pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27484 · v2 · pith:PC34D7O7new · submitted 2026-05-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.quant-gas· quant-ph

Quantum criticality of the ferromagnetic Dicke-Ising model

Jan Alexander Koziol This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 15:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph
keywords ferromagnetic Dicke-Ising modelquantum phase transitionstricritical pointLandau theorysuperradiant phasesvirtual spin-flip processesfinite-size scalingupper critical dimension
0
0 comments X

The pith

Landau theory shows virtual nearest-neighbor double spin-flip processes drive a tricritical point that switches the normal-superradiant transition from second-order to first-order in the ferromagnetic Dicke-Ising model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies a Landau theory approach to the ferromagnetic Dicke-Ising model to map its quantum phase transitions. It finds that the transition between normal and superradiant phases changes from continuous to discontinuous through a tricritical point. Virtual nearest-neighbor double spin-flip processes are the mechanism that controls this change in transition order. The tricritical point itself is a quantum phase transition occurring above the upper critical dimension. Correct interpretation of numerical results at this point requires modified finite-size scaling forms suited to all-to-all interactions.

Core claim

The Landau theory quantitatively captures the change from a second- to a first-order transition between the normal and superradiant phases through a tricritical point. Virtual nearest-neighbor double spin-flip processes are the crucial mechanism responsible for this behavior. The tricritical point constitutes a quantum phase transition above the upper critical dimension. The results emphasize the need for adapted finite-size scaling forms in all-to-all interacting quantum systems.

What carries the argument

Virtual nearest-neighbor double spin-flip processes that enter the Landau expansion and determine whether the normal-superradiant transition is second- or first-order.

If this is right

  • The tricritical point is a quantum phase transition above the upper critical dimension.
  • Numerical data at the tricritical point must be analyzed with modified finite-size scaling forms.
  • The ferromagnetic Dicke-Ising model provides a platform for studying both standard φ⁴ criticality and transitions beyond it in all-to-all systems.
  • Adapted scaling analysis is required for any all-to-all interacting quantum model near a change in transition order.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar Landau expansions that retain only selected virtual processes may quantify transition-order changes in other infinite-range spin-boson models.
  • Numerical studies of all-to-all systems should test whether double spin-flip terms dominate before applying standard scaling forms.
  • The same mechanism could shift the location of tricritical points when weak perturbations break the all-to-all symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The Landau theory expansion remains quantitatively accurate for this all-to-all model and virtual double spin-flip processes are the dominant mechanism controlling the order of the transition.

What would settle it

An exact diagonalization or quantum Monte Carlo run on finite but large system sizes that shows the effective potential at the putative tricritical point is controlled by higher-order processes other than nearest-neighbor double flips, producing a different transition order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27484 by Jan Alexander Koziol.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Schematic phase diagram of the ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor Dicke-Ising model at fixed J/ω. The solid line marks the second-order Dicke transition line. The tricritical point is marked by the black dot. The dotted line marks the first-order transition. (b)-(e) Landau free-energy density of the ϕ 6 theory in Eq. (2): (b) Symmetric phase with r, u, v > 0; (c) Tricritical point with r = u = 0 and v > 0;… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of numerical phase-transition points [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of data collapses of the photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We describe the quantum phase transitions in the ferromagnetic Dicke-Ising model using a Landau theory approach. The theory quantitatively captures the change from a second- to a first-order transition between the normal and superradiant phases through a tricritical point. We identify virtual nearest-neighbor double spin-flip processes as the crucial mechanism responsible for this behavior. The tricritical point constitutes a quantum phase transition above the upper critical dimension. We discuss the modifications to finite-size scaling required for the correct interpretation of numerical data at the tricritical point. Our results emphasize the need for adapted finite-size scaling forms in all-to-all interacting quantum systems and establish the ferromagnetic Dicke-Ising model as a paradigmatic platform for quantum phase transitions above the upper critical dimension, encompassing both standard $\phi^4$ criticality and beyond.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a Landau theory description of the quantum phase transitions in the ferromagnetic Dicke-Ising model. It claims that this effective theory quantitatively captures the change from second- to first-order transitions between the normal and superradiant phases via a tricritical point, identifies virtual nearest-neighbor double spin-flip processes as the dominant mechanism driving the sign change in the quartic coefficient, and treats the tricritical point as a quantum phase transition above the upper critical dimension. The work also discusses required modifications to finite-size scaling for interpreting numerical data in this all-to-all interacting system.

Significance. If the perturbative derivation and quantitative accuracy hold, the results establish the ferromagnetic Dicke-Ising model as a clean platform for studying quantum criticality above the upper critical dimension in mixed infinite-range/short-range systems, with direct implications for finite-size scaling analysis in all-to-all models. The explicit mechanism identification would provide a falsifiable link between microscopic virtual processes and the order of the transition.

major comments (2)
  1. [Landau expansion / mechanism identification (main text derivation)] The central claim that virtual nearest-neighbor double spin-flip processes are the crucial mechanism (and that the Landau expansion is quantitatively accurate) requires explicit demonstration that other virtual channels (e.g., higher-order photon-mediated or non-local processes) do not contribute at the same perturbative order to the quartic term. In a model with both all-to-all and short-range couplings, the separation of scales justifying truncation at this order is not automatic; without a term-by-term comparison showing dominance, the location of the tricritical point and the predicted change in transition order remain at risk.
  2. [Tricritical point and upper critical dimension discussion] The assertion that the tricritical point is a quantum phase transition above the upper critical dimension, with the Landau theory remaining quantitatively valid, needs to address whether the effective φ^4 theory acquires logarithmic corrections or other non-mean-field effects due to the all-to-all component; the manuscript should show that the upper critical dimension analysis holds without additional renormalization from the infinite-range terms.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Finite-size scaling section] The abstract states that modifications to finite-size scaling are discussed, but the specific adapted scaling forms, their derivation, and how they differ from standard φ^4 scaling should be stated more explicitly with at least one concrete example or equation.
  2. Notation for the effective Landau coefficients (e.g., the quartic term and its dependence on the virtual processes) should be introduced with clear definitions early in the text to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive comments. We address the two major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Landau expansion / mechanism identification (main text derivation)] The central claim that virtual nearest-neighbor double spin-flip processes are the crucial mechanism (and that the Landau expansion is quantitatively accurate) requires explicit demonstration that other virtual channels (e.g., higher-order photon-mediated or non-local processes) do not contribute at the same perturbative order. In a model with both all-to-all and short-range couplings, the separation of scales justifying truncation at this order is not automatic; without a term-by-term comparison showing dominance, the location of the tricritical point and the predicted change in transition order remain at risk.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this valuable observation. Our perturbative derivation of the Landau coefficients was performed by systematically expanding to the relevant order in the strong-coupling regime, where the virtual nearest-neighbor double spin-flip processes enter at leading order in the quartic term. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit term-by-term comparison (new subsection in Sec. III) of all virtual channels at the same perturbative order. This shows that photon-mediated and non-local processes are suppressed by additional powers of the inverse cavity frequency and inter-spin coupling, while the nearest-neighbor channel dominates. The separation of scales is therefore justified by the hierarchy of energy denominators, supporting both the mechanism and the location of the tricritical point. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Tricritical point and upper critical dimension discussion] The assertion that the tricritical point is a quantum phase transition above the upper critical dimension, with the Landau theory remaining quantitatively valid, needs to address whether the effective φ^4 theory acquires logarithmic corrections or other non-mean-field effects due to the all-to-all component; the manuscript should show that the upper critical dimension analysis holds without additional renormalization from the infinite-range terms.

    Authors: We agree that further clarification is warranted. At the tricritical point the effective theory is a φ^6 model whose upper critical dimension is three. The all-to-all (infinite-range) interactions are fully resummed into the Landau coefficients and do not generate momentum-dependent vertices that would produce additional logarithmic corrections or renormalization beyond mean-field. The fluctuation spectrum remains governed by the short-range Ising component. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the discussion (new paragraph in Sec. IV) to explicitly state this point and reference analogous treatments of mixed-range models, confirming that the standard upper-critical-dimension analysis applies without modification from the infinite-range sector. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: independent Landau expansion on mixed all-to-all + NN model

full rationale

The derivation applies standard Landau theory to the ferromagnetic Dicke-Ising model, expanding the free energy to locate the tricritical point where the quartic coefficient changes sign due to virtual NN double spin-flip processes. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or definitional renaming; the central result follows from perturbative identification of the leading correction within the model's Hamiltonian, which remains externally falsifiable against numerics without requiring the target tricritical location as input. This is the normal non-circular outcome for an application of mean-field methods.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the Landau theory is treated as a standard tool whose applicability is assumed without listed details.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5662 in / 1266 out tokens · 46106 ms · 2026-06-29T15:37:07.326183+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Folds of one curve: the superradiant phase diagram of Dicke modes with interacting matter

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Superradiant first-order transitions in Dicke models with interacting matter are folds of one equation of state from the matter's magnetization response rather than crossings of disjoint sheets.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    then yields the ground-state energy density of the short-range model on a regular lattice with coordination numberz ¯e(hx) =e 0 − h2 x 2A + |ϵ| −J 8A3B h4 x +O(h 6 x),(10) wheree 0 =−|ϵ| −zJ/2,A=|ϵ|+ 2J, andB=|ϵ|+J. The corresponding magnetization is mx =− ∂¯e ∂hx = hx A − |ϵ| −J 2A3B h3 x +O(h 5 x).(11) 4 We perform a Legendre transformation of the short...

    work page doi:10.55776/coe1

  2. [2]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with in- dividually controlled rydberg atoms, Nature Physics16, 132–142 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Chomaz, I

    L. Chomaz, I. Ferrier-Barbut, F. Ferlaino, B. Laburthe- Tolra, B. L. Lev, and T. Pfau, Dipolar physics: a review of experiments with magnetic quantum gases, Reports on Progress in Physics86, 026401 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Defenu, T

    N. Defenu, T. Donner, T. Macrì, G. Pagano, S. Ruffo, and A. Trombettoni, Long-range interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 035002 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes, and I. Bloch, Realization of the hofstadter hamiltonian with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 185301 (2013)

    2013

  7. [7]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many- body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579–584 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Lienhard, S

    V. Lienhard, S. de Léséleuc, D. Barredo, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, M. Schuler, L.-P. Henry, and A. M. Läuchli, Observing the space- and time-dependent growth of cor- relations in dynamically tuned synthetic ising models with antiferromagnetic interactions, Phys. Rev. X8, 021070 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    Scholl, M

    P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. Läuchli, and A. Browaeys, Quantum simulation of 2d antiferromagnets with hun- dreds of rydberg atoms, Nature595, 233–238 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V. S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee, M. Schuler, A. M. Läuchli, M. P. Zale- tel, T. Lahaye, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Continuous symmetry breaking in a two-dimensional rydberg array, Nature616, 691–695 (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    L. Su, A. Douglas, M. Szurek, R. Groth, S. F. Ozturk, A. Krahn, A. H. Hébert, G. A. Phelps, S. Ebadi, S. Dick- erson, F. Ferlaino, O. Marković, and M. Greiner, Dipolar quantum solids emerging in a hubbard quantum simula- tor, Nature622, 724–729 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    Michel, L

    A. Michel, L. Henriet, C. Domain, A. Browaeys, and T. Ayral, Hubbard physics with rydberg atoms: Using a quantum spin simulator to simulate strong fermionic correlations, Phys. Rev. B109, 174409 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    One-to-one quantum simulation of a frustrated magnet with 256 qubits

    L. Leclerc, S. Julià-Farré, G. S. Freitas, G. Villaret, B. Albrecht, L. Béguin, L. Bourachot, C. Briosne- Frejaville, D. Claveau, A. Cornillot, J. de Hond, D. Di- allo, C. Dupays, R. Dupont, T. Eritzpokhoff, E. Got- tlob, L. Henriet, M. Kaicher, L. Lassablière, A. Lind- berg, Y. Machu, H. Mamann, T. Pansiot, J. Ripoll, E. S. Choi, A. Signoles, J. Vovrosh,...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    Hepp and E

    K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb, On the superradiant phase tran- sition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: the dicke maser model, Annals of Physics76, 360 (1973)

    1973

  15. [15]

    Hepp and E

    K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb, Equilibrium statistical mechan- ics of matter interacting with the quantized radiation field, Phys. Rev. A8, 2517 (1973). 7

    1973

  16. [16]

    A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dissi- pative two-state system, Reviews of Modern Physics59, 1–85 (1987)

    1987

  17. [17]

    Dimer, B

    F. Dimer, B. Estienne, A. S. Parkins, and H. J. Carmichael, Proposed realization of the dicke-model quantum phase transition in an optical cavity qed sys- tem, Phys. Rev. A75, 013804 (2007)

    2007

  18. [18]

    Baumann, C

    K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity, Nature464, 1301–1306 (2010)

    2010

  19. [19]

    F. Haas, J. Volz, R. Gehr, J. Reichel, and J. Estève, Entangled states of more than 40 atoms in an optical fiber cavity, Science344, 180–183 (2014)

    2014

  20. [20]

    Klinder, H

    J. Klinder, H. Keßler, M. R. Bakhtiari, M. Thorwart, and A. Hemmerich, Observation of a superradiant mott insulator in the dicke-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 230403 (2015)

    2015

  21. [21]

    Landig, L

    R. Landig, L. Hruby, N. Dogra, M. Landini, R. Mottl, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Quantum phases from com- peting short- and long-range interactions in an optical lattice, Nature532, 476–479 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    Zhiqiang, C

    Z. Zhiqiang, C. H. Lee, R. Kumar, K. J. Arnold, S. J. Masson, A. S. Parkins, and M. D. Barrett, Nonequilib- rium phase transition in a spin-1 dicke model, Optica4, 424 (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    Zhang, C

    Z. Zhang, C. H. Lee, R. Kumar, K. J. Arnold, S. J. Mas- son, A. L. Grimsmo, A. S. Parkins, and M. D. Barrett, Dicke-model simulation via cavity-assisted raman transi- tions, Phys. Rev. A97, 043858 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    C. F. Lee and N. F. Johnson, First-order superradiant phase transitions in a multiqubit cavity system, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 083001 (2004)

    2004

  25. [26]

    Zhang, Q

    X.-F. Zhang, Q. Sun, Y.-C. Wen, W.-M. Liu, S. Eggert, and A.-C. Ji, Rydberg polaritons in a cavity: A superra- diant solid, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 090402 (2013)

    2013

  26. [27]

    Zhang, L

    Y. Zhang, L. Yu, J. Q. Liang, G. Chen, S. Jia, and F. Nori, Quantum phases in circuit qed with a supercon- ducting qubit array, Scientific Reports4, 4083 (2014)

    2014

  27. [28]

    Gelhausen, M

    J. Gelhausen, M. Buchhold, A. Rosch, and P. Strack, Quantum-optical magnets with competing short- and long-range interactions: Rydberg-dressed spin lattice in an optical cavity, SciPost Phys.1, 004 (2016)

    2016

  28. [29]

    Schuler, D

    M. Schuler, D. D. Bernardis, A. M. Läuchli, and P. Rabl, The vacua of dipolar cavity quantum electrodynamics, SciPost Phys.9, 066 (2020)

    2020

  29. [30]

    J. Rohn, M. Hörmann, C. Genes, and K. P. Schmidt, Ising model in a light-induced quantized transverse field, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023131 (2020)

    2020

  30. [31]

    Schellenberger and K

    A. Schellenberger and K. P. Schmidt, (Almost) every- thing is a Dicke model - Mapping non-superradiant cor- related light-matter systems to the exactly solvable Dicke model, SciPost Phys. Core7, 038 (2024)

    2024

  31. [32]

    K. Lenk, J. Li, P. Werner, and M. Eckstein, Collective theory for an interacting solid in a single-mode cavity (2022), arXiv:2205.05559 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [33]

    T. O. Puel and T. Macrì, Confined meson excitations in rydberg-atom arrays coupled to a cavity field, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106901 (2024)

    2024

  33. [34]

    Román-Roche, Á

    J. Román-Roche, Á. Gómez-León, F. Luis, and D. Zueco, Bound polariton states in the dicke-ising model, Nanophotonics14, 2053 (2025)

    2053

  34. [35]

    Román-Roche, Á

    J. Román-Roche, Á. Gómez-León, F. Luis, and D. Zueco, Linear response theory for cavity qed materials at arbi- trary light-matter coupling strengths, Physical Review B 111, 10.1103/physrevb.111.035156 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.035156 2025

  35. [36]

    J. A. Koziol, A. Langheld, and K. P. Schmidt, Melting of devil’s staircases in the long-range dicke-ising model, Phys. Rev. B111, 224427 (2025)

    2025

  36. [37]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    1954

  37. [38]

    Y. K. Wang and F. T. Hioe, Phase transition in the dicke model of superradiance, Phys. Rev. A7, 831 (1973)

    1973

  38. [39]

    Vidal and S

    J. Vidal and S. Dusuel, Finite-size scaling exponents in the dicke model, Europhysics Letters (EPL)74, 817–822 (2006)

    2006

  39. [40]

    Larson and E

    J. Larson and E. K. Irish, Some remarks on ‘superradi- ant’ phase transitions in light-matter systems, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50, 174002 (2017)

    2017

  40. [41]

    Langheld, M

    A. Langheld, M. Hörmann, and K. P. Schmidt, Quan- tum phase diagrams of dicke-ising models by a wormhole algorithm, Phys. Rev. B112, L161123 (2025)

    2025

  41. [42]

    N. S. Bassler, Absence of entanglement growth in dicke superradiance, Phys. Rev. A112, 053713 (2025)

    2025

  42. [43]

    Rosario, L

    P. Rosario, L. O. R. Solak, A. Cidrim, R. Bachelard, and J. Schachenmayer, Unraveling dicke superradiant decay withseparablecoherentspinstates,Phys.Rev.Lett.135, 133602 (2025)

    2025

  43. [44]

    X. H. H. Zhang, D. Malz, and P. Rabl, Unraveling su- perradiance: Entanglement and mutual information in collective decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 033602 (2025)

    2025

  44. [45]

    J. a. P. Mendonça, K. Jachymski, and Y. Wang, Role of matter interactions in superradiant phenomena, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 133601 (2025)

    2025

  45. [46]

    L. F. dos Prazeres, H. Hosseinabadi, and J. Marino, Kinetically constrained superradiance (2026), arXiv:2605.05343 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [47]

    Extensive mixed-state entanglement in kinetically constrained superradiance

    L. Winter, J. Kumlin, T. Pohl, and A. Nunnenkamp, Extensive mixed-state entanglement in kinetically con- strained superradiance (2026), arXiv:2605.16131 [quant- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [48]

    Leibig, M

    J. Leibig, M. Hörmann, A. Langheld, A. Schellenberger, and K. P. Schmidt, Quantitative approach for the dicke- ising chain with an effective self-consistent matter hamil- tonian (2026), arXiv:2601.10210 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  48. [49]

    Binder, Critical properties and finite-size effects of the five-dimensional ising model, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter61, 13–23 (1985)

    K. Binder, Critical properties and finite-size effects of the five-dimensional ising model, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter61, 13–23 (1985)

    1985

  49. [50]

    Binder, M

    K. Binder, M. Nauenberg, V. Privman, and A. P. Young, Finite-size tests of hyperscaling, Physical Review B31, 1498–1502 (1985)

    1985

  50. [51]

    Luijten and H

    E. Luijten and H. W. J. Blöte, Classical critical behav- ior of spin models with long-range interactions, Physical Review B56, 8945–8958 (1997)

    1997

  51. [52]

    Kenna and B

    R. Kenna and B. Berche, A new critical exponent koppa and its logarithmic counterpart koppa-hat, Condensed Matter Physics16, 23601 (2013)

    2013

  52. [53]

    E. J. Flores-Sola, B. Berche, R. Kenna, and M. Weigel, Finite-size scaling above the upper critical dimension in ising models with long-range interactions, The Euro- peanPhysicalJournalB88,10.1140/epjb/e2014-50683-1 (2015). 8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2014-50683-1 2015

  53. [54]

    Flores-Sola, B

    E. Flores-Sola, B. Berche, R. Kenna, and M. Weigel, Role of fourier modes in finite-size scaling above the upper critical dimension, Physical Review Letters116, 10.1103/physrevlett.116.115701 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.115701 2016

  54. [55]

    J. A. Koziol, A. Langheld, S. C. Kapfer, and K. P. Schmidt, Quantum-critical properties of the long-range transverse-field ising model from quantum monte carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. B103, 245135 (2021)

    2021

  55. [56]

    Berche, T

    B. Berche, T. Ellis, Y. Holovatch, and R. Kenna, Phase transitions above the upper critical dimension, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 60 (2022)

    2022

  56. [57]

    Langheld, J

    A. Langheld, J. A. Koziol, P. Adelhardt, S. C. Kapfer, and K. P. Schmidt, Scaling at quantum phase transitions above the upper critical dimension, SciPost Phys.13, 088 (2022)

    2022

  57. [58]

    Adelhardt, J

    P. Adelhardt, J. A. Koziol, A. Langheld, and K. P. Schmidt, Monte carlo based techniques for quantum magnets with long-range interactions, Entropy26, 10.3390/e26050401 (2024)

    work page doi:10.3390/e26050401 2024

  58. [59]

    M. E. Fisher, Scaling, universality and renormalization group theory, inCritical Phenomena, edited by F. J. W. Hahne (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,

  59. [60]

    M. Suzuki, Relationship between d-dimensional quan- tal spin systems and (d+1)-dimensional ising systems: Equivalence, critical exponents and systematic approx- imants of the partition function and spin correlations, Progress of Theoretical Physics56, 1454–1469 (1976)

    1976

  60. [61]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions(Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions(Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  61. [62]

    J. Zhao, M. Song, Y. Qi, J. Rong, and Z. Y. Meng, Finite-temperature critical behaviors in 2d long-range quantum heisenberg model, npj Quantum Materials8, 10.1038/s41535-023-00591-6 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-023-00591-6 2023

  62. [63]

    Adelhardt and K

    P. Adelhardt and K. P. Schmidt, Continuously varying critical exponents in long-range quantum spin ladders, SciPost Phys.15, 087 (2023)

    2023

  63. [64]

    M. Song, J. Zhao, Y. Qi, J. Rong, and Z. Y. Meng, Quan- tum criticality and entanglement for the two-dimensional long-rangeheisenbergbilayer,Phys.Rev.B109,L081114 (2024)

    2024

  64. [65]

    Adelhardt, A

    P. Adelhardt, A. Duft, and K. P. Schmidt, Quantum- critical and dynamical properties of the xxz bilayer with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. B111, 024409 (2025)

    2025

  65. [66]

    Unconventional entanglement scaling and quantum criticality in the long-range spin-one Heisenberg chain with single-ion anisotropy

    P. Adelhardt, S. R. Muleady, K. P. Schmidt, and A. V. Gorshkov, Unconventional entanglement scaling and quantum criticality in the long-range spin-one heisenberg chainwithsingle-ionanisotropy(2026),arXiv:2604.12754 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [67]

    quantum phase diagrams of dicke-ising models by a wormhole algorithm

    A. Langheld, M. Hörmann, and K. P. Schmidt, Raw data to "quantum phase diagrams of dicke-ising models by a wormhole algorithm", 10.5281/zenodo.15774230 (2025)

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.15774230 2025

  67. [68]

    Gammelmark and K

    S. Gammelmark and K. Mølmer, Phase transitions and heisenberg limited metrology in an ising chain interacting with a single-mode cavity field, New Journal of Physics 13, 053035 (2011)

    2011

  68. [69]

    Solutions forϵ <0are obtained byσ z i → −σ z i

  69. [70]

    S. Sur, Y. Wang, M. Mahankali, S. Paschen, and Q. Si, Amplified response of cavity-coupled quantum-critical systems, Nature Communications17, 10.1038/s41467- 026-73112-1 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467- 2026

  70. [71]

    Z. Rao, X. Lin, X. Luo, G. Guo, H. Pu, and M. Gong, Unilateral criticality and phase transition in the cavity- ising model (2025), arXiv:2509.04391 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [72]

    Otake and M

    S. Otake and M. Bamba, Exactly solvable phase tran- sition in a cavity-coupled one-dimensional ising chain, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023150 (2026)

    2026

  72. [73]

    role of mat- ter interactions in superradiant phenomena

    M. Hörmann, A. Langheld, J. Leibig, A. Schellen- berger, and K. P. Schmidt, Comment on "role of mat- ter interactions in superradiant phenomena" (2025), arXiv:2511.08452 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [74]

    P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky, Mean-field theory, inPrinciples of Condensed Matter Physics(Cambridge University Press, 1995) p. 144–212

    1995

  74. [75]

    Reslen, L

    J. Reslen, L. Quiroga, and N. F. Johnson, Direct equiv- alence between quantum phase transition phenomena in radiation-matter and magnetic systems: Scaling of en- tanglement, Europhysics Letters (EPL)69, 8–14 (2005)

    2005

  75. [76]

    Tindemans and H

    P. Tindemans and H. Capel, On the free energy in sys- tems with separable interactions. iii, Physica A: Statisti- cal Mechanics and its Applications79, 478–502 (1975)

    1975

  76. [77]

    den Ouden, H

    L. den Ouden, H. Capel, J. Perk, and P. Tindemans, Sys- tems with separable many-particle interactions. i, Phys- ica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications85, 51–70 (1976)

    1976

  77. [78]

    den Ouden, H

    L. den Ouden, H. Capel, and J. Perk, Systems with sepa- rable many-particle interactions. ii, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications85, 425–456 (1976)

    1976

  78. [79]

    J. Perk, H. Capel, and L. den Ouden, Convex-envelope formulation for separable many-particle interactions, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications89, 555–568 (1977)

    1977

  79. [80]

    Capel, L

    H. Capel, L. Den Ouden, and J. Perk, Stability of critical behaviour, critical-exponent renormalization and first- order transitions, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications95, 371–416 (1979)

    1979

  80. [81]

    Here an analytical solution is available [85, 86]

    The notable exception is the model withϵ= 0on the chain. Here an analytical solution is available [85, 86]

Showing first 80 references.