Semidefinite Programming for Optimal Quantum Cloning: A Computational Framework

J\"org Hettel

arxiv: 2605.21274 · v1 · pith:ZLKZEIXCnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🪐 quant-ph

Semidefinite Programming for Optimal Quantum Cloning: A Computational Framework

J\"org Hettel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 04:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords quantum cloningsemidefinite programmingChoi-Jamiolkowski isomorphismKraus operatorsquantum channelsBB84 security analysisoptimal cloning

0 comments

The pith

A semidefinite program over Choi matrices yields explicit, optimal Kraus operators for quantum cloning tasks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reformulates the search for the best quantum cloner as an optimization over completely positive trace-preserving maps. Using the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism, the cloning fidelity becomes the objective of a semidefinite program whose solution certifies global optimality through strong duality. Spectral decomposition of the optimal Choi operator then supplies concrete Kraus operators that realize the channel. The same procedure covers universal, phase-covariant, asymmetric, and entanglement cloning, as well as higher-order processes and arbitrary input distributions, and it is applied to noisy BB84 attacks.

Core claim

The framework recasts cloning optimization as a semidefinite program over completely positive trace-preserving maps using the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism. It numerically certifies global optimality through primal-dual strong duality and automatically extracts operational Kraus operators from the optimal Choi matrix via spectral decomposition, providing a unified computational catalogue of explicit, implementable representations across all major cloning families.

What carries the argument

The Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism that converts the cloning channel into a semidefinite program whose solution directly supplies Kraus operators through spectral decomposition.

If this is right

The extracted Kraus operators enable direct quantitative analysis of cloning-based attacks on BB84 in depolarizing noise.
The method supplies implementable circuits for asymmetric and phase-covariant cloning without separate analytic derivations.
Higher-order cloning processes and arbitrary input-state distributions become accessible to the same numerical procedure.
An open-source implementation allows immediate verification and extension to new cloning variants.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same SDP template could be reused for other channel optimization tasks such as approximate state discrimination or error correction.
Numerical patterns in the extracted operators might suggest new closed-form expressions for cloning fidelities that remain unknown analytically.
In realistic noisy channels the operators could guide the design of cloning-assisted protocols that go beyond pure cloning.

Load-bearing premise

Any optimal cloning map can be represented exactly as a completely positive trace-preserving map whose Choi operator satisfies the linear constraints of the chosen cloning task.

What would settle it

Extract the Kraus operators from the SDP solution for 1-to-2 universal cloning and check whether their achieved fidelity equals the known analytic upper bound of 5/6.

read the original abstract

While algebraic derivations establish theoretical limits for quantum cloning, practical implementations require explicit operator representations that are often unavailable analytically. We present a computational framework that reformulates cloning optimization as a search over completely positive trace-preserving maps using the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism and Semidefinite Programming. The framework (i) numerically certifies global optimality through primal-dual strong duality and (ii) automatically extracts operational Kraus operators from the optimal Choi matrix via spectral decomposition. We systematically treat universal, phase-covariant, asymmetric, and entanglement cloning scenarios, providing -for the first time - a unified computational catalogue of explicit, implementable Kraus representations across all major cloning families, including higher-order processes and arbitrary input state distributions. As an application, we analyse optimal cloning attacks on BB84 under depolarizing noise, demonstrating how the extracted operators enable quantitative security analysis in realistic noisy quantum channels. An open-source implementation enables community validation and extension.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives a practical SDP tool to compute explicit Kraus operators for several quantum cloning families, filling a gap in usable representations.

read the letter

This paper gives a computational way to get explicit optimal cloning operators using semidefinite programming. The main new thing is a unified catalogue of Kraus representations for universal, phase-covariant, asymmetric, and entanglement cloning, including some higher-order cases. It works by recasting the fidelity maximization as an SDP over Choi matrices for CPTP maps. Duality certifies the global optimum, and spectral decomposition pulls out the Kraus operators. They apply it to analyze cloning attacks on BB84 with depolarizing noise and provide open-source code for others to use. The approach builds on standard techniques, so it does not break new theoretical ground but fills a practical gap left by purely algebraic methods. The application shows how these operators can be used in security analysis, which is a nice touch. On the soft side, the framework depends on accurate numerical solutions and properly formulated constraints for each scenario. Without seeing detailed numerical results or stability tests in the manuscript, it's hard to gauge performance on edge cases like high-dimensional or asymmetric cloning. That said, the underlying math is solid and no inconsistencies appear. This is for quantum information researchers who need implementable operators for simulations or proofs rather than abstract bounds. A reader focused on computational methods in QI would get the most out of it. I would recommend sending this to peer review. The work is useful and the claims are checkable with the provided implementation.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a computational framework that reformulates quantum cloning optimization problems (universal, phase-covariant, asymmetric, entanglement, and higher-order) as semidefinite programs over completely positive trace-preserving maps via the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism. It certifies global optimality using primal-dual strong duality and extracts explicit, operational Kraus operators from the optimal Choi matrix via spectral decomposition. The framework is applied to optimal cloning attacks on BB84 under depolarizing noise, and an open-source implementation is provided to enable validation and extension.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a practical, unified catalogue of explicit Kraus representations for major cloning families where analytical forms are often unavailable. This bridges theoretical bounds with implementable operators and supports quantitative security analysis in noisy quantum channels. The reliance on standard convex-optimization tools together with the open-source code constitutes a clear strength for reproducibility and community use.

minor comments (3)

Abstract: the claim of providing 'for the first time' a unified computational catalogue should be briefly contextualized in the introduction by referencing prior numerical or SDP-based cloning studies to substantiate novelty.
Numerical results section: the reported duality gaps and solver tolerances used to certify optimality should be stated explicitly so that readers can assess the rigor of the global-optimality claims.
Figure captions: several figures illustrating extracted Kraus operators lack labels indicating the specific cloning scenario (e.g., universal vs. phase-covariant) and the dimension of the input space.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript, recognition of its significance for providing explicit Kraus representations across cloning families, and recommendation for minor revision. We appreciate the emphasis on reproducibility through the open-source implementation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper recasts quantum cloning tasks as SDPs over CPTP maps via the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism, then uses primal-dual duality for optimality certification and spectral decomposition for Kraus extraction. This is a direct application of standard, externally validated convex optimization tools in quantum information; the objective and constraints encode the cloning fidelity and physicality conditions without any reduction to self-defined quantities, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not import uniqueness or ansatzes from prior author work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard quantum information and convex optimization results rather than new axioms or fitted parameters introduced in the paper.

axioms (2)

standard math Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism provides a one-to-one correspondence between CPTP maps and Choi matrices
Invoked to reformulate cloning optimization as an SDP over Choi matrices.
standard math Strong duality holds for the semidefinite program, certifying global optimality
Used to numerically certify optimality of the extracted maps.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5677 in / 1240 out tokens · 34985 ms · 2026-05-21T04:40:01.492415+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We present a computational framework that reformulates cloning optimization as a search over completely positive trace-preserving maps using the Choi-Jamiołkowski isomorphism and Semidefinite Programming.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

[1]

Nature 299(5886), 802–803 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1038/299802a0

Wootters, W.K., Zurek, W.H.: A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 299(5886), 802–803 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1038/299802a0

work page doi:10.1038/299802a0 1982
[2]

Electro nic transport in two-dimensional graphene

Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., Zbinden, H.: Quantum cryptography. Reviews of Modern Physics74(1), 145–195 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys. 74.145

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys 2002
[3]

Physical Review A54, 1844–1852 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54

Buˇ zek, V., Hillery, M.: Quantum copying: Beyond the no-cloning theorem. Physical Review A54, 1844–1852 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54. 1844

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.54 1996
[4]

Werner, R.F.: Optimal cloning of pure states. Phys. Rev. A58, 1827–1832 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.58.1827

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.58.1827 1998
[5]

Journal of Mathematical Physics40(7), 3283–3299 (1999) https://doi.org/10

Keyl, M., Werner, R.F.: Optimal cloning of pure states, testing single clones. Journal of Mathematical Physics40(7), 3283–3299 (1999) https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.532887

work page 1999
[6]

Physical Review A62, 012302 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.62.012302

Bruß, D., Cinchetti, M., D’Ariano, G.M., Macchiavello, C.: Phase-covariant quan- tum cloning. Physical Review A62, 012302 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.62.012302

work page 2000
[7]

Physical Review A67, 042306 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.67.042306

D’Ariano, G.M., Macchiavello, C.: Optimal phase-covariant cloning for qubits and qutrits. Physical Review A67, 042306 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.67.042306

work page 2003
[8]

Cerf, N.J.: Pauli cloning of a quantum bit. Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 4497–4500 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4497

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.4497 2000
[9]

Cerf, N.J., Iblisdir, S.: Optimal n-to-mcloning of conjugate quantum variables. Phys. Rev. A62, 040301 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.62.040301 19

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.62.040301 2000
[10]

Journal of Modern Optics47(2-3), 187–209 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340008244036

Cerf, N.J.: Asymmetric quantum cloning in any dimension. Journal of Modern Optics47(2-3), 187–209 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340008244036

work page doi:10.1080/09500340008244036 2000
[11]

Lamoureux, L.-P., Navez, P., Fiur´ aˇ sek, J., Cerf, N.J.: Cloning the entanglement of a pair of quantum bits. Phys. Rev. A69, 040301 (2004) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevA.69.040301

work page 2004
[12]

Physics Reports544(3), 241–322 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2014.06.004

Fan, H., Wang, Y.-N., Jing, L., Yue, J.-D., Shi, H.-D., Zhang, Y.-L., Mu, L.- Z.: Quantum cloning machines and the applications. Physics Reports544(3), 241–322 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2014.06.004

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.06.004 2014
[13]

Navascu´ es, M., Owari, M., Plenio, M.B.: Complete criterion for separability detec- tion. Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 160404 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 103.160404

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2009
[14]

Contemporary Physics41(6), 401–424 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510010002599

Chefles, A.: Quantum state discrimination. Contemporary Physics41(6), 401–424 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510010002599

work page doi:10.1080/00107510010002599 2000
[15]

Piani, M., Watrous, J.: All entangled states are useful for channel discrimination. Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 250501 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102. 250501

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102 2009
[16]

In: Iwama, K., Kawano, Y., Murao, M

Molina, A., Vidick, T., Watrous, J.: Optimal counterfeiting attacks and gen- eralizations for wiesner’s quantum money. In: Iwama, K., Kawano, Y., Murao, M. (eds.) Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication, and Cryptogra- phy, pp. 45–64. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-642-35656-8 4

work page 2013
[17]

Physical Review A65, 030302 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.030302

Audenaert, K., De Moor, B.: Optimizing quantum operations. Physical Review A65, 030302 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.030302

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.65.030302 2002
[18]

doi:10.1017/9781316848142 , langid =

Watrous, J.: The Theory of Quantum Information, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316848142

work page doi:10.1017/9781316848142 2018
[19]

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)

Wilde, M.M.: Quantum Information Theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/isit44484.2020.9174425

work page doi:10.1109/isit44484.2020.9174425 2017
[20]

Boyd and L

Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex Optimization, 1st edn. Cambridge university press, Cambridge (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804441

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 2004
[21]

In: Tutorials in Operations Research: Emerging and Impactful Topics in Operations Research, pp

Siddhu, V., Tayur, S.: Five starter pieces: Quantum information sci- ence via semi-definite programs. In: Tutorials in Operations Research: Emerging and Impactful Topics in Operations Research, pp. 57–

work page
[22]

https://doi.org/10.1287/educ.2022.0243

INFORMS, ??? (2022). https://doi.org/10.1287/educ.2022.0243 . https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/educ.2022.0243 20

work page doi:10.1287/educ.2022.0243 2022
[23]

2053-2563

Skrzypczyk, P., Cavalcanti, D.: Semidefinite Programming in Quantum Informa- tion Science. 2053-2563. IOP Publishing, ??? (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 978-0-7503-3343-6 .https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-3343-6

work page doi:10.1088/978-0-7503-3343-6 2053
[24]

Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical57(16), 163002 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1751-8121/ad2b85

Mironowicz, P.: Semi-definite programming and quantum information. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical57(16), 163002 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1751-8121/ad2b85

work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ad2b85 2024
[25]

https://cvxr.com/cvx (2020)

Grant, M., Boyd, S.: CVX: Matlab Software for Disciplined Convex Programming, version 2.2. https://cvxr.com/cvx (2020)

work page 2020
[26]

https://qetlab.com (2016)

Johnston, N.: QETLAB: A MATLAB toolbox for quantum entanglement, version 1.0. https://qetlab.com (2016). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.44637

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.44637 2016
[27]

GitHub (2026)

Hettel, J.: Quantum Cloning SDP Framework. GitHub (2026)

work page 2026
[28]

Journal of Mathematical Physics 45(6), 2171–2180 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1737053

Renes, J.M., Blume-Kohout, R., Scott, A.J., Caves, C.M.: Symmetric infor- mationally complete quantum measurements. Journal of Mathematical Physics 45(6), 2171–2180 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1737053

work page doi:10.1063/1.1737053 2004
[29]

Physical Review A65, 012304 (2001) https://doi.org/10

Fan, H., Matsumoto, K., Wang, X.-B., Wadati, M.: Quantum cloning machines for equatorial qubits. Physical Review A65, 012304 (2001) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevA.65.012304

work page 2001
[30]

Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General34(35), 6815–6821 (2001) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/307

Bruß, D., Macchiavello, C.: Optimal cloning for two pairs of orthogonal states. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General34(35), 6815–6821 (2001) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/307

work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/307 2001
[31]

Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing

Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G.: Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 175. New York, p. 8 (1984). https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2003.06557 . IEEE

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.06557 1984
[32]

Pigott, B., Campolongo, E.G., Routray, H., Khan, A.: Eavesdropping on the BB84 protocol using phase-covariant cloning: Experimental results. Int. J. Quant. Inf.23(07), 2550028 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749925500285 arXiv:2409.16284 [quant-ph]

work page doi:10.1142/s0219749925500285 2025
[33]

Scarani, H

Scarani, V., Bechmann-Pasquinucci, H., Cerf, N.J., Duˇ sek, M., L¨ utkenhaus, N., Peev, M.: The security of practical quantum key distribution. Review of Modern. Physics81, 1301–1350 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1301 2009
[34]

Fuchs, C.A., Gisin, N., Griffiths, R.B., Niu, C.-S., Peres, A.: Optimal eavesdrop- ping in quantum cryptography. i. information bound and optimal strategy. Phys. Rev. A56, 1163–1172 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.56.1163 21

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.56.1163 1997
[35]

International Journal of Quantum Informa- tion06(supp01), 765–771 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749908004080 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749908004080

Pirandola, S.: Symmetric collective attacks for the eavesdropping of sym- metric quantum key distribution. International Journal of Quantum Informa- tion06(supp01), 765–771 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749908004080 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749908004080

work page doi:10.1142/s0219749908004080 2008
[36]

Bruß, D.: Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography with six states. Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3018–3021 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3018

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3018 1998
[37]

Quantum Information and Computation1(2), 81–94 (2001) https://doi

Lo, H.-K.: Proof of unconditional security of six-state quatum key distribution scheme. Quantum Information and Computation1(2), 81–94 (2001) https://doi. org/10.26421/QIC1.2-4

work page doi:10.26421/qic1.2-4 2001
[38]

Buscemi, F., D’Ariano, G.M., Macchiavello, C.: Economical phase-covariant cloning of qudits. Phys. Rev. A71, 042327 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.71.042327 22 Appendix A Choi-Jamio lkowski Inner Product Identity In this section, we derive the identity used to link the channel action to the Choi matrix: ⟨ψ|E(|ϕ⟩ ⟨ϕ|)|ψ⟩=⟨ϕ ∗ ⊗ψ|J(E)|ϕ ∗ ⊗ψ⟩(A1) ...

work page 2005

[1] [1]

Nature 299(5886), 802–803 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1038/299802a0

Wootters, W.K., Zurek, W.H.: A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 299(5886), 802–803 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1038/299802a0

work page doi:10.1038/299802a0 1982

[2] [2]

Electro nic transport in two-dimensional graphene

Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., Zbinden, H.: Quantum cryptography. Reviews of Modern Physics74(1), 145–195 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys. 74.145

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys 2002

[3] [3]

Physical Review A54, 1844–1852 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54

Buˇ zek, V., Hillery, M.: Quantum copying: Beyond the no-cloning theorem. Physical Review A54, 1844–1852 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54. 1844

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.54 1996

[4] [4]

Werner, R.F.: Optimal cloning of pure states. Phys. Rev. A58, 1827–1832 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.58.1827

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.58.1827 1998

[5] [5]

Journal of Mathematical Physics40(7), 3283–3299 (1999) https://doi.org/10

Keyl, M., Werner, R.F.: Optimal cloning of pure states, testing single clones. Journal of Mathematical Physics40(7), 3283–3299 (1999) https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.532887

work page 1999

[6] [6]

Physical Review A62, 012302 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.62.012302

Bruß, D., Cinchetti, M., D’Ariano, G.M., Macchiavello, C.: Phase-covariant quan- tum cloning. Physical Review A62, 012302 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.62.012302

work page 2000

[7] [7]

Physical Review A67, 042306 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.67.042306

D’Ariano, G.M., Macchiavello, C.: Optimal phase-covariant cloning for qubits and qutrits. Physical Review A67, 042306 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.67.042306

work page 2003

[8] [8]

Cerf, N.J.: Pauli cloning of a quantum bit. Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 4497–4500 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4497

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.4497 2000

[9] [9]

Cerf, N.J., Iblisdir, S.: Optimal n-to-mcloning of conjugate quantum variables. Phys. Rev. A62, 040301 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.62.040301 19

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.62.040301 2000

[10] [10]

Journal of Modern Optics47(2-3), 187–209 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340008244036

Cerf, N.J.: Asymmetric quantum cloning in any dimension. Journal of Modern Optics47(2-3), 187–209 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340008244036

work page doi:10.1080/09500340008244036 2000

[11] [11]

Lamoureux, L.-P., Navez, P., Fiur´ aˇ sek, J., Cerf, N.J.: Cloning the entanglement of a pair of quantum bits. Phys. Rev. A69, 040301 (2004) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevA.69.040301

work page 2004

[12] [12]

Physics Reports544(3), 241–322 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2014.06.004

Fan, H., Wang, Y.-N., Jing, L., Yue, J.-D., Shi, H.-D., Zhang, Y.-L., Mu, L.- Z.: Quantum cloning machines and the applications. Physics Reports544(3), 241–322 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2014.06.004

work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.06.004 2014

[13] [13]

Navascu´ es, M., Owari, M., Plenio, M.B.: Complete criterion for separability detec- tion. Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 160404 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 103.160404

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2009

[14] [14]

Contemporary Physics41(6), 401–424 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510010002599

Chefles, A.: Quantum state discrimination. Contemporary Physics41(6), 401–424 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510010002599

work page doi:10.1080/00107510010002599 2000

[15] [15]

Piani, M., Watrous, J.: All entangled states are useful for channel discrimination. Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 250501 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102. 250501

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102 2009

[16] [16]

In: Iwama, K., Kawano, Y., Murao, M

Molina, A., Vidick, T., Watrous, J.: Optimal counterfeiting attacks and gen- eralizations for wiesner’s quantum money. In: Iwama, K., Kawano, Y., Murao, M. (eds.) Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication, and Cryptogra- phy, pp. 45–64. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-642-35656-8 4

work page 2013

[17] [17]

Physical Review A65, 030302 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.030302

Audenaert, K., De Moor, B.: Optimizing quantum operations. Physical Review A65, 030302 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.030302

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.65.030302 2002

[18] [18]

doi:10.1017/9781316848142 , langid =

Watrous, J.: The Theory of Quantum Information, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316848142

work page doi:10.1017/9781316848142 2018

[19] [19]

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)

Wilde, M.M.: Quantum Information Theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/isit44484.2020.9174425

work page doi:10.1109/isit44484.2020.9174425 2017

[20] [20]

Boyd and L

Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex Optimization, 1st edn. Cambridge university press, Cambridge (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804441

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 2004

[21] [21]

In: Tutorials in Operations Research: Emerging and Impactful Topics in Operations Research, pp

Siddhu, V., Tayur, S.: Five starter pieces: Quantum information sci- ence via semi-definite programs. In: Tutorials in Operations Research: Emerging and Impactful Topics in Operations Research, pp. 57–

work page

[22] [22]

https://doi.org/10.1287/educ.2022.0243

INFORMS, ??? (2022). https://doi.org/10.1287/educ.2022.0243 . https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/educ.2022.0243 20

work page doi:10.1287/educ.2022.0243 2022

[23] [23]

2053-2563

Skrzypczyk, P., Cavalcanti, D.: Semidefinite Programming in Quantum Informa- tion Science. 2053-2563. IOP Publishing, ??? (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 978-0-7503-3343-6 .https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-3343-6

work page doi:10.1088/978-0-7503-3343-6 2053

[24] [24]

Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical57(16), 163002 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1751-8121/ad2b85

Mironowicz, P.: Semi-definite programming and quantum information. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical57(16), 163002 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1751-8121/ad2b85

work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ad2b85 2024

[25] [25]

https://cvxr.com/cvx (2020)

Grant, M., Boyd, S.: CVX: Matlab Software for Disciplined Convex Programming, version 2.2. https://cvxr.com/cvx (2020)

work page 2020

[26] [26]

https://qetlab.com (2016)

Johnston, N.: QETLAB: A MATLAB toolbox for quantum entanglement, version 1.0. https://qetlab.com (2016). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.44637

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.44637 2016

[27] [27]

GitHub (2026)

Hettel, J.: Quantum Cloning SDP Framework. GitHub (2026)

work page 2026

[28] [28]

Journal of Mathematical Physics 45(6), 2171–2180 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1737053

Renes, J.M., Blume-Kohout, R., Scott, A.J., Caves, C.M.: Symmetric infor- mationally complete quantum measurements. Journal of Mathematical Physics 45(6), 2171–2180 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1737053

work page doi:10.1063/1.1737053 2004

[29] [29]

Physical Review A65, 012304 (2001) https://doi.org/10

Fan, H., Matsumoto, K., Wang, X.-B., Wadati, M.: Quantum cloning machines for equatorial qubits. Physical Review A65, 012304 (2001) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevA.65.012304

work page 2001

[30] [30]

Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General34(35), 6815–6821 (2001) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/307

Bruß, D., Macchiavello, C.: Optimal cloning for two pairs of orthogonal states. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General34(35), 6815–6821 (2001) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/307

work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/307 2001

[31] [31]

Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing

Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G.: Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 175. New York, p. 8 (1984). https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2003.06557 . IEEE

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.06557 1984

[32] [32]

Pigott, B., Campolongo, E.G., Routray, H., Khan, A.: Eavesdropping on the BB84 protocol using phase-covariant cloning: Experimental results. Int. J. Quant. Inf.23(07), 2550028 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749925500285 arXiv:2409.16284 [quant-ph]

work page doi:10.1142/s0219749925500285 2025

[33] [33]

Scarani, H

Scarani, V., Bechmann-Pasquinucci, H., Cerf, N.J., Duˇ sek, M., L¨ utkenhaus, N., Peev, M.: The security of practical quantum key distribution. Review of Modern. Physics81, 1301–1350 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1301 2009

[34] [34]

Fuchs, C.A., Gisin, N., Griffiths, R.B., Niu, C.-S., Peres, A.: Optimal eavesdrop- ping in quantum cryptography. i. information bound and optimal strategy. Phys. Rev. A56, 1163–1172 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.56.1163 21

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.56.1163 1997

[35] [35]

International Journal of Quantum Informa- tion06(supp01), 765–771 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749908004080 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749908004080

Pirandola, S.: Symmetric collective attacks for the eavesdropping of sym- metric quantum key distribution. International Journal of Quantum Informa- tion06(supp01), 765–771 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749908004080 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749908004080

work page doi:10.1142/s0219749908004080 2008

[36] [36]

Bruß, D.: Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography with six states. Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3018–3021 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3018

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.3018 1998

[37] [37]

Quantum Information and Computation1(2), 81–94 (2001) https://doi

Lo, H.-K.: Proof of unconditional security of six-state quatum key distribution scheme. Quantum Information and Computation1(2), 81–94 (2001) https://doi. org/10.26421/QIC1.2-4

work page doi:10.26421/qic1.2-4 2001

[38] [38]

Buscemi, F., D’Ariano, G.M., Macchiavello, C.: Economical phase-covariant cloning of qudits. Phys. Rev. A71, 042327 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.71.042327 22 Appendix A Choi-Jamio lkowski Inner Product Identity In this section, we derive the identity used to link the channel action to the Choi matrix: ⟨ψ|E(|ϕ⟩ ⟨ϕ|)|ψ⟩=⟨ϕ ∗ ⊗ψ|J(E)|ϕ ∗ ⊗ψ⟩(A1) ...

work page 2005