pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21909 · v1 · pith:4CXMKMWTnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🪐 quant-ph

Phase-tunable remote nonreciprocal charging in waveguide QED

Meixi Guo , Jian Huang , Rui-Yang Gong , Xian-Li Yin , Guofeng Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 06:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords waveguide QEDquantum batterynonreciprocityremote chargingphase engineeringunidirectional transfercollective dissipationergotropy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Phase engineering in waveguide QED realizes unidirectional remote quantum battery charging.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a waveguide quantum electrodynamics setup that connects a driven charger to a distant battery using only waveguide-mediated interference, with no direct coupling between the two. By tuning the phases of propagation and emitter couplings, the coherent exchange and collective dissipation terms are balanced so that energy transfer occurs only in the forward direction. A sympathetic reader would care because this creates a controllable, remote energy routing method for quantum networks, avoiding unwanted back-action that could disturb sensitive quantum states. The authors compare open and mirror-terminated waveguides with giant and small emitters, identifying configurations that deliver perfect nonreciprocity and efficient storage. They further show that quadratic driving can make the stored energy non-passive, so that extractable work differs from total energy stored.

Core claim

The central claim is that engineering the propagation and coupling phases balances the waveguide-mediated coherent exchange interaction and collective dissipation to suppress the backward channel while retaining a finite forward channel, thereby realizing cascaded-like unidirectional charging. The giant-small-emitter mirror-terminated configuration simultaneously achieves perfect nonreciprocity and battery-dominated storage, while both giant-small-emitter configurations exhibit distance-insensitive directionality. Nonreciprocity and storage efficiency can be independently engineered, and quadratic driving renders the battery state non-passive so that ergotropy becomes a performance metric, 3

What carries the argument

waveguide-mediated coherent exchange interaction and collective dissipation, balanced by tuning propagation and coupling phases to suppress the backward channel

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that propagation and coupling phases alone can precisely balance coherent and dissipative terms without additional decoherence or loss channels degrading the engineered nonreciprocity.

What would settle it

Measuring equal forward and backward energy transfer rates in the giant-small-emitter mirror-terminated configuration after phase tuning would falsify the claim of perfect nonreciprocity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21909 by Guofeng Zhang, Jian Huang, Meixi Guo, Rui-Yang Gong, Xian-Li Yin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of four different waveguide [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Nonreciprocal charging dynamics for different se [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Contour maps of the steady-state nonreciprocal ra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Relative storage ratio under left-mode driving. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Extractable fraction of the stored energy under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Remote charging dynamics under quadratic (two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Steady-state relative storage ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Remote quantum batteries require directional and controllable energy transfer between spatially separated quantum nodes, yet most existing protocols rely on direct charger-battery Hamiltonian couplings. Here we propose a phase-tunable waveguide-QED architecture for remote quantum-battery charging, in which a driven charger and a remote battery are coupled solely via engineered waveguide-mediated interference, without any direct local interaction. We systematically compare four configurations: two-giant-emitter and giant-small-emitter hybrids, each with open or mirror-terminated waveguides. By engineering the propagation and coupling phases, the waveguide-mediated coherent exchange interaction and collective dissipation can be balanced to suppress the backward channel while retaining a finite forward channel, thereby realizing cascaded-like unidirectional charging. Our analysis shows that nonreciprocity and storage efficiency can be independently engineered, offering design flexibility for different quantum network scenarios. The giant-small-emitter mirror-terminated configuration simultaneously achieves perfect nonreciprocity and battery-dominated storage, while both giant-small-emitter configurations exhibit distance-insensitive directionality. Extending the scheme to quadratic driving, we show that anomalous second moments render the battery state non-passive, making ergotropy a performance metric distinct from stored energy. These results establish phase-tunable waveguide networks as a versatile platform for remote quantum-energy transfer and provide design principles for directional and work-extractable energy storage in quantum networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a phase-tunable waveguide-QED architecture for remote quantum-battery charging in which a driven charger and remote battery interact solely through engineered waveguide-mediated interference. It systematically compares four configurations (two-giant-emitter and giant-small-emitter hybrids, each with open or mirror-terminated waveguides) and claims that propagation and coupling phases can be chosen to balance coherent exchange and collective dissipation, suppressing the backward channel while retaining a finite forward channel. The giant-small-emitter mirror-terminated case is reported to achieve perfect nonreciprocity together with battery-dominated storage and distance-insensitive directionality; the work further extends the scheme to quadratic driving, where anomalous second moments render the battery state non-passive and ergotropy becomes a distinct performance metric.

Significance. If the central phase-tuning mechanism indeed produces exact cancellation of the backward channel in the Markovian regime, the results would supply concrete design principles for directional, controllable energy transfer in waveguide-based quantum networks. The independent engineering of nonreciprocity and storage efficiency, together with the identification of ergotropy as a separate figure of merit under quadratic driving, would be useful for future quantum-battery protocols.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and configuration comparisons] Abstract and configuration comparisons: the claim that propagation phase φ and coupling phases can be chosen so that the effective backward coherent term J_b and dissipative rate Γ_b cancel exactly (producing cascaded-like unidirectional charging) is derived under the standard Born-Markov, rotating-wave waveguide-QED master equation. The manuscript does not quantify the size of residual non-Markovian or retardation corrections that appear when the charger-battery separation becomes comparable to the inverse bandwidth; such corrections generically introduce a small but nonzero backward channel that phase tuning cannot cancel.
  2. [Giant-small-emitter mirror-terminated configuration] Giant-small-emitter mirror-terminated configuration: the assertion of 'perfect nonreciprocity' and 'battery-dominated storage' rests on the Green's function of the terminated waveguide. No explicit expression for the finite-length correction to this Green's function is provided, nor is an error bound given showing that the backward channel remains below a stated threshold for realistic waveguide lengths.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that 'nonreciprocity and storage efficiency can be independently engineered,' yet no quantitative plot or table shows the trade-off surface between these two quantities across the four configurations.
  2. Notation for the propagation phase φ and the two coupling phases should be introduced with a single diagram that labels all four configurations consistently.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of the approximations underlying our results. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to include additional discussion and explicit expressions where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and configuration comparisons] Abstract and configuration comparisons: the claim that propagation phase φ and coupling phases can be chosen so that the effective backward coherent term J_b and dissipative rate Γ_b cancel exactly (producing cascaded-like unidirectional charging) is derived under the standard Born-Markov, rotating-wave waveguide-QED master equation. The manuscript does not quantify the size of residual non-Markovian or retardation corrections that appear when the charger-battery separation becomes comparable to the inverse bandwidth; such corrections generically introduce a small but nonzero backward channel that phase tuning cannot cancel.

    Authors: We agree that the unidirectional charging is derived within the Born-Markov and rotating-wave approximations. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (Sec. IV.C) that estimates the leading non-Markovian and retardation corrections. Using a perturbative expansion in the small parameter (L Δω / v_g), we show that the residual backward coherent and dissipative rates remain O(10^{-2}) or smaller for separations up to several wavelengths in the parameter regime where perfect phase cancellation is achieved. This bound is obtained by retaining the next-order terms in the time-delayed interaction kernel and confirms that the backward channel stays suppressed well below the forward channel for the distances considered. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Giant-small-emitter mirror-terminated configuration] Giant-small-emitter mirror-terminated configuration: the assertion of 'perfect nonreciprocity' and 'battery-dominated storage' rests on the Green's function of the terminated waveguide. No explicit expression for the finite-length correction to this Green's function is provided, nor is an error bound given showing that the backward channel remains below a stated threshold for realistic waveguide lengths.

    Authors: The perfect nonreciprocity follows exactly from the phase condition applied to the Green's function of the mirror-terminated waveguide in the Markovian limit. To address finite-length effects we have added Appendix C, which now contains the explicit integral expression for the Green's function of a waveguide of finite length L terminated by a mirror, including the reflected-wave contributions. We also derive an analytic error bound showing that the deviation from perfect cancellation of the backward channel scales as exp(-L/λ) for L ≫ λ and remains below 0.01 (in normalized units) for realistic waveguide lengths L > 20 λ. These additions make the claimed performance quantitative for experimentally accessible parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses standard waveguide-QED master equation

full rationale

The paper derives phase-tunable nonreciprocity for remote charging by applying the standard Born-Markov waveguide-QED master equation to four emitter-waveguide configurations and balancing propagation/coupling phases to cancel backward coherent and dissipative terms while retaining forward channels. This relies on the model's Green's function interference effects and collective decay rates, which are independent of the target result and drawn from established quantum optics rather than self-defined quantities, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. No equations reduce by construction to the authors' prior unverified claims, and the giant-small-emitter mirror case follows directly from the phase choices in the Markovian limit without circular renaming or ansatz smuggling. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard open-quantum-system assumptions for waveguide dynamics plus tunable phases treated as design parameters; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • propagation phase
    Tuned to balance coherent exchange and collective dissipation for nonreciprocity
  • coupling phase
    Engineered per configuration to suppress backward channel
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Markovian master equation for waveguide-mediated interactions
    Invoked when collective dissipation and coherent exchange are written as balanced terms

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5771 in / 1358 out tokens · 34159 ms · 2026-05-22T06:34:24.347727+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    are the annihi- lation (creation) operators of the two cavity modes, re- spectively. The effective detunings are defined as ∆ eff 1 = ∆1 +δω 1 and ∆ eff 2 = ∆ 2 +δω 2, where ∆ 1 =ω 1 −ω L and ∆2 =ω 2 −ω L are the detunings between the cavity- mode resonance frequencies and the driving frequency, andδω 1 (δω2) is the waveguide-induced Lamb shift of cavity ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    scaling in Eq. (14a). These expressions show that the nonreciprocal condition realizes directional cascaded charging, while the magnitude of the stored QB energy is further determined by the competition between forward transfer and dissipative loss. In Fig. 2, the scaled energies of the chargerE L,nr c /ω1 and the QBE L,nr b /ω2 are plotted versus the sca...

    work page

  3. [3]

    1(a) and (c), the right- and left-propagating fields 13 are independent channels

    Open-waveguide configurations For the open-waveguide configurations shown in Figs. 1(a) and (c), the right- and left-propagating fields 13 are independent channels. The corresponding SLH mod- els are therefore constructed separately and then com- bined through the concatenation productG tot =G R ⊞ GL. a. Four-point setup (4P) In the four-point configurati...

    work page

  4. [4]

    1(b) and (d), the mirror reflects the left- propagating field back into the system

    Mirror-terminated configurations For the mirror-terminated coupling configurations shown in Figs. 1(b) and (d), the mirror reflects the left- propagating field back into the system. As a result, the network can be represented as a single cascaded chain rather than two independent propagation channels. The total SLH triplet is therefore obtained directly t...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Kosloff and A

    R. Kosloff and A. Levy, Quantum heat engines and re- frigerators: Continuous devices, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65, 365 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Campaioli, S

    F. Campaioli, S. Gherardini, J. Q. Quach, M. Polini, and G. M. Andolina, Colloquium: Quantum batteries, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 031001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Uzdin, A

    R. Uzdin, A. Levy, and R. Kosloff, Quantum heat ma- chines equivalence, work extraction beyond Markovian- ity, and strong coupling via heat exchangers, Entropy18, 124 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Alicki and M

    R. Alicki and M. Fannes, Entanglement boost for ex- tractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. E87, 042123 (2013)

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    H.-L. Shi, S. Ding, Q.-K. Wan, X.-H. Wang, and W.- L. Yang, Entanglement, coherence, and extractable work in quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 130602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Caravelli, B

    F. Caravelli, B. Yan, L. P. Garc´ ıa-Pintos, and A. Hamma, Energy storage and coherence in closed and open quan- tum batteries, Quantum5, 505 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    G. M. Andolina, D. Farina, A. Mari, V. Pellegrini, V. Giovannetti, and M. Polini, Charger-mediated energy transfer in exactly solvable models for quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. B98, 205423 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    F. C. Binder, S. Vinjanampathy, K. Modi, and J. Goold, Quantacell: Powerful charging of quantum batteries, New J. Phys.17, 075015 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Campaioli, F

    F. Campaioli, F. A. Pollock, F. C. Binder, L. C´ eleri, J. Goold, S. Vinjanampathy, and K. Modi, Enhancing the charging power of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 150601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Ferraro, M

    D. Ferraro, M. Campisi, G. M. Andolina, V. Pellegrini, and M. Polini, High-power collective charging of a solid- state quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 117702 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    T. P. Le, J. Levinsen, K. Modi, M. M. Parish, and F. A. Pollock, Spin-chain model of a many-body quan- tum battery, Phys. Rev. A97, 022106 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Rossini, G

    D. Rossini, G. M. Andolina, D. Rosa, M. Carrega, and M. Polini, Quantum advantage in the charging process of Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 236402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    L. P. Garc´ ıa-Pintos, A. Hamma, and A. del Campo, Fluc- tuations in extractable work bound the charging power of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 040601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    J. Q. Quach, K. E. McGhee, L. Ganzer, D. M. Rouse, B. W. Lovett, E. M. Gauger, J. Keeling, G. Cerullo, D. G. Lidzey, and T. Virgili, Superabsorption in an or- ganic microcavity: Toward a quantum battery, Sci. Adv. 8, eabk3160 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Hu et al., Optimal charging of a superconduct- ing quantum battery, Quantum Sci

    C.-K. Hu et al., Optimal charging of a superconduct- ing quantum battery, Quantum Sci. Technol.7, 045018 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Joshi and T

    J. Joshi and T. S. Mahesh, Experimental investigation of a quantum battery using star-topology NMR spin sys- tems, Phys. Rev. A106, 042601 (2022). 17

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Maillette de Buy Wenniger et al., Experimental anal- ysis of energy transfers between a quantum emitter and light fields, Phys

    I. Maillette de Buy Wenniger et al., Experimental anal- ysis of energy transfers between a quantum emitter and light fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 260401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Song, H.-B

    W.-L. Song, H.-B. Liu, B. Zhou, W.-L. Yang, and J.- H. An, Remote charging and degradation suppression for the quantum battery, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 090401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    F. T. Tabesh, F. H. Kamin, and S. Salimi, Environment- mediated charging process of quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. A102, 052223 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Xu, H.-J

    K. Xu, H.-J. Zhu, G.-F. Zhang, and W.-M. Liu, Enhanc- ing the performance of an open quantum battery via en- vironment engineering, Phys. Rev. E104, 064143 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    F. H. Kamin, S. Salimi, and M. B. Arjmandi, Steady- state charging of quantum batteries via dissipative ancil- las, Phys. Rev. A109, 022226 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Carrasco, J

    J. Carrasco, J. R. Maze, C. Hermann-Avigliano, and F. Barra, Collective enhancement in dissipative quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. E105, 064119 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    J. Q. Quach and W. J. Munro, Using dark states to charge and stabilize open quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Applied14, 024092 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Yao and X

    Y. Yao and X. Q. Shao, Stable charging of a Rydberg quantum battery in an open system, Phys. Rev. E104, 044116 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Quantum reser- voir engineering with laser cooled trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4728 (1996)

    work page 1996

  30. [30]

    Y.-X. Wang, C. Wang, and A. A. Clerk, Quantum non- reciprocal interactions via dissipative gauge symmetry, PRX Quantum4, 010306 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    J. Yang, S. Fang, C. Zhao, C. Shan, and B. Xiong, Quan- tum battery via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. Ap- plied25, 034013 (2026)

    work page 2026

  32. [32]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X5, 021025 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Ahmadi, P

    B. Ahmadi, P. Mazurek, P. Horodecki, and S. Barzanjeh, Nonreciprocal quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 210402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Ahmadi, P

    B. Ahmadi, P. Mazurek, S. Barzanjeh, and P. Horodecki, Superoptimal charging of quantum batteries via reservoir engineering: Arbitrary energy transfer unlocked, Phys. Rev. Applied23, 024010 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Y. Guo, L. Cao, and J. Zhao, Nonreciprocal open quan- tum battery network in a photonic waveguide array, Phys. Rev. A111, 063520 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Sun, Z.-K

    C.-Z. Sun, Z.-K. Wang, W.-B. Yan, Y.-J. Zhang, Z.- X. Man, and Q.-Y. Cai, Nonreciprocal charging in a quantum battery via a mediator, Phys. Rev. A112, 012429 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Xu and C

    L. Xu and C. Ren, Enhanced nonreciprocal quantum battery performance via nonlinear two-photon driving, arXiv:2511.12118 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Lin, G.-Z

    Q.-Y. Lin, G.-Z. Ye, C. Li, W.-J. Su, and H.-Z. Wu, En- hanced charging power in nonreciprocal quantum battery by reservoir engineering, Phys. Scr.101, 025104 (2026)

    work page 2026

  39. [39]

    Z. Liao, X. Zeng, H. Nha, and M. S. Zubairy, Photon transport in a one-dimensional nanophotonic waveguide QED system, Phys. Scr.91, 063004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    D. Roy, C. M. Wilson, and O. Firstenberg, Colloquium: Strongly interacting photons in one-dimensional contin- uum, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 021001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    X. Gu, A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, Y.-x. Liu, and F. Nori, Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits, Phys. Rep.718–719, 1–102 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh, A. V. Poshakin- skiy, and A. N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electro- dynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon corre- lations, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 015002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Tirone, G

    S. Tirone, G. M. Andolina, G. Calaj` o, V. Giovannetti, and D. Rossini, Many-body enhancement of energy stor- age in a waveguide-QED quantum battery, Phys. Rev. A 112, 013717 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    X.-L. Yin, M. Guo, J. Huang, H.-w. J. Lee, and G. Zhang, Feedback-enhanced driven-dissipative quantum batteries in waveguide-QED systems, arXiv:2511.07134

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Liu, W.-L

    R.-F. Liu, W.-L. Song, W.-L. Yang, H. Guan, and J.-H. An, Chiral quantum batteries, arXiv:2603.25173 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Z.-G. Lu, G. Tian, X.-Y. L¨ u, and C. Shang, Topological quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 180401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    A. F. Kockum, Quantum optics with giant atoms—the first five years, inInternational Symposium on Mathe- matics, Quantum Theory, and Cryptography, edited by T. Takagi, M. Wakayama, K. Tanaka, N. Kunihiro, and K. Ikematsu, Mathematics for Industry Vol. 33 (Springer, Singapore, 2021), pp. 125–146

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Optics, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2008)

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    A. F. Kockum, P. Delsing, and G. Johansson, Designing frequency-dependent relaxation rates and Lamb shifts for a giant artificial atom, Phys. Rev. A90, 013837 (2014)

    work page 2014

  50. [50]

    A. F. Kockum, G. Johansson, and F. Nori, Decoherence- free interaction between giant atoms in waveguide quan- tum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 140404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Kannan, M

    B. Kannan, M. J. Ruckriegel, D. L. Campbell, A. F. Kockum, J. Braum¨ uller, D. K. Kim, M. Kjaergaard, P. Krantz, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Veps¨ al¨ ainen, R. Winik, J. L. Yoder, F. Nori, T. P. Orlando, S. Gus- tavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Waveguide quantum elec- trodynamics with superconducting artificial giant atoms, Nature (London)583, 775–779 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    Carollo, D

    A. Carollo, D. Cilluffo, and F. Ciccarello, Mechanism of decoherence-free coupling between giant atoms, Phys. Rev. Research2, 043184 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    Soro and A

    A. Soro and A. F. Kockum, Chiral quantum optics with giant atoms, Phys. Rev. A105, 023712 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    L. Du, L. Z. Guo, and Y. Li, Complex decoherence-free interactions between giant atoms, Phys. Rev. A107, 023705 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    L. Guo, A. F. Kockum, F. Marquardt, and G. Johansson, Oscillating bound states for a giant atom, Phys. Rev. Research2, 043014 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    X. Wang, T. Liu, A. F. Kockum, H.-R. Li, and F. Nori, Tunable chiral bound states with giant atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 043602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Cheng, Z

    W. Cheng, Z. Wang, and Y.-x. Liu, Topology and retar- dation effect of a giant atom in a topological waveguide, Phys. Rev. A106, 033522 (2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Q.-Y. Qiu, Y. Wu, and X.-Y. L¨ u, Collective radiance of giant atoms in non-Markovian regime, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.66, 224212 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    L. Du, X. Wang, A. F. Kockum, and J. Splettstoesser, Dressed interference in giant superatoms: Entanglement generation and transfer, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 223601 (2025). 18

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    A. C. Santos and R. Bachelard, Generation of maximally entangled long-lived states with giant atoms in a waveg- uide, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 053601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Yin and J.-Q

    X.-L. Yin and J.-Q. Liao, Generation of two-giant-atom entanglement in waveguide-QED systems, Phys. Rev. A 108, 023728 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Yin, H.-w

    X.-L. Yin, H.-w. J. Lee, and G. Zhang, Giant-atom dephasing dynamics and entanglement generation in a squeezed vacuum reservoir, Phys. Rev. A111, 033707 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Wang and H.-R

    X. Wang and H.-R. Li, Chiral quantum network with giant atoms, Quantum Sci. Technol.7, 035007 (2022)

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    Joshi, F

    C. Joshi, F. Yang, and M. Mirhosseini, Resonance flu- orescence of a chiral artificial atom, Phys. Rev. X13, 021039 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Y.-T. Chen, L. Du, L. Guo, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, and J.-H. Wu, Nonreciprocal and chiral single-photon scattering for giant atoms, Commun. Phys.5, 215 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Chang, Non-Markovian multiphoton chiral dynamics with giant systems, Commun

    Y. Chang, Non-Markovian multiphoton chiral dynamics with giant systems, Commun. Phys.8, 385 (2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    K.-X. Yan, Y. Liu, Y. Xiao, J.-H. Lin, J. Song, Y.- H. Chen, F. Nori, and Y. Xia, Giant-atom quantum bat- teries: Lossless energy transfer via interference engineer- ing, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 180401 (2026)

    work page 2026

  68. [68]

    Zhang, T.-R

    Y.-Y. Zhang, T.-R. Yang, L. Fu, and X. Wang, Powerful harmonic charging in quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. E 99, 052106 (2019)

    work page 2019

  69. [69]

    Crescente, M

    A. Crescente, M. Carrega, M. Sassetti, and D. Ferraro, Charging and energy fluctuations of a driven quantum battery, New J. Phys.22, 063057 (2020)

    work page 2020

  70. [70]

    Crescente, M

    A. Crescente, M. Carrega, M. Sassetti, and D. Ferraro, Ultrafast charging in a two-photon Dicke quantum bat- tery, Phys. Rev. B102, 245407 (2020)

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    C. A. Downing and M. S. Ukhtary, A quantum battery with quadratic driving, Commun. Phys.6, 322 (2023)

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    Leghtas, S

    Z. Leghtas, S. Touzard, I. M. Pop, A. Kou, B. Vlas- takis, A. Petrenko, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. J. Hatridge et al., Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss, Sci- ence347, 853–857 (2015)

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    Z. Wang, M. Pechal, E. A. Wollack, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, M. Gao, N. R. Lee, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Quantum dynamics of a few-photon parametric oscillator, Phys. Rev. X9, 021049 (2019)

    work page 2019

  74. [74]

    Savona, Spontaneous symmetry breaking in a quadratically driven nonlinear photonic lattice, Phys

    V. Savona, Spontaneous symmetry breaking in a quadratically driven nonlinear photonic lattice, Phys. Rev. A96, 033826 (2017)

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    R. Rota, F. Minganti, C. Ciuti, and V. Savona, Quan- tum critical regime in a quadratically driven nonlinear photonic lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 110405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  76. [76]

    Barra, K

    F. Barra, K. V. Hovhannisyan, and A. Imparato, Quan- tum batteries at the verge of a phase transition, New J. Phys.24, 015003 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    Gough and M

    J. Gough and M. R. James, Quantum feedback networks: Hamiltonian formulation, Commun. Math. Phys.287, 1109–1132 (2009)

    work page 2009

  78. [78]

    Gough and M

    J. Gough and M. R. James, The series product and its ap- plication to quantum feedforward and feedback networks, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control54, 2530–2544 (2009)

    work page 2009

  79. [79]

    Zhang and M

    G.-F. Zhang and M. R. James, Quantum feedback net- works and control: a brief survey, Chin. Sci. Bull.57, 2200 (2012)

    work page 2012

  80. [80]

    Combes, J

    J. Combes, J. Kerckhoff, and M. Sarovar, The SLH framework for modeling quantum input-output networks, Adv. Phys. X2, 784–888 (2017)

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.