pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20153 · v1 · pith:5TBYW33Inew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

The exceptional 2017 gamma-ray flare of the radio galaxy NGC 1275: VERITAS and Multiwavelength Observations

A. Acharyya , A. Archer , P. Bangale , J. T. Bartkoske , W. Benbow , Y. Chen , J. L. Christiansen , A. J. Chromey
show 61 more authors
A. Duerr M. Errando M. Escobar Godoy A. Falcone S. Feldman Q. Feng S. Filbert L. Fortson A. Furniss W. Hanlon O. Hervet C. E. Hinrichs J. Holder Z. Hughes M. Iskakova W. Jin M. N. Johnson P. Kaaret M. Kertzman M. Kherlakian D. Kieda T. K. Kleiner N. Korzoun F. Krennrich S. Kundu M. J. Lang M. Lundy G. Maier E. Meyer P. Moriarty R. Mukherjee W. Ning M. Ohishi R. A. Ong A. Pandey J. Escudero Pedrosa M. Pohl E. Pueschel J. Quinn P. L. Rabinowitz K. Ragan P. T. Reynolds D. Ribeiro E. Roache C. Rulten I. Sadeh L. Saha M. Santander G. H. Sembroski R. Shang M. Splettstoesser D. Tak A. K. Talluri J. V. Tucci J. Valverde V. V. Vassiliev D. A. Williams S. L. Wong T. Yoshikoshi P. S. Smith J. Kataoka
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 03:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords NGC 1275gamma-ray flareVERITASmultiwavelengthradio galaxyjet modelingC3 component
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multi-band SED modeling of the 2017 NGC 1275 flare supports a two-component jet model with gamma-ray emission near the C3 radio component at a 10-degree viewing angle.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents VERITAS observations of the declining phase of an exceptional very-high-energy gamma-ray flare from the radio galaxy NGC 1275 in January 2017, when the flux reached about 0.5 Crab units. Spectra from the flare show a long-term harder-when-brighter trend and a change between January 1 and 2 from a power-law shape with exponential cutoff to a log-parabola. Multiwavelength spectral energy distributions constructed for those two nights are fitted with a blob-in-jet model that favors two distinct emission components.

Core claim

The blob-in-jet modeling of the SEDs results in support for a two-component model with a jet angle of 10 degrees to the line of sight and the gamma-ray emission zone located in the vicinity of the C3 radio component.

What carries the argument

A two-component blob-in-jet model fitted to the multi-band spectral energy distributions during the flare peak and decline.

If this is right

  • The gamma-ray flare emission is physically tied to the location of the C3 radio feature.
  • The jet viewing angle is constrained to approximately 10 degrees.
  • The observed change in spectral shape between January 1 and 2 arises from the relative evolution of the two emission components.
  • The harder-when-brighter behavior seen over years in VERITAS data is consistent with the same jet structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar two-component modeling may locate high-energy emission zones in other radio galaxies that show distinct radio components.
  • Continued radio monitoring of C3 could serve as a predictor for future gamma-ray flares in NGC 1275.
  • The results imply that internal jet processes rather than external fields dominate the flare variability.

Load-bearing premise

The two-component blob-in-jet model is sufficient to describe the observed SEDs without major contributions from other emission regions or external photon fields.

What would settle it

An observation that places the gamma-ray emission zone far from the C3 radio component or that allows a single-component model to fit the January 1 and 2 SEDs equally well would challenge the two-component interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20153 by A. Acharyya, A. Archer, A. Duerr, A. Falcone, A. Furniss, A. J. Chromey, A. K. Talluri, A. Pandey, C. E. Hinrichs, C. Rulten, D. A. Williams, D. Kieda, D. Ribeiro, D. Tak, E. Meyer, E. Pueschel, E. Roache, F. Krennrich, G. H. Sembroski, G. Maier, I. Sadeh, J. Escudero Pedrosa, J. Holder, J. Kataoka, J. L. Christiansen, J. Quinn, J. T. Bartkoske, J. Valverde, J. V. Tucci, K. Ragan, L. Fortson, L. Saha, M. Errando, M. Escobar Godoy, M. Iskakova, M. J. Lang, M. Kertzman, M. Kherlakian, M. Lundy, M. N. Johnson, M. Ohishi, M. Pohl, M. Santander, M. Splettstoesser, N. Korzoun, O. Hervet, P. Bangale, P. Kaaret, P. L. Rabinowitz, P. Moriarty, P. S. Smith, P. T. Reynolds, Q. Feng, R. A. Ong, R. Mukherjee, R. Shang, S. Feldman, S. Filbert, S. Kundu, S. L. Wong, T. K. Kleiner, T. Yoshikoshi, V. V. Vassiliev, W. Benbow, W. Hanlon, W. Jin, W. Ning, Y. Chen, Z. Hughes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The daily-binned multiwavelength light curve of NGC 1275 for the VERITAS observing season 2016/17. The light curves include data recorded with VERITAS (first / top panel), MAGIC [MAGIC Collaboration et al. 2018] (second panel), Fermi-LAT (third panel), Swift-XRT (fourth panel), Swift-UVOT (fifth panel), Tuorla [MAGIC Collaboration et al. 2018] (sixth panel), Steward Optical Polarization percentage and Posi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Top panel: long-term VERITAS TeV light curve for all 4-telescope observations of radio galaxy NGC 1275 for the energy range 0.15 TeV ⩽ E ⩽ 30 TeV, spanning more than 8-years (2009-2017) and binned in 28-day intervals. The median flux (solid orange line) and 1σ root mean squared deviation (RMSD; orange band) are shown, with 95% confidence-level upper limits plotted for flux points < 2σ. Center panel: averag… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The spectra calculated for the average low￾state (open blue circles), the average high-state (open orange squares) and for the extreme-high-state flares that occurred on MJD57755 (green-filled circles) and MJD57756 (purple￾filled squares). For each of these states, the VHE γ-ray emis￾sion falls according to a power law spectrum. As NGC 1275 increases in flux brightness the spectral indices get harder and d… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The Fermi-LAT NGC 1275 flux versus time for the period MJD 57753 – MJD 57760 spanning the 2017 flare detected at VHE energies. The orange points show the 12- hour binned light curve data and the solid blue line the mean flux for optimal Bayesian block binning including uncertainty (blue shaded band). For reference we also show a constant model (dashed green line) fitted to the data including the 68% confid… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Shown here are the best fitted spectral models (including residuals) to the combined Fermi-LAT (blue filled circles) and MAGIC (brown filled circles) data for 2016 De￾cember 31/2017 January 1 (top panel), and the combined Fermi-LAT (blue filled circles) and VERITAS (orange filled squares) data for 2017 January 2 (bottom panel). Also shown in the top panel is the best-fitted spectral model (brown dashed lin… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Geometrical scheme of radiative components con￾sidered for the broadband SED modeling of NGC 1275 (not to scale). The red-dashed lines represent the multiple radia￾tive transfers taken into account. In our code, the accretion disk is considered as a point-like source. With 5.4pc as the deprojected distance to the middle of C3, we take 4.7pc as the deprojected distance to the edge of C3. versial and can sig… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Multiwavelength SEDs with models and residuals of NGC 1275 during the 2017 VHE flare (left) and one day after (right). Gray lines are for components considered steady over the two days: the C3 synchrotron and SSC emission (dashed), and the thermal emission from the accretion disk (dotted). These two components are fitted by eye and constrained from optical and radio data. Colored lines are linked to the bl… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Corner plots of the posterior distribution of the free parameters in the SED model fit of 2016 December 31/2017 January 1 (top panel) and 2017 January 2 (bottom panel) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The radio galaxy NGC 1275 is the Brightest Cluster Galaxy in the Perseus cluster. It is well-studied across all wavebands, including Very High Energy (VHE; E>100GeV gamma-rays, and with radio observations over the last 20 years tracking an unusual radio component, "C3". NGC 1275 was observed in an exceptional VHE flaring state between 2016 December 31 and 2017 January 3. The flare peak reached ~1.5 Crab units as measured by the MAGIC observatory. We report on the observations of NGC~1275 conducted by VERITAS and multi-wavelength data collected during this flaring state, and for context, data taken between 2009 and 2017 inclusive. VERITAS detected the declining state of the flare on 2017 January 2 (MJD 57755) and 3 (MJD 57756) at an average flux state of 0.5 Crab units. VERITAS spectra show an overall long-term trend of harder-when-brighter. During the flare, the gamma-ray spectrum obtained from the combined Fermi-LAT, MAGIC, and VERITAS observations, changes from a power law with an exponential cut-off on January 1 to a log-parabola on January 2. To study the evolution of the flare in more detail, multi-band spectral energy distributions (SEDs) were constructed for the nights of 2017 January 1 and 2 corresponding to the shift from the peak to the decline of the flare. A blob-in-jet modeling of the SEDs results in support for a two-component model with a jet angle of 10 degrees to the line of sight and the gamma-ray emission zone located in the vicinity of the C3 radio component.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports VERITAS detections of NGC 1275 in the declining phase of its 2017 VHE flare (0.5 Crab on MJD 57755-57756), together with Fermi-LAT, MAGIC, and multiwavelength data from 2009-2017. It documents a harder-when-brighter spectral trend and a change from power-law-with-cutoff to log-parabola between January 1 and 2. Blob-in-jet modeling of the two-night SEDs is used to argue for a two-component jet with a 10° viewing angle and gamma-ray emission zone near radio component C3.

Significance. If the modeling conclusions are robust, the work supplies new constraints on jet geometry and emission location during a rare high-state episode in a nearby radio galaxy, complementing long-term monitoring and aiding interpretation of VHE emission mechanisms in misaligned AGN.

major comments (1)
  1. [SED modeling and discussion sections] The central claim that blob-in-jet modeling supports a two-component solution with 10° jet angle and emission near C3 is load-bearing for the geometric inferences. The manuscript does not present quantitative comparisons showing that a single-component leptonic model or a model including external Compton scattering on cluster photons yields significantly worse fits to the January 1 and 2 SEDs; without such tests the specific parameter values remain model-dependent rather than data-driven.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the modeling 'results in support for a two-component model' but does not quote any fit statistic or parameter uncertainties; adding a brief quantitative statement would improve clarity.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the SED plots should explicitly identify which data points and model curves correspond to the two blobs and to the radio, X-ray, and VHE bands.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We appreciate the emphasis on strengthening the robustness of the modeling conclusions and address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [SED modeling and discussion sections] The central claim that blob-in-jet modeling supports a two-component solution with 10° jet angle and emission near C3 is load-bearing for the geometric inferences. The manuscript does not present quantitative comparisons showing that a single-component leptonic model or a model including external Compton scattering on cluster photons yields significantly worse fits to the January 1 and 2 SEDs; without such tests the specific parameter values remain model-dependent rather than data-driven.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative comparisons to alternative models would strengthen the presentation and make the geometric inferences more data-driven. The two-component model was selected because it is directly motivated by the VLBI radio monitoring, which shows the C3 component brightening in temporal coincidence with the VHE flare; a single-zone model cannot simultaneously reproduce the observed radio core flux and the VHE spectrum without extreme Doppler factors or magnetic-field values inconsistent with the radio data. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix or expanded modeling subsection that reports chi-squared or likelihood comparisons for a single-zone leptonic model applied to the same January 1 and 2 SEDs, demonstrating that it fails to fit the radio-to-VHE broadband shape. We will also discuss external Compton scattering on the Perseus cluster photon field, showing that the required target-photon energy density exceeds the observed intracluster medium values and does not improve the fit; these results will be summarized in the discussion section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard SED model fitting to data

full rationale

The paper reports VERITAS and multiwavelength observations of the NGC 1275 flare and constructs SEDs for January 1 and 2. It then states that 'A blob-in-jet modeling of the SEDs results in support for a two-component model with a jet angle of 10 degrees to the line of sight and the gamma-ray emission zone located in the vicinity of the C3 radio component.' This is an explicit description of fitting a leptonic blob-in-jet model to the observed radio-to-VHE data to obtain best-fit parameters. No derivation chain is claimed that reduces by construction to its own inputs, no equations are presented that equate a 'prediction' to a fitted quantity, and no self-citation load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are invoked in the abstract or provided text. The two-component assumption is presented as a modeling choice whose sufficiency can be tested against the data or alternative models. The result is therefore self-contained parameter estimation rather than circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the blob-in-jet model and the fitted parameters that locate the emission zone near C3.

free parameters (1)
  • jet viewing angle = 10 degrees
    Fitted value of 10 degrees chosen to reproduce the observed SED shapes on January 1 and 2.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Blob-in-jet model with two components adequately represents the emission physics of NGC 1275 during the flare
    Invoked when constructing and fitting the SEDs for the two nights of the flare.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6241 in / 1555 out tokens · 64821 ms · 2026-05-20T03:25:48.465112+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2020, ApJS, 247, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bcb

    Abdollahi, S., Acero, F., Ackermann, M., et al. 2020, ApJS, 247, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bcb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bcb 2020

  2. [2]

    U., Benbow, W., Bird, R., et al

    Abeysekara, A. U., Benbow, W., Bird, R., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab35c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab35c 2018

  3. [3]

    2012, ApJ, 746, 151, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/151

    Abramowski, A., Acero, F., Aharonian, F., et al. 2012, ApJ, 746, 151, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/151

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/746/2/151 2012

  4. [4]

    A., Beilicke, M., Blaylock, G., et al

    Acciari, V. A., Beilicke, M., Blaylock, G., et al. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 679, 397, doi: 10.1086/587458 20

    work page doi:10.1086/587458 2008

  5. [5]

    A., Beilicke, M., Blaylock, G., et al

    Acciari, V. A., Beilicke, M., Blaylock, G., et al. 2008, ApJ, 679, 1427, doi: 10.1086/587736

    work page doi:10.1086/587736 2008

  6. [6]

    A., Aliu, E., Arlen, T., et al

    Acciari, V. A., Aliu, E., Arlen, T., et al. 2010, ApJ, 716, 819, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/819

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/1/819 2010

  7. [7]

    2004, A&A, 421, 529, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035764

    Aharonian, F., Akhperjanian, A., Beilicke, M., et al. 2004, A&A, 421, 529, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035764

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035764 2004

  8. [8]

    G., Bazer-Bachi, A

    Aharonian, F., Akhperjanian, A. G., Bazer-Bachi, A. R., et al. 2006, Science, 314, 1424, doi: 10.1126/science.1134408

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1134408 2006

  9. [9]

    G., Anton, G., et al

    Aharonian, F., Akhperjanian, A. G., Anton, G., et al. 2009, ApJL, 695, L40, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/L40

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/695/1/l40 2009

  10. [10]

    L., Ansoldi, S., Antonelli, L

    Ahnen, M. L., Ansoldi, S., Antonelli, L. A., et al. 2016, A&A, 589, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527846 Aleksi´ c, J., Antonelli, L. A., Antoranz, P., et al. 2010, ApJL, 723, L207, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/723/2/L207 Aleksi´ c, J., Alvarez, E. A., Antonelli, L. A., et al. 2012, A&A, 539, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118668 Aleksi´ c, J., Ansoldi, S., Ant...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527846 2016

  11. [11]

    2012, ApJ, 746, 141, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/141

    Aliu, E., Arlen, T., Aune, T., et al. 2012, ApJ, 746, 141, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/141

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/746/2/141 2012

  12. [12]

    2020, ApJ, 896, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab910e

    Archer, A., Benbow, W., Bird, R., et al. 2020, ApJ, 896, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab910e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab910e 2020

  13. [13]

    B., Abdo, A

    Atwood, W. B., Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1071, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/1071 2009

  14. [14]

    2015, in International Cosmic Ray Conference, Vol

    Benbow, W., & VERITAS Collaboration. 2015, in International Cosmic Ray Conference, Vol. 34, 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2015), 821

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    L., Larson, D., Weiland, J

    Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiland, J. L., & Hinshaw, G. 2014, ApJ, 794, 135, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/135

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/794/2/135 2014

  16. [16]

    2007, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 466, 1219, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066674

    Berge, D., Funk, S., & Hinton, J. 2007, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 466, 1219, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066674

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066674 2007

  17. [17]

    A., Sparks, W

    Biretta, J. A., Sparks, W. B., & Macchetto, F. 1999, ApJ, 520, 621, doi: 10.1086/307499

    work page doi:10.1086/307499 1999

  18. [18]

    A., Landsman, W., Holland, S

    Breeveld, A. A., Landsman, W., Holland, S. T., et al. 2011, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1358, American Institute of Physics Conference Series, ed. J. E. McEnery, J. L. Racusin, & N. Gehrels, 373–376

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    P., Anderson, D

    Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., & Huyvaert, K. P. 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 23, doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6 2011

  20. [20]

    The Swift X-ray Telescope

    Burrows, D. N., Hill, J. E., Nousek, J. A., et al. 2005, SSRv, 120, 165, doi: 10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2 2005

  21. [21]

    C., Harris, D

    Cheung, C. C., Harris, D. E., & Stawarz, /suppress L. 2007, ApJL, 663, L65, doi: 10.1086/520510

    work page doi:10.1086/520510 2007

  22. [22]

    2008, in International Cosmic Ray Conference, Vol

    Cogan, P. 2008, in International Cosmic Ray Conference, Vol. 3, International Cosmic Ray Conference, 1385–1388 de Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs, A., Corwin, Herold G., J., et al. 1991, Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies

    work page 2008

  23. [23]

    D., & Giebels, B

    Dermer, C. D., & Giebels, B. 2016, Comptes Rendus Physique, 17, 594, doi: 10.1016/j.crhy.2016.04.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2016.04.004 2016

  24. [24]

    PEGASE.2, a metallicity-consistent spectral evolution model of galaxies: the documentation and the code

    Fioc, M., & Rocca-Volmerange, B. 1999, arXiv e-prints, astro. https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9912179

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  25. [25]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63, doi: 10.1086/316293

    work page doi:10.1086/316293 1999

  26. [26]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  27. [27]

    2017, A&A, 603, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629684

    Franceschini, A., & Rodighiero, G. 2017, A&A, 603, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629684

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629684 2017

  28. [28]

    2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 465, L94, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slw217

    Fujita, Y., & Nagai, H. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 465, L94, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slw217

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slw217 2016

  29. [29]

    2003, ApJL, 594, L27, doi: 10.1086/378557

    Georganopoulos, M., & Kazanas, D. 2003, ApJL, 594, L27, doi: 10.1086/378557

    work page doi:10.1086/378557 2003

  30. [30]

    1993, ApJ, 407, 65, doi: 10.1086/172493

    Ghisellini, G., Padovani, P., Celotti, A., & Maraschi, L. 1993, ApJ, 407, 65, doi: 10.1086/172493

    work page doi:10.1086/172493 1993

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Ghisellini, G., & Tavecchio, F. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 985, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15007.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15007.x 2009

  32. [32]

    2005a, A&A, 432, 401, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041404 —

    Ghisellini, G., Tavecchio, F., & Chiaberge, M. 2005a, A&A, 432, 401, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041404 —. 2005b, A&A, 432, 401, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041404

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041404

  33. [33]

    2001, ApJ, 552, 508, doi: 10.1086/320581

    Venturi, T. 2001, ApJ, 552, 508, doi: 10.1086/320581

    work page doi:10.1086/320581 2001

  34. [34]

    2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 472, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0431-2 H

    Giovannini, G., Savolainen, T., Orienti, M., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 472, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0431-2 H. E. S. S. Collaboration, Aharonian, F., Ait Benkhali, F., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348063

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0431-2 2018

  35. [35]

    E., Cheung, C

    Harris, D. E., Cheung, C. C., Stawarz, L., et al. 2008, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 386, Extragalactic Jets: Theory and Observation from Radio to Gamma Ray, ed. T. A. Rector & D. S. De Young, 80

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    2015, A&A, 578, A69, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425330 —

    Hervet, O., Boisson, C., & Sol, H. 2015, A&A, 578, A69, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425330 —. 2016, A&A, 592, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628117

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425330 2015

  37. [37]

    A., & Youngquist, A

    Hervet, O., Johnson, C. A., & Youngquist, A. 2024, ApJ, 962, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09c0 HESS Collaboration, Abdalla, H., Abramowski, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 4187, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty439

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad09c0 2024

  38. [38]

    Hillas, A. M. 1985, in International Cosmic Ray

    work page 1985

  39. [39]

    2011, International Cosmic Ray Conference, 12, 137, doi: 10.7529/ICRC2011/V12/H11

    Holder, J. 2011, International Cosmic Ray Conference, 12, 137, doi: 10.7529/ICRC2011/V12/H11

    work page doi:10.7529/icrc2011/v12/h11 2011

  40. [40]

    2009, A&A, 494, 527, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811150

    Hovatta, T., Valtaoja, E., Tornikoski, M., & L¨ ahteenm¨ aki, A. 2009, A&A, 494, 527, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811150

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811150 2009

  41. [41]

    G., Marscher, A

    Jorstad, S. G., Marscher, A. P., Morozova, D. A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 846, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8407

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8407 2017

  42. [42]

    2012, A&A, 538, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118212

    Kadler, M., Eisenacher, D., Ros, E., et al. 2012, A&A, 538, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118212

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118212 2012

  43. [43]

    2018, ApJ, 864, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad6e3

    Kino, M., Wajima, K., Kawakatu, N., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad6e3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad6e3 2018

  44. [44]

    2021, ApJL, 920, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac24fa

    Kino, M., Niinuma, K., Kawakatu, N., et al. 2021, ApJL, 920, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac24fa

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac24fa 2021

  45. [45]

    Komissarov, S. S. 1990, Soviet Astronomy Letters, 16, 284

    work page 1990

  46. [46]

    A., & Bridle, A

    Laing, R. A., & Bridle, A. H. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 3405, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2138

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2138 2014

  47. [47]

    1983, ApJ, 272, 317, doi: 10.1086/161295

    Li, T.-P., & Ma, Y.-Q. 1983, ApJ, 272, 317, doi: 10.1086/161295

    work page doi:10.1086/161295 1983

  48. [48]

    G., et al

    Lico, R., Casadio, C., Jorstad, S. G., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, L10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142948

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142948 2022

  49. [49]

    C., Bertsch, D

    Lin, Y. C., Bertsch, D. L., Dingus, B. L., et al. 1993, ApJL, 416, L53, doi: 10.1086/187069

    work page doi:10.1086/187069 1993

  50. [50]

    L., Aller, M

    Lister, M. L., Aller, M. F., Aller, H. D., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa9c44

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa9c44 2018

  51. [51]

    L., Cohen, M

    Lister, M. L., Cohen, M. H., Homan, D. C., et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 1874, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/6/1874

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/138/6/1874 2009

  52. [52]

    L., Homan, D

    Lister, M. L., Homan, D. C., Hovatta, T., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab08ee MAGIC Collaboration, Ansoldi, S., Antonelli, L. A., et al. 2018, A&A, 617, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832895

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab08ee 2019

  53. [53]

    2017, Proceedings of 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2017), 747, doi: 10.22323/1.301.0747

    Maier, G., & Holder, J. 2017, Proceedings of 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2017), 747, doi: 10.22323/1.301.0747

    work page doi:10.22323/1.301.0747 2017

  54. [54]

    P., Jorstad, S

    Marscher, A. P., Jorstad, S. G., Larionov, V. M., et al. 2010, ApJL, 710, L126, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/710/2/L126

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/710/2/l126 2010

  55. [55]

    G., Faltenbacher, A., & Brighenti, F

    Mathews, W. G., Faltenbacher, A., & Brighenti, F. 2006, ApJ, 638, 659, doi: 10.1086/499119

    work page doi:10.1086/499119 2006

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Mattox, J. R., Bertsch, D. L., Chiang, J., et al. 1996, ApJ, 461, 396, doi: 10.1086/177068

    work page doi:10.1086/177068 1996

  57. [57]

    2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Golap, K. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ed. R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, & D. J. Bell, 127

    work page 2007

  58. [58]

    T., Georganopoulos, M., Sparks, W

    Meyer, E. T., Georganopoulos, M., Sparks, W. B., et al. 2015, Nature, 521, 495, doi: 10.1038/nature14481

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14481 2015

  59. [59]

    2016, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9689, 1 —

    Mirzoyan, R. 2016, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9689, 1 —. 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9929, 1

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    2016, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9690, 1

    Mukherjee, R., & VERITAS Collaboration. 2016, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9690, 1

    work page 2016

  61. [61]

    2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9931, 1

    Mukherjee, R., & VERITAS Collaboration. 2017, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 9931, 1

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    2017, ApJ, 849, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8e43

    Nagai, H., Fujita, Y., Nakamura, M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8e43

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8e43 2017

  63. [63]

    2010, PASJ, 62, L11, doi: 10.1093/pasj/62.2.L11

    Nagai, H., Suzuki, K., Asada, K., et al. 2010, PASJ, 62, L11, doi: 10.1093/pasj/62.2.L11

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/62.2.l11 2010

  64. [64]

    2014, ApJ, 785, 53, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/53

    Nagai, H., Haga, T., Giovannini, G., et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, 53, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/53

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/785/1/53 2014

  65. [65]

    F., Mpisketzis, V., Kim, J

    Paraschos, G. F., Mpisketzis, V., Kim, J. Y., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A32, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244814

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244814 2023

  66. [66]

    H., Joy, M., Luginbuhl, C

    Prestwich, A. H., Joy, M., Luginbuhl, C. B., Sulkanen, M., & Newberry, M. 1997, ApJ, 477, 144, doi: 10.1086/303693

    work page doi:10.1086/303693 1997

  67. [67]

    A., Connors, A., Kashyap, V

    Protassov, R., van Dyk, D. A., Connors, A., Kashyap, V. L., & Siemiginowska, A. 2002, ApJ, 571, 545, doi: 10.1086/339856

    work page doi:10.1086/339856 2002

  68. [68]

    Rieger, F. M. 2017, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1792, 6th International Symposium on High Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy, 020008

    work page 2017

  69. [69]

    M., & Duffy, P

    Rieger, F. M., & Duffy, P. 2004, ApJ, 617, 155, doi: 10.1086/425167

    work page doi:10.1086/425167 2004

  70. [70]

    2022, Galaxies, 10, 61, doi: 10.3390/galaxies10030061

    Rulten, C. 2022, Galaxies, 10, 61, doi: 10.3390/galaxies10030061

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies10030061 2022

  71. [71]

    D., Norris, J

    Scargle, J. D., Norris, J. P., Jackson, B., & Chiang, J. 2013, ApJ, 764, 167, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/167

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/764/2/167 2013

  72. [72]

    Measuring Reddening with SDSS Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/103 2011

  73. [73]

    D., Stockman, H

    Schmidt, G. D., Stockman, H. S., & Smith, P. S. 1992, ApJL, 398, L57, doi: 10.1086/186576

    work page doi:10.1086/186576 1992

  74. [74]

    Sikora, M., Rutkowski, M., & Begelman, M. C. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 1352, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw107

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw107 2016

  75. [75]

    Madejski, G. M. 2009, ApJ, 704, 38, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/38 Stawarz, /suppress L., & Ostrowski, M. 2002, ApJ, 578, 763, doi: 10.1086/342649

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/704/1/38 2009

  76. [76]

    , keywords =

    Tavecchio, F., & Ghisellini, G. 2008, MNRAS, 385, L98, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00441.x —. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1224, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1196 The VERITAS Collaboration, the VLBA 43 GHz M87 Monitoring Team, the H.E.S.S. Collaboration, et al. 2009, Science, 325, 444, doi: 10.1126/science.1175406

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00441.x 2008

  77. [77]

    M., & Padovani, P

    Urry, C. M., & Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803, doi: 10.1086/133630

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/133630 1995

  78. [78]

    2004, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 192, doi: 10.3758/BF03206482

    Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Farrell, S. 2004, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 192, doi: 10.3758/BF03206482

    work page doi:10.3758/bf03206482 2004

  79. [79]

    P., & Horan, D

    Wakely, S. P., & Horan, D. 2008, International Cosmic Ray Conference, 3, 1341

    work page 2008

  80. [80]

    C., Romney, J

    Walker, R. C., Romney, J. D., & Benson, J. M. 1994, ApJL, 430, L45, doi: 10.1086/187434 22

    work page doi:10.1086/187434 1994

Showing first 80 references.