pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27513 · v1 · pith:TJYQZBBNnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · ✦ hep-ph

Constraints on a Light Leptophilic Scalar from Dark-Sector Couplings

Marco Graziani , Giacomo Landini , Federico Mescia , Claudio Toni , Ludovico Vittorio This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 16:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords dark matterleptophilic scalarrelic abundancefreeze-infreeze-outsub-GeV dark matterelectron recoilmediator constraints
0
0 comments X

The pith

A light electron-coupled scalar mediator permits only a narrow parameter space for sub-GeV Majorana dark matter to match the relic density.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates a minimal model in which a Majorana fermion serves as dark matter and interacts through a light scalar that couples primarily to electrons. Production of the correct relic density is studied via both freeze-out and freeze-in processes. Various constraints from cosmology, astrophysics, and laboratory experiments including electron-recoil searches and precision measurements are applied to map the allowed regions. The analysis concludes that a limited set of parameters survives, with a strong preference for dark matter masses below one GeV. This work also explores the mediator mass near 17 MeV motivated by experimental hints and incorporates possible quark couplings.

Core claim

We study a minimal framework where a Majorana fermion dark matter particle interacts with a light scalar mediator coupled mainly to electrons. We examine both freeze-out and freeze-in production to determine the regions of parameter space that yield the correct relic abundance with particular emphasis on a detailed comparison with results in the recent literature. The analysis includes cosmological and astrophysical constraints as well as laboratory bounds from electron-recoil experiments, fixed target searches, and precision measurements. The combined results identify a narrow but viable parameter region, favoring sub-GeV dark matter, and define clear targets for future experimental tests.

What carries the argument

The light leptophilic scalar mediator that transmits interactions between the Majorana dark matter fermion and electrons, with possible light-quark couplings near 17 MeV.

If this is right

  • Only sub-GeV dark matter masses remain viable after all constraints are applied.
  • The analysis defines specific targets for future direct-detection and collider experiments.
  • Direct searches already exclude large portions of parameter space even when dark matter is produced via freeze-in.
  • Strong complementarity exists between direct-detection experiments and collider searches for testing the model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 17 MeV mediator signal holds, it would require fine-tuning of quark couplings inside the surviving window.
  • Low-threshold detectors now under development could close or confirm the narrow remaining space.
  • Analogous light-mediator setups with different fermion couplings might produce similarly restricted viable regions for light dark matter.

Load-bearing premise

The scalar mediator is assumed to couple mainly to electrons in a minimal setup, with relic abundance determined solely by standard freeze-out or freeze-in without additional effects.

What would settle it

Observation of dark matter with mass above 1 GeV in electron-recoil data within the model's predicted coupling range, or complete exclusion of the remaining window by upcoming direct-detection runs, would falsify the viable region.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27513 by Claudio Toni, Federico Mescia, Giacomo Landini, Ludovico Vittorio, Marco Graziani.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Parameter space in the plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The solid blue lines are the results of the matching of our DM abundance computations in the non-resonant regime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The solid red line is the result of our computation of the SI DM-nucleon elastic cross section as in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study a minimal framework where a Majorana fermion dark matter particle interacts with a light scalar mediator coupled mainly to electrons. We examine both freeze-out and freeze-in production to determine the regions of parameter space that yield the correct relic abundance with particular emphasis on a detailed comparison with results in the recent literature. The analysis includes cosmological and astrophysical constraints as well as laboratory bounds from electron-recoil experiments, fixed target searches, and precision measurements. The combined results identify a narrow but viable parameter region, favoring sub-GeV dark matter, and define clear targets for future experimental tests. This highlights the strong complementarity between direct-detection experiments and collider searches. We additionally investigate the mediator-mass region around 17 MeV, motivated by the hints reported by the ATOMKI experiment and the PADME collaboration, including couplings between the mediator and light quarks. Direct searches already constrain a large region of the parameter space, even when dark matter is produced via freeze-in, pointing again to sub-GeV dark matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies a minimal model with Majorana fermion dark matter interacting via a light scalar mediator coupled primarily to electrons. It computes relic abundance via freeze-out and freeze-in, applies cosmological, astrophysical, and laboratory bounds (electron-recoil, fixed-target, precision measurements), identifies a narrow viable sub-GeV DM region, and extends the analysis to the ~17 MeV mediator motivated by ATOMKI/PADME hints with added quark couplings. The work stresses complementarity between direct detection and collider searches.

Significance. If the derivations and constraint implementations hold, the manuscript supplies a timely, consolidated update on leptophilic scalar mediators in DM models. The explicit comparison to recent literature, dual production mechanisms, and targeted 17 MeV extension provide concrete targets for upcoming experiments and illustrate the interplay between lab and cosmological probes.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'detailed comparison with results in the recent literature' is not accompanied by citations; the introduction should list the specific prior works being compared.
  2. [Abstract] The manuscript states that freeze-in and freeze-out are examined but does not indicate in the abstract or early sections whether the viable region is dominated by one mechanism or both; a brief statement would improve clarity.
  3. [Abstract] The 17 MeV extension includes quark couplings, yet the abstract does not specify the size of the quark coupling relative to the electron coupling or whether it is fixed by a particular ansatz; this should be stated explicitly when the extension is introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the recognition of its timeliness, and the recommendation for minor revision. The summary accurately captures the scope of our analysis on the leptophilic scalar mediator with Majorana dark matter, including freeze-out/freeze-in production, constraints, and the 17 MeV extension. No specific major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper describes a standard minimal model analysis for a leptophilic scalar mediator coupled to electrons and Majorana DM, computing relic density via freeze-out or freeze-in and overlaying external cosmological, astrophysical, and laboratory bounds. No derivation step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or self-defined quantity, and the abstract and description contain no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks and literature comparisons.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

Based on abstract description; full details on parameters and assumptions not available.

free parameters (3)
  • DM mass
    Scanned to find viable regions consistent with relic abundance
  • mediator mass
    Particularly examined around 17 MeV due to experimental hints
  • electron coupling strength
    Determines interaction rate and relic density
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The scalar mediator couples mainly to electrons (leptophilic)
    Core assumption of the minimal framework studied
  • domain assumption Freeze-out and freeze-in production mechanisms determine the relic abundance
    Used to identify regions yielding correct relic density
invented entities (2)
  • light leptophilic scalar mediator no independent evidence
    purpose: Facilitates interactions between Majorana DM and standard model particles, primarily electrons
    Postulated as part of the minimal dark sector framework
  • Majorana fermion dark matter no independent evidence
    purpose: The dark matter candidate in the model
    Assumed as the DM particle interacting via the scalar

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5708 in / 1339 out tokens · 65529 ms · 2026-06-29T16:44:12.157397+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 110 canonical work pages · 57 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    CMB and Indirect detection Dark Matter annihilationsψψ→XXare followed by the instantaneous decaysX→e+e−and are potentially constrained by CMB measurements and indirect detec- tion searches. However, due to theirp-wave nature, the corresponding cross sections are suppressed by the low DM velocity both at the time of recombination and at present time, so th...

  2. [2]

    These attracted attention due to their ability to reduce the central densities of DM halos

    Bullet Cluster and SIDM Scenarios with a DM elastic self-interaction cross sec- tion per unit mass ofO(cm 2/gr)are known in the lit- erature as Self-Interacting Dark Matter (SIDM) mod- els [65]. These attracted attention due to their ability to reduce the central densities of DM halos. Indeed, such large cross sections could alleviate some tension between...

  3. [3]

    Therecent study carriedout inRef.[80] has precisely investigated this kind of bounds and, in what follows, we will briefly review its findings

    Laboratory constraints Data from low-energy observables can give important constraints on the parameter space of the CP-even elec- trophilic scalar mediatorX, independently of its hypo- thetical role as a mediator between the visible and the darksectors. Therecent study carriedout inRef.[80] has precisely investigated this kind of bounds and, in what foll...

  4. [4]

    When the DM particle scatters off the electrons bounded in the atoms of the target material, it can ion- ize them, provided it possesses enough kinetic energy, i.e

    Direct detection–electron scatterings Direct detection (DD) experiments are sensitive to scatteringsofDMoffelectronsandprovideanupperlimit on the corresponding cross section (see for instance [88– 90])7. When the DM particle scatters off the electrons bounded in the atoms of the target material, it can ion- ize them, provided it possesses enough kinetic e...

  5. [5]

    neutrinofog

    Direct detection–nuclear scatterings Despite the fact that the electrophilic mediator does not couple at tree level with quarks and gluons, such in- teractions are induced at the loop level, thus providing loop-suppressed DM scatterings off nucleons. These are relevant for DM masses above the GeV, where the experi- mentallimitsfromnuclearrecoilsareorderso...

    2022

  6. [6]

    neutrino fog

    This article is based upon work from COST Action COSMIC WISPers CA21106, supported by COST (Eu- ropean Cooperation in Science and Technology). The work of CT has received funding from the French ANR, under contracts ANR-19-CE31-0016 (‘GammaRare’) and ANR-23-CE31-0018 (‘InvISYble’), that he gratefully ac- knowledges. The work of LV is supported by the Ital...

    2024

  7. [7]

    C.-Y. Chen, J. Kozaczuk, and Y.-M. Zhong, JHEP10, 154 (2018), arXiv:1807.03790 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    J. Kopp, V. Niro, T. Schwetz, and J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D80, 083502 (2009), arXiv:0907.3159 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  9. [9]

    Horigome, T

    S.-I. Horigome, T. Katayose, S. Matsumoto, and I. Saha, Phys. Rev. D104, 055001 (2021), arXiv:2102.08645 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Jia, Eur

    L.-B. Jia, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 321 (2022), arXiv:2105.13805 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Leptophilic Dark Matter in Lepton Interactions at LEP and ILC

    A. Freitas and S. Westhoff, JHEP10, 116 (2014), arXiv:1408.1959 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Electrophilic dark matter with dark photon: from DAMPE to direct detection

    P.-H. Gu and X.-G. He, Phys. Lett. B778, 292 (2018), arXiv:1711.11000 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    K. Asai, C. Miyao, S. Okawa, and K. Tsumura, Phys. Rev. D106, 035017 (2022), arXiv:2205.08998 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Rella, B

    C. Rella, B. Döbrich, and T.-T. Yu, Phys. Rev. D106, 035023 (2022), arXiv:2205.09870 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    J. P. Leeset al.(BaBar), Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 181801 (2020), arXiv:2005.01885 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Zhu and X

    B. Zhu and X. Liu, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.65, 231011 (2022), arXiv:2104.03238 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Exploring muonphilic dark matter with theZ2-even mediator at muon colliders,

    W. Chen, H. Li, C.-T. Lu, and Q. Wang, “Exploring muonphilic dark matter with theZ2-even mediator at muon colliders,” (2025), arXiv:2511.21290 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    P. J. Fox and E. Poppitz, Phys. Rev. D79, 083528 (2009), arXiv:0811.0399 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    Q.-H. Cao, E. Ma, and G. Shaughnessy, Phys. Lett. B 673, 152 (2009), arXiv:0901.1334 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  20. [20]

    Cosmic Rays from Leptophilic Dark Matter Decay via Kinetic Mixing

    A. Ibarra, A. Ringwald, D. Tran, and C. Weniger, JCAP08, 017 (2009), arXiv:0903.3625 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  21. [21]

    Lepton Portal Dark Matter

    Y. Bai and J. Berger, JHEP08, 153 (2014), arXiv:1402.6696 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    Okawa and Y

    S. Okawa and Y. Omura, JHEP02, 231 (2021), arXiv:2011.04788 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    S. N. Gninenko, N. V. Krasnikov, and V. A. Matveev, Phys. Rev. D91, 095015 (2015), arXiv:1412.1400 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  24. [24]

    Yaser Ayazi and A

    S. Yaser Ayazi and A. Mohamadnejad, J. Phys. G47, 095003 (2020), arXiv:1909.10729 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Armando, P

    G. Armando, P. Panci, J. Weiss, and R. Ziegler, Phys. Rev. D109, 055029 (2024), arXiv:2310.05827 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Model-independent analysis of the DAMPE excess

    P. Athron, C. Balazs, A. Fowlie, and Y. Zhang, JHEP 02, 121 (2018), arXiv:1711.11376 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    T.-P. Tang, M. Yang, K.-K. Duan, Y.-L. S. Tsai, and Y.-Z.Fan,JCAP11,013(2025),arXiv:2505.05359[hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Abdughani, Y.-Z

    M. Abdughani, Y.-Z. Fan, C.-T. Lu, T.-P. Tang, and Y.-L. S. Tsai, JHEP07, 127 (2022), arXiv:2111.02946 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    J.KoechlerandM.DiMauro,Phys.Rev.D112,115016 (2025), arXiv:2508.02775 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Cesarotti and G

    C. Cesarotti and G. Krnjaic, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 171802 (2025), arXiv:2404.02906 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Dubinski and R

    J. Dubinski and R. G. Carlberg, Astrophys. J.378, 496 (1991)

    1991

  32. [32]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astro- phys. J.462, 563 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9508025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  33. [33]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astro- phys. J.490, 493 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9611107

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  34. [34]

    R. Dave, D. N. Spergel, P. J. Steinhardt, and B. D. Wandelt, Astrophys. J.547, 574 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0006218

    work page arXiv 2001

  35. [35]

    Subhaloes in Self-Interacting Galactic Dark Matter Haloes

    M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala, and A. Loeb, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.423, 3740 (2012), arXiv:1201.5892 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    Cosmological Simulations with Self-Interacting Dark Matter I: Constant Density Cores and Substructure

    M. Rocha, A. H. G. Peter, J. S. Bullock, M. Kapling- hat, S. Garrison-Kimmel, J. Onorbe, and L. A. Mous- takas, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.430, 81 (2013), arXiv:1208.3025 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    A. H. G. Peter, M. Rocha, J. S. Bullock, and 16 M. Kaplinghat, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.430, 105 (2013), arXiv:1208.3026 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  38. [38]

    O. D. Elbert, J. S. Bullock, S. Garrison-Kimmel, M. Rocha, J. Oñorbe, and A. H. G. Peter, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.453, 29 (2015), arXiv:1412.1477 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [39]

    A. B. Fry, F. Governato, A. Pontzen, T. Quinn, M. Tremmel, L. Anderson, H. Menon, A. M. Brooks, and J. Wadsley, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.452, 1468 (2015), arXiv:1501.00497 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    Duttaet al., (2023), arXiv:2301.08768 [nucl-ex]

    D. Duttaet al., (2023), arXiv:2301.08768 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Celentano, M

    A. Celentano, M. Battaglieri, M. Bondì, P. Cole, M. De Napoli, R. De Vita, L. Marsicano, N. Randazzo, E. Smith, and M. Spreafico, PoSICHEP2022, 327 (2022)

    2022

  42. [42]

    Battaglieriet al., Phys

    M. Battaglieriet al., Phys. Rev. D106, 072011 (2022), arXiv:2208.01387 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Akessonet al.(LDMX), (2025), arXiv:2508.11833 [hep-ex]

    T. Akessonet al.(LDMX), (2025), arXiv:2508.11833 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    P.Albicoccoet al.(PADME),JINST17,P08032(2022), arXiv:2205.03430 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Y. M. Andreevet al.(NA64), Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 211803 (2024), arXiv:2401.01708 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Dark Sectors at fixed targets: The example of NA62

    B. Döbrich (NA62), Frascati Phys. Ser.66, 312 (2018), arXiv:1807.10170 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    Bossiet al.(PADME), JHEP11, 007 (2025), arXiv:2505.24797 [hep-ex]

    F. Bossiet al.(PADME), JHEP11, 007 (2025), arXiv:2505.24797 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    A.J.Krasznahorkayet al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.116,042501 (2016), arXiv:1504.01527

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    A. J. Krasznahorkayet al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.1056, 012028 (2018)

    2018

  50. [50]

    New evidence supporting the existence of the hypothetic X17 particle,

    A. J. Krasznahorkayet al., “New evidence supporting the existence of the hypothetic X17 particle,” (2019), arXiv:1910.10459 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    A. J. Krasznahorkayet al., Phys. Rev. C104, 044003 (2021)

    2021

  52. [52]

    A. J. Krasznahorkayet al., Phys. Rev. C106, L061601 (2022)

    2022

  53. [53]

    A. J. Krasznahorkayet al., EPJ Web Conf.232, 04005 (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    A. J. Krasznahorkayet al., EPJ Web Conf.232, 04005 (2024), update of previous results

    2024

  55. [55]

    A. D. Medina, N. I. Mileo, A. Szynkman, and S. A. Tanco, Phys. Rev. D106, 075018 (2022), arXiv:2112.09103 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update

    R. Alibertiet al., Phys. Rept.1143, 1 (2025), arXiv:2505.21476 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Searches for invisible higgs bosons: Preliminary combined results using lep data up to 209 gev,

    ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL Collaborations and the LEP Higgs Working Group, “Searches for invisible higgs bosons: Preliminary combined results using lep data up to 209 gev,” LEP LHWG Note 2001-06 (hep- ex/0107032) (2001)

    work page arXiv 2001

  59. [59]

    Decay-mode independent searches for neutral scalar bosons at lep,

    A. Quadt and the LEP Collaborations, “Decay-mode independent searches for neutral scalar bosons at lep,” CERN-EP/2002-XXX (CERN Document Server) (2002), overview of ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, and OPAL scalar searches

    2002

  60. [60]

    Biswaset al.(Belle), Phys

    D. Biswaset al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. D109, 032002 (2024), arXiv:2207.07476 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    J. D. Bjorken, S. Ecklund, W. R. Nelson, A. Abashian, C. Church, B. Lu, L. W. Mo, T. A. Nunamaker, and P. Rassmann, Phys. Rev. D38, 3375 (1988)

    1988

  62. [62]

    Davier and H

    M. Davier and H. Nguyen Ngoc, Phys. Lett. B229, 150 (1989)

    1989

  63. [63]

    Cogollo, Y

    D. Cogollo, Y. M. Oviedo-Torres, F. S. Queiroz, Y. Vil- lamizar, and J. Zamora-Saa, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1404 (2025), arXiv:2412.19893 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Cosmological Implications of Dark Matter Bound States

    A. Mitridate, M. Redi, J. Smirnov, and A. Strumia, JCAP05, 006 (2017), arXiv:1702.01141 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  65. [65]

    Beyond Collisionless Dark Matter: Particle Physics Dynamics for Dark Matter Halo Structure

    S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D87, 115007 (2013), arXiv:1302.3898 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  66. [66]

    M. B. Wise and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D90, 055030 (2014), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 039907 (2015)], arXiv:1407.4121 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Dark-matter bound states from Feynman diagrams

    K. Petraki, M. Postma, and M. Wiechers, JHEP06, 128 (2015), arXiv:1505.00109 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Radiative bound-state-formation cross-sections for dark matter interacting via a Yukawa potential

    K. Petraki, M. Postma, and J. de Vries, JHEP04, 077 (2017), arXiv:1611.01394 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    Dark matter bound states via emission of scalar mediators

    R. Oncala and K. Petraki, JHEP01, 070 (2019), arXiv:1808.04854 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    H. An, M. B. Wise, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B773, 121 (2017), arXiv:1606.02305 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    D. N. Spergel and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3760 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9909386

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  72. [72]

    The non-gravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters

    D. Harvey, R. Massey, T. Kitching, A. Taylor, and E. Tittley, Science347, 1462 (2015), arXiv:1503.07675 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    Constraining self-interacting dark matter with scaling laws of observed halo surface densities

    K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, T. Bringmann, and A. Sokolenko, JCAP04, 049 (2018), arXiv:1712.06602 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    Harvey, A

    D. Harvey, A. Robertson, R. Massey, and I. G. Mc- Carthy, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.488, 1572 (2019), arXiv:1812.06981 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    Sagunski, S

    L. Sagunski, S. Gad-Nasr, B. Colquhoun, A. Robertson, and S. Tulin, JCAP01, 024 (2021), arXiv:2006.12515 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    Crosset al.(DES), Mon

    D. Crosset al.(DES), Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.529, 52 (2024), arXiv:2304.10128 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    Resonant Dark Forces and Small Scale Structure

    S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 111301 (2013), arXiv:1210.0900 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  78. [78]

    Cores in Dwarf Galaxies from Dark Matter with a Yukawa Potential

    A. Loeb and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 171302 (2011), arXiv:1011.6374 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  79. [79]

    Self-Scattering for Dark Matter with an Excited State

    K. Schutz and T. R. Slatyer, JCAP01, 021 (2015), arXiv:1409.2867 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  80. [80]

    J. L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 151301 (2010), arXiv:0911.0422 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

Showing first 80 references.