pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23433 · v1 · pith:D4ALVTO4new · submitted 2026-05-22 · ⚛️ nucl-th · astro-ph.HE

Quasiradial oscillations of rotating hybrid neutron stars

Zi-Yue Zheng , Ting-Ting Sun , Huan Chen , Xiao-Ping Zheng , Jin-Biao Wei , G. F. Burgio , H.-J. Schulze This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th astro-ph.HE
keywords quasiradial oscillationshybrid neutron starsslow rotation approximationquark matterGibbs constructionspin-downequations of stateneutron star oscillations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hybrid neutron stars display characteristic differences in quasiradial oscillation frequencies from pure neutron stars as they spin down.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates fundamental quasiradial oscillations of rotating hybrid neutron stars and pure neutron stars using the slow-rotation approximation. It employs nuclear equations of state from Brueckner-Hartree-Fock theory or the relativistic mean field model, and quark matter from the Dyson-Schwinger quark model, with a Gibbs construction for the mixed phase. The central result is that hybrid stars and pure neutron stars exhibit distinct behaviors in their fundamental frequencies during spin-down. A sympathetic reader would care because such differences could provide a way to probe the internal structure and composition of compact stars through their oscillation properties.

Core claim

Employing the slow-rotation approximation, the fundamental quasiradial oscillation frequencies of hybrid stars constructed with a Gibbs mixed phase between nuclear and quark matter differ characteristically from those of pure neutron stars as the stars lose rotation.

What carries the argument

Quasiradial oscillations calculated in the slow-rotation approximation for hybrid stars with nuclear and quark matter phases connected by Gibbs construction.

If this is right

  • Characteristic frequency differences appear between the two types of stars during spin-down.
  • The differences depend on the specific choice of equations of state for nuclear and quark matter.
  • These frequencies could serve as potential observables for identifying hybrid stars.
  • The slow-rotation limit allows tracking frequency changes with decreasing angular velocity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If confirmed, these differences might be detectable in future gravitational wave observations of spinning compact objects.
  • Similar calculations could be extended to faster rotations to check if the distinctions persist.
  • The results highlight the sensitivity of oscillation modes to the presence of a quark phase.

Load-bearing premise

The slow-rotation approximation combined with the selected nuclear and quark equations of state and Gibbs construction sufficiently captures the physics producing observable frequency differences.

What would settle it

Detection of quasiradial oscillation frequencies in a spin-down sequence of a compact star that match neither the pure neutron star nor hybrid star predictions from these models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23433 by G. F. Burgio, H.-J. Schulze, Huan Chen, Jin-Biao Wei, Ting-Ting Sun, Xiao-Ping Zheng, Zi-Yue Zheng.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The baryonic (a) and gravitational NS mass (b) versus equa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) shows the O(Ω2 ) fundamental (Q)RO frequency f = ω/2π, Eq. (62), along both static and Keplerian se￾quences, as a function of the central baryon number density ρc. In general, as the star’s equatorial radius increases due to rotation, its matter becomes more dilute, leading to a decrease of the QRO frequency as the rotation rate approaches the Ke￾plerian limit. The RMF EOS with the smaller Γ yields low… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Fundamental QRO frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The time evolution of rotation frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate fundamental quasiradial oscillations in slow-rotation approximation of pure and hybrid neutron stars, employing equations of state of nuclear matter from Brueckner-Hartree-Fock theory or the relativistic mean field model, and of quark matter from the Dyson-Schwinger quark model, performing a Gibbs construction for the mixed phase in hybrid stars. Characteristic differences between neutron-star and hybrid-star fundamental quasiradial oscillation frequencies during spin-down are pointed out.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes fundamental quasiradial oscillation frequencies for sequences of slowly rotating pure neutron stars and hybrid stars. Nuclear EOS are taken from Brueckner-Hartree-Fock theory or the relativistic mean-field model, quark matter from the Dyson-Schwinger model, and the mixed phase is constructed via the Gibbs prescription. The central result is the identification of characteristic differences in the dependence of these frequencies on angular velocity as the stars spin down.

Significance. If the reported frequency differences prove robust, the work supplies a potential observational discriminant between pure hadronic and hybrid stars that could be tested with future gravitational-wave or electromagnetic data on spinning-down compact objects. The explicit use of two distinct nuclear EOS models and a microphysically motivated quark EOS constitutes a modest but concrete strength in exploring model dependence.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract and introduction should explicitly state the range of angular velocities considered and confirm that all models remain within the slow-rotation regime throughout the spin-down sequences.
  2. Figure captions (or the text near the frequency-vs-angular-velocity plots) should report the numerical resolution or grid parameters used for the radial integration of the perturbation equations.
  3. A brief statement on the treatment of the surface boundary condition for the hybrid-star models would clarify how the density discontinuity at the quark-hadron interface is handled in the oscillation equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation for minor revision. The recognition that the reported frequency differences could serve as an observational discriminant, together with the value placed on our use of multiple nuclear EOS models and a microphysically motivated quark EOS, is appreciated. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper computes quasiradial frequencies via the standard slow-rotation approximation applied to sequences of stellar models constructed from independent nuclear (BHF/RMF) and quark (Dyson-Schwinger) EOS with a Gibbs mixed-phase construction. No step equates a derived frequency to a fitted parameter by definition, renames a known result, or reduces the central claim to a self-citation chain. The reported differences in spin-down behavior follow directly from solving the perturbation equations on the chosen models; the derivation chain remains independent of its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5621 in / 1051 out tokens · 25532 ms · 2026-05-25T02:57:20.200035+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

173 extracted references · 173 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    [94] an- alyzed the effect of central density on the QRO frequencies of pure NSs, HSs, and quark stars in the presence of typical magnetic fields

    studied the impact of the polytropic index on the QRO frequencies under the slow-rotation approximation. [94] an- alyzed the effect of central density on the QRO frequencies of pure NSs, HSs, and quark stars in the presence of typical magnetic fields. The spin-down of a rotating NS can lead to a hadron- quark (HQ) phase transition once a critical central ...

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    It satisfies the following equation [132]: r4 j¯w′ ′ +4r 3 j′ ¯w=0,(29) wherej(r)≡e −[ν(r)+λ(r)]/2

    First-order equations In this frame, ¯w(r)≡Ω−w 0(r)represents the angular ve- locity of the fluid element relative to the local inertial frame to orderΩ. It satisfies the following equation [132]: r4 j¯w′ ′ +4r 3 j′ ¯w=0,(29) wherej(r)≡e −[ν(r)+λ(r)]/2 . Starting with an arbitrary value for ¯wand ¯w′ =0 atr=0, one can integrate this differential equation ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Second-order equations For a rotating star, the fluid element is displaced, thus its energy density and pressure change. In a reference frame that is momentarily moving with the fluid, the pressure and energy density can be written as p(r,θ) =p(r) +q(r) [p 0(r) +p 2(r)P2],(32) ε(r,θ) =ε(r) +q(r)c −2 e [p0(r) +p 2(r)P2],(33) wherec 2 e =d p/dεis the square...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Assuming that the rotating configuration shares the same central density as its nonrotating counterpart implies the boundary conditionsm 0(0) =0 andp 0(0) =0 at the center

    Spherical deformation From thel=0 part of the Einstein field equation, and know- ing ¯w(r), one can obtain the first-order differential equations form 0(r)andp 0(r)[132, 133], m′ 0 =4πre λ c−2 e qp0 − eλ r 1−8πr 2ε m0 + r3e−ν 12 (¯w′)2 + 8π 3 r3eλ−ν q¯w2 ,(36) p′ 0 =−4πre λ qp0 − eλ r 1+8πr 2p m0 + r3e−ν 12 (¯w′)2 + 1 3 (r2e−ν ¯w2)′ .(37) These two equati...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Quadrupole deformation The quadrupole moment depends on thel=2 perturbative functionsh 2,m 2,v 2,p 2. According to Hartle’s approach [132], the differential equations forh 2 andv 2 are h′ 2 = r4 j2 6 ν ′ 2 − eλ r2ν ′ (¯w′)2 − r3(j 2)′ 3 ν ′ 2 + eλ r2ν ′ ¯w2 + eλ ν ′ 8πq− 4m r3 −ν ′ h2 − 4eλ r2ν ′ v2 ,(42) v′ 2 = 1 r + ν ′ 2 r4 j2 6 (¯w′)2 − r3(j 2)′ 3 ¯w2...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Third-order equations To orderΩ 3, the perturbation functionsw 1 andw 3 will en- ter. The corrections to angular momentum and moment of inertia only depend on the functionw 1, which is determined by the second-order differential equation [134, 135] (r4 jw′ 1)′ +4r 3 j′w1 =D 0 −D 2/5,(50) where D0 =−r 4 j h0 +m 0 ′ ¯w′ −4r 3 j′ 2m0 + dq d pp0 + 2 3r2e−ν ¯w...

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, J. N ¨attil¨a, and A. Vuorinen, Evidence for quark-matter cores in massive neutron stars, Na- ture Phys.16, 907 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    G. F. Burgio, H.-J. Schulze, I. Vida ˜na, and J.-B. Wei, Neutron stars and the nuclear equation of state, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103879 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Chatziioannou, H

    K. Chatziioannou, H. T. Cromartie, S. Gandolfi, I. Tews, D. Radice, A. W. Steiner, and A. L. Watts, Neutron stars and the dense matter equation of state, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 045007 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Z. H. Li and H.-J. Schulze, Neutron star structure with modern nucleonic three-body forces, Phys. Rev. C78, 028801 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Kohno, Nuclear and neutron matter G-matrix calculations with a chiral effective field theory potential including effects of three-nucleon interactions, Phys

    M. Kohno, Nuclear and neutron matter G-matrix calculations with a chiral effective field theory potential including effects of three-nucleon interactions, Phys. Rev. C88, 064005 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Fukukawa, M

    K. Fukukawa, M. Baldo, G. F. Burgio, L. Lo Monaco, and H.-J. Schulze, Nuclear matter equation of state from a quark- model nucleon-nucleon interaction, Phys. Rev. C92, 065802 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    J. J. Lu, Z. H. Li, G. F. Burgio, A. Figura, and H.-J. Schulze, Hot neutron stars with microscopic equations of state, Phys. Rev. C100, 054335 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    J.-B. Wei, G. F. Burgio, A. R. Raduta, and H.-J. Schulze, Hot neutron stars and their equation of state, Phys. Rev. C104, 065806 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    H.-M. Liu, J. Zhang, Z.-H. Li, J.-B. Wei, G. F. Burgio, and H.- J. Schulze, Microscopic nuclear equation of state at finite tem- perature and stellar stability, Phys. Rev. C106, 025801 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Ring, Relativistic mean field in finite nuclei, Prog

    P. Ring, Relativistic mean field in finite nuclei, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.37, 193 (1996)

    work page 1996

  17. [17]

    Hornick, L

    N. Hornick, L. Tolos, A. Zacchi, J.-E. Christian, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Relativistic parameterizations of neutron matter and implications for neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C98, 065804 (2018), Erratum: Phys. Rev. C 103, 039902 (2021)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    H. Shen, F. Ji, J. Hu, and K. Sumiyoshi, Effects of symmetry energy on the equation of state for simulations of core-collapse supernovae and neutron-star mergers, Astrophys. J.891, 148 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    A. Y . Potekhin, A. F. Fantina, N. Chamel, J. M. Pearson, and S. Goriely, Analytical representations of unified equations of state for neutron-star matter, Astron. Astrophys.560, A48 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Carbone, A

    A. Carbone, A. Rios, and A. Polls, Symmetric nuclear matter with chiral three-nucleon forces in the self-consistent Green’s functions approach, Phys. Rev. C88, 044302 (2013)

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    Akmal, V

    A. Akmal, V . R. Pandharipande, and D. G. Ravenhall, Equa- tion of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure, Phys. Rev. C58, 1804 (1998)

    work page 1998

  22. [22]

    Hebeler, S

    K. Hebeler, S. K. Bogner, R. J. Furnstahl, A. Nogga, and A. Schwenk, Improved nuclear matter calculations from chiral low-momentum interactions, Phys. Rev. C83, 031301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Coraggio, J

    L. Coraggio, J. W. Holt, N. Itaco, R. Machleidt, L. E. Mar- cucci, and F. Sammarruca, Nuclear-matter equation of state with consistent two- and three-body perturbative chiral inter- actions, Phys. Rev. C89, 044321 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Chodos, R

    A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C. B. Thorn, and V . F. Weisskopf, A new extended model of hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3471 (1974)

    work page 1974

  25. [25]

    Schertler, S

    K. Schertler, S. Leupold, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Neutron stars and quark phases in the NJL model, Phys. Rev. C60, 025801 (1999)

    work page 1999

  26. [26]

    Buballa, NJL model analysis of quark matter at large den- sity, Phys

    M. Buballa, NJL model analysis of quark matter at large den- sity, Phys. Rept.407, 205 (2005)

    work page 2005

  27. [27]

    Kl ¨ahn, R

    T. Kl ¨ahn, R. Lastowiecki, and D. B. Blaschke, Implications of the measurement of pulsars with two solar masses for quark matter in compact stars and heavy-ion collisions: a Nambu- Jona-Lasinio model case study, Phys. Rev. D88, 085001 (2013). 14

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    Kl ¨ahn and T

    T. Kl ¨ahn and T. Fischer, Vector interaction enhanced bag model for astrophysical applications, Astrophys. J.810, 134 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Li, S.-Y

    C.-M. Li, S.-Y . Zuo, Y . Yan, Y .-P. Zhao, F. Wang, Y .-F. Huang, and H.-S. Zong, Strange quark stars within proper time reg- ularized (2+1)-flavor NJL model, Phys. Rev. D101, 063023 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Liu, X.-M

    H. Liu, X.-M. Zhang, and P.-C. Chu, Properties of quark- matter cores in massive hybrid stars, Phys. Rev. D107, 094032 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Kurkela, P

    A. Kurkela, P. Romatschke, and A. Vuorinen, Cold quark mat- ter, Phys. Rev. D81, 105021 (2010)

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    E. S. Fraga, A. Kurkela, and A. Vuorinen, Interacting quark matter equation of state for compact stars, Astrophys. J.781, L25 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    J. C. Jim ´enez and E. S. Fraga, Radial oscillations of quark stars from perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. D100, 114041 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Somasundaram, I

    R. Somasundaram, I. Tews, and J. Margueron, Perturbative QCD and the neutron star equation of state, Phys. Rev. C107, L052801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Finch, I

    E. Finch, I. Legred, K. Chatziioannou, R. Essick, S. Han, and P. Landry, Unified nonparametric equation-of-state infer- ence from the neutron-star crust to perturbative-QCD densi- ties, Phys. Rev. D112, 103023 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Y .-L. Tian, Y . Yan, H. Li, X.-L. Luo, and H.-S. Zong, Equation of state of a quasiparticle model at finite chemical potential and quark star, Phys. Rev. D85, 045009 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    T. Zhao, Y . Yan, X.-L. Luo, and H.-S. Zong, Study of rota- tional quark stars and hybrid stars based on the latest equation of state and observation data, Phys. Rev. D91, 034018 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    Li, Z.-F

    B.-L. Li, Z.-F. Cui, Z.-H. Yu, Y . Yan, S. An, and H.-S. Zong, Structures of the strange quark stars within a quasiparticle model, Phys. Rev. D99, 043001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    B.-L. Li, Y . Yan, and J.-L. Ping, Strange quark mass depen- dence of strange quark star properties, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 921 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Zacchi, R

    A. Zacchi, R. Stiele, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Compact stars in a SU(3) quark-meson model, Phys. Rev. D92, 045022 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Zacchi, M

    A. Zacchi, M. Hanauske, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Stable hy- brid stars within a SU(3) quark-meson-model, Phys. Rev. D 93, 065011 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    C. D. Roberts and A. G. Williams, Dyson-Schwinger equa- tions and their application to hadronic physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.33, 477 (1994)

    work page 1994

  43. [43]

    Alkofer and L

    R. Alkofer and L. von Smekal, The infrared behavior of QCD Green’s functions: confinement dynamical symmetry break- ing, and hadrons as relativistic bound states, Phys. Rept.353, 281 (2001)

    work page 2001

  44. [44]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo and Virgo Collabo- rations), GW170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo and Virgo Collab- orations), GW190425: observation of a compact binary coa- lescence with total mass∼3.4M ⊙, Astrophys. J. Lett.892, L3 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo and Virgo Col- laborations), Properties of the binary neutron star merger GW170817, Phys. Rev. X9, 011001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo and Virgo Collabo- rations), GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo and Virgo Collab- orations), Estimating the contribution of dynamical ejecta in the kilonova associated with GW170817, Astrophys. J. Lett. 850, L39 (2017)

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    M. C. Milleret al., The radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton data, Astrophys. J. Lett.918, L28 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    P. T. H. Pang, I. Tews, M. W. Coughlin, M. Bulla, C. Van Den Broeck, and T. Dietrich, Nuclear physics multimessenger astrophysics constraints on the neutron star equation of state: adding NICER’s PSR J0740+6620 measurement, Astrophys. J.922, 14 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Raaijmakers, S

    G. Raaijmakers, S. K. Greif, K. Hebeler, T. Hinderer, S. Nis- sanke, A. Schwenk, T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, J. M. Lattimer, and W. C. G. Ho, Constraints on the dense matter equation of state and neutron star properties from NICER’s mass-radius estimate of PSR J0740+6620 and multimessenger observa- tions, Astrophys. J. Lett.918, L29 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Rutherfordet al., Constraining the dense matter equation of state with new NICER mass–radius measurements and new chiral effective field theory inputs, Astrophys

    N. Rutherfordet al., Constraining the dense matter equation of state with new NICER mass–radius measurements and new chiral effective field theory inputs, Astrophys. J. Lett.971, L19 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Mauviardet al., A NICER view of the 1.4M ⊙ edge-on pul- sar PSR J0614-3329, Astrophys

    L. Mauviardet al., A NICER view of the 1.4M ⊙ edge-on pul- sar PSR J0614-3329, Astrophys. J.995, 60 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    M. C. Milleret al., The radius of PSR J0437-4715 from NICER data, Astrophys. J. Lett.1000, L48 (2026)

    work page 2026

  56. [56]

    K. S. Thorne and A. Campolattaro, Non-radial pulsation of general-relativistic stellar models. I. Analytic analysis forl≥ 2, Astrophys. J.149, 591 (1967)

    work page 1967

  57. [57]

    Radice, V

    D. Radice, V . Morozova, A. Burrows, D. Vartanyan, and H. Nagakura, Characterizing the gravitational wave signal from core-collapse supernovae, Astrophys. J. Lett.876, L9 (2019)

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    K. D. Kokkotas, T. A. Apostolatos, and N. Andersson, The in- verse problem for pulsating neutron stars: a ‘fingerprint anal- ysis’ for the supranuclear equation of state, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc.320, 307 (2001)

    work page 2001

  59. [59]

    Stergioulas, A

    N. Stergioulas, A. Bauswein, K. Zagkouris, and H.-T. Janka, Gravitational waves and non-axisymmetric oscillation modes in mergers of compact object binaries, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.418, 427 (2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    Vretinaris, N

    S. Vretinaris, N. Stergioulas, and A. Bauswein, Empirical re- lations for gravitational-wave asteroseismology of binary neu- tron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D101, 084039 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    Soultanis, A

    T. Soultanis, A. Bauswein, and N. Stergioulas, Analytic mod- els of the spectral properties of gravitational waves from neu- tron star merger remnants, Phys. Rev. D105, 043020 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    D. D. Doneva, E. Gaertig, K. D. Kokkotas, and C. Kr ¨uger, Gravitational wave asteroseismology of fast rotating neutron stars with realistic equations of state, Phys. Rev. D88, 044052 (2013)

    work page 2013

  63. [63]

    W. Wei, M. Salinas, T. Kl¨ahn, P. Jaikumar, and M. Barry, Lift- ing the veil on quark matter in compact stars with coreg-mode oscillations, Astrophys. J.904, 187 (2020)

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Bai, W.-J

    Z. Bai, W.-J. Fu, and Y .-X. Liu, Identifying QCD phase tran- sitions via the gravitational wave frequency from a supernova explosion, Astrophys. J.922, 266 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Jaikumar, A

    P. Jaikumar, A. Semposki, M. Prakash, and C. Constantinou, g-mode oscillations in hybrid stars: a tale of two sounds, Phys. Rev. D103, 123009 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    Constantinou, S

    C. Constantinou, S. Han, P. Jaikumar, and M. Prakash, g modes of neutron stars with hadron-to-quark crossover tran- 15 sitions, Phys. Rev. D104, 123032 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    T. Zhao, C. Constantinou, P. Jaikumar, and M. Prakash, Quasi- normal g modes of neutron stars with quarks, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103025 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    Zheng, T.-T

    Z.-Y . Zheng, T.-T. Sun, H. Chen, J.-B. Wei, G. F. Burgio, and H.-J. Schulze, Nonradial oscillations and gravitational wave emission of hybrid neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D107, 103048 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    V . A. Dommes and M. E. Gusakov, Oscillations of superfluid hyperon stars: decoupling scheme andg-modes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.455, 2852 (2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    V . Tran, S. Ghosh, N. Lozano, D. Chatterjee, and P. Jaikumar, g-mode oscillations in neutron stars with hyperons, Phys. Rev. C108, 015803 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    E. M. Kantor and M. E. Gusakov, Composition temperature- dependentg-modes in superfluid neutron stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.442, 90 (2014)

    work page 2014

  72. [72]

    Yu and N

    H. Yu and N. N. Weinberg, Resonant tidal excitation of super- fluid neutron stars in coalescing binaries, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.464, 2622 (2017)

    work page 2017

  73. [73]

    P. B. Rau and I. Wasserman, Compressional modes in two- superfluid neutron stars with leptonic buoyancy, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.481, 4427 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    Kunjipurayil, T

    A. Kunjipurayil, T. Zhao, B. Kumar, B. K. Agrawal, and M. Prakash, Impact of the equation of state onf- andp-mode oscillations of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D106, 063005 (2022)

    work page 2022

  75. [75]

    Andersson and K

    N. Andersson and K. D. Kokkotas, Towards gravitational wave asteroseismology, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.299, 1059 (1998)

    work page 1998

  76. [76]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasi-normal modes of stars and black holes, Living Reviews in Relativity2, 2 (1999)

    work page 1999

  77. [77]

    B. K. Pradhan, D. Chatterjee, M. Lanoye, and P. Jaikumar, General relativistic treatment off-mode oscillations of hyper- onic stars, Phys. Rev. C106, 015805 (2022)

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    T. K. Chan, Y .-H. Sham, P. T. Leung, and L.-M. Lin, Multipo- lar universal relations betweenf-mode frequency and tidal de- formability of compact stars, Phys. Rev. D90, 124023 (2014)

    work page 2014

  79. [79]

    Sotani and B

    H. Sotani and B. Kumar, Universal relations between the quasinormal modes of neutron star and tidal deformability, Phys. Rev. D104, 123002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  80. [80]

    Zhao and J

    T. Zhao and J. M. Lattimer, Universal relations for neutron star f-mode andg-mode oscillations, Phys. Rev. D106, 123002 (2022)

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.