pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23538 · v1 · pith:DELNPDXTnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Scalable Dark Siren Cosmology with gwcosmo: GPU Acceleration, Validation and Systematics

Alexander Papadopoulos , Christian E. A. Chapman-Bird , Rachel Gray , Christopher Messenger , Tom Bertheas This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 03:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords dark siren cosmologygravitational wave eventsGPU accelerationcosmological inferencehierarchical analysiscatalogue scalabilitygwcosmo pipeline
0
0 comments X

The pith

A GPU-accelerated gwcosmo processes full gravitational-wave catalogues 1000 times faster than the prior CPU version.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper upgrades the gwcosmo pipeline to run cosmological inference on graphics processing units by vectorizing operations and handling the entire catalogue in parallel at each step. This produces a 1000-fold reduction in runtime relative to the earlier CPU implementation. The change makes it practical to include every detected event, including the numerous weaker ones, when deriving cosmological parameters from dark sirens. Readers would care because population-level analyses have grown too slow to keep pace with expanding gravitational-wave catalogues without discarding data.

Core claim

The upgraded gwcosmo leverages vectorisation on graphics processing units to process the entire gravitational-wave catalogue in parallel with each iteration. This achieves a speed-up of 1000 times over the previous version, facilitating analyses of O5-like numbers of GW events on wall-clock timescales of hours. The results demonstrate the scalability of the gwcosmo pipeline for the increasing computational load of expanding event catalogues.

What carries the argument

The GPU vectorization and parallel implementation of the gwcosmo cosmological inference pipeline, which integrates over each gravitational-wave source's localisation volume.

If this is right

  • Analyses of O5-scale gravitational-wave catalogues become feasible within hours rather than days or weeks.
  • Complete event lists, including quieter sources, can be retained in dark-siren inference without computational truncation.
  • The pipeline scales to the growing size of future gravitational-wave catalogues.
  • Population-level hierarchical analyses can incorporate the full catalogue information at each iteration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Faster runtimes could support updating cosmological constraints each time a new confident event is added to the catalogue.
  • The same parallelisation strategy may transfer to other hierarchical inference problems that integrate over localisation volumes.
  • Validation against the CPU baseline lowers the chance that hardware-specific rounding alters final cosmological constraints.

Load-bearing premise

The GPU implementation reproduces the cosmological inference results of the prior CPU version without numerical discrepancies or biases.

What would settle it

A side-by-side run of the CPU and GPU versions on identical event data that produces statistically different cosmological parameter posteriors would show the acceleration changes the inference.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23538 by Alexander Papadopoulos, Christian E. A. Chapman-Bird, Christopher Messenger, Rachel Gray, Tom Bertheas.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Sequential CPU based likelihood evaluation scheme. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Parallel GPU based likelihood evaluation scheme. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Mean single likelihood evaluations times for the CPU [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Corner plot of recovered hyperparameters using a simulated set of 2000 GW events at O5 sensitivity using the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison of posteriors produced using the legacy CPU implementation and the GPU implementation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. KL divergences calculated from two identical normal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Bayesian inference wall-clock time comparison us [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

As the number of confident gravitational-wave detections grows, population-level hierarchical analyses face increasing computational costs. Dark-siren cosmological inference integrates over the localisation volume of each gravitational-wave source. To remain feasible without discarding information from the quieter but more numerous sources in the catalogue, significant efficiency improvements are vital for analysis pipelines. In this work, we present an upgraded version of the cosmological inference pipeline gwcosmo, which leverages vectorisation on graphics processing units to process the entire gravitational-wave catalogue in parallel with each iteration. This new implementation achieves a speed-up of 1000 times over the previous version, facilitating analyses of O5-like numbers of GW events on wall-clock timescales of hours. Our results demonstrate the scalability of the gwcosmo pipeline, specifically its ability to handle the increasing computational load of expanding event catalogues, positioning it as a vital tool for future advances in dark-siren cosmology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an upgraded version of the gwcosmo pipeline for dark-siren cosmological inference. It uses GPU vectorization and parallel processing to analyze entire gravitational-wave catalogues simultaneously, claiming a 1000x wall-clock speedup over the prior CPU implementation. This enables feasible analyses of O5-scale event numbers (hundreds of events) in hours rather than longer timescales, with results demonstrating scalability and including validation against previous versions plus systematics studies.

Significance. If the GPU implementation is shown to reproduce the CPU results without introducing numerical biases or discrepancies in the recovered cosmological parameters (particularly H0), the work would be significant for the field. It directly addresses the computational bottleneck in hierarchical dark-siren analyses as GW catalogues grow, providing a practical tool for future LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing runs and positioning gwcosmo as scalable for population-level cosmology.

major comments (2)
  1. [Validation section] Validation section: The central claim of a 1000x speedup enabling O5 analyses rests on the assumption that the GPU-parallel implementation produces statistically identical posteriors to the validated CPU version. No quantitative metrics (e.g., KL divergence between H0 posteriors, maximum parameter shifts, or bias in recovered cosmology) are reported for the full catalogue or for low-SNR edge cases, which could be affected by floating-point reductions or altered marginalization over localization volumes.
  2. [§3 (GPU Implementation)] §3 (GPU Implementation): The description of vectorization and parallel catalogue processing does not specify how the marginalization over each event's localization volume is preserved exactly under GPU reductions; any deviation here would undermine the claim that results are equivalent to the CPU version without additional validation tests.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'results demonstrate the scalability' but does not preview the specific validation metrics or systematics tests performed; adding one sentence on these would improve clarity.
  2. Figure captions for speedup benchmarks should explicitly state the hardware configuration (GPU model, CPU baseline) and event catalogue size used for the 1000x factor.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback and for recognizing the potential impact of the GPU-accelerated gwcosmo pipeline. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the validation and implementation sections.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Validation section] Validation section: The central claim of a 1000x speedup enabling O5 analyses rests on the assumption that the GPU-parallel implementation produces statistically identical posteriors to the validated CPU version. No quantitative metrics (e.g., KL divergence between H0 posteriors, maximum parameter shifts, or bias in recovered cosmology) are reported for the full catalogue or for low-SNR edge cases, which could be affected by floating-point reductions or altered marginalization over localization volumes.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics strengthen the validation. The revised manuscript now includes KL divergence between the GPU and CPU H0 posteriors for the full catalogue and for low-SNR subsets, along with maximum parameter shifts and checks for bias in recovered cosmology. These confirm statistical equivalence within numerical precision. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3 (GPU Implementation)] §3 (GPU Implementation): The description of vectorization and parallel catalogue processing does not specify how the marginalization over each event's localization volume is preserved exactly under GPU reductions; any deviation here would undermine the claim that results are equivalent to the CPU version without additional validation tests.

    Authors: We have expanded §3 to detail the marginalization procedure. The GPU implementation sums over identical localization samples as the CPU version using double-precision reductions, preserving the exact marginalization without approximation or deviation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in computational speedup claim

full rationale

The paper describes a GPU-vectorized reimplementation of the existing gwcosmo pipeline. The 1000x wall-clock speedup is obtained by parallel processing of the catalogue and is independent of any cosmological model, parameter fitting, or derivation. Validation against the prior CPU version is presented as an empirical reproduction check rather than a self-referential step. No equations, ansatzes, uniqueness theorems, or self-citations are invoked in a load-bearing way that reduces the central claim to its own inputs by construction. The result is a standard engineering improvement whose correctness can be verified externally via direct comparison of posteriors.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a computational methods improvement; no new physical parameters or axioms introduced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5698 in / 830 out tokens · 19939 ms · 2026-05-25T03:17:11.172975+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. F. Schutz, Determining the Hubble Constant from Gravitational Wave Observations, Nature323, 310 (1986). 13

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    D. E. Holz and S. A. Hughes, Using gravitational- wave standard sirens, Astrophys. J.629, 15 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0504616

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    Morescoet al., Unveiling the Universe with emerg- ing cosmological probes, Living Rev

    M. Morescoet al., Unveiling the Universe with emerg- ing cosmological probes, Living Rev. Rel.25, 6 (2022), arXiv:2201.07241 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [5]

    Exploring short gamma-ray bursts as gravitational-wave standard sirens

    S. Nissanke, D. E. Holz, S. A. Hughes, N. Dalal, and J. L. Sievers, Exploring short gamma-ray bursts as gravitational-wave standard sirens, Astrophys. J.725, 496 (2010), arXiv:0904.1017 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  5. [6]

    P.et al., A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the hubble constant, Nature551, 85–88 (2017)

    Abbott, B. P.et al., A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the hubble constant, Nature551, 85–88 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [7]

    S. R. Taylor, J. R. Gair, and I. Mandel, Cosmology us- ing advanced gravitational-wave detectors alone, Physi- cal Review D85, 10.1103/physrevd.85.023535 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.023535 2012

  7. [8]

    W. M. Farr, M. Fishbach, J. Ye, and D. E. Holz, A future percent-level measurement of the hubble expansion at redshift 0.8 with advanced ligo, The Astrophysical Jour- nal Letters883, L42 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [9]

    J. M. Ezquiaga and D. E. Holz, Jumping the Gap: Searching for LIGO’s Biggest Black Holes, Astrophys. J. Lett.909, L23 (2021), arXiv:2006.02211 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  9. [10]

    J. M. Ezquiaga and D. E. Holz, Spectral sirens: Cos- mology from the full mass distribution of compact binaries, Physical Review Letters129, 10.1103/phys- revlett.129.061102 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2022

  10. [11]

    Pierra and A

    G. Pierra and A. Papadopoulos, Heavy black-holes also matter in standard siren cosmology (2026), arXiv:2601.03257 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  11. [12]

    D. F. Chernoff and L. S. Finn, Gravitational radiation, inspiraling binaries, and cosmology, Astrophys. J. Lett. 411, L5 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9304020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  12. [13]

    Del Pozzo, Inference of cosmological parameters from gravitational waves: Applications to second generation interferometers, Phys

    W. Del Pozzo, Inference of cosmological parameters from gravitational waves: Applications to second generation interferometers, Phys. Rev. D86, 043011 (2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [14]

    Soares-Santos, M.et al., First measurement of the hub- ble constant from a dark standard siren using the dark energy survey galaxies and the ligo/virgo binary–black- hole merger gw170814, The Astrophysical Journal Let- ters876, L7 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [15]

    A. Palmeseet al., A statistical standard siren measure- ment of the hubble constant from the ligo/virgo gravita- tional wave compact object merger gw190814 and dark energy survey galaxies, The Astrophysical Journal Let- ters900, L33 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [16]

    Finke, S

    A. Finke, S. Foffa, F. Iacovelli, M. Maggiore, and M. Mancarella, Cosmology with ligo/virgo dark sirens: Hubble parameter and modified gravitational wave prop- agation, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021(08), 026

    work page 2021

  16. [17]

    Mastrogiovanni, K

    S. Mastrogiovanni, K. Leyde, C. Karathanasis, E. Chassande-Mottin, D. A. Steer, J. Gair, A. Ghosh, R. Gray, S. Mukherjee, and S. Rinaldi, On the impor- tance of source population models for gravitational-wave cosmology, Phys. Rev. D104, 062009 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [18]

    R. Gray, C. Messenger, and J. Veitch, A pixelated ap- proach to galaxy catalogue incompleteness: improving the dark siren measurement of the Hubble constant, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society512, 1127 (2022), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/512/1/1127/45303118/stac366.pdf

    work page 2022

  18. [20]

    Borghi, M

    N. Borghi, M. Mancarella, M. Moresco, M. Tagliazucchi, F. Iacovelli, A. Cimatti, and M. Maggiore, Cosmology and astrophysics with standard sirens and galaxy cat- alogs in view of future gravitational wave observations, The Astrophysical Journal964, 191 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [21]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [22]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [23]

    T. Akutsuet al., Overview of kagra: Detector de- sign and construction history, Progress of Theo- retical and Experimental Physics2021, 05A101 (2020), https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article- pdf/2021/5/05A101/37974994/ptaa125.pdf

    work page 2020

  22. [24]

    B. Abbottet al., Gwtc-1: A gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by ligo and virgo during the first and second observing runs, Physical Review X9, 10.1103/physrevx.9.031040 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031040 2019

  23. [25]

    R. Abbottet al., Gwtc-2: Compact binary coales- cences observed by ligo and virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Physical Review X11, 10.1103/physrevx.11.021053 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.021053 2021

  24. [26]

    R. Abbottet al., Gwtc-3: Compact binary coales- cences observed by ligo and virgo during the second part of the third observing run, Physical Review X13, 10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 2023

  25. [27]

    Abac, A. G.et al., Gwtc-4.0: Updating the gravitational- wave transient catalog with observations from the first part of the fourth ligo-virgo-kagra observing run (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [28]

    R. Gray, I. M. n. Hernandez, H. Qi, A. Sur, P. R. Brady, H.-Y. Chen, W. M. Farr, M. Fishbach, J. R. Gair, A. Ghosh, D. E. Holz, S. Mastrogiovanni, C. Messenger, D. A. Steer, and J. Veitch, Cosmological inference using gravitational wave standard sirens: A mock data analy- sis, Phys. Rev. D101, 122001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [29]

    R. Gray, F. Beirnaert, C. Karathanasis, B. Revenu, C. Turski, A. Chen, T. Baker, S. Vallejo, A. E. Romano, T. Ghosh, A. Ghosh, K. Leyde, S. Mastrogiovanni, and S. More, Joint cosmological and gravitational-wave pop- ulation inference using dark sirens and galaxy catalogues (2023), arXiv:2308.02281 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [30]

    Mastrogiovanni, D

    S. Mastrogiovanni, D. Laghi, R. Gray, G. C. Santoro, A. Ghosh, C. Karathanasis, K. Leyde, D. A. Steer, S. Per- ries, and G. Pierra, Joint population and cosmological properties inference with gravitational waves standard sirens and galaxy surveys, Phys. Rev. D108, 042002 (2023), arXiv:2305.10488 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [31]

    Mastrogiovanni, G

    S. Mastrogiovanni, G. Pierra, S. Perri` es, D. Laghi, G. C. Santoro, A. Ghosh, R. Gray, C. Karathanasis, and K. Leyde, Icarogw: A python package for inference of as- trophysical population properties of noisy, heterogeneous and incomplete observations (2023), arXiv:2305.17973 14 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [32]

    Tagliazucchi, M

    M. Tagliazucchi, M. Moresco, N. Borghi, and M. Fiebig, Accelerating the standard siren method: Improved con- straints on modified gravitational-wave propagation with future data, Astronomy and Astrophysics702, A244 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [33]

    Abac, A. G.et al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), GWTC-4.0: Constraints on the Cos- mic Expansion Rate and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.04348 (2025), arXiv:2509.04348 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [34]

    Mandel, W

    I. Mandel, W. M. Farr, and J. R. Gair, Ex- tracting distribution parameters from multiple un- certain observations with selection biases, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society486, 1086 (2019), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/486/1/1086/28390969/stz896.pdf

    work page 2019

  33. [35]

    Vitale, D

    S. Vitale, D. Gerosa, W. M. Farr, and S. R. Taylor, Infer- ring the properties of a population of compact binaries in presence of selection effects, inHandbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy(Springer Singapore, 2021) p. 1–60

    work page 2021

  34. [36]

    Fishbach, D

    M. Fishbach, D. E. Holz, and W. M. Farr, Does the black hole merger rate evolve with redshift?, The Astrophysical Journal Letters863, L41 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [37]

    W. M. Farr, Accuracy requirements for empirically mea- sured selection functions, Research Notes of the AAS3, 66 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [38]

    Talbot and J

    C. Talbot and J. Golomb, Growing pains: Understand- ing the impact of likelihood uncertainty on hierarchi- cal bayesian inference for gravitational-wave astronomy (2023), arXiv:2304.06138 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [39]

    PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library

    A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Brad- bury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, A. Desmaison, A. K¨ opf, E. Yang, Z. De- Vito, M. Raison, A. Tejani, S. Chilamkurthy, B. Steiner, L. Fang, J. Bai, and S. Chintala, Pytorch: An impera- tive style, high-performance deep learning library (2019), arXiv:1912.01703 [cs.LG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [40]

    Nickolls, I

    J. Nickolls, I. Buck, M. Garland, and K. Skadron, Scal- able parallel programming with cuda, Queue6, 40 (2008)

    work page 2008

  39. [41]

    S. K. Lam, A. Pitrou, and S. Seibert, Numba: A LLVM- based Python JIT Compiler, inProc. Second Workshop on the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure in HPC(2015) pp. 1–6

    work page 2015

  40. [42]

    Abbott, B. P.et al., Prospects for observing and local- izing gravitational-wave transients with advanced ligo, advanced virgo and kagra, Living Reviews in Relativity 23, 10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9 2020

  41. [43]

    Bilby: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy

    G. Ashtonet al., BILBY: A user-friendly Bayesian infer- ence library for gravitational-wave astronomy, Astrophys. J. Suppl.241, 27 (2019), arXiv:1811.02042 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [44]

    M. J. Williams, nessai: Nested sampling with artificial intelligence (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [45]

    M. J. Williams, J. Veitch, and C. Messenger, Importance nested sampling with normalising flows, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech.4, 035011 (2023), arXiv:2302.08526 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [46]

    GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries

    Abac, A. G.et al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KA- GRA Collaborations), Gwtc-4.0: Population properties of merging compact binaries (2025), arXiv:2508.18083 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [47]

    Kullback and R

    S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler, On Information and Suf- ficiency, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics22, 79 (1951)

    work page 1951

  46. [48]

    D. W. Scott,Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics (Wiley, 2009)

    work page 2009

  47. [49]

    B. W. Silverman,Density estimation for statistics and data analysis(1986)

    work page 1986

  48. [50]

    Wilcox,Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hy- pothesis Testing

    R. Wilcox,Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hy- pothesis Testing. 5th Edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press(2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [51]

    McMahon, D

    I. McMahon, D. Laghi, M. Soares-Santos, K. Ackley, G. D´ alya, Y. Gen¸ cel, D. S´ anchez-Cid, F. Andrade- Oliveira, S. MacBride, C. Chapman-Bird, R. Gray, and A. Papadopoulos, Measurement of the hubble constant using the dark energy survey year 6 gold galaxy cata- log and the fourth gravitational-wave transient catalog (2026), arXiv:2602.04766 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  50. [52]

    Abbot, R.et al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Population properties of compact ob- jects from the second ligo–virgo gravitational-wave tran- sient catalog, The Astrophysical Journal Letters913, L7 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [53]

    Madau and M

    P. Madau and M. Dickinson, Cosmic star-formation his- tory, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics52, 415–486 (2014)

    work page 2014

  52. [54]

    and others., Planck 2018 results: Vi

    Aghanim, N. and others., Planck 2018 results: Vi. cos- mological parameters, Astronomy and Astrophysics641, A6 (2020)

    work page 2018

  53. [55]

    Essicket al., Compact binary coalescence sensi- tivity estimates with injection campaigns during the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaborations’ fourth observing run, Phys

    R. Essicket al., Compact binary coalescence sensi- tivity estimates with injection campaigns during the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaborations’ fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D112, 102001 (2025), arXiv:2508.10638 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [56]

    I. M. Romero-Shaw, C. Talbot, S. Biscoveanu, V. D’Emilio, G. Ashton, C. P. L. Berry, S. Cough- lin, S. Galaudage, C. Hoy, M. H¨ ubner, K. S. Phukon, M. Pitkin, M. Rizzo, N. Sarin, R. Smith, S. Stevenson, A. Vajpeyi, M. Ar` ene, K. Athar, S. Banagiri, N. Bose, M. Carney, K. Chatziioannou, J. A. Clark, M. Colleoni, R. Cotesta, B. Edelman, H. Estell´ es, C. ...

    work page 2020

  55. [57]

    Ashton and C

    G. Ashton and C. Talbot, Bilby-mcmc: an mcmc sampler for gravitational-wave inference, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society507, 2037 (2021), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/507/2/2037/44923607/stab2236.pdf

    work page 2037

  56. [58]

    Men´ endez, J

    M. Men´ endez, J. Pardo, L. Pardo, and M. Pardo, The jensen-shannon divergence, Journal of the Franklin In- stitute334, 307 (1997)

    work page 1997

  57. [59]

    odyssee-mure.eu/(2023), accessed: 2026-05-06

    ODYSSEE-MURE, Odyssee database: Energy effi- ciency indicators and consumption trends,https://www. odyssee-mure.eu/(2023), accessed: 2026-05-06

    work page 2023