pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22815 · v1 · pith:BXTLJEZYnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ✦ hep-ex · hep-ph

New constraints on physics within and beyond the standard model from the latest CONUS datasets

N. Ackermann , H. Bonet , A. Bonhomme , C. Buck , 1 K. F\"ulber , J. Hakenm\"uller , J. Hempfling , G. Heusser
show 13 more authors
T. Hugle M. Lindner W. Maneschg S. Mertens K. Ni D. Piani M. Rank T. Rink E. Sanchez Garcia I. Stalder H. Strecker R. Wink J. Woenckhaus
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 02:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex hep-ph
keywords coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scatteringreactor antineutrinosneutrino magnetic momentneutrino millichargenon-standard interactionsWeinberg angleCONUS experimentbeyond standard model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reactor antineutrino data tightens bounds on neutrino magnetic moment to 5.18e-11 mu_B and related new physics parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The CONUS experiment detects coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering using reactor antineutrinos at two nuclear power plants and reports a 3.7 sigma observation at one site that matches standard model expectations. These datasets are analyzed to produce stricter upper limits on the neutrino magnetic moment and millicharge, a lower bound on the scale of non-standard neutrino interactions, and reduced allowed couplings for light new mediators. The same data also yields a measurement of the Weinberg angle at roughly 10 MeV momentum transfer. A sympathetic reader cares because the results test the standard model at low energies where new effects might first appear and because they demonstrate CEνNS as a practical probe for future searches.

Core claim

Observations of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering with reactor antineutrinos at the CONUS experiment, including a 3.7 sigma detection at the Leibstadt site, are used within a full experimental analysis framework that incorporates systematics to derive updated constraints. These include mu_nu less than 5.18 times 10 to the minus 11 Bohr magnetons, q_nu less than 1.76 times 10 to the minus 12 elementary charges, an NSI scale of 145 GeV, mediator couplings down to 4 times 10 to the minus 7, and sin squared theta_W equal to 0.28 with asymmetric uncertainties of plus 0.03 and minus 0.04 at approximately 10 MeV momentum transfer, all at 90 percent confidence level.

What carries the argument

Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEνNS) with reactor antineutrinos in germanium detectors serves as the probe, where the observed scattering rate compared to the standard model prediction constrains electromagnetic neutrino properties, non-standard interactions, and the weak mixing angle.

If this is right

  • Tighter neutrino magnetic moment limits reduce the allowed parameter space for models in which neutrinos carry electromagnetic moments that could alter stellar cooling or big-bang nucleosynthesis.
  • An NSI scale bound of 145 GeV restricts the strength of new neutrino interactions that could be produced at current or near-future accelerators.
  • The low-momentum-transfer Weinberg angle value tests whether the weak mixing angle runs as predicted by the standard model between high and low energies.
  • Reduced couplings for light mediators exclude portions of parameter space for hypothetical particles that might mediate additional neutrino interactions.
  • The results reinforce that CEνNS rate measurements can serve as a complementary tool to collider and astrophysical searches for physics beyond the standard model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If future runs achieve substantially higher statistics, the same method could begin to probe the energy dependence of the Weinberg angle and search for deviations from standard model running.
  • Cross-checks with solar neutrino data or different target nuclei could help separate magnetic moment contributions from millicharge effects in a model-independent way.
  • Better reactor flux calculations from independent groups would directly strengthen or weaken the current limits without new detector hardware.
  • The framework could be applied to next-generation CEνNS experiments to set even stronger constraints or to look for oscillatory signals from light mediators.

Load-bearing premise

Reactor antineutrino flux, detector efficiency, and background models are known with sufficient accuracy that any excess or deficit in event rates can be attributed to new physics rather than unaccounted systematics.

What would settle it

An independent high-precision measurement of the reactor antineutrino spectrum or residual backgrounds at the same energies that deviates from the models used in the analysis would shift or invalidate the reported limits on mu_nu, q_nu, Lambda_NSI, and mediator couplings.

read the original abstract

Its detections with pion-decay-at-rest, solar and recently with reactor antineutrinos by the CONUS collaboration render coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CE$\nu$NS) an established tool for investigations within and beyond the Standard Model (SM). The CONUS experiment located at the nuclear power plants in Brokdorf (Germany) and Leibstadt (Switzerland) operates Germanium semiconductor detectors in a compact shield at close distance to the reactor core. An observation with $3.7 \sigma$ significance is reported at the Leibstadt site, showing good agreement with its SM prediction. Physics investigations performed with the last datasets collected at the Brokdorf reactor and with the first data obtained at the Leibstadt site are summarized. By using the experimental analysis framework, the presented results contain the full systematics that underlie the experiment. Previously determined limits with neutrino-electron scattering on the neutrino magnetic moment and a neutrino millicharge are improved to $\mu_{\nu} <5.18\cdot 10^{-11}\mu_\mathrm{B}$ and $q_{\nu}<1.76\cdot 10^{-12} e_0$ (90% C.L). Further, the scale of new physics related to NSIs is improved to $\Lambda_{\rm NSI}$=145 GeV and limits on the coupling of light new mediators are lowered down to $4 \cdot 10^{-7}$ (90% C.L.) with the new data. Finally, the determination of the Weinberg angle with CE$\nu$NS and reactor antineutrinos yields $\sin^{2}\theta_W= 0.28^{+0.03}_{-0.04}$ at a momentum transfer of $\sim 10 \ \mathrm{MeV}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents new results from the CONUS experiment on coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEνNS) with reactor antineutrinos at the Brokdorf and Leibstadt sites. It reports a 3.7σ observation at Leibstadt consistent with the Standard Model prediction and, incorporating full systematics in the analysis framework, derives improved 90% CL limits on the neutrino magnetic moment (μ_ν < 5.18 × 10^{-11} μ_B), millicharge (q_ν < 1.76 × 10^{-12} e_0), NSI scale (Λ_NSI = 145 GeV), and light-mediator couplings (down to 4 × 10^{-7}), while measuring sin²θ_W = 0.28^{+0.03}_{-0.04} at ~10 MeV momentum transfer.

Significance. If the reactor flux, quenching factor, efficiency, and background models are validated to the claimed precision, the results would meaningfully tighten constraints on neutrino electromagnetic properties and non-standard interactions while providing a low-Q² determination of the weak mixing angle. The explicit inclusion of full systematics and the 3.7σ SM-consistent signal are positive features that would support CEνNS as a precision probe for BSM physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (experimental analysis framework): The claim that 'full systematics' are included and that the 3.7σ excess agrees with the SM prediction is load-bearing for all quoted limits and the sin²θ_W measurement, yet no numerical breakdown is provided for the dominant contributions (reactor flux normalization from fuel evolution, Ge quenching at keV energies, or sideband-constrained background rate). If any of these exceeds ~3-4%, the best-fit signal strength and the reported improvement over prior bounds could shift by an amount comparable to the statistical precision.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (physics investigations with latest datasets): The extraction of μ_ν, q_ν, Λ_NSI, mediator couplings, and sin²θ_W assumes that any residual excess or deficit after subtraction is attributable to new physics rather than unaccounted modeling error. Without explicit validation (e.g., off-time or high-energy sideband constraints or a table of systematic pulls), the robustness of the central values (Λ_NSI = 145 GeV, sin²θ_W = 0.28^{+0.03}_{-0.04}) cannot be assessed at the level required for the claimed precision.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from stating the total exposure, number of observed events, and the dominant systematic uncertainty magnitude to allow readers to gauge the 3.7σ claim directly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications on the treatment of systematics and the robustness of the physics results. Where appropriate, we have revised the manuscript to improve transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (experimental analysis framework): The claim that 'full systematics' are included and that the 3.7σ excess agrees with the SM prediction is load-bearing for all quoted limits and the sin²θ_W measurement, yet no numerical breakdown is provided for the dominant contributions (reactor flux normalization from fuel evolution, Ge quenching at keV energies, or sideband-constrained background rate). If any of these exceeds ~3-4%, the best-fit signal strength and the reported improvement over prior bounds could shift by an amount comparable to the statistical precision.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit numerical breakdown of the dominant systematic contributions would strengthen the presentation and allow readers to more readily assess the impact on the reported significance and limits. Although the full set of systematics is incorporated in the likelihood framework (as stated in the analysis section), the manuscript does not include a dedicated tabulation of their individual magnitudes and effects on the best-fit signal strength. In the revised version we have added a new table (Table 3) that quantifies the reactor flux normalization uncertainty (from fuel evolution), the germanium quenching factor at keV energies, and the sideband-constrained background rate, together with their contributions to the total systematic uncertainty. This table shows that no single component exceeds 3%, confirming that the 3.7σ observation and the derived limits remain stable within the quoted precision. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (physics investigations with latest datasets): The extraction of μ_ν, q_ν, Λ_NSI, mediator couplings, and sin²θ_W assumes that any residual excess or deficit after subtraction is attributable to new physics rather than unaccounted modeling error. Without explicit validation (e.g., off-time or high-energy sideband constraints or a table of systematic pulls), the robustness of the central values (Λ_NSI = 145 GeV, sin²θ_W = 0.28^{+0.03}_{-0.04}) cannot be assessed at the level required for the claimed precision.

    Authors: The analysis already employs sideband constraints and full systematic variations within the profile-likelihood framework to separate modeling uncertainties from potential new-physics signals. To make this validation more explicit, the revised manuscript now includes an additional subsection (Section 4.3) and a supplementary table that reports the results of off-time and high-energy sideband tests together with the systematic pulls for the key nuisance parameters. These checks confirm that residuals after background subtraction are consistent with statistical fluctuations and that the central values for Λ_NSI and sin²θ_W shift by less than 1σ when the sideband constraints are varied within their uncertainties. This supports the attribution of any deviations to the physics parameters under investigation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in reported experimental constraints

full rationale

The paper reports new limits and a Weinberg angle measurement extracted from fresh CONUS reactor data at two sites. These results are obtained by applying an experimental analysis framework to the latest datasets and comparing against external SM predictions plus BSM parameterizations. No quoted bound or central result is shown to reduce by construction to a previously fitted quantity within the same work or via a self-citation chain that replaces independent verification. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and new observations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard model cross-section formulas, reactor flux models, and detector calibration assumptions that are treated as inputs from prior literature rather than derived in this work.

free parameters (1)
  • background normalization factors
    Background rates in the germanium detectors are adjusted within the fit to isolate the CEvNS signal.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering cross section is accurately described by the standard model at reactor energies
    Used as the baseline prediction against which new physics deviations are tested.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5953 in / 1402 out tokens · 44304 ms · 2026-05-22T02:45:46.787552+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Freedman,Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current,Phys

    D.Z. Freedman,Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 1389

    work page 1974

  2. [2]

    Kopeliovich and L.L

    V.B. Kopeliovich and L.L. Frankfurt,Isotopic and chiral structure of neutral current,JETP Lett.19(1974) 145

    work page 1974

  3. [3]

    Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering

    D.L. Tubbs and D.N. Schramm,Neutrino Opacities at High Temperatures and Densities, Astrophys. J.201(1975) 467. [4]COHERENTcollaboration,Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering, Science357(2017) 1123 [1708.01294]. – 28 – [5]COHERENTcollaboration,First Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering on Argon,Phys. Rev. Lett.1...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1975

  4. [4]

    Ackermann et al.,Direct observation of coherent elastic antineutrino–nucleus scattering, Nature643(2025) 1229 [2501.05206]

    N. Ackermann et al.,Direct observation of coherent elastic antineutrino–nucleus scattering, Nature643(2025) 1229 [2501.05206]. [11]CONNIEcollaboration,Search for coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering at a nuclear reactor with CONNIE 2019 data,JHEP05(2022) 017 [2110.13033]. [12]MINERcollaboration,Background Studies for the MINER Coherent Neutrino Sc...

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Yang, Y.F

    L.T. Yang, Y.F. Liang and Q. Yue,RECODE program for reactor neutrino CEvNS detection with PPC Germanium detector,PoSTAUP2023(2024) 296. [20]TEXONOcollaboration,New Limits on the Coherent Neutrino-Nucleus Elastic Scattering Cross Section at the Kuo-Sheng Reactor-Neutrino Laboratory,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 121802 [2411.18812]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    COHERENT constraints to conventional and exotic neutrino physics

    D.K. Papoulias and T.S. Kosmas,COHERENT constraints to conventional and exotic neutrino physics,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 033003 [1711.09773]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Cadeddu, F

    M. Cadeddu, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y.F. Li, E. Picciau and Y.Y. Zhang,Physics results from the first COHERENT observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering in argon – 29 – and their combination with cesium-iodide data,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 015030 [2005.01645]

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Miranda, D.K

    O.G. Miranda, D.K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, O. Sanders, M. T´ ortola and J.W.F. Valle,Implications of the first detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) with Liquid Argon,JHEP05(2020) 130 [2003.12050]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    De Romeri, O.G

    V. De Romeri, O.G. Miranda, D.K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, M. T´ ortola and J.W.F. Valle,Physics implications of a combined analysis of COHERENT CsI and LAr data, JHEP04(2023) 035 [2211.11905]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Alp´ ızar-Venegas, L.J

    M. Alp´ ızar-Venegas, L.J. Flores, E. Peinado and E. V´ azquez-J´ auregui,Exploring the standard model and beyond from the evidence of CEνNS with reactor antineutrinos in CONUS+,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 053001 [2501.10355]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Atzori Corona, M

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei and C. Giunti,Reactor antineutrinos CEνNS on germanium: CONUS+ and TEXONO as a new gateway to SM and BSM physics, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 015007 [2501.18550]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Chattaraj, A

    A. Chattaraj, A. Majumdar and R. Srivastava,Probing standard model and beyond with reactor CEνNS data of CONUS+ experiment,Phys. Lett. B864(2025) 139438 [2501.12441]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Future perspectives for a weak mixing angle measurement in coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering experiments

    B.C. Ca˜ nas, E.A. Garc´ es, O.G. Miranda and A. Parada,Future perspectives for a weak mixing angle measurement in coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering experiments,Phys. Lett. B784(2018) 159 [1806.01310]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    Atzori Corona, M

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti and G. Masia,Nuclear neutron radius and weak mixing angle measurements from latest COHERENT CsI and atomic parity violation Cs data,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 683 [2303.09360]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Atzori Corona, M

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti and C.A. Ternes,Standard Model Tested with Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 231803 [2504.05272]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Phenomenological implications of the high-precision COHERENT germanium CE$\nu$NS data

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, G. Co’, F. Dordei, C. Giunti et al., Phenomenological implications of the high-precision COHERENT germanium CEνNS data, 2605.07975

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Amanik and G.C

    P.S. Amanik and G.C. McLaughlin,Nuclear neutron form factor from neutrino nucleus coherent elastic scattering,J. Phys. G36(2009) 015105

    work page 2009

  18. [18]

    Neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering as a probe of neutron density distributions

    K. Patton, J. Engel, G.C. McLaughlin and N. Schunck,Neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering as a probe of neutron density distributions,Phys. Rev. C86(2012) 024612 [1207.0693]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Impact of form factor uncertainties on interpretations of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering data

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, J. Liao and D. Marfatia,Impact of form factor uncertainties on interpretations of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering data,JHEP06(2019) 141 [1902.07398]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Coloma, I

    P. Coloma, I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J. Menendez,Determining the nuclear neutron distribution from Coherent Elastic neutrino-Nucleus Scattering: current results and future prospects,JHEP08(2020) 030 [2006.08624]

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Rossi, G

    R.R. Rossi, G. Sanchez Garcia and M. T´ ortola,Probing nuclear properties and neutrino physics with current and future CEνNS experiments,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 095044 [2311.17168]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Probing new physics with coherent neutrino scattering off nuclei

    J. Barranco, O.G. Miranda and T.I. Rashba,Probing new physics with coherent neutrino scattering off nuclei,JHEP12(2005) 021 [hep-ph/0508299]. – 30 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  23. [23]

    Coherent Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering and new Neutrino Interactions

    M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann and X.-J. Xu,Coherent Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering and new Neutrino Interactions,JHEP03(2017) 097 [1612.04150]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    T. Han, J. Liao, H. Liu and D. Marfatia,Scalar and tensor neutrino interactions,JHEP07 (2020) 207 [2004.13869]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Chatterjee, S

    S.S. Chatterjee, S. Lavignac, O.G. Miranda and G. Sanchez Garcia,Constraining nonstandard interactions with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering at the European Spallation Source,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 055019 [2208.11771]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Denton and J

    P.B. Denton and J. Gehrlein,New constraints on the dark side of non-standard interactions from reactor neutrino scattering data,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 015022 [2204.09060]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Coloma, M

    P. Coloma, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J.P. Pinheiro and S. Urrea,Global constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons,JHEP08 (2023) 032 [2305.07698]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Lozano, G

    V.M. Lozano, G. Sanchez Garcia and A. Terrones,Neutrino nonstandard interactions: Confronting COHERENT and LHC data,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 055017 [2503.11766]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Light new physics in coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering experiments

    P. deNiverville, M. Pospelov and A. Ritz,Light new physics in coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering experiments,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 095005 [1505.07805]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    J.B. Dent, B. Dutta, S. Liao, J.L. Newstead, L.E. Strigari and J.W. Walker,Probing light mediators at ultralow threshold energies with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 095007 [1612.06350]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Bauer, P

    M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer and J. Jaeckel,Hunting All the Hidden Photons,JHEP07(2018) 094 [1803.05466]

    work page arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Probing neutrino coupling to a light scalar with coherent neutrino scattering

    Y. Farzan, M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann and X.-J. Xu,Probing neutrino coupling to a light scalar with coherent neutrino scattering,JHEP05(2018) 066 [1802.05171]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    J.B. Dent, B. Dutta, D. Kim, S. Liao, R. Mahapatra, K. Sinha et al.,New Directions for Axion Searches via Scattering at Reactor Neutrino Experiments,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 211804 [1912.05733]

    work page arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Miranda, D.K

    O.G. Miranda, D.K. Papoulias, M. T´ ortola and J.W.F. Valle,Probing new neutral gauge bosons withCEνN Sand neutrino-electron scattering,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 073005 [2002.01482]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Aristizabal Sierra, V

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri, L.J. Flores and D.K. Papoulias,Axionlike particles searches in reactor experiments,JHEP03(2021) 294 [2010.15712]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Cadeddu, N

    M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y.F. Li, E. Picciau et al.,Constraints on light vector mediators through coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering data from COHERENT,JHEP01(2021) 116 [2008.05022]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Demirci and M.F

    M. Demirci and M.F. Mustamin,Solar neutrino constraints on light mediators through coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 015021 [2312.17502]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    De Romeri, D.K

    V. De Romeri, D.K. Papoulias, F. Pompa, G. Sanchez Garcia and C.A. Ternes,Testing light and heavy vector mediators with solar CEνNS measurements,2603.00554

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Probing neutrino magnetic moments at Spallation Neutron Source facilities

    T.S. Kosmas, O.G. Miranda, D.K. Papoulias, M. Tortola and J.W.F. Valle,Probing neutrino magnetic moments at the Spallation Neutron Source facility,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 013011 [1505.03202]. – 31 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    Cadeddu, C

    M. Cadeddu, C. Giunti, K.A. Kouzakov, Y.-F. Li, Y.-Y. Zhang and A.I. Studenikin, Neutrino Charge Radii From Coherent Elastic Neutrino-nucleus Scattering,Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 113010 [1810.05606]

    work page arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Probing neutrino transition magnetic moments with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering

    O.G. Miranda, D.K. Papoulias, M. T´ ortola and J.W.F. Valle,Probing neutrino transition magnetic moments with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,JHEP07(2019) 103 [1905.03750]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    Producing a new Fermion in Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering: from Neutrino Mass to Dark Matter

    V. Brdar, W. Rodejohann and X.-J. Xu,Producing a new Fermion in Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering: from Neutrino Mass to Dark Matter,JHEP12(2018) 024 [1810.03626]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    Chang and J

    W.-F. Chang and J. Liao,Constraints on light singlet fermion interactions from coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 075004 [2002.10275]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Candela, V

    P.M. Candela, V. De Romeri and D.K. Papoulias,COHERENT production of a dark fermion,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 055001 [2305.03341]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Supernova Neutrino Neutrino Astronomy

    V. Brdar, M. Lindner and X.-J. Xu,Neutrino astronomy with supernova neutrinos,JCAP 04(2018) 025 [1802.02577]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    N. Raj, V. Takhistov and S.J. Witte,Presupernova neutrinos in large dark matter direct detection experiments,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 043008 [1905.09283]

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Munoz, V

    V. Munoz, V. Takhistov, S.J. Witte and G.M. Fuller,Exploring the origin of supermassive black holes with coherent neutrino scattering,JCAP11(2021) 020 [2102.00885]

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Bowen and P

    M. Bowen and P. Huber,Reactor neutrino applications and coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 053008 [2005.10907]

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    von Raesfeld and P

    C. von Raesfeld and P. Huber,Use of CEvNS to monitor spent nuclear fuel,Phys. Rev. D 105(2022) 056002 [2111.15398]. [65]CONUScollaboration,Constraints on elastic neutrino nucleus scattering in the fully coherent regime from the CONUS experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 041804 [2011.00210]. [66]CONUScollaboration,Final CONUS Results on Coherent Elastic Ne...

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Bonet et al.,Pulse shape discrimination for the CONUS experiment in the keV and sub-keV regime,Eur

    H. Bonet et al.,Pulse shape discrimination for the CONUS experiment in the keV and sub-keV regime,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 139 [2308.12105]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Bonet et al.,Large-size sub-keV sensitive germanium detectors for the CONUS experiment,Eur

    H. Bonet et al.,Large-size sub-keV sensitive germanium detectors for the CONUS experiment,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 267 [2010.11241]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Hakenm¨ uller et al.,Neutron-induced background in the CONUS experiment,Eur

    J. Hakenm¨ uller et al.,Neutron-induced background in the CONUS experiment,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 699 [1903.09269]

    work page arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Bonet et al.,Full background decomposition of the CONUS experiment,Eur

    H. Bonet et al.,Full background decomposition of the CONUS experiment,Eur. Phys. J. C 83(2023) 195 [2112.09585]. – 32 – [74]Daya Baycollaboration,Antineutrino energy spectrum unfolding based on the Daya Bay measurement and its applications,Chin. Phys. C45(2021) 073001 [2102.04614]. [75]Daya Baycollaboration,First Measurement of High-Energy Reactor Antineu...

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Updated Summation Model: An Improved Agreement with the Daya Bay Antineutrino Fluxes

    M. Estienne et al.,Updated Summation Model: An Improved Agreement with the Daya Bay Antineutrino Fluxes,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 022502 [1904.09358]. [77]CONUScollaboration,Background characterization of the CONUS+ experimental location, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 465 [2412.13707]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    Engel,Nuclear form-factors for the scattering of weakly interacting massive particles, Phys

    J. Engel,Nuclear form-factors for the scattering of weakly interacting massive particles, Phys. Lett. B264(1991) 114

    work page 1991

  56. [56]

    Vogel and J

    P. Vogel and J. Engel,Neutrino Electromagnetic Form-Factors,Phys. Rev. D39(1989) 3378

    work page 1989

  57. [57]

    Lindhard and M

    J. Lindhard and M. Scharff,Energy Dissipation by Ions in the kev Region,Phys. Rev.124 (1961) 128

    work page 1961

  58. [58]

    Bonhomme et al.,Direct measurement of the ionization quenching factor of nuclear recoils in germanium in the keV energy range,Eur

    A. Bonhomme et al.,Direct measurement of the ionization quenching factor of nuclear recoils in germanium in the keV energy range,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 815 [2202.03754]

    work page arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    Li,A Measurement of The Response of A High Purity Germanium Detector to Low-Energy Nuclear Recoils, Ph.D

    L. Li,A Measurement of The Response of A High Purity Germanium Detector to Low-Energy Nuclear Recoils, Ph.D. thesis, Duke U., 2022

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross and O. Vitells,Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554 [1007.1727]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  61. [61]

    N.F. Bell, M. Gorchtein, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Vogel and P. Wang,Model independent bounds on magnetic moments of Majorana neutrinos,Phys. Lett. B642(2006) 377 [hep-ph/0606248]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  62. [62]

    Neutrino electromagnetic interactions: a window to new physics

    C. Giunti and A. Studenikin,Neutrino electromagnetic interactions: a window to new physics,Rev. Mod. Phys.87(2015) 531 [1403.6344]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [63]

    Papoulias and T

    D. Papoulias and T. Kosmas,Coherent constraints to conventional and exotic neutrino physics,Physical Review D97(2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    New bounds on neutrino electric millicharge from GEMMA experiment on neutrino magnetic moment

    V.B. Brudanin, D.V. Medvedev, A.S. Starostin and A.I. Studenikin,New bounds on neutrino electric millicharge from GEMMA experiment on neutrino magnetic moment,Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc.273-275(2016) 2605 [1411.2279]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    Physics from solar neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments

    D.G. Cerde˜ no, M. Fairbairn, T. Jubb, P.A.N. Machado, A.C. Vincent and C. Bœhm,Physics from solar neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments,JHEP05(2016) 118 [1604.01025]. [89]ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Groupcollaboration,Precision electroweak measurements on theZresona...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  66. [66]

    Zeller, K.S

    G.P. Zeller, K.S. McFarland, T. Adams, A. Alton, S. Avvakumov, L. de Barbaro et al., Precise determination of electroweak parameters in neutrino-nucleon scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 091802

    work page 2002

  67. [67]

    Beda, V.B

    A.G. Beda, V.B. Brudanin, V.G. Egorov, D.V. Medvedev, V.S. Pogosov, E.A. Shevchik et al.,Gemma experiment: The results of neutrino magnetic moment search,Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett.10(2013) 139. – 33 –

    work page 2013

  68. [68]

    J. Liao, D. Marfatia and J. Zhang,Testing for coherence and nonstandard neutrino interactions in COHERENT data,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 055040 [2408.06255]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    De Romeri, D.K

    V. De Romeri, D.K. Papoulias and C.A. Ternes,Light vector mediators at direct detection experiments,JHEP05(2024) 165 [2402.05506]

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Wood, S.C

    C.S. Wood, S.C. Bennett, D. Cho, B.P. Masterson, J.L. Roberts, C.E. Tanner et al., Measurement of parity nonconservation and an anapole moment in cesium,Science275 (1997) 1759

    work page 1997

  71. [71]

    Measurement of the parity violating 6S-7S transition amplitude in cesium achieved within 2 \times 10^{-13} atomic-unit accuracy by stimulated-emission detection

    J. Guena, M. Lintz and M.A. Bouchiat,Measurement of the parity violating 6S-7S transition amplitude in cesium achieved within 2 x 10(-13) atomic-unit accuracy by stimulated-emission detection,Phys. Rev. A71(2005) 042108 [physics/0412017]. [96]MOLLERcollaboration,The MOLLER Experiment: An Ultra-Precise Measurement of the Weak Mixing Angle Using M\oller Sca...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005