pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27520 · v1 · pith:43MI3MHTnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

The Ellis and Baldwin test of the Cosmic Dipole: Exploring the impact of multiple flux density cuts

Vasudev Mittal , Geraint F. Lewis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 15:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmic dipolematter dipoleluminosity functionflux density binsBayes factorCosmological Principleradio surveys
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dividing catalogs into flux bins and fitting the dipole simultaneously improves the statistical description for non-power-law luminosity functions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a method to measure the matter dipole by splitting an all-sky catalog into multiple disjoint flux density bins and performing a joint fit for the dipole across all bins. This incorporates information from the shape of the luminosity function, which traditional single-flux-limit approaches discard. For luminosity functions that deviate from a simple power law, the joint fit produces a higher Bayes factor, indicating a better model of the observed dipole. The improvement is largest when the flux cuts are placed where the luminosity function exhibits significant changes in slope. The authors suggest this technique could be applied to large future surveys to better test the Cosmological Principle.

Core claim

By dividing the catalogue into disjoint flux bins and simultaneously fitting the matter dipole across them, the analysis achieves a higher Bayes factor and thus a better description of the matter dipole than the traditional approach, particularly when the luminosity function is not a power law.

What carries the argument

Simultaneous fitting of the dipole modulation across multiple disjoint flux bins, which uses the predicted source counts from the luminosity function in each bin to extract additional dipole information.

Load-bearing premise

The luminosity function shape is sufficiently well known or modelable within the chosen flux bins so that the simultaneous fit extracts additional dipole information rather than fitting noise or LF uncertainties.

What would settle it

Apply both the traditional single-flux-cut analysis and the multi-bin simultaneous fit to the same all-sky catalog and check whether the multi-bin version produces a higher Bayes factor for the dipole model.

read the original abstract

The cosmic dipole tension - the discrepancy between the Cosmic Microwave Background kinematic dipole and the matter dipole inferred from all-sky surveys poses a significant challenge to the Cosmological Principle, which dictates that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic at the largest scales. Traditional measurement of the matter dipole requires selecting an appropriate limiting flux and calculating the dipolar modulation using sources brighter than the flux. This approach, however, ignores the shape of the source luminosity function (LF) and deprives the analysis of this crucial information. In this study, we present a new approach to calculate the matter dipole by integrating the source flux distribution into the analysis. We achieve this by dividing the catalogue into disjoint flux bins and simultaneously fitting the matter dipole across them. For non-power-law LFs, this method gives a higher Bayes factor - and hence a better description of the matter dipole - as compared to the traditional approach. The method works best when the flux cuts are selected in regions where the LF's shape changes significantly. We discuss the feasibility of this method for upcoming cosmological surveys and show that it has the potential to yield decisive results at both radio and infrared wavelengths.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new approach to measuring the cosmic matter dipole by dividing source catalogs into disjoint flux-density bins and performing a simultaneous fit for a common dipole across all bins, thereby incorporating information from the shape of the luminosity function (LF). It claims that for non-power-law LFs this yields a higher Bayes factor than the traditional single-flux-cut method, with optimal performance when flux cuts are placed where the LF shape changes significantly, and discusses applicability to future radio and infrared surveys.

Significance. If the simultaneous multi-bin fit demonstrably extracts genuine additional dipole information without being driven by unmodeled LF variations or extra degrees of freedom, the method could strengthen tests of the cosmological principle by making fuller use of all-sky survey data; the paper correctly identifies that the approach is most useful where the LF is non-power-law and changes across the chosen bins.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and methods: the central claim that the binned method produces a higher Bayes factor for non-power-law LFs is presented without any description of the specific catalog(s), the parametric form assumed for the LF in each bin, the likelihood or prior choices, the MCMC or nested-sampling procedure, or any cross-validation against injected dipoles; this prevents assessment of whether the reported improvement is robust or an artifact of the fitting setup.
  2. [Results] Results section (Bayes-factor comparison): the skeptic concern is not addressed—the paper states the method works best where the LF changes significantly, yet provides no explicit demonstration that LF parameters are either fixed from external data or marginalized such that bin-to-bin Poisson fluctuations cannot be absorbed into the dipole amplitude; without this, the Bayes-factor advantage could arise from the additional model flexibility rather than from true dipole recovery.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the dipole amplitude and direction should be defined once at first use and used consistently; the abstract refers to 'matter dipole' without distinguishing amplitude from direction in the fit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and methods: the central claim that the binned method produces a higher Bayes factor for non-power-law LFs is presented without any description of the specific catalog(s), the parametric form assumed for the LF in each bin, the likelihood or prior choices, the MCMC or nested-sampling procedure, or any cross-validation against injected dipoles; this prevents assessment of whether the reported improvement is robust or an artifact of the fitting setup.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and methods section would benefit from more explicit descriptions of these elements to allow full assessment of robustness. We will revise the manuscript to specify the catalog(s) employed, the parametric LF form assumed within each bin, the likelihood construction and prior choices, the nested-sampling procedure used for evidence calculation, and results from cross-validation on catalogs with injected dipoles. These additions will be placed in the methods section with a brief reference added to the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section (Bayes-factor comparison): the skeptic concern is not addressed—the paper states the method works best where the LF changes significantly, yet provides no explicit demonstration that LF parameters are either fixed from external data or marginalized such that bin-to-bin Poisson fluctuations cannot be absorbed into the dipole amplitude; without this, the Bayes-factor advantage could arise from the additional model flexibility rather than from true dipole recovery.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript does not contain an explicit demonstration that LF parameters are fixed from external data or properly marginalized to prevent absorption of bin-to-bin Poisson fluctuations into the dipole amplitude. We will add such a demonstration in the revised results section, using simulations with known LFs to show that the Bayes-factor improvement persists when the LF is held fixed and is attributable to the non-power-law shape information rather than extra flexibility alone. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: Bayes factor comparison is independent of the fitted dipole parameters

full rationale

The paper presents a binned simultaneous-fit method for the matter dipole that incorporates LF shape information across flux cuts, then reports higher Bayes factors versus the traditional single-cut approach for non-power-law LFs. No equation or claim reduces the reported Bayes-factor advantage to a fitted parameter by construction, a self-citation chain, or a renamed input. The central comparison is a standard Bayesian model evidence ratio applied to two distinct likelihood constructions; the method description and result remain self-contained against external data and do not rely on load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes smuggled from prior work by the same authors.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the method implicitly assumes a known or modelable luminosity function shape and that flux bins can be chosen where that shape changes significantly.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The luminosity function shape is known or accurately modelable within chosen flux bins
    The method is stated to work best when bins are selected where LF shape changes significantly, implying this knowledge is available.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5731 in / 1102 out tokens · 33143 ms · 2026-06-29T15:15:22.242043+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · 14 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Milne,Relativity, Gravitation and World-structure, Oxford University Press (1935)

    E.A. Milne,Relativity, Gravitation and World-structure, Oxford University Press (1935)

    1935

  2. [2]

    Weinberg,Cosmology, Oxford University Press (2008)

    S. Weinberg,Cosmology, Oxford University Press (2008)

    2008

  3. [3]

    Kumar Aluri, P

    P. Kumar Aluri, P. Cea, P. Chingangbam, M.-C. Chu, R.G. Clowes, D. Hutsemékers et al.,Is the observable Universe consistent with the cosmological principle?,Classical and Quantum Gravity40(2023) 094001 [2207.05765]

    work page arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Ellis and J.E

    G.F.R. Ellis and J.E. Baldwin,On the expected anisotropy of radio source counts,MNRAS206 (1984) 377

    1984

  5. [5]

    Measurement of the angular correlation function of radio galaxies from the NRAO VLA Sky Survey

    C. Blake and J. Wall,Measurement of the angular correlation function of radio galaxies from the NRAO VLA Sky Survey,MNRAS329(2002) L37 [astro-ph/0111328]. 6https://www.skao.int/en – 19 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  6. [6]

    Secrest, S

    N.J. Secrest, S. von Hausegger, M. Rameez, R. Mohayaee, S. Sarkar and J. Colin,A Test of the Cosmological Principle with Quasars,ApJ Let.908(2021) L51 [2009.14826]

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Peebles,Anomalies in physical cosmology,Annals of Physics447(2022) 169159

    P. Peebles,Anomalies in physical cosmology,Annals of Physics447(2022) 169159

    2022

  8. [8]

    Secrest, S

    N.J. Secrest, S. von Hausegger, M. Rameez, R. Mohayaee and S. Sarkar,Forty years of the ellis–baldwin test,Nature Reviews Physics(2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Siewert, M

    T.M. Siewert, M. Schmidt-Rubart and D.J. Schwarz,Cosmic radio dipole: Estimators and frequency dependence,A&A653(2021) A9

    2021

  10. [10]

    Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont et al., Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck,A&A641(2020) A1 [1807.06205]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Detection of the velocity dipole in the radio galaxies of the NRAO VLA Sky Survey

    C. Blake and J. Wall,A velocity dipole in the distribution of radio galaxies,Nature416(2002) 150 [astro-ph/0203385]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  12. [12]

    Crawford,Detecting the cosmic dipole anisotropy in large-scale radio surveys,The Astrophysical Journal692(2009) 887–893

    F. Crawford,Detecting the cosmic dipole anisotropy in large-scale radio surveys,The Astrophysical Journal692(2009) 887–893

    2009

  13. [13]

    Singal,Large peculiar motion of the solar system from the dipole anisotropy in sky brightness due to distant radio sources,The Astrophysical Journal Letters742(2011) L23

    A.K. Singal,Large peculiar motion of the solar system from the dipole anisotropy in sky brightness due to distant radio sources,The Astrophysical Journal Letters742(2011) L23

    2011

  14. [14]

    Rubart and D.J

    M. Rubart and D.J. Schwarz,Cosmic radio dipole from NVSS and WENSS,A&A555(2013) A117

    2013

  15. [15]

    High redshift radio galaxies and divergence from the CMB dipole

    J. Colin, R. Mohayaee, M. Rameez and S. Sarkar,High-redshift radio galaxies and divergence from the CMB dipole,MNRAS471(2017) 1045 [1703.09376]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Bengaly, R

    C.A. Bengaly, R. Maartens and M.G. Santos,Probing the cosmological principle in the counts of radio galaxies at different frequencies,J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2018(2018) 031

    2018

  17. [17]

    Secrest, S

    N.J. Secrest, S. von Hausegger, M. Rameez, R. Mohayaee and S. Sarkar,A Challenge to the Standard Cosmological Model,ApJ Let.937(2022) L31 [2206.05624]

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Darling,The Universe is Brighter in the Direction of Our Motion: Galaxy Counts and Fluxes are Consistent with the CMB Dipole,ApJ Let.931(2022) L14 [2205.06880]

    J. Darling,The Universe is Brighter in the Direction of Our Motion: Galaxy Counts and Fluxes are Consistent with the CMB Dipole,ApJ Let.931(2022) L14 [2205.06880]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Dam, G.F

    L. Dam, G.F. Lewis and B.J. Brewer,Testing the cosmological principle with CatWISE quasars: a bayesian analysis of the number-count dipole,MNRAS525(2023) 231 [2212.07733]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Wagenveld, H.-R

    J.D. Wagenveld, H.-R. Klöckner and D.J. Schwarz,The cosmic radio dipole: Bayesian estimators on new and old radio surveys,A&A675(2023) A72

    2023

  21. [21]

    Mittal, O.T

    V. Mittal, O.T. Oayda and G.F. Lewis,The cosmic dipole in the Quaia sample of quasars: a Bayesian analysis,MNRAS527(2024) 8497 [2311.14938]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Oayda, V

    O.T. Oayda, V. Mittal, G.F. Lewis and T. Murphy,A Bayesian approach to the cosmic dipole in radio galaxy surveys: joint analysis of NVSS & RACS,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.531 (2024) 4545 [2406.01871]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Böhme, D.J

    L. Böhme, D.J. Schwarz, P. Tiwari, M. Pashapour-Ahmadabadi, B. Bahr-Kalus, M. Bilicki et al.,Overdispersed Radio Source Counts and Excess Radio Dipole Detection,Phys. Rev. Lett. 135(2025) 201001 [2509.16732]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    von Hausegger, N

    S. von Hausegger, N. Secrest, H. Desmond, M. Rameez, R. Mohayaee and S. Sarkar,Clustering properties of the CatWISE2020 quasar catalogue and their impact on the cosmic dipole anomaly,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.546(2026) stag201 [2510.23769]

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Secrest, S

    N. Secrest, S. von Hausegger, M. Rameez, R. Mohayaee and S. Sarkar,Colloquium: The Cosmic Dipole Anomaly,2505.23526. – 20 –

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Dalang and C

    C. Dalang and C. Bonvin,On the kinematic cosmic dipole tension,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society512(2022) 3895 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/512/3/3895/43290836/stac726.pdf]

    2022

  27. [27]

    von Hausegger,The expected kinematic matter dipole is robust against source evolution, Mon

    S. von Hausegger,The expected kinematic matter dipole is robust against source evolution, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.535(2024) L49 [2404.07929]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Oayda, V

    O.T. Oayda, V. Mittal and G.F. Lewis,Cosmic multipoles in galaxy surveys – I. How inferences depend on source counts and masks,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.537(2025) 1 [2412.12600]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Oayda and G.F

    O.T. Oayda and G.F. Lewis,Wising up to CatWISE: using simulation-based inference to interpret the ecliptic bias and confirm the cosmic dipole excess,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 546(2026) stag248 [2602.05070]

    work page arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Cosmic dipole tensions: confronting the cosmic microwave background with infrared and radio populations of cosmological sources

    M. Land-Strykowski, G.F. Lewis and T. Murphy,Cosmic dipole tensions: confronting the cosmic microwave background with infrared and radio populations of cosmological sources,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.543(2025) 3229 [2509.18689]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    The kinematic cosmic dipole beyond Ellis and Baldwin

    A. Bonnefous,The kinematic cosmic dipole beyond Ellis and Baldwin,2602.05700

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    A General Formulation of the Kinematic Dipole as a Functional of Selection and Source Properties: Beyond the Ellis--Baldwin Approximation

    T.T. Takeuchi,A General Formulation of the Kinematic Dipole as a Functional of Selection and Source Properties: Beyond the Ellis–Baldwin Approximation,2602.07389

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Blümke, K

    M. Blümke, K. Schmitz, T. Schröder, D. Agarwal and J.D. Romano,Kinematic Anisotropies in PTA Observations: Analytical Toolkit,Symmetry18(2026) 355 [2512.24055]

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Martín, C

    A. Martín, C. Skordis, D.J. Bartlett, H. Desmond, P.G. Ferreira and T. Yasin,The Cosmological Dipole in Tilted Anisotropic Universes,2512.03867

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    Yasin, R

    T. Yasin, R. Stiskalek, H. Desmond, S. von Hausegger and P.G. Ferreira,Testing cosmic anisotropy with cluster scaling relations,2602.06007

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    Millon, C

    M. Millon, C. Dalang, T. Collett and C. Bonvin,Kinematic cosmic dipole from a large sample of strong lenses,2603.11152

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Tiwari and A

    P. Tiwari and A. Nusser,Revisiting the nvss number count dipole,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2016(2016) 062

    2016

  38. [38]

    HEALPix -- a Framework for High Resolution Discretization, and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere

    K.M. Górski, E. Hivon, A.J. Banday, B.D. Wandelt, F.K. Hansen, M. Reinecke et al., HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere,ApJ622(2005) 759 [arXiv:astro-ph/0409513]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  39. [39]

    Zonca, L

    A. Zonca, L. Singer, D. Lenz, M. Reinecke, C. Rosset, E. Hivon et al.,healpy: equal area pixelization and spherical harmonics transforms for data on the sphere in python,Journal of Open Source Software4(2019) 1298

    2019

  40. [40]

    Kass and A.E

    R.E. Kass and A.E. Raftery,Bayes factors,Journal of the American Statistical Association90 (1995) 773

    1995

  41. [41]

    J. Skilling,Nested Sampling, inBayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering: 24th International Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, R. Fischer, R. Preuss and U.V. Toussaint, eds., vol. 735 ofAmerican Institute of Physics Conference Series, pp. 395–405, Nov., 2004, DOI

    2004

  42. [42]

    Skilling,Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation,Bayesian Analysis1(2006) 833

    J. Skilling,Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation,Bayesian Analysis1(2006) 833

    2006

  43. [43]

    A statistical test for Nested Sampling algorithms

    J. Buchner,A statistical test for Nested Sampling algorithms,Statistics and Computing26 (2016) 383 [1407.5459]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Buchner,Collaborative Nested Sampling: Big Data versus Complex Physical Models,PASP 131(2019) 108005 [1707.04476]

    J. Buchner,Collaborative Nested Sampling: Big Data versus Complex Physical Models,PASP 131(2019) 108005 [1707.04476]

    work page arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Buchner,UltraNest - a robust, general purpose Bayesian inference engine,The Journal of Open Source Software6(2021) 3001 [2101.09604]

    J. Buchner,UltraNest - a robust, general purpose Bayesian inference engine,The Journal of Open Source Software6(2021) 3001 [2101.09604]. – 21 –

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    The Tiered Radio Extragalactic Continuum Simulation (T-RECS)

    A. Bonaldi, M. Bonato, V. Galluzzi, I. Harrison, M. Massardi, S. Kay et al.,The Tiered Radio Extragalactic Continuum Simulation (T-RECS),Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.482(2019) 2 [1805.05222]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Bonaldi, P

    A. Bonaldi, P. Hartley, T. Ronconi, G. De Zotti and M. Bonato,The tiered radio extragalactic continuum (T-RECS) simulation II: Hi emission and continuum-Hi cross-correlation,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.524(2023) 993 [2305.10175]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Bisigello, C

    L. Bisigello, C. Gruppioni, A. Feltre, F. Calura, F. Pozzi, C. Vignali et al.,Simulating the infrared sky with a spritz,Astronomy &; Astrophysics651(2021) A52

    2021

  49. [49]

    EMU: Evolutionary Map of the Universe

    R.P. Norris, A.M. Hopkins, J. Afonso, S. Brown, J.J. Condon, L. Dunne et al.,EMU: Evolutionary Map of the Universe,PASA28(2011) 215 [1106.3219]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  50. [50]

    Hopkins, R

    A. Hopkins, R. Norris, T. Vernstrom, A. Kapinska and J. Marvil,Askap data products for project as201 (emu): images and visibilities. v1., 2022

    2022

  51. [51]

    Probing primordial non-Gaussianity with SKA galaxy redshift surveys: a fully relativistic analysis

    S. Camera, M.G. Santos and R. Maartens,Probing primordial non-Gaussianity with SKA galaxy redshift surveys: a fully relativistic analysis,MNRAS448(2015) 1035 [1409.8286]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    The Spitzer mid-infrared AGN survey. II-the demographics and cosmic evolution of the AGN population

    M. Lacy, S.E. Ridgway, A. Sajina, A.O. Petric, E.L. Gates, T. Urrutia et al.,The Spitzer mid-infrared AGN survey. II-the demographics and cosmic evolution of the AGN population, Astrophys. J.802(2015) 102 [1501.04118]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  53. [53]

    Selwood, S

    M. Selwood, S. Fotopoulou, M.N. Bremer, L. Bisigello, H. Landt, E. Bañados et al.,Euclid preparation: Lvii. observational expectations for redshift z<7 active galactic nuclei in the euclid wide and deep surveys,Astronomy &; Astrophysics693(2025) A250

    2025

  54. [54]

    JAX: composable transformations of python+numpy programs

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins and et al., “JAX: composable transformations of python+numpy programs.”https://github.com/jax-ml/jax, 2018

    2018

  55. [55]

    Harris, K.J

    C.R. Harris, K.J. Millman, S.J. van der Walt, R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau et al., Array programming with NumPy,Nature585(2020) 357

    2020

  56. [56]

    Hunter,Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment,Computing in Science & Engineering9 (2007) 90

    J.D. Hunter,Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment,Computing in Science & Engineering9 (2007) 90

    2007

  57. [57]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T.E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau et al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python,Nature Methods17 (2020) 261

    2020

  58. [58]

    10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    The Pandas Development Team,pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, Feb., 2020. 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3509134 2020

  59. [59]

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package

    Astropy Collaboration, A.M. Price-Whelan, P.L. Lim, N. Earl, N. Starkman, L. Bradley et al., The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package,apj935(2022) 167 [2206.14220]. – 22 – A Posterior distributions for the joint analyses 250 275 300 40 60 b (in degrees) Scu...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022