pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25982 · v1 · pith:ZEAYWJFTnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Light-Induced Transient Polarization Reversal in Rhombohedrally Stacked Bilayer Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides via an Electronic Mechanism

Xiangzhou Zhu , Stefano Mocatti , Matteo Calandra This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 21:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ultrafast polarization reversalrhombohedral bilayer TMDselectronic ferroelectric switchingtype II band alignmentphotoinduced dipole rearrangementvan der Waals ferroelectricssub-picosecond memory
0
0 comments X

The pith

An electronic mechanism reverses out-of-plane polarization in rhombohedral bilayer TMDs within 200 fs without interlayer sliding.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that light can flip the sign of out-of-plane polarization in rhombohedrally stacked bilayer transition-metal dichalcogenides through a purely electronic process. This reversal occurs at moderate fluences and within 200 fs, far faster than the tens of picoseconds required for layer-sliding mechanisms. A sympathetic reader would care because the effect points to electronic-speed control of ferroelectric order in two-dimensional materials. Simulations trace the sign change to a rearrangement of localized dipoles near the tungsten atoms and argue that the same process operates in any polar multilayer with type-II band alignment.

Core claim

Using constrained density functional theory and many-body real-time simulations, we demonstrate an ultrafast electronic reversal of the total out-of-plane polarization sign in the photoexcited state, without requiring interlayer sliding, in rhombohedrally stacked transition-metal dichalcogenide bilayers. The polarization changes sign relative to its initial ground-state value at moderate fluences and within 200 fs, about 50 times faster than the typical shear-mode period. The ultrafast switching is driven by a rearrangement of localized dipoles around the tungsten sites. We establish a novel general mechanism for electronic control of low-dimensional ferroelectrics common to all polar multil

What carries the argument

rearrangement of localized dipoles around the tungsten sites that reverses the total out-of-plane polarization in the photoexcited state

If this is right

  • Polarization sign reverses in the photoexcited state at moderate fluences without any interlayer sliding.
  • The reversal completes within 200 fs, roughly 50 times faster than the shear-mode period.
  • The same electronic mechanism applies to every polar multilayer with type-II band alignment.
  • The process supports ultrahigh-speed volatile optical memory on sub-picosecond time scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Time-resolved second-harmonic generation could directly track the polarization sign flip on the femtosecond scale.
  • The dipole-rearrangement route may extend to other van der Waals stacks that share type-II alignment even if they lack rhombohedral stacking.
  • Varying the pump photon energy could selectively excite the bands responsible for the dipole shift and thereby tune the reversal threshold.

Load-bearing premise

The simulations isolate a purely electronic reversal driven by dipole rearrangement around tungsten sites with no contribution from interlayer motion.

What would settle it

Time-resolved measurements that show either no polarization sign change or measurable interlayer displacement within the first 200 fs after excitation at the reported fluences.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25982 by Matteo Calandra, Stefano Mocatti, Xiangzhou Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Band structure of WSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Time evolution of the polarization for final photoex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Charge transfer as the function of out-of-plane dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Light-induced sliding ferroelectricity in two-dimensional van der Waals materials enables polarization control via relative layer motion. However, polarization switching occurs on the time scale of shear modes (tens of ps) and requires very large fluences, potentially damaging the samples. Here, using constrained density functional theory and many-body real-time simulations, we demonstrate an ultrafast electronic reversal of the total out-of-plane polarization sign in the photoexcited state, without requiring interlayer sliding, in rhombohedrally stacked transition-metal dichalcogenide bilayers. The polarization changes sign relative to its initial ground-state value at moderate fluences and within 200 fs, about 50 times faster than the typical shear-mode period. The ultrafast switching is driven by a rearrangement of localized dipoles around the tungsten sites. We establish a novel general mechanism for electronic control of low-dimensional ferroelectrics common to all polar multilayers having type II band alignment. Our work has direct implications for ultrahigh-speed volatile optical memory operating on sub-ps time scales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses constrained density functional theory and many-body real-time simulations at fixed ionic positions to demonstrate an ultrafast electronic reversal of the sign of the total out-of-plane polarization in photoexcited rhombohedrally stacked bilayer transition-metal dichalcogenides. The reversal occurs within 200 fs at moderate fluences without interlayer sliding and is attributed to a rearrangement of localized dipoles around the tungsten sites; the authors propose this as a general mechanism applicable to all polar multilayers possessing type-II band alignment, with implications for sub-ps volatile optical memory.

Significance. If the simulations are robust, the work identifies a purely electronic pathway to polarization sign reversal that is approximately 50 times faster than typical shear-mode sliding and operates at lower fluences, offering a distinct route to ultrafast control of 2D ferroelectrics. The fixed-geometry real-time many-body approach is an appropriate and standard tool for isolating electronic dynamics, and the identification of the W-centered dipole rearrangement provides a concrete microscopic picture. The claimed generality to type-II systems is a potentially high-impact extension if supported by additional analysis.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of a sign reversal of the total out-of-plane polarization at moderate fluences within 200 fs is load-bearing, yet the abstract (and the information available for review) provides no quantitative values for the fluence, the magnitude of the polarization change, or error estimates from the real-time simulations; these data are required to assess whether the reported reversal is substantial and reproducible.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the mechanism is 'common to all polar multilayers having type II band alignment' is a strong generalization from the specific TMD bilayer results; the manuscript must supply either an explicit argument based on band alignment and dipole symmetry or at least one additional material example to substantiate the universality claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. The manuscript should define how the total out-of-plane polarization is computed from the electronic density in the constrained-DFT and real-time simulations, including any reference to the modern theory of polarization or equivalent method.
  2. Ensure that the time scale of 200 fs is directly compared to the shear-mode period in the same system or a closely related one, with a citation to the relevant phonon calculation or literature value.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on the abstract. We address each major point below, indicating where revisions have been made to strengthen the presentation of quantitative results and the generality argument.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of a sign reversal of the total out-of-plane polarization at moderate fluences within 200 fs is load-bearing, yet the abstract (and the information available for review) provides no quantitative values for the fluence, the magnitude of the polarization change, or error estimates from the real-time simulations; these data are required to assess whether the reported reversal is substantial and reproducible.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should contain these quantitative details to support the central claim. The main text, figures, and supplementary information already report the relevant fluence range, the magnitude of the polarization reversal, and error estimates from the real-time many-body simulations. We have revised the abstract to include these values directly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the mechanism is 'common to all polar multilayers having type II band alignment' is a strong generalization from the specific TMD bilayer results; the manuscript must supply either an explicit argument based on band alignment and dipole symmetry or at least one additional material example to substantiate the universality claim.

    Authors: The manuscript derives the generality from the type-II band alignment, which produces interlayer charge transfer upon photoexcitation and thereby drives a symmetry-allowed rearrangement of metal-centered dipoles; this electronic mechanism follows from shared features of band alignment and local dipole symmetry rather than material-specific details. We have expanded the explicit argument in the revised discussion section to make the reasoning more prominent while retaining the focus on the TMD results. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained via standard simulations

full rationale

The paper obtains its central claim (ultrafast electronic polarization sign reversal at fixed ionic positions) from constrained DFT plus real-time many-body simulations. These are independent computational methods that do not reduce the reported sign change to a parameter defined by the result itself, nor do they rely on self-citations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work. The type-II band alignment argument for generality is presented as a consequence of the electronic structure rather than a definitional loop. No load-bearing step collapses by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard DFT approximations and the domain assumption of type-II band alignment; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard approximations of density functional theory (exchange-correlation functional, pseudopotentials) are sufficient to describe the photoexcited electronic structure.
    Constrained DFT and many-body real-time simulations are the stated methods; these inherit the usual DFT limitations.
  • domain assumption The bilayers possess type-II band alignment.
    The abstract states that the mechanism is 'common to all polar multilayers having type II band alignment.'

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5725 in / 1574 out tokens · 38261 ms · 2026-06-29T21:23:23.735218+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Arimoto and H

    Y. Arimoto and H. Ishiwara, MRS Bull.29, 823 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    J. F. Scott, Science315, 954 (2007)

    2007

  3. [3]

    A. I. Khan, A. Keshavarzi, and S. Datta, Nat Electron 3, 588 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    I. P. Batra and B. D. Silverman, Solid State Communi- cations11, 291 (1972)

    1972

  5. [5]

    R. R. Mehta, B. D. Silverman, and J. T. Jacobs, J. Appl. Phys.44, 3379 (1973)

    1973

  6. [6]

    W. J. Merz, Phys. Rev.95, 690 (1954)

    1954

  7. [7]

    C. T. Nelson, P. Gao, J. R. Jokisaari, C. Heikes, C. Adamo, A. Melville, S.-H. Baek, C. M. Folkman, B. Winchester, Y. Gu, Y. Liu, K. Zhang, E. Wang, J. Li, L.-Q. Chen, C.-B. Eom, D. G. Schlom, and X. Pan, Sci- ence334, 968 (2011)

    2011

  8. [8]

    Zhang, P

    D. Zhang, P. Schoenherr, P. Sharma, and J. Seidel, Nat Rev Mater8, 25 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    C. Wang, L. You, D. Cobden, and J. Wang, Nat. Mater. 22, 542 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    S. Li, F. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Yang, X. Wang, X. Zhan, J. He, and Z. Wang, Adv. Mater.36, 2301472 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Li and M

    L. Li and M. Wu, ACS Nano11, 6382 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    Wu and J

    M. Wu and J. Li, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.118, e2115703118 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    C. Wang, Y. Zhang, D. Zhang, Y. Sun, T. Zhang, and J. Li, Small21, 2408375 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Z. Fei, W. Zhao, T. A. Palomaki, B. Sun, M. K. Miller, Z. Zhao, J. Yan, X. Xu, and D. H. Cobden, Nature560, 336 (2018)

    2018

  15. [15]

    Vizner Stern, Y

    M. Vizner Stern, Y. Waschitz, W. Cao, I. Nevo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Sela, M. Urbakh, O. Hod, and M. Ben Shalom, Science372, 1462 (2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    Yasuda, X

    K. Yasuda, X. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Science372, 1458 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    X. Wang, K. Yasuda, Y. Zhang, S. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, L. Fu, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 367 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    S. Deb, W. Cao, N. Raab, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Goldstein, L. Kronik, M. Urbakh, O. Hod, and M. Ben Shalom, Nature612, 465 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Weston, E

    A. Weston, E. G. Castanon, V. Enaldiev, F. Ferreira, S. Bhattacharjee, S. Xu, H. Corte-Le´ on, Z. Wu, N. Clark, A. Summerfield, T. Hashimoto, Y. Gao, W. Wang, M. Hamer, H. Read, L. Fumagalli, A. V. Kretinin, S. J. Haigh, O. Kazakova, A. K. Geim, V. I. Fal’ko, and R. Gorbachev, Nat. Nanotechnol.17, 390 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    Yasuda, E

    K. Yasuda, E. Zalys-Geller, X. Wang, D. Bennett, S. S. Cheema, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxi- ras, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and R. Ashoori, Science385, 53 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    T. H. Yang, B.-W. Liang, H.-C. Hu, F.-X. Chen, S.-Z. Ho, W.-H. Chang, L. Yang, H.-C. Lo, T.-H. Kuo, J.- H. Chen, P.-Y. Lin, K. B. Simbulan, Z.-F. Luo, A. C. Chang, Y.-H. Kuo, Y.-S. Ku, Y.-C. Chen, Y.-J. Huang, Y.-C. Chang, Y.-F. Chiang, T.-H. Lu, M.-H. Lee, K.-S. Li, M. Wu, Y.-C. Chen, C.-L. Lin, and Y.-W. Lan, Nat Electron7, 29 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    X. Li, B. Qin, Y. Wang, Y. Xi, Z. Huang, M. Zhao, Y. Peng, Z. Chen, Z. Pan, J. Zhu, C. Cui, R. Yang, W. Yang, S. Meng, D. Shi, X. Bai, C. Liu, N. Li, J. Tang, K. Liu, L. Du, and G. Zhang, Nat Commun15, 10921 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    R. Chen, F. Meng, H. Zhang, Y. Liu, S. Yan, X. Xu, L. Zhu, J. Chen, T. Zhou, J. Zhou, F. Yang, P. Ci, X. Huang, X. Chen, T. Zhang, Y. Cai, K. Dong, Y. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C.-C. Lin, A. V. Penu- matcha, I. Young, E. Chan, J. Wu, L. Yang, R. Ramesh, and J. Yao, Nat Commun16, 3648 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Y. Wan, T. Hu, X. Mao, J. Fu, K. Yuan, Y. Song, X. Gan, X. Xu, M. Xue, X. Cheng, C. Huang, J. Yang, L. Dai, H. Zeng, and E. Kan, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 067601 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    Y. Gao, A. Weston, V. Enaldiev, X. Li, W. Wang, J. E. Nunn, I. Soltero, E. G. Castanon, A. Carl, H. De Latour, A. Summerfield, M. Hamer, J. Howarth, N. Clark, N. R. Wilson, A. V. Kretinin, V. I. Fal’ko, and R. Gorbachev, Nat Commun15, 4449 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    H. Zhao, J. Yun, Y. Ma, W. Tan, Z. Li, T. Yang, J. Yan, L. Zheng, P. Kang, W. Zhao, and Z. Zhang, Adv Funct Materials , e20432 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    C. Bao, P. Tang, D. Sun, and S. Zhou, Nat Rev Phys4, 33 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    Yang and S

    Q. Yang and S. Meng, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 136902 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Gao and L

    L. Gao and L. Bellaiche, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 196801 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    J. Wang, X. Li, X. Ma, L. Chen, J.-M. Liu, C.-G. Duan, J. ´I˜ niguez-Gonz´ alez, D. Wu, and Y. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 126801 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    E. J. Sie, C. M. Nyby, C. D. Pemmaraju, S. J. Park, X. Shen, J. Yang, M. C. Hoffmann, B. K. Ofori-Okai, R. Li, A. H. Reid, S. Weathersby, E. Mannebach, N. Finney, D. Rhodes, D. Chenet, A. Antony, L. Bali- cas, J. Hone, T. P. Devereaux, T. F. Heinz, X. Wang, and A. M. Lindenberg, Nature565, 61 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    Fukuda, K

    T. Fukuda, K. Makino, Y. Saito, P. Fons, A. V. Kolobov, K. Ueno, and M. Hase, Appl. Phys. Lett.116, 093103 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    Marini and M

    G. Marini and M. Calandra, Phys. Rev. B104, 144103 (2021)

    2021

  34. [34]

    Mocatti, G

    S. Mocatti, G. Marini, G. Volpato, P. Cudazzo, and M. Calandra, Nonequilibrium Photocarrier and Phonon Dynamics from First Principles: A Unified Treatment of Carrier-Carrier, Carrier-Phonon, and Phonon-Phonon Scattering (2025), arXiv:2512.08618 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. S...

    2009

  36. [36]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavaz- zoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carn- imeo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawamura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Ko...

    2017

  37. [37]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  38. [38]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, J. Chem. Phys.132, 154104 (2010)

    2010

  39. [39]

    D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B88, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  40. [40]

    K. F. Garrity, J. W. Bennett, K. M. Rabe, and D. Van- derbilt, Computational Materials Science81, 446 (2014)

    2014

  41. [41]

    Prandini, A

    G. Prandini, A. Marrazzo, I. E. Castelli, N. Mounet, and N. Marzari, npj Comput Mater4, 72 (2018)

    2018

  42. [42]

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Phys. Rev. B13, 5188 (1976)

    1976

  43. [43]

    Marzari, D

    N. Marzari, D. Vanderbilt, A. De Vita, and M. C. Payne, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3296 (1999)

    1999

  44. [44]

    Marini, G

    G. Marini, G. Marchese, G. Profeta, J. Sjakste, F. Macheda, N. Vast, F. Mauri, and M. Calandra, Com- puter Physics Communications295, 108950 (2024)

    2024

  45. [45]

    X. Li, X. Shi, D. Marian, D. Soriano, T. Cusati, G. Ian- naccone, G. Fiori, Q. Guo, W. Zhao, and Y. Wu, Sci. Adv.9, eade5706 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    M. L. Trolle, T. G. Pedersen, and V. V´ eniard, Scientific Reports7, 39844 (2017)

    2017

  47. [47]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Gian- nozzi, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 515 (2001)

    2001

  48. [48]

    Dormand and P

    J. Dormand and P. Prince, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics6, 19 (1980)

    1980

  49. [49]

    Furci, G

    M. Furci, G. Marini, and M. Calandra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236101 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Mocatti, G

    S. Mocatti, G. Marini, and M. Calandra, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.14, 9329 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haber- land, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peter- son, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, and et al., Nature Methods 17, 261–272 (2020)

    2020

  52. [52]

    Sohier, M

    T. Sohier, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, Phys. Rev. B96, 075448 (2017)

    2017

  53. [53]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi, J Appl Cryst44, 1272 (2011)

    2011

  54. [54]

    Liang, D

    J. Liang, D. Yang, J. Wu, J. I. Dadap, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and Z. Ye, Phys. Rev. X12, 041005 (2022)

    2022

  55. [55]

    Y. C. Kim, H. Yoo, V. T. Nguyen, S. Lee, J.-Y. Park, and Y. H. Ahn, Nanomaterials11, 1786 (2021)

    2021

  56. [56]

    J. M. Solomon, S. I. Ahmad, A. Dave, L.-S. Lu, F. Hada- vandMirzaee, S.-C. Lin, S.-H. Chen, C.-W. Luo, W.-H. Chang, and T.-H. Her, Sci Rep12, 6910 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    J. Wang, J. Ardelean, Y. Bai, A. Steinhoff, M. Florian, F. Jahnke, X. Xu, M. Kira, J. Hone, and X.-Y. Zhu, Sci. Adv.5, eaax0145 (2019)

    2019

  58. [58]

    A. W. Bataller, R. A. Younts, A. Rustagi, Y. Yu, H. Ardekani, A. Kemper, L. Cao, and K. Gundogdu, Nano Lett.19, 1104 (2019)

    2019

  59. [59]

    Karmakar, S

    M. Karmakar, S. Mukherjee, S. K. Ray, and P. K. Datta, Phys. Rev. B104, 075446 (2021)

    2021

  60. [60]

    C. Li, X. Zhang, P. Chen, K. Zhou, J. Yu, G. Wu, D. Xi- ang, H. Jiang, M. Wang, and Q. Liu, iScience26, 106315 (2023)

    2023

  61. [61]

    L. P. Hoang, D. Pesquera, G. N. Hinsley, R. Car- ley, L. Mercadier, M. Teichmann, E. M. Unterleutner, D. Knez, M. Dienstleder, S. Ganguly, T. C. Asmara, G. Merzoni, S. Parchenko, J. Schlappa, Z. Yin, J. M. Caicedo Roque, J. Santiso, I. Spasojevic, C. Carinan, T.- L. Lee, K. Rossnagel, J. Zegenhagen, G. Catalan, I. A. Vartanyants, A. Scherz, and G. Mercuri...

    2025