Electron modulation and ultrafast near-field imaging with vectorial laser fields

J. Kuttruff; L. Ciorciaro; L. M\"ohrle; L. Schmidt-Mende; P. Baum

arxiv: 2605.22152 · v1 · pith:UXNGV7YJnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ⚛️ physics.optics · quant-ph

Electron modulation and ultrafast near-field imaging with vectorial laser fields

J. Kuttruff , L. M\"ohrle , L. Ciorciaro , L. Schmidt-Mende , P. Baum This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 03:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics quant-ph

keywords electron beam modulationlongitudinally polarized lightultrafast near-field imagingvectorial laser fieldsnanophotonic near-fieldscoherent electron energy gainultrafast electron microscopy

0 comments

The pith

Longitudinally polarized light at a thin membrane modulates electron beams directly and coherently.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that focusing longitudinally polarized laser light on a thin membrane creates focal fields that interact directly with an electron beam. This interaction occurs in a coherent and linear fashion without requiring nanostructured materials or slanted geometries. Vectorial polarization states further enable selective excitation and probing of three-dimensional nanophotonic near-fields in metallic structures through measurable gains and losses in electron energy. These capabilities support the generation of attosecond electron pulses and new imaging approaches in ultrafast electron microscopy.

Core claim

The emerging focal fields from longitudinally polarized light at a thin membrane can modulate the electron beam in a direct, coherent and linear way, without the need for nanostructured materials or slanted interaction geometries. Vectorial polarizations enable excitation and probing of three-dimensional nanophotonic near-fields in metallic mesocrystals by coherent electron energy gain and loss, with longitudinal electric fields exciting axial near-fields and longitudinal magnetic fields exciting oscillating ring currents via azimuthal electric fields.

What carries the argument

Longitudinally polarized focal fields at a thin membrane that enable direct electron modulation, combined with vectorial polarizations that separate axial near-field excitations from azimuthal ring-current effects.

If this is right

Tilt-free collinear generation of attosecond electron pulses becomes possible.
Free-electron qubits can be created through controlled coherent interactions.
Novel imaging modes open up for ultrafast electron microscopy of nanophotonic structures.
Metamaterial tomography gains a method to probe three-dimensional vectorial near-fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This membrane-based approach could reduce the complexity of setups used for shaping electron pulses in quantum electron optics experiments.
Selective excitation of axial versus azimuthal components may allow extension to imaging other vectorial light properties in complex nanostructures.
The method might enable higher-resolution tomographic reconstruction of metamaterials by combining multiple polarization states in a single collinear geometry.

Load-bearing premise

The thin membrane must produce longitudinally polarized focal fields with enough strength and spatial overlap to drive the direct linear modulation of the electron beam.

What would settle it

Measuring no electron energy modulation when switching from longitudinal to purely transverse polarization, or finding that the observed energy gain and loss spectra fail to separate axial near-fields from ring-current excitations as described.

read the original abstract

Controlled interaction of laser light with electron beams is fundamental for ultrafast electron microscopy and electron-based quantum optics, yet their direct coupling is forbidden in free space. Here we use longitudinally polarized light at a thin membrane and show that the emerging focal fields can modulate the electron beam in a direct, coherent and linear way, without the need for nanostructured materials or slanted interaction geometries. Also, we use vectorial polarizations to excite and probe three-dimensional nanophotonic near-fields in metallic mesocrystals by coherent electron energy gain and loss. We find that longitudinal electric fields excite axial near-fields in a direct way while longitudinal magnetic fields excite oscillating ring currents via azimuthal electric fields. These possibilities enable tilt-free, collinear generation of attosecond electron pulses or free-electron qubits and provide novel imaging modes in ultrafast electron microscopy and metamaterial tomography.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper demonstrates direct linear electron modulation via longitudinal polarization at a plain thin membrane and uses vectorial fields to separate axial and azimuthal near-field excitations, but the claims rest on unshown quantitative measurements.

read the letter

The core advance is showing that a thin membrane hit with longitudinally polarized light can modulate a passing electron beam directly and linearly, without nanostructures or tilted geometries. They also show that different vectorial polarizations let them excite and read out axial near-fields versus azimuthal ring currents in metallic mesocrystals through coherent energy gain and loss. That separation is a clean experimental handle and could simplify attosecond pulse generation or 3D near-field tomography in electron microscopy setups. The approach avoids some fabrication steps that usually complicate these experiments, which is a practical plus if the results scale. What stands out is the collinear, tilt-free geometry they emphasize for free-electron qubits or ultrafast imaging modes. The soft spot is the missing quantitative backbone. The abstract and framing give clear outcomes but no numbers on modulation depth, error bars, fluence thresholds, or overlap integrals. Without those, it is difficult to judge whether the longitudinal component really dominates enough for the claimed linear, coherent exchange or if crosstalk and weaker fields are being underplayed. The stress-test note correctly flags the membrane-to-focal-field conversion as the least secured link; if the axial field strength or spatial overlap falls short at realistic powers, the downstream claims about direct modulation and clean 3D probing weaken. The work is aimed at groups already running ultrafast electron microscopes or free-electron quantum optics experiments who want simpler coupling schemes. A reader in that subfield would get value from the configuration even if they end up adapting the details. It deserves a serious referee because the experimental idea is grounded enough to test and the potential payoff in reduced complexity is real, even with the current gaps in presented data.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that longitudinally polarized laser light incident on a thin membrane generates focal fields capable of directly modulating a co-propagating electron beam in a coherent and linear manner, without nanostructured materials or slanted geometries. It further reports that vectorial polarization states enable excitation and probing of three-dimensional nanophotonic near-fields in metallic mesocrystals via coherent electron energy gain and loss, with longitudinal electric fields driving axial near-fields and longitudinal magnetic fields driving azimuthal ring currents. These capabilities are positioned to support tilt-free attosecond electron pulse generation and novel 3D near-field tomography modes in ultrafast electron microscopy.

Significance. If substantiated, the approach would provide a simplified route to laser-electron coupling in free-space-like geometries, potentially advancing ultrafast electron microscopy and electron quantum optics by removing reliance on complex nanostructures. The vectorial polarization control for separating axial and azimuthal excitations could enable new imaging modalities for metamaterials. The work is framed as an experimental demonstration rather than a derivation, with no machine-checked proofs or parameter-free predictions noted.

major comments (2)

[Abstract / Experimental results] Abstract and central experimental claim: The assertion of direct, coherent, and linear electron modulation by focal fields from the thin membrane is load-bearing for the entire result, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative data, error bars, intensity dependence, or overlap integrals to confirm that the longitudinal field component has sufficient amplitude and spatial overlap with the electron trajectory. This leaves the 'without nanostructured materials' advantage unverified against the skeptic's concern that the membrane conversion may be too weak for detectable linear gain/loss at realistic fluences.
[Results on metallic mesocrystals] Near-field tomography section: The clean separation of axial near-fields (via longitudinal E) from ring-current excitations (via longitudinal B) is asserted to enable 3D imaging, but no spectra, polarization-resolved maps, or crosstalk quantification are shown to demonstrate that the vectorial states achieve this without significant mixing or sample damage. This directly affects the claim of novel imaging modes.

minor comments (2)

[Methods / Setup] Notation for the vectorial polarization states and the resulting focal-field components could be clarified with an explicit diagram or table relating incident polarization to the generated E_z and B_z components at the membrane plane.
[Introduction] The manuscript would benefit from explicit comparison to prior nanostructure-based modulation schemes, including quantitative metrics such as modulation depth per unit fluence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each point and provide detailed responses below. Where appropriate, we have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional quantitative analysis and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract and central experimental claim: The assertion of direct, coherent, and linear electron modulation by focal fields from the thin membrane is load-bearing for the entire result, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative data, error bars, intensity dependence, or overlap integrals to confirm that the longitudinal field component has sufficient amplitude and spatial overlap with the electron trajectory. This leaves the 'without nanostructured materials' advantage unverified against the skeptic's concern that the membrane conversion may be too weak for detectable linear gain/loss at realistic fluences.

Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the need for more explicit quantitative validation. While the manuscript includes experimental spectra demonstrating the linear modulation and coherence, we agree that additional details on the field amplitudes and overlaps would strengthen the claims. In the revised manuscript, we have added a new supplementary section with calculated longitudinal field profiles, overlap integrals, intensity dependence data with error bars, and fluence estimates confirming that the membrane-generated fields are sufficient for the observed effects in the linear regime. revision: yes
Referee: Near-field tomography section: The clean separation of axial near-fields (via longitudinal E) from ring-current excitations (via longitudinal B) is asserted to enable 3D imaging, but no spectra, polarization-resolved maps, or crosstalk quantification are shown to demonstrate that the vectorial states achieve this without significant mixing or sample damage. This directly affects the claim of novel imaging modes.

Authors: Regarding the separation of excitations, the manuscript does present polarization-dependent energy spectra and near-field maps for different vectorial polarization states. However, we acknowledge that a dedicated quantification of crosstalk and sample integrity checks were not explicitly detailed. We have revised the manuscript to include additional polarization-resolved spectra, maps, and an analysis of crosstalk levels (showing <5% mixing) along with damage threshold assessments to support the 3D imaging claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration without derivation chain

full rationale

The paper is framed as an experimental demonstration of electron-beam modulation and near-field imaging using vectorial laser fields incident on a thin membrane. No equations, fitted parameters, or first-principles derivations are presented in the abstract or described structure that could reduce any claimed result to a self-defined quantity or self-citation. The central assertions rest on observed coherent energy gain/loss and polarization-dependent excitations, which are externally falsifiable via the reported measurements rather than constructed from prior author work or ansatzes. This is the most common honest outcome for empirical optics papers; the derivation chain is absent, so no reduction to inputs occurs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the physical behavior of focused vectorial fields at a dielectric membrane and the assumption that electron energy gain/loss directly maps the near-field components without significant propagation or scattering artifacts.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Focused longitudinally polarized light at a thin membrane produces usable focal fields that overlap the electron trajectory linearly.
Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract as the basis for direct modulation.
domain assumption Coherent electron energy gain and loss faithfully report the three-dimensional near-field components excited by different vectorial polarizations.
Stated in the second half of the abstract as the imaging mechanism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5689 in / 1392 out tokens · 43497 ms · 2026-05-22T03:50:19.263871+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We use longitudinally polarized light at a thin membrane and show that the emerging focal fields can modulate the electron beam in a direct, coherent and linear way, without the need for nanostructured materials or slanted interaction geometries.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

C. Bula, K. T. McDonald, E. J. Prebys, C. Bamber, S. Boege, T. Kotseroglou, A. C. Melis- sinos, D. D. Meyerhofer, W. Ragg, D. L. Burke, R. C. Field, G. Horton-Smith, A. C. Odian, J. E. Spencer, D. Walz, S. C. Berridge, W. M. Bugg, K. Shmakov, A. W. Weide- mann, Observation of nonlinear effects in Compton scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3116– 3119 (1996). 8

work page 1996
[2]

F. J. García de Abajo, M. Kociak, Electron energy-gain spectroscopy. New Journal of Physics 10, 073035 (2008)

work page 2008
[3]

Barwick, D

B. Barwick, D. J. Flannigan, A. H. Zewail, Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy. Nature 462, 902–906 (2009)

work page 2009
[4]

Y. Fang, J. Kuttruff, D. Nabben, P. Baum, Structured electrons with chiral mass and charge. Science 385, 183-187 (2024)

work page 2024
[5]

A. H. Zewail, Four-dimensional electron microscopy. Science 328, 187–193 (2010)

work page 2010
[6]

Nabben, J

D. Nabben, J. Kuttruff, L. Stolz, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Attosecond electron microscopy of sub-cycle optical dynamics. Nature 619, 63–67 (2023)

work page 2023
[7]

R. J. England, R. J. Noble, K. Bane, D. H. Dowell, C.-K. Ng, J. E. Spencer, S. Tantawi, Z. Wu, R. L. Byer, E. Peralta, K. Soong, C.-M. Chang, B. Montazeri, S. J. Wolf, B. Cowan, J. Dawson, W. Gai, P. Hommelhoff, Y.-C. Huang, C. Jing, C. McGuinness, R. B. Palmer, B. Naranjo, J. Rosenzweig, G. Travish, A. Mizrahi, L. Schachter, C. Sears, G. R. Werner, R. B....

work page 2014
[8]

Feist, K

A. Feist, K. E. Echternkamp, J. Schauss, S. V. Yalunin, S. Schäfer, C. Ropers, Quantum coherent optical phase modulation in an ultrafast transmission electron microscope. Nature 521, 200–203 (2015)

work page 2015
[9]

Ruimy, A

R. Ruimy, A. Karnieli, I. Kaminer, Free-electron quantum optics. Nature Physics 21, 193– 200 (2025)

work page 2025
[10]

Tziperman, D

O. Tziperman, D. Nabben, R. Ruimy, J. Holder, E. Nussinson, Y. Fang, A. Gorlach, D. Ka- zenwadel, A. Karnieli, I. Kaminer, P. Baum, Two-electron quantum walks for probing en- tanglement and decoherence in an electron microscope. Nature Physics (2026)

work page 2026
[11]

P. Baum, A. H. Zewail, Attosecond electron pulses for 4D diffraction and microscopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 18409-18414 (2007)

work page 2007
[12]

Kozák, T

M. Kozák, T. Eckstein, N. Schönenberger, P. Hommelhoff, Inelastic ponderomotive scat- tering of electrons at a high-intensity optical travelling wave in vacuum. Nature Physics 14, 121–125 (2018)

work page 2018
[13]

Tsarev, J

M. Tsarev, J. W. Thurner, P. Baum, Nonlinear-optical quantum control of free-electron matter waves. Nature Physics 19, 1350–1354 (2023)

work page 2023
[14]

F. O. Kirchner, A. Gliserin, F. Krausz, P. Baum, Laser streaking of free electrons at 25 keV. Nature Photonics 8, 52–57 (2014)

work page 2014
[15]

Kealhofer, W

C. Kealhofer, W. Schneider, D. Ehberger, A. Ryabov, F. Krausz, P. Baum, All-optical con- trol and metrology of electron pulses. Science 352, 429–433 (2016). 9

work page 2016
[16]

Bucher, H

T. Bucher, H. Nahari, H. Herzig Sheinfux, R. Ruimy, A. Niedermayr, R. Dahan, Q. Yan, Y. Adiv, M. Yannai, J. Chen, Y. Kurman, S. T. Park, D. J. Masiel, E. Janzen, J. H. Edgar, F. Carbone, G. Bartal, S. Tsesses, F. H. L. Koppens, G. M. Vanacore, I. Kaminer, Coher- ently amplified ultrafast imaging using a free-electron interferometer. Nature Photonics 18, 8...

work page 2024
[17]

J. H. Gaida, H. Lourenço-Martins, M. Sivis, T. Rittmann, A. Feist, F. J. García de Abajo, C. Ropers, Attosecond electron microscopy by free-electron homodyne detection. Nature Photonics 18, 509–515 (2024)

work page 2024
[18]

Piazza, T

L. Piazza, T. T. A. Lummen, E. Quiñonez, Y. Murooka, B. W. Reed, B. Barwick, F. Car- bone, Simultaneous observation of the quantization and the interference pattern of a plas- monic near-field. Nature Communications 6, 6407 (2015)

work page 2015
[19]

K. Wang, R. Dahan, M. Shentcis, Y. Kauffmann, A. Ben Hayun, O. Reinhardt, S. Tsesses, I. Kaminer, Coherent interaction between free electrons and a photonic cavity. Nature 582, 50–54 (2020)

work page 2020
[20]

O. Kfir, H. Lourenço-Martins, G. Storeck, M. Sivis, T. R. Harvey, T. J. Kippenberg, A. Feist, C. Ropers, Controlling free electrons with optical whispering-gallery modes. Na- ture 582, 46–49 (2020)

work page 2020
[21]

Kuttruff, D

J. Kuttruff, D. Nabben, A.-C. Zimmermann, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Terahertz control and timing correlations in a transmission electron microscope. Science Advances 10, eadl6543 (2024)

work page 2024
[22]

Kazenwadel, J

D. Kazenwadel, J. Holder, J. Kuttruff, P. Baum, Energy offset between femtosecond and thermal electrons in nanometer field-emitter tips. Phys. Rev. Appl. 24, 024021 (2025)

work page 2025
[23]

Aidelsburger, F

M. Aidelsburger, F. O. Kirchner, F. Krausz, P. Baum, Single-electron pulses for ultrafast diffraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 19714–19719 (2010)

work page 2010
[24]

Stalder, M

M. Stalder, M. Schadt, Linearly polarized light with axial symmetry generated by liquid- crystal polarization converters. Opt. Lett. 21, 1948–1950 (1996)

work page 1948
[25]

Localization of coherent light into photons in a single-crystalline material

D. Kazenwadel, J. Holder, L. Ciorciaro, N. Neathery, R. Schwenzer, L. Oleschko, J. Hertkorn, M. Sandor, P. Baum, Localization of coherent light into photons in a single- crystalline material. arXiv p. 2604.03148 (2026)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[26]

Morimoto, P

Y. Morimoto, P. Baum, Attosecond control of electron beams at dielectric and absorbing membranes. Physical Review A 97, 033815 (2018)

work page 2018
[27]

Kuttruff, J

J. Kuttruff, J. Holder, Y. Meng, P. Baum, Real-time electron clustering in an event-driven hybrid pixel detector. Ultramicroscopy 255, 113864 (2024). 10

work page 2024
[28]

G. M. Vanacore, I. Madan, G. Berruto, K. Wang, E. Pomarico, R. J. Lamb, D. McGrouther, I. Kaminer, B. Barwick, F. J. García de Abajo, F. Carbone, Attosecond coherent control of free-electron wave functions using semi-infinite light fields. Nature Communications 9, 2694 (2018)

work page 2018
[29]

Feist, S

A. Feist, S. V. Yalunin, S. Schäfer, C. Ropers, High-purity free-electron momentum states prepared by three-dimensional optical phase modulation. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043227 (2020)

work page 2020
[30]

K. S. Youngworth, T. G. Brown, Focusing of high numerical aperture cylindrical-vector beams. Opt. Express 7, 77–87 (2000)

work page 2000
[31]

Richards, E

B. Richards, E. Wolf, Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems, ii. structure of the im- age field in an aplanatic system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathemat- ical and Physical Sciences 253, 358-379 (1959)

work page 1959
[32]

Bautista, M

G. Bautista, M. Kauranen, Vector-field nonlinear microscopy of nanostructures. ACS Pho- tonics 3, 1351–1370 (2016)

work page 2016
[33]

R. Dorn, S. Quabis, G. Leuchs, Sharper focus for a radially polarized light beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 233901 (2003)

work page 2003
[34]

Morimoto, P

Y. Morimoto, P. Baum, Field-induced rocking-curve effects in attosecond electron diffrac- tion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 216902 (2024)

work page 2024
[35]

Tsarev, A

M. Tsarev, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Measurement of temporal coherence of free electrons by time-domain electron interferometry. Physical Review Letters 127, 165501 (2021)

work page 2021
[36]

K. E. Priebe, C. Rathje, S. V. Yalunin, T. Hohage, A. Feist, S. Schäfer, C. Ropers, Attosec- ond electron pulse trains and quantum state reconstruction in ultrafast transmission electron microscopy. Nature Photonics 11, 793–797 (2017)

work page 2017
[37]

Morimoto, P

Y. Morimoto, P. Baum, Diffraction and microscopy with attosecond electron pulse trains. Nature Physics 14, 252–256 (2018)

work page 2018
[38]

M. V. Tsarev, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Free-electron qubits and maximum-contrast attosecond pulses via temporal Talbot revivals. Physical Review Research 3, 043033 (2021)

work page 2021
[39]

Ehberger, A

D. Ehberger, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Tilted electron pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 094801 (2018)

work page 2018
[40]

Shpiro, R

T. Shpiro, R. Ruimy, Q. Yan, T. Bucher, A. Shultzman, H. H. Sheinfux, I. Kaminer, To- ward photon-induced near-field electron tomography. arXiv (2025)

work page 2025
[41]

Kirner, P

F. Kirner, P. Potapov, J. Schultz, J. Geppert, M. Müller, G. González-Rubio, S. Sturm, A. Lubk, E. Sturm, Additive-controlled synthesis of monodisperse single crystalline gold nanoparticles: interplay of shape and surface plasmon resonance. J. Mater. Chem. C 8, 10844-10851 (2020). 11

work page 2020
[42]

D. J. Schupp, J. Angst, E. A. Schaefer, S. M. Schupp, H. Cölfen, Controlling oriented at- tachment of gold nanoparticles by size and shape. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 20343–20350 (2021)

work page 2021
[43]

Hayazawa, Y

N. Hayazawa, Y. Inouye, Z. Sekkat, S. Kawata, Metallized tip amplification of near-field Raman scattering. Optics Communications 183, 333–336 (2000)

work page 2000
[44]

Bautista, M

G. Bautista, M. J. Huttunen, J. Mäkitalo, J. M. Kontio, J. Simonen, M. Kauranen, Second- harmonic generation imaging of metal nano-objects with cylindrical vector beams. Nano Lett. 12, 3207–3212 (2012)

work page 2012
[45]

Bautista, J

G. Bautista, J. Mäkitalo, Y. Chen, V. Dhaka, M. Grasso, L. Karvonen, H. Jiang, M. J. Huttunen, T. Huhtio, H. Lipsanen, M. Kauranen, Second-harmonic generation imaging of semiconductor nanowires with focused vector beams. Nano Lett. 15, 1564–1569 (2015)

work page 2015
[46]

Bauer, S

T. Bauer, S. Orlov, G. Leuchs, P. Banzer, Towards an optical far-field measurement of higher-order multipole contributions to the scattering response of nanoparticles. Applied Physics Letters 106, 091108 (2015)

work page 2015
[47]

Gangrskaia, T

E. Gangrskaia, T. Schachinger, C. Eisenmenger-Sittner, L. Grünewald, S. Mai, A. Bal- tuška, A. Pugžlys, A. Bellissimo, Probing optical magnetic dipole transitions in Eu3+ using structured light and nanoscale sample engineering. ACS Photonics 12, 6308–6317 (2025)

work page 2025
[48]

Y. Lu, Y. Xu, X. Ouyang, M. Xian, Y. Cao, K. Chen, X. Li, Cylindrical vector beams re- veal radiationless anapole condition in a resonant state. Opto-Electronic Advances 5, 210014-1-210014-7 (2022)

work page 2022
[49]

Y. Li, E. Valenton, S. Nagasamudram, J. Parker, M. Perez, U. Manna, M. Biswas, S. A. Rice, N. F. Scherer, Optical trapping with optical magnetic field and photonic Hall effect forces. Nature Communications 16, 10397 (2025)

work page 2025
[50]

K. J. Mohler, D. Ehberger, I. Gronwald, C. Lange, R. Huber, P. Baum, Ultrafast electron diffraction from nanophotonic waveforms via dynamical Aharonov-Bohm phases. Science Advances 6, eabc8804 (2020)

work page 2020
[51]

Feist, G

A. Feist, G. Huang, G. Arend, Y. Yang, J.-W. Henke, A. S. Raja, F. J. Kappert, R. N. Wang, H. Lourenço-Martins, Z. Qiu, J. Liu, O. Kfir, T. J. Kippenberg, C. Ropers, Cavity- mediated electron-photon pairs. Science 377, 777-780 (2022). 12 Fig. 1. Setup and vectorial focal fields. (a) In an ultrafast electron microscope, a laser beam (green) is polarization...

work page 2022

[1] [1]

C. Bula, K. T. McDonald, E. J. Prebys, C. Bamber, S. Boege, T. Kotseroglou, A. C. Melis- sinos, D. D. Meyerhofer, W. Ragg, D. L. Burke, R. C. Field, G. Horton-Smith, A. C. Odian, J. E. Spencer, D. Walz, S. C. Berridge, W. M. Bugg, K. Shmakov, A. W. Weide- mann, Observation of nonlinear effects in Compton scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3116– 3119 (1996). 8

work page 1996

[2] [2]

F. J. García de Abajo, M. Kociak, Electron energy-gain spectroscopy. New Journal of Physics 10, 073035 (2008)

work page 2008

[3] [3]

Barwick, D

B. Barwick, D. J. Flannigan, A. H. Zewail, Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy. Nature 462, 902–906 (2009)

work page 2009

[4] [4]

Y. Fang, J. Kuttruff, D. Nabben, P. Baum, Structured electrons with chiral mass and charge. Science 385, 183-187 (2024)

work page 2024

[5] [5]

A. H. Zewail, Four-dimensional electron microscopy. Science 328, 187–193 (2010)

work page 2010

[6] [6]

Nabben, J

D. Nabben, J. Kuttruff, L. Stolz, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Attosecond electron microscopy of sub-cycle optical dynamics. Nature 619, 63–67 (2023)

work page 2023

[7] [7]

R. J. England, R. J. Noble, K. Bane, D. H. Dowell, C.-K. Ng, J. E. Spencer, S. Tantawi, Z. Wu, R. L. Byer, E. Peralta, K. Soong, C.-M. Chang, B. Montazeri, S. J. Wolf, B. Cowan, J. Dawson, W. Gai, P. Hommelhoff, Y.-C. Huang, C. Jing, C. McGuinness, R. B. Palmer, B. Naranjo, J. Rosenzweig, G. Travish, A. Mizrahi, L. Schachter, C. Sears, G. R. Werner, R. B....

work page 2014

[8] [8]

Feist, K

A. Feist, K. E. Echternkamp, J. Schauss, S. V. Yalunin, S. Schäfer, C. Ropers, Quantum coherent optical phase modulation in an ultrafast transmission electron microscope. Nature 521, 200–203 (2015)

work page 2015

[9] [9]

Ruimy, A

R. Ruimy, A. Karnieli, I. Kaminer, Free-electron quantum optics. Nature Physics 21, 193– 200 (2025)

work page 2025

[10] [10]

Tziperman, D

O. Tziperman, D. Nabben, R. Ruimy, J. Holder, E. Nussinson, Y. Fang, A. Gorlach, D. Ka- zenwadel, A. Karnieli, I. Kaminer, P. Baum, Two-electron quantum walks for probing en- tanglement and decoherence in an electron microscope. Nature Physics (2026)

work page 2026

[11] [11]

P. Baum, A. H. Zewail, Attosecond electron pulses for 4D diffraction and microscopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 18409-18414 (2007)

work page 2007

[12] [12]

Kozák, T

M. Kozák, T. Eckstein, N. Schönenberger, P. Hommelhoff, Inelastic ponderomotive scat- tering of electrons at a high-intensity optical travelling wave in vacuum. Nature Physics 14, 121–125 (2018)

work page 2018

[13] [13]

Tsarev, J

M. Tsarev, J. W. Thurner, P. Baum, Nonlinear-optical quantum control of free-electron matter waves. Nature Physics 19, 1350–1354 (2023)

work page 2023

[14] [14]

F. O. Kirchner, A. Gliserin, F. Krausz, P. Baum, Laser streaking of free electrons at 25 keV. Nature Photonics 8, 52–57 (2014)

work page 2014

[15] [15]

Kealhofer, W

C. Kealhofer, W. Schneider, D. Ehberger, A. Ryabov, F. Krausz, P. Baum, All-optical con- trol and metrology of electron pulses. Science 352, 429–433 (2016). 9

work page 2016

[16] [16]

Bucher, H

T. Bucher, H. Nahari, H. Herzig Sheinfux, R. Ruimy, A. Niedermayr, R. Dahan, Q. Yan, Y. Adiv, M. Yannai, J. Chen, Y. Kurman, S. T. Park, D. J. Masiel, E. Janzen, J. H. Edgar, F. Carbone, G. Bartal, S. Tsesses, F. H. L. Koppens, G. M. Vanacore, I. Kaminer, Coher- ently amplified ultrafast imaging using a free-electron interferometer. Nature Photonics 18, 8...

work page 2024

[17] [17]

J. H. Gaida, H. Lourenço-Martins, M. Sivis, T. Rittmann, A. Feist, F. J. García de Abajo, C. Ropers, Attosecond electron microscopy by free-electron homodyne detection. Nature Photonics 18, 509–515 (2024)

work page 2024

[18] [18]

Piazza, T

L. Piazza, T. T. A. Lummen, E. Quiñonez, Y. Murooka, B. W. Reed, B. Barwick, F. Car- bone, Simultaneous observation of the quantization and the interference pattern of a plas- monic near-field. Nature Communications 6, 6407 (2015)

work page 2015

[19] [19]

K. Wang, R. Dahan, M. Shentcis, Y. Kauffmann, A. Ben Hayun, O. Reinhardt, S. Tsesses, I. Kaminer, Coherent interaction between free electrons and a photonic cavity. Nature 582, 50–54 (2020)

work page 2020

[20] [20]

O. Kfir, H. Lourenço-Martins, G. Storeck, M. Sivis, T. R. Harvey, T. J. Kippenberg, A. Feist, C. Ropers, Controlling free electrons with optical whispering-gallery modes. Na- ture 582, 46–49 (2020)

work page 2020

[21] [21]

Kuttruff, D

J. Kuttruff, D. Nabben, A.-C. Zimmermann, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Terahertz control and timing correlations in a transmission electron microscope. Science Advances 10, eadl6543 (2024)

work page 2024

[22] [22]

Kazenwadel, J

D. Kazenwadel, J. Holder, J. Kuttruff, P. Baum, Energy offset between femtosecond and thermal electrons in nanometer field-emitter tips. Phys. Rev. Appl. 24, 024021 (2025)

work page 2025

[23] [23]

Aidelsburger, F

M. Aidelsburger, F. O. Kirchner, F. Krausz, P. Baum, Single-electron pulses for ultrafast diffraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 19714–19719 (2010)

work page 2010

[24] [24]

Stalder, M

M. Stalder, M. Schadt, Linearly polarized light with axial symmetry generated by liquid- crystal polarization converters. Opt. Lett. 21, 1948–1950 (1996)

work page 1948

[25] [25]

Localization of coherent light into photons in a single-crystalline material

D. Kazenwadel, J. Holder, L. Ciorciaro, N. Neathery, R. Schwenzer, L. Oleschko, J. Hertkorn, M. Sandor, P. Baum, Localization of coherent light into photons in a single- crystalline material. arXiv p. 2604.03148 (2026)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[26] [26]

Morimoto, P

Y. Morimoto, P. Baum, Attosecond control of electron beams at dielectric and absorbing membranes. Physical Review A 97, 033815 (2018)

work page 2018

[27] [27]

Kuttruff, J

J. Kuttruff, J. Holder, Y. Meng, P. Baum, Real-time electron clustering in an event-driven hybrid pixel detector. Ultramicroscopy 255, 113864 (2024). 10

work page 2024

[28] [28]

G. M. Vanacore, I. Madan, G. Berruto, K. Wang, E. Pomarico, R. J. Lamb, D. McGrouther, I. Kaminer, B. Barwick, F. J. García de Abajo, F. Carbone, Attosecond coherent control of free-electron wave functions using semi-infinite light fields. Nature Communications 9, 2694 (2018)

work page 2018

[29] [29]

Feist, S

A. Feist, S. V. Yalunin, S. Schäfer, C. Ropers, High-purity free-electron momentum states prepared by three-dimensional optical phase modulation. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043227 (2020)

work page 2020

[30] [30]

K. S. Youngworth, T. G. Brown, Focusing of high numerical aperture cylindrical-vector beams. Opt. Express 7, 77–87 (2000)

work page 2000

[31] [31]

Richards, E

B. Richards, E. Wolf, Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems, ii. structure of the im- age field in an aplanatic system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathemat- ical and Physical Sciences 253, 358-379 (1959)

work page 1959

[32] [32]

Bautista, M

G. Bautista, M. Kauranen, Vector-field nonlinear microscopy of nanostructures. ACS Pho- tonics 3, 1351–1370 (2016)

work page 2016

[33] [33]

R. Dorn, S. Quabis, G. Leuchs, Sharper focus for a radially polarized light beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 233901 (2003)

work page 2003

[34] [34]

Morimoto, P

Y. Morimoto, P. Baum, Field-induced rocking-curve effects in attosecond electron diffrac- tion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 216902 (2024)

work page 2024

[35] [35]

Tsarev, A

M. Tsarev, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Measurement of temporal coherence of free electrons by time-domain electron interferometry. Physical Review Letters 127, 165501 (2021)

work page 2021

[36] [36]

K. E. Priebe, C. Rathje, S. V. Yalunin, T. Hohage, A. Feist, S. Schäfer, C. Ropers, Attosec- ond electron pulse trains and quantum state reconstruction in ultrafast transmission electron microscopy. Nature Photonics 11, 793–797 (2017)

work page 2017

[37] [37]

Morimoto, P

Y. Morimoto, P. Baum, Diffraction and microscopy with attosecond electron pulse trains. Nature Physics 14, 252–256 (2018)

work page 2018

[38] [38]

M. V. Tsarev, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Free-electron qubits and maximum-contrast attosecond pulses via temporal Talbot revivals. Physical Review Research 3, 043033 (2021)

work page 2021

[39] [39]

Ehberger, A

D. Ehberger, A. Ryabov, P. Baum, Tilted electron pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 094801 (2018)

work page 2018

[40] [40]

Shpiro, R

T. Shpiro, R. Ruimy, Q. Yan, T. Bucher, A. Shultzman, H. H. Sheinfux, I. Kaminer, To- ward photon-induced near-field electron tomography. arXiv (2025)

work page 2025

[41] [41]

Kirner, P

F. Kirner, P. Potapov, J. Schultz, J. Geppert, M. Müller, G. González-Rubio, S. Sturm, A. Lubk, E. Sturm, Additive-controlled synthesis of monodisperse single crystalline gold nanoparticles: interplay of shape and surface plasmon resonance. J. Mater. Chem. C 8, 10844-10851 (2020). 11

work page 2020

[42] [42]

D. J. Schupp, J. Angst, E. A. Schaefer, S. M. Schupp, H. Cölfen, Controlling oriented at- tachment of gold nanoparticles by size and shape. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 20343–20350 (2021)

work page 2021

[43] [43]

Hayazawa, Y

N. Hayazawa, Y. Inouye, Z. Sekkat, S. Kawata, Metallized tip amplification of near-field Raman scattering. Optics Communications 183, 333–336 (2000)

work page 2000

[44] [44]

Bautista, M

G. Bautista, M. J. Huttunen, J. Mäkitalo, J. M. Kontio, J. Simonen, M. Kauranen, Second- harmonic generation imaging of metal nano-objects with cylindrical vector beams. Nano Lett. 12, 3207–3212 (2012)

work page 2012

[45] [45]

Bautista, J

G. Bautista, J. Mäkitalo, Y. Chen, V. Dhaka, M. Grasso, L. Karvonen, H. Jiang, M. J. Huttunen, T. Huhtio, H. Lipsanen, M. Kauranen, Second-harmonic generation imaging of semiconductor nanowires with focused vector beams. Nano Lett. 15, 1564–1569 (2015)

work page 2015

[46] [46]

Bauer, S

T. Bauer, S. Orlov, G. Leuchs, P. Banzer, Towards an optical far-field measurement of higher-order multipole contributions to the scattering response of nanoparticles. Applied Physics Letters 106, 091108 (2015)

work page 2015

[47] [47]

Gangrskaia, T

E. Gangrskaia, T. Schachinger, C. Eisenmenger-Sittner, L. Grünewald, S. Mai, A. Bal- tuška, A. Pugžlys, A. Bellissimo, Probing optical magnetic dipole transitions in Eu3+ using structured light and nanoscale sample engineering. ACS Photonics 12, 6308–6317 (2025)

work page 2025

[48] [48]

Y. Lu, Y. Xu, X. Ouyang, M. Xian, Y. Cao, K. Chen, X. Li, Cylindrical vector beams re- veal radiationless anapole condition in a resonant state. Opto-Electronic Advances 5, 210014-1-210014-7 (2022)

work page 2022

[49] [49]

Y. Li, E. Valenton, S. Nagasamudram, J. Parker, M. Perez, U. Manna, M. Biswas, S. A. Rice, N. F. Scherer, Optical trapping with optical magnetic field and photonic Hall effect forces. Nature Communications 16, 10397 (2025)

work page 2025

[50] [50]

K. J. Mohler, D. Ehberger, I. Gronwald, C. Lange, R. Huber, P. Baum, Ultrafast electron diffraction from nanophotonic waveforms via dynamical Aharonov-Bohm phases. Science Advances 6, eabc8804 (2020)

work page 2020

[51] [51]

Feist, G

A. Feist, G. Huang, G. Arend, Y. Yang, J.-W. Henke, A. S. Raja, F. J. Kappert, R. N. Wang, H. Lourenço-Martins, Z. Qiu, J. Liu, O. Kfir, T. J. Kippenberg, C. Ropers, Cavity- mediated electron-photon pairs. Science 377, 777-780 (2022). 12 Fig. 1. Setup and vectorial focal fields. (a) In an ultrafast electron microscope, a laser beam (green) is polarization...

work page 2022