pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24654 · v3 · pith:OG6F6TKVnew · submitted 2026-05-23 · 🪐 quant-ph

Influence of quantum decoherence on the survival of quantumness in neutrino oscillations

Jilali Loulijat , Abdallah Slaoui , Mohamed Gouighri , Berihu Teklu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 12:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords neutrino oscillationsquantum decoherencequantum discordentanglement of formationlocal quantum uncertaintydephasing channeltwo-flavor mixingcoherence loss
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum correlation measures in two-flavor neutrino oscillations respond directly to off-diagonal coherence loss under dephasing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps two-flavor neutrino oscillations to an effective two-qubit system and tracks three quantum correlation measures under a dephasing channel using parameters from the KamLAND, MINOS, and Daya Bay experiments. Without decoherence the measures oscillate with amplitudes set by the relevant mixing angles, largest for near-maximal theta_23. Dephasing damps the off-diagonal terms so that all three quantities fall, yet quantum discord stays nonzero in regimes where entanglement has already vanished. The resulting description therefore registers coherence loss more directly than ordinary flavor probabilities do.

Core claim

Within the effective two-qubit description, a dephasing channel suppresses off-diagonal coherence and thereby reduces entanglement of formation, quantum discord, and local quantum uncertainty; quantum discord remains a broader witness that survives where entanglement is already weak, while for pure states local quantum uncertainty equals the square of concurrence and therefore tracks entanglement monotonically.

What carries the argument

Effective two-qubit mapping of neutrino flavor states together with the dephasing channel that damps off-diagonal coherence terms while leaving diagonal populations unchanged.

If this is right

  • In the unitary regime all three measures oscillate with amplitudes controlled by the mixing angle, largest for MINOS parameters.
  • Under dephasing the quantifiers decrease monotonically with increasing decoherence strength.
  • Quantum discord remains positive in parameter regions where entanglement of formation has dropped to zero.
  • Local quantum uncertainty equals concurrence squared for pure states and therefore follows entanglement exactly.
  • The measures exhibit quantifiable sensitivity to both oscillation parameters and the decoherence rate.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same observables could be extracted from long-baseline or reactor data to place bounds on environmental decoherence strength.
  • Extension to the three-flavor case would introduce additional cross terms whose survival under dephasing could distinguish mass-ordering scenarios.
  • Comparison with amplitude-damping or depolarizing channels would test whether the observed damping is specifically dephasing-like.

Load-bearing premise

The effective two-qubit mapping together with the chosen dephasing channel accurately captures the dominant decoherence physics of real neutrino propagation without significant contributions from other environmental channels or higher-dimensional effects.

What would settle it

Measurement of neutrino oscillation data in which the extracted quantum discord or entanglement values fail to decrease when the estimated decoherence strength is increased, or fail to follow the predicted dependence on the experimental mixing angles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24654 by Abdallah Slaoui, Berihu Teklu, Jilali Loulijat, Mohamed Gouighri.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Plots of Local Quantum Uncertainty, Quantum Discord, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Baseline dependence of the entanglement of formation un [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Baseline dependence of quantum discord [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Baseline dependence of LQU [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This study examines the dynamics of quantumness in two-flavor neutrino oscillations subjected to a dephasing channel, using representative oscillation parameters associated with the KamLAND, MINOS, and Daya Bay experiments. We analyze three complementary quantum-correlation measures -- entanglement of formation (EOF), quantum discord (QD), and local quantum uncertainty (LQU) -- within an effective two-qubit description. In the unitary case, all three measures display oscillatory behavior controlled by flavor mixing, and their amplitudes are strongly shaped by the relevant mixing angle. MINOS exhibits the largest correlations because $\theta_{23}$ is close to maximal, KamLAND shows intermediate values associated with the solar sector, and Daya Bay yields smaller correlations due to the relatively small value of $\theta_{13}$. Under dephasing, the off-diagonal coherence terms are suppressed and the three quantifiers decrease accordingly, while QD remains non-zero in regimes where entanglement is weak. For pure states, LQU satisfies $\mathcal{U}=\mathcal{C}^2$ and therefore tracks entanglement monotonically, whereas QD provides a broader witness of non-classical correlations. These results provide a compact quantum-information description of two-flavor neutrino oscillations in both coherent and dephased regimes. We also quantify the sensitivity of these observables to oscillation and decoherence parameters, showing that their main added value relative to flavor probabilities is their direct response to off-diagonal coherence loss.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the dynamics of quantum correlations in two-flavor neutrino oscillations under a dephasing channel, employing an effective two-qubit mapping and representative parameters from the KamLAND, MINOS, and Daya Bay experiments. It computes entanglement of formation (EOF), quantum discord (QD), and local quantum uncertainty (LQU), reporting oscillatory behavior in the unitary regime (with amplitudes set by the mixing angles) that is suppressed by dephasing while QD remains nonzero in regimes of weak entanglement; the central added value claimed is the direct sensitivity of these measures to off-diagonal coherence loss relative to flavor probabilities.

Significance. If the effective model is accepted on its own terms, the work supplies a compact quantum-information characterization of coherence loss in neutrino oscillations. The ordering of correlation strengths across the three experiments follows directly from the known mixing angles, and the persistence of QD under dephasing is a standard feature of the chosen quantifiers once the density matrix is written in the flavor basis. The study does not claim that dephasing dominates real propagation, limiting its immediate phenomenological reach but preserving internal consistency as a model investigation.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction refer to 'representative oscillation parameters' for the three experiments but do not list the numerical values of Δm^{2} and heta used in the plots; adding an explicit table or reference to the precise inputs would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Methods] Section describing the dephasing channel (presumably §3) should state the explicit Kraus operators or Lindblad form employed, together with the range of the single free parameter (dephasing strength) scanned in the figures.
  3. [Results] The statement that 'LQU satisfies U = C^{2} for pure states' is correct by definition but would benefit from a one-line reminder of the relevant formula (e.g., Eq. (X)) to avoid any ambiguity for readers unfamiliar with the LQU literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. No specific major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper constructs an effective two-qubit density matrix from externally tabulated oscillation parameters (KamLAND, MINOS, Daya Bay) and applies standard textbook quantifiers EOF, QD and LQU under a chosen dephasing channel. The claimed sensitivity of these measures to off-diagonal coherence loss follows immediately from their definitions once the flavor-basis matrix is written; no parameter is fitted to the reported results, no uniqueness theorem is invoked via self-citation, and the model study makes no claim that the chosen channel is the dominant physical mechanism. All load-bearing steps remain independent of the paper's own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the two-qubit approximation for neutrinos and the modeling choice of a pure dephasing channel; oscillation parameters are taken from prior literature rather than fitted here.

free parameters (1)
  • dephasing strength
    Parameter varied to illustrate sensitivity to coherence loss; its concrete values are not stated in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Neutrino flavor oscillations admit an effective two-qubit description
    Required to apply entanglement, discord, and local uncertainty measures.
  • domain assumption A Markovian dephasing channel adequately represents environmental decoherence for the oscillation lengths considered
    Central modeling choice that suppresses off-diagonal terms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5790 in / 1514 out tokens · 37076 ms · 2026-06-30T12:53:40.723893+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Information as a New Lens for Precision Neutrino Physics

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Concurrence minima in neutrino oscillations identify low-entanglement energy regions that, when aligned with NOνA and T2K data, yield tighter joint constraints on sin²θ₂₃, δ_CP, and Δm²₃₁.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    for∆m 2 32 andθ 23 constraints via acceleratorν µ dis- appearance. Each experiment probes distinct aspects of the oscillation parameter space, enabling a comprehensive quan- tum information-theoretic analysis across complementary energy and baseline regimes [4, 6]. The KamLAND experiment, an intermediate-distance an- tineutrino disappearance study, analyz...

    2000

  2. [2]

    Pontecorvo,Mesonium and anti-mesonium, Sov

    B. Pontecorvo,Mesonium and anti-mesonium, Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 429 (1957)

    1957

  3. [3]

    Pontecorvo,Inverse beta processes and nonconservation of lepton charge, Sov

    B. Pontecorvo,Inverse beta processes and nonconservation of lepton charge, Sov. Phys. JETP7, 172 (1958)

    1958

  4. [4]

    Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, S. Sakata,Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles, Prog. Theor. Phys.28, 870 (1962)

    1962

  5. [5]

    S. M. Bilenky,Introduction to the Physics of Massive and Mixed Neutrinos, Springer (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    Tanabashiet al.(Particle Data Group),Review of Particle Physics, Phys

    M. Tanabashiet al.(Particle Data Group),Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D98, 030001 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Giunti, C

    C. Giunti, C. W. Kim,Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, Oxford University Press (2007)

    2007

  8. [8]

    Q. R. Ahmadet al.(SNO Collaboration),Direct Evidence for Neutrino Flavor Transformation from Neutral-Current Interac- tions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 011301 (2002)

    2002

  9. [9]

    B. T. Clevelandet al.,Measurement of the Solar Neutrino Flux with the Homestake Chlorine Detector, Astrophys. J.496, 505 (1998)

    1998

  10. [10]

    Fukudaet al.(Super-Kamiokande Collaboration),Evidence for Oscillation of Atmospheric Neutrinos, Phys

    Y . Fukudaet al.(Super-Kamiokande Collaboration),Evidence for Oscillation of Atmospheric Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 1562 (1998)

    1998

  11. [11]

    Eguchiet al.(KamLAND Collaboration),First results from KamLAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance, Phys

    K. Eguchiet al.(KamLAND Collaboration),First results from KamLAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 021802 (2003)

    2003

  12. [12]

    Adamsonet al.(MINOS Collaboration),Measurement of Neutrino Oscillations with the MINOS Detectors in the NuMI Beam, Phys

    P. Adamsonet al.(MINOS Collaboration),Measurement of Neutrino Oscillations with the MINOS Detectors in the NuMI Beam, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 131802 (2008)

    2008

  13. [13]

    Abeet al.(T2K Collaboration),Observation of Electron Neutrino Appearance in a Muon Neutrino Beam, Phys

    K. Abeet al.(T2K Collaboration),Observation of Electron Neutrino Appearance in a Muon Neutrino Beam, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 041801 (2011)

    2011

  14. [14]

    Einstein, B

    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen,Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev.47, 777 (1935)

    1935

  15. [15]

    J. S. Bell,On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Physics1, 195 (1964)

    1964

  16. [16]

    Ollivier, W

    H. Ollivier, W. H. Zurek,Quantum discord: A measure of the quantumness of correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 017901 (2001)

    2001

  17. [17]

    Henderson, V

    L. Henderson, V . Vedral,Classical, quantum and total correla- tions, J. Phys. A34, 6899 (2001)

    2001

  18. [18]

    Giorda and M

    P. Giorda and M. G. A. Paris,Gaussian quantum discord, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 020503 (2010)

    2010

  19. [19]

    K. Modi, A. Brodutch, H. Cable, T. Paterek, V . Vedral,The classical-quantum boundary for correlations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1655 (2012)

    2012

  20. [20]

    Girolami, T

    D. Girolami, T. Tufarelli, G. Adesso,Characterizing nonclassi- cal correlations via local quantum uncertainty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 240402 (2013)

    2013

  21. [21]

    C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Woot- ters,Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. A54, 3824–3851 (1996)

    1996

  22. [22]

    W. K. Wootters,Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary Mixed State of Two Qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 2245 (1998)

    1998

  23. [23]

    M. B. Plenio and S. Virmani,An introduction to entanglement measures, Quantum Inf. Comput.7, 1–51 (2007)

    2007

  24. [24]

    Blasone, F

    M. Blasone, F. Dell’Anno, S. De Siena, F. Illuminati,Entan- glement in neutrino oscillations, EPL85, 50002 (2009)

    2009

  25. [25]

    Banerjee, A

    S. Banerjee, A. K. Alok, R. MacKenzie,Quantum correlations in neutrino oscillations in curved spacetime, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130, 164 (2015)

    2015

  26. [26]

    A. K. Alok, S. Banerjee, and S. Uma Sankar,Quantum correla- tions in terms of neutrino oscillation probabilities, Nucl. Phys. B909, 65–72 (2016)

    2016

  27. [27]

    Dixit, J

    K. Dixit, J. Naikoo, S. Banerjee, and A. K. Alok,Quantum correlations and the neutrino mass degeneracy problem, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 914 (2018)

    2018

  28. [28]

    Blasone, A

    M. Blasone, A. Capolupo, C.-R. Ji, and G. Vitiello,Neutrino Mixing and Oscillations in Quantum Field Theory, Int. J. Mod. 16 Phys. A23, 4845 (2008)

    2008

  29. [29]

    Blasone, F

    M. Blasone, F. Dell’Anno, S. De Siena, F. Illuminati,Multi- partite entangled states in particle mixing, Phys. Rev. D83, 093018 (2011)

    2011

  30. [30]

    Blennow, E

    M. Blennow, E. Fern ´andez-Mart´ınez, and J. Men´endez,Entan- glement of neutrino states in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D82, 093002 (2010)

    2010

  31. [31]

    Wang,Quantum Discord in Neutrino Oscillations, Phys

    X. Wang,Quantum Discord in Neutrino Oscillations, Phys. Rev. D93, 053003 (2016)

    2016

  32. [32]

    Gandoet al.(KamLAND),Reactor On-Off Antineutrino Measurement with KamLAND, Phys

    A. Gandoet al.(KamLAND),Reactor On-Off Antineutrino Measurement with KamLAND, Phys. Rev. D88, 033001 (2013)

    2013

  33. [33]

    Estebanet al.,The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP09, 178 (2020)

    I. Estebanet al.,The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP09, 178 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    Abeet al.(KamLAND),Precision measurement of neu- trino oscillation parameters with KamLAND, JHEP2021, 035 (2021)

    S. Abeet al.(KamLAND),Precision measurement of neu- trino oscillation parameters with KamLAND, JHEP2021, 035 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    Abeet al.(KamLAND Collaboration),Precision Mea- surement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters with KamLAND, Phys

    S. Abeet al.(KamLAND Collaboration),Precision Mea- surement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters with KamLAND, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 221803 (2008)

    2008

  36. [36]

    J. K. de Jonget al.(MINOS Collaboration),Near-to-Final MI- NOS Oscillation Results, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.237, 166– 169 (2013)

    2013

  37. [37]

    Adamsonet al.(MINOS),Measurement of Neutrino Oscilla- tions with the MINOS Detectors in the NuMI Beam, Phys

    P. Adamsonet al.(MINOS),Measurement of Neutrino Oscilla- tions with the MINOS Detectors in the NuMI Beam, Phys. Rev. D73, 072002 (2006)

    2006

  38. [38]

    Adamsonet al.(MINOS+),Combined Analysis ofν µ Disap- pearance andν µ →ν e Appearance in MINOS Using Acceler- ator and Atmospheric Neutrinos, Phys

    P. Adamsonet al.(MINOS+),Combined Analysis ofν µ Disap- pearance andν µ →ν e Appearance in MINOS Using Acceler- ator and Atmospheric Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 251801 (2013)

    2013

  39. [39]

    Anet al.(Daya Bay),Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay, Phys

    J. Anet al.(Daya Bay),Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 171803 (2012)

    2012

  40. [40]

    F. P. Anet al.(Daya Bay),Measurement of electron antineu- trino oscillation based on 1230 days of operation at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 241805 (2018)

    2018

  41. [41]

    F. P. Anet al.(Daya Bay Collaboration),Improved Measure- ment of the Reactor Antineutrino Flux and Spectrum at Daya Bay, Chin. Phys. C41, 013002 (2017)

    2017

  42. [42]

    D. M. Webberet al.(Daya Bay Collaboration),An improved measurement of electron antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.233, 96–101 (2012)

    2012

  43. [43]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press (2010)

    2010

  44. [44]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems, Oxford University Press (2002)

    2002

  45. [45]

    Naimy, A

    A. Naimy, A. Slaoui, A. Ali, H. El Hadfi, R. A. Laamara, and S. Al-Kuwari,Dynamic evolution of quantum Fisher and skew information under decoherence in three-qubit X-states, Phys. Lett. A547, 130536 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Dakir, A

    Y . Dakir, A. Slaoui, A. B. A. Mohamedet al.,Quantum tele- portation and dynamics of quantum coherence and metrologi- cal non-classical correlations for open two-qubit systems, Sci. Rep.13, 20526 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone,Advances in quan- tum metrology, Nature Photonics5, 222–229 (2011)

    2011

  48. [48]

    Pezz `e, A

    L. Pezz `e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein,Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035005 (2018)

    2018

  49. [49]

    El Bouzaidi, A

    K. El Bouzaidi, A. Slaoui, L. B. Drissi, E. H. Saidi, and R. A. Laamara,Dynamics of quantum information resources in two- flavor neutrino oscillations, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1349 (2025), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15083-z

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15083-z 2025

  50. [50]

    Quantum Estimation Theory Limits in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments,

    C. Frugiuele, M. G. Genoni, M. Ignoti, and M. G. A. Paris, “Quantum Estimation Theory Limits in Neutrino Oscillation Experiments,” arXiv:2602.16534 [hep-ph] (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    El Bakraoui, A

    M. El Bakraoui, A. Slaoui, H. El Hadfi, and M. Daoud,En- hancing the estimation precision of an unknown phase shift in multipartite Glauber coherent states via skew information cor- relations and local quantum Fisher information, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B39, 1297–1306 (2022)

    2022

  52. [52]

    Capozziet al.,Status of three-neutrino oscillation parame- ters, Nucl

    F. Capozziet al.,Status of three-neutrino oscillation parame- ters, Nucl. Phys. B908, 218–234 (2016)

    2016

  53. [53]

    Guoet al.,Precision Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation at Kilometer-Scale Baselines, Phys

    X. Guoet al.,Precision Measurement of Reactor Antineutrino Oscillation at Kilometer-Scale Baselines, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 111801 (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    Ahmedet al.,Experimental Constraints onν e Disappear- ance with Low-Energy Neutrinos, J

    S. Ahmedet al.,Experimental Constraints onν e Disappear- ance with Low-Energy Neutrinos, J. High Energy Phys.2015, 030 (2015)

    2015

  55. [55]

    Blasone, F

    M. Blasone, F. Dell’Anno, S. De Siena, and F. Illuminati,En- tanglement in Neutrino Oscillations, EPL106, 30002 (2014)

    2014

  56. [56]

    M. Ali, A. R. P. Rau, and G. Alber,Quantum Discord for Two- Qubit X States, Phys. Rev. A81, 042105 (2010)

    2010

  57. [57]

    C. Z. Wang, C. X. Li, L. Y . Nie, and J. F. Li,Classical Correla- tion and Quantum Discord Mediated by Cavity in Two Coupled Qubits, Phys. Rev. A90, 032323 (2014)

    2014

  58. [58]

    Luo,Quantum Discord for Two-Qubit Systems, Phys

    S. Luo,Quantum Discord for Two-Qubit Systems, Phys. Rev. A77, 042303 (2008)

    2008

  59. [59]

    Daki ´c, V

    B. Daki ´c, V . Vedral, andˇC. Brukner,Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Nonzero Quantum Discord, Nat. Phys.6, 666– 669 (2010)

    2010

  60. [60]

    E. P. Wigner, M. M. Yanase,On the Structure of the Quantum Mechanical Density Matrix, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.49, 910 (1963)

    1963

  61. [61]

    W. H. Zurek,Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum ori- gins of the classical, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 715–775 (2003)

    2003

  62. [62]

    F. M. Paula, I. A. Silva, J. D. Montealegre, T. R. de Oliveira, and M. S. Sarandy,Geometric Local Quantum Uncertainty, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 250401 (2013)

    2013

  63. [63]

    Alicki and M

    R. Alicki and M. Fannes,Quantum Correlations in the Multi- Partite Setting, Quantum Inf. Comput.8, 208–218 (2008)

    2008

  64. [64]

    Adesso, T

    G. Adesso, T. R. Bromley, and M. Cianciaruso,Measures and applications of quantum correlations, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 473001 (2016)

    2016

  65. [65]

    Lloyd,Measures of the quantumness of correlations, Phys

    S. Lloyd,Measures of the quantumness of correlations, Phys. Rev. A55, 1613 (1997)

    1997

  66. [66]

    Devetak and P

    I. Devetak and P. W. Shor,Classical and quantum information theoretic measures of correlations, Commun. Math. Phys.256, 287–303 (2005)

    2005

  67. [67]

    Slaoui, B

    A. Slaoui, B. Amghar, and R. Ahl Laamara,Interferomet- ric phase estimation and quantum resource dynamics in Bell coherent-state superpositions generated via a unitary beam splitter, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B40, 2013–2027 (2023)

    2013

  68. [68]

    J. P. Paz and W. H. Zurek,Quantum discord and quantum de- coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 5181 (1999)

    1999

  69. [69]

    Joos and H

    E. Joos and H. D. Zeh,The emergence of classical properties from quantum systems, Z. Phys. B59, 223–243 (1985)

    1985

  70. [70]

    Gaidiet al.,Effects of DM and KSEA interactions on entan- glement, Fisher and Wigner–Yanase information correlations of two XYZ-Heisenberg-qubit states under a magnetic field, Phys

    S. Gaidiet al.,Effects of DM and KSEA interactions on entan- glement, Fisher and Wigner–Yanase information correlations of two XYZ-Heisenberg-qubit states under a magnetic field, Phys. Scr.99, 115115 (2024)

    2024

  71. [71]

    F. N. Loreti and A. B. Balantekin,Neutrino oscillations in noisy media, Phys. Rev. D50, 4762 (1994)

    1994

  72. [72]

    C. P. Burgess and D. Michaud,Neutrino propagation in a fluc- tuating sun, Annals Phys.256, 1 (1997)

    1997

  73. [73]

    Benatti and R

    F. Benatti and R. Floreanini,Dissipative neutrino oscillations in randomly fluctuating matter, Phys. Rev. D71, 013003 (2005)

    2005

  74. [74]

    Lichkunov, K

    A. Lichkunov, K. Stankevich, and A. Studenikin,Neutrino 17 quantum decoherence in a fluctuating ALPs field, Phys. Rev. D112, 123007 (2025)

    2025

  75. [75]

    Dvornikov,Interaction of supernova neutrinos with stochas- tic gravitational waves, Phys

    M. Dvornikov,Interaction of supernova neutrinos with stochas- tic gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D104, 043018 (2021)

    2021

  76. [76]

    J. F. Nieves and S. Sahu,Neutrino decoherence in an electron and nucleon background, Phys. Rev. D102, 056007 (2020)

    2020

  77. [77]

    J. F. Nieves and S. Sahu,Neutrino decoherence in a fermion and scalar background, Phys. Rev. D100, 115049 (2019)

    2019

  78. [78]

    Stankevich, A

    K. Stankevich, A. Studenikin, and M. Vyalkov,Generalized Lindblad master equation for neutrino evolution, Phys. Rev. D 111, 036014 (2025)

    2025

  79. [79]

    Stankevich and A

    K. Stankevich and A. Studenikin,Neutrino quantum decoher- ence engendered by neutrino radiative decay, Phys. Rev. D101, 056004 (2020)

    2020

  80. [80]

    Balieiro Gomes, M

    G. Balieiro Gomes, M. M. Guzzo, P. C. de Holanda, and R. L. N. Oliveira,Parameter limits for neutrino oscillation with decoherence in KamLAND, Phys. Rev. D95, 113005 (2017)

    2017

Showing first 80 references.