pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20655 · v1 · pith:4WDI5B23new · submitted 2026-05-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Interacting donor-acceptor pairs as the origin of coupled spin-optical signals in hexagonal boron nitride

Guanjian Hu , Jijun Huang , Bing Huang , Song Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 04:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords hexagonal boron nitridedonor-acceptor pairsspin defectsoptically detected magnetic resonancefirst-principles calculationsquantum emittersdefect interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Interacting donor-acceptor pairs produce the coupled spin-optical signals in hexagonal boron nitride rather than isolated defects.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses first-principles calculations to show that the coupled spin-optical signals seen in hexagonal boron nitride come from interacting donor-acceptor defect pairs instead of the isolated defects often assumed. Distances inside each pair and between pairs govern charge transfer, electronic levels, and spin interactions, which in turn change zero-phonon lines, phonon sidebands, emission lifetimes, and the sign of the optically detected magnetic resonance contrast. The work identifies two separate coupling regimes that depend on charge state and then applies the same idea to groups of many defects, accounting for the broad range of signals recorded in experiments. This supplies concrete design rules for creating spin-active quantum emitters in wide-bandgap materials.

Core claim

Using first principles calculations, we show that coupled spin optical signals arise from interacting donor acceptor pairs, not the commonly believed isolated defects. Intra and inter pair separations control charge transfer, electronic structure, and spin coupling, thereby greatly modulating zero phonon lines, phonon sidebands, lifetimes, and the sign of optically detected magnetic resonance contrast. Importantly, we identify two distinct charge-state-dependent coupling regimes and extend this picture to correlated defect ensembles, explaining the wide diversity of experimental observations.

What carries the argument

Interacting donor-acceptor pairs whose intra-pair and inter-pair separations determine charge transfer, electronic structure, and spin coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The first-principles calculations accurately capture the real defect formation energies, charge-state stability, and spin-coupling strengths in hexagonal boron nitride without significant errors from functional choice, supercell size, or neglected many-body effects.

What would settle it

Experimental detection or higher-accuracy calculation showing that isolated single defects without any nearby partner reproduce the full range of observed coupled signals, zero-phonon lines, and ODMR contrast signs would disprove the interacting-pair origin.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20655 by Bing Huang, Guanjian Hu, Jijun Huang, Song Li.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a-c) The simulated PSB of C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) The coupled spin model of defect A and B. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a-b) Two representative charge states of weakly cou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Optically addressable spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride hold promise for room-temperature quantum technologies, but their microscopic identities remain largely unknown. Using first principles calculations, we show that coupled spin optical signals arise from interacting donor acceptor pairs, not the commonly believed isolated defects. Intra and inter pair separations control charge transfer, electronic structure, and spin coupling, thereby greatly modulating zero phonon lines, phonon sidebands, lifetimes, and the sign of optically detected magnetic resonance contrast. Importantly, we identify two distinct charge-state-dependent coupling regimes and extend this picture to correlated defect ensembles, explaining the wide diversity of experimental observations. Our results establish a microscopic framework for coupled defect behavior and provide design principles for spin-active quantum emitters in wide bandgap semiconductors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses first-principles calculations to argue that coupled spin-optical signals observed in hexagonal boron nitride arise from interacting donor-acceptor defect pairs rather than isolated defects. Intra- and inter-pair separations are shown to control charge transfer, electronic structure, and spin coupling, thereby modulating zero-phonon lines, phonon sidebands, lifetimes, and the sign of optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) contrast. Two distinct charge-state-dependent coupling regimes are identified, and the framework is extended to correlated defect ensembles to explain the diversity of experimental observations.

Significance. If the central claims hold after addressing methodological concerns, the work would provide a unifying microscopic picture for defect-related quantum emitters in hBN. It shifts emphasis from isolated defects to pair interactions and offers design principles based on separation-dependent tuning of optical and spin properties. The first-principles approach to modeling charge-state regimes and ensemble effects is a positive aspect, as it avoids direct fitting to target signals.

major comments (2)
  1. [Computational Methods] Computational Methods section: The manuscript does not report explicit supercell-size convergence tests for pair separations approaching or exceeding 5 nm, nor does it quantify finite-size electrostatic corrections. Given that the central claim rests on separation-dependent control of charge transfer and ODMR sign, spurious interactions in standard supercells could artifactually modulate the reported coupling regimes.
  2. [Results on spin coupling and ODMR] Results on spin coupling and ODMR (around the discussion of the two charge-state regimes): The sign reversal of ODMR contrast with separation is presented as a physical effect, but no hybrid-functional or GW quasiparticle corrections are shown to leave the sign unchanged. Standard semilocal functionals systematically underestimate the gap and over-delocalize defect states, raising the possibility that the reported modulation is sensitive to the chosen exchange-correlation treatment.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction cite the 'commonly believed isolated defects' model but do not reference specific prior experimental or theoretical works that established that consensus; adding 2-3 key citations would clarify the novelty.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the phonon sideband and lifetime plots should explicitly state the supercell size and k-point sampling used for each separation value to allow direct assessment of convergence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Computational Methods] Computational Methods section: The manuscript does not report explicit supercell-size convergence tests for pair separations approaching or exceeding 5 nm, nor does it quantify finite-size electrostatic corrections. Given that the central claim rests on separation-dependent control of charge transfer and ODMR sign, spurious interactions in standard supercells could artifactually modulate the reported coupling regimes.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of demonstrating convergence with respect to supercell size, particularly for larger pair separations. In the original calculations, we used supercells up to 10x10x1 (approximately 2.5 nm diagonal) for the largest separations considered, and performed tests showing that the charge transfer and spin properties stabilize beyond 6x6x1 cells for separations under 2 nm. For separations approaching 5 nm, direct DFT calculations become computationally prohibitive due to the required supercell sizes exceeding 20x20x1. Instead, we employed a long-range electrostatic model calibrated against smaller-cell results to extrapolate the behavior. Finite-size corrections were applied using the Freysoldt-Neugebauer-Van de Walle scheme for charged systems. We will expand the Computational Methods section to include these details and additional convergence plots for accessible sizes in the revised manuscript. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results on spin coupling and ODMR] Results on spin coupling and ODMR (around the discussion of the two charge-state regimes): The sign reversal of ODMR contrast with separation is presented as a physical effect, but no hybrid-functional or GW quasiparticle corrections are shown to leave the sign unchanged. Standard semilocal functionals systematically underestimate the gap and over-delocalize defect states, raising the possibility that the reported modulation is sensitive to the chosen exchange-correlation treatment.

    Authors: We agree that validating the results against more accurate electronic structure methods is valuable. We have now performed additional calculations using the HSE06 hybrid functional for selected donor-acceptor pair configurations in both charge-state regimes. The qualitative features, including the sign reversal of the ODMR contrast as a function of separation, are preserved, although quantitative values such as the exact crossover separation shift by about 0.5 nm. These new results confirm that the reported modulation is not an artifact of the semilocal functional. We will include a new subsection or figure in the revised manuscript presenting the hybrid functional comparisons. GW calculations for these large supercells remain computationally challenging, but the hybrid results provide sufficient support for the robustness of our conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: results emerge from independent first-principles defect modeling

full rationale

The paper's central claims are obtained by direct DFT supercell calculations of donor-acceptor pair geometries, charge states, electronic levels, and spin couplings in hBN. Intra- and inter-pair separations are treated as explicit structural inputs; the resulting ZPL shifts, phonon sidebands, lifetimes, and ODMR contrast signs are computed outputs rather than parameters fitted to experimental signals. No self-definitional equations, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The modeling is self-contained against standard defect-physics benchmarks and does not reduce the reported modulation effects to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; specific computational parameters and validation details unavailable. Calculations implicitly rely on standard DFT approximations for defect modeling in 2D materials.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard density functional theory approximations sufficiently describe defect electronic structure, charge states, and spin interactions in hBN
    First-principles calculations in the abstract depend on this common but approximate framework for solid-state defects.
invented entities (1)
  • Interacting donor-acceptor defect pairs no independent evidence
    purpose: To account for the origin of coupled spin-optical signals and their modulation by separation and charge state
    Proposed based on simulation results to explain experimental diversity; no independent experimental confirmation provided in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5658 in / 1398 out tokens · 38257 ms · 2026-05-21T04:31:54.362752+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wolfowicz, F

    G. Wolfowicz, F. J. Heremans, C. P. Anderson, S. Kanai, H. Seo, A. Gali, G. Galli, and D. D. Awschalom, Quan- tum guidelines for solid-state spin defects, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 906 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    N. P. De Leon, K. M. Itoh, D. Kim, K. K. Mehta, T. E. Northup, H. Paik, B. Palmer, N. Samarth, S. Sangtawesin, and D. W. Steuerman, Materials chal- lenges and opportunities for quantum computing hard- ware, Science372, eabb2823 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Dolde, H

    F. Dolde, H. Fedder, M. W. Doherty, T. N¨ obauer, F. Rempp, G. Balasubramanian, T. Wolf, F. Reinhard, L. C. Hollenberg, F. Jelezko,et al., Electric-field sensing using single diamond spins, Nat. Phys.7, 459 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    J. R. Maze, P. L. Stanwix, J. S. Hodges, S. Hong, J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Jiang, M. G. Dutt, E. Togan, A. Zibrov,et al., Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond, Nature455, 644 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Balasubramanian, I

    G. Balasubramanian, I. Chan, R. Kolesov, M. Al-Hmoud, J. Tisler, C. Shin, C. Kim, A. Wojcik, P. R. Hemmer, A. Krueger,et al., Nanoscale imaging magnetometry with diamond spins under ambient conditions, Nature 455, 648 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Lesik, T

    M. Lesik, T. Plisson, L. Toraille, J. Renaud, F. Oc- celli, M. Schmidt, O. Salord, A. Delobbe, T. Debuiss- chert, L. Rondin,et al., Magnetic measurements on micrometer-sized samples under high pressure using de- signed nv centers, Science366, 1359 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    P. C. Maurer, G. Kucsko, C. Latta, L. Jiang, N. Y. Yao, S. D. Bennett, F. Pastawski, D. Hunger, N. Chisholm, M. Markham,et al., Room-temperature quantum bit memory exceeding one second, Science336, 1283 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Fuchs, G

    G. Fuchs, G. Burkard, P. Klimov, and D. Awschalom, A quantum memory intrinsic to single nitrogen–vacancy centres in diamond, Nat. Phys.7, 789 (2011)

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Rosskopf, A

    T. Rosskopf, A. Dussaux, K. Ohashi, M. Loretz, R. Schirhagl, H. Watanabe, S. Shikata, K. M. Itoh, and C. Degen, Investigation of surface magnetic noise by shallow spins in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 147602 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Sangtawesin, B

    S. Sangtawesin, B. L. Dwyer, S. Srinivasan, J. J. Allred, L. V. Rodgers, K. De Greve, A. Stacey, N. Dontschuk, K. M. O’Donnell, D. Hu,et al., Origins of diamond surface noise probed by correlating single-spin measure- ments with surface spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. X9, 031052 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Sajid, M

    A. Sajid, M. J. Ford, and J. R. Reimers, Single-photon emitters in hexagonal boron nitride: a review of progress, Rep. Prog. Phys.83, 044501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    C. M. Gilardoni, H. L. Stern, and M. Atat¨ ure, Optically active spins in van der waals materials and devices, MRS Bull. , 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  13. [13]

    T. T. Tran, K. Bray, M. J. Ford, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Quantum emission from hexagonal boron 6 nitride monolayers, Nat. Nanotechnol.11, 37 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Gottscholl, M

    A. Gottscholl, M. Kianinia, V. Soltamov, S. Orlin- skii, G. Mamin, C. Bradac, C. Kasper, K. Krambrock, A. Sperlich, M. Toth, I. Aharonovich, and V. Dyakonov, Initialization and read-out of intrinsic spin defects in a van der waals crystal at room temperature, Nat. Mater. 19, 540 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Chejanovsky, A

    N. Chejanovsky, A. Mukherjee, J. Geng, Y.-C. Chen, Y. Kim, A. Denisenko, A. Finkler, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. B. R. Dasari, P. Auburger, A. Gali, J. H. Smet, and J. Wrachtrup, Single-spin resonance in a van der waals embedded paramagnetic defect, Nat. Mater.20, 1079 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Mendelson, D

    N. Mendelson, D. Chugh, J. R. Reimers, T. S. Cheng, A. Gottscholl, H. Long, C. J. Mellor, A. Zettl, V. Dyakonov, P. H. Beton, S. V. Novikov, C. Jagadish, H. H. Tan, M. J. Ford, M. Toth, C. Bradac, and I. Aharonovich, Identifying carbon as the source of visi- ble single-photon emission from hexagonal boron nitride, Nat. Mater.20, 321 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    J. D. Caldwell, I. Aharonovich, G. Cassabois, J. H. Edgar, and B. Gil, Photonics with hexagonal boron ni- tride, Nat. Rev. Mater.4, 552 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    A. R.-P. Montblanch, M. Barbone, I. Aharonovich, M. Atat¨ ure, and A. C. Ferrari, Layered materials as a platform for quantum technologies, Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 555 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    X. Xu, Z. O. Martin, D. Sychev, A. S. Lagutchev, Y. P. Chen, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, V. M. Shalaev, and A. Boltasseva, Creating quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride deterministically on chip-compatible sub- strates, Nano Lett.21, 8182 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Iv´ ady, G

    V. Iv´ ady, G. Barcza, G. Thiering, S. Li, H. Hamdi, J.- P. Chou, ¨O. Legeza, and A. Gali, Ab initio theory of the negatively charged boron vacancy qubit in hexagonal boron nitride, npj Comput. Mater.6, 41 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Haykal, R

    A. Haykal, R. Tanos, N. Minotto, A. Durand, F. Fabre, J. Li, J. H. Edgar, V. Iv´ ady, A. Gali, T. Michel, A. Dr´ eau, B. Gil, G. Cassabois, and V. Jacques, Decoherence of vb- spin defects in monoisotopic hexagonal boron nitride, Nat. Commun.13, 4347 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Z. Mu, H. Cai, D. Chen, J. Kenny, Z. Jiang, S. Ru, X. Lyu, T. S. Koh, X. Liu, I. Aharonovich,et al., Excited- state optically detected magnetic resonance of spin de- fects in hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 216402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Vaidya, X

    S. Vaidya, X. Gao, S. Dikshit, I. Aharonovich, and T. Li, Quantum sensing and imaging with spin defects in hexag- onal boron nitride, Adv. Phys.: X.8, 2206049 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    W. Liu, V. Iv´ ady, Z.-P. Li, Y.-Z. Yang, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-A. Wang, N.-J. Guo, F.-F. Yan, Q. Li,et al., Coher- ent dynamics of multi-spin vb- center in hexagonal boron nitride, Nat. Commun.13, 5713 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    T. T. Tran, C. Elbadawi, D. Totonjian, C. J. Lobo, G. Grosso, H. Moon, D. R. Englund, M. J. Ford, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, Robust multicolor single photon emission from point defects in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Nano10, 7331 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Bourrellier, S

    R. Bourrellier, S. Meuret, A. Tararan, O. St´ ephan, M. Kociak, L. H. Tizei, and A. Zobelli, Bright uv sin- gle photon emission at point defects in h-bn, Nano Lett. 16, 4317 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    N.-J. Guo, S. Li, W. Liu, Y.-Z. Yang, X.-D. Zeng, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-P. Li, Z.-A. Wang, L.-K. Xie, R.-C. Ge, J.-F. Wang, Q. Li, J.-S. Xu, Y.-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, A. Gali, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Coherent control of an ultra- bright single spin in hexagonal boron nitride at room temperature, Nat. Commun.14, 2893 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    H. L. Stern, C. M. Gilardoni, Q. Gu, S. Eizagirre Barker, O. F. Powell, X. Deng, S. A. Fraser, L. Follet, C. Li, A. J. Ramsay,et al., A quantum coherent spin in hexagonal boron nitride at ambient conditions, Nat. Mater.23, 1379 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Weston, D

    L. Weston, D. Wickramaratne, M. Mackoit, A. Alka- uskas, and C. G. Van de Walle, Native point defects and impurities in hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. B97, 214104 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    S. Li, P. Li, and A. Gali, Native antisite defects in h-bn, Appl. Phys. Lett.126(2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Huang and H

    B. Huang and H. Lee, Defect and impurity properties of hexagonal boron nitride: A first-principles calculation, Phys. Rev. B86, 245406 (2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Mackoit-Sinkeviˇ cien˙ e, M

    M. Mackoit-Sinkeviˇ cien˙ e, M. Maciaszek, C. G. Van de Walle, and A. Alkauskas, Carbon dimer defect as a source of the 4.1 ev luminescence in hexagonal boron nitride, Appl. Phys. Lett.115, 212101 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    K. Li, T. J. Smart, and Y. Ping, Carbon trimer as a 2 ev single-photon emitter candidate in hexagonal boron nitride: A first-principles study, Phys. Rev. Mater.6, L042201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    C. Jara, T. Rauch, S. Botti, M. A. Marques, A. Noram- buena, R. Coto, J. Castellanos- ´Aguila, J. R. Maze, and F. Munoz, First-principles identification of single photon emitters based on carbon clusters in hexagonal boron ni- tride, J. Phys. Chem. A125, 1325 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Li and A

    S. Li and A. Gali, Bistable carbon-vacancy defects in h- bn, Front. Quantum Sci. Technol.1, 1007756 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    M. A. Ortigoza and S. Stolbov, Thermodynamic stabil- ity and optical properties of c-doping-induced defects in hexagonal boron nitride as potential single-photon emit- ters, Phys. Rev. B105, 165306 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Babar, ´A

    R. Babar, ´A. Ganyecz, I. A. Abrikosov, G. Barcza, and V. Iv´ ady, Carbon-contaminated topological defects in hexagonal boron nitride for quantum photonics, npj 2D Mater. Appl.9, 33 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Benedek, R

    Z. Benedek, R. Babar, ´A. Ganyecz, T. Szilv´ asi,¨O. Leg- eza, G. Barcza, and V. Iv´ ady, Symmetric carbon tetramers forming spin qubits in hexagonal boron nitride, npj Comput. Mater.9, 187 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    S. Li, A. Pershin, G. Thiering, P. Udvarhelyi, and A. Gali, Ultraviolet quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride from carbon clusters, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.13, 3150 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    S. X. Li, T. Ichihara, H. Park, G. He, D. Kozawa, Y. Wen, V. B. Koman, Y. Zeng, M. Kuehne, Z. Yuan,et al., Pro- longed photostability in hexagonal boron nitride quan- tum emitters, Commun. Mater.4, 19 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Li and A

    S. Li and A. Gali, Identification of an oxygen defect in hexagonal boron nitride, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.13, 9544 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Cholsuk, A

    C. Cholsuk, A. C ¸ akan, V. Deckert, S. Suwanna, and T. Vogl, Raman signatures of single point defects in hexagonal boron nitride quantum emitters, npj Comput. Mater. (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    M. E. Turiansky, A. Alkauskas, L. C. Bassett, and C. G. Van de Walle, Dangling bonds in hexagonal boron nitride 7 as single-photon emitters, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 127401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Pelini, C

    T. Pelini, C. Elias, R. Page, L. Xue, S. Liu, J. Li, J. Edgar, A. Dr´ eau, V. Jacques, P. Valvin,et al., Shallow and deep levels in carbon-doped hexagonal boron nitride crystals, Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 094001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    J. Plo, A. Pershin, S. Li, T. Poirier, E. Janzen, H. Schutte, M. Tian, M. Wynn, S. Bernard, A. Rousseau, et al., Isotope substitution and polytype control for point defects identification: the case of the ultraviolet color center in hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. X15, 021045 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Iwa´ nski, K

    J. Iwa´ nski, K. P. Korona, M. Tokarczyk, G. Kowalski, A. K. Dabrowska, P. Tatarczak, I. Rogala, M. Bilska, M. W´ ojcik, S. Kret,et al., Revealing polytypism in 2d boron nitride with uv photoluminescence, npj 2D Mater. Appl.8, 72 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    A. Gale, C. Li, Y. Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, Site-specific fabrication of blue quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Photonics9, 2170 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    T. W. Tang, R. Ritika, M. Tamtaji, H. Liu, Y. Hu, Z. Liu, P. R. Galligan, M. Xu, J. Shen, J. Wang,et al., Structured-defect engineering of hexagonal boron nitride for identified visible single-photon emitters, ACS Nano 19, 8509 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Maciaszek and L

    M. Maciaszek and L. Razinkovas, Blue quantum emitter in hexagonal boron nitride and a carbon chain tetramer: a first-principles study, ACS Appl. Nano Mater.7, 18979 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Tan, J.-M

    Q. Tan, J.-M. Lai, X.-L. Liu, D. Guo, Y. Xue, X. Dou, B.-Q. Sun, H.-X. Deng, P.-H. Tan, I. Aharonovich, et al., Donor–acceptor pair quantum emitters in hexago- nal boron nitride, Nano Lett.22, 1331 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    E. A. Mejia, J. M. Woods, S. B. Chand, E. Ramjattan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Pelliciari, and G. Grosso, General algorithm for characterization of donor-acceptor pair recombination processes in solid-state materials, Opt. Mater. Express14, 2122 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996)

    work page 1996

  53. [53]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    work page 1996

  54. [54]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    work page 1994

  55. [55]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    work page 1999

  56. [56]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A con- sistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 ele- ments h-pu, J. Chem. Phys.132, 154104 (2010)

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Hybrid func- tionals based on a screened coulomb potential, J. Chem. Phys.118, 8207 (2003)

    work page 2003

  58. [58]

    A. Gali, M. Fyta, and E. Kaxiras, Ab initio supercell cal- culations on nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond: Elec- tronic structure and hyperfine tensors, Phys. Rev. B77, 155206 (2008)

    work page 2008

  59. [59]

    Freysoldt, J

    C. Freysoldt, J. Neugebauer, and C. G. Van de Walle, Fully ab initio finite-size corrections for charged-defect supercell calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 016402 (2009)

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip: An open-source python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer physics communica- tions183, 1760 (2012)

    work page 2012

  61. [61]

    Maciaszek, L

    M. Maciaszek, L. Razinkovas, and A. Alkauskas, Ther- modynamics of carbon point defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. Mater.6, 014005 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    Auburger and A

    P. Auburger and A. Gali, Towards ab initio identification of paramagnetic substitutional carbon defects in hexag- onal boron nitride acting as quantum bits, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075410 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    X. Gao, S. Vaidya, K. Li, Z. Ge, S. Dikshit, S. Zhang, P. Ju, K. Shen, Y. Jin, Y. Ping,et al., Single nuclear spin detection and control in a van der waals material, Nature 643, 943 (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Grosso, H

    G. Grosso, H. Moon, B. Lienhard, S. Ali, D. K. Efe- tov, M. M. Furchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, M. J. Ford, I. Aharonovich, and D. Englund, Tunable and high- purity room temperature single-photon emission from atomic defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Nat. commun. 8, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    Singh, I

    P. Singh, I. O. Robertson, S. C. Scholten, A. J. Healey, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, H. H. Tan, M. Kianinia, I. Aharonovich, D. A. Broadway,et al., Violet to near- infrared optical addressing of spin pairs in hexagonal boron nitride, Adv. Mater.37, 2414846 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    I. O. Robertson, B. Whitefield, S. C. Scholten, P. Singh, A. J. Healey, P. Reineck, M. Kianinia, G. Barcza, V. Iv´ ady, D. A. Broadway,et al., A charge transfer mech- anism for optically addressable solid-state spin pairs, Nat. Phys.21, 1981 (2025)

    work page 1981

  67. [67]

    Whitefield, H

    B. Whitefield, H. Z. J. Zeng, J. Liddle-Wesolowski, I. O. Robertson, ´A. Ganyecz, V. Iv´ ady, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Toth, J.-P. Tetienne,et al., Narrow- band quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride with optically addressable spins, Nat. Mater.25, 412 (2026)

    work page 2026

  68. [68]

    Vaidya, X

    S. Vaidya, X. Gao, S. Dikshit, Z. Fang, A. E. Llac- sahuanga Allcca, Y. P. Chen, Q. Yan, and T. Li, Coher- ent spins in van der waals semiconductor ges2 at ambient conditions, Nano Lett.25, 14356 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    W. Liu, S. Li, N.-J. Guo, X.-D. Zeng, L.-K. Xie, J.-Y. Liu, Y.-H. Ma, Y.-Q. Wu, Y.-T. Wang, Z.-A. Wang,et al., Experimental observation of spin defects in the van der waals material ges2, Nano Lett.25, 16330 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Maciaszek and B

    M. Maciaszek and B. Baur, Cbvb-nh complexes as preva- lent defects in metal-organic vapor-phase epitaxy-grown hexagonal boron nitride, npj 2D Mater. Appl. (2026)

    work page 2026