pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25214 · v1 · pith:44V3VPD3new · submitted 2026-05-24 · 🧬 q-bio.NC

A Quantum-Analogue Formalism for Modeling Supraliminal Information Processing

Vasily Lubashevskiy , Ihor Lubashevsky This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 23:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.NC
keywords cloud functionsupraliminal processingchange of mindneural field theorydecision makingquantum analoguesensory information processingpost-decisional accumulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A cloud-function formalism models changes of mind as the result of fast preconscious sensory processing competing with slower conscious comparison.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a cloud-function formalism that links the spatial properties of perceived objects to the dynamics of large-scale neural activity in the brain. The function evolves according to an equation that combines features of neural field models with a structure resembling a nonlinear non-Hermitian Schrödinger equation plus Lotka-Volterra terms. This setup is used to explain how an initial decision can be revised during execution through the interaction of rapid sensory processing and deliberate evaluation of alternatives. The approach aligns with observations of ongoing evidence accumulation after a choice is made. A reader would care because it supplies a single dynamical object that carries both the geometry of the external world and the intrinsic rules of neural patterns into the account of decision revision.

Core claim

The cloud function is defined so that its spatial structure inherits properties of the perceived physical object while its time evolution is governed by regularities of large-scale neural activity. Its governing equation takes the form of a Schrödinger-type equation with a nonlinear non-Hermitian Hamiltonian supplemented by Lotka-Volterra terms. Applied to decision making, changes of mind arise from the interplay between fast preconscious sensory processing and slower conscious comparison of alternatives, consistent with continuous post-decisional evidence accumulation. The model also requires incorporation of cloud-function self-interaction.

What carries the argument

The cloud function, a mathematical object whose spatial form mirrors the perceived object and whose temporal dynamics follow a neural-field equation interpreted as a nonlinear non-Hermitian Schrödinger equation with Lotka-Volterra terms.

If this is right

  • An initial motor or perceptual commitment can be altered in mid-execution once slower conscious comparison overtakes the fast sensory stream.
  • The model predicts that post-decisional evidence accumulation continues because the cloud function continues to evolve after the first choice is registered.
  • Self-interaction terms in the cloud function are required to prevent the dynamics from collapsing into a single fixed pattern.
  • The same formalism can be applied to any supraliminal process in which first-person spatial structure must be carried by neural activity patterns.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The formalism could be extended to predict the statistics of revision times across different sensory modalities by varying the relative strengths of the fast and slow components.
  • If the cloud function is treated as an explicit state variable, it might be used to design brain-computer interfaces that detect impending changes of mind before they appear in overt behavior.
  • The approach suggests a route for embedding environmental geometry directly into neural-field simulations without first mapping the geometry onto an abstract feature space.

Load-bearing premise

The governing equation for the cloud function can be obtained from a neural-field model that uses polynomial nonlinearities and assumes global phase-shift invariance of neural-pattern oscillations.

What would settle it

A neurophysiological recording that shows decision revisions occurring without measurable continuous post-decisional evidence accumulation, or whose timing cannot be reproduced by the competition between fast preconscious and slow conscious components in the cloud-function dynamics, would falsify the account.

read the original abstract

We develop a novel cloud-function formalism describing the dynamical relationship between sensory-information processing in large-scale brain networks (supraliminal processing) and the content of the mental representation of an observed object. The formalism combines elements of neural field theory for large-scale neural activity with the spatial characteristics of perceived objects and their embedding in the environment from the first-person perspective. The cloud function is characterized by two key features: (i) its spatial structure inherits properties of the perceived physical object, and (ii) its temporal evolution is governed by regularities reflecting intrinsic properties of large-scale neural activity. The governing equation for the cloud function is based on a neural-field model with polynomial nonlinearities and global phase-shift invariance of neural-pattern oscillations. Its structure may be interpreted as a Schrodinger-type equation with a nonlinear non-Hermitian Hamiltonian supplemented by terms analogous to those of the Lotka-Volterra model. The proposed approach is applied to the change-of-mind phenomenon in decision-making, in which an initial choice may be revised during its execution. Changes of mind are explained as arising from the interplay between fast preconscious sensory processing and slower conscious comparison of alternatives, consistent with neurophysiological evidence for continuous post-decisional evidence accumulation. The necessity of incorporating cloud-function self-interaction is also discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a 'cloud-function' formalism that merges neural-field models of large-scale brain activity with the spatial structure of perceived objects from a first-person perspective. The governing equation is presented as interpretable as a nonlinear non-Hermitian Schrödinger equation supplemented by Lotka-Volterra terms; this formalism is then used to account for change-of-mind phenomena in decision making as the result of fast preconscious sensory processing interacting with slower conscious comparison, consistent with post-decisional evidence accumulation.

Significance. If the claimed dynamical properties can be rigorously derived and shown to produce the required separation of timescales, the approach would supply a mathematically explicit bridge between neural-field theory and cognitive revision phenomena, offering a falsifiable framework that could be tested against existing neurophysiological data on post-decisional accumulation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Governing equation description] Governing-equation section (abstract and main text): the statement that the cloud-function equation 'may be interpreted as' a nonlinear non-Hermitian Schrödinger equation with Lotka-Volterra terms is given without an explicit derivation from the underlying neural-field model with polynomial nonlinearities and phase-shift invariance, nor any solution analysis demonstrating the fast preconscious versus slow conscious timescale separation required for the change-of-mind claim.
  2. [Application to decision-making] Application to change-of-mind (abstract and relevant section): the explanation that changes of mind arise from the interplay of fast preconscious and slower conscious processes rests on an interpretive step; no parameter regimes, explicit solutions, or numerical demonstrations are supplied that generate continuous post-decisional evidence accumulation or the possibility of revision under the stated equation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'Schrodinger' should be spelled 'Schrödinger'.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from explicit citation of standard neural-field theory references (e.g., Amari, Wilson-Cowan) when introducing the polynomial nonlinearities and phase-shift invariance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which highlight important areas for strengthening the presentation of the cloud-function formalism and its application. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Governing equation description] Governing-equation section (abstract and main text): the statement that the cloud-function equation 'may be interpreted as' a nonlinear non-Hermitian Schrödinger equation with Lotka-Volterra terms is given without an explicit derivation from the underlying neural-field model with polynomial nonlinearities and phase-shift invariance, nor any solution analysis demonstrating the fast preconscious versus slow conscious timescale separation required for the change-of-mind claim.

    Authors: The governing equation is constructed from the neural-field model with polynomial nonlinearities and global phase-shift invariance, which yields the indicated Schrödinger-type structure with non-Hermitian and Lotka-Volterra terms by direct substitution and rearrangement. We agree that the manuscript would benefit from an explicit step-by-step derivation rather than relying on the interpretive phrasing. We will add this derivation (including the origin of the non-Hermitian character and the Lotka-Volterra analogy) in a dedicated subsection or appendix. We will also include a brief analysis of the resulting dynamical regimes that separates the fast preconscious and slow conscious timescales via the model's intrinsic parameters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Application to decision-making] Application to change-of-mind (abstract and relevant section): the explanation that changes of mind arise from the interplay of fast preconscious and slower conscious processes rests on an interpretive step; no parameter regimes, explicit solutions, or numerical demonstrations are supplied that generate continuous post-decisional evidence accumulation or the possibility of revision under the stated equation.

    Authors: The change-of-mind account follows from the model's separation into fast sensory-driven evolution and slower comparison dynamics, which permits ongoing evidence accumulation after an initial decision. We acknowledge that the current version presents this at the level of structural interpretation without explicit parameter values or numerical illustrations. In the revision we will supply concrete parameter regimes together with numerical solutions (or reduced analytic approximations) that demonstrate continuous post-decisional accumulation and the conditions under which revision occurs. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is interpretive rather than self-referential

full rationale

The paper posits a cloud-function formalism whose governing equation is taken from an existing neural-field model (polynomial nonlinearities and phase-shift invariance) and reinterpreted as a nonlinear non-Hermitian Schrödinger equation plus Lotka-Volterra terms. The application to change-of-mind is presented as a qualitative consistency argument linking fast preconscious and slower conscious processing to post-decisional accumulation. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that would make any claimed prediction or timescale separation reduce by construction to the model's inputs. The central step is an interpretive mapping rather than a closed derivation loop, leaving the formalism self-contained against external neural-field benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review is limited to the abstract; ledger entries are inferred from stated modeling choices rather than explicit equations or proofs.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Neural field theory supplies the correct description of large-scale neural activity patterns
    Invoked as the foundation for the temporal evolution of the cloud function
  • domain assumption Global phase-shift invariance holds for neural-pattern oscillations
    Used to constrain the form of the governing equation
invented entities (1)
  • cloud function no independent evidence
    purpose: To encode both the spatial structure of a perceived object and the temporal dynamics of supraliminal neural processing
    New mathematical object introduced to link sensory information processing to mental representation

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5764 in / 1316 out tokens · 26909 ms · 2026-06-29T23:15:21.093985+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Academic Press, London, UK (2024)

    Northoff, G.: From Brain Dynamics to the Mind: Spatiotemporal Neuroscience. Academic Press, London, UK (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    Physics of Life Reviews52, 29–43 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2024.11.012

    Northoff, G., Buccellato, A., Zilio, F.: Connecting brain and mind through temporo-spatial dynamics: Towards a theory of common currency. Physics of Life Reviews52, 29–43 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2024.11.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2024.11.012 2025

  3. [3]

    Neuroscience & Biobe- havioral Reviews173, 106139 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025

    Northoff, G., Ventura, B.: Bridging the gap of brain and experience – Converging Neurophenomenology with Spatiotemporal Neuroscience. Neuroscience & Biobe- havioral Reviews173, 106139 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025. 106139

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025 2025

  4. [4]

    Behavioural Brain Research 424, 113788 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113788

    Northoff, G., Zilio, F.: Temporo-spatial theory of consciousness (TTC) – bridging the gap of neuronal activity and phenomenal states. Behavioural Brain Research 424, 113788 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113788

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113788 2022

  5. [5]

    Open Science Framework, PsyArXiv preprint (b6gx3 v1) (2024) https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b6gx3

    Lutz, A., Abdoun, O., Dor-Ziderman, Y., Trautwein, F.-M., Berkovich-Ohana, 19 A.: An overview of neurophenomenological approaches to meditation and their relevance to clinical research. Open Science Framework, PsyArXiv preprint (b6gx3 v1) (2024) https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b6gx3

    work page doi:10.31234/osf.io/b6gx3 2024

  6. [6]

    Cognitive Psychology1(1), 1–17 (1970) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0010-0285(70)90002-2

    Shepard, R.N., Chipman, S.: Second-order isomorphism of internal representa- tions: Shapes of states. Cognitive Psychology1(1), 1–17 (1970) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0010-0285(70)90002-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-0285(70)90002-2 1970

  7. [7]

    Behav- ioral and Brain Sciences21(4), 449–467 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0140525x98001253

    Edelman, S.: Representation is representation of similarities. Behav- ioral and Brain Sciences21(4), 449–467 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0140525x98001253

    1998

  8. [8]

    Seminars in the Neurosciences2, 263–275 (1990)

    Crick, F., Koch, C.: Toward a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences2, 263–275 (1990)

    1990

  9. [9]

    Cerebral Cortex8(2), 97– 107 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/8.2.97

    Crick, F., Koch, C.: Consciousness and neuroscience. Cerebral Cortex8(2), 97– 107 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/8.2.97

    work page doi:10.1093/cercor/8.2.97 1998

  10. [10]

    Neuropsychologia169, 108202 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108202

    Almeida, V.N.: The neural hierarchy of consciousness: A theoretical model and review on neurophysiology and NCCs. Neuropsychologia169, 108202 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108202

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108202 2022

  11. [11]

    Cognitive Systems Research92, 101374 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101374

    Lubashevsky, I., Lubashevskiy, V.: Towards naturalized phenomenology: Dynam- ics of space-time clouds and power law of working memory. Cognitive Systems Research92, 101374 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101374

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101374 2025

  12. [12]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences362(1481), 857–875 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb

    Kouider, S., Dehaene, S.: Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences362(1481), 857–875 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb. 2007.2093

    work page doi:10.1098/rstb 2007

  13. [13]

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences10(5), 204–211 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007

    Dehaene, S., Changeux, J.-P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., Sergent, C.: Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences10(5), 204–211 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007 2006

  14. [14]

    In: Gosseries, O., Laureys, S., Tononi, G

    Tsuchiya, N., Koch, C.: The relationship between consciousness and top-down attention. In: Gosseries, O., Laureys, S., Tononi, G. (eds.) The Neurology of Conciousness: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropathology, 2nd edn., pp. 71–

  15. [15]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/ b978-0-12-800948-2.00005-4

    Academic Press, Elsevier, San Diego, CA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/ b978-0-12-800948-2.00005-4

    2016

  16. [16]

    Applied Sciences16(2), 1056 (2026) https://doi.org/10.3390/app16021056

    Esteban, F.J., Vargas, E., Langa, J.A., Soler-Toscano, F.: Synchronization, infor- mation, and brain dynamics in consciousness research. Applied Sciences16(2), 1056 (2026) https://doi.org/10.3390/app16021056

    work page doi:10.3390/app16021056 2026

  17. [17]

    Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2021)

    Lubashevsky, I., Plavinska, N.: Physics of the Human Temporality: Com- plex Present. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 20 978-3-030-82612-3

    2021

  18. [18]

    Nature461, 263–266 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature08275

    Resulaj, A., Kiani, R., Wolpert, D.M., Shadlen, M.N.: Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature461, 263–266 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature08275

    2009

  19. [19]

    eLife5, 14790 (2016) https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14790

    Fleming, S.M.: Decision making: Changing our minds about changes of mind. eLife5, 14790 (2016) https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14790

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.14790 2016

  20. [20]

    Trends in Cog- nitive Sciences10(11), 494–501 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.09

    Lamme, V.A.F.: Towards a true neural stance on consciousness. Trends in Cog- nitive Sciences10(11), 494–501 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.09. 001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.09 2006

  21. [21]

    Cognitive Neuroscience1(3), 204–220 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17588921003731586

    Lamme, V.A.F.: How neuroscience will change our view on conscious- ness. Cognitive Neuroscience1(3), 204–220 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17588921003731586

    2010

  22. [22]

    A Dynamic Recursive Unified Internet Design (DRUID),

    Dehaene, S., Changeux, J.-P.: Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron70(2), 200–227 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. neuron.2011.03.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2011

  23. [23]

    Neuron105(5), 776–798 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.026

    Mashour, G.A., Roelfsema, P., Changeux, J.-P., Dehaene, S.: Conscious process- ing and the global neuronal workspace hypothesis. Neuron105(5), 776–798 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.026 2020

  24. [24]

    Neu- roscience & Biobehavioral Reviews170, 106053 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.neubiorev.2025.106053

    Mudrik, L., Boly, M., Dehaene, S., Fleming, S.M., Lamme, V., Seth, A., Melloni, L.: Unpacking the complexities of consciousness: Theories and reflections. Neu- roscience & Biobehavioral Reviews170, 106053 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.neubiorev.2025.106053

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Neuroscience of Consciousness2021(2), 026 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niab026

    Sklar, A.Y., Kardosh, R., Hassin, R.R.: From non-conscious processing to con- scious events: a minimalist approach. Neuroscience of Consciousness2021(2), 026 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niab026

    work page doi:10.1093/nc/niab026 2021

  26. [26]

    Nature Communications7, 10340 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10340

    Atasoy, S., Donnelly, I., Pearson, J.: Human brain networks function in connectome-specific harmonic waves. Nature Communications7, 10340 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10340

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms10340 2016

  27. [27]

    Scientific Reports7, 17661 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17546-0

    Atasoy, S., Roseman, L., Kaelen, M., Kringelbach, M.L., Deco, G., Carhart- Harris, R.L.: Connectome-harmonic decomposition of human brain activity reveals dynamical repertoire re-organization under LSD. Scientific Reports7, 17661 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17546-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17546-0 2017

  28. [28]

    The Neuroscientist24(3), 277–293 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858417728032 21

    Atasoy, S., Deco, G., Kringelbach, M.L., Pearson, J.: Harmonic brain modes: A unifying framework for linking space and time in brain dynamics. The Neuroscientist24(3), 277–293 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858417728032 21

    work page doi:10.1177/1073858417728032 2018

  29. [29]

    Communica- tions Biology6, 117 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04474-1

    Luppi, A.I., Vohryzek, J., Kringelbach, M.L., Mediano, P.A.M., Craig, M.M., Adapa, R., Carhart-Harris, R.L., Roseman, L., Pappas, I., Peattie, A.R.D., Mank- telow, A.E., Sahakian, B.J., Finoia, P., Williams, G.B., Allanson, J., Pickard, J.D., Menon, D.K., Atasoy, S., Stamatakis, E.A.: Distributed harmonic patterns of structure-function dependence orchestr...

    work page doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04474-1 2023

  30. [30]

    Neuropsychopharmacology50(12), 1757–1758 (2025) https://doi

    Haggarty, C.J.: Connectome harmonics: a novel method exploring the psychedelic experience. Neuropsychopharmacology50(12), 1757–1758 (2025) https://doi. org/10.1038/s41386-025-02217-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41386-025-02217-w 2025

  31. [31]

    Neuron98(6), 1269–1281 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.05.019

    Zhang, H., Watrous, A.J., Patel, A., Jacobs, J.: Theta and alpha oscillations are traveling waves in the human neocortex. Neuron98(6), 1269–1281 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.05.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.05.019 2018

  32. [32]

    Nature Human Behaviour8(6), 1124–1135 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01838-3

    Mohan, U.R., Zhang, H., Ermentrout, B., Jacobs, J.: The direction of theta and alpha travelling waves modulates human memory processing. Nature Human Behaviour8(6), 1124–1135 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01838-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41562-024-01838-3 2024

  33. [33]

    Nature Human Behaviour7(7), 1196–1215 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01626-5

    Xu, Y., Long, X., Feng, J., Gong, P.: Interacting spiral wave patterns underlie complex brain dynamics and are related to cognitive processing. Nature Human Behaviour7(7), 1196–1215 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01626-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01626-5 2023

  34. [34]

    Physics Reports1152, 1–43 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2025.10.003

    Nartallo-Kaluarachchi, R., Kringelbach, M., Deco, G., Lambiotte, R., Goriely, A.: Nonequilibrium physics of brain dynamics. Physics Reports1152, 1–43 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2025.10.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2025.10.003 2026

  35. [35]

    Mathematical Neuroscience and Applications2, 2 (2022) https://doi.org/10.46298/mna.7284

    Cook, B.J., Peterson, A.D.H., Woldman, W., Terry, J.R.: Neural field models: A mathematical overview and unifying framework. Mathematical Neuroscience and Applications2, 2 (2022) https://doi.org/10.46298/mna.7284

    work page doi:10.46298/mna.7284 2022

  36. [36]

    Journal of Computational Neuroscience52(4), 267–284 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10827-024-00878-y

    Cooray, G.K., Cooray, V., Friston, K.: A cortical field theory — dynamics and symmetries. Journal of Computational Neuroscience52(4), 267–284 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10827-024-00878-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s10827-024-00878-y 2024

  37. [37]

    Journal of Computational Neuroscience53(2), 373–391 (2025) https://doi

    Cooray, G.K., Cooray, V., Friston, K.J.: Cortical dynamics of neural-connectivity fields. Journal of Computational Neuroscience53(2), 373–391 (2025) https://doi. org/10.1007/s10827-025-00903-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s10827-025-00903-8 2025

  38. [38]

    Progress in Neurobiology224, 102424 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102424

    Lima, B., Florentino, M.M., Fiorani, M., Soares, J.G.M., Schmidt, K.E., Neuen- schwander, S., Baron, J., Gattass, R.: Cortical maps as a fundamental neural substrate for visual representation. Progress in Neurobiology224, 102424 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102424

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102424 2023

  39. [39]

    Journal of Neurophysiology123(5), 22 1606–1618 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00488.2019

    Bertalm´ ıo, M., Calatroni, L., Franceschi, V., Franceschiello, B., Gomez Villa, A., Prandi, D.: Visual illusions via neural dynamics: Wilson–Cowan-type models and the efficient representation principle. Journal of Neurophysiology123(5), 22 1606–1618 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00488.2019

    work page doi:10.1152/jn.00488.2019 2020

  40. [40]

    In: Casagrande, V.A., Guillery, R.W., Sherman, S.M

    Schummers, J., Sharma, J., Sur, M.: Bottom-up and top-down dynamics in visual cortex. In: Casagrande, V.A., Guillery, R.W., Sherman, S.M. (eds.) Cortical Function: a View from the Thalamus, pp. 65–81. Elsevier, Oxford, UK (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6123(05)49006-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(05)49006-8 2005

  41. [41]

    Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience17, 1253234 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom

    Nesse, W.H., Clark, K.L., Noudoost, B.: Information representation in an oscil- lating neural field model modulated by working memory signals. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience17, 1253234 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom. 2023.1253234

    work page doi:10.3389/fncom 2024

  42. [42]

    Neuroscience of Consciousness2025(1), 055 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/ niaf055

    Polyakov, D., Robinson, P.A., Makbili, A., Laureys, S., Gosseries, O., Shriki, O.: Neural field modeling and analysis of consciousness states in the brain. Neuroscience of Consciousness2025(1), 055 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/ niaf055

    work page doi:10.1093/nc/ 2025

  43. [43]

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences28(7), 614–627 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.011

    Stroud, J.P., Duncan, J., Lengyel, M.: The computational foundations of dynamic coding in working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences28(7), 614–627 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.011 2024

  44. [44]

    Cognitive Neurodynamics 18(2), 557–579 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-023-10007-7

    Sabinasz, D., Richter, M., Sch¨ oner, G.: Neural dynamic foundations of a theory of higher cognition: the case of grounding nested phrases. Cognitive Neurodynamics 18(2), 557–579 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-023-10007-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11571-023-10007-7 2023

  45. [45]

    (eds.): Dynamic Thinking: A Primer on Dynamic Field Theory

    Sch¨ oner, G., Spencer, J.P. (eds.): Dynamic Thinking: A Primer on Dynamic Field Theory. Oxford University Press, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10. 1093/acprof:oso/9780199300563.001.0001

    work page arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    Neuron56(2), 366–383 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.012

    Wandell, B.A., Dumoulin, S.O., Brewer, A.A.: Visual field maps in human cortex. Neuron56(2), 366–383 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.012 2007

  47. [47]

    PLOS Computational Biology17(8), 1009216 (2021) https://doi.org/10

    Tu, Y., Ta, D., Lu, Z.-L., Wang, Y.: Topology-preserving smoothing of retinotopic maps. PLOS Computational Biology17(8), 1009216 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pcbi.1009216

    2021

  48. [48]

    Brain Structure and Function227(4), 1507–1522 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-022-02480-3

    Tu, Y., Li, X., Lu, Z.-L., Wang, Y.: Diffeomorphic registration for retinotopic maps of multiple visual regions. Brain Structure and Function227(4), 1507–1522 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-022-02480-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00429-022-02480-3 2022

  49. [49]

    Medical Image Analysis75, 102230 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102230

    Ta, D., Tu, Y., Lu, Z.-L., Wang, Y.: Quantitative characterization of the human retinotopic map based on quasiconformal mapping. Medical Image Analysis75, 102230 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102230

    work page doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102230 2022

  50. [50]

    Neu- roImage326, 121690 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121690 23

    Xiong, Y., Mallak, N.J., Tu, Y., Lu, Z.-L., Wang, Y.: Quantification of planar cortical magnification with optimal transport and topological smoothing. Neu- roImage326, 121690 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121690 23

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121690 2026

  51. [51]

    Journal of Vision25(8), 14 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.8.14

    Ribeiro, F.L., Benson, N.C., Puckett, A.M.: Human retinotopic mapping: From empirical to computational models of retinotopy. Journal of Vision25(8), 14 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.8.14

    work page doi:10.1167/jov.25.8.14 2025

  52. [52]

    American Mathematical Society, Provi- dence, RI (1997)

    Chung, F.R.K.: Spectral Graph Theory. American Mathematical Society, Provi- dence, RI (1997). https://doi.org/10.1090/cbms/092

    work page doi:10.1090/cbms/092 1997

  53. [53]

    Cell Reports36(8), 109554 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep

    Glomb, K., Kringelbach, M.L., Deco, G., Hagmann, P., Pearson, J., Atasoy, S.: Functional harmonics reveal multi-dimensional basis functions underlying cortical organization. Cell Reports36(8), 109554 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep. 2021.109554

    work page doi:10.1016/j.celrep 2021

  54. [54]

    PLOS Computational Biology17(1), 1008310 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pcbi.1008310

    Aqil, M., Atasoy, S., Kringelbach, M.L., Hindriks, R.: Graph neural fields: A framework for spatiotemporal dynamical models on the human connectome. PLOS Computational Biology17(1), 1008310 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pcbi.1008310

    2021

  55. [55]

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences23(5), 423–434 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.004

    Dijkstra, N., Bosch, S.E., Gerven, M.A.J.: Shared neural mechanisms of visual perception and imagery. Trends in Cognitive Sciences23(5), 423–434 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.004 2019

  56. [56]

    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews167, 105902 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev

    Van Caenegem, E.E., Moreno-Verd´ u, M., Waltzing, B.M., Hamoline, G., McAteer, S.M., Frahm, L., Hardwick, R.M.: Multisensory approach in mental imagery: Ale meta-analyses comparing motor, visual and auditory imagery. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews167, 105902 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev. 2024.105902

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev 2024

  57. [57]

    Neuron (2026) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2026.03.013

    Anderson, N.L., Salvo, J.J., Smallwood, J., Braga, R.M.: Mental imagery and perception overlap within transmodal association networks. Neuron (2026) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2026.03.013 . online 31 March 2026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2026.03.013 2026

  58. [58]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences376(1817), 20190689 (2020) https://doi.org/10

    Nanay, B.: Unconscious mental imagery. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences376(1817), 20190689 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1098/rstb.2019.0689

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    eLife9, 53588 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.7554/elife.53588

    Dijkstra, N., Ambrogioni, L., Vidaurre, D., Gerven, M.: Neural dynamics of per- ceptual inference and its reversal during imagery. eLife9, 53588 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.7554/elife.53588

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.53588 2020

  60. [60]

    Nature Communications10, 179 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-018-08080-2

    Linde-Domingo, J., Treder, M.S., Kerr´ en, C., Wimber, M.: Evidence that neural information flow is reversed between object perception and object reconstruction from memory. Nature Communications10, 179 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-018-08080-2

    2019

  61. [61]

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences26(1), 81–96 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.10.011 24

    Groen, I.I.A., Dekker, T.M., Knapen, T., Silson, E.H.: Visuospatial coding as ubiquitous scaffolding for human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences26(1), 81–96 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.10.011 24

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.10.011 2022

  62. [62]

    Singer, W., Effenberger, F.: Oscillations in natural neuronal networks; an epiphe- nomenon or a fundamental computational mechanism? Human Arenas8(3), 846–868 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-025-00478-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s42087-025-00478-x 2025

  63. [63]

    Physics of Life Reviews54, 173–201 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2025.07.009

    Northoff, G., Wolman, A., Zhang, J.: Brain dynamics shape cognition– Spatiotemporal Neuroscience. Physics of Life Reviews54, 173–201 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2025.07.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2025.07.009 2025

  64. [64]

    Biolog- ical Theory11(4), 192–206 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-016-0248-0

    Albertazzi, L., Louie, A.H.: A mathematical science of qualities: A sequel. Biolog- ical Theory11(4), 192–206 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-016-0248-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s13752-016-0248-0 2016

  65. [65]

    Springer, Cham (2017)

    Lubashevsky, I.: Physics of the Human Mind. Springer, Cham (2017). https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51706-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51706-3 2017

  66. [66]

    In: Zalta, E.N

    Healey, R., Gomes, H.: Holism and nonseparability in physics. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2022 edn. Meta- physics Research Lab, Stanford University, ??? (2022). https://plato.stanford. edu/archives/spr2022/entries/physics-holism/

    2022

  67. [67]

    Nature Neuroscience21(4), 617–624 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0104-6

    Fleming, S.M., Putten, E.J., Daw, N.D.: Neural mediators of changes of mind about perceptual decisions. Nature Neuroscience21(4), 617–624 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0104-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0104-6 2018

  68. [68]

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences26(5), 419–431 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.02.004

    Stone, C., Mattingley, J.B., Rangelov, D.: On second thoughts: changes of mind in decision-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences26(5), 419–431 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.02.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.02.004 2022

  69. [69]

    eLife4, 11946 (2015) https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.11946

    Murphy, P.R., Robertson, I.H., Harty, S., O’Connell, R.G.: Neural evidence accu- mulation persists after choice to inform metacognitive judgments. eLife4, 11946 (2015) https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.11946

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.11946 2015

  70. [70]

    Psychological Review 124(1), 91–114 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000045

    Fleming, S.M., Daw, N.D.: Self-Evaluation of Decision-Making: A General Bayesian Framework for Metacognitive Computation. Psychological Review 124(1), 91–114 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000045

    work page doi:10.1037/rev0000045 2017

  71. [71]

    eLife5, 12192 (2016) https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12192

    van den Berg, R., Anandalingam, K., Zylberberg, A., Kiani, R., Shadlen, M.N., Wolpert, D.M.: A common mechanism underlies changes of mind about decisions and confidence. eLife5, 12192 (2016) https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12192

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.12192 2016

  72. [72]

    PLOS Computational Biology16(2), 1007149 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal

    Atiya, N.A.A., Zgonnikov, A., O’Hora, D., Schoemann, M., Scherbaum, S., Wong- Lin, K.: Changes-of-mind in the absence of new post-decision evidence. PLOS Computational Biology16(2), 1007149 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pcbi.1007149

    work page doi:10.1371/journal 2020

  73. [73]

    Cognitive Psychology124, 101358 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101358 25

    Turner, W., Feuerriegel, D., Andrejevi´ c, M., Hester, R., Bode, S.: Perceptual change-of-mind decisions are sensitive to absolute evidence magnitude. Cognitive Psychology124, 101358 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101358 25

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101358 2021

  74. [74]

    Cognition 225, 105125 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105125

    Ko, Y.H., Feuerriegel, D., Turner, W., Overhoff, H., Niessen, E., Stahl, J., Hester, R., Fink, G.R., Weiss, P.H., Bode, S.: Divergent effects of absolute evidence mag- nitude on decision accuracy and confidence in perceptual judgements. Cognition 225, 105125 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105125

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105125 2022

  75. [75]

    Nature Commu- nications15, 4308 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48342-w

    Xie, T., Adamek, M., Cho, H., Adamo, M.A., Ritaccio, A.L., Willie, J.T., Brunner, P., Kubanek, J.: Graded decisions in the human brain. Nature Commu- nications15, 4308 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48342-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48342-w 2024

  76. [76]

    SIAM, Philadelphia, PA (2007)

    LeVeque, R.J.: Finite Difference Methods for Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations: Steady-State and Time-Dependent Problems. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA (2007). https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898717839

    work page doi:10.1137/1.9780898717839 2007

  77. [77]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2007)

    Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P.: Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2007)

    2007

  78. [78]

    Science Advances11(28), 3228 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adr3228

    Durand-de Cuttoli, R., Issler, O., Pedersen, S.M.B., Yakubov, B., Jahan, N., Abid, A., Kasparov, S., Granizo, K., Ahmed, S., Russo, S.J., Nestler, E.J., Sweis, B.M.: Change-of-mind neuroeconomic decision-making is modulated by LINC00473 in medial prefrontal cortex in a sex-dependent manner. Science Advances11(28), 3228 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciad...

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adr3228 2025

  79. [79]

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience17(5), 307–321 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.22

    Koch, C., Massimini, M., Boly, M., Tononi, G.: Neural correlates of conscious- ness: progress and problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience17(5), 307–321 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.22

    work page doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.22 2016

  80. [80]

    org/10.1038/d41586-018-05097-x 26

    Koch, C.: What is consciousness? Nature557(7704), 8–12 (2018) https://doi. org/10.1038/d41586-018-05097-x 26

    work page doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05097-x 2018