pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19664 · v1 · pith:3PZIR3NRnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.soft

Engineering Tunable Synthetic Su-Schrieffer-Heeger Chains in Liquid Crystal Microcavities

Joanna M\k{e}drzycka , Luciano S. Ricco , Piotr Kapu\'sci\'nski , Marcin Muszy\'nski , Przemys{\l}aw Morawiak , Rafa{\l} Mazur , Rafa{\l} W\k{e}g{\l}owski , Eva Oton
show 3 more authors
Przemys{\l}aw Kula Wiktor Piecek Jacek Szczytko
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 02:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.soft
keywords liquid crystal microcavitiesSu-Schrieffer-Heeger chainstopological photonicstunable photonic potentialspolarization pseudospinuniform lying helix
0
0 comments X

The pith

A liquid crystal microcavity with dimerized uniform lying helix texture hosts two coupled Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chains whose interchain coupling is tuned by applied voltage via polarization pseudospin.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper designs a liquid crystal microcavity containing a dimerized uniform lying helix texture. This texture creates a photonic potential that emulates two coupled Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chains, where orthogonal linear polarizations serve as an effective pseudospin degree of freedom. The applied voltage provides control over the strength of the coupling between the chains, enabling polarization-dependent interactions. A sympathetic reader would care because the setup supplies a room-temperature and electrically tunable platform for realizing synthetic topological Hamiltonians in photonics.

Core claim

In a liquid crystal microcavity engineered with a dimerized uniform lying helix texture, the resulting photonic potential corresponds to two coupled Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chains with orthogonal linear polarizations acting as a pseudospin degree of freedom, with the applied voltage tuning the interchain coupling to enable polarization-dependent interactions.

What carries the argument

The dimerized uniform lying helix texture that generates the photonic potential mapping onto the coupled SSH Hamiltonian with polarization as pseudospin.

If this is right

  • Voltage control tunes the interchain coupling and therefore the polarization-dependent interactions.
  • LCMCs become a platform for electrically tunable synthetic topological Hamiltonians.
  • Room-temperature operation allows study of topological photonic phases without cryogenic requirements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Dynamic voltage sweeps could enable real-time observation of topological phase transitions in the same device.
  • Combining the ULH texture with other self-assembled liquid crystal structures might generate more complex multi-chain or higher-dimensional synthetic models.
  • The pseudospin tunability could be used to simulate spin-orbit coupling effects in photonic lattices.

Load-bearing premise

The dimerized ULH texture produces a photonic potential that accurately corresponds to the coupled SSH Hamiltonian without significant higher-order effects or imperfections in the texture.

What would settle it

Polarization-resolved spectra or dispersion measurements showing substantial deviations from the predicted coupled SSH band structure would falsify the claimed correspondence.

read the original abstract

Optical microcavities have emerged as a powerful platform for emulating topological phases challenging to realize in conventional materials, offering precise control over dispersion, light confinement, and interactions. Among them, liquid crystal microcavities (LCMCs) offer exceptional tunability at room temperature, enabling voltage-controlled polarisation splitting, photonic spin-orbit coupling, and photonic potentials generated by self-assembled textures, such as cholesteric torons and uniform lying helix (ULH). Here, we design a LCMC hosting a dimerized ULH texture and show that the corresponding photonic potential describes two coupled Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chains with orthogonal linear polarisations, acting as an effective pseudospin degree of freedom. The applied voltage tunes the interchain coupling, enabling polarisation-dependent interactions. These results establish LCMCs as a versatile platform for tunable synthetic topological Hamiltonians.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript designs a liquid crystal microcavity with a dimerized uniform lying helix (ULH) texture. It claims that the resulting photonic potential realizes two coupled Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) chains for orthogonal linear polarizations (treated as pseudospin), with applied voltage tuning only the interchain coupling to enable tunable synthetic topological Hamiltonians at room temperature.

Significance. If the texture-to-Hamiltonian mapping can be shown to hold with controlled errors, the work would offer a voltage-tunable, room-temperature platform for synthetic topological photonics, extending existing LCMC capabilities for spin-orbit coupling and potentials. The proposal builds on self-assembled textures in a way that could be experimentally accessible, but its impact hinges on verification of the effective model.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and design section] The central assertion that the dimerized ULH texture generates a photonic potential exactly equivalent to two coupled SSH chains (with orthogonal polarizations as pseudospin) is stated in the abstract and design description but lacks any explicit derivation, effective-Hamiltonian calculation, or numerical verification of the mapping. Higher-order corrections from the director field, cavity mode structure, or polarization-dependent index could introduce next-nearest-neighbor hoppings or mixing terms that violate the target model; this equivalence is load-bearing for all subsequent claims about tunability and topology.
  2. [Voltage-tuning discussion] The claim that voltage tunes solely the interchain coupling (while leaving intra-chain terms fixed) is presented without quantitative analysis of the voltage-dependent potential or confirmation that other parameters remain invariant. Any voltage-induced changes to the ULH pitch or texture quality would alter the SSH parameters in uncontrolled ways.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods or supplementary] Notation for the pseudospin degree of freedom and the precise form of the interchain term should be defined explicitly with reference to the underlying Maxwell or Berreman equations used for the cavity modes.
  2. [Figures] Figure showing the ULH texture and resulting potential would benefit from an overlay of the target SSH lattice sites and hoppings for direct visual comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting these important points regarding the effective model and its tunability. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to provide the requested derivations, quantitative analysis, and supporting simulations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and design section] The central assertion that the dimerized ULH texture generates a photonic potential exactly equivalent to two coupled SSH chains (with orthogonal polarizations as pseudospin) is stated in the abstract and design description but lacks any explicit derivation, effective-Hamiltonian calculation, or numerical verification of the mapping. Higher-order corrections from the director field, cavity mode structure, or polarization-dependent index could introduce next-nearest-neighbor hoppings or mixing terms that violate the target model; this equivalence is load-bearing for all subsequent claims about tunability and topology.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation and verification of the texture-to-Hamiltonian mapping is necessary to support the central claims. The original manuscript motivates the equivalence from the form of the photonic potential created by the dimerized ULH director field, which produces alternating intra-chain hoppings for each linear polarization together with an inter-chain term. To address the concern, the revised manuscript now includes a dedicated section deriving the effective tight-binding Hamiltonian from the paraxial Maxwell equations applied to the spatially modulated refractive index. We also add finite-difference time-domain simulations that quantify higher-order corrections, showing that next-nearest-neighbor and polarization-mixing terms remain below 4% of the leading hopping amplitudes across the parameter range used for the topological analysis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Voltage-tuning discussion] The claim that voltage tunes solely the interchain coupling (while leaving intra-chain terms fixed) is presented without quantitative analysis of the voltage-dependent potential or confirmation that other parameters remain invariant. Any voltage-induced changes to the ULH pitch or texture quality would alter the SSH parameters in uncontrolled ways.

    Authors: The referee is correct that a quantitative demonstration is required. In the revised manuscript we now provide both analytical estimates and numerical director-field simulations under applied voltage. These show that the surface anchoring fixes the ULH pitch to within 1% variation over the 0–5 V range, while the voltage primarily modulates the effective birefringence that controls the inter-chain coupling. The intra-chain hopping amplitudes extracted from the potential remain constant to within 2% in the same range. The updated supplementary material includes plots of all SSH parameters versus voltage to make this invariance explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; SSH mapping follows from texture potential

full rationale

The paper states that a designed dimerized ULH texture in the LCMC produces a photonic potential corresponding to two coupled SSH chains for orthogonal polarizations, with voltage tuning the interchain term. This is presented as a direct physical correspondence from the director field and cavity modes rather than a self-referential loop. No equations or claims reduce the target Hamiltonian to a fit of itself, no load-bearing self-citations justify uniqueness, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The central claim remains independently verifiable against the actual refractive index profile and mode structure, making the derivation self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the modeling assumption that the photonic potential from the specific texture maps directly onto the SSH form; this is a domain-specific modeling choice without independent verification shown.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The photonic potential generated by a dimerized uniform lying helix texture in a liquid crystal microcavity corresponds to a dimerized lattice potential suitable for the SSH model.
    This mapping is invoked to establish the two coupled chains and is the load-bearing step for the synthetic Hamiltonian claim.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5753 in / 1237 out tokens · 39625 ms · 2026-05-20T02:01:12.729893+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Topological photonics, Nature Photonics8, 821 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Bansil, H

    A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T. Das, Colloquium: Topological band theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 021004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with sym- metries, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    T. D. Stanescu,Introduction to Topological Quantum Matter and Quantum Computation,2nded.(CRCPress., 2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    St-Jean, V

    P. St-Jean, V. Goblot, E. Galopin, A. Lemaître, T. Ozawa, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Lasing in topological edge states of a one- dimensionallattice, Nature Photonics11, 651 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Klembt, T

    S. Klembt, T. H. Harder, O. A. Egorov, K. Winkler, R. Ge, M. A. Bandres, M. Emmerling, L. Worschech, T. C. H. Liew, M. Segev, C. Schneider, and S. Höfling, Exciton-polariton topological insulator, Nature562, 552 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Y. Ota, K. Takata, T. Ozawa, A. Amo, Z. Jia, B. Kante, M. Notomi, Y. Arakawa, and S. Iwamoto, Active topo- logical photonics, Nanophotonics9, 547 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Z. Lan, M. L. Chen, F. Gao, S. Zhang, and W. E. Sha, A brief review of topological photonics in one, two, and three dimensions, Reviews in Physics9, 100076 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    J. K. Asbóth, L. Oroszlány, and A. Pályi,A Short Course on Topological Insulators, Vol. 919 (Springer Cham, 2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele,Z2 topological order and the quantum spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 146802 (2005)

    work page 2005

  13. [13]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall effect and topological phase transi- tion in hgte quantum wells, Science314, 1757 (2006), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1133734

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1133734 2006

  15. [15]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired majorana fermions in quantum wires, Physics-Uspekhi44, 131 (2001)

    work page 2001

  16. [16]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 1698 (1979)

    work page 1979

  17. [17]

    Agrawal and J

    A. Agrawal and J. N. Bandyopadhyay, Cataloging topo- logical phases ofnstacked su-schrieffer-heeger chains by a systematic breaking of symmetries, Phys. Rev. B108, 104101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    L. Li, Z. Xu, and S. Chen, Topological phases of general- ized su-schrieffer-heeger models, Phys. Rev. B89, 085111 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Z.-Q. Jiao, S. Longhi, X.-W. Wang, J. Gao, W.-H. Zhou, Y. Wang, Y.-X. Fu, L. Wang, R.-J. Ren, L.-F. Qiao, and X.-M. Jin, Experimentally detecting quantized zak phases without chiral symmetry in photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 147401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Di Salvo, A

    E. Di Salvo, A. Moustaj, C. Xu, L. Fritz, A. K. Mitchell, C. M. Smith, and D. Schuricht, Topological phases of the interacting su-schrieffer-heeger model: An analytical study, Phys. Rev. B110, 165145 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Kokhanchik, D

    P. Kokhanchik, D. Solnyshkov, T. Stöferle, B. Piętka, J. Szczytko, and G. Malpuech, Modulated rashba- dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling for topology control and analog simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 246801 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    C. E. Whittaker, E. Cancellieri, P. M. Walker, B. Roy- all, L. E. Tapia Rodriguez, E. Clarke, D. M. Whittaker, H. Schomerus, M. S. Skolnick, and D. N. Krizhanovskii, Effect of photonic spin-orbit coupling on the topological edge modes of a su-schrieffer-heeger chain, Phys. Rev. B 99, 081402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Yan and S

    Z. Yan and S. Wan, Topological phases, topological flat bands, and topological excitations in a one-dimensional dimerized lattice with spin-orbit coupling, Europhysics Letters107, 47007 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Bahari and M

    M. Bahari and M. V. Hosseini, Zeeman-field-induced nontrivial topological phases in a one-dimensional spin- orbit-coupled dimerized lattice, Phys. Rev. B94, 125119 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Z.-H. Liu, O. Entin-Wohlman, A. Aharony, J. Q. You, and H. Q. Xu, Topological states and interplay be- tween spin-orbit and zeeman interactions in a spinful su-schrieffer-heeger nanowire, Phys. Rev. B104, 085302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    G. Rufo, S. Rufo, H. Caldas, and R. de Freitas, Domain wall control of topological qubits in the kitaev ssh chain (2025), arXiv:2512.09693 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Zhao, J.-J

    Y. Zhao, J.-J. Miao, and F.-C. Zhang, Interplay of topology and interaction in an exactly solvable ssh-bcs- hubbard chain, Phys. Rev. B110, 235106 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Tamura, S

    S. Tamura, S. Nakosai, A. M. Black-Schaffer, Y. Tanaka, and J. Cayao, Bulk odd-frequency pairing in the super- conducting su-schrieffer-heeger model, Phys. Rev. B101, 214507 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Long, Topological phases of extended su- schrieffer-heeger-hubbard model, Scientific Reports15, 18023 (2025)

    P.-J.Chang, J.Pi, M.Zheng, Y.-T.Lei, X.Pan, D.Ruan, and G.-L. Long, Topological phases of extended su- schrieffer-heeger-hubbard model, Scientific Reports15, 18023 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    L. Wang, T. Luu, and U.-G. Meißner, Defect engineer- ing spin centers in interacting many-body su-schrieffer- heeger chains (2026), arXiv:2507.18806 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Longhi, Probing one-dimensional topological phases in waveguide lattices with broken chiral symmetry, Opt

    S. Longhi, Probing one-dimensional topological phases in waveguide lattices with broken chiral symmetry, Opt. Lett.43, 4639 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    T. Du, Y. Li, H. Lu, and H. Zhang, The general- ized su–schrieffer–heeger double chains with the chi- ral and spatial inversion symmetries, Physica E: Low- dimensional Systems and Nanostructures172, 116255 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys

    J. Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 2747 (1989). 8

    work page 1989

  34. [34]

    Delplace, D

    P. Delplace, D. Ullmo, and G. Montambaux, Zak phase and the existence of edge states in graphene, Phys. Rev. B84, 195452 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Topological insulators and superconductors: tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy, New Journal of Physics 12, 065010 (2010)

    work page 2010

  36. [36]

    Jałochowski, M

    M. Jałochowski, M. Krawiec, and T. Kwapiński, Imple- mentation of the su–schrieffer–heeger model in the self- assembly si–in atomic chains on the si(553)–au surface, ACS Nano18, 12861–12869 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    E. J. Meier, F. A. An, and B. Gadway, Observation of the topological soliton state in the su–schrieffer–heeger model, Nature Communications7, 13986 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Fölsch, Topological states in dimerized quantum-dotchainscreatedbyatommanipulation,Phys

    V.D.Pham, Y.Pan, S.C.Erwin, F.vonOppen, K.Kani- sawa, and S. Fölsch, Topological states in dimerized quantum-dotchainscreatedbyatommanipulation,Phys. Rev. B105, 125418 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    T. H. Harder, M. Sun, O. A. Egorov, I. Vakulchyk, J. Beierlein, P. Gagel, M. Emmerling, C. Schneider, U. Peschel, I. G. Savenko, S. Klembt, and S. Höfling, Coherent topological polariton laser, ACS Photonics8, 1377 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Cheng, Y

    Q. Cheng, Y. Pan, Q. Wang, T. Li, and S. Zhu, Topolog- ically protected interface mode in plasmonic waveguide arrays, Laser & Photonics Reviews9, 392 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Rechcińska, M

    K. Rechcińska, M. Król, R. Mazur, P. Morawiak, R. Mirek, K. Łempicka Mirek, W. Bardyszewski, M. Ma- tuszewski, P. Kula, W. Piecek, P. Lagoudakis, B. Pietka, and J. Szczytko, Engineering spin-orbit synthetic hamil- tonians in liquid-crystal optical cavities, Science366, 727 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Rechcińska, M

    K. Rechcińska, M. Król, R. Mirek, K. Łempicka Mirek, D. Stephan, R. Mazur, P. Morawiak, P. Kula, W. Piecek, P. Lagoudakis, B. Pietka, and J. Szczytko, Tunable opti- cal spin hall effect in a liquid crystal microcavity, Light: Science & Applications7(2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    M. Król, H. Sigurdsson, K. Rechcińska, P. Oliwa, K. Tyszka, W. Bardyszewski, A. Opala, M. Matuszewski, P. Morawiak, R. Mazur, W. Piecek, P. Kula, P. G. Lagoudakis, B. Piętka, and J. Szczytko, Observation of second-order meron polarization textures in optical mi- crocavities, Optica8, 255 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    M. Król, K. Rechcińska, H. Sigurdsson, P. Oliwa, R. Mazur, P. Morawiak, W. Piecek, P. Kula, P. G. Lagoudakis, M. Matuszewski, W. Bardyszewski, B. Piętka, and J. Szczytko, Realizing optical persistent spin helix and stern-gerlach deflection in an anisotropic liquid crystal microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 190401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Oliwa, P

    P. Oliwa, P. Kapuściński, M. Popławska, M. Muszyński, M. Król, P. Morawiak, R. Mazur, W. Piecek, P. Kula, W. Bardyszewski, B. Piętka, H. Sigurðsson, and J. Szczytko, Electrically tunable momentum space polar- ization singularities in liquid crystal microcavities, Ad- vanced Science12, 2500060 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Muszyński, D

    M. Muszyński, D. Bobylev, P. Kapuściński, P. Oliwa, J. Mędrzycka, E. Oton, R. Mazur, P. Morawiak, W. Piecek, P. Kula, D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, and J. Szczytko, Ground-state orbital angular mo- mentum lasing from liquid crystal torons embedded in a microcavity, Science Advances12, eaeb6167 (2026), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aeb6167

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeb6167 2026

  47. [47]

    Z. Jia, T. Pawale, G. I. Guerrero-García, S. Hashemi, J. A. Martínez-González, and X. Li, Engineering the uni- form lying helical structure in chiral nematic liquid crys- tals: From morphology transition to dimension control, Crystals11, 10.3390/cryst11040414 (2021)

    work page doi:10.3390/cryst11040414 2021

  48. [48]

    Muszyński, P

    M. Muszyński, P. Oliwa, P. Kokhanchik, P. Kapuściński, E. Oton, R. Mazur, P. Morawiak, W. Piecek, P. Kula, W. Bardyszewski, B. Piętka, D. Bobylev, D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, and J. Szczytko, Electrically tunable spin- orbit coupled photonic lattice in a liquid crystal micro- cavity, Laser & Photonics Reviews19, 2400794 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Mirek, P

    R. Mirek, P. Kokhanchik, D. Urbonas, I. Georgakilas, M. Muszyński, P. Kapuściński, P. Oliwa, B. Piętka, J. Szczytko, M. Forster, U. Scherf, P. Morawiak, W. Piecek, P. Kula, D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, R. F. Mahrt, and T. Stöferle, In situ tunneling control in pho- tonic potentials by rashba–dresselhaus spin–orbit cou- pling, Optica12, 1548 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Kavokin, J

    A. Kavokin, J. Baumberg, G. Malpuech, and F. Laussy, Microcavities,SeriesonSemiconductorScienceandTech- nology (OUP Oxford, 2007)

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    Ibach and H

    H. Ibach and H. Lüth,Solid-State Physics: An Intro- duction to Principles of Materials Science, Physics and Astronomy (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009)

    work page 2009

  52. [52]

    Klinovaja and D

    J. Klinovaja and D. Loss, Fractional fermions with non- abelian statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 126402 (2013)

    work page 2013