pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22294 · v1 · pith:INJ4N6DYnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Odd-Parity Chiral Magnons in Collinear Antiferromagnetic Multiferroics: Symmetry Classification and Ferroelectric Switching

Quanchao Du , Zhenlong Zhang Yuanjun Jin , Rui Li , Haibo Xie , Jinlian Lu , Zhe Wang , Zhijun Jiang , Lei Zhang
show 1 more author
Jinyang Ni
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 04:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords antiferromagnetic multiferroicschiral magnonsDzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactionferroelectric switchingodd-parity magnonsmagnon Hall effectmagnetoelectric couplingspin wave theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

In collinear antiferromagnetic multiferroics, intra-sublattice Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction induces odd-parity chiral magnons reversible by ferroelectric switching.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper identifies a class of collinear antiferromagnetic multiferroics in which the intra-sublattice Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction induces odd-parity chiral magnons. These magnons can be reversed through ferroelectric switching because of the magnetoelectric coupling. This setup allows non-volatile control over magnon spin splitting, Hall transport, and spin polarization in antiferromagnetic insulators, leveraging the charge-neutral nature of magnons. Symmetry analysis reveals three planar odd-parity forms for the chiral splitting with Néel vector dependence, and DFT calculations support material candidates from two-dimensional to bulk systems.

Core claim

Intra-sublattice Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in collinear antiferromagnetic multiferroics induces odd-parity chiral magnons that adopt f-wave, p-wave, and fully-gapped planar forms depending on the Néel vector, and these can be switched reversibly by ferroelectric polarization to enable non-volatile magnetoelectric control of magnon properties.

What carries the argument

Intra-sublattice Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction that breaks inversion symmetry in a way that produces odd-parity chiral magnon splitting, coupled to the ferroelectric order parameter for switching.

If this is right

  • Non-volatile ferroelectric control of magnon spin splitting in antiferromagnetic insulators.
  • Control of magnon Hall transport and spin polarization via electric fields.
  • Realization of such effects in identified two-dimensional and bulk material candidates.
  • Magnetic group analysis classifies the splitting into f-wave, p-wave, and fully-gapped odd-parity types.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such systems could lead to magnon-based spintronic devices with low dissipation and electric control.
  • Extensions to other multiferroic antiferromagnets might reveal similar chiral magnon phenomena if intra-sublattice DMI is present.
  • Potential for combining with spintronics to achieve electric-field tunable magnon transport without current.

Load-bearing premise

That collinear antiferromagnetic order coexists with ferroelectricity in the material candidates such that the intra-sublattice DMI produces dominant odd-parity magnon splitting without interference from other interactions.

What would settle it

Experimental measurement showing no reversal of magnon chirality or spin splitting upon ferroelectric switching in the proposed material candidates would falsify the predicted control mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22294 by Haibo Xie, Jinlian Lu, Jinyang Ni, Lei Zhang, Quanchao Du, Rui Li, Zhenlong Zhang Yuanjun Jin, Zhe Wang, Zhijun Jiang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Realizing odd-parity chiral magnons in layered antiferromagnets. Side view of bilayer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The isoenergy surfaces for odd-parity chiral magnon bands at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Easy-axis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Easy-plane magnons and ferroelectric switching. (a) The magnon bands weighted by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Odd-parity chiral magnon splitting in material candidates. (a) Crystal and magnetic structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The coupling between ferroelectrics and magnetism presents a promising avenue for low-dissipation spintronic devices. However, such couplings remain rare, and the direct realization of magnetic order driven by ferroelectric switching in insulators continues to pose a significant challenge. Here, we identify a class of collinear antiferromagnetic multiferroics in which intra-sublattice Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) induces odd-parity chiral magnons that are reversible via ferroelectric switching. Leveraging the charge-neutral nature of magnons, such multiferroics enable non-volatile ferroelectric control over magnon spin splitting, Hall transport, and spin polarization in antiferromagnetic insulators. Remarkably, magnetic group analysis and spin wave calculations reveal that the chiral splitting adopts three planar odd-parity forms, f-wave, p-wave, and fully-gapped types, with an intriguing N\'eel vector dependence. Furthermore, density functional theory calculations validate various material candidates, ranging from two-dimensional to bulk systems. Our work provides new insights into the realization of odd-parity chiral magnons in collinear antiferromagnets and opens new avenues for magnetoelectric coupling mechanisms in multiferroics

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript identifies a class of collinear antiferromagnetic multiferroics in which intra-sublattice Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction induces odd-parity chiral magnons that are reversible via ferroelectric switching. Magnetic group analysis and spin-wave calculations on a model Hamiltonian reveal three planar odd-parity forms (f-wave, p-wave, and fully gapped) with Néel vector dependence. DFT calculations are used to validate material candidates ranging from 2D to bulk systems, enabling non-volatile ferroelectric control over magnon spin splitting, Hall transport, and spin polarization in antiferromagnetic insulators.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a symmetry-based route to ferroelectric control of magnon chirality and transport properties in collinear antiferromagnets. The classification of odd-parity magnon splitting and the proposal of specific material candidates represent a useful advance for magnetoelectric coupling mechanisms, with potential implications for low-dissipation spintronic devices.

major comments (1)
  1. The DFT validation of material candidates focuses on structural relaxation and polarization. To support the central claim that collinear AFM order coexists stably with ferroelectricity and that intra-sublattice DMI dominates to produce the predicted odd-parity magnon splitting, explicit total-energy comparisons across multiple magnetic configurations (collinear AFM versus FM, spiral, or canted states) are required; without these, the applicability of the predicted reversible magnon properties to the real materials remains unconfirmed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and for the constructive major comment. We address the point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional calculations as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The DFT validation of material candidates focuses on structural relaxation and polarization. To support the central claim that collinear AFM order coexists stably with ferroelectricity and that intra-sublattice DMI dominates to produce the predicted odd-parity magnon splitting, explicit total-energy comparisons across multiple magnetic configurations (collinear AFM versus FM, spiral, or canted states) are required; without these, the applicability of the predicted reversible magnon properties to the real materials remains unconfirmed.

    Authors: We agree that explicit total-energy comparisons across magnetic configurations would provide stronger validation for the stability of the collinear AFM order in the proposed candidates and for the dominance of intra-sublattice DMI. In the revised manuscript we have added these calculations for representative 2D and bulk materials. The new results show that the collinear AFM configuration is the ground state relative to FM, spiral, and canted states, with energy differences that support coexistence with ferroelectricity. We have also extracted the DMI parameters from the DFT data to confirm that the intra-sublattice term is the leading contribution responsible for the odd-parity magnon splitting. These additions appear in a new subsection with accompanying tables and figures, and the discussion of material applicability has been updated accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained via symmetry and DFT

full rationale

The paper derives odd-parity chiral magnon forms (f-wave, p-wave, gapped) from magnetic group analysis applied to a model Hamiltonian with intra-sublattice DMI, then validates material candidates via standard DFT structural and polarization calculations. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter defined by the same data, nor relies on load-bearing self-citation or ansatz smuggled from prior work. The central claims follow directly from symmetry classification and spin-wave theory without circular reduction to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard assumptions of magnetic group theory and DFT applicability to multiferroics; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Magnetic point group symmetry governs the allowed forms of magnon dispersion in collinear antiferromagnets.
    Invoked for classifying f-wave, p-wave, and gapped odd-parity splittings.
  • domain assumption Intra-sublattice DMI is the dominant interaction producing chiral magnons in the proposed structures.
    Central to linking DMI to odd-parity magnons reversible by ferroelectric switching.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5775 in / 1429 out tokens · 42006 ms · 2026-05-22T04:59:36.262711+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Baltz, A

    V . Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y . Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Ramesh and N

    R. Ramesh and N. A. Spaldin, Multiferroics: progress and prospects in thin films, Nat. Mater.6, 21 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Fiebig, T

    M. Fiebig, T. Lottermoser, D. Meier, and M. Trassin, The evolution of multiferroics, Nat. Rev. Mater.1, 16046 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Schmid, Multi-ferroic magnetoelectrics, Ferroelectrics162, 317 (1994)

    H. Schmid, Multi-ferroic magnetoelectrics, Ferroelectrics162, 317 (1994)

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    N. A. Spaldin, S.-W. Cheong, and R. Ramesh, Multiferroics: Past, present, and future, Phys. Today63, 38 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    C. Xu, P. Chen, H. Tan, Y . Yang, H. Xiang, and L. Bellaiche, Electric-field switching of magnetic topological charge in type-I multiferroics, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 037203 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    B. B. Van Aken, T. T. M. Palstra, A. Filippetti, and N. A. Spaldin, The origin of ferroelectricity in magnetoelectric YMnO3, Nat. Mater.3, 164 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Kimura, T

    T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T. Arima, and Y . Tokura, Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization, Nature426, 55 (2003)

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    Q. Song, C. A. Occhialini, E. Ergec ¸en, B. Ilyas, D. Amoroso, P. Barone, J. Kapeghian, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. S. Botana, S. Picozzi, N. Gedik, and R. Comin, Evidence for a single-layer van der Waals multiferroic, Nature602, 601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Ponet, S

    L. Ponet, S. Artyukhin, T. Kain, J. Wettstein, A. Pimenov, A. Shuvaev, X. Wang, S.-W. Cheong, M. Mostovoy, and A. Pimenov, Topologically protected magnetoelectric switching in a multiferroic, Nature607, 81 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    S. Dong, H. Xiang, and E. Dagotto, Magnetoelectricity in multiferroics: a theoretical perspective, Nat. Sci. Rev.6, 629 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    J. Wang, J. B. Neaton, H. Zheng, V . Nagarajan, S. B. Ogale, B. Liu, D. Viehland, V . Vaithyanathan, D. G. Schlom, U. V . Waghmare, N. A. Spaldin, K. M. Rabe, M. Wuttig, and R. Ramesh, Epitaxial BiFeO3 multiferroic thin film heterostructures, Science299, 1719 (2003)

    work page 2003

  13. [13]

    J. Y . Ni, P. S. Wang, J. L. Lu, and H. J. Xiang, Realizing magnetoelectric coupling with hydrogen intercalation, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 117601 (2019). 12

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Malashevich and D

    A. Malashevich and D. Vanderbilt, First principles study of improper ferroelectricity in TbMnO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 037210 (2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    H. J. Xiang, S.-H. Wei, M.-H. Whangbo, and J. L. F. Da Silva, Spin-orbit coupling and ion displacements in multiferroic TbMnO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 037209 (2008)

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Hayami, H

    S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, and Y . Motome, Asymmetric magnon excitation by spontaneous toroidal ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.85, 053705 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Y . Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Twisted magnetic van der Waals bilayers: An ideal platform for altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    R. He, D. Wang, N. Luo, J. Zeng, K.-Q. Chen, and L.-M. Tang, Nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling in antiferromagnetic twisted bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 046401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y . Liu, Z. Zhang, I. ˇZuti´c, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric altermagnets: Antiferroelectricity alters magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    M. Gu, Y . Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y . Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switchable altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106802 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    W. Zhao, X. Zhou, Z. Guo, T. Zhu, J. Chen, H. Li, Z. Cheng, X. Wang, and W. Wang, Multiferroic phase transition between multiple types of collinear compensated magnets, Nat. Commun. (2026)

    work page 2026

  24. [24]

    W. Sun, C. Yang, X. Wang, S. Huang, and Z. Cheng, Altermagnetic multiferroics with symmetry-locked magnetoelectric coupling, Nat. Mater. (2026)

    work page 2026

  25. [25]

    Z. Zhu, X. Duan, J. Zhang, B. Hao, I. Zutic, and T. Zhou, Two-dimensional ferroelectric altermagnets: From model to material realization, Nano Lett.25, 9456 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Wang, W.-W

    S. Wang, W.-W. Wang, J. Fan, X. Zhou, X.-P. Li, and L. Wang, Two-dimensional dual-switchable ferroelectric altermagnets: altering electrons and magnons, Nano Lett.25, 14618 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y . Zhu, Y . Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y . Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representation theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Jiang, Z

    Y . Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X14, 031039 (2024). 13

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y . Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Q. N. Meier, A. Carta, C. Ederer, and A. Cano, Net and compensated altermagnetism from staggered orbital order: Layer-dependent spin splitting in Srn+1CrnO3n+1, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 116705 (2026)

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    I. I. Mazin, How to define and calculate the degree of spin polarization in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1427 (1999)

    work page 1999

  32. [32]

    Berakdar, Probing the spin polarization in ferromagnets, Phys

    J. Berakdar, Probing the spin polarization in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 5150 (1999)

    work page 1999

  33. [33]

    A. V . Chumak, V . I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys.11, 453 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. Gonz´alez-Hern´andez, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O.ˇSipr, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Chiral magnons in altermagneticRuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 256703 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Solids4, 241 (1958)

    work page 1958

  36. [36]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev.120, 91 (1960)

    work page 1960

  37. [37]

    J. Ni, Y . Jin, Q. Du, and G. Chang, Magnon nonlinearHall effect in two-dimensional antiferromagnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. B112, 054424 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Cheng, S

    R. Cheng, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Spin Nernst effect of magnons in collinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 217202 (2016)

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    V . A. Zyuzin and A. A. Kovalev, Magnon spinNernst effect in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 217203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Bai, R.-W

    L. Bai, R.-W. Zhang, W. Feng, and Y . Yao, AnomalousHall effect in type IV 2D collinear magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 036702 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Liu, S.-D

    Y . Liu, S.-D. Guo, Y . Li, and C.-C. Liu, Two-dimensional fully compensated ferrimagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 116703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev.58, 1098 (1940)

    work page 1940

  43. [43]

    N. N. Bogoljubov, V . V . Tolmachov, and D. V .ˇSirkov, A new method in the theory of superconductivity, Fortschr. Phys.6, 605 (1958)

    work page 1958

  44. [44]

    J. G. Valatin, Comments on the theory of superconductivity, Nuovo. Cim.7, 843 (1958). 14

    work page 1958

  45. [45]

    Q. Du, Z. Zhang, J. Ni, Z. Jiang, and L. Bellaiche, Nonreciprocal magnons in layered antiferromagnets VPX3 (X = S, Se, Te), Phys. Rev. B112, L100408 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Matsumoto and S

    T. Matsumoto and S. Hayami, Nonreciprocal magnons due to symmetric anisotropic exchange interaction in honeycomb antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B101, 224419 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    T. J. Sato and K. Matan, Nonreciprocal magnons in noncentrosymmetric magnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 081007 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Gitgeatpong, Y

    G. Gitgeatpong, Y . Zhao, P. Piyawongwatthana, Y . Qiu, L. W. Harriger, N. P. Butch, T. J. Sato, and K. Matan, Nonreciprocal magnons and symmetry-breaking in the noncentrosymmetric antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 047201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    for (i) the derivation of the Berry curvature and (ii) the results of the DFT calculations and bilayer fully antiferromagnets

    See Supplemental Material at ... for (i) the derivation of the Berry curvature and (ii) the results of the DFT calculations and bilayer fully antiferromagnets

    work page

  50. [50]

    Kawano, Y

    M. Kawano, Y . Onose, and C. Hotta, Designing Rashba–Dresselhaus effect in magnetic insulators, Commun. Phys.2, 27 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Okuma, Magnon spin-momentum locking: Various spin vortices and Dirac magnons in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Phys

    N. Okuma, Magnon spin-momentum locking: Various spin vortices and Dirac magnons in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 107205 (2017)

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    R. R. Neumann, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, R. Zarzuela, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and A. Mook, Odd-parity- wave magnons and nonrelativistic thermal Edelstein effect, preprint arXiv:2603.05415 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    D. Xiao, M. C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  54. [54]

    W. F. Brinkman and R. J. Elliott, Theory of spin-space groups, Proc. R. Soc. A294, 343 (1966)

    work page 1966

  55. [55]

    Matsumoto and S

    R. Matsumoto and S. Murakami, Theoretical prediction of a rotating magnon wave packet in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 197202 (2011)

    work page 2011

  56. [56]

    Onose, T

    Y . Onose, T. Ideue, H. Katsura, Y . Shiomi, N. Nagaosa, and Y . Tokura, Observation of the magnonHall effect, Science329, 297 (2010)

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    Q. Cui, B. Zeng, P. Cui, T. Yu, and H. Yang, Efficient spinSeebeck and spin Nernst effects of magnons in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B108, L180401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    K. Wu, J. Dong, M. Zhu, F. Zheng, and J. Zhang, Magnon splitting and magnon spin transport in altermagnets, Chin. Phys. Lett.42, 070702 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    B. Li, A. Mook, A. Raeliarijaona, and A. A. Kovalev, Magnonic analog of the Edelstein effect in antiferromagnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. B101, 024427 (2020). 15

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    M. J. Grzybowski, C. Autieri, J. Domagala, C. Krasucki, A. Kaleta, S. Kret, K. Gas, M. Sawicki, R. Bo ˙zek, J. Suffczy ´nski, and W. Pacuski, Wurtzite vs. rock-salt MnSe epitaxy: electronic and altermagnetic properties, Nanoscale16, 6259 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Bezzerga, I

    D. Bezzerga, I. Khan, and J. Hong, High performance room temperature multiferroic properties of w-MnSe altermagnet, Adv. Funct. Mater.35, 2505813 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Zhou, H.-M

    Y . Zhou, H.-M. Zhang, C.-A. Ji, H. Xiang, S. Dong, J. M. Rondinelli, and X.-Z. Lu, Piezomagnetism- driven magnetoelectric coupling in altermagnetic multiferroic K3Cr2F7, Phys. Rev. B112, 094412 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Xu, X.-Z

    K. Xu, X.-Z. Lu, and H. Xiang, Designing new ferroelectrics with a general strategy, npj Quant. Mater. 2, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  64. [64]

    H. Tan, M. Li, H. Liu, Z. Liu, Y . Li, and W. Duan, Two-dimensional ferromagnetic-ferroelectric multiferroics in violation of thed 0 rule, Phys. Rev. B99, 195434 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Q. Song, S. Stavri ´c, P. Barone, A. Droghetti, D. S. Antonenko, J. W. Venderbos, C. A. Occhialini, B. Ilyas, E. Ergec ¸en, N. Gedik, S.-W. Cheong, R. M. Fernandes, S. Picozzi, and R. Comin, Electrical switching of ap-wave magnet, Nature642, 64 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Priessnitz, A

    J. Priessnitz, A. B. Hellenes, R. Comin, and L. ˇSmejkal, Ferroelectric p-wave magnets, preprint arXiv:2603.19107 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    Matsumoto, R

    R. Matsumoto, R. Shindou, and S. Murakami, Thermal Hall effect of magnons in magnets with dipolar interaction, Phys. Rev. B89, 054420 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    Katsura, N

    H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and P. A. Lee, Theory of the thermal Hall effect in quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 066403 (2010)

    work page 2010

  69. [69]

    P. E. Bl ¨ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    work page 1994

  70. [70]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm ¨uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comp. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996)

    work page 1996

  71. [71]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev, Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  72. [72]

    A. I. Liechtenstein, V . I. Anisimov, and J. Zaanen, Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators, Phys. Rev. B52, R5467 (1995)

    work page 1995

  73. [73]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B47, 1651(R) (1993). 16

    work page 1993

  74. [74]

    H. J. Xiang, E. J. Kan, S.-H. Wei, M.-H. Whangbo, and X. G. Gong, Predicting the spin-lattice order of frustrated systems from first principles, Phys. Rev. B84, 224429 (2011)

    work page 2011

  75. [75]

    Xiang, C

    H. Xiang, C. Lee, H.-J. Koo, X. Gong, and M.-H. Whangbo, Magnetic properties and energy-mapping analysis, Dalton Trans.42, 823 (2013)

    work page 2013

  76. [76]

    Henkelman, B

    G. Henkelman, B. P. Uberuaga, and H. J´onsson, A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths, J. Chem. Phys.113, 9901 (2000). 17 FIG. 1. Realizing odd-parity chiral magnons in layered antiferromagnets. Side view of bilayer antiferromagnets with P preserved (a) and P broken (d) , where blue balls refer to th...

    work page 2000