pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25467 · v1 · pith:JSQQ4LZZnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA

Discovery of Molecular and Atomic Gas associated with HESS J1646-458 (Westerlund 1): Spatial TeV Gamma-Ray and Interstellar Proton Correspondence

H. Sano , Y. Fukui , S. Fujimori , T. Murase , R. Z. E. Alsaberi , M. D. Filipovi\'c , G. Rowell , M. Aruga
show 16 more authors
Y. Asano R. G. Bhuvana F. Demachi S. Einecke N. Fukaya R. Hamada H. Inoue T. Kamazaki S. Lazarevi\'c T. Minamidani Z. J. Smeaton H. Sudou K. Tachihara H. Takaba K. Tsuge R. I. Yamada
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 20:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords TeV gamma raysWesterlund 1hadronic emissionmolecular cloudscosmic ray protonsinterstellar gascloud-cloud collisionwind-blown bubble
0
0 comments X

The pith

Molecular and atomic gas around Westerlund 1 shows moderate spatial match to the TeV gamma-ray shell of HESS J1646-458, supporting hadronic origin and total cosmic-ray proton energy of 6e49 erg.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports CO and HI observations revealing molecular clouds at velocities near -32 km/s that form arc-like structures and a central cavity consistent with a wind-blown bubble from Westerlund 1, plus velocity signatures of possible cloud-cloud collision. On larger scales the interstellar proton column density between -36 and -23 km/s exhibits moderate spatial correspondence with the TeV gamma-ray shell. Combined with a total gas mass of 1.6 million solar masses and the lack of bright synchrotron X-rays, these data indicate that the gamma rays arise from cosmic-ray protons interacting with the gas rather than leptonic processes. This association permits a direct calculation of the total energy contained in the accelerated protons.

Core claim

The interstellar proton column density at V_LSR from -36 to -23 km s^{-1} displays moderate spatial correspondence with the TeV gamma-ray shell. Together with the gas mass of approximately 1.6 times 10^6 solar masses and the absence of bright synchrotron X-rays, the TeV emission surrounding Westerlund 1 is consistent with hadronic production. The finding yields a total energy of accelerated cosmic-ray protons of approximately 6 times 10^49 erg. The same velocity components also show arc-like 8-micron structures, a cavity with 5 km/s expansion, and complementary cloud distributions indicative of physical association with the cluster via wind bubble and cloud-cloud collision.

What carries the argument

The spatial correspondence between the velocity-specific interstellar proton column density and the TeV gamma-ray shell morphology, used to infer hadronic pion-decay emission.

If this is right

  • The TeV gamma-ray emission is produced by cosmic-ray protons colliding with interstellar gas rather than by leptonic processes.
  • The total energy in accelerated cosmic-ray protons is approximately 6 times 10^49 erg.
  • Both the molecular and atomic gas at the relevant velocities are physically associated with Westerlund 1.
  • Star formation near the cluster may have been triggered by the cloud-cloud collision whose signatures are observed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the association holds, stellar winds from young massive clusters supply a measurable fraction of the energy in Galactic cosmic rays above GeV energies.
  • Similar column-density to TeV-shell comparisons could be applied to other unidentified or cluster-associated TeV sources to test for hadronic contributions.
  • The wind-blown cavity may act as a site where particles are accelerated or confined before interacting with the surrounding gas.

Load-bearing premise

The moderate spatial match between the specific-velocity gas column density and the TeV shell reflects a genuine physical connection rather than chance line-of-sight alignment, and the gamma rays are produced by hadronic rather than leptonic processes.

What would settle it

High-resolution maps showing that the TeV emission does not follow the velocity-specific gas distribution, or the detection of bright non-thermal X-ray synchrotron emission from the same region, would undermine the hadronic interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25467 by F. Demachi, G. Rowell, H. Inoue, H. Sano, H. Sudou, H. Takaba, K. Tachihara, K. Tsuge, M. Aruga, M. D. Filipovi\'c, N. Fukaya, R. G. Bhuvana, R. Hamada, R. I. Yamada, R. Z. E. Alsaberi, S. Einecke, S. Fujimori, S. Lazarevi\'c, T. Kamazaki, T. Minamidani, T. Murase, Y. Asano, Y. Fukui, Z. J. Smeaton.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) TeV gamma-ray significance map of HESS J1646−458 (Aharonian et al. 2022). The contour levels are 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16σ. The open square annotates the position of Wd1. The gamma-ray sources HESS J1641−463 and HESS J1640−465 that are not related to HESS J1646−458 are also shown by open and filled circles, respectively. The symbols of open/filled triangles and a diamond represent the positions of PSR … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Integrated intensity maps and position–velocity (p–v) diagrams of the NANTEN & NANTEN2 12CO(J = 1–0) (a, b) and the ATCA & Parkes Hi (c, d). The integration range is from −36 to −23 km s−1 in velocity for each integrated intensity map and from 338. ◦ 57 to 340. ◦ 14 in Galactic Longitude for each p–v diagram. The superposed contours in each integrated intensity map are the same as shown in Figure 1a. The d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Enlarged view of the southern TeV gamma-ray shell. The superposed contours indicate the distribution of averaged Hi brightness temperature in a velocity range from −36 to −23 km s−1 . (b) Line profiles of CO and Hi at (l, b) ∼ (339. ◦ 15, −0. ◦ 91). The CO brightness temperature is scaled by a factor of 10 to match the vertical axis. The vertical dashed lines represent a velocity range from −36 to −23 … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Enlarged view of Westerlund 1 and its surroundings. (a, b) Integrated intensity maps of the ASTE 12CO(J = 3–2). The integration velocity range is from −39 to −29 km s−1 . The lowest contour level and the interval are 12.0 and 1.5 K km s−1 , respectively. The background colored image in (a) represents the JWST MIRI/NIRCam composite image (Guarcello et al. 2025). The red, green, and blue represent the F1130W… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a–c) Same integrated intensity maps as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) ASTE 12CO(J = 3–2) distributions of the blue cloud (VLSR: −57–−46 km s−1 ) and the red cloud (VLSR: −39–−29 km s−1 ) superimposed on the JWST image in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Same as Figure 1a, but overlaid with 16 boxes that are used for the gamma-ray flux ϕ0 calculation in Aharonian et al. (2022). (b) Ratio map of Np(Hi)/Np(H2). (c) Distribution of the total ISM proton column density Np(Hi + H2). The superposed contours are the same as shown in Figure 1a. (d) Scatter plot between Np(Hi + H2) and ϕ0. The green line shows the linear regression by χ 2 fitting (see the text).… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same integrated intensity maps and p–v diagrams of CO and Hi as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same maps of Np(Hi + H2), Np(Hi)/Np(H2) ratio, and the scatter plots between Np(Hi + H2) and ϕ0 as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report CO and HI studies of molecular and atomic gas toward the TeV gamma-ray source HESS J1646$-$458, widely considered to be associated with the young massive cluster Westerlund 1 (Wd1). We found that molecular clouds at $V_\mathrm{LSR} \sim$$-32$ km s$^{-1}$ coincide with arc-like structures seen at 8 $\mu$m, likely illuminated by strong FUV radiation from Wd1. $^{12}$CO($J$ = 3-2) emission at the same velocity reveals a cavity-like structure with an expansion velocity of $\sim$$5$ km s$^{-1}$ toward the central region of Wd1, suggesting a recently formed wind-blown bubble driven by the cluster. We also identify a complementary spatial distribution between the $V_\mathrm{LSR} \sim$$-55$ and $\sim$$-32$ km s$^{-1}$ clouds, connected by an intermediate-velocity component at $V_\mathrm{LSR} \sim$$-44$ km s$^{-1}$. These characteristics are consistent with signatures of triggered star formation through a cloud-cloud collision and imply that both clouds are physically associated with Wd1. On larger scales, the total interstellar proton column density at $V_\mathrm{LSR}$ $\sim$$-36$-$-23$ km s$^{-1}$ shows a moderate spatial correspondence with the TeV gamma-ray shell. Together with this correlation, a substantial gas mass of $\sim$$1.6 \times 10^6$ $M_\odot$, and the absence of bright synchrotron X-rays, the TeV gamma-ray emission surrounding Wd1 is consistent with the hadronic origin. The present finding allows us to calculate the total energy of accelerated cosmic-ray protons to be $\sim$$6 \times 10^{49}$ erg.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports CO(3-2) and HI observations toward HESS J1646-458/Westerlund 1, identifying molecular clouds at V_LSR ≈ −32 km s^{-1} that coincide with 8 μm arc-like structures and a cavity with ~5 km s^{-1} expansion, interpreted as a wind-blown bubble. Complementary spatial distributions between velocity components at −55 and −32 km s^{-1} connected by an intermediate-velocity bridge at −44 km s^{-1} are presented as evidence for cloud-cloud collision and triggered star formation. On larger scales, the interstellar proton column density integrated over V_LSR ∼ −36 to −23 km s^{-1} is stated to show moderate spatial correspondence with the TeV gamma-ray shell; combined with a total gas mass of ∼1.6×10^6 M_⊙ and the absence of bright synchrotron X-rays, this is used to argue for a hadronic origin and to derive a total energy in accelerated cosmic-ray protons of ∼6×10^{49} erg.

Significance. If the claimed physical association holds, the result would provide one of the few direct gas-mass anchors for the hadronic gamma-ray luminosity near a young massive cluster, yielding a concrete W_p estimate that can be compared with the cluster's mechanical power budget. The kinematic signatures of cloud-cloud collision also add to the growing sample of triggered star formation in the vicinity of Westerlund 1.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and § (results on large-scale correspondence): the central claim that the TeV emission is hadronic rests on the statement of 'moderate spatial correspondence' between N(H) at V_LSR ∼ −36 to −23 km s^{-1} and the gamma-ray shell. No correlation coefficient, overlap significance, or Monte-Carlo test against randomized maps or adjacent velocity slices is provided; without such a test the association could be consistent with chance projection in the Galactic plane, rendering both the hadronic interpretation and the derived W_p ∼ 6×10^{49} erg unsupported.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and velocity-selection paragraphs: the velocity window V_LSR ∼ −36 to −23 km s^{-1} is presented without demonstration that the reported spatial match is robust to the exact choice of integration limits. Adjacent slices or a systematic search over velocity should be shown to establish that the correspondence is not an artifact of bin selection.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: velocity notation mixes ∼ and − symbols inconsistently (e.g., V_LSR ∼−36–−23); adopt uniform formatting throughout the manuscript.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. The points regarding the need for quantitative statistical support for the spatial correspondence and robustness checks on the velocity integration window are well taken. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate correlation analyses, Monte Carlo tests, and additional velocity-slice comparisons to strengthen the evidence for the hadronic origin and the derived proton energy budget.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and § (results on large-scale correspondence): the central claim that the TeV emission is hadronic rests on the statement of 'moderate spatial correspondence' between N(H) at V_LSR ∼ −36 to −23 km s^{-1} and the gamma-ray shell. No correlation coefficient, overlap significance, or Monte-Carlo test against randomized maps or adjacent velocity slices is provided; without such a test the association could be consistent with chance projection in the Galactic plane, rendering both the hadronic interpretation and the derived W_p ∼ 6×10^{49} erg unsupported.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript presents the spatial correspondence qualitatively without statistical quantification. In the revision we will add a pixel-by-pixel Spearman correlation coefficient between the integrated N(H) map and the TeV intensity, together with a Monte Carlo test that randomizes the gamma-ray morphology or compares against adjacent velocity slices to quantify the significance against chance alignment. These additions will provide a firmer statistical foundation for the hadronic interpretation and the W_p estimate. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and velocity-selection paragraphs: the velocity window V_LSR ∼ −36 to −23 km s^{-1} is presented without demonstration that the reported spatial match is robust to the exact choice of integration limits. Adjacent slices or a systematic search over velocity should be shown to establish that the correspondence is not an artifact of bin selection.

    Authors: We acknowledge that robustness to the precise velocity limits was not demonstrated. The revised version will include maps of N(H) for adjacent velocity intervals (e.g., −40 to −27 km s^{-1} and −32 to −19 km s^{-1}) and a brief systematic scan over a range of integration windows, showing that the chosen interval yields the strongest morphological match. This will confirm that the reported correspondence is not an artifact of bin selection. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's conclusions rest on direct observational mappings of CO/HI gas at specific velocities, reported spatial overlap with the TeV shell, measured gas mass of 1.6e6 solar masses, and the absence of bright synchrotron X-rays. The proton energy estimate of ~6e49 erg follows from applying standard hadronic scaling relations to these independent inputs. No equations, self-citations, or ansatzes are shown that reduce any claimed result to a fitted parameter or definition by construction. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard radio-astronomy assumptions for mass conversion and velocity-based association; no new entities are introduced and no parameters are explicitly fitted beyond velocity window selection.

free parameters (2)
  • X_CO conversion factor
    Standard value assumed to convert CO intensity to H2 column density, directly affecting the reported gas mass and proton energy.
  • Distance to Westerlund 1
    Adopted distance enters the mass calculation of 1.6e6 solar masses.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Velocity coincidence implies physical association with the cluster
    Used to link the -32 and -55 km/s components to Wd1.
  • domain assumption Gamma-ray production is dominated by proton-proton interactions
    Invoked to interpret the spatial match as hadronic and to compute proton energy from gas mass.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6029 in / 1559 out tokens · 44496 ms · 2026-06-29T20:51:49.090537+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [4]

    2012, , 537, A114, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117928

    Abramowski , A., Acero , F., Aharonian , F., et al. 2012, , 537, A114, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117928

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117928 2012

  4. [5]

    2014 a , , 794, L1, 10.1088/2041-8205/794/1/L1

    Abramowski , A., Aharonian , F., Ait Benkhali , F., et al. 2014 a , , 794, L1, 10.1088/2041-8205/794/1/L1

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/794/1/l1 2014

  5. [6]

    A., et al

    Abramowski , A., Aharonian , F., Benkhali , F. A., et al. 2014 b , , 439, 2828, 10.1093/mnras/stu139

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu139 2014

  6. [7]

    2011, Science, 334, 1103, 10.1126/science.1210311

    Ackermann , M., Ajello , M., Allafort , A., et al. 2011, Science, 334, 1103, 10.1126/science.1210311

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1210311 2011

  7. [8]

    2013, Science, 339, 807, 10.1126/science.1231160

    ---. 2013, Science, 339, 807, 10.1126/science.1231160

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1231160 2013

  8. [9]

    W., Smith , N., et al

    Aghakhanloo , M., Murphy , J. W., Smith , N., et al. 2020, , 492, 2497, 10.1093/mnras/stz3628

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3628 2020

  9. [10]

    2021, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 5, 14, 10.3847/2515-5172/abdc2c

    ---. 2021, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 5, 14, 10.3847/2515-5172/abdc2c

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abdc2c 2021

  10. [11]

    2022, , 666, A124, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244323

    Aharonian , F., Ashkar , H., Backes , M., et al. 2022, , 666, A124, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244323

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244323 2022

  11. [12]

    R., Davies , B., Smith , N., Gehrz , R

    Beasor , E. R., Davies , B., Smith , N., Gehrz , R. D., & Figer , D. F. 2021, , 912, 16, 10.3847/1538-4357/abec44

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abec44 2021

  12. [13]

    Bell , A. R. 1978, , 182, 147, 10.1093/mnras/182.2.147

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/182.2.147 1978

  13. [14]

    D., & Ostriker , J

    Blandford , R. D., & Ostriker , J. P. 1978, , 221, L29, 10.1086/182658

    work page doi:10.1086/182658 1978

  14. [15]

    D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A

    Bolatto , A. D., Wolfire , M., & Leroy , A. K. 2013, , 51, 207, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944 2013

  15. [16]

    D., Smeaton , Z., et al

    Bradley , A., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Smeaton , Z., et al. 2025, , 42, e101, 10.1017/pasa.2025.10070

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2025.10070 2025

  16. [17]

    S., Stolte , A., et al

    Brandner , W., Clark , J. S., Stolte , A., et al. 2008, , 478, 137, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077579

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077579 2008

  17. [18]

    Bykov , A. M. 2014, , 22, 77, 10.1007/s00159-014-0077-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-014-0077-8 2014

  18. [19]

    Casse , M., & Paul , J. A. 1980, , 237, 236, 10.1086/157863

    work page doi:10.1086/157863 1980

  19. [20]

    J., & Montmerle , T

    Cesarsky , C. J., & Montmerle , T. 1983, , 36, 173, 10.1007/BF00167503

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00167503 1983

  20. [21]

    S., Agudo , I., et al

    Cherenkov Telescope Array Consortium , Acharya , B. S., Agudo , I., et al. 2019, Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array , 10.1142/10986

    work page doi:10.1142/10986 2019

  21. [22]

    L., Meade , M

    Churchwell , E., Babler , B. L., Meade , M. R., et al. 2009, , 121, 213, 10.1086/597811

    work page doi:10.1086/597811 2009

  22. [23]

    S., Negueruela , I., Crowther , P

    Clark , J. S., Negueruela , I., Crowther , P. A., & Goodwin , S. P. 2005, , 434, 949, 10.1051/0004-6361:20042413

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042413 2005

  23. [24]

    S., Ritchie , B

    Clark , J. S., Ritchie , B. W., & Negueruela , I. 2020, , 635, A187, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935903

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935903 2020

  24. [25]

    2006, MNRAS, 372, 1699, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10972.x

    Crowther , P. A., Hadfield , L. J., Clark , J. S., Negueruela , I., & Vacca , W. D. 2006, , 372, 1407, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10952.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10952.x 2006

  25. [26]

    Davies , B., & Beasor , E. R. 2019, , 486, L10, 10.1093/mnrasl/slz050

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz050 2019

  26. [27]

    M., & Lockman , F

    Dickey , J. M., & Lockman , F. J. 1990, , 28, 215, 10.1146/annurev.aa.28.090190.001243

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.28.090190.001243 1990

  27. [28]

    2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Ezawa , H., Kawabe , R., Kohno , K., & Yamamoto , S. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 5489, Ground-based Telescopes, ed. J. M. Oschmann , Jr., 763--772, 10.1117/12.551391

    work page doi:10.1117/12.551391 2004

  28. [29]

    Fok , T. K. T., Nakashima , J.-i., Yung , B. H. K., Hsia , C.-H., & Deguchi , S. 2012, , 760, 65, 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/65

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/760/1/65 2012

  29. [30]

    2014, , 788, 94, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/94

    Fukuda , T., Yoshiike , S., Sano , H., et al. 2014, , 788, 94, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/94

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/788/1/94 2014

  30. [31]

    2024, , 961, 162, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0da3

    Fukui , Y., Aruga , M., Sano , H., et al. 2024, , 961, 162, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0da3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0da3 2024

  31. [32]

    2021 a , , 73, S1, 10.1093/pasj/psaa103

    Fukui , Y., Habe , A., Inoue , T., Enokiya , R., & Tachihara , K. 2021 a , , 73, S1, 10.1093/pasj/psaa103

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psaa103 2021

  32. [33]

    2021 b , , 915, 84, 10.3847/1538-4357/abff4a

    Fukui , Y., Sano , H., Yamane , Y., et al. 2021 b , , 915, 84, 10.3847/1538-4357/abff4a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abff4a 2021

  33. [34]

    2015, , 798, 6, 10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/6

    Fukui , Y., Torii , K., Onishi , T., et al. 2015, , 798, 6, 10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/6

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/798/1/6 2015

  34. [35]

    2012, , 746, 82, 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/82

    Fukui , Y., Sano , H., Sato , J., et al. 2012, , 746, 82, 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/82

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/746/1/82 2012

  35. [36]

    2017, , 850, 71, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9219

    ---. 2017, , 850, 71, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9219

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9219 2017

  36. [37]

    R., Ohama , A., et al

    Furukawa , N., Dawson , J. R., Ohama , A., et al. 2009, , 696, L115, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/L115

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/696/2/l115 2009

  37. [38]

    21cmfast: a fast, seminumerical simulation of the high-redshift 21-cm signal: 21cmfast , volume=

    Gennaro , M., Brandner , W., Stolte , A., & Henning , T. 2011, , 412, 2469, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18068.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18068.x 2011

  38. [39]

    2011, , 742, L30, 10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/L30

    Giuliani , A., Cardillo , M., Tavani , M., et al. 2011, , 742, L30, 10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/L30

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/l30 2011

  39. [40]

    D., Camilo , F., et al

    Goedhart , S., Cotton , W. D., Camilo , F., et al. 2024, , 531, 649, 10.1093/mnras/stae1166

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1166 2024

  40. [41]

    G., Almendros-Abad , V., Lovell , J

    Guarcello , M. G., Almendros-Abad , V., Lovell , J. B., et al. 2025, , 693, A120, 10.1051/0004-6361/202452150

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452150 2025

  41. [42]

    H. E. S. S. Collaboration , Abramowski , A., Aharonian , F., et al. 2015, Science, 347, 406, 10.1126/science.1261313

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1261313 2015

  42. [43]

    K., Reville , B., Hinton , J., Mohrmann , L., & Vieu , T

    H \"a rer , L. K., Reville , B., Hinton , J., Mohrmann , L., & Vieu , T. 2023, , 671, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245444

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245444 2023

  43. [44]

    2025, , 695, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451964

    Haubner , K., Sasaki , M., Mitchell , A., et al. 2025, , 695, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451964

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451964 2025

  44. [45]

    2018, , 70, S53, 10.1093/pasj/psx089

    Inoue , T., Hennebelle , P., Fukui , Y., et al. 2018, , 70, S53, 10.1093/pasj/psx089

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psx089 2018

  45. [46]

    2022, , 659, A36, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142575

    Kabanovic , S., Schneider , N., Ossenkopf-Okada , V., et al. 2022, , 659, A36, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142575

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142575 2022

  46. [47]

    G., Ptuskin , V

    Klepach , E. G., Ptuskin , V. S., & Zirakashvili , V. N. 2000, Astroparticle Physics, 13, 161, 10.1016/S0927-6505(99)00108-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0927-6505(99)00108-5 2000

  47. [48]

    Kothes , R., & Dougherty , S. M. 2007, , 468, 993, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077309

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077309 2007

  48. [49]

    Landsman , W. B. 1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 52, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II, ed. R. J. Hanisch , R. J. V. Brissenden , & J. Barnes , 246

    1993

  49. [50]

    D., Carrasco , L., & Bronfman , L

    Luna , A., Mayya , Y. D., Carrasco , L., & Bronfman , L. 2010, , 713, L45, 10.1088/2041-8205/713/1/L45

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/713/1/l45 2010

  50. [51]

    M., Dickey , J

    McClure-Griffiths , N. M., Dickey , J. M., Gaensler , B. M., et al. 2005, , 158, 178, 10.1086/430114

    work page doi:10.1086/430114 2005

  51. [52]

    2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Mizuno , A., & Fukui , Y. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 317, Milky Way Surveys: The Structure and Evolution of our Galaxy, ed. D. Clemens , R. Shah , & T. Brainerd , 59

    2004

  52. [53]

    1979, , 231, 95, 10.1086/157166

    Montmerle , T. 1979, , 231, 95, 10.1086/157166

    work page doi:10.1086/157166 1979

  53. [54]

    P., Clark , J

    Muno , M. P., Clark , J. S., Crowther , P. A., et al. 2006, , 636, L41, 10.1086/499776

    work page doi:10.1086/499776 2006

  54. [55]

    E., Rocha , D

    Navarete , F., Damineli , A., Ramirez , A. E., Rocha , D. F., & Almeida , L. A. 2022, , 516, 1289, 10.1093/mnras/stac2374

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2374 2022

  55. [56]

    J., Dorda , R., et al

    Negueruela , I., Alfaro , E. J., Dorda , R., et al. 2022, , 664, A146, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142985

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142985 2022

  56. [57]

    S., & Ritchie , B

    Negueruela , I., Clark , J. S., & Ritchie , B. W. 2010, , 516, A78, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014032

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014032 2010

  57. [58]

    R., Furukawa , N., et al

    Ohama , A., Dawson , J. R., Furukawa , N., et al. 2010, , 709, 975, 10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/975

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/709/2/975 2010

  58. [59]

    A., & White , R

    Ohm , S., Hinton , J. A., & White , R. 2013, , 434, 2289, 10.1093/mnras/stt1170

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1170 2013

  59. [60]

    2017, , 838, 132, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6747

    Okamoto , R., Yamamoto , H., Tachihara , K., et al. 2017, , 838, 132, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6747

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6747 2017

  60. [61]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 530, 10.1038/s41550-023-02168-6

    Peron , G., Casanova , S., Gabici , S., Baghmanyan , V., & Aharonian , F. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 530, 10.1038/s41550-023-02168-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02168-6 2024

  61. [62]

    Planck Collaboration , Abergel , A., Ade , P. A. R., et al. 2014, , 571, A11, 10.1051/0004-6361/201323195

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323195 2014

  62. [63]

    A., & Parker , R

    Rate , G., Crowther , P. A., & Parker , R. J. 2020, , 495, 1209, 10.1093/mnras/staa1290

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1290 2020

  63. [64]

    A., Di Francesco , J., Kirk , H., et al

    Ridge , N. A., Di Francesco , J., Kirk , H., et al. 2006, , 131, 2921, 10.1086/503704

    work page doi:10.1086/503704 2006

  64. [65]

    G., Polychroni , D., et al

    Roy , A., Martin , P. G., Polychroni , D., et al. 2013, , 763, 55, 10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/55

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/1/55 2013

  65. [66]

    2003, , 397, 133, 10.1051/0004-6361:20021504

    Russeil , D. 2003, , 397, 133, 10.1051/0004-6361:20021504

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021504 2003

  66. [67]

    2022, , 933, 157, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7465

    Sano , H., Yamaguchi , H., Aruga , M., et al. 2022, , 933, 157, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7465

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7465 2022

  67. [68]

    M., Mitsuishi , I., et al

    Sano , H., Reynoso , E. M., Mitsuishi , I., et al. 2017, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 15, 1, 10.1016/j.jheap.2017.04.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2017.04.002 2017

  68. [69]

    M., et al

    Sano , H., Rowell , G., Reynoso , E. M., et al. 2019, , 876, 37, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab108f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab108f 2019

  69. [70]

    1978, , 83, 1607, 10.1086/112370

    Sato , F., & Fukui , Y. 1978, , 83, 1607, 10.1086/112370

    work page doi:10.1086/112370 1978

  70. [71]

    A retrospective view of Miriad

    Sault , R. J., Teuben , P. J., & Wright , M. C. H. 1995, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 77, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, ed. R. A. Shaw , H. E. Payne , & J. J. E. Hayes , 433, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0612759

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0612759 1995

  71. [72]

    2026, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 51, 100560, 10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100560

    Shi , Z., & Yang , R.-Z. 2026, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 51, 100560, 10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100560

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100560 2026

  72. [73]

    21cmfast: a fast, seminumerical simulation of the high-redshift 21-cm signal: 21cmfast , volume=

    Williams , M. J., Bureau , M., & Cappellari , M. 2010, , 409, 1330, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17406.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17406.x 2010

  73. [74]

    2017, , 600, A107, 10.1051/0004-6361/201630213

    Yang , R.-z., & Aharonian , F. 2017, , 600, A107, 10.1051/0004-6361/201630213

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630213 2017

  74. [75]

    2019, Rendiconti Lincei

    Yang , R.-z., Aharonian , F., & de O \ n a Wilhelmi , E. 2019, Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali, 30, 159, 10.1007/s12210-019-00819-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s12210-019-00819-3 2019