pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24676 · v1 · pith:CGSBV4PZnew · submitted 2026-05-23 · ⚛️ nucl-th

A unified classification-quantification framework for bubble-like nuclei within the extended quantum molecular dynamics model

Ge Ren , Chun-Wang Ma , Xi-Guang Cao , Kai-Xuan Cheng , Jie Pu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 12:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords bubble nucleinuclear classificationradial density profileinflection pointscentral depletiontoroidal nucleiEQMD modelsuperheavy nuclei
0
0 comments X

The pith

A BHTU parameter set classifies all known nuclei as droplets, bubbles, or toroidal bubbles from their density profiles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a systematic way to label nuclear shapes using four dimensionless numbers derived from how the density changes with radius in simulations of all nuclides in the AME2020 database. It sorts nuclei by counting inflection points to decide if they are simple droplets, have a central bubble, or more complex toroidal bubbles. Additional numbers measure how empty the center is, how thick the surface is, and how big the hollow part is. This matters because it gives a consistent map of which nuclei might have unusual hollow centers, pointing to specific ones for experiments to check.

Core claim

Within the extended quantum molecular dynamics model, a unified framework using the dimensionless parameters BHTU characterizes bubble-like nuclear morphologies. B is determined from the number of inflection points in the radial density profile to categorize nuclei as droplet (B=0), bubble (B=1), or toroidal bubble (B=2). H quantifies central density depletion, T the relative surface thickness, and U the relative size of the internal low-density region. Light nuclei show droplet-like features, medium-mass nuclei often exhibit bubbles especially near calcium-40, and toroidal bubbles appear in heavier systems with bubble structures common in superheavy nuclei.

What carries the argument

The BHTU parameters, with B set by the count of inflection points in the radial density profile from EQMD calculations, and H, T, U measuring depletion, thickness, and hollow size respectively. This machinery assigns morphological labels to nuclei based on their relaxed density distributions.

If this is right

  • Light nuclei are classified as droplet-like with B=0, H=0, T=1, U=0.
  • Most medium-mass nuclei have B=1, with pronounced central hollowing near 40Ca and in neutron-rich regions.
  • Toroidal bubble nuclei (B=2) emerge for Z around 25 and are prevalent in heavy systems.
  • Bubble structures are widespread in the superheavy region.
  • The parameter scheme establishes a predictive framework for exploring exotic nuclear shapes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The classification could be applied to other nuclear models to check consistency across different theoretical approaches.
  • Experimental probes like electron scattering on the identified bubble candidates could confirm or refute the predicted central depletions.
  • In superheavy elements, the presence of bubble structures might affect calculated binding energies or decay modes.
  • This scheme opens the possibility of searching for toroidal shapes in intermediate mass nuclei.

Load-bearing premise

The density profiles generated by the EQMD model with frictional cooling match the actual ground-state densities of nuclei closely enough for inflection points to define real morphological categories.

What would settle it

Measuring the charge density distribution of a medium-mass nucleus predicted to be a bubble (B=1) and finding it lacks a central density minimum would contradict the framework's assignments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24676 by Chun-Wang Ma, Ge Ren, Jie Pu, Kai-Xuan Cheng, Xi-Guang Cao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (Color online) The difference in binding energy per n [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (Color online) The total (black), proton (red) and ne [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Color online) Three types of nuclides with differen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (Color online) The centroids of nucleon wave packets [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Color online) The H-factor for nuclides quantifies the de￾gree of central hollowing in each nuclide. A higher H-factor in￾dicates a greater reduction ratio in central density compared to the surrounding density. the liquid surface and relative size of the low-density region. For bubble and toroidal bubble configurations, the dimen￾sionless parameters T and U are defined as T =    Rrms − r 1/2 1 R… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Color online) The U-factor for nuclides represents the rel￾ative size of the bubble region. A higher U-factor indicates a larger proportion of bubble radius in the bubble and toroidal bubble nuclei. Since both T and U are dimensionless quantities and are computed in a similar manner, Figs. 6 and 7 employ the same numerical range and color map. The colors in the figures al￾low clear differentiation of the … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A systematic study of relaxed low-energy cluster configurations for all nuclides listed in the AME2020 database is performed within the extended quantum molecular dynamics (EQMD) framework, with frictional cooling enabling stable relaxation. A unified classification-quantification framework based on the dimensionless parameters $BHTU$ is established to characterize bubble-like nuclear morphologies. The factor $B$, determined from the number of inflection points in the radial density profile, categorizes nuclei into droplet ($B=0$), bubble ($B=1$), and toroidal bubble ($B=2$). The parameter $H$ defines the degree of central density depletion, while $T$ and $U$ characterize the relative surface thickness and the relative size of the internal low-density region, respectively. Light nuclei are predominantly droplet-like with $B=0$, $H=0$, $T=1$, $U=0$. Most medium-mass nuclei have $B=1$, consistent with previous studies, especially in the vicinity of $^{40}$Ca and the neutron-rich region, where nuclei show a pronounced central hollowing with large $H$ and $U$ values, identifying them as prime candidates for experimental searches for bubble structures. Toroidal bubble nuclei ($B=2$), emerging for $Z\approx25$ and prevalent in heavy systems, display a local density minimum at intermediate radius together with a shell-like low-density region. Furthermore, bubble structures are found to be widespread in the superheavy region, in agreement with earlier studies. This parameter scheme not only reveals the morphological richness of nuclei but also establishes a predictive framework for exploring exotic nuclear shapes, thereby opening new avenues for future theoretical and experimental investigations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs a systematic EQMD simulation with frictional cooling to obtain relaxed low-energy configurations for all nuclides in the AME2020 database. It introduces a unified BHTU classification-quantification framework in which B is defined as the number of inflection points in the spherically averaged radial density profile (B=0 droplet, B=1 bubble, B=2 toroidal bubble), H quantifies the degree of central density depletion, T the relative surface thickness, and U the relative size of the internal low-density region. The study reports that light nuclei are predominantly droplet-like (B=0, H=0, T=1, U=0), most medium-mass nuclei exhibit B=1 (especially near 40Ca and in neutron-rich regions with large H and U), toroidal bubbles (B=2) emerge for Z≈25 and become prevalent in heavy systems, and bubble structures are widespread in the superheavy region, consistent with selected prior results.

Significance. If the EQMD radial densities are sufficiently faithful to physical ground-state densities, the BHTU scheme supplies a compact, dimensionless language for classifying and quantifying bubble-like nuclear morphologies over the entire chart of nuclides, with concrete candidate lists for experimental searches. The exhaustive coverage of AME2020 and the introduction of parameters that permit quantitative inter-nucleus comparison constitute clear strengths. The work could usefully guide future model comparisons and experimental proposals on exotic shapes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and radial-density analysis] The central claim that B (and downstream H, T, U) furnishes physically meaningful morphological labels rests on the assumption that the number of inflection points in the EQMD radial density profile is a robust indicator. No benchmark of these profiles against ab initio calculations, DFT densities, or experimental charge radii is presented even for a single test case such as 40Ca (abstract and results sections). This validation gap is load-bearing for the interpretation of the entire BHTU framework.
  2. [Results on medium-mass nuclei] The statement that B=1 classifications are “consistent with previous studies, especially in the vicinity of 40Ca and the neutron-rich region” is made without a quantitative overlap table, confusion matrix, or direct comparison of H/U values to earlier classifications (results section). The absence of such metrics prevents assessment of how much the new scheme reproduces or extends prior work.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Explicit functional definitions or equations for H, T, and U (beyond the verbal descriptions in the abstract) should be supplied in the methods section to allow independent reproduction.
  2. [Density-profile construction] The manuscript should state whether the spherical averaging used to obtain the radial density is applied uniformly or only after confirming near-spherical symmetry; any deformation handling should be clarified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity and support for the BHTU framework.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and radial-density analysis] The central claim that B (and downstream H, T, U) furnishes physically meaningful morphological labels rests on the assumption that the number of inflection points in the EQMD radial density profile is a robust indicator. No benchmark of these profiles against ab initio calculations, DFT densities, or experimental charge radii is presented even for a single test case such as 40Ca (abstract and results sections). This validation gap is load-bearing for the interpretation of the entire BHTU framework.

    Authors: The BHTU scheme is introduced as an intrinsic classification tool operating on EQMD-generated radial density profiles to enable systematic, dimensionless quantification across the full AME2020 chart. We agree that explicit benchmarks against ab initio or DFT densities for cases such as 40Ca would strengthen claims of broader physical relevance. The manuscript does not contain such direct comparisons. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph in the methods or results section that references existing EQMD validations from the literature for bulk properties and notes the model-specific character of the BHTU labels, while clarifying that the framework's primary value is consistent intra-model comparison rather than direct experimental mapping. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results on medium-mass nuclei] The statement that B=1 classifications are “consistent with previous studies, especially in the vicinity of 40Ca and the neutron-rich region” is made without a quantitative overlap table, confusion matrix, or direct comparison of H/U values to earlier classifications (results section). The absence of such metrics prevents assessment of how much the new scheme reproduces or extends prior work.

    Authors: We accept that the consistency statement would be more robust with quantitative metrics. The original phrasing reflected a qualitative assessment of overlap with known bubble candidates reported in the literature. The revised manuscript will include a new table in the results section that lists representative B=1 nuclei (near 40Ca and selected neutron-rich cases), their computed H and U values, and the corresponding classifications or central-depletion indicators from selected prior studies. This will allow readers to evaluate the degree of reproduction and the quantitative extensions provided by the BHTU parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; classification is direct post-processing of model densities

full rationale

The paper computes radial density profiles via EQMD + frictional cooling, then defines B explicitly as the number of inflection points in that profile and H/T/U as direct functions of the same profile (central depletion, surface thickness, internal low-density size). No equation or step reduces an output quantity to a fitted input or to a prior self-citation; the BHTU scheme is a definitional mapping applied to the simulation results. Consistency statements with earlier studies are not load-bearing for the framework itself. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that EQMD plus frictional cooling produces usable radial density profiles and on the definitional choices that turn inflection-point counts into the B label and density ratios into H, T, and U; no new physical entities are postulated and no numerical constants are fitted inside the classification itself.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The extended quantum molecular dynamics model with frictional cooling yields stable, physically representative radial density profiles for all nuclides in AME2020.
    The entire classification pipeline begins from these simulated profiles; the abstract states that frictional cooling enables stable relaxation but does not demonstrate convergence or accuracy against experiment.
  • ad hoc to paper The number of inflection points in a radial density profile is a sufficient and unambiguous indicator of morphological class (droplet, bubble, toroidal bubble).
    This rule is introduced in the abstract as the definition of B; it is a modeling choice rather than a theorem derived from nuclear forces.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5848 in / 1628 out tokens · 36394 ms · 2026-06-30T12:04:18.705767+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ˙Ri = 0 ˙Pi = 0 ˙λ i = 0 ˙δi = 0 (8) Applying the Wigner transform to Eq

    is satisfied. ˙Ri = 0 ˙Pi = 0 ˙λ i = 0 ˙δi = 0 (8) Applying the Wigner transform to Eq. ( 2), the phase space distribution function is obtained as f (r, p) = 1 (2π ℏ)3/ 4 ∫ exp ( ipξ ℏ ) φ i ( r− ) φ ∗ i ( r+) dξ = 1 (π ℏ)3 exp [ − 1 + λ 2 i δ2 i λ i (r − Ri)2 ] × exp [ − λ i ℏ2 (p − Pi)2 ] × exp [ 2λ iδi ℏ (r − Ri) ·(p − Pi) ] , (9) where r± = r ± ξ 2 (ξ ...

  2. [2]

    Y . Ye, X. Yang, H. Sakurai,et al., Physics of exotic nuclei. Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 21–37 (2025). doi: 10.1038/s42254-024-00782-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00782-5 2025

  3. [3]

    Ma, L.-N

    S.-B. Ma, L.-N. Sheng, X.-H. Zhang, et al ., Opportunities for production and property research of neutron-rich nucle i around N = 126 at HIAF. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 97 (2024). doi: 10.1007/s41365-024-01454-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01454-w 2024

  4. [4]

    Kondo, N

    Y . Kondo, N. L. Achouri, H. Al Falou, et al ., First observation of 28O. Nature 620, 965 (2023). doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06352-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06352-6 2023

  5. [5]

    Fang, X.-Z

    D.-Q. Fang, X.-Z. Cai, H.-W. Wang, et al ., Preface to spe- cial issue: dedicated to Professor Wenqing Shen in honor of his 80th birthday. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 210 (2024). 9 doi: 10.1007/s41365-024-01592-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01592-1 2024

  6. [6]

    J. H. Chen, X. Dong, X. H. He, et al., Properties of the QCD matter: review of selected results from the relativistic he avy ion collider beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 214 (2024). doi: 10.1007/s41365-024-01591-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01591-2 2024

  7. [7]

    Pu, K.-J

    J. Pu, K.-J. Sun, C.-W. Ma, et al ., Probing the inter- nal structures of pΩ and ΩΩ with their production at the Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C 110, 024908 (2024). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.110.024908

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.024908 2024

  8. [8]

    Liao, X.-G

    Z.-L. Liao, X.-G. Cao, Y .-X. Yang, et al ., Design and con- struction of charged-particle telescope array for study of exotic nuclear clustering structure. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 134 (2024). doi: 10.1007/s41365-024-01503-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01503-4 2024

  9. [9]

    D.-W. Si, S. Xiao, Z. Qi, et al ., Extracting Neutron- Neutron Interaction Strength and Spatiotemporal Dynam- ics of Neutron Emission from the Two-Particle Corre- lation Function. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 222301 (2025). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.222301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.222301 2025

  10. [10]

    P . J. Li, D. Beaumel, J. Lee, et al ., V alidation of the 10Be Ground-State Molecular Structure Using 10Be(p, pα )6He Triple Differential Reaction Cross- Section Measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 212501 (2023). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.212501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.212501 2023

  11. [11]

    Cao, D.-Y

    Y .-Y . Cao, D.-Y . Tao, B. Zhou, et al ., Hoyle-analog state in 13N. Phys. Rev. C 112, 034313 (2025). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.112.034313

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.112.034313 2025

  12. [12]

    K. H. Li, J. G. Li, N. Michel, et al ., Gamow shell model for dynamic Thomas-Ehrman shift in 16Ne/16C and 18Mg/18C. Phys. Rev. C 111, 014302 (2025). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.111.014302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.111.014302 2025

  13. [13]

    Wu, J.-Z

    X.-Y . Wu, J.-Z. Cao, K.-N. Zhao, et al., Static or dynamic pear shapes in radioactive nucleus 224Rn? Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 202 (2024). doi: 10.1007/s41365-024-01578-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01578-z 2024

  14. [14]

    M. T. Wan, L. Ou, M. Liu, N. Wang, Properties of the drip-l ine nucleus and mass relation of mirror nuclei. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 26 (2025). doi: 10.1007/s41365-024-01633-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01633-9 2025

  15. [15]

    L.-Y . Shen, Q. Y uan, H.-H. Li, et al., Study of shell evolution in neutron-rich boron, carbon, and nitrogen isotopes with i n- medium similarity renormalization group calculations. Nu cl. Sci. Tech. 36, 220 (2025). doi: 10.1007/s41365-025-01796-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-025-01796-z 2025

  16. [16]

    Dey, S.-S

    B. Dey, S.-S. Wang, D. Pandit, et al., Exotic nuclear shape due to cluster formation at high angular momentum. Phys. Rev. C 102, 031301 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.031301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.031301 2020

  17. [17]

    Ichikawa, J

    T. Ichikawa, J. A. Maruhn, N. Itagaki, et al ., Exis- tence of an Exotic Torus Configuration in High-Spin Ex- cited States of 40Ca. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 232503 (2012). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.232503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.232503 2012

  18. [18]

    Tanihata, T

    I. Tanihata, T. Kobayashi, T. Suzuki, et al ., Determi- nation of the density distribution and the correlation of halo neutrons in 11Li. Phys. Lett. B 287, 307 (1992). doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(92)90988-G

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90988-g 1992

  19. [19]

    Tanihata, H

    I. Tanihata, H. Savajols, R. Kanungo, Recent experimen tal progress in nuclear halo structure studies. Prog. Part. Nuc l. Phys. 68, 215–313 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.07.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.07.001 2013

  20. [20]

    Abrahamyan, Z

    S. Abrahamyan, Z. Ahmed, H. Albataineh, et al ., Measure- ment of the Neutron Radius of 208Pb through Parity Violation in Electron Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 112502 (2012). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.112502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.112502 2012

  21. [21]

    Adhikari, H

    D. Adhikari, H. Albataineh, D. Androic, et al ., Pre- cision Determination of the Neutral Weak Form Fac- tor of 48Ca. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 042501 (2022). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.042501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.042501 2022

  22. [22]

    Ma, Y .-J

    C.-W. Ma, Y .-J. Duan, Y .-F. Guo, et al ., A possible probe to neutron-skin thickness by fragment parallel momentum dist ri- bution in projectile fragmentation reactions. Nucl. Sci. T ech. 35, 99 (2024). doi: 10.1007/s41365-024-01455-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01455-9 2024

  23. [23]

    Y . Liu, Y . L. Ye, J. L. Lou, et al., Positive-Parity Linear-Chain Molecular Band in 16C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 192501 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.192501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.192501 2020

  24. [24]

    J. Han, Y . Ye, J. Lou, et al ., Nuclear linear-chain struc- ture arises in carbon-14. Commun. Phys. 6, 220 (2023). doi: 10.1038/s42005-023-01342-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-023-01342-6 2023

  25. [25]

    C. Y . Wong, Toroidal nuclei. Phys. Lett. B 41, 446 (1972). doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(72)90671-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(72)90671-5 1972

  26. [26]

    X. G. Cao, et al ., Examination of evidence for resonances at high excitation energy in the 7α disassembly of 28Si. Phys. Rev. C 99, 014606 (2019). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.014606

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.014606 2019

  27. [27]

    Y . Z. Wang, J. Z. Gu, X. Z. Zhang, J. M. Dong, Tensor effect s on the proton sd states in neutron-rich Ca isotopes and bub- ble structure of exotic nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 84, 044333 (2011). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.044333

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.84.044333 2011

  28. [28]

    J. J. Li, W. H. Long, J. L. Song, et al ., Pseudospin- orbit splitting and its consequences for the central depres - sion in nuclear density. Phys. Rev. C 93, 054312 (2016). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054312

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.054312 2016

  29. [29]

    H. A. Wilson, A Spherical Shell Nuclear Model. Phys. Rev . 69, 538 (1946). doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.69.538

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.69.538 1946

  30. [30]

    Grasso, E

    M. Grasso, E. Khan, J. Margueron, et al ., Bubbles in exotic nuclei. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 18, 2009 (2009). doi: 10.1142/S0218301309014184

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218301309014184 2009

  31. [31]

    X. Y . Wu, J. M. Yao, Z. P . Li, et al., Low-energy structure and anti-bubble effect of dynamical correlations in 46Ar. Phys. Rev. C 89, 017304 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.017304

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.89.017304 2014

  32. [32]

    Choudhary, W

    V . Choudhary, W. Horiuchi, M. Kimura, R. Chatterjee, Imprint of a nuclear bubble in nucleon-nucleus diffraction. Phys. R ev. C 102, 034619 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.034619

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.034619 2020

  33. [33]

    Bender, K

    M. Bender, K. Rutz, P .-G. Reinhard, et al ., Shell structure of superheavy nuclei in self-consistent mean-field models. Ph ys. Rev. C 60, 034304 (1999). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.60.034304

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.60.034304 1999

  34. [34]

    Dechargé, J.-F

    J. Dechargé, J.-F. Berger, M. Girod, K. Dietrich, Bubbl es and semi-bubbles as a new kind of superheavy nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A 716, 55 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01398-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(02)01398-2 2003

  35. [35]

    Mutschler, et al ., A proton density bubble in the dou- bly magic 34Si nucleus

    A. Mutschler, et al ., A proton density bubble in the dou- bly magic 34Si nucleus. Nat. Phys. 13, 152–156 (2017). doi: 10.1038/nphys3916

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3916 2017

  36. [36]

    E. Khan, M. Grasso, J. Margueron, et al ., Detecting bub- bles in exotic nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A 800, 37 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.11.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.11.012 2008

  37. [37]

    J. M. Yao, H. Mei, Z. P . Li, et al ., Does a proton “bubble” structure exist in the low-lying states of 34Si? Phys. Lett. B 723, 459 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.05.049

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.05.049 2013

  38. [38]

    J. Chen, B. P . Kay, C. R. Hoffman, et al ., Evolution of the nuclear spin-orbit splitting explored via the 32Si(d,p)33Si re- action using SOLARIS. Phys. Lett. B 853, 138678 (2024). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138678

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138678 2024

  39. [39]

    Saxena, M

    G. Saxena, M. Kumawat, M. Kaushik, et al ., Bubble structure in magic nuclei. Phys. Lett. B 788, 1 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.08.076

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.08.076 2019

  40. [40]

    Ren, C.-W

    G. Ren, C.-W. Ma, X.-G. Cao, Y .-G. Ma, Bubble 36Ar and Its New Breathing Modes. Phys. Lett. B 857, 138990 (2024). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138990

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138990 2024

  41. [41]

    J. B. Natowitz, Extended quantum molecular dynamics mo del predicts new breathing modes in 36Ar bubble nuclei. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 187 (2024). doi: 10.1007/s41365-024-01581-4 10

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01581-4 2024

  42. [42]

    bub- ble

    M. Grasso, L. Gaudefroy, E. Khan, et al ., Nuclear “bub- ble” structure in 34Si. Phys. Rev. C 79, 034318 (2009). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.034318

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.034318 2009

  43. [43]

    Fan, G.-C

    X.-H. Fan, G.-C. Y ong, W. Zuo, Probing nuclear bubble config- urations by proton-induced reactions. Phys. Rev. C 99, 041601 (2019). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.041601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.041601 2019

  44. [44]

    Campi, D

    X. Campi, D. W. L. Sprung, Possible bubble nuclei 36Ar and 200Hg. Phys. Lett. B 46, 291–295 (1973). doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(73)90121-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(73)90121-4 1973

  45. [45]

    Schuetrumpf, W

    B. Schuetrumpf, W. Nazarewicz, P .-G. Reinhard, et al., Central depression in nucleonic densities: Trend analysis in the nu clear density functional theory approach. Phys. Rev. C 96, 024306 (2017). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.024306

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.024306 2017

  46. [46]

    Ebran, E

    J.-P . Ebran, E. Khan, T. Nikši ´c, et al., How atomic nuclei clus- ter. Nature 487, 341–344 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nature11246

    work page doi:10.1038/nature11246 2012

  47. [47]

    B. Zhou, Y . Funaki, H. Horiuchi, et al ., Nonlocal- ized Clustering: A New Concept in Nuclear Cluster Structure Physics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 262501 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.262501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.262501 2013

  48. [48]

    Wei, Y .-L

    K. Wei, Y .-L. Ye, Z.-H. Yang, Clustering in nuclei: progress and perspectives. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 216 (2024). doi: 10.1007/s41365-024-01588-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01588-x 2024

  49. [49]

    Xu, X.-G

    F.-L. Xu, X.-G. Cao, Y .-G. Ma, Two-body cluster entangl ed structure in the H1 ⊗ H 2 Hilbert space. Phys. Rev. C 113, 014313 (2026). doi: 10.1103/wc1r-8l74

    work page doi:10.1103/wc1r-8l74 2026

  50. [50]

    W. B. He, Y . G. Ma, X. G. Cao, et al ., Giant dipole resonance as a fingerprint of α clustering configurations in 12C and 16O. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 032506 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.032506

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.032506 2014

  51. [51]

    Maruyama, K

    T. Maruyama, K. Niita, A. Iwamoto, Extension of quantum molecular dynamics and its application to heavy-ion collis ions. Phys. Rev. C 53, 297 (1996). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.53.297

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.53.297 1996

  52. [52]

    Y . K. Gupta, V . B. Katariya, G. K. Prajapati, et al ., Precise determination of quadrupole and hexadecapole deformation parameters of the sd-shell nucleus, 28Si. Phys. Lett. B 845, 138120 (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138120

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138120 2023

  53. [53]

    Ma, Multi-proton emission at the limits of nuclea r stabil- ity: challenges for extreme open quantum systems

    Y .-G. Ma, Multi-proton emission at the limits of nuclea r stabil- ity: challenges for extreme open quantum systems. Nucl. Sci . Tech. 36, 236 (2025). doi: 10.1007/s41365-025-01831-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-025-01831-z 2025

  54. [54]

    Zhou, D.-Q

    L. Zhou, D.-Q. Fang, S.-M. Wang, et al ., Structure and 2p decay mechanism of 18Mg. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 107 (2024). doi: 10.1007/s41365-024-01479-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01479-1 2024

  55. [55]

    Du, C.-W

    X.-Q. Du, C.-W. Wang, D.-Y . Tao, et al., Dineutron and dipro- ton correlations in the exotic nuclei 6He and 6Be. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 205 (2025). doi: 10.1007/s41365-025-01778-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-025-01778-1 2025

  56. [56]

    D.-Y . Tao, B. Zhou, Y .-G. Ma, 3α correlations of ground and excited 0+ states of 12C within the microscopic cluster model. Phys. Rev. C 112, 044324 (2025). doi: 10.1103/rbgt-tf98

    work page doi:10.1103/rbgt-tf98 2025