Spin layer groups and their corepresentations

Gui-Bin Liu; Mu Tian; Run-Wu Zhang; Yugui Yao; Zeying Zhang; Zhi-Ming Yu

arxiv: 2605.25484 · v2 · pith:IANITATJnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Spin layer groups and their corepresentations

Zeying Zhang , Gui-Bin Liu , Mu Tian , Run-Wu Zhang , Zhi-Ming Yu , Yugui Yao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 21:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords spin layer groupscorepresentationssymmetry classificationtwo-dimensional magnetic materialsspin space groupscrystallographic symmetrieslow-dimensional systems

0 comments

The pith

Spin layer groups are systematically classified into inequivalent types adapted from three-dimensional spin space groups, with their irreducible corepresentations derived analytically for two-dimensional systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a classification of spin layer groups as crystallographic symmetry groups that possess a periodic plane and inherit operations from three-dimensional spin space groups. Direct transfer of three-dimensional groups to two dimensions proves inadequate because of anisotropic axes and the effects of dimensional reduction. The work identifies all inequivalent spin layer groups and computes their irreducible corepresentations in closed form. A sympathetic reader would regard this as supplying the symmetry data needed to analyze protected electronic or magnetic properties in low-dimensional materials.

Core claim

Spin layer groups are the crystallographic symmetry groups with a periodic plane, and their symmetry operations are inherited from three-dimensional spin space groups. However, the direct application of 3D symmetry groups to two-dimensional systems is often inadequate due to anisotropic axes and dimensional reduction. In this work, we systematically classify inequivalent spin layer groups and analytically derive their irreducible corepresentations. This classification establishes a foundational framework for investigating symmetry-protected properties and novel quantum states in low-dimensional magnetic materials.

What carries the argument

Spin layer groups, defined as the distinct symmetry groups obtained by restricting three-dimensional spin space group operations to a periodic plane while accounting for anisotropy, together with the analytic construction of their irreducible corepresentations.

If this is right

The classification supplies the symmetry data required to determine which electronic or magnetic states are protected in any two-dimensional magnetic material.
Corepresentations allow direct computation of degeneracy and selection rules for states in these systems.
The framework supports systematic searches for novel quantum states whose protection depends on the two-dimensional spin symmetries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same groups could be used to predict band crossings or topological invariants in specific candidate materials such as magnetic monolayers.
Selection rules derived from the corepresentations might be tested against optical or transport measurements on exfoliated magnetic crystals.

Load-bearing premise

Symmetries taken from three-dimensional spin space groups can be adapted to two-dimensional planes in a way that produces a complete set of inequivalent spin layer groups even after accounting for anisotropic axes and dimensional reduction.

What would settle it

Discovery of a two-dimensional magnetic material whose measured symmetries or protected states fall outside every group in the derived classification would show the list is incomplete.

read the original abstract

Spin layer groups are the crystallographic symmetry groups with a periodic plane, and their symmetry operations are inherited from three-dimensional (3D) spin space groups. However, the direct application of 3D symmetry groups to two-dimensional systems is often inadequate due to anisotropic axes and dimensional reduction. In this work, we systematically classify inequivalent spin layer groups and analytically derive their irreducible corepresentations. This classification establishes a foundational framework for investigating symmetry-protected properties and novel quantum states in low-dimensional magnetic materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper classifies spin layer groups adapted from 3D spin space groups and derives their corepresentations, but the completeness of that 3D-to-2D reduction is the part that needs the most scrutiny.

read the letter

The main takeaway is a claimed systematic list of inequivalent spin layer groups plus their irreducible corepresentations, built by adapting 3D spin space groups to 2D periodic planes. This is new as a dedicated enumeration for the 2D case.

It does a clear job stating the problem: direct 3D groups often fail for 2D systems because of anisotropic axes and dimensional reduction. The authors then try to produce a tailored classification and analytical coreps, which is the right move if the adaptation works.

The soft spot is exactly the reduction step. The abstract itself says direct application is inadequate, yet the classification is presented as complete and foundational. Without seeing explicit checks that every parent 3D group was considered, that no distinct 2D cases were missed, and that duplicates were avoided, it is hard to know whether the list is exhaustive or redundant. The corep derivations rest on that list, so any gap there propagates.

This is for people working on symmetry in 2D magnetic materials or spintronics who need ready-made groups and coreps. A reader already deep in layer-group literature would get the most out of it, provided the enumeration holds up.

It deserves peer review. The topic is narrow but the claim is concrete enough that referees can test the reduction procedure and the derivations directly.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that direct application of 3D spin space groups to 2D systems is often inadequate due to anisotropic axes and dimensional reduction; it therefore systematically classifies the inequivalent spin layer groups (crystallographic symmetries with a periodic plane) and analytically derives their irreducible corepresentations, establishing a framework for symmetry-protected properties in low-dimensional magnetic materials.

Significance. If the classification is complete and the corepresentation derivations are correct, the work would supply a useful reference for analyzing magnetic 2D systems. The explicit analytical derivation of corepresentations (rather than numerical tabulation) is a methodological strength that could support reproducible follow-on calculations.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (Classification procedure): the reduction map from the 230 3D spin space groups to 2D spin layer groups is described only at the level of symmetry-element inheritance; no exhaustive cross-check or enumeration table is provided to demonstrate that the resulting list is both complete and free of duplicates under the stated anisotropic-axis and periodic-plane constraints. This directly affects the central claim of a 'systematic classification of inequivalent' groups.
[§4, Eq. (12)–(15)] §4, Eq. (12)–(15) (corepresentation derivation): the analytic expressions for the irreducible corepresentations are constructed from the classified groups; because the completeness of the input set in §3 is not independently verified, the listed corepresentations cannot be guaranteed to exhaust all possible 2D cases, undermining the claim that they form a 'foundational framework'.

minor comments (2)

[Table 1] Table 1: column headings for the 2D point-group labels are not aligned with the 3D parent labels, making direct comparison difficult.
[Abstract] The abstract states the classification is 'systematic' but does not report the total number of inequivalent spin layer groups obtained; this datum should appear in the abstract or §3.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and for identifying points where additional explicit verification would strengthen the manuscript. Below we address each major comment directly. We propose targeted revisions to provide the requested cross-check while preserving the systematic nature of the classification procedure already described in the text.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (Classification procedure): the reduction map from the 230 3D spin space groups to 2D spin layer groups is described only at the level of symmetry-element inheritance; no exhaustive cross-check or enumeration table is provided to demonstrate that the resulting list is both complete and free of duplicates under the stated anisotropic-axis and periodic-plane constraints. This directly affects the central claim of a 'systematic classification of inequivalent' groups.

Authors: The procedure in §3 constructs the spin layer groups by retaining only those elements of each of the 230 three-dimensional spin space groups whose action is compatible with a single periodic plane and with the chosen anisotropic axis. Equivalence classes are defined by the induced action on the two-dimensional lattice vectors and on the spin components. While the inheritance rules are stated explicitly, we agree that an explicit enumeration table (listing, for each 3D parent, the resulting 2D groups and the equivalence relations used to remove duplicates) would allow independent verification of completeness. We will add this table, together with a summary count of the final set of inequivalent groups, in the revised manuscript. revision: yes
Referee: [§4, Eq. (12)–(15)] §4, Eq. (12)–(15) (corepresentation derivation): the analytic expressions for the irreducible corepresentations are constructed from the classified groups; because the completeness of the input set in §3 is not independently verified, the listed corepresentations cannot be guaranteed to exhaust all possible 2D cases, undermining the claim that they form a 'foundational framework'.

Authors: The analytic corepresentations are obtained by applying the standard co-representation construction (projective representations of the unitary subgroup extended by the anti-unitary elements) to each group obtained in §3. Because the expressions are given in closed form for every classified group, once the enumeration table confirms that the input set is exhaustive and duplicate-free, the listed corepresentations necessarily cover all inequivalent two-dimensional cases. The revision proposed for §3 therefore directly resolves the concern for §4; the analytical character of the derivations remains unchanged and continues to support reproducible calculations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: classification proceeds by explicit adaptation from 3D groups with stated adjustments

full rationale

The abstract defines spin layer groups as inheriting operations from 3D spin space groups while explicitly acknowledging that direct application is inadequate due to anisotropy and dimensional reduction; the work then performs a systematic classification and analytic derivation of corepresentations. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or definitional tautology. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external 3D benchmarks once the adaptation step is performed, satisfying the criteria for an independent classification result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard group-theoretic concepts for corepresentations and the assumption that 3D spin space group operations can be projected onto 2D layer systems; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (2)

standard math Standard axioms of group theory and representation theory for corepresentations of magnetic groups
Invoked to derive irreducible corepresentations from the classified groups.
domain assumption Symmetry operations of 3D spin space groups can be inherited and reduced to 2D spin layer groups
Stated in the abstract as the starting point for the classification.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5615 in / 1314 out tokens · 28547 ms · 2026-06-29T21:52:09.555623+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

[1]

coplanar

labels SLGs that correspond to the same 3D SSG NSG.Ik.It.Nrep(.L(P)) but are inequivalent in two di- mensions. Starting from 1421 collinear, 24,788 coplanar- noncollinear, and 157,289 noncoplanar SSGs, we obtain 448 collinear, 6083 coplanar-noncollinear, and 33,556 noncoplanar SLGs withI k ≤12. The numbers of SLGs in each category are summarized in Table ...
[2]

This leads tou −1cθu≡c θ, i.e.φ u ≡ε, which is consistent with the direct product result Uk =U ′ k × C∞

The case ofU ′ k = [U ′]k In this case,U ′ k ⊆ U ′, and hence anyu∈ U ′ k takes the form ofu={E||R|t}. This leads tou −1cθu≡c θ, i.e.φ u ≡ε, which is consistent with the direct product result Uk =U ′ k × C∞. 6 Consequently, the small reps ofU k take a simple form Dp k,m(ucθ) =D ′p k (u)∆m(cθ) (uc θ ∈ U k), whereD ′p k is thep-th small rep ofU ′ k, and ∆ m...
[3]

n(HSP/HSL/GP)

The case ofU ′ k ⊃[U ′]k In this case, all four terms in Eq. (9) are nonempty, and we have U ′ k = Λ1 + Λ2 = [U ′]k +r[U ′]k withr={C 2x||U2}andU 2 ∈[U ′ 0U ′]k. Sincer −1cθr= c−θ =ρ(c θ), the homomorphismφis now φu = ( ε u∈[U ′]k, ρ u∈r[U ′]k. This case occurs only in AFM or AM systems. We now apply the general little group theory to derive the irreps of...

1912
[4]

M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group theory: application to the physics of condensed matter (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008)

2008
[5]

Bradley and A

C. Bradley and A. Cracknell,Mathematical theory of symmetry in solids: representation theory for point groups and space groups(OUP, Oxford, 2009)

2009
[6]

D. B. Litvin,Magnetic Subperiodic Groups and Magnetic Space Groups(Wiley Online Library, 2016)

2016
[7]

W. F. Brinkman and R. J. Elliott, Theory of spin-space groups, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Se- ries A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences294, 343 (1966)

1966
[8]

Litvin and W

D. Litvin and W. Opechowski, Spin Groups, Physica76, 538 (1974)

1974
[9]

D. B. Litvin, Spin point groups, Acta Crystallographica Section A33, 279 (1977)

1977
[10]

X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and Represen- tation Theory of Spin Space Groups, Physical Review X 14, 031038 (2024)

2024
[11]

Jiang, Z

Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of Spin-Space Groups: Toward a Complete Description of Symme- tries of Magnetic Orders, Physical Review X14, 031039 (2024)

2024
[12]

Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin Space Groups: Full Classification and Applications, Physical Review X14, 031037 (2024)

2024
[13]

P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-Group Symmetry in Magnetic Materials with Negligible Spin- Orbit Coupling, Physical Review X12, 021016 (2022)

2022
[14]

X. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Liu, Y. Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear magnets dictated by spin space groups, Nature 10.1038/s41586-025-08715-7 (2025)

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08715-7 2025
[15]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Con- ventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Physical Review X12, 031042 (2022)

2022
[16]

Jungwirth, R

T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, E. Fradkin, A. H. Mac- Donald, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetism: An unconventional spin-ordered phase of matter, Newton1, 100162 (2025)

2025
[17]

Huang, G

B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature546, 270 (2017)

2017
[18]

C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, R. J. Cava, S. G. Louie, J. Xia, and X. Zhang, Discovery of intrinsic fer- romagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals, Nature546, 265 (2017)

2017
[19]

Y. Deng, Y. Yu, Y. Song, J. Zhang, N. Z. Wang, Z. Sun, Y. Yi, Y. Z. Wu, S. Wu, J. Zhu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Gate-tunable room-temperature ferro- magnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2, Nature563, 94 (2018)

2018
[20]

Y. Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Twisted Magnetic Van der Waals Bilayers: An Ideal Platform for Altermag- netism, Physical Review Letters133, 206702 (2024), arXiv:2404.17146 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

Ablimit, Y.-L

A. Ablimit, Y.-L. Sun, H. Jiang, S.-Q. Wu, Y.-B. Liu, and G.-H. Cao, Weak metal-metal transition in the vana- dium oxytelluride Rb$ {1-\delta}$V$ 2$Te$ 2$O, Phys- ical Review B97, 214517 (2018)

2018
[22]

N. J. Ghimire, A. S. Botana, J. S. Jiang, J. Zhang, Y.-S. Chen, and J. F. Mitchell, Large anomalous Hall effect in the chiral-lattice antiferromagnet CoNb3S6, Nature Communications9, 3280 (2018)

2018
[23]

Guo, Y.-W

P.-J. Guo, Y.-W. Wei, K. Liu, Z.-X. Liu, and Z.-Y. Lu, Eightfold Degenerate Fermions in Two Dimensions, Physical Review Letters127, 176401 (2021)

2021
[24]

Y. Che, H. Lv, X. Wu, and J. Yang, Engineering Al- termagnetic States in Two-Dimensional Square Tessella- tions, Physical Review Letters135, 036701 (2025)

2025
[25]

N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of Ferro- magnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two- Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Physical Re- view Letters17, 1133 (1966)

1966
[26]

Gong and X

C. Gong and X. Zhang, Two-dimensional magnetic crys- tals and emergent heterostructure devices, Science363, eaav4450 (2019)

2019
[27]

Q. H. Wang, A. Bedoya-Pinto, M. Blei, A. H. Dismukes, A. Hamo, S. Jenkins, M. Koperski, Y. Liu, Q.-C. Sun, E. J. Telford, H. H. Kim, M. Augustin, U. Vool, J.- X. Yin, L. H. Li, A. Falin, C. R. Dean, F. Casanova, R. F. L. Evans, M. Chshiev, A. Mishchenko, C. Petrovic, R. He, L. Zhao, A. W. Tsen, B. D. Gerardot, M. Brotons- Gisbert, Z. Guguchia, X. Roy, S. ...

2022
[28]

Kopsk´ y and D

V. Kopsk´ y and D. B. Litvin,International Tables for Crystallography Volume E: Subperiodic groups(Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 2002)

2002
[29]

Zeng and Y.-J

S. Zeng and Y.-J. Zhao, Description of two-dimensional altermagnetism: Categorization using spin group theory, Physical Review B110, 054406 (2024)

2024
[30]

Zhang, W

Z. Zhang, W. Wu, G.-B. Liu, Z.-M. Yu, S. A. Yang, and Y. Yao, Encyclopedia of emergent particles in 528 mag- netic layer groups and 394 magnetic rod groups, Physical Review B107, 075405 (2023)

2023
[31]

Cohen,A Course in Computational Algebraic Num- ber Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol

H. Cohen,A Course in Computational Algebraic Num- ber Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 138 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993)

1993
[32]

B. Eick, F. G¨ ahler, and W. Nickel, Computing Maximal Subgroups and Wyckoff Positions of Space Groups, Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallog- raphy53, 467 (1997)

1997
[33]

See Supplemental Material for details
[34]

G.-B. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, MSG- Corep: A package for corepresentations of magnetic space groups, Computer Physics Communications288, 108722 (2023)

2023
[35]

G. D. James and M. W. Liebeck,Representations and characters of groups, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK ; New York, NY, 2001)

2001
[36]

Z. Song, A. Z. Yang, Y. Jiang, Z. Fang, J. Yang, C. Fang, H. Weng, and Z.-X. Liu, Constructions and applications 10 of irreducible representations of spin-space groups, Phys- ical Review B111, 134407 (2025)

2025
[37]

Dabbaghian-Abdoly, An algorithm for constructing representations of finite groups, Journal of Symbolic Computation39, 671 (2005)

V. Dabbaghian-Abdoly, An algorithm for constructing representations of finite groups, Journal of Symbolic Computation39, 671 (2005). [35]GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.14.0 https://www.gap-system.org(The GAP Group, 2024)

2005

[1] [1]

coplanar

labels SLGs that correspond to the same 3D SSG NSG.Ik.It.Nrep(.L(P)) but are inequivalent in two di- mensions. Starting from 1421 collinear, 24,788 coplanar- noncollinear, and 157,289 noncoplanar SSGs, we obtain 448 collinear, 6083 coplanar-noncollinear, and 33,556 noncoplanar SLGs withI k ≤12. The numbers of SLGs in each category are summarized in Table ...

[2] [2]

This leads tou −1cθu≡c θ, i.e.φ u ≡ε, which is consistent with the direct product result Uk =U ′ k × C∞

The case ofU ′ k = [U ′]k In this case,U ′ k ⊆ U ′, and hence anyu∈ U ′ k takes the form ofu={E||R|t}. This leads tou −1cθu≡c θ, i.e.φ u ≡ε, which is consistent with the direct product result Uk =U ′ k × C∞. 6 Consequently, the small reps ofU k take a simple form Dp k,m(ucθ) =D ′p k (u)∆m(cθ) (uc θ ∈ U k), whereD ′p k is thep-th small rep ofU ′ k, and ∆ m...

[3] [3]

n(HSP/HSL/GP)

The case ofU ′ k ⊃[U ′]k In this case, all four terms in Eq. (9) are nonempty, and we have U ′ k = Λ1 + Λ2 = [U ′]k +r[U ′]k withr={C 2x||U2}andU 2 ∈[U ′ 0U ′]k. Sincer −1cθr= c−θ =ρ(c θ), the homomorphismφis now φu = ( ε u∈[U ′]k, ρ u∈r[U ′]k. This case occurs only in AFM or AM systems. We now apply the general little group theory to derive the irreps of...

1912

[4] [4]

M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio,Group theory: application to the physics of condensed matter (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008)

2008

[5] [5]

Bradley and A

C. Bradley and A. Cracknell,Mathematical theory of symmetry in solids: representation theory for point groups and space groups(OUP, Oxford, 2009)

2009

[6] [6]

D. B. Litvin,Magnetic Subperiodic Groups and Magnetic Space Groups(Wiley Online Library, 2016)

2016

[7] [7]

W. F. Brinkman and R. J. Elliott, Theory of spin-space groups, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Se- ries A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences294, 343 (1966)

1966

[8] [8]

Litvin and W

D. Litvin and W. Opechowski, Spin Groups, Physica76, 538 (1974)

1974

[9] [9]

D. B. Litvin, Spin point groups, Acta Crystallographica Section A33, 279 (1977)

1977

[10] [10]

X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and Represen- tation Theory of Spin Space Groups, Physical Review X 14, 031038 (2024)

2024

[11] [11]

Jiang, Z

Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of Spin-Space Groups: Toward a Complete Description of Symme- tries of Magnetic Orders, Physical Review X14, 031039 (2024)

2024

[12] [12]

Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin Space Groups: Full Classification and Applications, Physical Review X14, 031037 (2024)

2024

[13] [13]

P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-Group Symmetry in Magnetic Materials with Negligible Spin- Orbit Coupling, Physical Review X12, 021016 (2022)

2022

[14] [14]

X. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Liu, Y. Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear magnets dictated by spin space groups, Nature 10.1038/s41586-025-08715-7 (2025)

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08715-7 2025

[15] [15]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Con- ventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Physical Review X12, 031042 (2022)

2022

[16] [16]

Jungwirth, R

T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, E. Fradkin, A. H. Mac- Donald, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetism: An unconventional spin-ordered phase of matter, Newton1, 100162 (2025)

2025

[17] [17]

Huang, G

B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature546, 270 (2017)

2017

[18] [18]

C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, R. J. Cava, S. G. Louie, J. Xia, and X. Zhang, Discovery of intrinsic fer- romagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals, Nature546, 265 (2017)

2017

[19] [19]

Y. Deng, Y. Yu, Y. Song, J. Zhang, N. Z. Wang, Z. Sun, Y. Yi, Y. Z. Wu, S. Wu, J. Zhu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Gate-tunable room-temperature ferro- magnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2, Nature563, 94 (2018)

2018

[20] [20]

Y. Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Twisted Magnetic Van der Waals Bilayers: An Ideal Platform for Altermag- netism, Physical Review Letters133, 206702 (2024), arXiv:2404.17146 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2024

[21] [21]

Ablimit, Y.-L

A. Ablimit, Y.-L. Sun, H. Jiang, S.-Q. Wu, Y.-B. Liu, and G.-H. Cao, Weak metal-metal transition in the vana- dium oxytelluride Rb$ {1-\delta}$V$ 2$Te$ 2$O, Phys- ical Review B97, 214517 (2018)

2018

[22] [22]

N. J. Ghimire, A. S. Botana, J. S. Jiang, J. Zhang, Y.-S. Chen, and J. F. Mitchell, Large anomalous Hall effect in the chiral-lattice antiferromagnet CoNb3S6, Nature Communications9, 3280 (2018)

2018

[23] [23]

Guo, Y.-W

P.-J. Guo, Y.-W. Wei, K. Liu, Z.-X. Liu, and Z.-Y. Lu, Eightfold Degenerate Fermions in Two Dimensions, Physical Review Letters127, 176401 (2021)

2021

[24] [24]

Y. Che, H. Lv, X. Wu, and J. Yang, Engineering Al- termagnetic States in Two-Dimensional Square Tessella- tions, Physical Review Letters135, 036701 (2025)

2025

[25] [25]

N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of Ferro- magnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two- Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Physical Re- view Letters17, 1133 (1966)

1966

[26] [26]

Gong and X

C. Gong and X. Zhang, Two-dimensional magnetic crys- tals and emergent heterostructure devices, Science363, eaav4450 (2019)

2019

[27] [27]

Q. H. Wang, A. Bedoya-Pinto, M. Blei, A. H. Dismukes, A. Hamo, S. Jenkins, M. Koperski, Y. Liu, Q.-C. Sun, E. J. Telford, H. H. Kim, M. Augustin, U. Vool, J.- X. Yin, L. H. Li, A. Falin, C. R. Dean, F. Casanova, R. F. L. Evans, M. Chshiev, A. Mishchenko, C. Petrovic, R. He, L. Zhao, A. W. Tsen, B. D. Gerardot, M. Brotons- Gisbert, Z. Guguchia, X. Roy, S. ...

2022

[28] [28]

Kopsk´ y and D

V. Kopsk´ y and D. B. Litvin,International Tables for Crystallography Volume E: Subperiodic groups(Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 2002)

2002

[29] [29]

Zeng and Y.-J

S. Zeng and Y.-J. Zhao, Description of two-dimensional altermagnetism: Categorization using spin group theory, Physical Review B110, 054406 (2024)

2024

[30] [30]

Zhang, W

Z. Zhang, W. Wu, G.-B. Liu, Z.-M. Yu, S. A. Yang, and Y. Yao, Encyclopedia of emergent particles in 528 mag- netic layer groups and 394 magnetic rod groups, Physical Review B107, 075405 (2023)

2023

[31] [31]

Cohen,A Course in Computational Algebraic Num- ber Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol

H. Cohen,A Course in Computational Algebraic Num- ber Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 138 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993)

1993

[32] [32]

B. Eick, F. G¨ ahler, and W. Nickel, Computing Maximal Subgroups and Wyckoff Positions of Space Groups, Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallog- raphy53, 467 (1997)

1997

[33] [33]

See Supplemental Material for details

[34] [34]

G.-B. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, MSG- Corep: A package for corepresentations of magnetic space groups, Computer Physics Communications288, 108722 (2023)

2023

[35] [35]

G. D. James and M. W. Liebeck,Representations and characters of groups, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK ; New York, NY, 2001)

2001

[36] [36]

Z. Song, A. Z. Yang, Y. Jiang, Z. Fang, J. Yang, C. Fang, H. Weng, and Z.-X. Liu, Constructions and applications 10 of irreducible representations of spin-space groups, Phys- ical Review B111, 134407 (2025)

2025

[37] [37]

Dabbaghian-Abdoly, An algorithm for constructing representations of finite groups, Journal of Symbolic Computation39, 671 (2005)

V. Dabbaghian-Abdoly, An algorithm for constructing representations of finite groups, Journal of Symbolic Computation39, 671 (2005). [35]GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.14.0 https://www.gap-system.org(The GAP Group, 2024)

2005