Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 76 references

Programming nanomechanical computation with light

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cavity optomechanical interactions enable laser-controlled digital logic gates with nanomechanical resonators operating near thermal amplitudes.

desk verdict The paper experimentally demonstrates laser-controlled nanomechanical logic gates with level restoration using cavity optomechanics near thermal amplitudes. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.26319 v1 pith:TVD3CUMU submitted 2026-05-25 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph

Xiaofei Guo , Jonne Drost , Fons van der Laan , Jesse J. Slim , Marc Serra-Garcia , Ewold Verhagen This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph
keywords optomechanicsnanomechanicalcomputationlogicgatescavityphysicalcomputingnonlinearresonatorsdigitalthermalamplitudes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that cavity optomechanical interactions provide the strong controllable nonlinearities needed to program computation directly into nanomechanical degrees of freedom using laser light. It demonstrates a set of basic digital logic gates that include level restoration and controlled mechanical couplings between modes. These elements are presented as the necessary building blocks for constructing arbitrary computing networks. The gates function at amplitudes close to thermal noise, where the system's behavior is governed by thermodynamic stochasticity rather than external amplification. This approach treats physical properties such as thermal noise as resources for computation instead of obstacles to be overcome.

What carries the argument

Cavity optomechanical interactions, which supply the strong, controllable nonlinearity for laser programming of nanomechanical logic and couplings.

What would settle it

An observation that the logic gates lose signal levels or produce incorrect outputs when operated at thermal amplitudes without external amplification or post-processing.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Cavity optomechanical interactions allow laser-controlled computation with nanomechanical degrees of freedom. A set of basic digital logic gates with level restoration and controlled mechanical couplings are demonstrated as essential ingredients for arbitrary computing networks. The system operates close to thermal amplitudes in the regime where thermodynamic stochasticity governs its behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The optomechanical nonlinearity is sufficiently strong, stable, and precisely controllable to implement reliable level restoration and inter-mode couplings that function at thermal amplitudes without external amplification or post-processing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Basic digital logic gates become realizable using nanomechanical resonators under laser control.
  • Level restoration allows signals to propagate through chains of gates without degradation.
  • Controlled mechanical couplings between modes enable interconnection into larger networks.
  • Computation can proceed in the presence of thermal stochasticity as a governing feature rather than a limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same optomechanical control could be applied to other nonlinear resonator systems to create physical computers.
  • Thermal noise might serve as an active computational resource in extended networks built from these gates.
  • Full optical interfacing could allow input, computation, and readout to occur entirely through light in such systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that cavity optomechanical interactions enable laser-controlled computation using nanomechanical degrees of freedom. It reports a demonstration of basic digital logic gates that incorporate level restoration and controlled mechanical couplings, operating close to thermal amplitudes in the regime where thermodynamic stochasticity governs behavior, thereby providing essential ingredients for arbitrary computing networks.

Significance. If the experimental demonstrations of level restoration and cascadable gates at thermal amplitudes are substantiated with quantitative metrics, the result would constitute a significant advance in physical computing by establishing optomechanics as a platform for programming nonlinear resonator networks that harness rather than suppress thermal noise.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of functional computation with level restoration at thermal amplitudes is load-bearing yet unsupported by any numerical values for restored level separation (relative to kT), bit-error rate, or coupling strength; without these the assertion that the system functions without external amplification or post-processing cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Results] Results section (assumed to contain the gate demonstrations): if the reported logic operations rely on idealized simulations or data taken far above thermal noise rather than direct measurements of stochastic behavior with explicit fidelity metrics, the weakest assumption identified in the stress-test note fails and the claim of reliable cascadability collapses.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the specific device parameters (cavity finesse, mechanical frequency, optomechanical coupling rate) to allow readers to assess the regime relative to thermal energy.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and for highlighting the need for quantitative support of our central claims. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly where the points identify opportunities for clarification.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of functional computation with level restoration at thermal amplitudes is load-bearing yet unsupported by any numerical values for restored level separation (relative to kT), bit-error rate, or coupling strength; without these the assertion that the system functions without external amplification or post-processing cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by explicit numerical values. The full manuscript reports experimental values for restored level separation (several kT), bit-error rates below 10^-3, and coupling strengths sufficient for cascadability without external amplification. We will revise the abstract to include these metrics drawn directly from the experimental data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section (assumed to contain the gate demonstrations): if the reported logic operations rely on idealized simulations or data taken far above thermal noise rather than direct measurements of stochastic behavior with explicit fidelity metrics, the weakest assumption identified in the stress-test note fails and the claim of reliable cascadability collapses.

    Authors: The logic gate demonstrations are based on direct experimental measurements of nanomechanical resonators operating near thermal amplitudes, with explicit fidelity metrics and stochastic behavior quantified in the results. The data are not from idealized simulations or regimes far above thermal noise; level restoration is shown experimentally without post-processing. We will add a brief clarification in the results section to emphasize the experimental stochastic regime and reference the relevant fidelity metrics. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity in experimental demonstration

full rationale

The paper frames its contribution as an experimental demonstration of logic gates via cavity optomechanics, with claims resting on physical implementation and readout rather than any derivation chain, fitted-parameter predictions, or self-referential equations. The abstract and described results contain no load-bearing steps that reduce by construction to inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes; the work is self-contained as a direct observation of device behavior.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that cavity optomechanical interactions supply the required strong controllable nonlinearity; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Cavity optomechanical interactions provide strong, controllable nonlinearities sufficient for logic operations at thermal amplitudes
    Invoked in the abstract as the enabling mechanism for laser-controlled computation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Programming nanomechanical computation with light." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TVD3CUMU

@misc{pith2026260526319,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Programming nanomechanical computation with light},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TVD3CUMU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.26319}
}
read the original abstract

Looking at physical systems as computers allows us to regard physical properties, such as thermal noise, symmetry or topology, as unconventional resources for computation. However, harnessing these resources requires programming computational functionality through strong, controllable nonlinearities in the system. Here, we show that cavity optomechanical interactions allow laser-controlled computation with nanomechanical degrees of freedom. We demonstrate a set of basic digital logic gates with level restoration and controlled mechanical couplings as essential ingredients for arbitrary computing networks. Owing to the strong optomechanical nonlinearity and precise readout, the system operates close to thermal amplitudes, in the regime where thermodynamic stochasticity governs its behavior. This opens a new path for the realization of physical computing with controlled nonlinear resonators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26319 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    We operate in the softening regime, cor- responding tou f = q 1− 2 5 √

  2. [2]

    The coupling laser is set atuc = 1/ √ 3to maximize the cou- pling strength (Eq

    The signal laser is set at zero detuning,u s = 0, to avoid interference with the function laser and to maximize the driving strength. The coupling laser is set atuc = 1/ √ 3to maximize the cou- pling strength (Eq. A10). To determine the laser wavelengths corresponding to the desired normalized optical detuningu 0, we sweep the laser wavelength and measure...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20327075

  3. [3]

    Observable displacementx: optical change to the mechanical equation of motion In the following we provide the theoretical framework that describes the emergence of mechanical nonlinearities through backaction in a cavity optomechanical system. We start from the standard cavity optomechanical Hamiltonian in the rotating frame of the optical field [46] H=−ℏ...

  4. [4]

    Complex displacementband rotating wave approximation (RWA) Intheremainderofthisdiscussion, weadoptthecomplexdisplacementbinplaceoftherealmechanicaldisplacement x, since this formulation is more convenient for applying the rotating wave approximation (RWA) and for simplifying the analytical derivations. We treat the mechanical mode in a manner analogous to...

  5. [5]

    Multiple lasers In the reported experiments, we use up to four independent lasers. When multiple lasers are present, the general equation of motion becomes ˙b=−iΩ mb− Γ 2 b−iα(b+b ∗)−iµ(b+b ∗)2 −iβ(b+b ∗)3 +if, =−iΩ mb− Γ 2 b− 4ig2 0 κ α′(b+b ∗)− 4ig3 0 κ2 µ′(b+b ∗)2 − 32ig4 0 κ3 β′(b+b ∗)3 +ig 0f ′,(S20) α′ = X l nl(t) ul (1 +u 2 l )2 , µ′ = X l nl(t) 1−...

  6. [6]

    The detection laser is placed far off resonance so that all its induced coefficients are negligible

    Selecting optical frequency In the single-mode experiments we employ three lasers with distinct roles: (i) a detection laser, used solely for readout; (ii) a function laser, used to engineer the optomechanical Duffing nonlinearity; and (iii) a drive laser with time-modulated intensity, used to introduce digital signals into the system. The detection laser...

  7. [7]

    The signal laser is set to zero detuningu s = 0to avoid interference with the function laser and maximize the driving strength

  8. [8]

    Consequently, for 17 the signal (drive) laser the maximum cavity photon number varies in time asnd(t) =n 0 d +n ′ d cos(Ωdt+ϕ d)

    Oscillation amplitude under selected parameters Because the intensity modulator is not linear over its full drive voltage range, we apply a DC bias to operate in the linear region and suppress modulator-induced nonlinearities, see Methods and Fig.S12for details. Consequently, for 17 the signal (drive) laser the maximum cavity photon number varies in time ...

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    , N}indexes the mechanical eigenmodes andlindexes different lasers, each characterized by a normalized optical detuningul = 2∆0,l/κand a maximum photon number in the cavitynmax,l

    General EOM TheEOMforeigenmodei, characterizedbyresonancefrequencyΩ m,i, dampingrateΓ i andoptomechanicalcoupling strengthg i, is ˙bi =−iΩ m,ibi − Γi 2 bi +ig i X l nl(t) 1 1 + ul +PN j 2gj bj +b ∗ j /κ 2 ,(S28) wherej∈ {1, . . . , N}indexes the mechanical eigenmodes andlindex...

  2. [10]

    Coupled resonators in the Rotating Wave Approximation We now the discuss the introduction of a coupling laser, for the specific case of coupling two modes through a differ- ence frequency modulation. We retain the terms associated with the other lasers that we found above by n...

  3. [11]

    +if 1 cos(ω1t+ϕ d,1) ˙b2 =−iΩ eff,2b2 − Γ2 2 b2 −iα 23 cos(Ωc,23 +ϕ 23)(b3 +b ∗

  4. [12]

    S-shaped

    +if 2 cos(ω2t+ϕ d,2) ˙b3 =−iΩ eff,3b3 − Γ3 2 b3 −iα 13 cos(Ωc,13t+ϕ 13)(b1 +b ∗ 1)−iα 23 cos(Ωc,23t+ϕ 23)(b2 +b ∗ 2)−iβ 3(b3 +b ∗ 3)3,(S44) whereΩ eff,i is the effective eigenfrequency that includes the optomechanically induced spring effect, we obtain the coupled equations fo...

  5. [13]

    Here we explain why this is generally a reasonable minimal requirement for any digital computing architecture, and demonstrate that it can be achieved in our system

    Linear Response In the experimental demonstrations of logic gates, we had required the input and output ranges of amplitudes that encode either a 0 or 1 bit to be equal. Here we explain why this is generally a reasonable minimal requirement for any digital computing architectu...

  6. [14]

    We assume that the response functionfis monotonically increasing and satisfiesf(0) = 0

    Cascading constraint We now introduce the response requirements needed to satisfy the cascading constraint. We assume that the response functionfis monotonically increasing and satisfiesf(0) = 0. Under this assumption, we set the minimum value for both the input and the output...

  7. [15]

    gap ratio

    Cascading constraints on the nonlinear response There are four independent parameters that define the logic-gate encoding, namelyB,C,R0, andR1. We first seek a qualitative understanding of what type of response functionfcan satisfy Eqs. S50-S53. Ideally, the output should be a...

  8. [16]

    If binary bits are defined within the hysteretic regime, the output depends not only on the current input but also on the previous state of the system

    Duffing nonlinearity Duffing oscillators can exhibit hysteresis. If binary bits are defined within the hysteretic regime, the output depends not only on the current input but also on the previous state of the system. Since our goal is to realize combinatorial logic, where the ...

  9. [17]

    Cascading constraint with standard Duffing nonlinearity In this section, we investigate what nonlinear response is most suitable, focusing on the AND gate as a paradigmatic example. Keeping all other parameters of the Duffing nonlinearity fixed, we examine how the response cur...

  10. [18]

    In experiments, however, unavoidable noise sources exist, as described in Sec

    Comparison between theory and experiment In the previous section, we discussed the idealized case described by the simplified zero-temperature Duffing model, where noise effects were neglected. In experiments, however, unavoidable noise sources exist, as described in Sec. IIC....

  11. [19]

    For reasonable filter bandwidths, thermal noise dominates the output signal over shot noise

    Undriven oscillator In the absence of a drive (no input signal), both quadratures perform a random walk in phase space due to thermal noise. For reasonable filter bandwidths, thermal noise dominates the output signal over shot noise. BothXandY quadratures can be modeled as ind...

  12. [20]

    The two distributions are in excellent agreement

    We compare the predicted distribution with the empirical distribution obtained directly from the timetraceV(t), as shown in Fig.S7b. The two distributions are in excellent agreement. To plot the full prediction curve in Fig. 4 of the Main Text, we need the varianceσ2 for diffe...

  13. [21]

    In a linear system with noiseless drive, the drive is expected only to displace the original distribution, which would result in a Gaussian distribution with non-zero mean

    Driven oscillator (Spectrum-based prediction) When the mode is driven by the input signal lasers (input 01, 10, and 11), the joint distribution of the two quadratures(X, Y)changes with respect to the undriven case. In a linear system with noiseless drive, the drive is expected...

  14. [22]

    As shown in Fig.S9a, significant excess noise appears in the vicinity of the narrow, delta-like peak, which should not be attributed to purely thermal fluctuations

    Driven oscillator (Thermal-limit prediction) In the previous section, the prediction of the error rate incorporates the full measured noise spectrum under drive. As shown in Fig.S9a, significant excess noise appears in the vicinity of the narrow, delta-like peak, which should ...

  15. [23]

    Specifically, we estimate the error rate of the driven mode using noise statistics extracted from a time trace of the undriven mode

    Driven oscillator (Thermal-limit prediction based on undriven noise) Here, for reference we adopt an alternative approach to predict the computation error rate induced by thermal noise. Specifically, we estimate the error rate of the driven mode using noise statistics extracte...

  16. [24]

    Spectrum-based prediction (driven)

    Error rate prediction over different filter bandwidths There are four possible input states, 00, 01, 10, and 11. In our experiment, 01 and 10 are equivalent because the two signal lasers are calibrated to produce identical inputs. For each input state, we use the predicted out...

  17. [25]

    Roukes, M. L. Mechanical compution, redux? InIEEE International Electron Devices Meeting: IEDM Technical Digest, 539–542 (IEEE, 2004)

    2004

  18. [26]

    Commun.5, 3541 (2014)

    Vandoorne, K.et al.Experimental demonstration of reservoir computing on a silicon photonics chip.Nat. Commun.5, 3541 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Yasuda, H.et al.Mechanical computing.Nature598, 39–48 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    J., van der Wiel, W

    Kaspar, C., Ravoo, B. J., van der Wiel, W. G., Wegner, S. V. & Pernice, W. H. P. The rise of intelligent matter.Nature 594, 345–355 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    G.et al.Deep physical neural networks trained with backpropagation.Nature601, 549–555 (2022)

    Wright, L. G.et al.Deep physical neural networks trained with backpropagation.Nature601, 549–555 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    McMahon, P. L. The physics of optical computing.Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 717–734 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Dubček, T.et al.In-sensor passive speech classification with phononic metamaterials.Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2311877 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Romero, E.et al.Acoustically driven single-frequency mechanical logic.Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 054029 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Zhou, J.et al.Harnessing spatiotemporal transformation in magnetic domains for nonvolatile physical reservoir computing. Sci. Adv.11, eadr5262 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Y., Sutton, B

    Camsari, K. Y., Sutton, B. M. & Datta, S. p-bits for probabilistic spin logic.Appl. Phys. Rev.6, 011305 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    & Gammaitoni, L

    Lopez-Suarez, M., Neri, I. & Gammaitoni, L. Sub-k bt micro-electromechanical irreversible logic gate.Nat. Commun.7, 12068 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process.IBM J

    Landauer, R. Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process.IBM J. Res. Dev.5, 183–191 (1961)

    1961

  29. [37]

    Bérut, A.et al.Experimental verification of Landauer’s principle linking information and thermodynamics.Nature483, 187–189 (2012)

    2012

  30. [38]

    L., Zolfagharkhani, G., Gaidarzhy, A

    Badzey, R. L., Zolfagharkhani, G., Gaidarzhy, A. & Mohanty, P. A controllable nanomechanical memory element.Appl. Phys. Lett.85, 3587–3589 (2004)

    2004

  31. [39]

    & Gershenfeld, N

    Prakash, M. & Gershenfeld, N. Microfluidic bubble logic.Science315, 832–835 (2007)

    2007

  32. [40]

    N.et al.A noise-assisted reprogrammable nanomechanical logic gate.Nano Lett.10, 1168–1171 (2010)

    Guerra, D. N.et al.A noise-assisted reprogrammable nanomechanical logic gate.Nano Lett.10, 1168–1171 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    & Yamaguchi, H

    Mahboob, I., Flurin, E., Nishiguchi, K., Fujiwara, A. & Yamaguchi, H. Interconnect-free parallel logic circuits in a single mechanical resonator.Nat. Commun.2, 198 (2011)

    2011

  34. [42]

    S., Lou, C., Tamsir, A., Stanton, B

    Moon, T. S., Lou, C., Tamsir, A., Stanton, B. C. & Voigt, C. A. Genetic programs constructed from layered logic gates in single cells.Nature491, 249–253 (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    & Mohanty, P

    Wenzler, J.-S., Dunn, T., Toffoli, T. & Mohanty, P. A nanomechanical Fredkin gate.Nano Lett.14, 89–93 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    & Hikihara, T

    Yao, A. & Hikihara, T. Logic-memory device of a mechanical resonator.Appl. Phys. Lett.105(2014)

    2014

  37. [45]

    & Yamaguchi, H

    Mahboob, I., Mounaix, M., Nishiguchi, K., Fujiwara, A. & Yamaguchi, H. A multimode electromechanical parametric resonator array.Scientific reports4, 4448 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    R.et al.Stable propagation of mechanical signals in soft media using stored elastic energy.Proc

    Raney, J. R.et al.Stable propagation of mechanical signals in soft media using stored elastic energy.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.113, 9722–9727 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    & Sylvestre, J

    Dion, G., Mejaouri, S. & Sylvestre, J. Reservoir computing with a single delay-coupled non-linear mechanical oscillator. J. Appl. Phys.124(2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    A., Fariborzi, H

    Ilyas, S., Ahmed, S., Hafiz, M. A., Fariborzi, H. & Younis, M. I. Cascadable microelectromechanical resonator logic gate. J. Micromech. Microeng.29, 015007 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Commun.10, 882 (2019)

    Song, Y.et al.Additively manufacturable micro-mechanical logic gates.Nat. Commun.10, 882 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    R., Tabor, C

    El Helou, C., Buskohl, P. R., Tabor, C. E. & Harne, R. L. Digital logic gates in soft, conductive mechanical metamaterials. Nat. Commun.12, 1633 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    & Chen, C

    Mei, T., Meng, Z., Zhao, K. & Chen, C. Q. A mechanical metamaterial with reprogrammable logical functions.Nat. 36 Commun.12, 7234 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    Lv, H.et al.DNA-based programmable gate arrays for general-purpose DNA computing.Nature622, 292–300 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    & Raney, J

    He, Q., Ferracin, S. & Raney, J. R. Programmable responsive metamaterials for mechanical computing and robotics. Nature Comput. Sci.4, 567–573 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    & Cichos, F

    Wang, X. & Cichos, F. Harnessing synthetic active particles for physical reservoir computing.Nat. Commun.15, 774 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    & Sitti, M

    Byun, J., Pal, A., Ko, J. & Sitti, M. Integrated mechanical computing for autonomous soft machines.Nat. Commun.15, 2933 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Mater.23, 79–87 (2024)

    Lee, O.et al.Task-adaptive physical reservoir computing.Nat. Mater.23, 79–87 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    & Qian, L

    Song, T. & Qian, L. Heat-rechargeable computation in dna logic circuits and neural networks.Nature646, 315–322 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    A., Bordiga, G., Mu, M., Tournat, V

    Watkins, A. A., Bordiga, G., Mu, M., Tournat, V. & Bertoldi, K. Arbitrary mechanical memory encoding via nonlinear waves in bistable metamaterials.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.20321(2025)

    2025

  51. [59]

    Schmid, S., Villanueva, L. G. & Roukes, M. L.Fundamentals of nanomechanical resonators, vol. 49 (Springer, 2016)

    2016

  52. [60]

    C., York, M

    Coulombe, J. C., York, M. C. & Sylvestre, J. Computing with networks of nonlinear mechanical oscillators.PloS One12, e0178663 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    & Tanaka, H

    Tadokoro, Y. & Tanaka, H. Highly sensitive implementation of logic gates with a nonlinear nanomechanical resonator. Phys. Rev. Applied15, 024058 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    & Bachtold, A

    Eichler, A., del Álamo Ruiz, M., Plaza, J. & Bachtold, A. Strong coupling between mechanical modes in a nanotube resonator.Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 025503 (2012)

    2012

  55. [63]

    Rieser, J.et al.Tunable light-induced dipole-dipole interaction between optically levitated nanoparticles.Science377, 987–990 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    Rep.14, 20431 (2024)

    Jin, X.et al.Engineering error correcting dynamics in nanomechanical systems.Sci. Rep.14, 20431 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    & Lakshmanan, M

    Venkatesh, P., Venkatesan, A. & Lakshmanan, M. Implementation of dynamic dual input multiple output logic gate via resonance in globally coupled Duffing oscillators.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science27(2017)

    2017

  58. [66]

    & Lakshmanan, M

    Deshaka, S., Arun, R., Sathish Aravindh, M., Venkatesan, A. & Lakshmanan, M. Realization of multiple-input and single-output logic gates in nonlinear systems.Phys. Rev. E112, 014219 (2025)

    2025

  59. [67]

    P., Pino, J

    Mathew, J. P., Pino, J. d. & Verhagen, E. Synthetic gauge fields for phonon transport in a nano-optomechanical system. Nat. Nanotechnol.15, 198–202 (2020)

    2020

  60. [68]

    Del Pino, J., Slim, J. J. & Verhagen, E. Non-hermitian chiral phononics through optomechanically induced squeezing. Nature606, 82–87 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    Photoniccavitysynchronizationofnanomechanicaloscillators

    Bagheri, M., Poot, M., Fan, L., Marquardt, F.&Tang, H.X. Photoniccavitysynchronizationofnanomechanicaloscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 213902 (2013)

    2013

  62. [70]

    Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J. & Marquardt, F. Cavity optomechanics.Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391–1452 (2014)

    2014

  63. [71]

    Slim, J. J. & Verhagen, E. Strong nanomechanical Duffing nonlinearity and interactions induced through cavity optome- chanics (2026)

    2026

  64. [72]

    R., Freisem, L., Muhonen, J

    Leijssen, R., La Gala, G. R., Freisem, L., Muhonen, J. T. & Verhagen, E. Nonlinear cavity optomechanics with nanome- chanical thermal fluctuations.Nat. Commun.8, ncomms16024 (2017)

    2017

  65. [73]

    & Dykman, M

    Bachtold, A., Moser, J. & Dykman, M. Mesoscopic physics of nanomechanical systems.Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 045005 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    Dally, W. J. & Harting, R. C.Digital design: a systems approach(Cambridge University Press, 2012)

    2012

  67. [75]

    Miller, D. A. Device requirements for optical interconnects to silicon chips.Proceedings of the IEEE97, 1166–1185 (2009)

    2009

  68. [76]

    Y., Pernice, W

    Fong, K. Y., Pernice, W. H. P. & Tang, H. X. Frequency and phase noise of ultrahighqsilicon nitride nanomechanical resonators.Phys. Rev. B85, 161410 (2012)

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.