pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26233 · v1 · pith:5IZMX3EWnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.str-el

Slave-boson Formalism for Superconducting Pairing at Strong Coupling

Sarbajit Mazumdar , Jonas Issing , Jannis Seufert , David Riegler , Peter W\"olfle , Ronny Thomale , Michael Klett This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 19:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el
keywords slave-bosonHubbard modelsuperconductivitycupratespairing vertexgap equationstrong coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fluctuations around the slave-boson saddle point generate an effective pairing vertex that produces cuprate-like gaps when solving the Hubbard-model gap equation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a slave-boson approach to superconductivity in the one-band Hubbard model by building an effective pairing interaction from dynamical fluctuations about the mean-field saddle point. It solves the resulting anisotropic and frequency-dependent gap equation on the square lattice to track how superconductivity emerges with doping and interaction strength. The computed pairing instabilities and real-frequency gap structures align qualitatively with those observed in cuprate materials. This method incorporates strong-correlation renormalizations while keeping the pairing calculation transparent. It supplies a route that can be extended to multi-orbital cases.

Core claim

In the spin-rotation-invariant Kotliar-Ruckenstein slave-boson formalism for the one-band Hubbard model, dynamical fluctuations about the saddle point produce an effective pairing vertex; solving the anisotropic, frequency-dependent gap equation with this vertex maps pairing instabilities whose doping, temperature, and real-frequency gap structures qualitatively match experimental cuprate observations.

What carries the argument

Effective pairing vertex constructed from dynamical fluctuations about the saddle point of the spin-rotation-invariant Kotliar-Ruckenstein slave-boson mean-field, which folds strong-coupling renormalizations into the interaction used for the gap equation.

If this is right

  • The real-frequency gap structure can be extracted and compared directly to tunneling or photoemission spectra.
  • Pairing instabilities can be followed continuously across doping to locate the superconducting dome.
  • The same vertex construction applies without change to multi-orbital Hubbard models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Direct comparison of the derived vertex against quantum Monte Carlo estimates of the pairing susceptibility on small clusters would test the fluctuation approximation.
  • Changing the underlying mean-field ansatz and recomputing the gap would quantify how sensitive the results are to the choice of saddle point.
  • Adding next-nearest-neighbor hopping to the model and repeating the gap solution would show whether the cuprate-like features survive more realistic band structures.

Load-bearing premise

The spin-rotation-invariant Kotliar-Ruckenstein slave-boson mean-field ground state supplies a starting point whose fluctuations correctly generate the pairing interaction at strong coupling.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of the gap equation for parameters corresponding to a known cuprate compound that yields either the wrong symmetry or a doping dependence of the transition temperature that deviates from measured values would show the framework does not capture the pairing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26233 by David Riegler, Jannis Seufert, Jonas Issing, Michael Klett, Peter W\"olfle, Ronny Thomale, Sarbajit Mazumdar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. From top to bottom: static spin, charge, and bare susceptibilities, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (c–f) illustrates the representative gap structures in momentum space. Notably, the p ′ gap function shares nodes with both neighboring d-wave states, making it a consistent intermediate solution at the phase boundary where the transition is near U = 0. We emphasize that the large-U part of the depicted phase diagram should be viewed primarily as theory space for internal consistency checks and for classif… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Filling dependence of magnetic response, effective interaction scale, and superconducting properties. (a) Maximum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Filling dependence of the real-frequency gap peak [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the emergence of superconductivity in the one-band Hubbard model using the spin-rotation-invariant Kotliar-Ruckenstein slave-boson (SB) approach. Motivated by its intrinsically renormalized mean-field ground state, we construct an effective pairing vertex from dynamical fluctuations about the saddle point. Solving the anisotropic, frequency-dependent gap equation on the square lattice, we map the pairing instabilities across doping, interaction, temperature and real-frequency gap structure that qualitatively match experimental cuprate observations. This framework merges strong-correlation SB-type renormalizations with RPA-type pairing transparency, providing a scalable route to modeling multi-orbital superconductivity at strong coupling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a slave-boson formalism for superconducting pairing in the one-band Hubbard model at strong coupling. Using the spin-rotation-invariant Kotliar-Ruckenstein approach, an effective pairing vertex is constructed from dynamical fluctuations about the saddle point. The anisotropic, frequency-dependent gap equation is solved on the square lattice to map pairing instabilities as functions of doping, interaction strength, temperature, and real-frequency gap structure, with the results claimed to qualitatively match cuprate observations. The framework is presented as combining SB renormalizations with RPA-type pairing transparency for scalability to multi-orbital systems.

Significance. If the effective vertex construction proves robust and the pairing instabilities are shown to be genuine predictions, the approach would supply a computationally tractable route to strong-coupling superconductivity that retains explicit renormalizations from the slave-boson saddle point while retaining the transparency of an RPA-style gap equation. This could be valuable for extending such calculations to multi-orbital models where full DMFT or QMC treatments remain expensive.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and implied § on vertex construction): the claim that the effective pairing vertex is generated from fluctuations about the saddle point and yields independent pairing instabilities requires explicit demonstration that the solutions are not largely fixed by parameters already adjusted to reproduce normal-state properties. Without this separation shown in the derivation or numerical results, the reported qualitative match to cuprate doping and gap structure risks circularity.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states the method but the full manuscript should supply at least one concrete example (e.g., a specific doping and U value) of the gap-equation solution together with the corresponding normal-state renormalization parameters to allow the reader to assess independence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the constructive comment on our manuscript. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and implied § on vertex construction): the claim that the effective pairing vertex is generated from fluctuations about the saddle point and yields independent pairing instabilities requires explicit demonstration that the solutions are not largely fixed by parameters already adjusted to reproduce normal-state properties. Without this separation shown in the derivation or numerical results, the reported qualitative match to cuprate doping and gap structure risks circularity.

    Authors: The slave-boson saddle-point equations are solved self-consistently in the normal state, fixing the boson condensates, Lagrange multipliers, and quasiparticle renormalization factors to match the doping-dependent band structure and filling. The effective pairing vertex is then obtained from the dynamical (frequency-dependent) fluctuations of the slave-boson fields around this saddle point via the fluctuation matrix; these terms introduce additional momentum and frequency structure not fixed by the static saddle-point conditions alone. The gap equation is solved as an eigenvalue problem with this vertex, so that the resulting Tc(doping), gap anisotropy, and instability thresholds emerge as outputs. We acknowledge, however, that the manuscript does not currently contain an explicit side-by-side comparison isolating the dynamical-fluctuation contribution. We will therefore add a short subsection (or paragraph in the methods) that (i) writes the vertex explicitly in terms of the fluctuation propagators and (ii) shows numerically that suppressing the dynamical components alters the pairing eigenvalues, thereby demonstrating the separation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe a standard methodological pipeline: Kotliar-Ruckenstein slave-boson saddle-point renormalization followed by fluctuation-derived vertex and solution of the gap equation. No equations, self-citations, or parameter-fitting steps are quoted that reduce the claimed pairing instabilities to the normal-state inputs by construction. The derivation chain remains independent of the target observables, with the saddle-point serving as an external starting point rather than a self-referential definition of the pairing result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the standard slave-boson representation of the Hubbard model and the assumption that fluctuations about its mean-field saddle point generate the pairing vertex; no new particles are introduced beyond the established auxiliary bosons.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard interaction U
    The on-site repulsion strength is a free parameter of the model that is varied across the phase diagram.
  • doping level
    Hole concentration is scanned as an external control parameter.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The saddle-point solution of the spin-rotation-invariant Kotliar-Ruckenstein slave-boson functional provides a valid reference state whose dynamical fluctuations generate the pairing interaction.
    Invoked when the effective vertex is constructed from fluctuations about the saddle point.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5659 in / 1322 out tokens · 44829 ms · 2026-06-29T19:04:44.394942+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spin Dynamics from Niu-Kleinman Adiabatic Approach and Slave Boson Mean Field Theory

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NK+KRSB adiabatic approach yields spin-wave dispersions in Hubbard models with better DQMC agreement than RPA and close to TDGA.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Blankenbecler, D

    R. Blankenbecler, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Monte carlo calculations of coupled boson-fermion sys- tems. i, Physical Review D24, 2278 (1981)

    1981

  2. [2]

    Zhang, J

    S. Zhang, J. Carlson, and J. E. Gubernatis, Pairing corre- lations in the two-dimensional hubbard model, Physical Review Letters78, 4486 (1997)

    1997

  3. [3]

    Z. Cao, J. Li, J. Su, T. Ying, and H.-K. Tang, Dominant p-wave pairing induced by nearest-neighbor attraction in the square-lattice extended hubbard model, Physical Re- view B111, 024509 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Physical Review Letters69, 2863 (1992)

    1992

  5. [5]

    S. R. White and D. J. Scalapino, Stripes on a 6-leg hub- bard ladder, Physical Review Letters91, 136403 (2003)

    2003

  6. [6]

    Jiang, T

    Y.-F. Jiang, T. P. Devereaux, and H.-C. Jiang, Ground- state phase diagram and superconductivity of the doped hubbard model on six-leg square cylinders, Physical Re- view B109, 085121 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Knizia and G

    G. Knizia and G. K.-L. Chan, Density matrix embed- ding: A simple alternative to dynamical mean-field the- ory, Physical Review Letters109, 186404 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    Zheng and G

    B.-X. Zheng and G. K.-L. Chan, Ground-state phase di- agram of the square lattice hubbard model from density matrix embedding theory, Physical Review B93, 035126 (2016)

    2016

  9. [9]

    Shankar, Renormalization-group approach to interact- ing fermions, Reviews of Modern Physics66, 129 (1994)

    R. Shankar, Renormalization-group approach to interact- ing fermions, Reviews of Modern Physics66, 129 (1994)

    1994

  10. [10]

    C. J. Halboth and W. Metzner,d-wave superconductiv- ity and pomeranchuk instability in the two-dimensional hubbard model, Physical Review Letters85, 5162 (2000)

    2000

  11. [11]

    Honerkamp and M

    C. Honerkamp and M. Salmhofer, Magnetic and super- conducting instabilities of the hubbard model at the van hove filling, Physical Review Letters87, 187004 (2001)

    2001

  12. [12]

    Metzner, M

    W. Metzner, M. Salmhofer, C. Honerkamp, V. Meden, and K. Sch¨ onhammer, Functional renormalization group approach to correlated fermion systems, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics84, 299 (2012)

    2012

  13. [13]

    Kohn and J

    W. Kohn and J. M. Luttinger, New mechanism for su- perconductivity, Physical Review Letters15, 524 (1965)

    1965

  14. [14]

    J. M. Luttinger, New mechanism for superconductivity, Physical Review150, 202 (1966)

    1966

  15. [15]

    N. F. Berk and J. R. Schrieffer, Effect of ferromagnetic spin correlations on superconductivity, Physical Review Letters17, 433 (1966). 11

    1966

  16. [16]

    D. J. Scalapino, E. Loh, and J. E. Hirsch,d-wave pairing near a spin-density-wave instability, Physical Review B 34, 8190 (1986)

    1986

  17. [17]

    D. J. Scalapino, The case ford x2−y2 pairing in the cuprate superconductors, Physics Reports250, 329 (1995)

    1995

  18. [18]

    A. T. Rømer, A. Kreisel, I. Eremin, M. A. Malakhov, T. A. Maier, P. J. Hirschfeld, and B. M. Andersen, Pair- ing symmetry of the one-band hubbard model in the paramagnetic weak-coupling limit: A numerical RPA study, Physical Review B92, 104505 (2015)

    2015

  19. [19]

    F. I. V. ˇSimkovic, X.-W. Liu, Y. Deng, and E. Kozik, Ground-state phase diagram of the repulsive fermionic hubbard model on the square lattice from weak coupling, Physical Review B94, 085106 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    Monthoux and D

    P. Monthoux and D. J. Scalapino, Self-consistentd x2−y2 pairing in a two-dimensional hubbard model, Physical Review Letters72, 1874 (1994)

    1994

  21. [21]

    N. E. Bickers, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Con- serving approximations for strongly correlated electron systems: Bethe-Salpeter equation and dynamics for the two-dimensional hubbard model, Physical Review Letters 62, 961 (1989)

    1989

  22. [22]

    Metzner and D

    W. Metzner and D. Vollhardt, Correlated lattice fermions ind=∞dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 324 (1989)

    1989

  23. [23]

    Georges and G

    A. Georges and G. Kotliar, Hubbard model in infinite dimensions, Phys. Rev. B45, 6479 (1992)

    1992

  24. [24]

    Georges, G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozen- berg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 13 (1996)

    1996

  25. [25]

    Held, Electronic structure calculations using dynami- cal mean field theory, Advances in Physics56, 829 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730701619647

    K. Held, Electronic structure calculations using dynami- cal mean field theory, Advances in Physics56, 829 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018730701619647

    work page doi:10.1080/00018730701619647 2007

  26. [26]

    Rohringer, H

    G. Rohringer, H. Hafermann, A. Toschi, A. A. Katanin, A. E. Antipov, M. I. Katsnelson, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. N. Rubtsov, and K. Held, Diagrammatic routes to nonlocal correlations beyond dynamical mean field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025003 (2018)

    2018

  27. [27]

    M. C. Gutzwiller, Effect of correlation on the ferromag- netism of transition metals, Physical Review Letters10, 159 (1963)

    1963

  28. [28]

    M. C. Gutzwiller, Effect of correlation on the ferromag- netism of transition metals, Physical Review134, A923 (1964)

    1964

  29. [29]

    M. C. Gutzwiller, Correlation of electrons in a narrow s band, Physical Review137, A1726 (1965)

    1965

  30. [30]

    W. F. Brinkman and T. M. Rice, Application of gutzwiller’s variational method to the metal-insulator transition, Physical Review B2, 4302 (1970)

    1970

  31. [31]

    Vollhardt, Normal 3he: An almost localized fermi liq- uid, Reviews of Modern Physics56, 99 (1984)

    D. Vollhardt, Normal 3he: An almost localized fermi liq- uid, Reviews of Modern Physics56, 99 (1984)

    1984

  32. [32]

    Kotliar and A

    G. Kotliar and A. E. Ruckenstein, New functional inte- gral approach to strongly correlated fermi systems: The gutzwiller approximation as a saddle point, Physical Re- view Letters57, 1362 (1986)

    1986

  33. [33]

    Fr´ esard and G

    R. Fr´ esard and G. Kotliar, Interplay of mott transition and ferromagnetism in the orbitally degenerate hubbard model, Physical Review B56, 12909 (1997)

    1997

  34. [34]

    Lechermann, A

    F. Lechermann, A. Georges, G. Kotliar, and O. Parcol- let, Rotationally invariant slave-boson formalism and mo- mentum dependence of the quasiparticle weight, Physical Review B76, 155102 (2007)

    2007

  35. [35]

    Legner, A

    M. Legner, A. R¨ uegg, and M. Sigrist, Topological invari- ants, surface states, and interaction-driven phase transi- tions in correlated kondo insulators with cubic symmetry, Phys. Rev. B89, 085110 (2014)

    2014

  36. [36]

    Klett, S

    M. Klett, S. Ok, D. Riegler, P. W¨ olfle, R. Thomale, and T. Neupert, Topology and magnetism in the kondo insu- lator phase diagram, Phys. Rev. B101, 161112 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Se- ries A276, 238 (1963)

    1963

  38. [38]

    Kanamori, Electron correlation and ferromagnetism of transition metals, Progress of Theoretical Physics30, 275 (1963)

    J. Kanamori, Electron correlation and ferromagnetism of transition metals, Progress of Theoretical Physics30, 275 (1963)

    1963

  39. [39]

    P. W. Anderson, The resonating valence bond state in la2cuo4 and superconductivity, Science235, 1196 (1987)

    1987

  40. [40]

    F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Effective hamiltonian for the superconducting cu oxides, Physical Review B37, 3759 (1988)

    1988

  41. [41]

    T. Li, Y. S. Sun, and P. W¨ olfle, Dynamic response func- tions of Hubbard model in Gutzwiller approximation, Z. Physik B - Condensed Matter82, 369 (1991)

    1991

  42. [42]

    Zimmermann, R

    W. Zimmermann, R. Fr´ esard, and P. W¨ olfle, Spin and charge structure factor of the two-dimensional hubbard model, Physical Review B56, 10097 (1997)

    1997

  43. [43]

    Riegler, M

    D. Riegler, M. Klett, T. Neupert, R. Thomale, and P. W¨ olfle, Slave-boson analysis of the two-dimensional hubbard model, Physical Review B101, 235137 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    Seufert, D

    J. Seufert, D. Riegler, M. Klett, R. Thomale, and P. W¨ olfle, Breakdown of charge homogeneity in the two- dimensional hubbard model: Slave-boson study of mag- netic order, Physical Review B103, 165117 (2021)

    2021

  45. [45]

    Pfitzner and P

    M. Pfitzner and P. Wo¨lfle, Quasiparticle interaction in a nearly localized fermi liquid: Application to liquid he3 and heavy-fermion systems, Physical Review B33, 2003 (1985)

    2003

  46. [46]

    G. M. Eliashberg, Interactions between electrons and lat- tice vibrations in a superconductor, Sov. Phys. JETP11, 696 (1960)

    1960

  47. [47]

    A. T. Rømer, T. A. Maier, A. Kreisel, I. Eremin, P. J. Hirschfeld, and B. M. Andersen, Pairing in the two- dimensional hubbard model from weak to strong cou- pling, Physical Review Research2, 013108 (2020)

    2020

  48. [48]

    Y. Deng, E. Kozik, N. V. Prokof’ev, and B. V. Svis- tunov, Emergent BCS regime of the two-dimensional fermionic Hubbard model: Ground-state phase diagram, Europhysics Letters110, 57001 (2015)

    2015

  49. [49]

    Eremin, D

    I. Eremin, D. Manske, C. Joas, and K. H. Bennemann, Electronic theory for superconductivity in Sr 2RuO4: Triplet pairing due to spin-fluctuation exchange, Euro- physics Letters58, 871 (2002)

    2002

  50. [50]

    Pavarini, I

    E. Pavarini, I. Dasgupta, T. Saha-Dasgupta, O. Jepsen, and O. K. Andersen, Band-structure trend in hole-doped cuprates and correlation witht c,max, Physical Review Letters87, 047003 (2001)

    2001

  51. [51]

    D. J. Scalapino, A common thread: The pairing inter- action for unconventional superconductors, Reviews of Modern Physics84, 1383 (2012)

    2012

  52. [52]

    A. V. Chubukov, D. Pines, and J. Schmalian, A spin fluctuation model ford-wave superconductivity, in The Physics of Superconductors, edited by K.-H. Benne- mann and J. B. Ketterson (Springer, 2003) pp. 495–590

    2003

  53. [53]

    Moriya and K

    T. Moriya and K. Ueda, Spin fluctuations and high tem- perature superconductivity, Advances in Physics49, 555 12 (2000)

    2000

  54. [54]

    Monthoux and D

    P. Monthoux and D. Pines, Spin-fluctuation-induced superconductivity and normal-state properties of YBa2Cu3O7, Phys. Rev. B49, 4261 (1994)

    1994

  55. [55]

    Brinckmann and P

    J. Brinckmann and P. A. Lee, Slave boson approach to neutron scattering in YBa2Cu3O6+y superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 2915 (1999)

    1999

  56. [56]

    Wallerberger, S

    M. Wallerberger, S. Badr, S. Hoshino, S. Huber, F. Kak- izawa, T. Koretsune, Y. Nagai, K. Nogaki, T. Nomoto, H. Mori, J. Otsuki, S. Ozaki, T. Plaikner, R. Sakurai, C. Vogel, N. Witt, K. Yoshimi, and H. Shinaoka, sparse- ir: Optimal compression and sparse sampling of many- body propagators, SoftwareX21, 101266 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    Klett, J

    M. Klett, J. Beyer, D. Riegler, J. Seufert, P. W¨ olfle, S. Rachel, and R. Thomale, Incommensurate magnetic order: A fingerprint for electronic correlations in hole- doped cuprates, Phys. Rev. B110, 085104 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Kitatani, N

    M. Kitatani, N. Tsuji, and H. Aoki, Flex+dmft approach to thed-wave superconducting phase diagram of the two- dimensional hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B92, 085104 (2015)

    2015

  59. [59]

    Benhabib, A

    S. Benhabib, A. Sacuto, M. Civelli, I. Paul, M. Cazay- ous, Y. Gallais, M.-A. M´ easson, R. D. Zhong, J. Schnee- loch, G. D. Gu, D. Colson, and A. Forget, Collapse of the normal-state pseudogap at a lifshitz transition in the bi2sr2cacu2o8+δ cuprate superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 147001 (2015)

    2015

  60. [60]

    Piriou, N

    A. Piriou, N. Jenkins, C. Berthod, I. Maggio-Aprile, and Ø. Fischer, First direct observation of the van hove sin- gularity in the tunnelling spectra of cuprates, Nat. Com- mun.2, 221 (2011)

    2011

  61. [61]

    Horio, K

    M. Horio, K. Hauser, Y. Sassa, et al., Three-dimensional fermi surface of overdoped la-based cuprates, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 077004 (2018)

    2018

  62. [62]

    J. G. Storey, J. L. Tallon, and G. V. M. Williams, Saddle- point van hove singularity and the phase diagram of high- Tc cuprates, Phys. Rev. B76, 174522 (2007)

    2007

  63. [63]

    J. P. Carbotte, Properties of boson-exchange supercon- ductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.62, 1027 (1990)

    1990

  64. [64]

    Y. Wang, A. Abanov, B. L. Altshuler, E. A. Yuzbashyan, and A. V. Chubukov, Superconductivity near a quantum- critical point: The special role of the first matsubara frequency, Physical Review Letters117, 157001 (2016)

    2016

  65. [65]

    Y.-M. Wu, A. Abanov, Y. Wang, and A. V. Chubukov, Special role of the first matsubara frequency for super- conductivity near a quantum critical point: Nonlinear gap equation belowT c and spectral properties in real frequencies, Physical Review B99, 144512 (2019)

    2019

  66. [66]

    Manske, I

    D. Manske, I. Eremin, and K. H. Bennemann, Renor- malization of the elementary excitations in hole- and electron-doped cuprates due to spin fluctuations, Phys. Rev. B67, 134520 (2003)

    2003

  67. [67]

    Abanov, A

    A. Abanov, A. V. Chubukov, and J. Schmalian, Quantum-critical theory of the spin-fermion model and its application to cuprates: Normal state analysis, Advances in Physics52, 119 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1080/0001873021000057123

    work page doi:10.1080/0001873021000057123 2003

  68. [68]

    H. J. Vidberg and J. W. Serene, Solving the eliashberg equations by means ofn-point pad´ e approximants, Jour- nal of Low Temperature Physics29, 179 (1977)

    1977

  69. [69]

    Baker, George A., Essentials of Pad´ e Approximants (Academic Press, New York, 1975)

    J. Baker, George A., Essentials of Pad´ e Approximants (Academic Press, New York, 1975)

    1975

  70. [70]

    Dahm and L

    T. Dahm and L. Tewordt, Quasiparticle and spin exci- tation spectra in the normal andd-wave superconduct- ing state of the two-dimensional hubbard model, Physical Review Letters74, 793 (1995)

    1995

  71. [71]

    Gao, Robusta 1 superconductivity in the kagome lat- tice, Physical Review B109, 214501 (2024)

    Y. Gao, Robusta 1 superconductivity in the kagome lat- tice, Physical Review B109, 214501 (2024)

    2024

  72. [72]

    Valla, T

    T. Valla, T. E. Kidd, J. D. Rameau, H.-J. Noh, G. D. Gu, P. D. Johnson, H.-B. Yang, and H. Ding, Fine details of the nodal electronic excitations in bi2sr2cacu2o8+δ, Phys. Rev. B73, 184518 (2006)

    2006

  73. [73]

    Valla, I

    T. Valla, I. K. Drozdov, and G. D. Gu, Disappearance of superconductivity due to vanishing coupling in overdoped bi2sr2cacu2o8+δ, Nat. Commun.11, 569 (2020)

    2020

  74. [74]

    H. F. Fong, P. Bourges, Y. Sidis, L. P. Regnault, J. Bossy, A. Ivanov, D. L. Milius, I. A. Aksay, and B. Keimer, Spin susceptibility in underdoped YBa 2Cu3O6+x, Phys. Rev. B61, 14773 (2000)

    2000

  75. [75]

    Brehm, E

    S. Brehm, E. Arrigoni, M. Aichhorn, and W. Hanke, The- ory of two-particle excitations and the magnetic suscep- tibility in high-t c cuprate superconductors, Europhysics Letters89, 27005 (2010). Supplemental Material for Slave-boson Formalism for Superconducting Pairing at Strong Coupling Sarbajit Mazumdar, 1 Jonas Issing, 1 Jannis Seufert, 1 David Riegle...

    2010

  76. [76]

    Initialize the coefficient vectorc (0)(iωn)

  77. [77]

    ,T max, construct ∆(t−1)(p, iωm) = X γ c(t−1) γ (iωm)φ γ(p)

    Fort= 1,2, . . . ,T max, construct ∆(t−1)(p, iωm) = X γ c(t−1) γ (iωm)φ γ(p)

  78. [78]

    Using ∆ (t−1)(p, iωm), assemble the kernel Γβα(n, m;{c (t−1)}) from Eq. (S4.3)

  79. [79]

    Compute the updated coefficientsec(t) β (iωn) from Eq. (S4.2)

  80. [80]

    Apply linear mixing according to c(t) β = (1−η)c (t−1) β +ηec(t) β

Showing first 80 references.