pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25433 · v1 · pith:ERSRLAF6new · submitted 2026-05-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Local Structural Signatures of Shear Bands in Metallic Glasses via Electron Nanodiffraction

Huyen T. Pham , Daniel East , Chunguang Tang , Matteo Baggioli , Alessio Zaccone , Timothy C. Petersen , Amelia C. Y. Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 21:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords metallic glassesshear bandselectron nanodiffractioncentrosymmetrystrain mappingplastic deformationTEM lamellaeatomic structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Plastic deformation in metallic glasses arises from coordinated nanoscale structural transformations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Metallic glasses deform plastically along shear bands, but the atomic-scale changes have been hard to measure without damaging the sample during preparation. The work prepares inverted cross-sectional TEM lamellae and uses cryogenic ion polishing to keep the original structure intact, then applies new parameters from electron nanodiffraction to map local centrosymmetry and strain. This reveals narrow stripe-like zones at 45 degrees to the loading direction that contain many atoms rearranged into less symmetric configurations carrying larger shear and normal strains. A sympathetic reader would see this as direct evidence that flow is not a uniform process but occurs through specific, coordinated local atomic rearrangements beneath the visible shear steps.

Core claim

By preparing inverted cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy lamellae of shear bands formed during bending and employing cryogenic ion polishing to minimize preparation artefacts, the intrinsic atomic structure is preserved. Mapping of local centrosymmetry and strain from electron nano-diffraction reveals nanoscale, stripe-like regions oriented at 45 degrees to the applied strain where strain has localized. These regions exhibit a high density of local atomic structures that have transformed to configurations with reduced centrosymmetry and increased magnitudes of shear and normal strain.

What carries the argument

Parameters derived from electron nano-diffraction that quantify local centrosymmetry and strain on cryogenically polished inverted cross-sectional lamellae.

If this is right

  • Plastic deformation localizes into nanoscale stripe-like regions with transformed atomic structures.
  • These regions show reduced centrosymmetry together with higher shear and normal strain.
  • The transformations are coordinated across the plastic zone beneath surface shear steps.
  • Direct experimental mapping of these local changes explains shear-band formation in metallic glasses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same diffraction parameters could be tested on shear bands formed under tension or compression rather than bending.
  • Atomistic simulations could be checked against the measured density of low-centrosymmetry sites inside the stripes.
  • If the preparation method works, it offers a template for studying other disordered solids where ion damage has previously obscured structure.
  • The 45-degree orientation suggests a link to maximum shear planes that could be used to predict band locations in components.

Load-bearing premise

Cryogenic ion polishing of the inverted cross-sectional lamellae sufficiently minimizes preparation artefacts so that the measured local centrosymmetry and strain reflect the intrinsic undeformed atomic structure.

What would settle it

Finding identical centrosymmetry and strain distributions inside and outside the shear-band zones, or observing the same stripe patterns in samples prepared by standard room-temperature ion milling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25433 by Alessio Zaccone, Amelia C. Y. Liu, Chunguang Tang, Daniel East, Huyen T. Pham, Matteo Baggioli, Timothy C. Petersen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Calculation of local structural parameters from scanning electron nanodiffraction (SEND) a) The geometry of SEND in the STEM. b) Electron nanodiffraction pattern obtained from Figure a. The position of the first sharp diffraction maxima in an electron nanodiffraction pattern (b) was fitted with a strain function, ε(ϕ) to extract the components of the local strain (εxx, εyy) and shear strain (εxy) at each s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Local atomic rearrangements under tensile strain in deformed Zr36Cu64 metallic glass ribbons. a) SEM image showing a shear step formed by a shear band in the deformed metallic glass. The black carbon layer indicates the location of the inverted TEM lamella. b) STEM-HAADF image of the inverted TEM lamella; the yellow square marks the shear band location, determined from two fiducial markers on either side o… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Structural changes in a glass due to deformation are subtle and difficult to quantify using conventional imaging and diffraction techniques. Additionally, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) sample preparation using energetic ions often causes structural modifications that are challenging to detect in disordered materials. By preparing inverted cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy lamellae of shear bands formed during bending, and employing cryogenic ion polishing to minimize preparation artefacts, we preserve the intrinsic atomic structure. Using sensitive, new parameters derived from electron nano-diffraction, we directly probe the local nano-scale structure in the plastic zone beneath surface shear steps in metallic glasses. Mapping of local centrosymmetry and strain reveals nanoscale, stripe-like regions oriented at 45 degree to the applied strain where strain has localized. These regions exhibit a high density of local atomic structures that have transformed to configurations with reduced centrosymmetry and increased magnitudes of shear and normal strain. Our results demonstrate that plastic deformation in metallic glasses arises from coordinated nanoscale structural transformations, providing direct experimental insight into a long-standing problem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that by preparing inverted cross-sectional TEM lamellae of shear bands in metallic glasses via cryogenic ion polishing and applying new parameters from electron nanodiffraction, local mappings of centrosymmetry and strain reveal stripe-like regions at 45° to the applied strain with reduced centrosymmetry and elevated shear/normal strain; these are interpreted as evidence that plastic deformation arises from coordinated nanoscale structural transformations.

Significance. If the preparation artefacts are demonstrably absent and the mappings are reproducible, the work would supply direct experimental access to the local atomic configurations inside shear bands, a long-standing gap in metallic-glass plasticity research. The approach of combining cross-sectional geometry with nanodiffraction parameters is potentially enabling for disordered materials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Methods] Abstract and Methods: No quantitative validation is presented (e.g., centrosymmetry histograms or strain distributions comparing deformed vs. undeformed regions of the same lamella, or cryogenic vs. room-temperature polishing controls). Because the central claim requires that the observed reductions in centrosymmetry and increases in strain are intrinsic rather than ion-induced, this omission is load-bearing.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The support for the claim of 'coordinated nanoscale structural transformations' cannot be assessed; the text supplies neither error bars, statistical tests, nor comparison to undeformed controls, leaving the strength of the stripe-like features and their 45° orientation unquantified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The term 'inverted cross-sectional lamellae' is introduced without a schematic or explicit description of the geometry relative to the bending axis; a figure clarifying the orientation would aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the quantitative support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Methods] Abstract and Methods: No quantitative validation is presented (e.g., centrosymmetry histograms or strain distributions comparing deformed vs. undeformed regions of the same lamella, or cryogenic vs. room-temperature polishing controls). Because the central claim requires that the observed reductions in centrosymmetry and increases in strain are intrinsic rather than ion-induced, this omission is load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that direct quantitative comparisons are required to rule out ion-induced artifacts. In the revised manuscript we will add (i) centrosymmetry and strain histograms with error bars for deformed versus undeformed regions extracted from the same lamella and (ii) equivalent data from control lamellae prepared by room-temperature ion polishing. These additions will be placed in a new subsection of the Methods and in the Results to demonstrate that the observed reductions in centrosymmetry and elevations in strain are intrinsic to the shear-band material. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The support for the claim of 'coordinated nanoscale structural transformations' cannot be assessed; the text supplies neither error bars, statistical tests, nor comparison to undeformed controls, leaving the strength of the stripe-like features and their 45° orientation unquantified.

    Authors: We will revise the abstract to include a concise statement of the statistical significance of the stripe-like features. In the main text and supplementary figures we will add (i) error bars on all reported strain and centrosymmetry values, (ii) direct side-by-side comparisons to undeformed control regions, and (iii) quantitative measures (angular histograms and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests) confirming the 45° orientation preference. These changes will allow readers to assess the strength of the evidence for coordinated structural transformations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; purely observational experimental study with no derivations or self-referential predictions.

full rationale

The manuscript presents experimental TEM/nanodiffraction mapping of centrosymmetry and strain in shear bands of metallic glasses. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or theoretical derivations are described that could reduce to inputs by construction. Claims rest on direct measurements after sample preparation, with no self-citation chains or ansatzes invoked as load-bearing steps. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks as an observational report.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental paper; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced. The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the chosen sample-preparation route leaves the disordered structure unaltered.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Cryogenic ion polishing of inverted cross-sectional lamellae preserves the intrinsic atomic structure of metallic glasses without detectable artefacts.
    Invoked in the abstract as the justification for the observed structural signatures being intrinsic rather than preparation-induced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5727 in / 1224 out tokens · 27522 ms · 2026-06-29T21:50:21.048228+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references

  1. [1]

    T. G. Ingram, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 1934, 145, 362

    1934

  2. [2]

    P. B. Hirsch, M. J. Whelan, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 1960, 252, 499

    1960

  3. [3]

    M. J. Hÿtch, E. Snoeck, R. Kilaas, Ultramicroscopy 1998, 74, 131

    1998

  4. [4]

    W. L. Johnson, J. Lu, M. D. Demetriou, Intermetallics (Barking). 2002, 10, 1039

    2002

  5. [5]

    P. M. Anderson, J. P. Hirth, J. Lothe, Theory of Dislocations , Cambridge University Press, 2017

    2017

  6. [6]

    C. P. Royall, S. R. Williams, Phys. Rep. 2015, 560, 1

    2015

  7. [7]

    R. M. O. Mota, E. T. Lund, S. Sohn, D. J. Browne, D. C. Hofmann, S. Curtarolo, A. van de Walle, J. Schroers, Commun. Mater. 2021, 2, 23

    2021

  8. [8]

    W. H. Wang, Y. Yang, T. G. Nieh, C. T. Liu, Intermetallics (Barking). 2015, 67, 81

    2015

  9. [9]

    M. L. Falk, J. S. Langer, Phys. Rev. E 1998, 57, 7192

    1998

  10. [10]

    Nicolas, E

    A. Nicolas, E. E. Ferrero, K. Martens, J. -L. Barrat, Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018, 90, 45006

    2018

  11. [11]

    E. T. Lund, S. Sohn, A. van de Walle, S. Curtarolo, D. Hofmann, J. Schroers, Materialia (Oxf). 2025, 40, 102408

    2025

  12. [12]

    L. H. Dai, in Adiabatic Shear Localization (Second Edition) , Elsevier, Oxford, 2012, 311–361

    2012

  13. [13]

    V Sergueeva, N

    A. V Sergueeva, N. A. Mara, J. D. Kuntz, D. J. Branagan, A. K. Mukherjee, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 383, 219

    2004

  14. [14]

    G. N. Yang, B. A. Sun, S. Q. Chen, Y. Shao, K. F. Yao, J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 695, 3457

    2017

  15. [15]

    M. J. Kramer, D. J. Sordelet, A. F. Bastarows, X. Tan, S. B. Biner, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2005, 351, 2159

    2005

  16. [16]

    A. S. Argon, Acta Metall. 1979, 27, 47. 30

    1979

  17. [17]

    T. C. Pekin, J. Ding, C. Gammer, B. Ozdol, C. Ophus, M. Asta, R. O. Ritchie, A. M. Minor, Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2445

    2019

  18. [18]

    Glushko, R

    O. Glushko, R. Pippan, D. Şopu, C. Mitterer, J. Eckert, Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 5601

    2024

  19. [19]

    R. Maaß, J. F. Löffler, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 2353

    2015

  20. [20]

    Y. Leng, T. H. Courtney, J. Mater. Sci. 1991, 26, 588

    1991

  21. [21]

    Hieronymus-Schmidt, H

    V. Hieronymus-Schmidt, H. Rösner, G. Wilde, A. Zaccone, Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 134111

    2017

  22. [22]

    Y. Cao, J. Li, B. Kou, C. Xia, Z. Li, R. Chen, H. Xie, T. Xiao, W. Kob, L. Hong, others, Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2911

    2018

  23. [23]

    Niiyama, M

    T. Niiyama, M. Wakeda, T. Shimokawa, S. Ogata, Phys. Rev. E 2019, 100, 43002

    2019

  24. [24]

    E. D. Bøjesen, T. C. Petersen, A. V. Martin, M. Weyland, A. C. Y. Liu, JPhys Mater.: Materials 2020, 3

    2020

  25. [25]

    Rösner, A

    H. Rösner, A. Bera, A. Zaccone, Phys. Rev. B 2024, 110, 14107

    2024

  26. [26]

    M. H. Lee, E. S. Park, R. T. Ott, B. S. Kim, J. Eckert, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 61906

    2014

  27. [27]

    Dasgupta, H

    R. Dasgupta, H. G. E. Hentschel, I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 255502

    2012

  28. [28]

    D. Şopu, A. Stukowski, M. Stoica, S. Scudino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119

    2017

  29. [29]

    Baggioli, I

    M. Baggioli, I. Kriuchevskyi, T. W. Sirk, A. Zaccone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 127 015501

    2021

  30. [30]

    Zhang, H

    L. Zhang, H. Zhang, Prog. Mater. Sci. 2025, 152, 101472

    2025

  31. [31]

    Q. Qiao, L. Wang, C. W. Tam, X. Gong, X. Dong, Y. Lin, W. I. Lam, H. Qian, D. Guo, D. Zhang, C. T. Kwok, L. M. Tam, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2024, 902

    2024

  32. [32]

    X. Meng, W. Wang, Y. Xie, N. Wang, X. Ma, J. Dong, J. Gao, T. Yang, Y. Huang, Mater. Charact. 2026, 231

    2026

  33. [33]

    L. Shao, C. Liu, Y. Chen, X. Zhang, N. Xue, W. Li, Y. Wu, Y. Liu, K. Sajjad, S. Liu, Y. Wang, X. Tong, Z. Liu, B. Jiang, J. Huang, L. Zhu, Mater. Des. 2026, 264

    2026

  34. [34]

    A. C. Y. Liu, D. M. Paganin, L. Bourgeois, P. N. H. Nakashima, R. T. Ott, M. J. Kramer, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2011, 84

    2011

  35. [35]

    C. Liu, V. Roddatis, P. Kenesei, R. Maaß, Acta Mater. 2017, 140, 206

    2017

  36. [36]

    X. Mu, M. R. Chellali, E. Boltynjuk, D. Gunderov, R. Z. Valiev, H. Hahn, C. Kübel, Y. Ivanisenko, L. Velasco, Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2007267

    2021

  37. [37]

    Gammer, C

    C. Gammer, C. Ophus, T. C. Pekin, J. Eckert, A. M. Minor, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112. 31

    2018

  38. [38]

    S. Kang, D. Wang, A. Caron, C. Minnert, K. Durst, C. Kübel, X. Mu, Adv. Mater. 2023, 35

    2023

  39. [39]

    Ophus, Microsc

    C. Ophus, Microsc. Microanal. 2019, 25, 563

    2019

  40. [40]

    A. C. Y. Liu, M. J. Neish, G. Stokol, G. A. Buckley, L. A. Smillie, M. D. De Jonge, R. T. Ott, M. J. Kramer, L. Bourgeois, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110

    2013

  41. [41]

    J. M. Gibson, M. M. J. Treacy, T. Sun, N. J. Zaluzec, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 125504

    2010

  42. [42]

    A. C. Y. Liu, G. R. Lumpkin, T. C. Petersen, J. Etheridge, L. Bourgeois, Acta Crystallogr. A Found. Adv. 2015, 71, 473

    2015

  43. [43]

    G. A. C. Ortiz, M. Islam, G. H. Yoo, J. Y. Kim, S. Im, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Fan, Y. Wang, E. S. Park, J. Hwang, Acta Mater. 2025, 298, 121402

    2025

  44. [44]

    V Martin, E

    A. V Martin, E. D. Bøjesen, T. C. Petersen, C. Hu, M. J. Biggs, M. Weyland, A. C. Y. Liu, Small 2020, 16, 2000828

    2020

  45. [45]

    A. C. Y. Liu, R. F. Tabor, M. D. de Jonge, S. T. Mudie, T. C. Petersen, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2017, 114, 10344

    2017

  46. [46]

    A. C. Y. Liu, E. D. Bøjesen, R. F. Tabor, S. T. Mudie, A. Zaccone, P. Harrowell, T. C. Petersen, Sci. Adv. 2022, 8

    2022

  47. [47]

    A. C. Y. Liu, H. Pham, A. Bera, T. C. Petersen, T. W. Sirk, S. T. Mudie, R. F. Tabor, J. Nunez-Iglesias, A. Zaccone, M. Baggioli, Acta Crystallogr. A 2026, 82

    2026

  48. [48]

    Milkus, A

    R. Milkus, A. Zaccone, Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 94204

    2016

  49. [49]

    Schlegel, J

    M. Schlegel, J. Brujic, E. M. Terentjev, A. Zaccone, Sci. Rep. 2016, 6

    2016

  50. [50]

    C. E. Maloney, A. Lemaıtre, Phys. Rev. E 2006, 74, 16118

    2006

  51. [51]

    Zhang, A

    Y. Zhang, A. L. Greer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89, 71907

    2006

  52. [52]

    J. Luo, L. Huang, Y. Shi, B. Deng, Acta Mater. 2023, 248, 118787

    2023

  53. [53]

    M. W. Tate, P. Purohit, D. Chamberlain, K. X. Nguyen, R. Hovden, C. S. Chang, P. Deb, E. Turgut, J. T. Heron, D. G. Schlom, D. C. Ralph, G. D. Fuchs, K. S. Shanks, H. T. Philipp, D. A. Muller, S. M. Gruner, Microsc. Microanal. 2016, 22, 237

    2016

  54. [54]

    A. C. Y. Liu, R. F. Tabor, L. Bourgeois, M. D. De Jonge, S. T. Mudie, T. C. Petersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116

    2016

  55. [55]

    Neukirch, B

    S. Neukirch, B. Audoly, Proc. R. Soc. A : Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2021, 477, 20210548

    2021

  56. [56]

    C. Tang, H. Peng, Y. Chen, M. Ferry, J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 120

    2016

  57. [57]

    L. Li, E. R. Homer, C. A. Schuh, Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 3347. 32

    2013

  58. [58]

    R. Maaß, K. Samwer, W. Arnold, C. A. Volkert, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 171902

    2014

  59. [59]

    R. Maaß, P. Birckigt, C. Borchers, K. Samwer, C. A. Volkert, Acta Mater. 2015, 98, 94

    2015

  60. [60]

    Y. Z. Lu, M. Q. Jiang, X. Lu, Z. X. Qin, Y. J. Huang, J. Shen, Phys. Rev. Appl. 2018, 9, 14023

    2018

  61. [61]

    Ozawa, L

    M. Ozawa, L. Berthier, G. Biroli, A. Rosso, G. Tarjus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018, 115, 6656

    2018

  62. [62]

    Y. F. Gao, L. Wang, H. Bei, T. G. Nieh, Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 4159

    2011

  63. [63]

    R. D. Conner, W. L. Johnson, N. E. Paton, W. D. Nix, J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 94, 904

    2003

  64. [64]

    Tian, Y.-J

    Z.-L. Tian, Y.-J. Wang, Y. Chen, L.-H. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 94103

    2017

  65. [65]

    E. J. Kirkland, Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy , Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2021

    2021

  66. [66]

    J. Dong, H. Peng, H. Wang, Y. Tong, Y. Wang, W. Dmowski, T. Egami, B. Sun, W. Wang, H. Bai, Nat. Phys. 2023, 19, 1896

    2023

  67. [67]

    Parisi, I

    G. Parisi, I. Procaccia, C. Rainone, M. Singh, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2017, 114, 5577

    2017

  68. [68]

    A. D. S. Parmar, S. Kumar, S. Sastry, Phys. Rev. X 2019, 9, 21018

    2019

  69. [69]

    Zaccone, Theory of Disordered Solids, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2023

    A. Zaccone, Theory of Disordered Solids, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2023

    2023

  70. [70]

    Zaccone, E

    A. Zaccone, E. Scossa-Romano, Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 184205

    2011

  71. [71]

    S. H. Chen, K. C. Chan, L. Xia, Intermetallics (Barking). 2013, 43, 38

    2013

  72. [72]

    J. S. Langer, Scr. Mater. 2006, 54, 375

    2006

  73. [73]

    Schall, D

    P. Schall, D. A. Weitz, F. Spaepen, Science (1979). 2007, 318, 1895

    1979

  74. [74]

    K. E. Jensen, D. A. Weitz, F. Spaepen, Phys. Rev. E 2014, 90, 42305

    2014

  75. [75]

    Wochner, C

    P. Wochner, C. Gutt, T. Autenrieth, T. Demmer, V. Bugaev, A. D. Ortiz, A. Duri, F. Zontone, G. Grübel, H. Dosch, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009, 106, 11511

    2009

  76. [76]

    Savitzky, M

    Abraham. Savitzky, M. J. E. Golay, Anal. Chem. 1964, 36, 1627

    1964

  77. [77]

    Bohlender, D

    D. Bohlender, D. Durand, P. Dowler, C. B. Markwardt, Non-Linear Least-Squares Fitting in IDL with MPFIT, 2009

    2009

  78. [78]

    T. Aste, M. Saadatfar, A. Sakellariou, T. J. Senden, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 2004, 339, 16. 33

    2004

  79. [79]

    Y. Yang, J. Zhou, F. Zhu, Y. Yuan, D. J. Chang, D. S. Kim, M. Pham, A. Rana, X. Tian, Y. Yao, S. J. Osher, A. K. Schmid, L. Hu, P. Ercius, J. Miao, Nature 2021, 592

    2021