pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25991 · v1 · pith:BW3RZKTMnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.NA· math.NA

Fuzzy PyTorch: Rapid Numerical Variability Evaluation for Deep Learning Models

In\'es Gonzalez-Pepe , Hiba Akhaddar , Tristan Glatard , Yohan Chatelain This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 22:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.NAmath.NA
keywords numerical variabilitydeep learningstochastic arithmeticfloating-point errorsmodel evaluationscalabilityPyTorch integration
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fuzzy PyTorch adds stochastic arithmetic to PyTorch so numerical variability in deep learning models can be measured quickly without changing model behavior.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a library that embeds stochastic rounding modes directly into PyTorch to test how floating-point arithmetic affects deep learning outputs. It reports that the method runs between five and sixty times faster than earlier tools while producing the same model accuracy on tasks. The work shows the approach scales from small networks to models with hundreds of millions of parameters. A reader would care because floating-point uncertainty can affect reliability in deployed systems, and a fast way to measure it would let practitioners check many models routinely.

Core claim

The paper establishes that integrating stochastic arithmetic into PyTorch through probabilistic rounding and instruction set management produces a practical tool for variability evaluation: it preserves original model performance, delivers large runtime savings over prior methods, and handles networks ranging from one parameter to 341 million parameters.

What carries the argument

Probabilistic rounding with instruction set management, which supplies stochastic and up-down rounding modes inside the PyTorch execution path to simulate floating-point variability during model runs.

If this is right

  • Model developers can insert variability checks into existing PyTorch code with minimal changes.
  • Large-scale networks become feasible to audit for floating-point sensitivity.
  • Runtime cost of variability testing drops enough to support repeated checks during development.
  • Both stochastic and up-down rounding modes become available for the same model without separate toolchains.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same interface could be extended to other deep-learning frameworks to create a common way of reporting numerical robustness.
  • If the measured variability correlates with real deployment errors, it could guide selective use of higher precision in sensitive layers.
  • Routine variability scans might reveal which operations in a network are most responsible for output differences across hardware.

Load-bearing premise

The added rounding modes reproduce the same numerical effects that occur in ordinary floating-point hardware without introducing extra changes to the model's outputs or training dynamics.

What would settle it

A side-by-side test in which the variability statistics reported by the library differ from the spread of results obtained by running the identical model repeatedly on different floating-point hardware or in higher-precision arithmetic.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25991 by Hiba Akhaddar, In\'es Gonzalez-Pepe, Tristan Glatard, Yohan Chatelain.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of probabilistic rounding on the harmonic series example. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of slowdowns across numerical variability analysis tools for NAS Parallel Benchmarks [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of instrumentation runtimes across DL models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Significant digits across MNIST and WavLM model metrics for different instrumentation tools. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Significant digits for rounding modes across WavLM model’s class probabilities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Minimum Sørensen-Dice score across instrumentation tools and different labelled brain regions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Model embeddings across stochastic arithmetic implementations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Illustration of FastSurfer’s architecture. The CNN consists of four competitive dense blocks (CDB) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce Fuzzy PyTorch, a framework for rapid evaluation of numerical variability in deep learning (DL) models. As DL is increasingly applied to diverse tasks, understanding variability from floating-point arithmetic is essential to ensure robust and reliable performance. Tools assessing such variability must be scalable, efficient, and integrate seamlessly with existing frameworks while minimizing code modifications. Fuzzy PyTorch enables this by integrating stochastic arithmetic into PyTorch through Probabilistic Rounding with Instruction Set Management, a novel library interfacing with Verificarlo, a numerical analysis compiler. The library offers stochastic rounding mode and a novel mode; up-down rounding. Comparative evaluations show Fuzzy PyTorch maintains model performance and achieves runtime reductions of 5x to 60x versus Verrou, a state-of-the-art tool. We further demonstrate scalability by running models from 1 to 341 million parameters, confirming applicability across small and large DL architectures. Overall, Fuzzy PyTorch provides an efficient, scalable, and practical solution for assessing numerical variability in deep learning, enabling researchers and practitioners to quantify and manage floating-point uncertainty without compromising performance or computational efficiency.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces Fuzzy PyTorch, a PyTorch framework for evaluating numerical variability in deep learning models. It integrates stochastic arithmetic via a new Probabilistic Rounding with Instruction Set Management library built on Verificarlo, offering stochastic rounding and a novel up-down rounding mode. The central claims are that the tool maintains model performance while delivering 5x–60x runtime reductions versus Verrou and scales to models with 1–341 million parameters.

Significance. If the runtime and accuracy claims hold under rigorous experimental validation, the work would supply a practical, scalable instrument for quantifying floating-point uncertainty in DL pipelines. This addresses a recognized need for efficient variability analysis tools that integrate with existing frameworks without extensive code changes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claims that Fuzzy PyTorch 'maintains model performance' and achieves 'runtime reductions of 5x to 60x versus Verrou' are presented without any reference to the models tested, datasets, number of trials, error bars, or controls for post-hoc analysis choices. These omissions are load-bearing for the central empirical contribution.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and evaluation description: the novel 'up-down rounding' mode and the Probabilistic Rounding with Instruction Set Management library are introduced without a precise definition, pseudocode, or verification that they reproduce standard floating-point variability semantics rather than introducing unintended behavioral shifts.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'Comparative evaluations' and 'scalability by running models from 1 to 341 million parameters' but supplies no table, figure, or section reference for these results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on the abstract and the presentation of the new library and rounding mode. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions have been made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claims that Fuzzy PyTorch 'maintains model performance' and achieves 'runtime reductions of 5x to 60x versus Verrou' are presented without any reference to the models tested, datasets, number of trials, error bars, or controls for post-hoc analysis choices. These omissions are load-bearing for the central empirical contribution.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should supply sufficient context for the central empirical claims. In the revised manuscript we have updated the abstract to reference the range of models evaluated (1 million to 341 million parameters), the datasets employed, the number of independent trials, and the reporting of error bars and controls; full experimental details and post-hoc analysis procedures remain in the dedicated evaluation section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and evaluation description: the novel 'up-down rounding' mode and the Probabilistic Rounding with Instruction Set Management library are introduced without a precise definition, pseudocode, or verification that they reproduce standard floating-point variability semantics rather than introducing unintended behavioral shifts.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract itself does not contain these elements. The full manuscript already includes a methods section with a precise definition of the Probabilistic Rounding with Instruction Set Management library, pseudocode for the up-down rounding mode, and verification experiments confirming that both modes reproduce standard floating-point variability semantics (via direct comparison with Verrou). To address the referee's concern we have added a concise definition and a forward reference to the verification results in the revised abstract. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper introduces Fuzzy PyTorch, a software framework integrating stochastic arithmetic into PyTorch via Probabilistic Rounding and Verificarlo for evaluating floating-point variability in DL models. All claims are empirical: runtime speedups (5x-60x vs Verrou) and scalability (1 to 341M parameters) measured against external baselines. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the provided text. The central results rest on comparative measurements whose validity is independent of internal definitions or prior author work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The work rests on standard assumptions about floating-point behavior and the correctness of the underlying Verificarlo compiler; it introduces new software components without new physical or mathematical entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Stochastic rounding modes can be used to model floating-point arithmetic variability in neural network computations
    Invoked when describing the integration of stochastic arithmetic into PyTorch for variability evaluation.
invented entities (2)
  • Probabilistic Rounding with Instruction Set Management library no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide a fast interface between PyTorch and Verificarlo for stochastic arithmetic
    New component developed for this framework, with no independent evidence provided outside the paper.
  • up-down rounding mode no independent evidence
    purpose: Novel stochastic rounding variant offered alongside standard stochastic rounding
    Introduced as part of the library; no external validation mentioned.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5733 in / 1389 out tokens · 33520 ms · 2026-06-29T22:56:29.007714+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mixed precision accumulation for neural network inference guided by componentwise forward error analysis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.15568,

    El-Mehdi El Arar, Silviu-Ioan Filip, Theo Mary, and Elisa Riccietti. Mixed precision accumulation for neural network inference guided by componentwise forward error analysis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.15568,

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    Rounding modes.https://awsdocs-neuron.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/ general/arch/neuron-features/rounding-modes.html, n.d

    AWS Neuron Team. Rounding modes.https://awsdocs-neuron.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/ general/arch/neuron-features/rounding-modes.html, n.d. Accessed: 2025-06-25. Théo Beuzeville, Alfredo Buttari, Serge Gratton, and Theo Mary. Deterministic and probabilistic backward error analysis of neural networks in floating-point arithmetic

    2025

  3. [3]

    Automatic exploration of reduced floating-point representations in iterative methods

    Yohan Chatelain, Eric Petit, Pablo de Oliveira Castro, Ghislain Lartigue, and David Defour. Automatic exploration of reduced floating-point representations in iterative methods. InEuro-Par 2019: Parallel Processing: 25th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Göttingen, Germany, August 26–30, 2019, Proceedings 25, pp. 481–494. Springer,

    2019

  4. [4]

    Accessed: 2024-12-21

    URLhttps://github.com/onnx/onnx. Accessed: 2024-12-21. Intel Corporation. oneDNN: Deep Learning Open Source Performance Library,

    2024

  5. [5]

    com/oneapi-src/oneDNN

    URLhttps://github. com/oneapi-src/oneDNN. Accessed: 2024-12-21. Pablo de Oliveira Castro.High Performance Computing code optimizations: Tuning performance and accu- racy. PhD thesis, Université Paris-Saclay,

    2024

  6. [6]

    Accessed: 2024-12-17

    URLhttps://github.com/Deep-MI/FastSurfer. Accessed: 2024-12-17. DavidDefour, FrançoisFévotte, StefGraillat, FabienneJézéquel, WilfriedKirschenmann, Jean-LucLamotte, Bruno Lathuilière, Yves Lhuillier, Eric Petit, Julien Signoles, et al. InterFLOP, Interoperable Tools for Computing, Debugging, Validation and Optimization of Floating-Point Programs. InISC-HP...

    2024

  7. [7]

    Reproducibility of tumor segmentation outcomes with a deep learning model

    13 Published in Transactions on Machine Learning Research (01/2026) Morgane Des Ligneris, Axel Bonnet, Yohan Chatelain, Tristan Glatard, Michaël Sdika, Gaël Vila, Valentine Wargnier-Dauchelle, Sorina Pop, and Carole Frindel. Reproducibility of tumor segmentation outcomes with a deep learning model. In2023 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Biomedical Im...

    2026

  8. [8]

    ECAPA-TDNN: Emphasized Channel Attention, Propagation and Aggregation in TDNN Based Speaker Verification

    Brecht Desplanques, Jenthe Thienpondt, and Kris Demuynck. Ecapa-tdnn: Emphasized channel attention, propagation and aggregation in tdnn based speaker verification.arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07143,

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  9. [9]

    VERROU: a CESTAC evaluation without recompilation.SCAN 2016, pp

    François Févotte and Bruno Lathuiliere. VERROU: a CESTAC evaluation without recompilation.SCAN 2016, pp. 47,

    2016

  10. [10]

    Conserva- tive & Aggressive NaNs Accelerate U-Nets for Neuroimaging.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.17180,

    Inés Gonzalez-Pepe, Vinuyan Sivakolunthu, Jacob Fortin, Yohan Chatelain, and Tristan Glatard. Conserva- tive & Aggressive NaNs Accelerate U-Nets for Neuroimaging.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.17180,

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Highway, 2024a

    Google. Highway, 2024a. URLhttps://github.com/google/highway. Accessed: 2024-12-17. Google. Protocol buffers, 2024b. URLhttps://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf. Accessed: 2024- 12-21. Google. Highway: Performance-portable, length-agnostic simd with runtime dispatch.https://github. com/google/highway,

    2024

  12. [12]

    IEEE Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ document/4610935, aug

    IEEE Computer Society. IEEE Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ document/4610935, aug

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Fabienne Jézéquel and Jean-Marie Chesneaux

    IEEE Std 754-2008. Fabienne Jézéquel and Jean-Marie Chesneaux. CADNA: a library for estimating round-off error propagation. Computer Physics Communications, 178(12):933–955,

    2008

  14. [14]

    DeepStability: A Study of Unstable Numerical Methods and Their Solutions in Deep Learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.03493,

    Eliska Kloberdanz, Kyle G Kloberdanz, and Wei Le. DeepStability: A Study of Unstable Numerical Methods and Their Solutions in Deep Learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.03493,

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    CGO 2004., pp. 75–86. IEEE,

    2004

  16. [16]

    TinyIREE: An ML execution environment for embedded systems from compilation to deployment.IEEE micro, 42(5):9–16,

    14 Published in Transactions on Machine Learning Research (01/2026) Hsin-I Cindy Liu, Marius Brehler, Mahesh Ravishankar, Nicolas Vasilache, Ben Vanik, and Stella Laurenzo. TinyIREE: An ML execution environment for embedded systems from compilation to deployment.IEEE micro, 42(5):9–16,

    2026

  17. [17]

    Ac- cessed: 2024-12-17

    URLhttps://github.com/verificarlo/significantdigits. Ac- cessed: 2024-12-17. Marc Vicuna, Martin Khannouz, Gregory Kiar, Yohan Chatelain, and Tristan Glatard. Reducing numerical precision preserves classification accuracy in mondrian forests. In2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 2785–2790. IEEE,

    2024

  18. [18]

    These methods rely on non-deterministic rounding

    15 Published in Transactions on Machine Learning Research (01/2026) A Numerical Variability Estimation Measuring numerical variability in DL models can involve a family of techniques that introduce randomness into floating-point computations. These methods rely on non-deterministic rounding. Unlike standard IEEE-754 rounding modes, this approach rounds to...

    2026

  19. [19]

    (SR) technique rounds the result of each floating-point with a probability that depends on the distance between the exact value and the two closest representable floating- point numbers. The probability is computed as: ◦sr(x) = { ⌊x⌋with probabilitypsr ⌈x⌉with probability1−psr (4) wherep sr(x)is defined as: psr(x) = 1−x−⌊x⌋ ⌈x⌉−⌊x⌋ SR implementations incl...

    1998

  20. [20]

    The model was trained on the mPower speech dataset (Bot et al., 2016)

    and a linear layer classifier followed by a max operation to obtain binary classification to determine whether a subject has Parkinson’s disease or is a healthy control 17 Published in Transactions on Machine Learning Research (01/2026) subject. The model was trained on the mPower speech dataset (Bot et al., 2016). We will refer to this pipeline as WavLM ...

    2026

  21. [21]

    is a CNN model that performs whole-brain segmentation, cortical surface reconstruction, fast spherical mapping, and cortical thickness analysis from anatomical MRI. The FastSurfer CNN is inspired by the QuickNAT model (Roy et al., 2019), which is composed of three 2D fully convolutional neural networks—each associated with a different 2D slice orientation...

    2019

  22. [22]

    This segmentation step is entirely performed by the CNN, without surface reconstruction, and uses the pre-trained FastSurfer model (v2.1.0) available on GitHub (Deep-MI, 2024)

    We focus exclu- sively on the task of whole-brain segmentation, defined as voxel-wise anatomical labeling of brain regions. This segmentation step is entirely performed by the CNN, without surface reconstruction, and uses the pre-trained FastSurfer model (v2.1.0) available on GitHub (Deep-MI, 2024). FastSurfer has demonstrated high accuracy, strong genera...

    2024