep-th/9604178

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  41. [41]

    The Moduli Space and M(atrix) Theory of 9d N=1 Backgrounds of M/String Theory

    O. Aharony, Z. Komargodski, and A. Patir, “The Moduli space and M(atrix) theory of 9d N=1 backgrounds of M/string theory,” JHEP05(2007) 073,arXiv:hep-th/0702195

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  42. [42]

    New supersymmetric string moduli spaces from frozen singularities,

    H. Parra De Freitas, “New supersymmetric string moduli spaces from frozen singularities,” JHEP01(2023) 170,arXiv:2209.03451 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    New supersymmetric string theories from discrete theta angles,

    M. Montero and H. Parra de Freitas, “New supersymmetric string theories from discrete theta angles,” JHEP01(2023) 091,arXiv:2209.03361 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Composite Anomalies in Supergravity,

    N. Marcus, “Composite Anomalies in Supergravity,” Phys. Lett. B157(1985) 383–388

    work page 1985

  45. [45]

    Compensating fields and anomalies,

    B. de Wit and M. T. Grisaru, “Compensating fields and anomalies,” Quantum field theory and quantum statistics2(1987) 411

    work page 1987

  46. [46]

    An SL(2,Z) anomaly in IIB supergravity and its F-theory interpretation

    M. R. Gaberdiel and M. B. Green, “An SL(2,Z) anomaly in IIB supergravity and its F theory interpretation,” JHEP11(1998) 026,arXiv:hep-th/9810153

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  47. [47]

    Discrete anomalies in supergravity and consistency of string backgrounds

    R. Minasian, S. Sasmal, and R. Savelli, “Discrete anomalies in supergravity and consistency of string backgrounds,” JHEP02(2017) 025,arXiv:1611.09575 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    E7(7) symmetry in perturbatively quantised N=8 supergravity

    G. Bossard, C. Hillmann, and H. Nicolai, “E 7(7) symmetry in perturbatively quantised N=8 supergravity,” JHEP12(2010) 052,arXiv:1007.5472 [hep-th]. – 56 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  49. [49]

    Consistency of eight-dimensional supergravities: anomalies, lattices and counterterms,

    B.-X. Lao and R. Minasian, “Consistency of eight-dimensional supergravities: anomalies, lattices and counterterms,” JHEP06(2024) 064,arXiv:2306.07766 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Triples, Fluxes, and Strings

    J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf, K. Hori, A. Keurentjes, J. Morgan, D. R. Morrison, and S. Sethi, “Triples, fluxes, and strings,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4(2002) 995–1186, arXiv:hep-th/0103170

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  51. [51]

    Symmetry enhancements in 7d heterotic strings,

    B. Fraiman and H. P. De Freitas, “Symmetry enhancements in 7d heterotic strings,” JHEP 10(2021) 002,arXiv:2106.08189 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Heterotic and Type I String Dynamics from Eleven Dimensions

    P. Horava and E. Witten, “Heterotic and Type I string dynamics from eleven dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B460(1996) 506–524,arXiv:hep-th/9510209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  53. [53]

    Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity on a Manifold with Boundary

    P. Horava and E. Witten, “Eleven-dimensional supergravity on a manifold with boundary,” Nucl. Phys. B475(1996) 94–114,arXiv:hep-th/9603142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  54. [54]

    Maximally Supersymmetric String Theories in D<10

    S. Chaudhuri, G. Hockney, and J. D. Lykken, “Maximally supersymmetric string theories in D<10,” Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 2264–2267,arXiv:hep-th/9505054

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  55. [55]

    Toroidal compactification and symmetry breaking in open string theories,

    M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi, and A. Sagnotti, “Toroidal compactification and symmetry breaking in open string theories,” Nucl. Phys. B376(1992) 365–386

    work page 1992

  56. [56]

    A Note on Toroidal Compactifications of the Type I Superstring and Other Superstring Vacuum Configurations with 16 Supercharges

    M. Bianchi, “A Note on toroidal compactifications of the type I superstring and other superstring vacuum configurations with sixteen supercharges,” Nucl. Phys. B528(1998) 73–94,arXiv:hep-th/9711201

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  57. [57]

    Dual String Pairs With N=1 And N=2 Supersymmetry In Four Dimensions

    C. Vafa and E. Witten, “Dual string pairs with N=1 and N=2 supersymmetry in four-dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.46(1996) 225–247,arXiv:hep-th/9507050

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  58. [58]

    Non-BPS D-branes and enhanced symmetry in an asymmetric orbifold

    M. Gutperle, “NonBPS D-branes and enhanced symmetry in an asymmetric orbifold,” JHEP 08(2000) 036,arXiv:hep-th/0007126

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  59. [59]

    On the systematics of open string theories,

    M. Bianchi and A. Sagnotti, “On the systematics of open string theories,” Phys. Lett. B247 (1990) 517–524

    work page 1990

  60. [60]

    Open Strings

    C. Angelantonj and A. Sagnotti, “Open strings,” Phys. Rept.371(2002) 1–150, arXiv:hep-th/0204089. [Erratum: Phys.Rept. 376, 407 (2003)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  61. [61]

    Anomalies, Characters and Strings,

    A. N. Schellekens and N. P. Warner, “Anomalies, Characters and Strings,” Nucl. Phys. B 287(1987) 317

    work page 1987

  62. [62]

    Orientifolds of String Theory Melvin backgrounds

    C. Angelantonj, E. Dudas, and J. Mourad, “Orientifolds of string theory Melvin backgrounds,” Nucl. Phys. B637(2002) 59–91,arXiv:hep-th/0205096

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  63. [63]

    Anomaly Cancelling Terms From the Elliptic Genus,

    W. Lerche, B. E. W. Nilsson, A. N. Schellekens, and N. P. Warner, “Anomaly Cancelling Terms From the Elliptic Genus,” Nucl. Phys. B299(1988) 91–116

    work page 1988

  64. [64]

    Heterotic - type I superstring duality and low-energy effective actions

    A. A. Tseytlin, “Heterotic type I superstring duality and low-energy effective actions,” Nucl. Phys. B467(1996) 383–398,arXiv:hep-th/9512081

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  65. [65]

    String theory dualities and supergravity divergences

    M. B. Green, J. G. Russo, and P. Vanhove, “String theory dualities and supergravity divergences,” JHEP06(2010) 075,arXiv:1002.3805 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  66. [66]

    Non-BPS D-branes and M-theory

    M. R. Gaberdiel and S. Schafer-Nameki, “NonBPS D branes and M theory,” JHEP09 (2001) 028,arXiv:hep-th/0108202

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  67. [67]

    Type I/heterotic duality and M-theory amplitudes

    M. B. Green and A. Rudra, “Type I/heterotic duality and M-theory amplitudes,” JHEP12 (2016) 060,arXiv:1604.00324 [hep-th]. – 57 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    Automorphic forms onO(s+ 2,2)(R) and infinite products,

    R. E. Borcherds, “Automorphic forms onO(s+ 2,2)(R) and infinite products,” Invent. Math.120no. 1, (1995) 161–213

    work page 1995

  69. [69]

    Automorphic forms with singularities on Grassmannians

    R. E. Borcherds, “Automorphic forms with singularities on Grassmannians,” Invent. Math. 132(1998) 491–562,arXiv:alg-geom/9609022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  70. [70]

    On the converse theorem for Borcherds products

    J. H. Bruinier, “On the converse theorem for borcherds products,” Journal of Algebra397 (2014) 315–342,arXiv:1210.4821 [math.NT].https://arxiv.org/abs/1210.4821

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  71. [71]

    A converse theorem for borcherds products in signature (2,2),

    P. Bieker and P. Kiefer, “A converse theorem for borcherds products in signature (2,2),” 2024.https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06610

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Hecke operators onγ 0(m),

    A. Atkin and J. Lehner, “Hecke operators onγ 0(m),” Math. Ann.185(1970) 134–160

    work page 1970

  73. [73]

    The Bianchi Classification of Maximal D=8 Gauged Supergravities

    E. Bergshoeff, U. Gran, R. Linares, M. Nielsen, T. Ortin, and D. Roest, “The Bianchi classification of maximal D = 8 gauged supergravities,” Class. Quant. Grav.20(2003) 3997–4014,arXiv:hep-th/0306179

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  74. [74]

    On the moduli space of spontaneously broken N = 8 supergravity

    F. Catino, G. Dall’Agata, G. Inverso, and F. Zwirner, “On the moduli space of spontaneously brokenN= 8 supergravity,” JHEP09(2013) 040,arXiv:1307.4389 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  75. [75]

    Four-derivative couplings and BPS dyons in heterotic CHL orbifolds

    G. Bossard, C. Cosnier-Horeau, and B. Pioline, “Four-derivative couplings and BPS dyons in heterotic CHL orbifolds,” SciPost Phys.3no. 1, (2017) 008,arXiv:1702.01926 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    A Modern Fareytail

    J. Manschot and G. W. Moore, “A Modern Farey Tail,” Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.4 (2010) 103–159,arXiv:0712.0573 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  77. [77]

    Shimura, Introduction to the arithmetic theory of automorphic function

    G. Shimura, Introduction to the arithmetic theory of automorphic function. Princeton University press, Tokyo, Aug, 1971

    work page 1971

  78. [78]

    Modular invariance for interacting bosonic strings at finite temperature,

    B. McClain and B. D. B. Roth, “Modular invariance for interacting bosonic strings at finite temperature,” Commun.Math.Phys.111(1987) 539

    work page 1987

  79. [79]

    The Rankin-Selberg method: a survey,

    D. Bump, “The Rankin-Selberg method: a survey,” in Number theory, trace formulas and discrete groups (Oslo, 1987), pp. 49–109. Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1989

    work page 1987

  80. [80]

    Moduli dependence of string loop corrections to gauge coupling constants,

    L. J. Dixon, V. Kaplunovsky, and J. Louis, “Moduli dependence of string loop corrections to gauge coupling constants,” Nucl. Phys.B355(1991) 649–688

    work page 1991

Showing first 80 references.