pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24378 · v1 · pith:4HXHXHHWnew · submitted 2026-05-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Light-Driven Ferroic Switching Enables Reversible Control of Hydrogen Adsorption Thermodynamics

Xueqing Wan , Zhenlong Zhang , Charles Paillard , Jian Zhou , Jinyang Ni , Chuanlu Yang , Zhijun Jiang , Laurent Bellaiche This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 13:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ferroic switchinghydrogen adsorption2D ferroelectricTiGeSe3photoinduced controladsorption thermodynamicsantiferromagnetic ordernonadiabatic dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Photoinduced ferroic switching in TiGeSe3 tunes hydrogen adsorption free energy from 0.33 to 1.11 eV

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that light-driven changes in ferroic order can reversibly alter how hydrogen binds to the surface of certain two-dimensional materials. In TiGeSe3, added carriers redistribute transition-metal 3d electrons and drive the system from its ferroelectric ground state into paraelectric phases that carry staggered or zig-zag antiferromagnetic order. This structural and magnetic evolution shifts the hydrogen adsorption free energy across a 0.78 eV window, moving the surface from near-thermoneutral binding to conditions favoring spontaneous release. Nonadiabatic calculations indicate that electron-phonon coupling assists rapid, nonthermal hydrogen desorption while carrier recombination on a picosecond scale returns the material to its starting ferroic state. The same carrier-driven mechanism is reported to operate in AgBiP2Se6 and CuInP2S6.

Core claim

In TiGeSe3, carrier-density-driven redistribution of transition-metal 3d orbital occupations triggers a sequential evolution from the ferroelectric ground state to paraelectric phases with staggered or Zig-Zag antiferromagnetic order. This switch continuously tunes the hydrogen adsorption free energy from 0.33 to 1.11 eV, shifting the interface from near-thermoneutrality to spontaneous desorption. Nonadiabatic dynamics indicate that electron-phonon coupling promotes nonthermal H release, while picosecond carrier recombination rapidly restores the initial ferroic order, closing an ultrafast reversible cycle.

What carries the argument

carrier-density-driven redistribution of transition-metal 3d orbital occupations that drives the material through ferroelectric-to-paraelectric transitions with changing antiferromagnetic order

If this is right

  • Hydrogen adsorption free energy can be tuned continuously over a 0.78 eV range by light-induced carrier changes.
  • The surface moves from near-thermoneutral binding to spontaneous desorption conditions.
  • Electron-phonon coupling enables nonthermal hydrogen release on ultrafast timescales.
  • Picosecond carrier recombination restores the starting ferroic order and closes the reversible cycle.
  • The carrier-driven mechanism also appears in AgBiP2Se6 and CuInP2S6.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Light could serve as an external knob to trigger hydrogen release in storage devices without changing temperature or pressure.
  • The same orbital-redistribution route may allow optical switching of catalytic activity for other small molecules.
  • Materials with accessible ferroic phases could be screened for similar light-tunable surface thermodynamics.

Load-bearing premise

Nonadiabatic dynamics calculations correctly capture that electron-phonon coupling drives nonthermal hydrogen release and that picosecond carrier recombination restores the original ferroic order to close the cycle.

What would settle it

Direct measurement showing that the hydrogen adsorption free energy on illuminated TiGeSe3 changes continuously from 0.33 eV to 1.11 eV as carrier density is varied, accompanied by the predicted sequence of magnetic and structural phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24378 by Charles Paillard, Chuanlu Yang, Jian Zhou, Jinyang Ni, Laurent Bellaiche, Xueqing Wan, Zhenlong Zhang, Zhijun Jiang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reversible ultrafast switching of surface thermodynamics is highly desirable for hydrogen storage and catalysis yet remains elusive at the nanoscale. Here we demonstrate that photoinduced ferroic-order switching in two-dimensional ionic ferroelectric monolayers enables rapid, reversible control of hydrogen binding. In TiGeSe$_3$, carrier-density-driven redistribution of transition-metal 3\textit{d} orbital occupations triggers a sequential evolution from the ferroelectric ground state to paraelectric phases with staggered or Zig-Zag antiferromagnetic order. This switch continuously tunes the hydrogen adsorption free energy from 0.33 to 1.11 eV, shifting the interface from near-thermoneutrality to spontaneous desorption. Nonadiabatic dynamics indicate that electron-phonon coupling promotes nonthermal H release, while picosecond carrier recombination rapidly restores the initial ferroic order, closing an ultrafast reversible cycle. Generality is further validated in AgBiP$_2$Se$_6$ and CuInP$_2$S$_6$, establishing ferroic order as an optically addressable knob for dynamic thermodynamic reconfiguration beyond static design.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that photoinduced carrier-density-driven ferroic switching in 2D monolayers such as TiGeSe3 (and analogs AgBiP2Se6, CuInP2S6) enables reversible tuning of hydrogen adsorption free energy from 0.33 to 1.11 eV via sequential transitions from ferroelectric to paraelectric antiferromagnetic phases. Nonadiabatic dynamics are reported to show electron-phonon coupling driving nonthermal H desorption on ultrafast timescales, with picosecond carrier recombination restoring the initial ferroic order to close a reversible cycle.

Significance. If the reported continuous thermodynamic tuning and closed reversible cycle hold under scrutiny, the work would establish ferroic order as an optically addressable control knob for dynamic surface thermodynamics, with potential implications for hydrogen storage and catalysis beyond static descriptor-based design. The multi-material validation adds to the generality assessment.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Dynamics section] The nonadiabatic dynamics results (abstract and implied computational sections) provide no specification of the method (surface-hopping, Ehrenfest, or TDDFT), exchange-correlation functional, k-point sampling, or supercell size. These parameters directly affect electron-phonon matrix elements and reported picosecond timescales; without them the nonthermal desorption and order-restoration claims cannot be evaluated for sensitivity to common approximations.
  2. [Abstract / Results on adsorption energies] The continuous tuning of H adsorption free energy from 0.33 to 1.11 eV is presented as a central result, yet no details are given on how the free energies were computed (e.g., zero-point corrections, entropy contributions, or coverage dependence) or on error bars from the underlying DFT calculations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the antiferromagnetic orders (staggered vs. Zig-Zag) should be defined with reference to a figure or table showing the spin configurations.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states 'generality is further validated' in two additional compounds; a brief statement of the corresponding adsorption-energy ranges or phase sequences would strengthen the claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which have improved the clarity of our work. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Dynamics section] The nonadiabatic dynamics results (abstract and implied computational sections) provide no specification of the method (surface-hopping, Ehrenfest, or TDDFT), exchange-correlation functional, k-point sampling, or supercell size. These parameters directly affect electron-phonon matrix elements and reported picosecond timescales; without them the nonthermal desorption and order-restoration claims cannot be evaluated for sensitivity to common approximations.

    Authors: We agree that these computational details are required for proper evaluation. The revised manuscript expands the Methods section to fully specify the nonadiabatic dynamics approach, functional, k-point sampling, and supercell size employed, together with a short assessment of sensitivity of the picosecond timescales to these choices. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract / Results on adsorption energies] The continuous tuning of H adsorption free energy from 0.33 to 1.11 eV is presented as a central result, yet no details are given on how the free energies were computed (e.g., zero-point corrections, entropy contributions, or coverage dependence) or on error bars from the underlying DFT calculations.

    Authors: We agree that these computational details should have been provided. The revised manuscript now includes explicit information on zero-point corrections, entropy contributions, coverage dependence, and estimated DFT error bars in both the Results and Methods sections. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe computational results on carrier-density-driven ferroic switching in TiGeSe3 (and analogs) that tunes H adsorption free energy and nonadiabatic dynamics for reversible cycling. No equations, parameter fits, self-citations, or derivation steps are quoted that reduce any claimed prediction or result to its own inputs by construction. The central claims are presented as outputs of simulations rather than self-definitional or fitted-input renamings, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained derivation with no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no extractable free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full manuscript would be required to populate the ledger.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5737 in / 1029 out tokens · 24269 ms · 2026-06-30T13:38:28.874936+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references

  1. [1]

    X. Xu, Y . Dong, Q. Hu, N. Si, and C. Zhang, Energy & Fuels 38, 7579 (2024) . 11

    2024

  2. [2]

    Hassan, S

    A. Hassan, S. Z. Ilyas, A. Jalil, and Z. Ullah, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 21204 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    C. R. K. J and M. A. Majid, Energy Sustain Soc 10, 1 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Y adav, A

    S. Y adav, A. S. Oberoi, and M. K. Mittal, Int. J. Energy Res. 46, 16316 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Eftekhari and B

    A. Eftekhari and B. Fang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 25143 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    J. Zhou, Q. Wang, Q. Sun, P . Jena, and X. Chen, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 2801 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    W. Liu, Y . Zhao, J. Nguyen, Y . Li, Q. Jiang, and E. Lavernia, Carbon 47, 3452 (2009)

    2009

  8. [8]

    Y . Han, Y . Ni, X. Guo, and T. Jiao, Fuel 357, 129655 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Zhang, H

    F. Zhang, H. Zhang, S. Krylyuk, C. A. Milligan, Y . Zhu, D. Y . Zemlyanov, L. A. Bendersky, B. P . Burton, A. V . Davydov, and J. Appenzeller, Nat. Mater. 18, 55 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    M. Y . Zhang, Z. X. Wang, Y . N. Li, L. Y . Shi, D. Wu, T. Lin, S. J. Zhang, Y . Q. Liu, Q. M. Liu, J. Wang, T. Dong, and N. L. Wang, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021036 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    Z. Wang, X. Li, G. Zhang, Y . Luo, and J. Jiang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 23309 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    J. Ma, R. Y ang, and H. Chen, Nat. Commun. 12, 2314 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    X. Lin, G. Bridoux, A. Gourgout, G. Seyfarth, S. Krämer, M. Nardone, B. Fauqué, and K. Behnia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 207002 (2014)

    2014

  14. [14]

    B. Peng, G. F. Lange, D. Bennett, K. Wang, R. J. Slager, and B. Monserrat, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 116601 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Cazorla, S

    C. Cazorla, S. Bichelmaier, C. Escorihuela Sayalero, J. Íñiguez, J. Carrete, and R. Rurali, Nanoscale 16, 8335 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    A. J. Sternbach, F. L. Ruta, Y . Shi, T. Slusar, J. Schalch, G. Duan, A. S. McLeod, X. Zhang, M. Liu, A. J. Millis, H.-T. Kim, L.-Q. Chen, R. D. Averitt, and D. N. Basov, Nano Lett. 21, 9052 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    A. S. Johnson, D. P . Salinas, K. M. Siddiqui, S. Kim, S. Choi, K. Volckaert, P . E. Majchrzak, S. Ulstrup, N. Agarwal, K. Hallman, R. F. H. Jr, C. M. Günther, B. Pfau, S. Eisebitt, D. Backes, F. Maccherozzi, A. Fitzpatrick, S. S. Dhesi, P . Gargiani, M. Valvidares, N. Artrith, F. de Groot, H. Choi, D. Jang, A. Katoch, S. Kwon, S. H. Park, H. Kim, and S. ...

    2023

  18. [18]

    Lüchtefeld, H

    J. Lüchtefeld, H. Hemmelmann, S. Wachs, C. Behling, K. J. Mayrhofer, M. T. Elm, and B. B. Berkes, J. Phys. Chem. C 127, 21211 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    L. Xue, Q. Zhang, X. Zhu, L. Gu, J. Yue, Q. Xia, T. Xing, T. Chen, Y . Y ao, and H. Xia, Nano Energy 56, 463 (2019)

    2019

  20. [20]

    M. L. Brongersma, N. J. Halas, and P . Nordlander, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 25 (2015)

    2015

  21. [21]

    Sándor, B

    P . Sándor, B. Lovász, J. Budai, Z. Pápa, and P . Dombi, Nano Lett. 24, 8024 (2024). 12

    2024

  22. [22]

    Avdizhiyan, W

    A. Avdizhiyan, W. Janus, M. Szpytma, T. Slezak, M. Przybylski, M. Chrobak, V . Roddatis, A. Stu- pakiewicz, and I. Razdolski, Nano Lett. 24, 466 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Bakalis, S

    J. Bakalis, S. Chernov, Z. Li, A. Kunin, Z. H. Withers, S. Cheng, A. Adler, P . Zhao, C. Corder, M. G. White, G. Schönhense, X. DuRol, K. Kawakami, and T. K. Allison, Nano Lett. 24, 9353 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    S. Shen, H. Lu, S. Gumber, O. V . Prezhdo, and R. Long, Nano Lett. 25, 7517 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Wang and S

    Z. Wang and S. Dong, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2305197120 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Zhang, B

    J.-J. Zhang, B. I. Y akobson, and S. Dong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 216801 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Paillard, E

    C. Paillard, E. Torun, L. Wirtz, J. Íñiguez, and L. Bellaiche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 087601 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    Paillard and L

    C. Paillard and L. Bellaiche, Phys. Rev. B 107, 054107 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Zheng, W

    Q. Zheng, W. A. Saidi, Y . Xie, Z. Lan, O. V . Prezhdo, H. Petek, and J. Zhao, Nano. lett. 17, 6435 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    Zheng, W

    Q. Zheng, W. Chu, C. Zhao, L. Zhang, H. Guo, Y . Wang, X. Jiang, and J. Zhao, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.:Comput. Mol. Sci. 9, e1411 (2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    W. Chu, Q. Zheng, O. V . Prezhdo, J. Zhao, and W. A. Saidi, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaw7453 (2020)

    2020

  32. [32]

    Y ang, X

    Z. Y ang, X. Wang, Y . Chen, Z. Zheng, Z. Chen, W. Xu, W. Liu, Y . Y ang, J. Zhao, T. Chen, and H. Zhu, Nat. Commun. 10, 4540 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  34. [34]

    W. Y ao, D. Li, S. Wei, X. Liu, X. Liu, and W. Wang, ACS omega 7, 36479 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    R. Sun, C. L. Y ang, M. S. Wang, and X. G. Ma, J. Power Sources 547, 232008 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    M. Ge, C. L. Y ang, M. S. Wang, and X. G. Ma, Colloids Surf., A 666, 131286 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    C. A. Gueymard, D. Myers, and K. Emery, Solar energy 73, 443 (2002)

    2002

  38. [38]

    C. F. Fu, J. Sun, Q. Luo, X. Li, W. Hu, and J. Y ang, Nano Lett. 18, 6312 (2018)

    2018

  39. [39]

    Wan, C.-L

    X.-Q. Wan, C.-L. Y ang, M.-S. Wang, and X.-G. Ma, Appl. Surf. Sci. 614, 156254 (2023)

    2023

  40. [40]

    X. Zhu, X. Tan, K. H. Wu, S. C. Haw, C. W. Pao, B. J. Su, J. Jiang, S. C. Smith, J. M. Chen, R. Amal, and X. Lu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 60, 21911 (2021)

    2021

  41. [41]

    S. Jiao, X. Fu, and H. Huang, Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2107651 (2022)

    2022

  42. [42]

    J. K. Nørskov, F. Abild-Pedersen, F. Studt, and T. Bligaard, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 937 (2011)

    2011

  43. [43]

    Zhang, W

    J. Zhang, W. Li, J. Wang, X. Pu, G. Zhang, S. Wang, N. Wang, and X. Li, Angew. Chem. 135, e202215654 (2023)

    2023

  44. [44]

    Zhang, K

    W. Zhang, K. Li, B. Wang, Y . Sun, J. Zhou, and Z. Sun, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 16, 4698 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    H. Yu, H. Irie, and K. Hashimoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 6898 (2010). 13

    2010

  46. [46]

    H. Irie, Y . Maruyama, and K. Hashimoto, J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 1847 (2007)

    2007

  47. [47]

    Sabatier,La catalyse en chimie organique , Encyclopédie de Science Chimique Appliquée aux Arts Industriels (C

    P . Sabatier,La catalyse en chimie organique , Encyclopédie de Science Chimique Appliquée aux Arts Industriels (C. Béranger, Paris, 1920)

    1920

  48. [48]

    Z. W. Chen, J. Li, P . Ou, J. E. Huang, Z. Wen, L. Chen, X. Y ao, G. Cai, C. C. Y ang, C. V . Singh, and Q. Jiang, Nat. Commun. 15, 359 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    M. G. Kim, S. Kang, B. C. Wood, and E. S. Cho, J. Mater. Chem. A 12, 27212 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    S. Liu, Y . Zhang, F. Zhu, J. Liu, X. Wan, R. Liu, X. Liu, J. Shang, R. Yu, Q. Feng, W. Zili, and S. Jianglan, Adv. Sci. 11, 2401868 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Z.-Z. Sun, W. Xun, L. Jiang, J.-L. Zhong, and Y .-Z. Wu, J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys. 52, 465302 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    J. Qi, H. Wang, X. Chen, and X. Qian, Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 043102 (2018)

    2018

  53. [53]

    H. Liu, S. Yu, Y . Wang, B. Huang, Y . Dai, and W. Wei, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 1972 (2022)

    1972

  54. [54]

    Y . Fan, X. Song, H. Ai, W. Li, and M. Zhao, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 34486 (2021)

    2021

  55. [55]

    L. Ju, J. Shang, X. Tang, and L. Kou, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 1492 (2019)

    2019

  56. [56]

    B. Xu, H. Xiang, Y . Xia, K. Jiang, X. Wan, J. He, J. Yin, and Z. Liu, Nanoscale 9, 8427 (2017)

    2017

  57. [57]

    B. Lin, A. Chaturvedi, J. Di, L. Y ou, C. Lai, R. Duan, J. Zhou, B. Xu, Z. Chen, P . Song, J. Peng, B. Ma, H. Liu, P . Meng, G. Y ang, H. Zhang, Z. Liu, and F. Liu, Nano Energy 76, 104972 (2020)

    2020

  58. [58]

    P . Yu, F. Wang, J. Meng, T. A. Shifa, M. G. Sendeku, J. Fang, S. Li, Z. Cheng, X. Lou, and J. He, CrystEngComm 23, 591 (2021)

    2021

  59. [59]

    Chiang, C.-C

    C.-H. Chiang, C.-C. Lin, Y .-C. Lin, C.- Y . Huang, C.-H. Lin, Y .-J. Chen, T.-R. Ko, H.-L. Wu, W.- Y . Tzeng, S.-Z. Ho, Y .-C. Chen, C.-H. Ho, C.-J. Y ang, Z.-W . Cyue, C.-L. Dong, C.-W . Luo, C.-C. Chen, and C.-W . Chen,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 23278 (2024)

    2024

  60. [60]

    D. N. Denzler, C. Frischkorn, C. Hess, M. Wolf, and G. Ertl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 226102 (2003)

    2003

  61. [61]

    Füchsel, J

    G. Füchsel, J. C. Tremblay, T. Klamroth, P . Saalfrank, and C. Frischkorn,Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 098303 (2012)

    2012

  62. [62]

    Long and O

    R. Long and O. V . Prezhdo, Nano Lett. 16, 1996 (2016)

    1996

  63. [63]

    H. M. Jaeger, S. Fischer, and O. V . Prezhdo, J. Chem. Phys. 137, 22A545 (2012)

    2012

  64. [64]

    Wan, C.-L

    X.-Q. Wan, C.-L. Y ang, X.-H. Li, Y .-L. Liu, and W.-K. Zhao, J. Mater. Chem. A 12, 16559 (2024)

    2024

  65. [65]

    Wan, C.-L

    X.-Q. Wan, C.-L. Y ang, W.-J. Shi, X. Li, Y . Liu, W. Zhao, and F. Gao, Small 22, 2504146 (2025)

    2025

  66. [66]

    Parkar and A

    P . Parkar and A. Chaudhari, Mater. Chem. Phys. 319, 129340 (2024)

    2024

  67. [67]

    Verma and N

    R. Verma and N. Jaggi, Diamond Relat. Mater. 148, 111470 (2024). 14

    2024

  68. [68]

    W. Qiao, D. Yin, S. Zhao, N. Ding, L. Liang, C. Wang, L. Wang, M. He, and Y . Cheng, Chem. Eng. J. 465, 142837 (2023)

    2023

  69. [69]

    Y . Gao, P . Gao, C. Li, Q. Yue, Q. Liang, S. Qiao, W. Zhang, W. Zheng, L. Zhang, Z. Li, W.-G. Cui, X. Wang, Y . Wan, M. Zhang, X. Wang, Y . Liu, F. Qi, C. Li, J. Miao, J. Zhang, X. Han, P . Wang, C. Guo, Q. Chen, Z. Xu, M. Gao, W. Sun, Y . Y ang, J. Chen, Z. Xia, and H. Pan,Adv. Funct. Mater.35, e05188 (2025)

    2025

  70. [70]

    Seif and K

    A. Seif and K. Azizi, RSC Adv. 6, 58458 (2016)

    2016

  71. [71]

    Z. Shi, K. Nie, Z. J. Shao, B. Gao, H. Lin, H. Zhang, B. Liu, Y . Wang, Y . Zhang, X. Sun, P . Cao, Xiaoming Hu, Q. Gao, and Y . Tang, Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1262 (2017)

    2017

  72. [72]

    X. Xia, G. Zhao, Q. Y an, B. Wang, Q. Wang, and H. Xie,ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 10, 182 (2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    Baaddi, R

    M. Baaddi, R. Chami, O. Baalla, S. E. Quaoubi, A. Saadi, L. E. H. Omari, and M. Chafi, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 31, 62056 (2024)

    2024

  74. [74]

    B. Li, Y . Wu, N. Li, X. Chen, X. Zeng, Arramel, X. Zhao, and J. Jiang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 9261 (2020)

    2020

  75. [75]

    up” and “dn

    W. Zhou, D. Zhu, Z. Tang, C. Wu, L. Huang, Z. Ma, and Y . Chen, J. Power Sources 343, 11 (2017) . 15 FIG. 1. Illustration of the underlying mechanism for photo-controlled hydrogen storage in the ionic ferro- electric of TiGeSe 3 monolayer. The left panel illustrates carrier separation driven by the intrinsic electric field in the FE phase without light. I...

    2017