pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26728 · v1 · pith:REKKPDLHnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · ✦ hep-ph

Attractors in a Generalized Relativistic Second Order Spin Hydrodynamics

Qi Zhou , Duan She , Ben-Wei Zhang , Enke Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 17:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords spin hydrodynamicsattractorsBjorken flowsecond-order hydrodynamicsrelativistic hydrodynamicsspin polarizationheavy-ion collisions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Source-like driving terms modify leading corrections to spin attractors without changing fixed points, while rotational stress self-feedback alters early-time fixed point structure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the attractor equation for spin density in (0+1)D Bjorken flow within generalized second-order relativistic spin hydrodynamics, using Zubarev's formalism in the spin probe limit and retaining nonlinear response plus nonlocal memory effects. It separates the effects of different second-order terms on the early-time fixed points and attractor solution, then shows their impact on subleading late-time asymptotics in the conformal limit. A reader cares because attractor behavior determines how initial spin polarization evolves into observable signals in heavy-ion collisions, independent of many microscopic details. The analysis identifies which corrections dominate at early versus late times and how they influence branch selection.

Core claim

Using Zubarev's non-equilibrium statistical operator formalism in the spin probe limit, the authors derive (0+1)D Bjorken flow equations for spin hydrodynamics retaining second-order corrections including nonlinear response and nonlocal memory effects. They analyze the early time fixed point structure and find that source-like driving terms modify the leading correction to the attractor solution without changing the fixed point structure, whereas self feedback terms involving the rotational stress tensor modify the dominant balance and the early time fixed point structure. In the conformal limit, the newly added terms affect the first subleading asymptotics without changing the leading late

What carries the argument

The attractor equation obtained from the relaxation constitutive relations for spin density, together with its early-time and late-time fixed-point analysis.

If this is right

  • Early-time attractor solutions and branch selection depend on whether corrections are source-like or involve rotational stress self-feedback.
  • Late-time leading asymptotic branches remain unchanged by the additional second-order terms.
  • Subleading corrections to late-time behavior are modified by the new terms in the conformal limit.
  • A single framework now connects early-time and late-time attractor dynamics for spin density.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar term-by-term distinctions may guide which second-order contributions to retain in full 3+1D numerical simulations of spin hydrodynamics.
  • The separation of source versus feedback effects could help isolate initial-condition dependence from dynamical evolution in spin polarization observables.
  • Testing the same equations with non-conformal equations of state would show whether late-time leading branches stay robust beyond the conformal case.

Load-bearing premise

The spin probe limit holds and Zubarev's non-equilibrium statistical operator formalism correctly captures second-order gradient corrections that include nonlinear response and nonlocal memory effects.

What would settle it

Numerical solution of the derived attractor equation that either confirms or fails to confirm a change in the early-time fixed points when self-feedback terms from the rotational stress tensor are included.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26728 by Ben-Wei Zhang, Duan She, Enke Wang, Qi Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Attractor solutions for Case A, B, and C. Arrows show the flow fields, red solid curves denote [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the attractor of spin density in relativistic spin hydrodynamics using Zubarev's non-equilibrium statistical operator formalism in the spin probe limit. We derive the (0+1)D Bjorken flow equations and the associated attractor equation while retaining second order gradient corrections in the relevant relaxation constitutive equations including couplings associated with nonlinear response and nonlocal memory effects. We analyze the early time fixed point structure and analytically determine the early time attractor solution, thereby clarifying branch selection and the role of different dynamical corrections. We find that source-like driving terms modify the leading correction to the attractor solution without changing the fixed point structure, whereas self feedback terms involving the rotational stress tensor modify the dominant balance and modify the early time fixed point structure. We further study the late time asymptotic behavior in the conformal limit and show that the newly added terms affect the first subleading asymptotics without changing the leading late time branches. These results provide a unified picture of early and late time attractor dynamics in the conformal limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives (0+1)D Bjorken flow equations and the associated attractor equation for spin density in relativistic second-order spin hydrodynamics within Zubarev's non-equilibrium statistical operator formalism, restricted to the spin probe limit. It retains second-order gradient corrections including nonlinear response and nonlocal memory effects, analytically determines the early-time fixed-point structure and attractor solution, and examines late-time asymptotics in the conformal limit. The central results are that source-like driving terms modify only the leading correction to the attractor without altering fixed points, while self-feedback terms involving the rotational stress tensor modify the dominant balance and early-time fixed-point structure, and the new terms affect only first subleading late-time asymptotics without changing leading branches.

Significance. If the derivations are internally consistent, the work provides an analytical classification of how distinct classes of second-order corrections influence early- and late-time attractor dynamics in spin hydrodynamics. The explicit early-time fixed-point analysis and late-time branch identification constitute a concrete advance for modeling spin polarization observables.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of the attractor equation and early-time fixed-point analysis] The central distinction between source-like driving terms and self-feedback terms from the rotational stress tensor (which are reported to modify the early-time fixed-point structure) is drawn under the spin probe limit. No explicit ordering argument is supplied showing that the rotational stress contributions remain at leading order when spin density is parametrically small, nor that the probe expansion commutes with the gradient expansion used to construct the attractor equation. This ordering must be demonstrated for the reported change in fixed-point structure to be robust.
  2. [Late-time asymptotics in the conformal limit] The late-time asymptotic analysis in the conformal limit asserts that newly added terms affect only the first subleading correction without altering the leading branches. The manuscript should supply the explicit subleading expansion (including the coefficient of the first correction) to substantiate this claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the relaxation constitutive relations should be introduced with explicit reference to the underlying Zubarev operator expansion to avoid ambiguity in the nonlinear and memory terms.
  2. Figure captions for the early-time attractor trajectories should state the precise initial conditions and parameter values used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of the attractor equation and early-time fixed-point analysis] The central distinction between source-like driving terms and self-feedback terms from the rotational stress tensor (which are reported to modify the early-time fixed-point structure) is drawn under the spin probe limit. No explicit ordering argument is supplied showing that the rotational stress contributions remain at leading order when spin density is parametrically small, nor that the probe expansion commutes with the gradient expansion used to construct the attractor equation. This ordering must be demonstrated for the reported change in fixed-point structure to be robust.

    Authors: We thank the referee for identifying this gap in the presentation. While the spin probe limit treats the spin density as parametrically small and the rotational stress tensor enters at the same gradient order in the constitutive relations, we agree that an explicit ordering argument is required to confirm robustness. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new paragraph immediately following the definition of the spin probe limit, demonstrating that the probe expansion commutes with the gradient expansion for the attractor equation and that the self-feedback terms remain leading-order contributions to the fixed-point structure. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Late-time asymptotics in the conformal limit] The late-time asymptotic analysis in the conformal limit asserts that newly added terms affect only the first subleading correction without altering the leading branches. The manuscript should supply the explicit subleading expansion (including the coefficient of the first correction) to substantiate this claim.

    Authors: We agree that the claim would be strengthened by an explicit subleading expansion. In the revised manuscript we will derive and display the first subleading correction to the late-time attractor solution in the conformal limit, including the explicit coefficient multiplying the leading correction term, and we will update the text to reference this expansion directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation self-contained from formalism

full rationale

The paper derives the (0+1)D Bjorken flow and attractor equations from Zubarev's non-equilibrium statistical operator in the spin probe limit, retaining second-order gradient corrections including nonlinear and memory effects. Early-time fixed-point analysis and late-time asymptotics are obtained analytically from these constitutive relations. No self-definitional steps, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear. The central claims follow directly from the chosen equations and expansions without reduction to inputs by construction. The spin probe limit is an explicit modeling assumption, not a derived result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5698 in / 1012 out tokens · 29634 ms · 2026-06-29T17:17:49.009667+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 17 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Globally Polarized Quark-gluon Plasma in Non-central A+A Collisions

    Z.-T. Liang and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 102301 (2005), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 039901 (2006)], arXiv:nucl-th/0410079

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  2. [2]

    Spin Alignment of Vector Mesons in Non-central A+A Collisions

    Z.-T. Liang and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Lett. B629, 20 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0411101

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    Relativistic distribution function for particles with spin at local thermodynamical equilibrium

    F. Becattini, V. Chandra, L. Del Zanna, and E. Grossi, Annals Phys.338, 32 (2013), arXiv:1303.3431 [nucl-th]. 21

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Global $\Lambda$ hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), Nature548, 62 (2017), arXiv:1701.06657 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Adamet al.(STAR), Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR), Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 162301 (2021), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 131, 089901 (2023)], arXiv:2012.13601 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    M. S. Abdallahet al.(STAR), Nature614, 244 (2023), arXiv:2204.02302 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    M. I. Abdulhamidet al.(STAR), Phys. Rev. C108, 014910 (2023), arXiv:2305.08705 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    H.-H. Peng, S. Wu, R.-j. Wang, D. She, and S. Pu, Phys. Rev. D107, 096010 (2023), arXiv:2211.11286 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Liang, J

    Z.-T. Liang, J. Song, I. Upsal, Q. Wang, and Z.-B. Xu, Chin. Phys. C45, 014102 (2021), arXiv:1912.10223 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Study of Lambda polarization in relativistic nuclear collisions at sqrt{s}_NN = 7.7-200 GeV

    I. Karpenko and F. Becattini, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 213 (2017), arXiv:1610.04717 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 042303 (2023), arXiv:2204.10171 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Gao, G.-L

    J.-H. Gao, G.-L. Ma, S. Pu, and Q. Wang, Nucl. Sci. Tech.31, 90 (2020), arXiv:2005.10432 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Becattini and M

    F. Becattini and M. A. Lisa, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 395 (2020), arXiv:2003.03640 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Becattini, Rept

    F. Becattini, Rept. Prog. Phys.85, 122301 (2022), arXiv:2204.01144 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Hidaka, S

    Y. Hidaka, S. Pu, Q. Wang, and D.-L. Yang, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.127, 103989 (2022), arXiv:2201.07644 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Becattini, M

    F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, T. Niida, S. Pu, A.-H. Tang, and Q. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33, 2430006 (2024), arXiv:2402.04540 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Relativistic fluid dynamics with spin

    W. Florkowski, B. Friman, A. Jaiswal, and E. Speranza, Phys. Rev. C97, 041901 (2018), arXiv:1705.00587 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Florkowski, A

    W. Florkowski, A. Kumar, and R. Ryblewski, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.108, 103709 (2019), arXiv:1811.04409 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Li and H.-U

    S. Li and H.-U. Yee, Phys. Rev. D100, 056022 (2019), arXiv:1905.10463 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Hongo, X.-G

    M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, M. Kaminski, M. Stephanov, and H.-U. Yee, JHEP08, 263 (2022), arXiv:2201.12390 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Weickgenannt, D

    N. Weickgenannt, D. Wagner, E. Speranza, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D106, 096014 (2022), arXiv:2203.04766 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Bhadury, W

    S. Bhadury, W. Florkowski, A. Jaiswal, A. Kumar, and R. Ryblewski, Phys. Lett. B814, 136096 (2021), arXiv:2002.03937 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    S. Shi, C. Gale, and S. Jeon, Phys. Rev. C103, 044906 (2021), arXiv:2008.08618 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Bhadury, W

    S. Bhadury, W. Florkowski, A. Jaiswal, A. Kumar, and R. Ryblewski, Phys. Rev. D103, 014030 (2021), arXiv:2008.10976 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Peng, J.-J

    H.-H. Peng, J.-J. Zhang, X.-L. Sheng, and Q. Wang, Chin. Phys. Lett.38, 116701 (2021), arXiv:2107.00448 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Weickgenannt, D

    N. Weickgenannt, D. Wagner, and E. Speranza, Phys. Rev. D105, 116026 (2022), arXiv:2204.01797 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Weickgenannt, D

    N. Weickgenannt, D. Wagner, E. Speranza, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D106, L091901 (2022), arXiv:2208.01955 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Fate of spin polarization in a relativistic fluid: An entropy-current analysis

    K. Hattori, M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, M. Matsuo, and H. Taya, Phys. Lett. B795, 100 (2019), arXiv:1901.06615 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Fukushima and S

    K. Fukushima and S. Pu, Phys. Lett. B817, 136346 (2021), arXiv:2010.01608 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    S. Li, M. A. Stephanov, and H.-U. Yee, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 082302 (2021), arXiv:2011.12318 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    D. She, A. Huang, D. Hou, and J. Liao, Sci. Bull.67, 2265 (2022), arXiv:2105.04060 [nucl-th]. 22

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Hongo, X.-G

    M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, M. Kaminski, M. Stephanov, and H.-U. Yee, JHEP11, 150 (2021), arXiv:2107.14231 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Z. Cao, K. Hattori, M. Hongo, X.-G. Huang, and H. Taya, PTEP2022, 071D01 (2022), arXiv:2205.08051 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Hu, Phys

    J. Hu, Phys. Rev. C107, 024915 (2023), arXiv:2209.10979 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Biswas, A

    R. Biswas, A. Daher, A. Das, W. Florkowski, and R. Ryblewski, Phys. Rev. D108, 014024 (2023), arXiv:2304.01009 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    A. D. Gallegos and U. G¨ ursoy, JHEP11, 151 (2020), arXiv:2004.05148 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Garbiso and M

    M. Garbiso and M. Kaminski, JHEP12, 112 (2020), arXiv:2007.04345 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    A. D. Gallegos, U. G¨ ursoy, and A. Yarom, SciPost Phys.11, 041 (2021), arXiv:2101.04759 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    A. D. Gallegos, U. Gursoy, and A. Yarom, JHEP05, 139 (2023), arXiv:2203.05044 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    The ideal relativistic fluid limit for a medium with polarization

    D. Montenegro, L. Tinti, and G. Torrieri, Phys. Rev. D96, 056012 (2017), [Addendum: Phys. Rev. D 96, 079901 (2017)], arXiv:1701.08263 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    Montenegro and G

    D. Montenegro and G. Torrieri, Phys. Rev. D102, 036007 (2020), arXiv:2004.10195 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Hu, Phys

    J. Hu, Phys. Rev. D103, 116015 (2021), arXiv:2101.08440 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    She, Y.-W

    D. She, Y.-W. Qiu, and D. Hou, Phys. Rev. D111, 036027 (2025), arXiv:2410.15142 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    She, Y.-W

    D. She, Y.-W. Qiu, Z.-F. Jiang, and D. Hou, Phys. Rev. D112, 096013 (2025), arXiv:2505.01814 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    M. P. Heller and M. Spalinski, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 072501 (2015), arXiv:1503.07514 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    M. P. Heller and M. Spali´ nski, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 072501 (2015)

    2015

  47. [47]

    G. S. Denicol and J. Noronha, (2016), arXiv:1608.07869 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, V. Svensson, and B. Withers, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 122302 (2022), arXiv:2110.07621 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    M. P. Heller, A. Kurkela, M. Spali´ nski, and V. Svensson, Phys. Rev. D97, 091503 (2018), arXiv:1609.04803 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Chattopadhyay, S

    C. Chattopadhyay, S. Jaiswal, L. Du, U. Heinz, and S. Pal, Phys. Lett. B824, 136820 (2022), arXiv:2107.05500 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Jaiswal, S

    S. Jaiswal, S. Pal, C. Chattopadhyay, L. Du, and U. Heinz, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp.16, 1 (2023), arXiv:2208.00744 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Jaiswal, J.-P

    S. Jaiswal, J.-P. Blaizot, R. S. Bhalerao, Z. Chen, A. Jaiswal, and L. Yan, Phys. Rev. C106, 044912 (2022), arXiv:2208.02750 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    The anisotropic non-equilibrium hydrodynamic attractor

    M. Strickland, J. Noronha, and G. Denicol, Phys. Rev. D97, 036020 (2018), arXiv:1709.06644 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Romatschke, Phys

    P. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 012301 (2018)

    2018

  55. [55]

    G. S. Denicol and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D99, 116004 (2019)

    2019

  56. [56]

    Du, X.-G

    Z. Du, X.-G. Huang, and H. Taya, Phys. Rev. D104, 056022 (2021)

    2021

  57. [57]

    Romatschke, JHEP12, 079 (2017)

    P. Romatschke, JHEP12, 079 (2017)

    2017

  58. [58]

    Chen and L

    Z. Chen and L. Yan, Phys. Rev. C105, 024910 (2022)

    2022

  59. [59]

    Strickland, JHEP12, 128 (2018), arXiv:1809.01200 [nucl-th]

    M. Strickland, JHEP12, 128 (2018), arXiv:1809.01200 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Almaalol, A

    D. Almaalol, A. Kurkela, and M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 122302 (2020), arXiv:2004.05195 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    G. S. Denicol and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 152301 (2020), arXiv:1908.09957 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Fluid dynamics of out of equilibrium boost invariant plasmas

    J.-P. Blaizot and L. Yan, Phys. Lett. B780, 283 (2018), arXiv:1712.03856 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Blaizot and L

    J.-P. Blaizot and L. Yan, Phys. Rev. C104, 055201 (2021), arXiv:2106.10508 [nucl-th]. 23

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    G. S. Denicol and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D97, 056021 (2018), arXiv:1711.01657 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    Behtash, C

    A. Behtash, C. N. Cruz-Camacho, S. Kamata, and M. Martinez, Phys. Lett. B797, 134914 (2019), arXiv:1805.07881 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    Far-from-equilibrium attractors and nonlinear dynamical systems approach to the Gubser flow

    A. Behtash, C. N. Cruz-Camacho, and M. Martinez, Phys. Rev. D97, 044041 (2018), arXiv:1711.01745 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    Dynamical systems and nonlinear transient rheology of the far-from-equilibrium Bjorken flow

    A. Behtash, S. Kamata, M. Martinez, and H. Shi, Phys. Rev. D99, 116012 (2019), arXiv:1901.08632 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    Boguslavski, A

    K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, F. Lindenbauer, and J. Peuron, Phys. Lett. B852, 138623 (2024), arXiv:2312.11252 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Boguslavski, A

    K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, F. Lindenbauer, and J. Peuron, (2024), arXiv:2401.09088 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Brewer, L

    J. Brewer, L. Yan, and Y. Yin, Phys. Lett. B816, 136189 (2021)

    2021

  71. [71]

    Rajagopal, B

    K. Rajagopal, B. Scheihing-Hitschfeld, and R. Steinhorst, (2024), arXiv:2405.17545 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    M. P. Heller, R. Jefferson, M. Spali´ nski, and V. Svensson, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 132301 (2020)

    2020

  73. [73]

    Spali´ nski, (2025), arXiv:2508.21039 [nucl-th]

    M. Spali´ nski, (2025), arXiv:2508.21039 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    X. Du, M. P. Heller, S. Schlichting, and V. Svensson, Phys. Rev. D106, 014016 (2022), arXiv:2203.16549 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium -- Ten Years of Progress in Theory and Numerical Simulations of Nuclear Collisions

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke,Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium(Cam- bridge University Press, 2019) arXiv:1712.05815 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Soloviev, Eur

    A. Soloviev, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 319 (2022), arXiv:2109.15081 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Jankowski and M

    J. Jankowski and M. Spali´ nski, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.132, 104048 (2023), arXiv:2303.09414 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    D.-L. Wang, L. Yan, and S. Pu, Phys. Rev. D111, 034033 (2025), arXiv:2408.03781 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    G.-H. Li, X. Ren, D.-L. Wang, and S. Pu, (2026), arXiv:2603.27182 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  80. [80]

    Xie, D.-L

    X.-Q. Xie, D.-L. Wang, C. Yang, and S. Pu, Phys. Rev. D108, 094031 (2023), arXiv:2306.13880 [hep-ph]. 24

    work page arXiv 2023