pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28564 · v1 · pith:OTZPZXS5new · submitted 2026-05-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Electron-beam induced methane decomposition for in-situ carbon doping of hexagonal boron nitride

Barbara Maria Mayer , Manuel L\"angle , Umair Javed , Toma Susi , E. Harriet {\AA}hlgren , Jani Kotakoski This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 11:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords carbon dopinghexagonal boron nitrideelectron beam irradiationmethane decompositionin-situ dopingEELS mappingdefect engineeringpore formation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electron beam in methane atmosphere dopes hBN with carbon atoms at nanoscale.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a method that uses an electron beam in low-pressure methane to simultaneously create vacancies in hexagonal boron nitride and decompose the methane into carbon and hydrogen atoms. This leads to progressive incorporation of carbon into the lattice, with most carbon-rich regions staying inside the irradiated area and forming small hexagonal patches. A sympathetic reader would care because prior techniques for adding carbon to hBN lacked both spatial precision and direct control over the carbon supply. The work also shows that raising methane pressure changes pore formation from irregular to triangular boron-terminated shapes through hydrogen etching of nitrogen. Time-resolved EELS mapping tracks the boron and nitrogen depletion alongside the carbon uptake.

Core claim

Electron-beam irradiation in a low-pressure methane atmosphere simultaneously generates vacancies in hBN and decomposes methane into individual carbon and hydrogen atoms, producing progressive carbon incorporation into the lattice with 84±7% of carbon-rich regions confined to the exposed area, some diffusion averaging 4.7±0.5 nm beyond it, and incorporated atoms forming hexagonal patterns in patches no larger than ~1 nm.

What carries the argument

Simultaneous vacancy creation in hBN and methane decomposition by the electron beam, tracked via annular dark-field STEM and time-resolved EELS mapping.

If this is right

  • Higher methane partial pressure suppresses irregular pore growth and favors triangular boron-terminated pores via preferential nitrogen etching.
  • Carbon atoms arrange in a hexagonal pattern inside the hBN lattice, forming patches limited to roughly 1 nm.
  • Local electronic environment around the incorporated carbon changes, as seen in EELS fine structure, with expected effects on optical properties of the defects.
  • Most carbon clustering stays within the beam spot while a minority of atoms diffuse a short distance outside it.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be used to place carbon-related defects at chosen locations for engineered optical or quantum responses.
  • Adjusting beam dose and methane pressure separately might allow independent tuning of vacancy density versus carbon supply.
  • The observed 4.7 nm diffusion distance sets a practical limit on how isolated the doped patches can be made.

Load-bearing premise

The detected carbon signal arises mainly from beam-induced breakdown of the supplied methane rather than residual chamber contamination or migration from other sources.

What would settle it

Repeating the irradiation under identical conditions but with no methane gas present and finding no measurable carbon incorporation into the hBN lattice.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28564 by Barbara Maria Mayer, E. Harriet {\AA}hlgren, Jani Kotakoski, Manuel L\"angle, Toma Susi, Umair Javed.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Pore growth in an CH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. MAADF images acquired at a hydrogen partial pressure of 1.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Temporal evolution of carbon incorporation and concurrent boron and nitrogen depletion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Atomic structure and EELS fine structure of carbon patches formed in hBN. (a) High [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Controlling the spatial incorporation of carbon into hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) is essential for engineering optically active defects, yet existing approaches lack nanoscale precision and control over the carbon supply. Here, we demonstrate a method for carbon doping of hBN using electron-beam irradiation in a low-pressure methane atmosphere, where the beam simultaneously generates vacancies and decomposes methane into individual carbon and hydrogen atoms. Using annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy, we show that increasing the methane partial pressure suppresses pore growth and drives the formation of triangular boron-terminated pores through preferential hydrogen etching of nitrogen. Time-resolved electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) mapping reveals progressive carbon incorporation into the lattice, accompanied by boron and nitrogen depletion. Carbon clustering occurs predominantly within the irradiated area: 84+-7% of carbon-rich regions are confined to the area exposed to the electron beam, while some carbon atoms are also found to diffuse up to an average distance of 4.7+-0.5 nm beyond it. The incorporated carbon atoms arrange in a hexagonal pattern within the lattice, forming patches that do not exceed ~1 nm in size. Analysis of the EELS fine structure indicates modifications to the local electronic environment within these regions, with implications for the optical properties of the resulting carbon-related defects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to demonstrate a method for nanoscale carbon doping of hBN via electron-beam irradiation in low-pressure methane, where the beam simultaneously creates vacancies and decomposes CH4. Using ADF-STEM and time-resolved EELS, it reports 84±7% spatial confinement of carbon-rich regions to the irradiated area, average carbon diffusion of 4.7±0.5 nm beyond the beam, formation of ~1 nm hexagonal carbon patches, triangular boron-terminated pores due to H etching, and modifications to local electronic structure.

Significance. If the attribution of carbon incorporation specifically to beam-induced methane decomposition is substantiated, the approach would provide a valuable in-situ technique for controlled doping of hBN with potential applications in engineering optically active defects. The reported confinement statistics and EELS observations of clustering are potentially useful, but the absence of controls for the carbon source limits the current strength of the central claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The progressive carbon incorporation and clustering are attributed to beam-induced methane decomposition, yet no control datasets (e.g., irradiation in vacuum, inert gas, or without methane) or background EELS spectra are reported to exclude residual chamber contamination, surface adsorbates, or pre-existing carbon sources as the origin of the observed EELS carbon signal.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The quantitative values 84±7% confinement and 4.7±0.5 nm diffusion are presented without accompanying details on the statistical methods, baseline subtraction, region-of-interest definition, or error propagation used to derive them from the time-resolved EELS maps and ADF-STEM images.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that incorporated carbon atoms 'arrange in a hexagonal pattern' and form patches 'that do not exceed ~1 nm in size,' but additional clarification on the criteria used to identify these patches and the EELS fine-structure analysis would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review. We address the major comments point-by-point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The progressive carbon incorporation and clustering are attributed to beam-induced methane decomposition, yet no control datasets (e.g., irradiation in vacuum, inert gas, or without methane) or background EELS spectra are reported to exclude residual chamber contamination, surface adsorbates, or pre-existing carbon sources as the origin of the observed EELS carbon signal.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of explicit control datasets limits the strength of the central claim as presented. Our current evidence rests on the time-resolved increase in carbon signal exclusively during irradiation in the methane atmosphere, the high spatial confinement to the beam area, and the formation of boron-terminated pores consistent with H etching from decomposed methane. To address this, the revised manuscript will include new control experiments (vacuum irradiation) and background EELS spectra from non-irradiated regions to rule out contamination. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The quantitative values 84±7% confinement and 4.7±0.5 nm diffusion are presented without accompanying details on the statistical methods, baseline subtraction, region-of-interest definition, or error propagation used to derive them from the time-resolved EELS maps and ADF-STEM images.

    Authors: The referee is correct that these details were omitted. The confinement percentage was derived by applying intensity thresholds to EELS carbon maps (baseline from pre-irradiation spectra) to identify carbon-rich regions and computing the fraction inside the irradiated area across N=5 independent maps; the diffusion length is the mean distance of outlier carbon pixels beyond the beam edge, with ± values as standard error of the mean. The revised manuscript will add a dedicated methods subsection (and supplementary figures) fully describing ROI selection, baseline procedures, and error propagation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental observations with no derivations or models

full rationale

The manuscript reports experimental results from STEM imaging and time-resolved EELS mapping in a methane atmosphere. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions are present that could reduce to inputs by construction. Reported values (e.g., 84±7% spatial confinement, 4.7±0.5 nm diffusion distance, ~1 nm patch size) are direct measurements from the acquired data, not outputs of any model. No self-citation chains or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing steps. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks as an experimental demonstration.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental demonstration paper; no mathematical model or derivation is present. Relies on standard interpretation of EELS fine structure for elemental mapping and bonding changes.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Electron energy-loss spectroscopy fine structure reliably indicates carbon incorporation and local electronic environment changes in the hBN lattice
    Invoked when linking EELS data to carbon clustering and modified electronic properties.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5779 in / 1440 out tokens · 48245 ms · 2026-06-29T11:02:06.707358+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Akbari, S

    H. Akbari, S. Biswas, P. K. Jha, J. Wong, B. Vest, and H. A. Atwater, Lifetime-Limited and Tunable Quantum Light Emission in h-BN via Electric Field Modulation, Nano Letters22, 7798 (2022). 15

    2022

  2. [2]

    Dietrich, M

    A. Dietrich, M. W. Doherty, I. Aharonovich, and A. Kubanek, Solid-state single photon source with Fourier transform limited lines at room temperature, Physical Review B101, 081401 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    S. X. Li, T. Ichihara, H. Park, G. He, D. Kozawa, Y. Wen, V. B. Koman, Y. Zeng, M. Kuehne, Z. Yuan, S. Faucher, J. H. Warner, and M. S. Strano, Prolonged photostability in hexagonal boron nitride quantum emitters, Communications Materials 2023 4:14, 19 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    Grosso, H

    G. Grosso, H. Moon, B. Lienhard, S. Ali, D. K. Efetov, M. M. Furchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, M. J. Ford, I. Aharonovich, and D. Englund, Tunable and high-purity room temperature single- photon emission from atomic defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Nature Communications 2017 8:18, 1 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Hanson and D

    R. Hanson and D. D. Awschalom, Coherent manipulation of single spins in semiconductors, Nature 2008 453:7198453, 1043 (2008)

    2008

  6. [6]

    J. L. O’Brien, Optical Quantum Computing, Science318, 1567 (2007)

    2007

  7. [7]

    Schirhagl, K

    R. Schirhagl, K. Chang, M. Loretz, and C. L. Degen, Nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond: Nanoscale sensors for physics and biology, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry65, 83 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Lamprecht, S

    D. Lamprecht, S. Chokappa, A. M. Freilinger, B. M. Mayer, M. Melchior, J. Dz´ ıbelov´ a, D. Lor- ber, L. H. Tizei, M. Kociak, C. Mangler, L. Filipovic, and J. Kotakoski, Single photon emitters in hBN: Limitations of atomic resolution imaging and potential sources of error, Ultrami- croscopy282, 114318 (2026)

    2026

  9. [9]

    Iv´ ady, G

    V. Iv´ ady, G. Barcza, G. Thiering, S. Li, H. Hamdi, J. P. Chou, O. Legeza, and A. Gali, Ab initio theory of the negatively charged boron vacancy qubit in hexagonal boron nitride, npj Computational Materials 2020 6:16, 41 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    T. Vogl, V. Iv´ ady, I. J. Luxmoore, and H. L. Stern, Defects in hexagonal boron nitride for quantum technologies: a perspective, 2D Materials13, 023001 (2026)

    2026

  11. [11]

    Bourrellier, S

    R. Bourrellier, S. Meuret, A. Tararan, O. St´ ephan, M. Kociak, L. H. Tizei, and A. Zobelli, Bright UV single photon emission at point defects in h-BN, Nano Letters16, 4317 (2016)

    2016

  12. [12]

    Zhigulin, K

    I. Zhigulin, K. Yamamura, V. Iv´ ady, A. Gale, J. Horder, C. J. Lobo, M. Kianinia, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Photophysics of blue quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride, Materials for Quantum Technology3, 015002 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    T. T. Tran, C. Elbadawi, D. Totonjian, C. J. Lobo, G. Grosso, H. Moon, D. R. Englund, M. J. Ford, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, Robust multicolor single photon emission from point 16 defects in hexagonal boron nitride, 2017 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) 2017-January, 1 (2017)

    2017

  14. [14]

    S. A. Tawfik, S. Ali, M. Fronzi, M. Kianinia, T. T. Tran, C. Stampfl, I. Aharonovich, M. Toth, and M. J. Ford, First-principles investigation of quantum emission from hBN defects, Nanoscale9(2017)

    2017

  15. [15]

    Mendelson, D

    N. Mendelson, D. Chugh, J. R. Reimers, T. S. Cheng, A. Gottscholl, H. Long, C. J. Mellor, A. Zettl, V. Dyakonov, P. H. Beton, S. V. Novikov, C. Jagadish, H. H. Tan, M. J. Ford, M. Toth, C. Bradac, and I. Aharonovich, Identifying carbon as the source of visible single- photon emission from hexagonal boron nitride, Nature Materials20(2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    Williams, A

    E. Williams, A. Gale, J. Horder, D. Scognamiglio, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Quantum Emitters in Flux Grown hBN, Crystal Growth and Design25, 2083 (2025)

    2083

  17. [17]

    H. Liu, N. Mendelson, I. H. Abidi, S. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Cai, K. Zhang, J. You, M. Tamtaji, H. Wong, Y. Ding, G. Chen, I. Aharonovich, and Z. Luo, Rational Control on Quantum Emitter Formation in Carbon-Doped Monolayer Hexagonal Boron Nitride, ACS Applied Ma- terials and Interfaces14, 3189 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    T. W. Tang, R. Ritika, M. Tamtaji, H. Liu, Y. Hu, Z. Liu, P. R. Galligan, M. Xu, J. Shen, J. Wang, J. You, Y. Li, G. H. Chen, I. Aharonovich, and Z. Luo, Structured-Defect Engineering of Hexagonal Boron Nitride for Identified Visible Single-Photon Emitters, ACS Nano19, 8509 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    Zhong, S

    D. Zhong, S. Gao, M. Saccone, J. R. Greer, M. Bernardi, S. Nadj-Perge, and A. Faraon, Carbon-Related Quantum Emitter in Hexagonal Boron Nitride with Homogeneous Energy and 3-Fold Polarization, Nano Letters24, 1106 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Ngamprapawat, J

    S. Ngamprapawat, J. Kawase, T. Nishimura, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Nagashio, S. Ngamprapawat, J. Kawase, T. Nishimura, K. Nagashio, K. Watanabe, and T. Taniguchi, From h-BN to Graphene: Characterizations of Hybrid Carbon-Doped h-BN for Applications in Electronic and Optoelectronic Devices, Advanced Electronic Materials9, 2300083 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    Y. T. Wu, X. Guo, P. T. Jing, G. L. Liu, Z. Cheng, J. L. Xu, Y. Bao, H. Xu, L. G. Zhang, D. Zhan, J. X. Yan, L. Liu, and D. Z. Shen, Site-Controlled Carbon Implantation for Quantum Emitter Engineering in Hexagonal Boron Nitride, ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces17, 64864 (2025). 17

    2025

  22. [22]

    X. Wei, M. S. Wang, Y. Bando, and D. Golberg, Electron-beam-induced substitutional carbon doping of boron nitride nanosheets, nanoribbons, and nanotubes, ACS Nano5(2011)

    2011

  23. [23]

    X. Wei, M. S. Wang, Y. Bando, and D. Golberg, Post-synthesis carbon doping of individual multiwalled boron nitride nanotubes via electron-beam irradiation, Journal of the American Chemical Society132(2010)

    2010

  24. [24]

    H. Park, Y. Wen, S. Xin Li, W. Choi, G.-D. Lee, M. Strano, J. H. Warner, H. Park, J. H. Warner, Y. Wen, S. X. Li, M. Strano, W. Choi, and G.-d. Lee, Atomically Precise Control of Carbon Insertion into hBN Monolayer Point Vacancies using a Focused Electron Beam Guide, Small17, 2100693 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    T. A. Bui, G. T. Leuthner, J. Madsen, M. R. Monazam, A. I. Chirita, A. Postl, C. Mangler, J. Kotakoski, and T. Susi, Creation of Single Vacancies in hBN with Electron Irradiation, Small19(2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Kotakoski, C

    J. Kotakoski, C. H. Jin, O. Lehtinen, K. Suenaga, and A. V. Krasheninnikov, Electron knock- on damage in hexagonal boron nitride monolayers, Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics82(2010)

    2010

  27. [27]

    Origin of circular and triangular pores in electron-irradiated hexagonal boron nitride

    U. Javed, C. Kofler, C. Mangler, and J. Kotakoski, Influence of low-pressure atmosphere in the pores formed in hexagonal boron nitride under electron irradiation, arXiv , 2507.13180 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Irschik, D

    P. Irschik, D. Lamprecht, S. Chokappa, C. Mangler, C. Speckmann, T. A. Bui, M. L¨ angle, L. Filipovic, and J. Kotakoski, Atomically clean free-standing two-dimensional materials through heating in ultra-high vacuum, 2D Materials13, 025001 (2026)

    2026

  29. [29]

    G. T. Leuthner, S. Hummel, C. Mangler, T. J. Pennycook, T. Susi, J. C. Meyer, and J. Kotakoski, Scanning transmission electron microscopy under controlled low-pressure at- mospheres, Ultramicroscopy203, 76 (2019)

    2019

  30. [30]

    E. H. ˚Ahlgren, A. Markevich, S. Scharinger, B. Fickl, G. Zagler, F. Herterich, N. McEvoy, C. Mangler, and J. Kotakoski, Atomic-Scale Oxygen-Mediated Etching of 2D MoS2 and MoTe2, Advanced Materials Interfaces9(2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    G. T. Leuthner, T. Susi, C. Mangler, J. C. Meyer, and J. Kotakoski, Chemistry at graphene edges in the electron microscope, 2D Materials8, 10.1088/2053-1583/abf624 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1088/2053-1583/abf624 2053

  32. [32]

    Kotakoski, D

    J. Kotakoski, D. Santos-Cottin, and A. V. Krasheninnikov, Stability of graphene edges under electron beam: Equilibrium energetics versus dynamic effects, ACS Nano6, 671 (2012). 18

    2012

  33. [33]

    S. Li, A. Pershin, G. Thiering, P. Udvarhelyi, and A. Gali, Ultraviolet Quantum Emitters in Hexagonal Boron Nitride from Carbon Clusters, Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters13, 3150 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    Z. Qiu, K. Vaklinova, P. Huang, M. Grzeszczyk, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. S. Novoselov, J. Lu, and M. Koperski, Atomic and Electronic Structure of Defects in hBN: Enhancing Single-Defect Functionalities, ACS Nano18, 24035 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    Mangler, J

    C. Mangler, J. Meyer, A. Mittelberger, K. Mustonen, T. Susi, and J. Kotakoski, A Materials Scientist’s CANVAS: A System for Controlled Alteration of Nanomaterials in Vacuum Down to the Atomic Scale, Microscopy and Microanalysis28, 2940 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    Speckmann, J

    C. Speckmann, J. Lang, J. Madsen, M. R. A. Monazam, G. Zagler, G. T. Leuthner, N. McEvoy, C. Mangler, T. Susi, and J. Kotakoski, Combined electronic excitation and knock-on damage in monolayer MoS2, Physical Review B107, 094112 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    T. Susi, T. P. Hardcastle, H. Hofs¨ ass, A. Mittelberger, T. J. Pennycook, C. Mangler, R. Drummond-Brydson, A. J. Scott, J. C. Meyer, and J. Kotakoski, Single-atom spectroscopy of phosphorus dopants implanted into graphene, 2D Materials4, 021013 (2017)

    2017

  38. [38]

    Susi, Quantifying phase magnitudes of open-source focused-probe 4D-STEM ptychography reconstructions, Journal of Microscopy300, 201 (2025)

    T. Susi, Quantifying phase magnitudes of open-source focused-probe 4D-STEM ptychography reconstructions, Journal of Microscopy300, 201 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    Varnavides, J

    G. Varnavides, J. M. Bekkevold, S. M. Ribet, M. C. Scott, L. Jones, and C. Ophus, Relaxing direct ptychography sampling requirements via parallax imaging insights, Microscopy and Microanalysis (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    quantEM, Quantitative electron microscopy data analysis toolkit,https://github.com/ electronmicroscopy/quantem(2026)

    2026

  41. [41]

    de la Pe˜ na, pburdet, M

    F. de la Pe˜ na, pburdet, M. Sarahan, magnunor, T. Ostasevicius, J. Taillon, A. Eljarrat, S. Mazzucco, vidartf, Ga¨ el, L. F. Zagonel, M. Walls, and iygr, Hyperspy: HyperSpy 0.8, Zenodo (2015)

    2015

  42. [42]

    de la Pe˜ na, E

    F. de la Pe˜ na, E. Prestat, P. Burdet, J. L¨ ahnemann, K. E. MacArthur, V. T. Fauske, M. Sara- han, C. Francis, D. N. Johnstone, T. Ostasevicius, V. Migunov, T. Furnival, M. Nord, S. Maz- zucco, A. Eljarrat, J. Caron, T. Aarholt, T. Poon, Z. Zhang, P. Jokubauskas, actions-user, F. Winkler, J. Taillon, T. Slater, pquinn-dls, G. Guzzinati, J. C. Myers, and...

    2025

  43. [43]

    EELS.info,https://eels.info/, [Online; accessed 26-May-2026]. 19 Supplemental Material Electron-beam-induced carbon doping of hexagonal boron nitride 20 Dataset A 1 | 3:25 min 1.0×1010 e/nm2 2 | 7:13 min 2.12×1010 e/nm2 3 | 11:17 min 3.31×1010 e/nm2 4 | 15:08 min 4.44×1010 e/nm2 5 | 18:56 min 5.55×1010 e/nm2 6 | 23:10 min 6.80×1010 e/nm2 7 | 27:04 min 7.9...

    2026