pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21336 · v1 · pith:BO7PGG7Gnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.str-el

Unconventional Magnetism: Symmetry Classification, Hybrid-parity and Unconstrained-parity Classes

Xun-Jiang Luo , Dan Li , Rui-Chun Xiao , Ding-Fu Shao , Lei Li , Mingliang Tian , Yugui Yao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 03:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el
keywords unconventional magnetismhybrid-parity magnetsunconstrained-parity magnetsspin splittingsymmetry classificationaltermagnetsspintronicsEdelstein effect
0
0 comments X

The pith

Unconventional magnets include hybrid-parity and unconstrained-parity classes defined by spin texture parities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a classification of unconventional magnetism by examining how spin textures behave under momentum inversion through representation theory. It identifies two new categories beyond even-parity altermagnets and odd-parity magnets: hybrid-parity magnets where different spin components show opposite parities, and unconstrained-parity magnets where parity lacks a clear definition. Universal symmetry rules divide the hybrid class into three types. Calculations on FePO4 illustrate how hybrid-parity magnets can produce both spin currents and Edelstein effects at once.

Core claim

Unconventional magnetism is classified by the parity properties of spin textures under momentum inversion. Beyond the established pure even-parity and odd-parity cases, the framework reveals hybrid-parity magnets with contrasting parities across Cartesian components and unconstrained-parity magnets with ill-defined parity. Universal symmetry criteria assign hybrid-parity magnets to three types, and first-principles results on FePO4 confirm that these materials can combine spin-current and Edelstein-effect responses.

What carries the argument

Representation theory applied to the parity of spin textures under momentum inversion, which distinguishes pure-parity, hybrid-parity, and unconstrained-parity behaviors.

If this is right

  • Hybrid-parity magnets support simultaneous spin-current and Edelstein-effect responses in the same material.
  • Hybrid-parity magnets divide into three types according to the derived universal symmetry criteria.
  • The classification supplies symmetry rules that cover the full landscape of unconventional magnetic phases.
  • Materials such as FePO4 demonstrate the coexistence of multiple spintronic responses within a hybrid-parity phase.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Hybrid-parity materials could simplify device designs that require both current types without external magnetic fields.
  • The same parity framework may apply to other families of compensated magnets not examined in the calculations.
  • Accounting for temperature or higher-order terms might shift boundaries between the identified classes in real samples.

Load-bearing premise

Parity analysis of spin textures under momentum inversion through representation theory captures every possible unconventional magnetic phase without further restrictions from lattice details or interactions.

What would settle it

Discovery of a compensated magnet whose spin splitting exhibits parity behavior that fits none of the even, odd, hybrid, or unconstrained categories.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21336 by Dan Li, Ding-Fu Shao, Lei Li, Mingliang Tian, Rui-Chun Xiao, Xun-Jiang Luo, Yugui Yao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the even-parity, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Flowchart illustrating the symmetry classification of UM. Starting from the SSG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Crystal structure and magnetic order of bulk [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Unconventional magnetism has emerged as a transformative frontier in condensed matter physics. Such phases are characterized by substantial non-relativistic spin splitting (NSS) in symmetry-compensated magnets. They have been classified by the parity of their spin textures under momentum inversion, leading to the paradigms of altermagnets (even-parity) and odd-parity magnets. However, the full symmetry landscape remains largely unexplored. In this Letter, we present a systematic classification framework for unconventional magnetism based on the representation theory of the spin textures and the associated parity properties. Within this framework, we predict two previously unidentified classes beyond the established pure-parity categories: hybrid-parity magnets (HPMs) and unconstrained-parity magnets (UPMs), where the spin textures exhibit contrasting parities among their Cartesian components and the parity of the spin textures is ill-defined, respectively. We derive universal symmetry criteria that categorize HPMs into three distinct types. Importantly, by combining the spin splitting characteristics of altermagnets and odd-parity magnets, HPMs can enable the coexistence of the spin current and Edelstein effects. Taking FePO4 as an example, we perform first-principles calculations to demonstrate this coexistence. Finally, we discuss the potential applications of HPMs in spintronic devices. Our work provides a comprehensive symmetry classification of unconventional magnetism and establishes HPMs as a promising platform for multi-functional spintronics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a symmetry classification framework for unconventional magnetism based on the representation theory of spin textures and their parity properties under momentum inversion. It identifies two new classes beyond altermagnets (even parity) and odd-parity magnets: hybrid-parity magnets (HPMs), in which Cartesian components of the spin texture exhibit contrasting parities, and unconstrained-parity magnets (UPMs), in which the overall parity is ill-defined. Universal symmetry criteria are derived that divide HPMs into three types, and first-principles calculations on FePO4 are presented to illustrate coexistence of spin-current and Edelstein effects in an HPM.

Significance. If the classification is exhaustive and the FePO4 calculations confirm the predicted coexistence, the work would expand the taxonomy of symmetry-compensated magnets and identify HPMs as candidates for multifunctional spintronics. The explicit first-principles demonstration of effect coexistence provides a falsifiable anchor for the new classes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of universal symmetry criteria for HPMs] The central claim that representation theory of spin-texture parity under k-inversion furnishes a complete classification of unconventional phases (including the three HPM types) does not explicitly demonstrate incorporation of full magnetic-space-group constraints such as translations and specific point-group operations. These lattice-level restrictions can forbid certain parity combinations or render UPMs unrealizable; the universal criteria must be shown to remain non-restrictive after these constraints are imposed.
  2. [First-principles calculations on FePO4] The first-principles results on FePO4 that are invoked to demonstrate coexistence of spin-current and Edelstein effects lack reported computational parameters, k-mesh convergence, error estimates, and quantitative comparison of the spin-texture parities against the three HPM types. Without these details the numerical support for the central coexistence claim cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and classification framework] Notation for the three HPM types should be introduced with explicit labels (e.g., Type I, II, III) at first use rather than only in the abstract.
  2. [Classification framework] A brief comparison table of parity properties for altermagnets, odd-parity magnets, and the three HPM types would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which have helped us clarify and strengthen the presentation of our symmetry classification framework. We address each major comment in detail below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of universal symmetry criteria for HPMs] The central claim that representation theory of spin-texture parity under k-inversion furnishes a complete classification of unconventional phases (including the three HPM types) does not explicitly demonstrate incorporation of full magnetic-space-group constraints such as translations and specific point-group operations. These lattice-level restrictions can forbid certain parity combinations or render UPMs unrealizable; the universal criteria must be shown to remain non-restrictive after these constraints are imposed.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation on the need for explicit treatment of full magnetic space group (MSG) constraints. The universal symmetry criteria are derived from the representation theory of spin-texture parity under k-inversion, which is formulated at the level of the magnetic point group. In the revised manuscript we have added a clarifying subsection that explicitly addresses MSG elements: translations leave the parity classification invariant because the spin texture is defined on the Brillouin zone and k-inversion is a reciprocal-space operation; anti-translations and other MSG operations are already encoded in the allowed irreducible representations used to obtain the three HPM types. We further show, with concrete symmetry examples, that while certain parity combinations are forbidden by specific MSG operations, the universal criteria themselves classify all symmetry-allowed unconventional phases without additional restrictions. A short discussion of UPM realizability in selected MSGs is also included. These additions confirm that the criteria remain non-restrictive once full MSG constraints are imposed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [First-principles calculations on FePO4] The first-principles results on FePO4 that are invoked to demonstrate coexistence of spin-current and Edelstein effects lack reported computational parameters, k-mesh convergence, error estimates, and quantitative comparison of the spin-texture parities against the three HPM types. Without these details the numerical support for the central coexistence claim cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that the computational details must be provided for reproducibility and proper assessment of the numerical evidence. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the methods section to report all relevant parameters (exchange-correlation functional, plane-wave cutoff, k-mesh, convergence thresholds) and have added a supplementary figure showing k-mesh convergence of the spin splitting and response functions. Quantitative error estimates derived from the numerical precision of the DFT calculations are now stated. Most importantly, we include a direct, component-wise comparison of the calculated spin-texture parities in FePO4 against the definitions of the three HPM types, establishing that FePO4 realizes a type-II hybrid-parity magnet. These revisions supply the missing quantitative support for the predicted coexistence of spin-current and Edelstein effects. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Symmetry classification via representation theory is self-contained and non-circular.

full rationale

The paper applies standard representation theory of magnetic groups to analyze parity of spin textures under momentum inversion, identifying HPMs and UPMs as extensions of known even/odd parity cases. Universal symmetry criteria for HPM subtypes follow directly from this analysis. The FePO4 demonstration uses independent first-principles calculations to show coexistence of effects, rather than any fitted or self-referential prediction. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatz smuggling, or reductions of predictions to inputs by construction appear in the derivation chain. The framework is grounded in external group-theoretic tools and remains falsifiable against full magnetic space group constraints.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The framework rests on standard assumptions of magnetic symmetry groups and representation theory for spin textures; no free parameters or new physical entities with independent evidence are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spin textures in symmetry-compensated magnets can be classified by their parity properties under momentum inversion using representation theory of the magnetic point group.
    This is the foundational premise invoked to derive the hybrid-parity and unconstrained-parity classes.
invented entities (2)
  • Hybrid-parity magnets (HPMs) no independent evidence
    purpose: Categorize magnets whose spin texture Cartesian components exhibit contrasting parities.
    New class defined by the symmetry classification; no independent experimental evidence provided in abstract.
  • Unconstrained-parity magnets (UPMs) no independent evidence
    purpose: Categorize magnets where the parity of spin textures is ill-defined.
    New class defined by the symmetry classification; no independent experimental evidence provided in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5811 in / 1468 out tokens · 52158 ms · 2026-05-21T03:22:42.451293+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-zantiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    González-Hernández, T

    L.Smejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci- ence Advances6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Na- ture Communications12, 2846 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L.Smejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. González-Hernández, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, L. Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and Z. Liu, An anomalous hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nature Elec- tronics5, 735 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    L.Smejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. González-Hernández, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling mag- netoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromag- nets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Sinova, and T

    L.Smejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Shao, Y.-Y

    D.-F. Shao, Y.-Y. Jiang, J. Ding, S.-H. Zhang, Z.-A. Wang, R.-C. Xiao, G. Gurung, W. J. Lu, Y. P. Sun, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Néel spin currents in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Krempaský, L.Smejkal, S

    J. Krempaský, L.Smejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Ha- jlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhlírová, F. Alarab, P. C. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. González-Hernández, A. Birk Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlová, Z.Sobán, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, P. Wadley, J. Sinova, D. Kriegner, J. Minár, J. H. Dil, and T. Jungwirth, Altermagnetic lifting of krame...

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Predictable gate-field control of spin in alter- magnets with spin-layer coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 056401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L.Smejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Crystal thermal transport in altermagneticruo 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 056701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L.Smejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, T. Denneulin, W. Shi, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, S. Das, M. Kläui, J. Sinova, and M. Jourdan, Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in crsb thin films, Nature Communications15, 2116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L.Smejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y.Yao,Altermagnetism: Exploringnewfrontiersinmag- netism and spintronics, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2409327 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau theory of alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 176702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L.Smejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic mnte, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Shao and E

    D.-F. Shao and E. Y. Tsymbal, Antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions for spintronics, npj Spintronics2, 13 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    J.-X. Hu, O. Matsyshyn, and J. C. W. Song, Nonlinear superconducting magnetoelectric effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 026001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    X. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Liu, Y. Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear mag- nets dictated by spin space groups, Nature640, 349 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Xiao, L.-X

    S.-S.Zhang, Z.-A.Wang, B.Li, Y.-Y.Jiang, S.-H.Zhang, R.-C. Xiao, L.-X. Liu, X. Luo, W.-J. Lu, M. Tian, Y.- P. Sun, E. Y. Tsymbal, H. Du, and D.-F. Shao, X- type stacking in cross-chain antiferromagnets, Newton1, 10.1016/j.newton.2025.100068 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newton.2025.100068 2025

  20. [20]

    Q. Liu, X. Dai, and S. Blügel, Different facets of uncon- ventional magnetism, Nature Physics21, 329 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [22]

    Y. Yu, X. Chen, Y. Zhu, Y. Li, R. Xiong, J. Li, Y. Liu, and Q. Liu, Identifying Oriented Spin Space Groups and Related Physical Properties Using an Online Platform FINDSPINGROUP, arXiv:2604.21397 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [23]

    Shao, S.-H

    D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Spin-neutral currents for spintronics, Nature Communications12, 7061 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [24]

    H. Bai, Y. C. Zhang, Y. J. Zhou, P. Chen, C. H. Wan, L. Han, W. X. Zhu, S. X. Liang, Y. C. Su, X. F. Han, F. Pan, and C. Song, Efficient spin-to-charge conversion via altermagnetic spin splitting effect in antiferromagnet ruo2, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [25]

    L. Han, X. Fu, R. Peng, X. Cheng, J. Dai, L. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Zhu, H. Bai, Y. Zhou, S. Liang, C. Chen, Q. Wang, X. Chen, L. Yang, Y. Zhang, C. Song, J. Liu, and F. Pan, Electrical 180°switching of néel vec- tor in spin-splitting antiferromagnet, Science Advances 10, eadn0479 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [26]

    González-Hernández, L.Smejkal, K

    R. González-Hernández, L.Smejkal, K. Výborný, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. c. v. Jungwirth, and J.Zelezný, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [27]

    Wan, W.Chen,and D

    L.-S.Liu, K.Shao, H.-D.Li, X. Wan, W.Chen,and D. Y. Xing, Altermagnetic spin precession and spin transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 106301 (2026)

    work page 2026

  27. [28]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin- orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 021016 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [29]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representa- tion theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [30]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic 7 orders, Phys. Rev. X14, 031039 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [31]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [32]

    Schiff, A

    H. Schiff, A. Corticelli, A. Guerreiro, J. Romhányi, and P. McClarty, The crystallographic spin point groups and their representations, SciPost Phys.18, 109 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [33]

    Sinova, and T

    L.Smejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [34]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Spontaneous antisymmetric spin splitting in noncollinear antiferro- magnets without spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B101, 220403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [35]

    P-wave magnets

    A. Birk Hellenes, T. Jungwirth, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. Chakraborty, J. Sinova, and L.Smejkal, P-wave mag- nets, arXiv:2309.01607

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [36]

    Luo, J.-X

    X.-J. Luo, J.-X. Hu, M. Hu, and K. T. Law, Spin Group Symmetry Criteria For Unconventional Mag- netism, arXiv:2603.07643 ()

    work page arXiv

  36. [37]

    M. Hu, X. Cheng, Z. Huang, and J. Liu, Catalog ofc- paired spin-momentum locking in antiferromagnetic sys- tems, Phys. Rev. X15, 021083 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [38]

    Y. Liu, X. Chen, Y. Yu, J. Etxebarria, J. M. Perez-Mato, and Q. Liu, Symmetry classification of magnetic orders using oriented spin space groups, Nature652, 869 (2026)

    work page 2026

  38. [39]

    Z. Song, Z. Qi, C. Fang, Z. Fang, and H. Weng, A Unified Symmetry Classification of Magnetic Orders via Spin Space Groups: Prediction of Coplanar Even-Wave Phases, arXiv:2512.08901 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [40]

    X. Chen, W. Chen, and Q. Liu, The rise of unconven- tional magnetism, arXiv:2603.27505 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [41]

    See the supplemental materials of symmetry properties of the spin textures and application to FePO4; the parity of the spin textures; a unified symmetry classification of even-, odd-, and hybrid-parity magnets; candidate mate- rials for hybrid- and unconstrained-parity magnets; spin transport response formalism; theoretical models, first- principle calcul...

    work page

  41. [42]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, I.Zutić, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric altermagnets: Antiferro- electricity alters magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [43]

    M. Gu, Y. Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y. Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switchable alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106802 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [44]

    Q. Song, S. Stavrić, P. Barone, A. Droghetti, D. S. An- tonenko, J. W. F. Venderbos, C. A. Occhialini, B. Ilyas, E. Ergeçen, N. Gedik, S.-W. Cheong, R. M. Fernandes, S. Picozzi, and R. Comin, Electrical switching of a p- wave magnet , Nature642, 64 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [45]

    Yamada, M

    R. Yamada, M. T. Birch, P. R. Baral, S. Okumura, R. Nakano, S. Gao, M. Ezawa, T. Nomoto, J. Masell, Y. Ishihara, K. K. Kolincio, I. Belopolski, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, K. Ohishi, T. Ohhara, R. Kiyanagi, T. Naka- jima, Y. Tokura, T.-h. Arima, Y. Motome, M. M. Hirschmann, and M. Hirschberger, A metallic p-wave magnet with commensurate spin helix, Nature646, ...

    work page 2025

  45. [46]

    M. Hu, O. Janson, C. Felser, P. McClarty, J. van den Brink, and M. G. Vergniory, Spin hall and edelstein ef- fects in chiral non-collinear altermagnets, Nature Com- munications16, 8529 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [47]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y. Yanase, Nonreciprocal transport and opticalphenomenainquantummaterials,AnnualReview of Condensed Matter Physics15, 63 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [48]

    Zhang, C

    J.Zelezný, Y. Zhang, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Spin- polarized current in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 187204 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [49]

    Kimata, H

    M. Kimata, H. Chen, K. Kondou, S. Sugimoto, P. K. Muduli, M. Ikhlas, Y. Omori, T. Tomita, A. H. Mac- Donald, S. Nakatsuji, and Y. Otani, Magnetic and mag- netic inverse spin hall effects in a non-collinear antiferro- magnet, Nature565, 627 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [50]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic an- tiferromagnets, Nature Communications10, 4305 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [51]

    Edelstein, Spin polarization of conduction electrons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmet- ric electron systems, Solid State Communications73, 233 (1990)

    V. Edelstein, Spin polarization of conduction electrons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmet- ric electron systems, Solid State Communications73, 233 (1990)

    work page 1990

  51. [52]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Na- ture Electronics5, 267 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [53]

    J. Lai, T. Yu, P. Liu, L. Liu, G. Xing, X.-Q. Chen, and Y. Sun,d-wave flat fermi surface in altermagnets enables maximum charge-to-spin conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 256702 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [54]

    Chakraborty, A

    A. Chakraborty, A. Birk Hellenes, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, T. Jungwirth, L.Smejkal, and J. Sinova, Highly efficient non-relativistic edelstein effect in nodal p-wave magnets, Nature Communications16, 7270 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [55]

    Rousse, J

    G. Rousse, J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, S. Patoux, and C. Masquelier, Magnetic structures of the triphylite lifepo4 and of its delithiated form fepo4, Chemistry of materials15, 4082 (2003)

    work page 2003

  55. [56]

    Manchon, J.Zelezný, I

    A. Manchon, J.Zelezný, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035004 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [57]

    H. Zhu, J. Li, X. Chen, Y. Yu, and Q. Liu, Magnetic ge- ometry induced quantum geometry and nonlinear trans- ports, Nature Communications16, 4882 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [58]

    Yoshida, J

    H. Yoshida, J. Priessnitz, L.Smejkal, and S. Murakami, Quantization of spin circular photogalvanic effect in altermagnetic weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 096701 (2026)

    work page 2026

  58. [59]

    Sivianes, F

    J. Sivianes, F. J. d. Santos, and J. Ibañez Azpiroz, Opti- cal signatures of spin symmetries in unconventional mag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 196907 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [60]

    Pei, R.-W

    F. Pei, R.-W. Zhang, L. Li, D. Li, and Y. Yao, Switch- able Giant Spin Injection Current in Janus Altermagnet Fe2SSeO, arXiv:2512.17315

    work page arXiv

  60. [61]

    Dong, J.-M

    S. Dong, J.-M. Liu, S.-W. Cheong, and Z. Ren, Multi- ferroic materials and magnetoelectric physics: symme- try, entanglement, excitation, and topology, Advances in Physics64, 519 (2015)

    work page 2015

  61. [62]

    Y. Yang, Z. Qian, R. Xiao, Y. Xu, H. Wang, S. Liu, and C. Wu, Electrical Regulation of Transverse Spin Currents in Unconventional Magnetic Ferroeletrics, arXiv:2601.01499 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  62. [63]

    Zhu, Z.-Y

    D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Topological superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic met- 8 als, Phys. Rev. B108, 184505 (2023)

    work page 2023

  63. [64]

    Zhang, L.-H

    S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Finite- momentum cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets, Nature Communications15, 1801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [65]

    Monkman, J

    K. Monkman, J. Weng, N. Heinsdorf, A. Nocera, Y. Bar- las, and M. Franz, Persistent spin currents in supercon- ducting altermagnets, Phys. Rev. X16, 011057 (2026)

    work page 2026

  65. [66]

    Luo, Z.-T

    X.-J. Luo, Z.-T. Sun, X. Feng, M. Tian, and K. T. Law, Hidden Zeeman Field in Odd-Parity Magnets: An Ideal Platform for Topological Superconductivity, arXiv:2603.15147 ()

    work page arXiv

  66. [67]

    Mixed-Parity Altermagnetism in Collinear Spin-Orbital Magnets

    Z. Zheng-Yang, H. Jin-Xin, Z. Song-Bo, H. Lun-Hui, and Z. Yan, Mixed-Parity Altermagnetism in Collinear Spin- Orbital Magnets, arXiv:2605.05205

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [68]

    R.-C. Xiao, Y. Jin, Z.-F. Zhang, Z.-H. Feng, D.-F. Shao, and M. Tian, Tensorsymmetry: a package to get symmetry-adapted tensors disentangling spin-orbit cou- pling effect and establishing analytical relationship with magneticorder,ComputerPhysicsCommunications318, 109872 (2026)

    work page 2026

  68. [69]

    Etxebarria, J

    J. Etxebarria, J. M. Perez-Mato, E. S. Tasci, and L. El- coro, Crystal tensor properties of magnetic materials withandwithoutspin–orbitcoupling.Applicationofspin point groups as approximate symmetries, Acta Crystal- lographica Section A81, 317 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [70]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996)

    work page 1996

  70. [71]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    work page 1996

  71. [72]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  72. [73]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    work page 1994

  73. [74]

    M.MethfesselandA.T.Paxton,High-precisionsampling for brillouin-zone integration in metals, Phys. Rev. B40, 3616 (1989)

    work page 1989

  74. [75]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- traandthestructuralstabilityofnickeloxide: Anlsda+u study, Phys. Rev. B57, 1505 (1998)

    work page 1998

  75. [76]

    Cococcioni and S

    M. Cococcioni and S. de Gironcoli, Linear response ap- proach to the calculation of the effective interaction pa- rameters in theLDA + Umethod, Phys. Rev. B71, 035105 (2005)

    work page 2005

  76. [77]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Blügel, F. Freimuth, G. Géranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Koretsune, J. Ibañez-Azpiroz, H. Lee, J.-M. Lihm, D. Marchand, A. Marrazzo, Y. Mokrousov, J. I. Mustafa, Y. Nohara, Y. Nomura, L. Paulatto, S. Poncé, T. Pon- weiser, J. Qiao, F. Thöle, S. S. Tsirkin, M. Wierzbowska, N. Marzari, D. Vanderbilt, I. Sou...

    work page 2020

  77. [78]

    Gall, Electron mean free path in elemental metals, Journal of Applied Physics119, 085101 (2016)

    D. Gall, Electron mean free path in elemental metals, Journal of Applied Physics119, 085101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  78. [79]

    S. K. Vasheghani Farahani, T. D. Veal, P. D. C. King, J. Zúñiga-Pérez, V. Muñoz-Sanjosé, and C. F. Mc- Conville, Electron mobility in cdo films, Journal of Ap- plied Physics109, 073712 (2011)

    work page 2011

  79. [80]

    Krishnaswamy, B

    K. Krishnaswamy, B. Himmetoglu, Y. Kang, A. Janotti, and C. G. Van de Walle, First-principles analysis of elec- trontransportinbasno 3,Phys.Rev.B95,205202(2017)

    work page 2017

  80. [81]

    F. Zhou, K. Kang, T. Maxisch, G. Ceder, and D. Mor- gan, The electronic structure and band gap of lifepo4 and limnpo4, Solid State Communications132, 181 (2004)

    work page 2004

Showing first 80 references.