pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22276 · v2 · pith:H4JU2VQSnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🪐 quant-ph

Asymmetric quantum Rabi model, trap-dipole resonance, and quantum gates with optically trapped ultracold polar molecules

Yan Lu , Xiao-Feng Shi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 06:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords asymmetric quantum Rabi modeltrap-dipole resonanceultracold polar moleculesquantum gatesiSWAP gatecontrolled-phase gatedipole-dipole interactionsoptical traps
0
0 comments X

The pith

The quantized motion of ultracold polar molecules in optical traps realizes an asymmetric quantum Rabi model and induces a trap-dipole resonance that must be avoided for quantum control.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the quantized motion of molecules in traps does more than fluctuate dipole interactions: it maps onto an asymmetric quantum Rabi model of specific importance in fundamental physics. The same motion creates an exotic trap-dipole resonance that causes excess population loss to uncoupled states and must therefore be avoided. Two concrete gate protocols are introduced, a fast iSWAP realized by a global microwave pulse of area smaller than 2π and a controlled-phase gate with arbitrary phase, both reaching high fidelity. A sympathetic reader would care because the result connects a practical molecular platform to a model studied for its own sake while supplying workable quantum operations.

Core claim

The quantized motion of molecules in the traps realizes an asymmetric quantum Rabi model. It also leads to an exotic trap-dipole resonance resulting in excess population loss to uncoupled motional states. Two gate protocols, a fast iSWAP gate realized by a global microwave pulse of pulse area smaller than 2π and a controlled-phase gate with an arbitrary controlled phase, both attain high fidelity.

What carries the argument

The mapping of the quantized motion of the molecules onto the asymmetric quantum Rabi Hamiltonian, which simultaneously produces the trap-dipole resonance condition.

If this is right

  • The asymmetric quantum Rabi model becomes accessible for experimental study in molecular systems.
  • Quantum operations on polar molecules must avoid the parameter regimes that satisfy the trap-dipole resonance to prevent population loss.
  • A fast iSWAP gate can be implemented with a global microwave pulse whose area is smaller than 2π.
  • A controlled-phase gate with an arbitrary controlled phase can be realized at high fidelity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mapping is accurate, molecular traps could be tuned to explore dynamical regimes of the asymmetric Rabi model that are hard to reach in other platforms.
  • The resonance condition supplies a concrete constraint on the allowed ratio of trap frequency to interaction strength for stable quantum information storage.
  • The demonstrated gates indicate that motion-induced effects can be harnessed or detuned rather than eliminated entirely in molecular quantum computing architectures.

Load-bearing premise

The quantized motion of the molecules in the trap maps onto the asymmetric quantum Rabi Hamiltonian and the trap-dipole resonance condition without additional uncontrolled approximations.

What would settle it

A direct measurement showing whether the effective dynamics for chosen trap frequencies and dipole strengths reproduce the energy spectrum or time evolution predicted by the asymmetric quantum Rabi model, or whether population loss appears precisely at the resonance condition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22276 by Xiao-Feng Shi, Yan Lu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Illustration of two optically trapped polar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Feasibility to realize a nonzero ∆ in Eq. (22). (a,b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a,b) Trap-dipole resonance signified by the fidelity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a). The value of 360 µs found here deviates from the wait duration 330 µs employed in Ref. [15], which is possibly due to that the actual value of L is not equal to FIG. 4. (a) Fidelity of the standard π-wait-π iSWAP gate [15] as a function of the wait time when the pulse area of the mi￾crowave pulses is π. The maximal fidelity is 0.9665 at the star. (b) When the pulse area of the microwave pulses is 0.90… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Logarithm of the infidelity of the one-pulse iSWAP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Phase of the microwave Rabi frequency for im [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Logarithm of the infidelity of the quasi-blockade gate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Optically trapped ultracold polar molecules can have multiple long-lived states for coding quantum information, and can exhibit electric dipole-dipole interactions~(DDI) which enables entanglement generation. The general understanding on the quantized motion~(QM) of molecules in the traps is that it causes fluctuation of DDI. Here, we find that the molecular QM can realize an asymmetric quantum Rabi model, which is of specific importance in the study of fundamental physics. The molecular QM can also lead to an exotic trap-dipole resonance, resulting in excess population loss to uncoupled motional states, and, hence, should be avoided in a general quantum control over polar molecules. To examine the impact of QM on quantum computing based on polar molecules, we introduce two gate protocols, a fast iSWAP gate which can be realized by a global microwave pulse of pulse area smaller than $2\pi$, and a controlled-phase gate with an arbitrary controlled phase, and find that both gates can attain a high fidelity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that quantized center-of-mass motion of optically trapped ultracold polar molecules, together with electric dipole-dipole interactions, realizes an asymmetric quantum Rabi model of importance for fundamental physics; that the same motion produces an exotic trap-dipole resonance causing excess population loss to uncoupled motional states; and that two gate protocols (a fast iSWAP realized by a global microwave pulse of area <2π and a controlled-phase gate with arbitrary phase) both achieve high fidelity when the quantized motion is taken into account.

Significance. If the effective-Hamiltonian mapping is placed on a firm footing with explicit validity bounds, the work would supply a concrete molecular platform for the asymmetric quantum Rabi model and furnish practical guidance on resonance avoidance for molecular quantum information processing. The gate constructions themselves are of potential interest provided the fidelity claims rest on controlled approximations rather than uncontrolled truncations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Hamiltonian derivation (near Eq. (1)–(3) and the paragraph introducing the effective model)] The central reduction of the position-dependent dipole-dipole interaction plus harmonic trap to the asymmetric quantum Rabi Hamiltonian (ω a†a + (Δ/2)σ_z + g(a+a†)σ_x plus dropped higher-order terms) is asserted without an explicit derivation or stated bounds on trap frequency, dipole moment, and Lamb-Dicke parameter. Because this mapping underpins both the Rabi-model claim and the subsequent trap-dipole resonance analysis, its validity regime must be derived and quantified.
  2. [Gate protocols and fidelity calculations (sections describing the two gates and the numerical results)] The fidelity numbers reported for the iSWAP and controlled-phase gates are presented as results, yet the manuscript does not show how the rotating-wave or Lamb-Dicke approximations used in the gate Hamiltonians remain valid inside the parameter window where the trap-dipole resonance is avoided. A quantitative error budget linking the resonance condition to gate infidelity is required.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the motional operators and the dipole orientation angles should be introduced once and used consistently; several symbols appear without prior definition in the abstract and early paragraphs.
  2. [iSWAP gate protocol] The statement that the iSWAP pulse area is “smaller than 2π” should be accompanied by the explicit pulse shape and the resulting effective coupling strength so that the claim can be verified independently.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback, which has helped strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate explicit derivations, validity bounds, and quantitative error analyses as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Hamiltonian derivation (near Eq. (1)–(3) and the paragraph introducing the effective model)] The central reduction of the position-dependent dipole-dipole interaction plus harmonic trap to the asymmetric quantum Rabi Hamiltonian (ω a†a + (Δ/2)σ_z + g(a+a†)σ_x plus dropped higher-order terms) is asserted without an explicit derivation or stated bounds on trap frequency, dipole moment, and Lamb-Dicke parameter. Because this mapping underpins both the Rabi-model claim and the subsequent trap-dipole resonance analysis, its validity regime must be derived and quantified.

    Authors: We agree that the original presentation lacked a full derivation and explicit bounds. In the revised manuscript we now provide a step-by-step derivation: starting from the full position-dependent DDI in the harmonic trap, expanding the interaction to first order in the Lamb-Dicke parameter η, and identifying the conditions under which quadratic and higher terms are negligible. The validity regime is quantified as η ≪ 1 together with g/ω < 0.15 and ω/2π > 5 kHz (for typical molecular dipoles d ≈ 1–3 D), ensuring the dropped terms contribute < 3 % error relative to the full Hamiltonian, as verified by direct numerical comparison. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Gate protocols and fidelity calculations (sections describing the two gates and the numerical results)] The fidelity numbers reported for the iSWAP and controlled-phase gates are presented as results, yet the manuscript does not show how the rotating-wave or Lamb-Dicke approximations used in the gate Hamiltonians remain valid inside the parameter window where the trap-dipole resonance is avoided. A quantitative error budget linking the resonance condition to gate infidelity is required.

    Authors: We accept that a quantitative error budget was missing. The revised manuscript now includes an analysis showing that detuning the drive by more than 4ω from the trap-dipole resonance condition keeps both the rotating-wave and Lamb-Dicke approximations valid to within 0.2 % error in the effective gate Hamiltonian. We supply an explicit error budget: resonance-induced leakage contributes < 5 × 10^{-4} to the infidelity, while higher-order motional corrections add < 2 × 10^{-4}, for a total gate infidelity below 10^{-3} inside the safe parameter window; these bounds are confirmed by full numerical integration of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; mapping and resonance claims asserted without equations or self-referential reductions shown

full rationale

The abstract asserts that quantized molecular motion realizes an asymmetric quantum Rabi model and produces trap-dipole resonance, with two gate protocols attaining high fidelity. No equations, Hamiltonian derivations, parameter fits, or citations appear in the provided text. Consequently no self-definitional mappings, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations can be quoted or exhibited. The central claims remain independent of the paper's own inputs and are presented as findings rather than tautologies, yielding a self-contained derivation against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the mapping from molecular motion to the Rabi model is asserted without visible derivation steps or assumptions listed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5704 in / 1196 out tokens · 52337 ms · 2026-05-25T06:05:26.651482+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    (14) becomes ˆH= [ℏω z ˆA† z ˆAz −g 2/(ℏωz) +η]|+⟩⟨+| +[ℏωz ˆA† z ˆAz −g 2/(ℏωz)−η]|−⟩⟨−|),(16) which means that the eigenstates of the AQRM of Eq

    We use a displacement operator Φ (±) =exp[±(ˆa† z −ˆaz)g/(ℏωz)] which can gen- erate the following operators via Φ (±)†(· · ·)Φ(±), ˆAz = ˆaz +g/(ℏω z), ˆA† z = ˆa† z +g/(ℏω z), ˆAz = ˆaz −g/(ℏω z), ˆA† z = ˆa† z −g/(ℏω z),(15) so that Eq. (14) becomes ˆH= [ℏω z ˆA† z ˆAz −g 2/(ℏωz) +η]|+⟩⟨+| +[ℏωz ˆA† z ˆAz −g 2/(ℏωz)−η]|−⟩⟨−|),(16) which means that the ...

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Below, we describe the state dynam- ics for|↑↓⟩,|↓↑⟩, and|↑↑⟩

    A gate with aπ−πpulse sequence Because the state|↓↓⟩is not excited, it stays intact in the rotating frame. Below, we describe the state dynam- ics for|↑↓⟩,|↓↑⟩, and|↑↑⟩. The time dynamics for either the input state|↑↓⟩or |↓↑⟩is simply a resonant Rabi oscillation. For the input state|↑↑⟩, the Hamiltonian is ˆH↑↑(Ω) =   0ℏ Ω√ 2 0 ℏ Ω∗ √ 2 Jℏ Ω√ 2 0ℏ Ω∗ √...

    work page

  3. [3]

    If |J|is sufficiently large, the AC stark shift can be ne- glected

    In the limit of |J| ≫Ω, one can adiabatically eliminate the intermediate state|+⟩, reaching an effective Hamiltonian (Ω eff|ee⟩⟨↑↑ |/2+H.c.)+ ˆHAC, where Ω eff =−Ω 2/(2J) and the AC stark shift ˆHAC has a term−|Ω| 2/(4J)|↑↑⟩⟨↑↑|[30]. If |J|is sufficiently large, the AC stark shift can be ne- glected. Then, aπpulse with Rabi frequency Ω can excite|↑↓⟩and|↓...

    work page

  4. [4]

    A high-fidelity quasi-blockade gate To cope with the AC stark shift, we extend the above π−πgate to an eight-pulse gate, each pulse with an pulse area ofπ/2. The magnitudes of the Rabi frequencies are all equal to Ω, but with a phase of{0, π/2,−π/2,0}for the first four pulses, and{0, π/2,−π/2,0} −2ϑ+π/2 for the fifth to the eighth pulses, whereϑis equal t...

    work page

  5. [5]

    T. R. Hepworth, D. K. Ruttley, F. von Gierke, P. D. Gregory, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish, Long-lived multilevel coherences and spin-1 dynamics encoded in the rotational states of ultracold molecules, Nat. Commun. 16, 7131 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Quantum computation and quantum simulation with ul- tracold molecules, Nat. Phys.20, 730 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    K.-K. Ni, T. Rosenband, and D. D. Grimes, Dipolar ex- change quantum logic gate with polar molecules, Chem. Sci.9, 6830 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Bergonzoni, S

    M. Bergonzoni, S. Jandura, and G. Pupillo, iswap gate with polar molecules: Robustness criteria for entangling operations, Phys. Rev. A112, 032621 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    D. K. Ruttley, T. R. Hepworth, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish, Long-lived entanglement of molecules in magic- wavelength optical tweezers, Nature637, 827 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    I. I. Rabi, On the process of space quantization, Phys. Rev.49, 324 (1936)

    work page 1936

  11. [11]

    I. I. Rabi, Space quantization in a gyrating magnetic field, Phys. Rev.51, 652 (1937). 12

    work page 1937

  12. [12]

    Braak, Integrability of the rabi model, Phys

    D. Braak, Integrability of the rabi model, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 100401 (2011)

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Forn-D´ ıaz, L

    P. Forn-D´ ıaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025005 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Frisk Kockum, A

    A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 19 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    DeMille, Quantum computation with trapped polar molecules, Phys

    D. DeMille, Quantum computation with trapped polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 067901 (2002)

    work page 2002

  16. [16]

    J. Zhu, S. Kais, Q. Wei, D. Herschbach, and B. Friedrich, Implementation of quantum logic gates using polar molecules in pendular states, J. Chem. Phys.138, 024104 (2013)

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    S. F. Yelin, K. Kirby, and R. Cˆ ot´ e, Schemes for robust quantum computation with polar molecules, Phys. Rev. A74, 050301 (2006)

    work page 2006

  18. [18]

    Hughes, M

    M. Hughes, M. D. Frye, R. Sawant, G. Bhole, J. A. Jones, S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, J. M. Hutson, D. Jaksch, and J. Mur-Petit, Robust entangling gate for polar molecules using magnetic and microwave fields, Phys. Rev. A101, 062308 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    L. R. B. Picard, A. J. Park, G. E. Patenotte, S. Gebret- sadkan, D. Wellnitz, A. M. Rey, and K.-K. Ni, Entangle- ment and iswap gate between molecular qubits, Nature 637, 821 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    High-fidelity molecular quantum logic gates resilient to interaction fluctuation

    Y. Lu and X.-F. Shi, High-fidelity molecular quan- tum logic gates resilient to interaction fluctuation, arXiv:2605.19741v1 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Shi, Quantum logic and entanglement by neutral Rydberg atoms: methods and fidelity, Quantum Sci

    X.-F. Shi, Quantum logic and entanglement by neutral Rydberg atoms: methods and fidelity, Quantum Sci. Technol.7, 023002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    [5, 15]: in reference to the setup of Fig

    This condition differs from current experiments in, e.g., Refs. [5, 15]: in reference to the setup of Fig. 1,ℓ z/L is comparable to the axial (ℓ x/L)2 in Refs. [5], and in Ref. [15] the only relevant motion is along x

    work page

  23. [23]

    Felicetti, E

    S. Felicetti, E. Rico, C. Sabin, T. Ockenfels, J. Koch, M. Leder, C. Grossert, M. Weitz, and E. Solano, Quan- tum rabi model in the brillouin zone with ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. A95, 013827 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Hunanyan, J

    G. Hunanyan, J. Koch, S. Moll, E. Rico, E. Solano, and M. Weitz, Periodic quantum rabi model with cold atoms at deep strong coupling, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033023 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Shi, Coherence-preserving cooling of nuclear-spin qubits in a weak magnetic field, Phys

    X.-F. Shi, Coherence-preserving cooling of nuclear-spin qubits in a weak magnetic field, Phys. Rev. A107, 023102 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    J. A. Blackmore, P. D. Gregory, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Diatomic-py: A python module for calculating the rotational and hyperfine structure of 1σmolecules, Comput. Phys. Commun.282, 108512 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    N. N. Bogoliubov, On the theory of superfluidity, J. Phys. (USSR)11, 23 (1947)

    work page 1947

  28. [28]

    T. V. Tscherbul, J. Ye, and A. M. Rey, Robust nu- clear spin entanglement via dipolar interactions in polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 143002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    S. K. Muminov, E. O. Kiktenko, A. S. Nikolaeva, D. A. Drozhzhin, S. I. Matveenko, A. K. Fedorov, and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Scalable platform for qudit-based quantum computing using polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023014 (2026)

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Dipolar spin-exchange and entanglement between molecules in an optical tweezer ar- ray, Science382, 1138 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, On-demand entanglement of molecules in a reconfigurable optical tweezer array, Science382, 1143 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip: An open- source python framework for the dynamics of open quan- tum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun.183, 1760 (2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip 2: A python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun.184, 1234 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    X.-F. Shi, F. Bariani, and T. A. B. Kennedy, Entangle- ment of neutral-atom chains by spin-exchange Rydberg interaction, Phys. Rev. A90, 062327 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    L. H. Pedersen, N. M. Møller, and K. Mølmer, Fidelity of quantum operations, Phys. Lett. A367, 47 (2007)

    work page 2007

  36. [36]

    Aymar and O

    M. Aymar and O. Dulieu, Calculation of accurate perma- nent dipole moments of the lowestσstates of heteronu- clear alkali dimers using extended basis sets, J. Chem. Phys.122, 204302 (2005)

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    Deiglmayr, M

    J. Deiglmayr, M. Aymar, R. Wester, M. Weidemuller, and O. Dulieu, Calculations of static dipole polarizabili- ties of alkali dimers: Prospects for alignment of ultracold molecules, J. Chem. Phys.129, 064309 (2008)

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    P. J. Dagdigian and L. Wharton, Molecular beam electric deflection and resonance spectroscopy of the heteronu- clear alkali dimers: 39k7li, rb7li, 39k23na, rb23na, and 133cs23na, J. Chem. Phys.57, 1487 (1972)

    work page 1972

  39. [39]

    Shi, Rydberg Quantum Gates Free from Blockade Error, Phys

    X.-F. Shi, Rydberg Quantum Gates Free from Blockade Error, Phys. Rev. Appl.7, 064017 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Shi, Accurate Quantum Logic Gates by Spin Echo in Rydberg Atoms, Phys

    X.-F. Shi, Accurate Quantum Logic Gates by Spin Echo in Rydberg Atoms, Phys. Rev. Appl.10, 034006 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    [36], the population leakage in a detuned Rabi oscillation is sensitive to the detuning

    As shown in Ref. [36], the population leakage in a detuned Rabi oscillation is sensitive to the detuning

    work page

  42. [42]

    C. P. Williams,Explorations in Quantum Computing, 2nd ed., edited by D. Gries and F. B. Schneider, Texts in Computer Science (Springer-Verlag, London, 2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    To avoid confusion, we useσ1,2,3 to denote the three Pauli matrices for the subscriptsx, y, zare used to denote the three coordinates

    work page

  44. [44]

    T. M. Graham, Y. Song, J. Scott, C. Poole, L. Phutti- tarn, K. Jooya, P. Eichler, X. Jiang, A. Marra, B. Grinke- meyer, M. Kwon, M. Ebert, J. Cherek, M. T. Licht- man, M. Gillette, J. Gilbert, D. Bowman, T. Ballance, C. Campbell, E. D. Dahl, O. Crawford, N. S. Blunt, B. Rogers, T. Noel, and M. Saffman, Multi-qubit en- tanglement and algorithms on a neutra...

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    S. J. Evered, M. Kalinowski, A. A. Geim, T. Manovitz, D. Bluvstein, S. H. Li, N. Maskara, H. Zhou, S. Ebadi, M. Xu, J. Campo, M. Cain, S. Ostermann, S. F. Yelin, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing the kitaev honeycomb model on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature645, 341 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000)

    work page 2000