pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21664 · v1 · pith:6JP4SJYDnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🪐 quant-ph

A journey through Flatland: What does the antiflatness of a spectrum teach us?

Barbara Jasser , Daniele Iannotti , Alioscia Hamma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 09:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords antiflatnessentanglement spectrumRényi entropy spreadescort distributionscapacity of entanglementquantum Fisher informationPareto frontierflatness-preserving operations
0
0 comments X

The pith

The capacity of entanglement equals the second derivative of the Kullback-Leibler divergence along the escort trajectory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes antiflatness as a way to quantify fluctuations in the entanglement spectrum that go beyond average purity or entanglement measures. It introduces antiflat majorization, ordered by the spread of Rényi entropies, because ordinary majorization cannot detect these fluctuations. From this ordering the authors define flatness-preserving operations and derive necessary conditions for when one quantum state can be converted into another. They then unify several antiflatness measures through escort distributions and Bregman divergences, proving that the capacity of entanglement is precisely the second derivative of the Kullback-Leibler divergence taken along the escort trajectory; this directly ties the quantity to the quantum Fisher information. Finally they show that the states of absolute maximal antiflatness form a continuous Pareto frontier of jump-spectrum states rather than any single universal state.

Core claim

We prove that the Capacity of Entanglement can be expressed as a second derivative of the Kullback-Leibler divergence along the escort trajectory, connecting it with the Quantum Fisher Information. Absolute maximal antiflatness is achieved by a continuous Pareto frontier of extremal states with jump spectra. Standard majorization is structurally blind to spectral fluctuations, therefore a new partial ordering based on Rényi entropy spread is required to obtain necessary conditions for convertibility under flatness-preserving operations.

What carries the argument

antiflat majorization, a partial ordering of spectra defined by the spread of their Rényi entropies, which generates the new class of flatness-preserving operations and the escort-trajectory representation of the capacity of entanglement

If this is right

  • New necessary conditions for state convertibility under flatness-preserving operations follow from the antiflat majorization partial order.
  • The capacity of entanglement, linear Rényi spread, and logarithmic antiflatness are all unified inside the escort-distribution and Bregman-divergence framework.
  • The capacity of entanglement is identical to the quantum Fisher information evaluated along the escort trajectory.
  • States of absolute maximal antiflatness form a continuous Pareto frontier of jump spectra rather than any single extremal state.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The escort-trajectory representation may supply a practical numerical route to compute the capacity of entanglement in larger systems where direct diagonalization is costly.
  • The Pareto frontier of jump spectra suggests that resource optimization tasks combining entanglement and magic will generally require a family of target states rather than one fixed optimum.
  • Because the construction relies only on the reduced density operator, the same antiflatness ordering could be applied to spectra arising in many-body localization or conformal field theory without reference to the full state.

Load-bearing premise

Standard majorization theory cannot detect fluctuations inside the spectrum, so a new ordering based on Rényi entropy spread is required to capture what flatness-preserving operations can do.

What would settle it

Compute the second derivative of the Kullback-Leibler divergence along the escort trajectory for a concrete two-qubit or three-qubit reduced density matrix and check whether it equals the independently calculated capacity of entanglement for that same matrix.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21664 by Alioscia Hamma, Barbara Jasser, Daniele Iannotti.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: On the left different profiles of the eigenvalues [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: R´enyi entropy curves Sα(ρA) for representative states in dA = 4 with spectra: Flat (0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25); State A (0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1); State B (0.7, 0.2, 0.08, 0.02); and State C (0.36, 0.34, 0.29, 0.01). FlatA states yield constant R´enyi curves, corresponding to vanishing R´enyi spread. The crossing between States A and C provides a visual indication that pointwise comparison of R´enyi entropies is … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Different measures of antiflatness, FA(ρ), log(Λρ), VA(ρ) and linear entanglement Elin(ρA) := 1 − Tr ρ 2 A  as a function of the Schimidt coefficient λ for the case of pure state in an Hilbert space of dimension d and dA = 2. The dots correspond to different maxima for each measure of antiflatness above: λ F max = 1 16 8 − 4 √ 2  , λ log(Λ) max = 1 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left. Probability density function of FA(ρ) for 2 qubits random pure states induced by the Haar measure, with the violet line representing the analytical result and the histogram depicting the numerical computation reasalized using Nsamples = 2 × 106 . Right. Probability density function of FA(ρ) for 2 qubits random pure states induced by the Bures probability distribution, with the violet line representin… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We explore the concept of antiflatness to characterize the structural fluctuations within the entanglement spectrum of a quantum state (i.e., the spectrum of its reduced density operator). As a measure of the interplay between entanglement and magic, two fundamental quantum resources, antiflatness provides second-order information about quantum correlations that standard average measures fail to capture. Recognizing that standard majorization theory fundamentally orders states by purity and is structurally blind to spectral fluctuations, we introduce a novel partial ordering known as antiflat majorization, based on the R\'enyi entropy spread. We define Flatness-Preserving Operations (FPOs), establishing new necessary conditions for state convertibility. Furthermore, we unify different measures of antiflatness-such as Capacity of Entanglement, Linear R\'enyi spread, and Logarithmic antiflatness-using the frameworks of escort distributions and Bregman divergences. We prove that the Capacity of Entanglement can be expressed as a second derivative of the Kullback-Leibler divergence along the escort trajectory, connecting it with the Quantum Fisher Information. Finally, we demonstrate that absolute maximal antiflatness is not achieved by a single universal state, but rather by a continuous Pareto frontier of extremal states with jump spectra, and we analyze the typicality of these spectral fluctuations using Haar, Bures-Hall and t-doped Clifford random state ensembles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This paper introduces the notion of antiflatness to quantify structural fluctuations in the entanglement spectrum of quantum states. It proposes a new partial ordering called antiflat majorization based on the spread of Rényi entropies to address limitations of standard majorization theory. The authors define Flatness-Preserving Operations (FPOs) and establish necessary conditions for state convertibility under these operations. They unify several antiflatness measures, including the Capacity of Entanglement, Linear Rényi spread, and Logarithmic antiflatness, through the use of escort distributions and Bregman divergences. A key result is the expression of the Capacity of Entanglement as the second derivative of the Kullback-Leibler divergence along the escort trajectory, which connects it to the Quantum Fisher Information. The paper concludes by showing that maximal antiflatness is achieved by a continuous Pareto frontier of extremal states with jump spectra and analyzes the typicality of these fluctuations using various random state ensembles.

Significance. Should the derivations hold, this work contributes to quantum resource theory by providing second-order information on quantum correlations that complements standard entanglement measures. The unification of antiflatness measures and the link to Quantum Fisher Information could facilitate new approaches in quantum information geometry. The concept of antiflat majorization and FPOs offers potential for characterizing convertibility in the presence of spectral fluctuations, which may have applications in understanding the interplay between magic and entanglement. The analysis of the Pareto frontier and ensemble typicality provides concrete examples and statistical insights into extremal cases.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states several proofs and unifications; including a brief outline of the key derivation steps in the main text would aid verification and accessibility.
  2. Clarify the definitions of 'escort trajectory' and 'jump spectra' upon first introduction to ensure readers unfamiliar with these terms can follow the arguments without ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and positive evaluation of our manuscript. The provided summary accurately captures the main ideas, including the definition of antiflatness, antiflat majorization, Flatness-Preserving Operations, the unification via escort distributions, the link between Capacity of Entanglement and Quantum Fisher Information, and the analysis of the Pareto frontier and ensemble typicality. We are pleased that the referee sees potential contributions to quantum resource theory and applications in quantum information geometry. Given that the report contains no specific major comments, we have no point-by-point responses below. We will incorporate minor revisions as appropriate in the next version of the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central derivations rely on standard mathematical identities from escort distributions, Bregman divergences, and majorization theory without reducing new quantities to self-referential definitions or fitted parameters. The expression of Capacity of Entanglement as the second derivative of KL divergence along the escort trajectory follows directly from established properties of these frameworks, and the connection to Quantum Fisher Information is a standard variance interpretation at the q=1 point rather than a constructed equivalence. Antiflat majorization is introduced as a novel partial order based on Rényi entropy spread to address limitations in standard majorization, with Flatness-Preserving Operations and the Pareto frontier of jump-spectrum states derived consistently from this ordering and ensemble typicality results. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renaming of known results as new derivations are present; the claims remain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard properties of Rényi entropies, majorization, escort distributions, and Bregman divergences, all drawn from prior literature; no new free parameters or invented physical entities are introduced beyond definitional constructs.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Rényi entropies and majorization order states by purity and are blind to higher-order spectral fluctuations
    Invoked to motivate the need for antiflat majorization
  • standard math Escort distributions and Bregman divergences provide a unifying framework for entropy-based measures
    Used to equate Capacity of Entanglement with a second derivative of KL divergence
invented entities (2)
  • Antiflat majorization no independent evidence
    purpose: Partial ordering that respects Rényi entropy spread for state convertibility
    Newly defined in the paper; no independent physical evidence supplied
  • Flatness-Preserving Operations (FPOs) no independent evidence
    purpose: Operations that preserve antiflatness properties
    Newly introduced class of operations; no independent evidence

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5775 in / 1578 out tokens · 36676 ms · 2026-05-22T09:12:27.659622+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quantum entanglement

    Ryszard Horodecki, Pawe l Horodecki, Micha l Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki. “Quantum entanglement”. Reviews of Modern Physics 81, 865–942 (2009)

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Colloquium: Area laws for the entan- glement entropy

    Jens Eisert, Marcus Cramer, and Martin B Plenio. “Colloquium: Area laws for the entan- glement entropy”. Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 277 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Entanglement in many- body systems

    Luigi Amico, Rosario Fazio, Andreas Osterloh, and Vlatko Vedral. “Entanglement in many- body systems”. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517–576 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum hall effect states

    Hui Li and F. D. M. Haldane. “Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum hall effect states”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 010504 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entan- glement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum hall effect states

    Hui Li and F. Duncan M. Haldane. “Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entan- glement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum hall effect states”. Physical Review Letters 101, 010504 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Entanglement spectrum of topological insulators and superconductors

    Lukasz Fidkowski. “Entanglement spectrum of topological insulators and superconductors”. Physical Review Letters 104, 130502 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension

    Frank Pollmann, Ari M Turner, Erez Berg, and Masaki Oshikawa. “Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension”. Physical Review B 81, 064439 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Entanglement spectrum in one-dimensional systems

    Pasquale Calabrese and Alexandre Lefevre. “Entanglement spectrum in one-dimensional systems”. Physical Review A 78, 032329 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Operator content of real-space entanglement spectra at conformal critical points

    Andreas M L¨ auchli. “Operator content of real-space entanglement spectra at conformal critical points” (2013). url: https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.0741

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    Two- component structure in the entanglement spectrum of highly excited states

    Zhi-Cheng Yang, Claudio Chamon, Alioscia Hamma, and Eduardo R Mucciolo. “Two- component structure in the entanglement spectrum of highly excited states”. Physical Review Letters 115, 267206 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Many-body localization and thermalization: Insights from the entanglement spectrum

    Scott D Geraedts, Rahul Nandkishore, and Nicolas Regnault. “Many-body localization and thermalization: Insights from the entanglement spectrum”. Physical Review B 93, 174202 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Aspects of capacity of entanglement

    Jan De Boer, Jarkko J¨ arvel¨ a, and Esko Keski-Vakkuri. “Aspects of capacity of entanglement”. Physical Review D 99, 066012 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox

    J. S. Bell. “On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox”. Physics Physique Fizika 1, 195– 200 (1964)

    work page 1964

  14. [14]

    On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics

    JOHN S. BELL. “On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics”. Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447–452 (1966)

    work page 1966

  15. [15]

    Upper bounds on entangling rates of bipartite hamiltonians

    Sergey Bravyi. “Upper bounds on entangling rates of bipartite hamiltonians”. Physical Review A 76, 052319 (2007). 22

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    Stabilizer R´ enyi Entropy

    Lorenzo Leone, Salvatore F. E. Oliviero, and Alioscia Hamma. “Stabilizer R´ enyi Entropy”. Physical Review Letters 128, 050402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    The Clifford group fails gracefully to be a unitary 4-design

    Huangjun Zhu, Richard Kueng, Markus Grassl, and David Gross. “The Clifford group fails gracefully to be a unitary 4-design” (2016). url: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.08172

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Application of a resource theory for magic states to fault-tolerant quantum computing

    Mark Howard and Earl Campbell. “Application of a resource theory for magic states to fault-tolerant quantum computing”. Physical Review Letters 118, 090501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Contextuality supplies the ’magic’ for quantum computation

    Mark Howard, Joel Wallman, Victor Veitch, and Joseph Emerson. “Contextuality supplies the ’magic’ for quantum computation”. Nature 510, 351–355 (2014)

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    Entanglement in the stabilizer formalism

    David Fattal, Toby S. Cubitt, Yoshihisa Yamamoto, Sergey Bravyi, and Isaac L. Chuang. “Entanglement in the stabilizer formalism” (2004). arXiv:quant-ph/0406168

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  21. [21]

    Ground state entanglement and geometric entropy in the kitaev model

    Alioscia Hamma, Radu Ionicioiu, and Paolo Zanardi. “Ground state entanglement and geometric entropy in the kitaev model”. Physics Letters A 337, 22–28 (2005)

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    The theory of quantum information

    John Watrous. “The theory of quantum information”. Cambridge university press. (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Quanti- fying nonstabilizerness through entanglement spectrum flatness

    Emanuele Tirrito, Poetri Sonya Tarabunga, Gugliemo Lami, Titas Chanda, Lorenzo Leone, Salvatore FE Oliviero, Marcello Dalmonte, Mario Collura, and Alioscia Hamma. “Quanti- fying nonstabilizerness through entanglement spectrum flatness”. Physical Review A 109, L040401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Magic-induced computational separation in entanglement theory

    Andi Gu, Salvatore FE Oliviero, and Lorenzo Leone. “Magic-induced computational sepa- ration in entanglement theory” (2024). url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19610

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Gravitational back-reaction is the holographic dual of magic

    ChunJun Cao, Gong Cheng, Alioscia Hamma, Lorenzo Leone, William Munizzi, and Sava- tore FE Oliviero. “Gravitational back-reaction is the holographic dual of magic” (2024). url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07056

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Stabilizer entropy and entanglement complexity in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model

    Barbara Jasser, Jovan Odavi´ c, and Alioscia Hamma. “Stabilizer entropy and entanglement complexity in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model”. Physical Review B (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Viscardi, M

    Michele Viscardi, Marcello Dalmonte, Alioscia Hamma, and Emanuele Tirrito. “Interplay of entanglement structures and stabilizer entropy in spin models” (2025). arXiv:2503.08620

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Non-Local Magic Resources for Fermionic Gaussian States

    Daniele Iannotti, Beatrice Magni, Riccardo Cioli, Alioscia Hamma, and Xhek Turkeshi. “Non-local magic resources for fermionic gaussian states” (2026). arXiv:2604.27049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Quantum Complexity and New Directions in Nuclear Physics and High-Energy Physics Phenomenology

    Caroline E. P. Robin and Martin J. Savage. “Quantum complexity and new directions in nuclear physics and high-energy physics phenomenology” (2026). arXiv:2604.26376

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Anti-flatness and non-local magic in two-particle scattering processes

    C. E. P. Robin and M. J. Savage. “Anti-flatness and non-local magic in two-particle scattering processes” (2025). arXiv:2510.23426

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    The nonlocal magic of a holographic Schwinger pair

    Sebastian Grieninger. “The nonlocal magic of a holographic Schwinger pair” (2026). arXiv:2605.04210

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Non-Clifford Cost of Random Unitaries

    Lorenzo Leone, Salvatore F. E. Oliviero, Alioscia Hamma, Jens Eisert, and Lennart Bittel. “The non-Clifford cost of random unitaries” (2025). arXiv:2505.10110

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Quantum resource theories

    Eric Chitambar and Gilad Gour. “Quantum resource theories”. Reviews of modern physics 91, 025001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Resources of the quantum world

    Gilad Gour. “Resources of the quantum world” (2024). url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402. 05474

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    The second laws of quantum thermodynamics

    Fernando G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, Micha l Horodecki, Nelly H. Y. Ng, Jonathan Oppenheim, and Stephanie Wehner. “The second laws of quantum thermodynamics”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 3275–3279 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Fundamental work cost of quantum processes

    Philippe Faist and Renato Renner. “Fundamental work cost of quantum processes”. Physical Review X 8, 021011 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics

    Sandu Popescu, Anthony J. Short, and Andreas Winter. “Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics”. Nature Physics 2, 754–758 (2006). 23

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    Topological entanglement r´ enyi entropy and reduced density matrix structure

    Steven T. Flammia, Alioscia Hamma, Taylor L. Hughes, and Xiao-Gang Wen. “Topological entanglement r´ enyi entropy and reduced density matrix structure”. Physical Review Letters 103, 261601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Stability of topological purity under random local unitaries

    Salvatore F. E. Oliviero, Lorenzo Leone, You Zhou, and Alioscia Hamma. “Stability of topological purity under random local unitaries”. SciPost Physics 12, 096 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Lo- cal characterization of one-dimensional topologically ordered states

    Jian Cui, Luigi Amico, Heng Fan, Mile Gu, Alioscia Hamma, and Vlatko Vedral. “Lo- cal characterization of one-dimensional topologically ordered states”. Phys. Rev. B 88, 125117 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Lo- cal response of topological order to an external perturbation

    Alioscia Hamma, Lukasz Cincio, Siddhartha Santra, Paolo Zanardi, and Luigi Amico. “Lo- cal response of topological order to an external perturbation”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 210602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    Communication cost of entanglement transforma- tions

    Patrick Hayden and Andreas Winter. “Communication cost of entanglement transforma- tions”. Physical Review A 67, 012326 (2003)

    work page 2003

  43. [43]

    Renyi-entropic bounds on quantum communication

    Wim van Dam and Patrick Hayden. “Renyi-entropic bounds on quantum communica- tion” (2002). arXiv:quant-ph/0204093

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  44. [44]

    Conditions for a class of entanglement transformations

    Michael A. Nielsen. “Conditions for a class of entanglement transformations”. Physical Review Letters 83, 436–439 (1999)

    work page 1999

  45. [45]

    Source and accessible entanglement of few-body systems

    D. Sauerwein, M. Cuquet, J. I. de Vicente, and B. Kraus. “Source and accessible entanglement of few-body systems”. Physical Review A 92, 062340 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Complexity as thermodynamic depth

    Seth Lloyd and Heinz Pagels. “Complexity as thermodynamic depth”. Annals of Physics 188, 186–213 (1988)

    work page 1988

  47. [47]

    The axiomatic and operational ap- proaches to resource theories of magic do not coincide

    Arne Heimendahl, Felipe Heinrich, and David Gross. “The axiomatic and operational ap- proaches to resource theories of magic do not coincide”. Journal of Mathematical Physics 63, 112201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Entanglement entropy and entanglement spectrum of the kitaev model

    Hong Yao and Xiao-Liang Qi. “Entanglement entropy and entanglement spectrum of the kitaev model”. Physical review letters 105, 080501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    Entanglement spectrum and entanglement thermodynamics of quantum hall bilayers at ν= 1

    John Schliemann. “Entanglement spectrum and entanglement thermodynamics of quantum hall bilayers at ν= 1”. Physical Review B 83, 115322 (2011)

    work page 2011

  50. [50]

    Average capacity of quantum entanglement

    Lu Wei. “Average capacity of quantum entanglement”. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 56, 015302 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Capacity of entanglement in random pure state

    Kazumi Okuyama. “Capacity of entanglement in random pure state”. Physics Letters B 820, 136600 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Entanglement capacity of fermionic gaussian states

    Youyi Huang and Lu Wei. “Entanglement capacity of fermionic gaussian states”. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 56, 435201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Capacity of entanglement for a nonlocal hamiltonian

    Divyansh Shrimali, Swapnil Bhowmick, Vivek Pandey, and Arun Kumar Pati. “Capacity of entanglement for a nonlocal hamiltonian”. Physical Review A 106 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Eigenstate capacity and page curve in fermionic gaussian states

    Budhaditya Bhattacharjee, Pratik Nandy, and Tanay Pathak. “Eigenstate capacity and page curve in fermionic gaussian states”. Physical Review B 104 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Spacetime Fluctuations in AdS/CFT

    Erik Verlinde and Kathryn M. Zurek. “Spacetime Fluctuations in AdS/CFT”. JHEP 04, 209 (2020). arXiv:1911.02018

    work page arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Variance of relative surprisal as single-shot quantifier

    Paul Boes, Nelly HY Ng, and Henrik Wilming. “Variance of relative surprisal as single-shot quantifier”. PRX Quantum 3, 010325 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from the anti–de sitter space/conformal field theory correspondence

    Shinsei Ryu and Tadashi Takayanagi. “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from the anti–de sitter space/conformal field theory correspondence”. Physical Review Let- ters96 (2006)

    work page 2006

  58. [58]

    A holographic proof of r´ enyi entropic inequalities

    Yuki Nakaguchi and Tatsuma Nishioka. “A holographic proof of r´ enyi entropic inequalities”. Journal of High Energy Physics 2016 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    The gravity dual of r´ enyi entropy

    Xi Dong. “The gravity dual of r´ enyi entropy”. Nature Communications7 (2016). 24

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    Tight bound on relative entropy by entropy difference

    David Reeb and Michael M Wolf. “Tight bound on relative entropy by entropy difference”. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 61, 1458–1473 (2015)

    work page 2015

  61. [61]

    Possible generalization of boltzmann-gibbs statistics

    Constantino Tsallis. “Possible generalization of boltzmann-gibbs statistics”. Journal of Statistical Physics 52, 479–487 (1988)

    work page 1988

  62. [62]

    Information geometry and its applications

    Shun-ichi Amari. “Information geometry and its applications”. Volume 194 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer. (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    Direct determination of the f(α) singularity spectrum

    Ashvin Chhabra and Roderick V. Jensen. “Direct determination of the f(α) singularity spectrum”. Physical Review Letters 62, 1327 (1989)

    work page 1989

  64. [64]

    Thermodynamics of chaotic systems: an introduction

    Christian Beck and Friedrich Sch¨ ogl. “Thermodynamics of chaotic systems: an introduction”. Cambridge University Press. (1993)

    work page 1993

  65. [65]

    The role of constraints within generalized nonextensive statistics

    Constantino Tsallis, Renio S. Mendes, and Angel R. Plastino. “The role of constraints within generalized nonextensive statistics”. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 261, 534–554 (1998)

    work page 1998

  66. [66]

    Introduction to nonextensive statistical mechanics: Approaching a complex world

    Constantino Tsallis. “Introduction to nonextensive statistical mechanics: Approaching a complex world”. Springer. (2009). 1 edition

    work page 2009

  67. [67]

    Geometry of escort distributions

    Sumiyoshi Abe. “Geometry of escort distributions”. Physical Review E 68, 031101 (2003)

    work page 2003

  68. [68]

    Information theory and statistical mechanics

    E. T. Jaynes. “Information theory and statistical mechanics”. Phys. Rev. 106, 620– 630 (1957)

    work page 1957

  69. [69]

    Local quantum physics: Fields, particles, algebras

    Rudolf Haag. “Local quantum physics: Fields, particles, algebras”. Theoretical and Mathe- matical Physics. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. (1996). 2 edition

    work page 1996

  70. [70]

    The relaxation method of finding the common point of convex sets and its application to the solution of problems in convex programming

    Lev M Bregman. “The relaxation method of finding the common point of convex sets and its application to the solution of problems in convex programming”. USSR computational mathematics and mathematical physics 7, 200–217 (1967)

    work page 1967

  71. [71]

    Quantum fisher information matrices from r´ enyi relative entropies

    Mark M. Wilde. “Quantum fisher information matrices from r´ enyi relative entropies” (2025). arXiv:2510.02218

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Statistical decision rules and optimal inference

    N. N. Chentsov. “Statistical decision rules and optimal inference”. American Mathematical Society. (1982)

    work page 1982

  73. [73]

    Monotone metrics on matrix spaces

    D´ enes Petz. “Monotone metrics on matrix spaces”. Linear algebra and its applications 244, 81–96 (1996)

    work page 1996

  74. [74]

    Conditional expectation in an operator algebra. iv. entropy and infor- mation

    Hisaharu Umegaki. “Conditional expectation in an operator algebra. iv. entropy and infor- mation”. Kodai Mathematical Seminar Reports 14, 59–85 (1962)

    work page 1962

  75. [75]

    Statistical distance and the geometry of quan- tum states

    Samuel L Braunstein and Carlton M Caves. “Statistical distance and the geometry of quan- tum states”. Physical Review Letters 72, 3439 (1994)

    work page 1994

  76. [76]

    Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions

    Hartmut H¨ affner, Wolfgang H¨ ansel, Christian F Roos, Jan Benhelm, D Chek-al kar, Michael Chwalla, Thomas K¨ orber, UD Rapol, Mark Riebe, PO Schmidt, et al. “Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions”. Nature 438, 643–646 (2005)

    work page 2005

  77. [77]

    Direct estimations of linear and nonlinear functionals of a density matrix

    Artur Ekert, Carolina Moura Alves, Daniel K. L. Oi, Micha l Horodecki, Pawe l Horodecki, and Leong Chuan Kwek. “Direct estimations of linear and nonlinear functionals of a density matrix”. Physical Review Letters 88, 217901 (2002)

    work page 2002

  78. [78]

    Measuring entanglement growth in quench dynamics of bosons in an optical lattice

    Andrew J Daley, Hannes Pichler, Johannes Schachenmayer, and Peter Zoller. “Measuring entanglement growth in quench dynamics of bosons in an optical lattice”. Physical Review Letters 109, 020505 (2012)

    work page 2012

  79. [79]

    Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements

    Hsin-Yuan Huang, Richard Kueng, and John Preskill. “Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements”. Nature Physics 16, 1050–1057 (2020)

    work page 2020

  80. [80]

    The randomized measurement toolbox

    Andreas Elben, Steven T Flammia, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Richard Kueng, John Preskill, Benoˆ ıt Vermersch, and Peter Zoller. “The randomized measurement toolbox”. Nature Reviews Physics 5, 9–24 (2023)

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.