Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Generation of Quantum Turbulence by Neutrino Cooling in Neutron Stars

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Neutrino cooling through a neutron star's superfluid transition generates a random tangle of quantized vortex lines and loops — quantum turbulence — with areal densities up to 10^7 times the Crab pulsar's equilibrium rotational vortex densi

desk verdict A legitimate first application of KZ scaling to neutron star cooling; the turbulence claim is plausible but rests on an unverified prefactor and a scalar-order-parameter leap. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.22768 v3 pith:FUKDS6DO submitted 2026-05-21 astro-ph.HE cond-mat.supr-con

J. A. Sauls This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEcond-mat.supr-con
keywords neutronstarssuperfluidityKibble-ZurekmechanismquantumvorticesturbulenceneutrinocoolingUrcaprocessCooperpairfluctuations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Neutron stars are born hot and cool rapidly by neutrino emission, and this paper argues that this cooling pushes the interior neutron superfluid through its transition temperature out of equilibrium. Because causal patches of condensate form independently with random phases, some phase windings survive annealing and become quantized vortex lines and loops. The paper applies the Kibble-Zurek mechanism to neutron-star conditions and finds, for every pairing-gap and neutrino-cooling model it studies, vortex areal densities 10^1 to 10^7 times the dilute equilibrium vortex density set by Crab-like rotation. If the claim holds, the young neutron-star interior is not a smooth, nearly uniform rotating superfluid but a churning three-dimensional vortex tangle — quantum turbulence — with implications for pulsar spin-down, timing noise, and core cooling.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the retarded Cooper-pair fluctuation propagator γ^R(Q,ω), whose pole near T_c defines both the diverging equilibrium correlation length ξ(T)=ξ0/|1−T/Tc|^{1/2} and relaxation time τ(T)=τ0/|1−T/Tc|. Imposing the quench trajectory T(t)=Tc−t/τ_Q and asking when the remaining quench time equals the relaxation time gives the KZ freeze-out time t̂=(τ_Q τ0)^{1/2} and the patch scale ξ̂=ξ0(τ_Q/τ0)^{1/4}; the mean areal vortex density n_v^KZ=f/ξ̂^2 is the scaling identity that carries the prediction. The prefactor f, the probability that a patch carries a non-removable ±2π phase winding, is the one parameter not derived from first principles; the paper treats it as system-sp

What would settle it

Run a dynamical simulation of the 3P2 spin-triplet order parameter quenched through T_c on a neutrino-cooling trajectory and count the number and topology of defects at freeze-out. If f comes out below 10^-3, or if the surviving defects are point-like rather than line-like, Eq. (25) no longer delivers the claimed densities. On the observational side, a search for spin-down anomalies or timing-noise onset in young neutron stars whose core cooling channel and T_c are known would test the macroscopic consequence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the finite neutrino-cooling rate across T_c fixes the vortex density left behind in the neutron condensate through the Kibble-Zurek mechanism. Starting from the Cooper-pair fluctuation propagator, the freeze-out scale is ξ̂ = ξ0(τ_Q/τ0)^{1/4}, leading to the scaling law n_v^KZ = f ξ0^{-2}(τ0/τ_Q)^{1/2}; f is the fraction of freeze-out patches that contain a ±2π phase winding, a non-universal quantity taken in the range 10^{-3} to 10^{-1}. Evaluating the quench time τ_Q from direct Urca and modified Urca cooling and T_c from 1S0 and 3P2 pairing-gap models, the paper obtains areal vortex densities 10^1 to 10^7 times the Feynman-Onsager density for the Crab pul

Load-bearing premise

The result stands on assuming that the prefactor f — calibrated in scalar-field defect simulations and treated by the paper as non-universal — and the mean-field exponents ν=1/2, z=2 carry over to the multicomponent 3P2 neutron superfluid; if f is even an order of magnitude below 10^-3, or if the multicomponent order parameter resists line formation, the predicted densities fall to the equilibrium rotational density and the turbulence claim fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A young neutron-star core is predicted to begin its superfluid life as a dense, disordered KZ vortex tangle rather than the dilute, rotation-aligned array assumed in standard models.
  • Because n_v^KZ is a mean areal density for any 2D section, the defect ensemble in 3D is a random network of vortex lines and loops — not a family of parallel rectilinear vortices.
  • Even in the most conservative case examined — modified Urca cooling with a reduced 3P2 gap — the KZ density remains orders of magnitude above the rotational vortex density over most of the inner core.
  • The tangle coarsens and decays over time, so early pulsar spin-down, vortex pinning, annihilation and reconnection, and possibly timing noise should carry traces of the nonequilibrium transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the 3P2 order parameter is a multicomponent spin-2 tensor, not a scalar complex field; if its multicomponent dynamics suppress line-forming windings, the defect census could change even though the scaling law may survive. A faithful multicomponent KZ simulation is the clean way to test this.
  • Editorial extension: the same quench logic applies to the proton superconductor transition in the core; a KZ-generated flux-line tangle would feed magnetic-field evolution and could leave an earlier signature than the neutron vortex tangle.
  • Editorial extension: if the KZ tangle relaxes on timescales of years to decades, then the onset of pulsar timing noise or glitch activity should correlate with the local transition temperature and cooling channel; this provides an observational program that is not spelled out in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper argues that the rapid neutrino cooling of a young neutron star acts as a Kibble-Zurek (KZ) quench for the neutron superfluid transition. Starting from the Bethe-Salpeter propagator for Cooper-pair fluctuations, the author derives a time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau-like relaxation rate, the freeze-out time, and the areal vortex density n_v^KZ = f ξ0^{-2}(τ0/τQ)^{1/2} (Eq. 25). This density is evaluated for direct Urca and modified Urca cooling and for 1S0 and 3P2 pairing gaps from several nuclear potentials. The resulting KZ vortex density is found to exceed the Crab pulsar rotational vortex density by factors of 10^1–10^7, leading the author to claim that neutrino cooling generates a dense random vortex tangle, i.e., quantum turbulence, in the neutron-star interior.

Significance. If the result holds, it identifies a generic, non-equilibrium source of vorticity in neutron superfluids that is far denser than the rotational Feynman-Onsager array, with potential implications for pulsar timing noise, vortex pinning, and thermal evolution. The analytic derivation from the pair propagator is self-contained and follows the standard KZ scaling logic; the paper also honestly discloses that the prefactor f is not universal. The main risk is the transferability of the scalar U(1) KZ derivation to the five-component spin-2 3P2 condensate, which is the regime used for the largest predicted densities. This issue is real but fixable by additional analysis or by tempering the quantitative claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.A, Eqs. (20)–(25)] The vortex density is derived from a complex scalar phase field ϑ, with the topological constraint in Eq. (24) being the U(1) phase winding. The 3P2 condensate in Figs. 3–4, however, is a five-component spin-2 tensor order parameter. The paper does not demonstrate that the phase-winding sector has the same homotopy and dynamics as a scalar U(1) condensate, nor that the scalar-field prefactor f transfers. Since the text itself states that f is system-specific, this is a load-bearing assumption rather than a cosmetic issue. Please justify the scalar reduction (e.g., by identifying the common U(1) phase embedded in the tensor state), provide a 3P2-specific defect-density estimate, or explicitly state the conclusions as conditional on this transferability.
  2. [Eq. (25) and Figs. 3–4] The reported ratios n_KZ/n_FO are linear in f, with f varied over 10^-3–10^-1. The cited simulations (Ref. 35) report f in the wider range 10^-4–1, and nothing in the manuscript rules out smaller effective values in a multicomponent condensate. For f=10^-4 the predicted density advantage is already reduced by an order of magnitude relative to the lowest displayed curve; if the tensor dynamics suppress f further, the central 'quantum turbulence' claim could fail. The abstract's 'large density ... in all cases studied' is therefore too strong. Please display the f=10^-4 and 10^-5 curves, or derive a lower bound for f in the 3P2 case.
  3. [§I and §IV] The manuscript states that the resulting vortex tangle 'persists and evolves over long timescales' and that it satisfies the basic definition of quantum turbulence. No estimate is given for the coarsening or decay timescales—vortex reconnection, Kelvin-wave cascade, and mutual friction with the normal fluid—nor is the KZ-generated tangle distinguished dynamically from turbulence in the forced Gross-Pitaevskii sense. Since the astrophysical relevance (pulsar timing noise, thermal evolution) depends on the vortex population at observable times, the paper should either add a persistence estimate or explicitly limit the claim to the generation stage.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§I.A] The numerical values for the modified Urca rate should be checked. Using the stated input parameters and Eq. (3), the cooling time at T=10^9 K and n=n0 is not obviously 412 days; please specify the density n used in the quoted value and verify the constants in Eq. (A3).
  2. [§I.C] The text defines T(t)=T_c - t/τ_Q, while Eq. (2) implies exponential cooling, T(t)=T_c exp(-t/τ_Urca). The linearization near T_c should be made explicit, with τ_Q defined as |T_c/(dT/dt)| at T_c.
  3. [§III.A] The notation 'f ∈ {1.0,0.0001}' in the discussion of Ref. 35 is non-standard; use an interval. Also, specify the dimensions and models of the simulations from which these values are taken.
  4. [Fig. 1] The gap curves are digitized from external papers; please provide the gap data as a table or supplementary file so that Figs. 3–4 are reproducible.
  5. [§II] The phrase 'spin-triplet, p-wave Cooper pair fluctuations has the same structure, but includes a 3×3 multiplicity of modes' is imprecise for 3P2 pairing; the J=2, S=1 order parameter is a five-component complex tensor. Rephrase to avoid a misleading count.
  6. [Throughout] Typos: 'aeral' should be 'areal' in Figs. 3–4 and text; 'Nouvo' → 'Nuovo', 'abrigded' → 'abridged', 'condenstate' → 'condensate', 'Arial' etc.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the predicted vortex density is computed from independent cooling rates, gap models, and an external prefactor; no equation reduces to its input by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central prediction, Eq. (25), is a scaling relation built from the quench rate (Eqs. 2–3), microscopic correlation length and time (Eq. 15), the KZ freeze-out condition (Eq. 22), and the defect-production prefactor f from external simulations (Ref. 35). The prefactor f is treated explicitly as non-universal and is varied over a range; it is not fitted to the predicted vortex density nor determined by the result it produces. None of the derived quantities—tau_Q, xi_0, tau_0, xi_hat, or n_v^KZ—is defined in terms of the final vortex density, so there is no self-definitional reduction. The only self-citation (Ref. 32, Lin & Sauls) supports the standard claim that triplet p-wave pairing fluctuations have a propagator structure similar to the scalar singlet case, with a 3x3 multiplicity. This is a technical supporting statement, not a uniqueness theorem, and it does not itself supply the numerical vortex densities, which instead follow from externally referenced cooling rates and gap models. The transferability of scalar-field KZ exponents and prefactor values to the multicomponent 3P2 condensate is a genuine physical assumption and a correctness risk, but it is not circularity: the paper does not assume the large vortex density it claims to predict. The comparison to the Crab pulsar's Feynman-Onsager vortex density is an external benchmark, not an input used to tune the calculation. Overall, the derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense and no load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central result rests on a standard KZM scaling law plus microphysical inputs from prior literature. The only genuinely free parameter introduced by this paper is f; all other assumptions are standard domain or literature inputs. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • f = not determined; plotted for 10^-3 to 10^-1 (text cites 10^-4 to 1 from simulations)
    Appears multiplicatively in Eq. (25) as the fraction of causal patches that trap a phase vortex at freeze-out. It is nonuniversal, system-specific, and controls the absolute vortex density and hence the central quantitative claim.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Kibble-Zurek freeze-out criterion RB(t̂)=2ξ(T(t̂)) with mean-field exponents ν=1/2, z=2
    Used to define freeze-out time and length (Eq. 22); not derived from microscopic neutron-matter dynamics. If critical dynamics differ (e.g., z≠2), the scaling and density change.
  • domain assumption Cooper-pair fluctuation propagator is weak-coupling BCS, Eq. (17), with exponential growth below Tc, Eq. (16)
    Underpins the patch-growth formula RB(t) and the freeze-out argument; assumes overdamped relaxational dynamics and neglects coupling to other collective modes.
  • ad hoc to paper The order parameter is treated as a scalar complex field whose phase winding produces U(1) vortices, Eq. (24) and Eq. (25), even though 3P2 pairing is a multicomponent tensor field
    The paper notes triplet pairing has a 3×3 mode multiplicity but does not model multicomponent defect structure; f is borrowed from scalar-field simulations.
  • domain assumption Cooling below Tc is approximated by normal-state Urca/modified-Urca rates evaluated at Tc, with T(t)=Tc−t/τQ; gap feedback on neutrino emission during freeze-out is neglected
    Quench timescale τQ in Eqs. (2)-(3) is evaluated at Tc. If the opening gap suppresses neutrino luminosity during the freeze-out window, the effective quench differs; freeze-out is very short, so likely minor but unquantified.
  • domain assumption Nuclear pairing gaps and transition temperatures from Refs. 22-24 (digitized in Fig. 1) are accurate at core densities up to kfn≈3.5 fm^-1
    Tc sets the argument of τQ. The paper notes high-density gaps are uncertain but demonstrates sensitivity with different potentials.
  • domain assumption Quasiparticle scattering maintains local equilibrium above Tc, so a single bath temperature T(t) describes the neutron liquid
    Uses τnn << τQ (Section II) to justify local equilibrium; needed for the assumption of a spatially homogeneous cooling ramp T(t).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generation of Quantum Turbulence by Neutrino Cooling in Neutron Stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FUKDS6DO

@misc{pith2026260522768,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generation of Quantum Turbulence by Neutrino Cooling in Neutron Stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FUKDS6DO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.22768}
}
abstract

The interior crust and much of the liquid core of neutron stars is believed to be a quantum liquid mixture of neutron and proton superfluids and a relativistic electron liquid. Quantized vortices in the neutron superfluid and quantized flux lines in the proton superconductor are topological defects of these hadronic condensates. I consider the formation of the superfluid state in young neutron stars under non-equilibrium conditions imposed by the neutrino cooling rate. The nonequilibrium phase transition implies that the onset of superfluidity is accompanied by the generation of quantized vortices based on the mechanism envisioned by Kibble in the context cosmic string formation in an evolutionary models of an expanding universe, and further developed by Zurek for nonequilibrium phase transitions in quantum liquids such as $^4$He. I discuss the Kibble-Zurek mechanism (KZM) and scaling relations for topological defect formation starting from the Cooper pair fluctuation propagator for temperatures approaching $T_c$. I then calculate the predicted vortex densities based on Urca and modified Urca cooling mechanisms in the cores of neutron stars for several models of the superfluid gap and transition temperature of the interior neutron superfluid. In all cases studied the KZM leads to a large density of topological defects in the condensate phase, which in 3D form a random network of vortex lines and loops, i.e. the generation of quantum turbulence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22768 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Neutron superfluid Gaps vs neutron Fermi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Cooper Pair Propagator. Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The aeral density of vortices generated by the KZM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Same caption as that in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Review history (3 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Excitation of Collective Modes in a Chiral Superfluid by Thermal Quench

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.5 of 10

    Thermal quenches into chiral superfluid ³He-A excite Higgs and clapping modes whose PSD and Kibble-Zurek exponents depend on Langevin damping, with z crossing smoothly from 1 to 2 while ν stays near 1/2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    sec-vortex_density-rotation

    note This scale is set by the Feynman-Onsager relation for the mean areal density of vortices as discussed in App. sec-vortex_density-rotation . Stop

  2. [2]

    author author T. W. B. \ Kibble ,\ Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings title Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings ,\ 10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General \ volume 9 ,\ pages 1387 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029 1976

  3. [3]

    author author T. W. B. \ Kibble ,\ Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition title Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition ,\ 10.1016/0370-1573(80)90091-5 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 67 ,\ pages 183 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(80)90091-5 1980

  4. [4]

    Vilenkin \ and\ author E

    author author A. Vilenkin \ and\ author E. P. S. \ Shellard ,\ @noop title Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ address Cambridge, UK ,\ year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994

  5. [5]

    author author M. B. \ Hindmarsh \ and\ author T. W. B. \ Kibble ,\ Cosmic Strings title Cosmic Strings ,\ 10.1088/0034-4885/58/5/001 journal journal Rep. Prog. Phys. \ volume 58 ,\ pages 477 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/58/5/001 1995

  6. [6]

    author author W. H. \ Zurek ,\ Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium? title Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium? \ 10.1038/382296a0 journal journal Nature \ volume 317 ,\ pages 505 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/382296a0 1985

  7. [7]

    author author W. H. \ Zurek ,\ Cosmological Experiments in Condensed Matter Systems title Cosmological Experiments in Condensed Matter Systems ,\ 10.1016/S0370-1573(96)00009-9 journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 276 ,\ pages 177 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(96)00009-9 1996

  8. [8]

    Boguta ,\ Remarks on the beta stability in neutron stars title Remarks on the beta stability in neutron stars ,\ 10.1016/0370-2693(81)90529-3 journal journal Phys

    author author J. Boguta ,\ Remarks on the beta stability in neutron stars title Remarks on the beta stability in neutron stars ,\ 10.1016/0370-2693(81)90529-3 journal journal Phys. Lett. B \ volume 106 ,\ pages 255 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90529-3 1981

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    author author J. M. \ Lattimer , author C. J. \ Pethick , author M. Prakash , \ and\ author P. Haensel ,\ Direct URCA process in neutron stars title Direct URCA process in neutron stars ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2701 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 66 ,\ pages 2701 (...

    1991 doi

  2. [10]

    Maxwell , author G

    author author O. Maxwell , author G. E. \ Brown , author D. K. \ Campbell , author R. F. \ Dashen , \ and\ author J. T. \ Manassah ,\ Beta decay of pion condensates as a cooling mechanism for neutron stars title Beta decay of pion condensates as a cooling mechanism for neutron...

    1977 doi

  3. [11]

    author author D. G. \ Yakovlev , author K. P. \ Levenfish , \ and\ author Y. A. \ Shibanov ,\ Cooling of Neutron Stars and Superfluidity in their Cores title Cooling of Neutron Stars and Superfluidity in their Cores ,\ 10.1070/PU1999v042n08ABEH000556 journal journal Physics-Us...

    1999 doi

  4. [12]

    Prakash , author M

    author author M. Prakash , author M. Prakash , author J. M. \ Lattimer , \ and\ author C. J. \ Pethick ,\ Rapid Cooling of Neutron Stars by Hyperons and Delta Isobars title Rapid Cooling of Neutron Stars by Hyperons and Delta Isobars ,\ 10.1086/186376 journal journal Astrophys...

    1992 doi

  5. [13]

    author author C. J. \ Pethick ,\ Cooling of neutron stars title Cooling of neutron stars ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.64.1133 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 64 ,\ pages 1133 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992 doi

  6. [14]

    Prakash , author T

    author author M. Prakash , author T. L. \ Ainsworth , \ and\ author J. M. \ Lattimer ,\ Equation of State and the Maximum Mass of Neutron Stars title Equation of State and the Maximum Mass of Neutron Stars ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2518 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volum...

    1988 doi

  7. [15]

    Baldo \ and\ author H.-J

    author author M. Baldo \ and\ author H.-J. \ Schulze ,\ Proton pairing in neutron stars title Proton pairing in neutron stars ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevC.75.025802 journal journal Phys. Rev. C \ volume 75 ,\ pages 025802 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  8. [16]

    author author A. B. \ Migdal ,\ Phase Transition in Nuclear Matter and Non-Pair Nuclear Forces title Phase Transition in Nuclear Matter and Non-Pair Nuclear Forces ,\ https://jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/e/index/e/36/6/p1052?a=list journal journal Sov Phys JETP \ volume 36 ,\ pages 105...

    1973

  9. [17]

    Barshay , author G

    author author S. Barshay , author G. Vagradov , \ and\ author G. E. \ Brown ,\ Possibility of a phase transition to a pion condensate in neutron stars title Possibility of a phase transition to a pion condensate in neutron stars ,\ 10.1016/0370-2693(73)90370-5 journal journal ...

    1973 doi

  10. [18]

    Baym ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Quantum Statistics and the Many Body Problem ,\ editor edited by\ editor S

    author author G. Baym ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Quantum Statistics and the Many Body Problem ,\ editor edited by\ editor S. Trickey , editor W. Kirk , \ and\ editor J. Dufty \ ( publisher Plenum, New York ,\ year 1975 )\ p.\ pages 221 NoStop

    1975

  11. [19]

    Weise \ and\ author G

    author author W. Weise \ and\ author G. E. \ Brown ,\ Equation of state for neutron matter in the presence of a pion condensate title Equation of state for neutron matter in the presence of a pion condensate ,\ 10.1016/0370-2693(75)90658-9 journal journal Phys. Lett. B \ volum...

    1975 doi

  12. [20]

    author author J. N. \ Bahcall \ and\ author R. A. \ Wolf ,\ Neutron Stars II: Neutrino-Cooling and Observability title Neutron Stars II: Neutrino-Cooling and Observability ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.140.B1452 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 140 ,\ pages B1452 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    1965 doi

  13. [21]

    Yakovlev \ and\ author C

    author author D. Yakovlev \ and\ author C. Pethick ,\ Neutron Star Cooling title Neutron Star Cooling ,\ 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134013 journal journal Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics \ volume 42 ,\ pages 169 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004

  14. [22]

    Hebeler , author A

    author author K. Hebeler , author A. Schwenk , \ and\ author B. Friman ,\ Dependence of the BCS ^1 S _0 superfluid pairing gap on nuclear interactions title Dependence of the BCS ^1 S _0 superfluid pairing gap on nuclear interactions ,\ 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.03.022 journal j...

    2007 doi

  15. [23]

    Schwenk , author B

    author author A. Schwenk , author B. Friman , \ and\ author G. Brown ,\ Renormalization group approach to neutron matter: Quasiparticle interactions, superfluid gaps and the equation of state title Renormalization group approach to neutron matter: Quasiparticle interactions, s...

    2003 doi

  16. [24]

    Baldo , author

    author author M. Baldo , author . Elgarøy , author L. Engvik , author M. Hjorth-Jensen , \ and\ author H.-J. \ Schulze ,\ ^3P_2 - ^3F_2 pairing in neutron matter with modern nucleon-nucleon potentials title ^3P_2 - ^3F_2 pairing in neutron matter with modern nucleon-nucleon po...

    1921 doi

  17. [25]

    Page , author J

    author author D. Page , author J. M. \ Lattimer , author M. Prakash , \ and\ author A. W. \ Steiner ,\ Neutrino Emission From Cooper Pairs and Minimal Cooling of Neutron Stars title Neutrino Emission From Cooper Pairs and Minimal Cooling of Neutron Stars ,\ 10.1088/0004-637X/7...

    2009 doi

  18. [26]

    author author A. B. \ Migdal ,\ Superfluidity and the Moments of Inertia of Nuclei title Superfluidity and the Moments of Inertia of Nuclei ,\ @noop journal journal Sov. Phys. JETP \ volume 10 ,\ pages 176 ( year 1960 ) ,\ note Zh. Eskp. Teor. Fiz. 37 , 1, 249 (1969) NoStop

    1960

  19. [27]

    author author V. L. \ Ginzburg \ and\ author D. A. \ Kirzhnits ,\ On Superfluidity of Neutron Stars title On Superfluidity of Neutron Stars ,\ @noop journal journal Sov. Phys. JETP \ volume 20 ,\ pages 1346 ( year 1965 ) ,\ note translated from: Zh. Eskp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 2006 (...

    1965

  20. [28]

    Hoffberg , author A

    author author M. Hoffberg , author A. E. \ Glassgold , author R. W. \ Richardson , \ and\ author M. Ruderman ,\ Anisotropic Superfluidity in Neutron Star Matter title Anisotropic Superfluidity in Neutron Star Matter ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.24.775 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett...

    1970 doi

  21. [29]

    Tamagaki ,\ Superfluid state in neutron star matter

    author author R. Tamagaki ,\ Superfluid state in neutron star matter. I. Generalized Bogoliubov transformation and existence of ^3 P _2 gap at high density title Superfluid state in neutron star matter. I. Generalized Bogoliubov transformation and existence of ^3 P _2 gap at h...

    1970 doi

  22. [30]

    The factors of (-1) and 5 6 1 5 6 2 come from the Feynman rules for vertices and equivalent Fermion lines, respectively

    note Here I set k_ 5 6 B = =1 and restore normal dimensions when needed. The factors of (-1) and 5 6 1 5 6 2 come from the Feynman rules for vertices and equivalent Fermion lines, respectively. Stop

  23. [31]

    Babu \ and\ author G

    author author S. Babu \ and\ author G. E. \ Brown ,\ Quasiparticle interaction in liquid title Quasiparticle interaction in liquid ,\ 10.1016/0003-4916(73)90002-X journal journal Annals of Physics \ volume 78 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1973 ) NoStop

    1973 doi

  24. [32]

    \ Lin \ and\ author J

    author author W.-T. \ Lin \ and\ author J. A. \ Sauls ,\ Effects of Incipient Pairing on Non-equilibrium Quasiparticle Transport in Fermi Liquids title Effects of Incipient Pairing on Non-equilibrium Quasiparticle Transport in Fermi Liquids ,\ 10.1093/ptep/ptep027 \ volume 202...

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    Abrikosov , author L

    author author A. Abrikosov , author L. Gorkov , \ and\ author I. Dzyaloshinski ,\ @noop title Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics ,\ edition 2nd \ ed.\ ( publisher Pergamon ,\ address Oxford ,\ year 1965 ) NoStop

    1965

  26. [34]

    note The Riemann zeta function (3) 1.20205 [ @citealpnum abramowitz84 ] NoStop

  27. [35]

    author author W. H. \ Zurek , author L. M. A. \ Bettencourt , author J. Dziarmaga , \ and\ author N. D. \ Antunes ,\ title Shards of Broken Symmetry: Topological Defects as Traces of the Phase Transition Dynamics ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Topological Defects and the Non-equilibri...

    2000

  28. [36]

    author author K. S. \ C. F. Barenghi , L. Skrbek ,\ @noop title Quantum Turbulence \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ address Cambridge, UK ,\ year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  29. [37]

    Tsutsumi , author T

    author author Y. Tsutsumi , author T. Kawakami , author T. Mizushima , author M. Ichioka , \ and\ author K. Machida ,\ Majorana bound state in rotating superfluid ^3 He-A between parallel plates title Majorana bound state in rotating superfluid ^3 He-A between parallel plates ...

    2008

  30. [38]

    Onsager ,\ Statistical Hydrodynamics title Statistical Hydrodynamics ,\ 10.1007/BF02780991 journal journal Il Nouvo Cimento \ volume 6 ,\ pages 279 ( year 1949 ) NoStop

    author author L. Onsager ,\ Statistical Hydrodynamics title Statistical Hydrodynamics ,\ 10.1007/BF02780991 journal journal Il Nouvo Cimento \ volume 6 ,\ pages 279 ( year 1949 ) NoStop

    1949 doi

  31. [39]

    author author R. P. \ Feynman ,\ title Chapter 2: The Application of Quantum Mechanics to Liquid Helium ,\ in\ 10.1016/S0079-6417(08)60077-3 booktitle Progress in Low Temperature Physics ,\ Vol. volume I ,\ editor edited by\ editor C. J. \ Gorter \ ( publisher North Holland Pu...

    1955 doi

  32. [40]

    Abramowitz \ and\ author I

    author author M. Abramowitz \ and\ author I. Stegun ,\ @noop title Pocketbook of Mathematical Functions ,\ edition abrigded \ ed.\ ( publisher Verlag Harry Deutsch ,\ year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.