pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23366 · v1 · pith:SGESCC6Unew · submitted 2026-05-22 · 📡 eess.SP

Stochastic Geometry Analysis of Uplink CUMA-Enabled Cellular Networks

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 04:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords uplinkCUMAstochastic geometrySIR coverage probabilitycellular networksport selectionfluid antenna systeminterference aggregation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Uplink CUMA in multi-cell networks yields competitive or superior SIR coverage and rates under limited CSI by selecting ports on desired-link information alone.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses stochastic geometry to model uplink transmission in cellular networks equipped with compact ultra-massive arrays. It establishes that port selection based only on the desired user's channel state information, followed by superposition combining, produces coherent gain on the desired signal while interference from other cells remains largely non-coherent. Closed-form approximate expressions are derived for signal-to-interference ratio coverage probability, average user rate, and cell sum-rate, showing how these quantities vary with array size, port selection density, and network density. A reader would care because the scheme avoids the need for full interference channel knowledge that conventional multi-antenna methods require at scale.

Core claim

The paper derives a tight approximate expression for the SIR coverage probability of uplink CUMA-enabled multi-cell networks and characterizes the resulting average user rate and cell sum-rate. It shows that the scheme, which activates a subset of ports using only desired-link CSI and combines them by superposition, achieves performance that is competitive with and often exceeds that of conventional schemes when only practical CSI is available.

What carries the argument

The CUMA port-selection and superposition mechanism, which activates ports using only desired-link CSI to produce coherent desired-signal enhancement and largely non-coherent interference aggregation.

If this is right

  • Performance improves or degrades in quantifiable ways as the number of ports, selection ratio, and transmit power vary.
  • Average user rate and cell sum-rate exhibit specific scaling trends as base-station density increases.
  • The derived SIR coverage expression remains accurate across a range of practical network parameters, as confirmed by simulation.
  • CUMA offers a hardware-efficient uplink solution for large-scale cellular deployments where full interference CSI is unavailable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same port-selection principle could be examined for downlink transmission or for scenarios with user mobility.
  • Hardware implementations could trade fewer RF chains against more ports while preserving the non-coherent interference benefit.
  • The scaling laws derived for densification could guide dimensioning rules for future ultra-dense networks.

Load-bearing premise

Inter-cell interference aggregates largely non-coherently because of the random superposition effect from port selection.

What would settle it

A measurement campaign in a multi-cell testbed that directly compares the coherence of aggregate interference under CUMA port selection against the non-coherent aggregation predicted by the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23366 by Chan-Byoung Chae, Chenguang Rao, Hanjiang Hong, Kai-Kit Wong, Ross Murch, Xusheng Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Results for the CDF of the SIR. Λ = λ u / λ b 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 User average rate/(bits/s/Hz) 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Emprical results Analytical results η=2.7 η=2.4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Results for the average rate vs. the BS-UE density rat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: presents the cell sum rate against the FAS width W1. Similar to the case of varying N, CUMA exhibits pronounced fluctuations as W1 increases, which again stems from the os￾cillatory nature of the Bessel function in the correlation model. Compared to the variation with respect to N, the fluctuations with respect to W1 are even more significant, indicating that the aperture size has a strong impact on the ef… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the cell sum rate versus the path-loss exponent η. It is observed that the performance of all schemes improves FA width W1 (W1 =W2 ) 4 6 8 10 12 14 Cell sum rate/(bits/s/Hz) 0 5 10 15 CUMA ZF Full-CSI MMSE JAPBO η=2.7 η=2.4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Uplink cellular networks are interference-dominated but interference channel state information (CSI) is rarely available at scale. The emerging fluid antenna system (FAS) concept, which provides additional spatial degrees of freedom through multi-port reconfiguration, offers a promising alternative to CSI-intensive multi-antenna processing. Building on this concept, compact ultra-massive arrays (CUMA) exploit large-scale port selection with low implementation complexity. In each uplink transmission, CUMA activates a subset of ports based on only the desired-link CSI and combines the selected ports via simple superposition, yielding coherent enhancement of the desired user signal, while inter-cell interference aggregates largely non-coherently due to the random superposition effect. Consequently, CUMA is well suited to multi-cell uplink scenarios where CSI is limited. In this paper, we analyze uplink CUMA in multi-cell cellular networks using a stochastic geometry framework. We derive a tight approximate expression for the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) coverage probability, and further characterize the average user rate and cell sum-rate. The analysis quantifies how key design parameters impact performance and reveals the scaling behavior with network densification. Simulation results validate the accuracy of the derived expressions and show that uplink CUMA achieves competitive, and often superior, performance relative to conventional schemes under practical CSI constraints, highlighting its potential as a low-complexity, hardware-efficient uplink solution for future large-scale cellular networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper uses stochastic geometry to analyze uplink CUMA-enabled cellular networks, deriving a tight approximate SIR coverage probability expression along with average user rate and cell sum-rate characterizations. It concludes that CUMA achieves competitive and often superior performance relative to conventional schemes under practical CSI constraints, with analysis of design parameters and scaling with network densification, supported by simulations.

Significance. If the approximation holds, the work supplies a tractable framework for evaluating low-complexity port-selection uplink schemes in interference-limited multi-cell settings, with explicit quantification of densification scaling and limited-CSI benefits. The stochastic-geometry approach and simulation validation of expressions are strengths when the modeling assumptions are justified.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III (SIR coverage derivation)] The derivation of the approximate SIR coverage probability (abstract and Section III) rests on the modeling choice that inter-cell interference aggregates largely non-coherently due to independent random port selection per cell. The manuscript provides no quantitative error bound or additional verification (e.g., via moment comparison or geometry-aware simulation) on residual coherence induced by port locations; this assumption is load-bearing for the Laplace-transform step and all subsequent rate comparisons.
  2. [Rate results section / figures] Table or figure reporting rate comparisons (e.g., the cell sum-rate results): the claimed superiority of CUMA is shown only under the non-coherent interference model; without a sensitivity check on coherence, the performance advantage cannot be considered robust.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to a 'tight approximate expression' without citing the specific equation or theorem number where the approximation is stated and its tightness is quantified.
  2. [System model] Notation for port-selection probability and superposition weights should be introduced once with a clear reference to the system model equation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Section III (SIR coverage derivation)] The derivation of the approximate SIR coverage probability (abstract and Section III) rests on the modeling choice that inter-cell interference aggregates largely non-coherently due to independent random port selection per cell. The manuscript provides no quantitative error bound or additional verification (e.g., via moment comparison or geometry-aware simulation) on residual coherence induced by port locations; this assumption is load-bearing for the Laplace-transform step and all subsequent rate comparisons.

    Authors: The non-coherent aggregation follows directly from independent random port selection across cells, which randomizes the phases of interfering signals and justifies the Laplace-transform approach in Section III. The manuscript validates the resulting approximation through Monte Carlo simulations in Section IV that show close agreement with the derived SIR coverage probability. We acknowledge that an explicit quantitative bound on residual coherence is not provided. In the revision we will add a paragraph in Section III discussing the conditions under which the assumption holds and include supplementary simulation results that compare the model against controlled partial-coherence cases to quantify the approximation error. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Rate results section / figures] Table or figure reporting rate comparisons (e.g., the cell sum-rate results): the claimed superiority of CUMA is shown only under the non-coherent interference model; without a sensitivity check on coherence, the performance advantage cannot be considered robust.

    Authors: The rate comparisons in the current figures and tables are obtained under the non-coherent model used throughout the analysis. To strengthen the claims, the revised manuscript will incorporate an additional sensitivity figure that evaluates cell sum-rate under varying levels of interference coherence, thereby confirming whether the reported performance advantages persist. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard stochastic geometry derivation with independent simulation validation

full rationale

The paper applies the established stochastic geometry framework to derive an approximate SIR coverage probability expression under the stated non-coherent interference model, then characterizes rates and scaling. No quoted equations or steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the central claims rest on the modeling assumptions and are checked against independent Monte Carlo simulations rather than being tautological. This is the typical non-circular use of the framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields limited visibility into exact modeling choices; standard stochastic geometry point process assumptions appear to be the main background reliance.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Base stations distributed according to a homogeneous Poisson point process
    Standard modeling choice invoked for cellular network analysis in stochastic geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5793 in / 1125 out tokens · 25315 ms · 2026-05-25T04:03:18.563982+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Notice of retraction: Electromagnetic radiation due to cellular, Wi-Fi and bluet ooth technolo- gies: How safe are we?

    Naren, A. Elhence, V . Chamola, and M. Guizani, “Notice of retraction: Electromagnetic radiation due to cellular, Wi-Fi and bluet ooth technolo- gies: How safe are we?” IEEE Access , vol. 8, pp. 42 980–43 000, 2020

  2. [2]

    Internet of things (IoT) for next-generation smart system s: A review of current challenges, future trends and prospects for emer ging 5G-IoT scenarios,

    K. Shafique, B. A. Khawaja, F. Sabir, S. Qazi, and M. Mustaq im, “Internet of things (IoT) for next-generation smart system s: A review of current challenges, future trends and prospects for emer ging 5G-IoT scenarios,” IEEE Access , vol. 8, pp. 23 022–23 040, 2020

  3. [3]

    Cellular wireless networks in the upper mid-band,

    S. Kang et al., “Cellular wireless networks in the upper mid-band,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Society , vol. 5, pp. 2058–2075, 2024

  4. [4]

    A vision of 6G wireless sy stems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research pro blems,

    W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Chen, “A vision of 6G wireless sy stems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research pro blems,” IEEE Netw., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 134–142, May/Jun. 2020

  5. [5]

    Toward 6G networks: Use cases and technologies,

    M. Giordani, M. Polese, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, and M. Z orzi, “Toward 6G networks: Use cases and technologies,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 55–61, Mar. 2020

  6. [6]

    A speculative study on 6G,

    F. Tariq et al. , “A speculative study on 6G,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 118–125, Aug. 2020

  7. [7]

    Evolution of non-terrestrial networks from 5G to 6G: A survey,

    M. M. Azari et al. , “Evolution of non-terrestrial networks from 5G to 6G: A survey,” IEEE Commun. Surv. & Tuts. , vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2633– 2672, Fourthquarter 2022

  8. [8]

    Uplink scheduling in multi-cell OF DMA networks: A comprehensive study,

    Y . ¨Ozcan and C. Rosenberg, “Uplink scheduling in multi-cell OF DMA networks: A comprehensive study,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. , vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 3081–3098, Oct. 2021

  9. [9]

    Conditional regulariz ed zero- forcing precoding for multi-cell massive MIMO network,

    M. Guo, G. Xie, J. Gao, and Y . Liu, “Conditional regulariz ed zero- forcing precoding for multi-cell massive MIMO network,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. W orkshops (GC Wkshps) , 6-10 Dec. 2015, San Diego, CA, USA

  10. [10]

    Pilot contamination and precoding in multi-cell TDD systems,

    J. Jose, A. Ashikhmin, T. L. Marzetta, and S. Vishwanath , “Pilot contamination and precoding in multi-cell TDD systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 2640–2651, Aug. 2011

  11. [11]

    Powe r minimization for multi-cell uplink NOMA with imperfect SIC ,

    M. Zeng, W. Hao, O. A. Dobre, Z. Ding, and H. V . Poor, “Powe r minimization for multi-cell uplink NOMA with imperfect SIC ,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 2030–2034, Dec. 2020

  12. [12]

    Joint resource allocation and beamforming design in multi-cell multicarrier uplink RSMA transmission,

    L. Shan et al. , “Joint resource allocation and beamforming design in multi-cell multicarrier uplink RSMA transmission,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 10 434–10 450, 2026

  13. [13]

    On design of n on- orthogonal pilot signals for a multi-cell massive MIMO syst em,

    H. Wang, W. Zhang, Y . Liu, Q. Xu, and P . Pan, “On design of n on- orthogonal pilot signals for a multi-cell massive MIMO syst em,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 129–132, Apr. 2015

  14. [14]

    Massive M IMO networks: Spectral, energy, and hardware efficiency,

    E. Bj¨ ornson, J. Hoydis, and L. Sanguinetti, “Massive M IMO networks: Spectral, energy, and hardware efficiency,” F oundations & Trends Sig. Proc., vol. 11, no. 3-4, pp. 154–655, Nov. 2017

  15. [15]

    Making cell-free mas sive MIMO competitive with MMSE processing and centralized implemen tation,

    E. Bj¨ ornson and L. Sanguinetti, “Making cell-free mas sive MIMO competitive with MMSE processing and centralized implemen tation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 77–90, Jan. 2020

  16. [16]

    Pe rformance limits of fluid antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Pe rformance limits of fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2469–2472, Nov. 2020

  17. [17]

    Fl uid antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fl uid antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2021

  18. [18]

    Fluid antenna system—part I: Preliminaries,

    K. K. Wong, W. K. New, X. Hao, K.-F. Tong, and C.-B. Chae, “ Fluid antenna system—part I: Preliminaries,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1919–1923, Aug. 2023

  19. [19]

    A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hard- ware designs,

    W. K. New et al. , “A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hard- ware designs,” IEEE Commun. Surv. & Tut. , vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2325– 2377, Aug. 2025. 13

  20. [20]

    Fluid antennas: Reshaping intrinsic properties for flexible radiation characteristics in intelligent wireles s networks,

    W.-J. Lu et al. , “Fluid antennas: Reshaping intrinsic properties for flexible radiation characteristics in intelligent wireles s networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 40–45, May 2025

  21. [21]

    Fluid antenna systems: Redefining reconfigurable wireless communications,

    W. K. New et al. , “Fluid antenna systems: Redefining reconfigurable wireless communications,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 44, pp. 1013–1044, 2026

  22. [22]

    A contemporary survey on fluid antenna systems: Fundamentals and networking perspectives,

    H. Hong et al. , “A contemporary survey on fluid antenna systems: Fundamentals and networking perspectives,” IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng., vol. 13, pp. 2305–2328, 2026

  23. [23]

    Fluid antenna systems enabling 6G: Principles, applica- tions, and research directions,

    T. Wu et al. , “Fluid antenna systems enabling 6G: Principles, applica- tions, and research directions,” to appear in IEEE Wireless Commun. , DOI:10.1109/MWC.2025.3629597, 2025

  24. [24]

    Fundamental analysis of scalable fluid antenna systems: Identifiability limits, information theory, and joint proc essing,

    T. Wu et al. , “Fundamental analysis of scalable fluid antenna systems: Identifiability limits, information theory, and joint proc essing,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2604.00408, 2026

  25. [25]

    Historical review of fluid antenna and movable antenna,

    L. Zhu and K. K. Wong, “Historical review of fluid antenna and movable antenna,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2401.02362, 2024

  26. [26]

    Design and experimental validation of mmWave surface wave enabled fluid antennas for future wireless communicati ons,

    Y . Shen et al., “Design and experimental validation of mmWave surface wave enabled fluid antennas for future wireless communicati ons,” IEEE Antennas & Wireless Propag. Lett. , vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1467–1471, Apr. 2026

  27. [27]

    Electromagnetically reconfigurable fluid antenna system for wireless communications: Design, modeling, algorithm , fabrication, and experiment,

    R. Wang et al., “Electromagnetically reconfigurable fluid antenna system for wireless communications: Design, modeling, algorithm , fabrication, and experiment,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 44, pp. 1464–1479, 2026

  28. [28]

    Fluid antenna systems enabled by reconfigurable holographic surfaces: Beamforming design and experimenta l validation,

    S. Zhang et al. , “Fluid antenna systems enabled by reconfigurable holographic surfaces: Beamforming design and experimenta l validation,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. , vol. 44, pp. 1417–1431, 2026

  29. [29]

    P ro- grammable meta-fluid antenna for spatial multiplexing in fa st fluctuating radio channels,

    B. Liu, K.-F. Tong, K. K. Wong, C.-B. Chae, and H. Wong, “P ro- grammable meta-fluid antenna for spatial multiplexing in fa st fluctuating radio channels,” Optics Express, vol. 33, no. 13, pp. 28898–28915, 2025

  30. [30]

    A novel pixel-based reconfigurable antenna applied in fluid antenna systems with high switching speed,

    J. Zhang et al. , “A novel pixel-based reconfigurable antenna applied in fluid antenna systems with high switching speed,” IEEE Open J. Antennas & Propag. , vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 212–228, Feb. 2025

  31. [31]

    Wideban d pixel-based fluid antenna system: An antenna design for smar t city,

    B. Liu, T. Wu, K. K. Wong, H. Wong, and K. F. Tong, “Wideban d pixel-based fluid antenna system: An antenna design for smar t city,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 6850–6862, Feb. 2026

  32. [32]

    Rec on- figurable pixel antennas meet fluid antenna systems: A paradi gm shift to electromagnetic signal and information processing,

    K. K. Wong, C. Wang, S. Shen, C.-B. Chae and R. Murch, “Rec on- figurable pixel antennas meet fluid antenna systems: A paradi gm shift to electromagnetic signal and information processing,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 191–198, Feb. 2026

  33. [33]

    Fluid antenna multiple access for 6G: A holistic review,

    H. Hong et al., “Fluid antenna multiple access for 6G: A holistic review,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. , vol. 7, pp. 2607–2633, 2026

  34. [34]

    Fluid antenna multiple acces s,

    K. K. Wong and K.-F. Tong, “Fluid antenna multiple acces s,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 4801–4815, Jul. 2022

  35. [35]

    Fast fluid a ntenna multiple access enabling massive connectivity,

    K. K. Wong, K.-F. Tong, Y . Chen, and Y . Zhang, “Fast fluid a ntenna multiple access enabling massive connectivity,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 711–715, Feb. 2023

  36. [36]

    Slow fluid antenna multiple access,

    K. K. Wong, D. Morales-Jimenez, K. F. Tong, and C.-B. Cha e, “Slow fluid antenna multiple access,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 2831–2846, May 2023

  37. [37]

    On fundamental limits of slow-fluid antenna multiple access for unsourced random access,

    Z. Zhang et al. , “On fundamental limits of slow-fluid antenna multiple access for unsourced random access,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 3455–3459, Nov. 2025

  38. [38]

    Cod ed fluid antenna multiple access over fast fading channels,

    H. Hong, K. K. Wong, K.-F. Tong, H. Shin and Y . Zhang, “Cod ed fluid antenna multiple access over fast fading channels,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett , vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1249–1253, Apr. 2025

  39. [39]

    5G-coded fluid antenna multiple access over block fading channels

    H. Hong, K. K. Wong, K.-F. Wong, H. Xu and H. Li, “5G-coded fluid antenna multiple access over block fading channels” Electron. Lett., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. e70166, Jan. 2025

  40. [40]

    Downlink OFDM-FAMA in 5G-NR systems,

    H. Hong et al. , “Downlink OFDM-FAMA in 5G-NR systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 10116–10132, Dec. 2025

  41. [41]

    Turbocha rging fluid antenna multiple access,

    N. Waqar, K. K. Wong, C.-B. Chae, and R. Murch, “Turbocha rging fluid antenna multiple access,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communica- tions, vol. 25, pp. 4038–4052, 2026

  42. [42]

    Attentio nal copula- aided turbo fluid antenna massive access,

    N. Waqar, K. K. Wong, C.-B. Chae, and R. Murch, “Attentio nal copula- aided turbo fluid antenna massive access,” IEEE Wireless Communica- tions Letters , vol. 15, pp. 1951–1955, 2026

  43. [43]

    Codebook-based port selection and combining for CSI-free uplink fluid antenna multiple access,

    C. Rao et al. , “Codebook-based port selection and combining for CSI-free uplink fluid antenna multiple access,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 13 401–13 415, 2026

  44. [44]

    Compact ultra mas sive antenna array: A simple open-loop massive connectivity sch eme,

    K. K. Wong, C.-B. Chae and K.-F. Tong, “Compact ultra mas sive antenna array: A simple open-loop massive connectivity sch eme,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6279–6294, Jun. 2024

  45. [45]

    Transmitter CSI-free RIS-randomized CUMA for extreme massive connectivity,

    K. K. Wong, “Transmitter CSI-free RIS-randomized CUMA for extreme massive connectivity,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Society , vol. 5, pp. 6890– 6902, 2024

  46. [46]

    Geometric port selection in CUMA systems,

    C. Rao et al. , “Geometric port selection in CUMA systems,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2509.20299, 2025

  47. [47]

    Compact ultra massive antenna arrays under mutual cou- pling: Modeling and spectral efficiency analysis,

    J. Lu et al. , “Compact ultra massive antenna arrays under mutual cou- pling: Modeling and spectral efficiency analysis,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, pp. 3174–3189, 2026

  48. [48]

    CUMA uplin k for interference-resilient multi-cell networks,

    C. Rao, K.-K. Wong, Y . Zhang, and C.-B. Chae, “CUMA uplin k for interference-resilient multi-cell networks,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 2249–2253, 2026

  49. [49]

    Stochastic geometry and random graphs f or the analysis and design of wireless networks,

    M. Haenggi, J. G. Andrews, F. Baccelli, O. Dousse, and M. Franceschetti, “Stochastic geometry and random graphs f or the analysis and design of wireless networks,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1029–1046, Sept. 2009

  50. [50]

    Modeling and analysis of cellular networks using stochastic geometr y: A tutorial,

    H. ElSawy, A. Sultan-Salem, M.-S. Alouini, and M. Z. Win , “Modeling and analysis of cellular networks using stochastic geometr y: A tutorial,” IEEE Commun. Surv. & Tuts. , vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 167–203, Firstquarter 2017

  51. [51]

    New trends in stochastic geometry for wireless netw orks: A tutorial and survey,

    Y . Hmamouche, M. Benjillali, S. Saoudi, H. Y anikomerog lu, and M. D. Renzo, “New trends in stochastic geometry for wireless netw orks: A tutorial and survey,” Proc. IEEE , vol. 109, no. 7, pp. 1200–1252, Jul. 2021

  52. [52]

    Stochastic geometry modeling a nd system- level analysis of uplink heterogeneous cellular networks w ith multi- antenna base stations,

    M. Di Renzo and P . Guan, “Stochastic geometry modeling a nd system- level analysis of uplink heterogeneous cellular networks w ith multi- antenna base stations,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2453– 2476, Jun. 2016

  53. [53]

    On the meta distribution o f coverage probability in uplink cellular networks,

    H. ElSawy and M.-S. Alouini, “On the meta distribution o f coverage probability in uplink cellular networks,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1625–1628, Jul. 2017

  54. [54]

    On some inequalities for the incomplete gamm a function,

    H. Alzer, “On some inequalities for the incomplete gamm a function,” Mathematics Computation , vol. 66, no. 218, pp. 771–778, 1997

  55. [55]

    Wide- band millimeter-wave propagation measurements and channel models for future wireless communication system design,

    T. S. Rappaport, G. R. MacCartney, M. K. Samimi, and S. Su n, “Wide- band millimeter-wave propagation measurements and channel models for future wireless communication system design,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 3029–3056, Sept. 2015

  56. [56]

    Movable-antenna en hanced multiuser communication via antenna position optimizatio n,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, B. Ning, and R. Zhang, “Movable-antenna en hanced multiuser communication via antenna position optimizatio n,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7214–7229, Jul. 2024

  57. [57]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of integrals, series, and products, Academic press, 2014

  58. [58]

    Sect ion 15.2: Defi- nitions and basic properties,

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, “Sect ion 15.2: Defi- nitions and basic properties,” https://dlmf.nist.gov/15.2, accessed: 2026- 04-14