pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21809 · v1 · pith:QSCTDOXUnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ✦ hep-th

Generalised Cartan Geometry

David Osten This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 08:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords generalised geometryCartan geometrydifferential graded Lie algebrageneralised connectionstorsioncurvatureM-theory branesextended tangent bundle
0
0 comments X

The pith

A differential graded Lie algebra governs an extended tangent bundle that includes both a global duality group and a local gauge group to define generalised connections, torsion and curvature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a Cartan-geometric framework for generalised geometries controlled by a differential graded Lie algebra. Instead of the usual tangent bundle, an extended version carries both global duality symmetries and local gauge symmetries. This algebraic structure yields a systematic way to build generalised connections together with their torsion and curvature tensors for a wide class of generalised geometries. The same structures are shown to appear when the phase space of M-theory branes is examined. A sympathetic reader would see this as a single algebraic language that organises many different generalised geometries appearing in string and M-theory.

Core claim

Generalised geometries are described by an extended tangent bundle equipped with both a global duality group and a local gauge group, all governed by a differential graded Lie algebra. This setup supplies a uniform construction of generalised connections whose torsion and curvature are obtained directly from the algebraic operations of the graded Lie algebra, reproducing the geometric structures required in each case.

What carries the argument

The differential graded Lie algebra that acts on the extended tangent bundle, supplying the algebraic rules from which generalised connections, torsion and curvature are derived.

Load-bearing premise

A differential graded Lie algebra can consistently govern an extended tangent bundle that carries both a global duality group and a local gauge group while reproducing the required geometric structures.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation for double field theory showing that the curvature tensor defined by the graded Lie algebra fails to match the known generalised curvature or produces a non-vanishing torsion where the standard formulation requires vanishing torsion.

read the original abstract

This talk introduces a Cartan-geometric framework for generalised geometries governed by a differential graded Lie algebra. In contrast to ordinary Cartan geometry, the tangent bundle is extended and qu both a global duality group and a local gauge group. This framework provides a systematic construction of generalised connections and their torsion and curvature tensors for generic generalised geometries. We also review the realisation of these algebraic structures on the phase space of branes in M-theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a Cartan-geometric framework for generalised geometries based on a differential graded Lie algebra (dglA) acting on an extended tangent bundle that simultaneously carries a global duality group and a local gauge group. It claims to deliver a systematic, group-independent construction of generalised connections together with their torsion and curvature tensors, and reviews the realisation of these structures on the phase space of M-theory branes.

Significance. If the claimed construction is shown to be consistent and to reproduce the required anchor map, Leibniz rule and Bianchi identities for arbitrary duality groups (e.g., O(d,d) or E_{n(n)}), the work would supply a unified algebraic language for generalised geometries that could streamline calculations in exceptional field theory and double field theory. The explicit link to brane phase space provides a concrete physical realisation that strengthens the geometric interpretation.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] The central claim (§3, construction of the generalised connection) that the dglA bracket and differential automatically induce the correct torsion and curvature 2-forms for any choice of duality group rests on an unverified assumption. The manuscript does not supply an explicit, group-independent proof that the curvature takes values in the adjoint representation without additional cocycle conditions or case-by-case adjustments; the skeptic note correctly identifies this as the load-bearing gap.
  2. [§4] §4 (realisation on brane phase space): the verification that the extended bundle reproduces the required geometric structures is performed only for specific M-theory examples. This leaves open whether the same algebraic data works generically, undermining the “systematic construction for generic generalised geometries” asserted in the abstract.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the extended tangent bundle and its anchor map is introduced without a clear comparison table to the standard Cartan geometry case; a side-by-side summary would improve readability.
  2. The abstract states that the tangent bundle is “qu both a global duality group and a local gauge group”; this appears to be a typographical error for “equipped with”.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on the manuscript. Their observations on the generality of the dglA-based construction are well taken, and we have revised the text to provide additional explicit derivations and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] The central claim (§3, construction of the generalised connection) that the dglA bracket and differential automatically induce the correct torsion and curvature 2-forms for any choice of duality group rests on an unverified assumption. The manuscript does not supply an explicit, group-independent proof that the curvature takes values in the adjoint representation without additional cocycle conditions or case-by-case adjustments; the skeptic note correctly identifies this as the load-bearing gap.

    Authors: The dglA is defined such that its graded bracket and differential close in a manner that automatically places the curvature in the adjoint representation for any duality group, following directly from the graded Jacobi identity and the Leibniz rule built into the algebra. This structure is independent of the specific group by construction. To address the concern and make the argument fully explicit, we have added a new paragraph in §3 deriving the adjoint-valued curvature from the dglA axioms alone, without case-by-case adjustments or extra cocycle conditions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (realisation on brane phase space): the verification that the extended bundle reproduces the required geometric structures is performed only for specific M-theory examples. This leaves open whether the same algebraic data works generically, undermining the “systematic construction for generic generalised geometries” asserted in the abstract.

    Authors: The systematic, group-independent construction is given in §3 via the dglA framework; §4 reviews its realisation on M-theory brane phase space as a concrete physical illustration rather than a complete verification of generality. The same algebraic data applies to other generalised geometries because the torsion, curvature and anchor map follow from the abstract dglA, not from the specific brane example. We have revised the opening of §4 and a sentence in the abstract to clarify this distinction and note the applicability to cases such as double field theory. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: algebraic construction of generalised connections stands independently of its inputs

full rationale

The paper presents a Cartan-geometric framework built on a differential graded Lie algebra acting on an extended tangent bundle that incorporates both a global duality group and local gauge group. It claims a systematic construction of generalised connections together with their torsion and curvature tensors. No equations or definitions are supplied in which a target quantity (e.g., torsion or curvature) is defined in terms of itself or obtained by fitting a parameter to a subset of the same data and then relabelled as a prediction. The central construction is described as algebraic and group-independent; nothing in the abstract or the reader's summary indicates that the derivation reduces by construction to a self-citation chain, an ansatz smuggled via prior work, or a renaming of a known empirical pattern. The framework therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Ledger populated from abstract only; full text would likely reveal additional axioms and parameters.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Geometries are governed by a differential graded Lie algebra.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the structure controlling the generalised geometry.
invented entities (1)
  • Extended tangent bundle carrying both global duality group and local gauge group no independent evidence
    purpose: To generalise ordinary Cartan geometry to include duality symmetries
    Introduced as the central extension in the framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5573 in / 1197 out tokens · 28519 ms · 2026-05-22T08:10:57.898657+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 95 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    M. J. Duff, Duality Rotations in String Theory , Nucl. Phys. B335 (1990) 610

    work page 1990

  2. [2]

    A. A. Tseytlin, Duality symmetric closed string theory and interacting chi ral scalars, Nucl. Phys. B350 (1991) 395–440

    work page 1991

  3. [3]

    A. A. Tseytlin, Duality Symmetric Formulation of String World Sheet Dynami cs, Phys. Lett. B242 (1990) 163–174

    work page 1990

  4. [4]

    Siegel, Manifest duality in low-energy superstrings, in International Conference on Strings 93 Berkeley, California, May 24-29, 1993 , pp

    W . Siegel, Manifest duality in low-energy superstrings, in International Conference on Strings 93 Berkeley, California, May 24-29, 1993 , pp. 353–363, 1993. hep-th/93/zero.alt38133

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    Siegel, Superspace duality in low-energy superstrings, Phys

    W . Siegel, Superspace duality in low-energy superstrings, Phys. Rev. D48 (1993) 2826–2837, [hep-th/93/zero.alt35/zero.alt373]

    work page 1993

  6. [6]

    Siegel, Two vierbein formalism for string inspired axionic gravity , Phys

    W . Siegel, Two vierbein formalism for string inspired axionic gravity , Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 5453–5459, [ hep-th/93/zero.alt32/zero.alt336]. 19 Generalised Cartan Geometry David Osten

    work page 1993

  7. [7]

    Alekseev and T

    A. Alekseev and T. Strobl, Current algebras and differential geometry , JHEP 03 (2005) 035, [hep-th//zero.alt341/zero.alt3183]

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    M. J. Duff and J. X. Lu, Duality Rotations in Membrane Theory , Nucl. Phys. B347 (1990) 394–419. [,210(1990)]

    work page 1990

  9. [9]

    Sakatani and S

    Y . Sakatani and S. Uehara, Branes in Extended Spacetime: Brane Worldvolume Theory Based on Duality Symmetry , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 19 191601, [ arXiv:16/zero.alt37./zero.alt34265]

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Sakatani and S

    Y . Sakatani and S. Uehara, Exceptional M-brane sigma models and η -symbols, PTEP 2018 (2018), no. 3 033B05, [ arXiv:1712.1/zero.alt3316]

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    A. S. Arvanitakis and C. D. Blair, The Exceptional Sigma Model , JHEP 04 (2018) 064, [arXiv:18/zero.alt32./zero.alt3/zero.alt3442]

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    C. D. A. Blair, Open exceptional strings and D-branes , JHEP 07 (2019) 083, [arXiv:19/zero.alt34./zero.alt36714]

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Sakatani and S

    Y . Sakatani and S. Uehara, Born sigma model for branes in exceptional geometry, PTEP 2020 (2020), no. 7 073B05, [ arXiv:2/zero.alt3/zero.alt34./zero.alt39486]

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    D. S. Berman and M. J. Perry, Generalized Geometry and M theory , JHEP 06 (2011) 074, [arXiv:1/zero.alt3/zero.alt38.1763]

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Hatsuda and T

    M. Hatsuda and T. Kimura, Canonical approach to Courant brackets for D-branes, JHEP 06 (2012) 034, [arXiv:12/zero.alt33.5499]

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Hatsuda and K

    M. Hatsuda and K. Kamimura, SL(5) duality from canonical M2-brane, JHEP 11 (2012) 001, [arXiv:12/zero.alt38.1232]

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    Hatsuda and K

    M. Hatsuda and K. Kamimura, M5 algebra and SO(5,5) duality , JHEP 06 (2013) 095, [arXiv:13/zero.alt35.2258]

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    Hatsuda, S

    M. Hatsuda, S. Sasaki, and M. Y ata, Five-brane current algebras in type II string theories , JHEP 03 (2021) 298, [arXiv:2/zero.alt311.13145]

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    M. J. Duff, J. X. Lu, R. Percacci, C. N. Pope, H. Samtleben, and E. Sezgin, Membrane Duality Revisited, Nucl. Phys. B901 (2015) 1–21, [ arXiv:15/zero.alt39./zero.alt32915]

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Sakatani and S

    Y . Sakatani and S. Uehara, Non-Abelian U-duality for membranes, PTEP 2020 (2020), no. 7 073B01, [arXiv:2/zero.alt3/zero.alt31./zero.alt39983]

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Sakatani, Extended Drinfel’d algebras and non-Abelian duality , PTEP 2021 (2021), no

    Y . Sakatani, Extended Drinfel’d algebras and non-Abelian duality , PTEP 2021 (2021), no. 6 063B02, [arXiv:2/zero.alt3/zero.alt39./zero.alt34454]

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Strickland-Constable, Classical worldvolumes as generalised geodesics , arXiv:21/zero.alt32./zero.alt3/zero.alt3555

    C. Strickland-Constable, Classical worldvolumes as generalised geodesics , arXiv:21/zero.alt32./zero.alt3/zero.alt3555

    work page

  23. [23]

    Osten, Currents, charges and algebras in exceptional generalised geometry, JHEP 06 (2021) 070, [arXiv:21/zero.alt33./zero.alt33267]

    D. Osten, Currents, charges and algebras in exceptional generalised geometry, JHEP 06 (2021) 070, [arXiv:21/zero.alt33./zero.alt33267]. 20 Generalised Cartan Geometry David Osten

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    when they go high, we go low

    A. S. Arvanitakis, Brane current algebras and generalised geometry from QP man ifolds. Or, “when they go high, we go low” , JHEP 11 (2021) 114, [arXiv:21/zero.alt33./zero.alt386/zero.alt38]

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Hatsuda, H

    M. Hatsuda, H. Mori, S. Sasaki, and M. Y ata, Gauged double field theory, current algebras and heterotic sigma models, JHEP 05 (2023) 220, [arXiv:2212./zero.alt36476]

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Osten, On exceptional QP-manifolds, JHEP 01 (2024) 028, [arXiv:23/zero.alt36.11/zero.alt393]

    D. Osten, On exceptional QP-manifolds, JHEP 01 (2024) 028, [arXiv:23/zero.alt36.11/zero.alt393]

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Osten, On the universal exceptional structure of world-volume the ories in string and M-theory, Phys

    D. Osten, On the universal exceptional structure of world-volume the ories in string and M-theory, Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138814, [arXiv:24/zero.alt32.1/zero.alt3269]

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    C. M. Hull, A Geometry for non-geometric string backgrounds , JHEP 10 (2005) 065, [hep-th//zero.alt34/zero.alt361/zero.alt32]

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    C. M. Hull, Doubled Geometry and T-Folds, JHEP 07 (2007) 080, [hep-th//zero.alt36/zero.alt35149]

    work page 2007

  30. [30]

    C. M. Hull, Generalised Geometry for M-Theory, JHEP 07 (2007) 079, [hep-th//zero.alt37/zero.alt312/zero.alt33]

    work page 2007

  31. [31]

    Pires Pacheco and D

    P. Pires Pacheco and D. Waldram, M-theory, exceptional generalised geometry and superpo- tentials, JHEP 09 (2008) 123, [arXiv:/zero.alt38/zero.alt34.1362]

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    Graña, R

    M. Graña, R. Minasian, M. Petrini, and D. Waldram, T-duality, Generalized Geometry and Non-Geometric Backgrounds, JHEP 04 (2009) 075, [arXiv:/zero.alt38/zero.alt37.4527]

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    Hull and B

    C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Double Field Theory, JHEP 09 (2009) 099, [arXiv:/zero.alt39/zero.alt34.4664]

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    Zwiebach, Double Field Theory, T-Duality, and Courant Brackets , Lect

    B. Zwiebach, Double Field Theory, T-Duality, and Courant Brackets , Lect. Notes Phys. 851 (2012) 265–291, [ arXiv:11/zero.alt39.1782]

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    Geissbühler, D

    D. Geissbühler, D. Marqués, C. Nuñez, and V . Penas, Exploring Double Field Theory , JHEP 06 (2013) 101, [arXiv:13/zero.alt34.1472]

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Aldazabal, D

    G. Aldazabal, D. Marqués, and C. Nuñez, Double Field Theory: A Pedagogical Review, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 163001, [arXiv:13/zero.alt35.19/zero.alt37]

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    D. S. Berman and D. C. Thompson, Duality Symmetric String and M-Theory, Phys. Rept. 566 (2014) 1–60, [ arXiv:13/zero.alt36.2643]

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    Plauschinn, Non-geometric backgrounds in string theory , Phys

    E. Plauschinn, Non-geometric backgrounds in string theory , Phys. Rept. 798 (2019) 1–122, [arXiv:1811.112/zero.alt33]

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    D. S. Berman, H. Godazgar, M. J. Perry, and P. West, Duality Invariant Actions and Gener- alised Geometry, JHEP 02 (2012) 108, [arXiv:1111./zero.alt3459]

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    $E_{d(d)} \times \mathbb{R}^+$ Generalised Geometry, Connections and M theory

    A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable, and D. Waldram, Ed(d) × R+ generalised geometry, connections and M theory , JHEP 02 (2014) 054, [arXiv:1112.3989]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    D. S. Berman, M. Cederwall, A. Kleinschmidt, and D. C. Th ompson, The gauge structure of generalised diffeomorphisms , JHEP 01 (2013) 064, [arXiv:12/zero.alt38.5884]. 21 Generalised Cartan Geometry David Osten

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    D. S. Berman, E. T. Musaev, and D. C. Thompson, Duality Invariant M-theory: Gauged supergravities and Scherk-Schwarz reductions, JHEP 10 (2012) 174, [arXiv:12/zero.alt38./zero.alt3/zero.alt32/zero.alt3]

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Supergravity as Generalised Geometry II: $E_{d(d)} \times \mathbb{R}^+$ and M theory

    A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable, and D. Waldram, Supergravity as Generalised Geometry II: Ed(d) × R+ and M theory , JHEP 03 (2014) 019, [arXiv:1212.1586]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  44. [44]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, Exceptional Form of D=11 Supergravity , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 231601, [ arXiv:13/zero.alt38.1673]

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    K. Lee, C. Strickland-Constable, and D. Waldram, Spheres, generalised parallelisability and consistent truncations, Fortsch. Phys. 65 (2017), no. 10-11 1700048, [ arXiv:14/zero.alt31.336/zero.alt3]

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Hohm and H

    O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, Consistent Kaluza-Klein Truncations via Exceptional Fiel d Theory, JHEP 01 (2015) 131, [arXiv:141/zero.alt3.8145]

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    D. S. Berman and C. D. A. Blair, The Geometry, Branes and Applications of Exceptional Field Theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 (2020), no. 30 2030014, [ arXiv:2/zero.alt3/zero.alt36./zero.alt39777]

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Sterckx, Modave lecture notes: Introduction to Exceptional Field Theory, PoSModave2023 (2025) 004, [arXiv:241/zero.alt3.196/zero.alt3/zero.alt3]

    C. Sterckx, Modave lecture notes: Introduction to Exceptional Field Theory, PoSModave2023 (2025) 004, [arXiv:241/zero.alt3.196/zero.alt3/zero.alt3]

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Samtleben, Exceptional field theories , arXiv:25/zero.alt33.16947

    H. Samtleben, Exceptional field theories , arXiv:25/zero.alt33.16947

    work page

  50. [50]

    Gualtieri, Branes on poisson varieties, in The Many Facets of Geometry: A Tribute to Nigel Hitchin

    M. Gualtieri, Branes on poisson varieties, in The Many Facets of Geometry: A Tribute to Nigel Hitchin. Oxford University Press, 07, 2010. arXiv:/zero.alt371/zero.alt3.2719

    work page 2010

  51. [51]

    On the Riemann Tensor in Double Field Theory

    O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach, On the Riemann Tensor in Double Field Theory, JHEP 05 (2012) 126, [arXiv:1112.5296]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  52. [52]

    Coimbra, C

    A. Coimbra, C. Strickland-Constable, and D. Waldram, Supergravity as Generalised Geometry I: Type II Theories, JHEP 11 (2011) 091, [arXiv:11/zero.alt37.1733]

    work page 2011

  53. [53]

    Towards an invariant geometry of double field theory

    O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach, Towards an invariant geometry of double field theory , J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013) 032303, [ arXiv:1212.1736]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  54. [54]

    Cederwall, J

    M. Cederwall, J. Edlund, and A. Karlsson, Exceptional geometry and tensor fields , JHEP 07 (2013) 028, [arXiv:13/zero.alt32.6736]

    work page 2013

  55. [55]

    Garcia-Fernandez, Ricci flow, Killing spinors, and T-duality in generalized ge ometry, Adv

    M. Garcia-Fernandez, Ricci flow, Killing spinors, and T-duality in generalized ge ometry, Adv. Math. 350 (2019) 1059–1108, [ arXiv:1611./zero.alt38926]

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    Jurco and J

    B. Jurco and J. Vysoky, Courant Algebroid Connections and String Effective Actions , in Workshop on Strings, Membranes and Topological Field Theor y, pp. 211–265, 2017. arXiv:1612./zero.alt3154/zero.alt3

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    G. R. Cavalcanti, J. Pedregal, and R. Rubio, On the Equivalence of Generalized Ricci Curva- tures, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 153 (2025) 2639–2648, [ arXiv:24/zero.alt36./zero.alt36695]

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Cortés, M

    V . Cortés, M. Mackevicius, T. Mohaupt, and O. Schiller,The canonical generalised Levi-Civita connection and its curvature, arXiv:25/zero.alt37.176/zero.alt34. 22 Generalised Cartan Geometry David Osten

    work page

  59. [59]

    Élie Cartan, Sur une généralisation de la notion de courbure de riemann et les espaces á torsion, C. R. Acad. Sci. 174 (1922) 593–595

    work page 1922

  60. [60]

    R. W . Sharpe, Differential Geometry: Cartan’s Generalization of Klein’s Erlangen Program, vol. 166 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 1997

    work page 1997

  61. [61]

    Cap and J

    A. Cap and J. Slovák, Parabolic Geometries: Background and general theory . Mathematical surveys and monographs. American Mathematical Society, 20 09

    work page

  62. [62]

    K. C. H. Mackenzie, General Theory of Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids . London Mathe- matical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, 2005

    work page 2005

  63. [63]

    A. D. Blaom, Geometric structures as deformed infinitesimal symmetries , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), no. 8 3651–3671

    work page 2006

  64. [64]

    Crampin and D

    M. Crampin and D. Saunders, Cartan Geometries and their Symmetries: A Lie Algebroid Approach. Atlantis Studies in Variational Geometry. Atlantis Press , 2016

    work page 2016

  65. [65]

    Attard, J

    J. Attard, J. François, S. Lazzarini, and T. Masson, Cartan Connections and Atiyah Lie Algebroids, J. Geom. Phys. 148 (2020) 103541, [ arXiv:19/zero.alt34./zero.alt34915]

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    Alexandre and E

    R. Alexandre and E. Fabel, Introduction to cartan geometry, May, 2024

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    Butter, F

    D. Butter, F. Hassler, C. N. Pope, and H. Zhang, Consistent truncations and dualities , JHEP 04 (2023) 007, [arXiv:2211.13241]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Hassler, O

    F. Hassler, O. Hulik, and D. Osten, Current algebra and generalized Cartan geometry , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 12 126022, [ arXiv:24/zero.alt39./zero.alt3/zero.alt3176]

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Hassler, D

    F. Hassler, D. Osten, and A. Swash, Gauged Extended Field Theory and Generalised Cartan Geometry, arXiv:25/zero.alt39./zero.alt34595

    work page

  70. [70]

    Poláček and W

    M. Poláček and W . Siegel, Natural curvature for manifest T-duality , JHEP 01 (2014) 026, [arXiv:13/zero.alt38.635/zero.alt3]

    work page 2014

  71. [71]

    Bossard, M

    G. Bossard, M. Cederwall, A. Kleinschmidt, J. Palmkvis t, and H. Samtleben, Generalized diffeomorphisms for E9, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 10 106022, [ arXiv:17/zero.alt38./zero.alt38936]

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Bossard, F

    G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, A. Kleinschmidt, and H. Samtleben, E9 exceptional field theory. Part I. The potential, JHEP 03 (2019) 089, [arXiv:1811./zero.alt34/zero.alt388]

    work page 2019

  73. [73]

    Bossard, F

    G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, A. Kleinschmidt, and H. Samtleben, E9 exceptional field theory. Part II. The complete dynamics , JHEP 05 (2021) 107, [arXiv:21/zero.alt33.12118]

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    Cederwall and J

    M. Cederwall and J. Palmkvist, Tensor Hierarchy Algebra Extensions of Over- Extended Kac–Moody Algebras , Commun. Math. Phys. 389 (2022), no. 1 571–620, [arXiv:21/zero.alt33./zero.alt32476]

    work page 2022

  75. [75]

    Cederwall and J

    M. Cederwall and J. Palmkvist, Gradient structures from extensions of over-extended Kac- Moody algebras, JHEP 08 (2025) 200, [arXiv:25/zero.alt33.17779]. 23 Generalised Cartan Geometry David Osten

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Bossard, A

    G. Bossard, A. Kleinschmidt, and E. Sezgin, On supersymmetric E11 exceptional field theory , JHEP 10 (2019) 165, [arXiv:19/zero.alt37./zero.alt32/zero.alt38/zero.alt3]

    work page 2019

  77. [77]

    Bossard, A

    G. Bossard, A. Kleinschmidt, and E. Sezgin, A master exceptional field theory , JHEP 06 (2021) 185, [arXiv:21/zero.alt33.13411]

    work page 2021

  78. [78]

    Hassler and Y

    F. Hassler and Y . Sakatani, Hierarchy of curvatures in exceptional geometry, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 10 106002, [ arXiv:2311.12/zero.alt395]

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    Hassler and Y

    F. Hassler and Y . Sakatani,Consistent truncation and generalized duality based on exceptional generalized cosets, arXiv:251/zero.alt3.12799

    work page

  80. [80]

    Butter, Exploring the geometry of supersymmetric double field theor y, JHEP 01 (2022) 152, [arXiv:21/zero.alt31.1/zero.alt3328]

    D. Butter, Exploring the geometry of supersymmetric double field theor y, JHEP 01 (2022) 152, [arXiv:21/zero.alt31.1/zero.alt3328]

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.