pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19941 · v1 · pith:6NROACVMnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🪐 quant-ph

Perturbative approach to the first law of quantum thermodynamics

Mario Reis , Maron F. Anka , Vinicius Gomes de Paula , Clebson Cruz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 05:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum thermodynamicsfirst lawquantum coherenceperturbative expansioncoherent heatcoherent workFermi golden rulenonequilibrium thermodynamics
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:6NROACVM Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number? 
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{6NROACVM}

Prints a linked pith:6NROACVM badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

Perturbative expansion decomposes quantum coherence into coherent heat and coherent work without extra energy terms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a time-dependent perturbative framework for the first law of quantum thermodynamics and expands the relevant quantities to second order. It derives explicit corrections for work, heat, and coherence, then shows that the coherence contribution splits consistently into coherent heat and coherent work. The result indicates that quantum coherence does not introduce an independent energetic quantity beyond standard heat and work. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach removes inconsistencies in earlier quantum first-law formulations and links second-order corrections directly to microscopic transition rates. The method supplies a transparent way to analyze driven quantum systems and nonequilibrium processes.

Core claim

By applying a time-dependent perturbative framework to the first law of quantum thermodynamics and expanding thermodynamic quantities up to second order, explicit perturbative corrections are obtained for work, heat, and coherence. The coherence term decomposes consistently into coherent heat and coherent work. This shows that quantum coherence does not require an independent energetic contribution beyond heat and work. The formalism resolves inconsistencies in prior quantum first-law statements, including the interpretation of coherence and its link to entropy fluxes, while connecting second-order corrections to transition rates from Fermi's golden rule.

What carries the argument

Time-dependent perturbative expansion of thermodynamic quantities to second order, which decomposes the coherence term into coherent heat and coherent work while linking corrections to Fermi's golden rule transition rates.

If this is right

  • Second-order corrections become directly connected to microscopic transition rates governed by Fermi's golden rule.
  • The formalism supplies a bridge between microscopic quantum transitions and macroscopic thermodynamic quantities.
  • It resolves the interpretation of coherence contributions and their connection with entropy fluxes.
  • The approach provides a physically transparent framework for coherence-driven thermodynamic processes in driven quantum systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same perturbative decomposition could be tested in concrete models such as a driven qubit or harmonic oscillator to obtain explicit numerical expressions for coherent heat and work.
  • The connection to Fermi's golden rule opens a route to combine the method with standard scattering or master-equation techniques in open quantum systems.
  • Higher-order extensions of the expansion might reveal whether the decomposition remains valid beyond the second-order regime assumed here.

Load-bearing premise

The time-dependent perturbative framework up to second order accurately captures the thermodynamic quantities and permits a consistent decomposition of coherence contributions without additional system-specific assumptions.

What would settle it

Direct computation or measurement in a driven two-level quantum system at second order showing whether the energy balance is fully accounted for by the sum of coherent heat and coherent work, or whether a residual independent coherence energy term appears.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19941 by Clebson Cruz, Mario Reis, Maron F. Anka, Vinicius Gomes de Paula.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. First- and second-order work, heat, and internal energy of our example. Parameters: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In quantum thermodynamics, the decomposition of energy exchanges into heat and work remains an open problem beyond weak-coupling and slow-driving regimes. Recent formulations have shown that quantum coherence introduces additional energy contributions whose thermodynamic interpretation is still under debate, raising fundamental questions about the structure of the quantum first law. In this work, we investigate this problem through a time-dependent perturbative framework applied to the first law of quantum thermodynamics. By expanding the thermodynamic quantities up to second order, we derive explicit perturbative corrections for work, heat, and coherence contributions. Our results show that the coherence term can be consistently decomposed into coherent heat and coherent work, demonstrating that quantum coherence does not require the introduction of an independent energetic contribution beyond heat and work. The formalism resolves inconsistencies associated with previous formulations of the quantum first law, including the interpretation of coherence contributions and their connection with entropy fluxes. At second order, the perturbative corrections become directly connected to transition rates governed by Fermi's golden rule, establishing a bridge between microscopic quantum transitions and macroscopic thermodynamic quantities. These results provide a physically transparent framework to investigate coherence-driven thermodynamic processes and offer new perspectives for the analysis of driven quantum systems and nonequilibrium quantum technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a time-dependent perturbative expansion (to second order) of the quantum first law for a driven open system. It decomposes the coherence contribution appearing in the energy balance into a coherent-heat term and a coherent-work term, argues that this decomposition is consistent and does not require an extra independent energetic quantity, and shows that the second-order corrections are directly proportional to Fermi-golden-rule transition rates. The approach is claimed to resolve earlier inconsistencies in the interpretation of coherence in quantum thermodynamics.

Significance. If the decomposition is shown to be unique and gauge-invariant, the work supplies a concrete, microscopically grounded route from unitary evolution to thermodynamic fluxes that is directly testable in driven quantum systems. The explicit link to Fermi’s golden rule rates is a clear strength, as it converts abstract coherence terms into measurable transition probabilities without additional system-specific assumptions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Perturbative expansion of the first law] The central claim that the coherence term admits a unique split into coherent heat and coherent work rests on a specific partitioning of the time-dependent Hamiltonian into system, interaction, and driving pieces. Different choices of interaction picture or driving gauge can reassign second-order contributions between the two coherent terms while leaving the total energy balance unchanged. The manuscript does not demonstrate that the final thermodynamic interpretation remains invariant under such repartitionings (see the derivation of the second-order energy fluxes).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Section 2] Notation for the interaction-picture operators and the time-dependent driving should be introduced with explicit definitions before the perturbative expansion begins.
  2. [Results] The connection between the second-order rates and Fermi’s golden rule is stated but not derived in detail; a short appendix showing the explicit reduction would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comment on the perturbative expansion of the first law. The point concerning uniqueness and gauge invariance of the decomposition is well taken. We address it directly below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional discussion and clarification.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the coherence term admits a unique split into coherent heat and coherent work rests on a specific partitioning of the time-dependent Hamiltonian into system, interaction, and driving pieces. Different choices of interaction picture or driving gauge can reassign second-order contributions between the two coherent terms while leaving the total energy balance unchanged. The manuscript does not demonstrate that the final thermodynamic interpretation remains invariant under such repartitionings (see the derivation of the second-order energy fluxes).

    Authors: We agree that the explicit split of the coherence contribution into coherent heat and coherent work is tied to the chosen partitioning of the total Hamiltonian and the interaction picture. In our framework this partitioning is fixed by the physical setup: the time-dependent driving is included in the system Hamiltonian H_S(t), the system-bath coupling defines the interaction term, and the perturbative expansion is performed in the interaction picture generated by the free system-plus-bath evolution. Under this standard choice the second-order corrections are directly proportional to the Fermi-golden-rule transition rates, which are themselves gauge-independent observables. While a different interaction picture or driving gauge can redistribute second-order terms between the two coherent fluxes, their sum—the total coherence contribution to the energy balance—remains invariant, as does the connection to measurable transition probabilities. We will revise the manuscript by adding a short subsection (or appendix) that explicitly examines an alternative partitioning and demonstrates that the key physical predictions, including the link to Fermi’s golden rule rates and the consistency of the first law, are robust. This addition will clarify the scope of the claimed uniqueness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation grounded in standard perturbation theory

full rationale

The paper's central derivation expands thermodynamic quantities to second order in a time-dependent perturbative framework and connects corrections to Fermi's golden rule transition rates. This uses external, standard quantum mechanics tools rather than self-defining the coherence decomposition or fitting parameters that are then relabeled as predictions. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or uniqueness theorems imported from the same authors appear in the abstract or described chain. The split of coherence into coherent heat and work is presented as a derived result from the expansion, not a tautological redefinition of inputs. The framework is self-contained against external benchmarks like Fermi's rule.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract, no explicit free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are identifiable; framework rests on standard time-dependent perturbation theory in open quantum systems.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Time-dependent perturbation theory applies to the thermodynamic quantities in the driven quantum system
    The expansion of work, heat, and coherence terms relies on this standard method from quantum mechanics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1111 out tokens · 50267 ms · 2026-05-20T05:26:33.017089+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    coherent work

    and presented in Eq. (12). Our goal is to expand the heat in the formQ(t) =Q (0)(t) +Q (1)(t) +Q (2)(t) + · · ·, whereQ (0)(t) is of zeroth order,Q (1)(t) is of first order, andQ (2)(t) is of second order in the perturbation. By substituting Eqs. (32) and (38) into Eq. (12), we can rewrite it as Q(t) = Z t 0 dt′X n,k En(t′) h c(0) nk 2 + 2 Re nh c(0) nk i...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Zeroth order To zeroth order in the perturbation, the system’s dy- namics produce neither transitions nor quantum coher- ences. The zeroth-order work is directly given by W (0)(t) = X n En(t)−E n(0) ⟨n|ˆρ(0)|n⟩.(69) This indicates that the variation of the internal energy is solely due to the explicit time dependence of the energy levels, weighted by the ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The first-order work is provided by Eq

    First order To first order in the perturbation, the variation of in- ternal energy is influenced by the generation of quantum coherences, while the energy level populations remain un- changed. The first-order work is provided by Eq. (42), W (1)(t) =− 2i ℏ Z t 0 dt′ Z t′ 0 dt′′X k ⟨k|[ ˆVI(t′′),ˆρ(0)] ˙ˆH(t ′)|k⟩, (72) indicating that this contribution ari...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Second order At second order in the perturbation, the change in in- ternal energy becomes governed by the transition prob- abilities induced by the first-order generated quantum coherences. Unlike the linear regime, where coherences appear only as superpositions, at second order they effec- tively control the system’s energy redistribution, giving rise to...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Binder, L

    F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso, Fundamental Theories of Physics195, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Deffner and S

    S. Deffner and S. Campbell,Quantum Thermodynamics: An introduction to the thermodynamics of quantum in- formation(Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Strasberg,Quantum Stochastic Thermodynamics: Foundations and Selected Applications(Oxford Univer- sity Press, 2022)

    P. Strasberg,Quantum Stochastic Thermodynamics: Foundations and Selected Applications(Oxford Univer- sity Press, 2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    J. Yi, P. Talkner, and Y. W. Kim, Physical Review E 96, 022108 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    X. Ding, J. Yi, Y. W. Kim, and P. Talkner, Physical Review E98, 042122 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    A. N. Jordan, C. Elouard, and A. Auff` eves, Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations7, 203 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Elouard, D

    C. Elouard, D. A. Herrera-Mart´ ı, M. Clusel, and A. Auff` eves, npj Quantum Information3, 9 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Streltsov, G

    A. Streltsov, G. Adesso, and M. B. Plenio, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 041003 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    J. P. Santos, L. C. C´ eleri, G. T. Landi, and M. Pater- nostro, npj Quantum Information5, 23 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Francica, J

    G. Francica, J. Goold, and F. Plastina, Physical Review E99, 042105 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Francica, F

    G. Francica, F. C. Binder, G. Guarnieri, M. T. Mitchison, J. Goold, and F. Plastina, Physical Review Letters125, 180603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Gour, Prx quantum3, 040323 (2022)

    G. Gour, Prx quantum3, 040323 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Touil, B

    A. Touil, B. C ¸ akmak, and S. Deffner, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical55, 025301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Francica, Physical Review E105, L052101 (2022)

    G. Francica, Physical Review E105, L052101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    C. Cruz, M. F. Anka, M. S. Reis, R. Bachelard, and A. C. Santos, Quantum Science and Technology7, 025020 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    B´ eny, C

    C. B´ eny, C. T. Chubb, T. Farrelly, and T. J. Osborne, Nature Communications9, 3792 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Cruz, Physica B: Condensed Matter653, 414485 (2023)

    C. Cruz, Physica B: Condensed Matter653, 414485 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Moroder, O

    M. Moroder, O. Culhane, K. Zawadzki, and J. Goold, Physical Review Letters133, 140404 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Roßnagel, O

    J. Roßnagel, O. Abah, F. Schmidt-Kaler, K. Singer, and E. Lutz, Physical review letters112, 030602 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    N. M. Myers and S. Deffner, Physical Review E101, 012110 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Ciccarello, S

    F. Ciccarello, S. Lorenzo, V. Giovannetti, and G. M. Palma, Physics Reports954, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Jaeger, From Entanglement to Quantum Computing and Other Super-Technologies

    L. Jaeger, From Entanglement to Quantum Computing and Other Super-Technologies. Copernicus (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Atzori and R

    M. Atzori and R. Sessoli, Journal of the American Chem- ical Society141, 11339 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    I. H. Deutsch, PRX Quantum1, 020101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Auffeves, PRX Quantum3, 020101 (2022)

    A. Auffeves, PRX Quantum3, 020101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Patra, R

    B. Patra, R. M. Incandela, J. P. Van Dijk, H. A. Ho- mulle, L. Song, M. Shahmohammadi, R. B. Staszewski, A. Vladimirescu, M. Babaie, F. Sebastiano,et al., IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits53, 309 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Krinner, S

    S. Krinner, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, J. Heinsoo, R. Keller, J. Luetolf, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, EPJ Quantum Technology6, 2 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Quan, Y.-x

    H.-T. Quan, Y.-x. Liu, C.-P. Sun, and F. Nori, Physical Review E76, 031105 (2007)

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    H. T. Quan, Physical Review E79, 041129 (2009)

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    Kosloff and A

    R. Kosloff and A. Levy, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry65, 365 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Ghosh, W

    A. Ghosh, W. Niedenzu, V. Mukherjee, and G. Kurizki, 18 Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Fundamental Aspects and New Directions , 37 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    M. O. Scully, M. S. Zubairy, G. S. Agarwal, and H. Walther, Science299, 862 (2003)

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    Uzdin, A

    R. Uzdin, A. Levy, and R. Kosloff, Physical Review X 5, 031044 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    Lostaglio, D

    M. Lostaglio, D. Jennings, and T. Rudolph, Nature com- munications6, 6383 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Korzekwa, M

    K. Korzekwa, M. Lostaglio, J. Oppenheim, and D. Jen- nings, New Journal of Physics18, 023045 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Kammerlander and J

    P. Kammerlander and J. Anders, Scientific reports6, 22174 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Leff and A

    H. Leff and A. F. Rex,Maxwell’s Demon 2 Entropy, Clas- sical and Quantum Information, Computing(CRC Press, 2002)

    work page 2002

  42. [42]

    Sagawa, Progress of theoretical physics127, 1 (2012)

    T. Sagawa, Progress of theoretical physics127, 1 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    J. M. Parrondo, J. M. Horowitz, and T. Sagawa, Nature physics11, 131 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Campisi, P

    M. Campisi, P. Talkner, and P. H¨ anggi, Physical review letters102, 210401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  45. [45]

    Campisi, P

    M. Campisi, P. H¨ anggi, and P. Talkner, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics83, 771 (2011)

    work page 2011

  46. [46]

    ˚Aberg, Physical Review X8, 011019 (2018)

    J. ˚Aberg, Physical Review X8, 011019 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Micadei, G

    K. Micadei, G. T. Landi, and E. Lutz, Physical Review Letters124, 090602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    G. T. Landi and M. Paternostro, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 035008 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Micadei, J

    K. Micadei, J. P. Peterson, A. M. Souza, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, G. T. Landi, T. B. Batalh˜ ao, R. M. Serra, and E. Lutz, Nature communications10, 2456 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    N. M. Myers, O. Abah, and S. Deffner, AVS Quantum Science4, 027101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Campbell, I

    S. Campbell, I. d’Amico, M. A. Ciampini, J. Anders, N. Ares, S. Artini, A. Auff` eves, L. Bassman Oftelie, L. P. Bettmann, M. V. Bonan¸ ca,et al., Quantum Science and Technology11, 012501 (2026)

    work page 2026

  52. [52]

    Sekimoto,Stochastic energetics, Vol

    K. Sekimoto,Stochastic energetics, Vol. 799 (Springer, 2010)

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    Peliti and S

    L. Peliti and S. Pigolotti,Stochastic thermodynamics: an introduction(Princeton University Press, 2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Shiraishi, Fundamental Theories of Physics

    N. Shiraishi, Fundamental Theories of Physics. Springer, Singapore (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Talkner, E

    P. Talkner, E. Lutz, and P. H¨ anggi, Physical Review E 75, 050102 (2007)

    work page 2007

  56. [56]

    Kosloff and Y

    R. Kosloff and Y. Rezek, Entropy19, 136 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    F. J. Pe˜ na, O. Negrete, N. Cort´ es, and P. Vargas, En- tropy22, 755 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Solfanelli, M

    A. Solfanelli, M. Falsetti, and M. Campisi, Physical Re- view B101, 054513 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    M. F. Anka, T. R. de Oliveira, and D. Jonathan, Physical Review E104, 054128 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Piccitto, M

    G. Piccitto, M. Campisi, and D. Rossini, New Journal of Physics24, 103023 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Cherubim, T

    C. Cherubim, T. R. de Oliveira, and D. Jonathan, Phys- ical Review E105, 044120 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    Alicki, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Gen- eral12, L103 (1979)

    R. Alicki, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Gen- eral12, L103 (1979)

    work page 1979

  63. [63]

    Alipour, A

    S. Alipour, A. Rezakhani, A. Chenu, A. Del Campo, and T. Ala-Nissila, Physical Review A105, L040201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    Ahmadi, S

    B. Ahmadi, S. Salimi, and A. Khorashad, Scientific Re- ports13, 160 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    E. B. Botosso, J. S. Sales, and N. G. de Almeida, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03369 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    [59, 60] were only published in 2022 and 2023, respectively, they were first introduced in 2019, whereas Bert´ ulio’s work dates to 2020

    Although Refs. [59, 60] were only published in 2022 and 2023, respectively, they were first introduced in 2019, whereas Bert´ ulio’s work dates to 2020

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    de Lima Bernardo, Physical Review E102, 062152 (2020)

    B. de Lima Bernardo, Physical Review E102, 062152 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems(OUP Oxford, 2002)

    work page 2002

  69. [69]

    D. A. Lidar, arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00967 (2019)

    work page arXiv 1902

  70. [70]

    Reis,Quantum Mechanics: Theory and Applications (Academic Press, Elsevier, 2025)

    M. Reis,Quantum Mechanics: Theory and Applications (Academic Press, Elsevier, 2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    B. d. L. Bernardo, Phys. Rev. E102, 062152 (2020)

    work page 2020