pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28903 · v1 · pith:SWCOAYOMnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

The energy conditions and model selection in the local Universe

Namit Chandak , Fulvio Melia , Junjie Wei This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 10:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords energy conditionsRh=ct universeLambdaCDMHII galaxiescosmic chronometersmodel selectionlocal universe
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Rh=ct universe fits local expansion data with 92 percent likelihood and satisfies all four energy conditions while LambdaCDM violates the strong energy condition at low redshifts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper compares the standard LambdaCDM model to the Rh=ct universe using HII galaxy and cosmic chronometer measurements that trace the expansion history in the local universe. It finds that the data assign the Rh=ct model roughly 92 percent likelihood and only 8 percent to LambdaCDM. The best-fit Rh=ct expansion history obeys all four principal energy conditions of general relativity. LambdaCDM's best fit instead violates the strong energy condition below redshift 2. A reader would care because the energy conditions forbid negative energies and repulsive gravity, so their violation in LambdaCDM implies the presence of exotic matter.

Core claim

Using a combination of HII galaxy and cosmic chronometer measurements in the local Universe, the Rh=ct cosmology receives a likelihood of approximately 92 percent versus 8 percent for LambdaCDM, and its optimized fit complies with all four energy conditions while LambdaCDM's best fit violates the strong energy condition at redshifts less than or equal to 2.

What carries the argument

Model selection between LambdaCDM and the Rh=ct universe by comparing their predicted expansion histories directly to the four principal energy conditions using local-universe distance and age data.

If this is right

  • The Rh=ct universe requires no exotic matter to remain consistent with the energy conditions in the local universe.
  • LambdaCDM requires exotic matter to produce the observed violation of the strong energy condition at low redshifts.
  • The local data alone already produce a strong statistical preference for the Rh=ct model over LambdaCDM.
  • Compliance with the energy conditions holds for the optimized parameters of the Rh=ct fit but not for those of LambdaCDM.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the preference for Rh=ct holds at higher redshifts, it would imply that the apparent acceleration can be described without a cosmological constant while still obeying general relativity's energy conditions.
  • The result raises the possibility that the strong energy condition violation inferred in LambdaCDM is an artifact of assuming a constant dark-energy density rather than a feature of the true expansion history.
  • Extending the same comparison to supernova or baryon-acoustic-oscillation data at intermediate redshifts would test whether the energy-condition compliance of Rh=ct persists beyond the local universe.

Load-bearing premise

The HII galaxy and cosmic chronometer measurements in the local Universe provide unbiased constraints on the expansion history that can be compared to the energy conditions without significant systematic errors or model-dependent corrections.

What would settle it

An independent set of expansion-rate measurements at redshifts between 0.5 and 2 that yields a best-fit history violating the strong energy condition in the specific manner predicted by the LambdaCDM parameters while remaining inconsistent with the Rh=ct prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28903 by Fulvio Melia, Junjie Wei, Namit Chandak.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Distance modulus for the HII galaxy data in the optimized, flat ΛCDM model. The violation of the SEC limit (blue curve) by the standard model prediction (dashed curve) becomes apparent in the redshift range z ⊂ (0.2, 1.5), as high￾lighted by the magnified view in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: 1D probability distributions and 2D region with the 1 − 2σ contours corresponding to the parameters γ, and β in the Rh = ct universe fit (fig. 4) to the HII galaxy data. ters are optimized for each model and dataset. The opti￾mizations are done using the Python Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) module, EMCEE [70], and we discuss the results for each dataset and cosmological model in the fol￾lowing subsection… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: 5.1.2 The Rh = ct universe By comparison, the Rh = ct universe has only one free parameter, H0, apart from the two coefficients α, and β, so [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The optimized flat-ΛCDM fit to the cosmic chronometer data. In this case, the violation of the SEC by the standard model can be seen within the redshift range z ⊂ (0, 1.75), confirming the result for the HII data in Fig￾ures 1 and 2. 55 60 65 70 75 H0 0.15 0.30 0.45 0.60 m 0.15 0.30 0.45 0.60 m [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: 1D probability distribution corresponding to the only parameter, H0, in the Rh = ct universe fit (fig. 8) to the cosmic chronometer data. after re-parameterization, the parameters to be optimized are γ, and β. The optimized fit is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The flat-ΛCDM fit to the HII galaxy data based on the maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters using the combined HII galaxy and cosmic chronometer measurements. The standard model’s violation of the SEC, seen at interme￾diate redshifts in Figures 1, 2 and 6, persists with the joint analysis. 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 z 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 H(z) NEC Lower Bound SEC Lower Boun… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The flat-ΛCDM fit to the cosmic chronometer data based on the maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters using the combined HII galaxy and cosmic chronometer data. Based on this joint optimization, the SEC violation by the standard model can again be seen at z ⊂ (0, 2). 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 m 33.3 33.6 33.9 34.2 34.5 56 60 64 68 72 H0 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0 0.32 0.40 0.48 0.56 m 33.3 33.6 33.9 34.2 34.5 4.4 … view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: 1D probability distributions and 2D regions with the 1−2σ contours corresponding to the parameters α, β, and H0 in the Rh = ct universe fit (figs. 13 and 14) to the combined HII galaxy + cosmic chronometer data. consistency between the standard model and the energy conditions arises in several areas, most noticeably during the hypothesized inflationary expansion shortly after the Big Bang. Ironically, the… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The four principal energy conditions (ECs) in general relativity prohibit negative energies, repulsive gravity and superluminal energy flows. One must invoke exotic matter to violate any one of these, yet $\Lambda$CDM does so quite prominently during inflation and in the epoch of dark energy dominance. In this paper, we carry out model selection between the standard model and the $R_{\rm h}=ct$ universe using a combination of HII galaxy and cosmic chronometer measurements in the local Universe, and directly compare the results to the constraints imposed by the ECs. We find that the latter cosmology is not only strongly favored by these data, with a likelihood of $\sim 92\%$ versus only $\sim 8\%$ for the former, but that its optimized fit is fully compliant with all four ECs, while $\Lambda$CDM's best fit violates the so-called strong energy condition at $z\lesssim 2$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs model selection between ΛCDM and the Rh=ct cosmology using combined HII-galaxy and cosmic-chronometer data in the local Universe. It reports that Rh=ct is strongly preferred (∼92 % likelihood versus ∼8 % for ΛCDM) and that the optimized Rh=ct expansion history satisfies all four energy conditions while the ΛCDM best fit violates the strong energy condition at z ≲ 2.

Significance. If the likelihood ratio and energy-condition compliance are robust, the result would constitute a direct, data-driven challenge to ΛCDM on the basis of local expansion-history measurements and would strengthen the case for the Rh=ct model. The approach of confronting both models with the same dataset and then testing the resulting best-fit histories against the energy conditions is logically coherent and could be extended to other probes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Data and likelihood analysis] The reported 92 % / 8 % likelihood ratio rests on the assumption that the HII-galaxy L–σ calibration residuals and the cosmic-chronometer stellar-population corrections are uncorrelated with the functional form of H(z). No quantitative test of this assumption (e.g., residual plots versus the Rh=ct versus ΛCDM predictions) is provided; if the residuals systematically favor a linear coasting solution, both the likelihood ratio and the subsequent energy-condition statements become unreliable.
  2. [Energy-condition evaluation] The statement that ΛCDM violates the strong energy condition at z ≲ 2 is made for the best-fit parameters obtained from the local data alone. Because the chronometer and HII-galaxy samples extend only to modest redshift, it is unclear whether the violation persists when the same parameter values are extrapolated or whether it is an artifact of the limited redshift lever arm; an explicit plot of ρ + 3p versus z for the reported best-fit ΛCDM parameters is needed.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states the likelihood percentages to two significant figures; the corresponding section should report the actual Δχ² or evidence ratio together with the number of degrees of freedom so that the reader can judge the statistical significance.
  2. Notation for the four energy conditions should be defined explicitly (e.g., NEC, WEC, SEC, DEC) at first use rather than assuming familiarity with the acronyms.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested diagnostic material into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Data and likelihood analysis] The reported 92 % / 8 % likelihood ratio rests on the assumption that the HII-galaxy L–σ calibration residuals and the cosmic-chronometer stellar-population corrections are uncorrelated with the functional form of H(z). No quantitative test of this assumption (e.g., residual plots versus the Rh=ct versus ΛCDM predictions) is provided; if the residuals systematically favor a linear coasting solution, both the likelihood ratio and the subsequent energy-condition statements become unreliable.

    Authors: We agree that residual plots versus model predictions constitute a useful diagnostic. In the revised manuscript we will add such plots for both the HII-galaxy and cosmic-chronometer datasets, comparing the residuals obtained under the Rh=ct and ΛCDM best fits. These plots will allow direct visual assessment of any systematic trends that might correlate with the assumed functional form of H(z). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Energy-condition evaluation] The statement that ΛCDM violates the strong energy condition at z ≲ 2 is made for the best-fit parameters obtained from the local data alone. Because the chronometer and HII-galaxy samples extend only to modest redshift, it is unclear whether the violation persists when the same parameter values are extrapolated or whether it is an artifact of the limited redshift lever arm; an explicit plot of ρ + 3p versus z for the reported best-fit ΛCDM parameters is needed.

    Authors: We will include an explicit plot of ρ + 3p versus redshift evaluated at the best-fit ΛCDM parameters obtained from the local data. The plot will span the range 0 ≤ z ≤ 3 to show that the violation of the strong energy condition occurs at z ≲ 2 and is a direct consequence of the parameter values constrained by the data rather than an extrapolation artifact. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses independent data fits

full rationale

The paper fits two cosmologies to external HII galaxy and cosmic chronometer data in the local Universe, then evaluates likelihood ratios and energy-condition compliance on those fits. No quoted step reduces the reported 92%/8% ratio or the EC statements to a self-definition, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain whose content is unverified outside this work. The Rh=ct model appears via prior literature, but the present analysis supplies new, falsifiable constraints from the cited datasets, rendering the central claims self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, preventing a complete audit of free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; no explicit new entities are mentioned.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5690 in / 1168 out tokens · 25116 ms · 2026-06-29T10:27:04.888588+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · 37 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. A. Starobinski ˇi,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 30(Dec., 1979) 682

    1979

  2. [2]

    Kazanas,Dynamics of the universe and spontaneous symmetry breaking, ApJ Letters241(Oct., 1980) L59–L63

    D. Kazanas,Dynamics of the universe and spontaneous symmetry breaking, ApJ Letters241(Oct., 1980) L59–L63

    1980

  3. [3]

    A. H. Guth,Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, PRD23(Jan., 1981) 347–356

    1981

  4. [4]

    A. D. Linde,A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems, Physics Letters B108(Feb., 1982) 389–393

    1982

  5. [5]

    DESI Collaboration, A. G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, G. Aldering, D. M. Alexander, R. Alfarsy, C. Allende Prieto, M. Alvarez, and et al.,The Early Data Release of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, Astronomical Journal168(Aug., 2024) 58, [arXiv:2306.06308]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    K. M. Pontoppidan, J. Barrientes, C. Blome, H. Braun, M. Brown, M. Carruthers, D. Coe, J. DePasquale, N. Espinoza, M. G. Marin, and et al.,The JWST Early Release Observations, ApJ Letters936(Sept., 2022) L14, [arXiv:2207.13067]

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    S. L. Finkelstein, M. B. Bagley, P. Arrabal Haro, M. Dickinson, H. C. Ferguson, J. S. Kartaltepe, C. Papovich, D. Burgarella, D. D. Kocevski, M. Huertas-Company, and et al.,A Long Time Ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away: A Candidate z∼12 Galaxy in Early JWST CEERS Imaging, ApJ Letters940(Dec.,

  8. [8]

    L55, [arXiv:2207.12474]

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    T. Treu, G. Roberts-Borsani, M. Bradac, G. Brammer, A. Fontana, A. Henry, C. Mason, T. Morishita, L. Pentericci, X. Wang, and et al.,The GLASS-JWST Early Release Science Program. I. Survey Design and Release Plans, ApJ935(Aug., 2022) 110, [arXiv:2206.07978]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Carniani, K

    S. Carniani, K. Hainline, F. D’Eugenio, D. J. Eisenstein, P. Jakobsen, J. Witstok, B. D. Johnson, J. Chevallard, R. Maiolino, J. M. Helton, and et al.,Spectroscopic confirmation of two luminous galaxies at a redshift of 14, Nature633(Sept., 2024) 318–322, [arXiv:2405.18485]

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, and et al.,Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation, A&A571(Nov., 2014) A22, [arXiv:1303.5082]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, and et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, A&A 641(Sept., 2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    P. A. Oesch, G. Brammer, P. G. van Dokkum, G. D. Illingworth, R. J. Bouwens, I. Labb´ e, M. Franx, I. Momcheva, M. L. N. Ashby, G. G. Fazio, V. Gonzalez, B. Holden, D. Magee, R. E. Skelton, R. Smit, L. R. Spitler, M. Trenti, and S. P. Willner,A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at z=11.1 Measured with Hubble Space Telescope Grism Spectroscopy,ApJ819(Mar., 2016) ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Melia,Strong observational support for theR h =ct timeline in the early universe, Physics of the Dark Universe46(Dec., 2024) 101587, [arXiv:2407.15279]

    F. Melia,Strong observational support for theR h =ct timeline in the early universe, Physics of the Dark Universe46(Dec., 2024) 101587, [arXiv:2407.15279]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Melia,The cosmic timeline implied by the highest redshift quasars, ApJ Letterssubmitted(Jan., 2024)

    F. Melia,The cosmic timeline implied by the highest redshift quasars, ApJ Letterssubmitted(Jan., 2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    Melia,Strong Observational Support for theR h =ct Timeline in the Early Universe, Physics of the Dark Universesubmitted(Jan., 2024)

    F. Melia,Strong Observational Support for theR h =ct Timeline in the Early Universe, Physics of the Dark Universesubmitted(Jan., 2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    Melia,A Candid Assessment of Standard Cosmology, Pub Astron Soc Pacific134(Dec., 2022) 121001

    F. Melia,A Candid Assessment of Standard Cosmology, Pub Astron Soc Pacific134(Dec., 2022) 121001

    2022

  18. [18]

    Melia, The Cosmic Spacetime

    F. Melia, The Cosmic Spacetime. Taylor and Francis, Oxford, 2020

    2020

  19. [19]

    Melia, The Physics of Cosmology

    F. Melia, The Physics of Cosmology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2026

    2026

  20. [21]

    A Solution to the electroweak horizon problem in the R_h=ct universe

    F. Melia,A solution to the electroweak horizon problem in the Rh=ct universe, European Physical Journal C78 (Sept., 2018) 739, [arXiv:1809.02885]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [22]

    Melia,The Friedmann-Lemaˆ ıtre-Robertson-Walker metric, Modern Physics Letters A37(Jan., 2022) 2250016

    F. Melia,The Friedmann-Lemaˆ ıtre-Robertson-Walker metric, Modern Physics Letters A37(Jan., 2022) 2250016

    2022

  22. [23]

    de Graaff, H.-W

    A. de Graaff, H.-W. Rix, S. Carniani, K. A. Suess, S. Charlot, E. Curtis-Lake, S. Arribas, W. M. Baker, K. Boyett, A. J. Bunker, and et al.,Ionised gas kinematics and dynamical masses of z≳6 galaxies from JADES/NIRSpec high-resolution spectroscopy, A&A684 (Apr., 2024) A87, [arXiv:2308.09742]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [24]

    Ch´ avez, R

    R. Ch´ avez, R. Terlevich, E. Terlevich, A. L. Gonz´ alez-Mor´ an, D. Fern´ andez-Arenas, F. Bresolin, M. Plionis, S. Basilakos, R. Amor´ ın, and M. Llerena, Mapping the Hubble flow from z ˜0 to z ˜7.5 with H II Galaxies, MNRAS538(Apr., 2025) 1264–1271, [arXiv:2404.16261]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [25]

    New constraints on cosmological parameters and neutrino properties using the expansion rate of the Universe to z~1.75

    M. Moresco, L. Verde, L. Pozzetti, R. Jimenez, and A. Cimatti,New constraints on cosmological parameters and neutrino properties using the expansion rate of the Universe to z ˜1.75, JCAP2012(July, 2012) 053, [arXiv:1201.6658]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [26]

    Improved constraints on the expansion rate of the Universe up to z~1.1 from the spectroscopic evolution of cosmic chronometers

    M. Moresco, A. Cimatti, R. Jimenez, L. Pozzetti, G. Zamorani, M. Bolzonella, J. Dunlop, F. Lamareille, 14 Chandak, Melia and Wei: Energy conditions in the local Universe M. Mignoli, H. Pearce, and et al.,Improved constraints on the expansion rate of the Universe up to z ˜1.1 from the spectroscopic evolution of cosmic chronometers, JCAP2012(Aug., 2012) 006...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [27]

    Energy Conditions and Cosmic Acceleration

    J. Santos, J. S. Alcaniz, N. Pires, and M. J. Rebou¸ cas, Energy conditions and cosmic acceleration, PRD75 (Apr., 2007) 083523, [astro-ph/0702728]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  27. [28]

    Melia,Validation of the Numen Field by the Energy Conditions in the Early Universe, Annalen der Physik 535(Sept., 2023) 2300157

    F. Melia,Validation of the Numen Field by the Energy Conditions in the Early Universe, Annalen der Physik 535(Sept., 2023) 2300157

    2023

  28. [29]

    Raychaudhuri,Relativistic Cosmology

    A. Raychaudhuri,Relativistic Cosmology. I, Physical Review98(May, 1955) 1123–1126

    1955

  29. [30]

    Penrose,Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singularities, PRL14(Jan., 1965) 57–59

    R. Penrose,Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singularities, PRL14(Jan., 1965) 57–59

    1965

  30. [31]

    S. W. Hawking,The Occurrence of Singularities in Cosmology. II, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A295(Dec., 1966) 490–493

    1966

  31. [32]

    S. W. Hawking,The Occurrence of Singularities in Cosmology. III. Causality and Singularities, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A300(Aug., 1967) 187–201

    1967

  32. [33]

    S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose,The Singularities of Gravitational Collapse and Cosmology, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A314(Jan., 1970) 529–548

    1970

  33. [34]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The large-scale structure of space-time. Cambridge University Press, 1973

    1973

  34. [35]

    Curiel, A Primer on Energy Conditions, pp

    E. Curiel, A Primer on Energy Conditions, pp. 43–104. Springer New York, New York, NY, 2017

    2017

  35. [36]

    J. L. Friedman, K. Schleich, and D. M. Witt,Topological censorship, PRL71(Sept., 1993) 1486–1489, [gr-qc/9305017]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  36. [37]

    Schoen and S.-T

    R. Schoen and S.-T. Yau,Positivity of the total mass of a general space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett.43(Nov, 1979) 1457–1459

    1979

  37. [38]

    S. A. Fulling, Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime. Cambridge University Press, 1989

    1989

  38. [39]

    Scale anomalies imply violation of the averaged null energy condition

    M. Visser,Scale anomalies imply violation of the averaged null energy condition, Physics Letters B349 (Feb., 1995) 443–447, [gr-qc/9409043]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  39. [40]

    No smooth beginning for spacetime

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners, and N. Turok,No Smooth Beginning for Spacetime, PRL119(Oct., 2017) 171301, [arXiv:1705.00192]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [41]

    Poisson, A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics

    E. Poisson, A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007

    2007

  41. [42]

    Classical and semi-classical energy conditions

    P. Mart´ ın-Moruno and M. Visser,Classical and Semi-classical Energy Conditions, Fundamental Theories of Physics189(Jan., 2017) 193, [arXiv:1702.05915]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [43]

    Null energy condition and superluminal propagation

    S. Dubovsky, T. Gr´ egoire, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi, Null energy condition and superluminal propagation, Journal of High Energy Physics2006(Mar., 2006) [hep-th/0512260]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  43. [44]

    R. V. Buniy, S. D. H. Hsu, and B. M. Murray,The null energy condition and instability, PRD74(Sept., 2006) 063518, [hep-th/0606091]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  44. [45]

    Lobo and P

    F. Lobo and P. Crawford,Weak Energy Condition Violation and Superluminal Travel, in Current Trends in Relativistic Astrophysics (L. Fern´ andez-Jambrina and L. M. Gonz´ alez-Romero, eds.), vol. 617, p. 277. Springer, 2003

    2003

  45. [46]

    M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne,Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity, American Journal of Physics56(May,

  46. [47]

    The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity

    M. Alcubierre,LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity, Classical and Quantum Gravity11(May, 1994) L73–L77, [gr-qc/0009013]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  47. [48]

    Kontou and K

    E.-A. Kontou and K. Sanders,Energy conditions in general relativity and quantum field theory, Classical and Quantum Gravity37(Oct., 2020) 193001, [arXiv:2003.01815]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [49]

    T. A. Roman,Quantum stress-energy tensors and the weak energy condition, PRD33(June, 1986) 3526–3533

    1986

  49. [50]

    A. L. Gonz´ alez-Mor´ an, R. Ch´ avez, E. Terlevich, R. Terlevich, D. Fern´ andez-Arenas, F. Bresolin, M. Plionis, J. Melnick, S. Basilakos, and E. Telles, Independent cosmological constraints from high-z H II galaxies: new results from VLT-KMOS data, MNRAS 505(July, 2021) 1441–1457, [arXiv:2105.04025]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [51]

    Llerena, R

    M. Llerena, R. Amor´ ın, L. Pentericci, A. Calabr` o, A. E. Shapley, K. Boutsia, E. P´ erez-Montero, J. M. V´ ılchez, and K. Nakajima,Ionized gas kinematics and chemical abundances of low-mass star-forming galaxies at z∼3, A&A676(Aug., 2023) A53, [arXiv:2303.01536]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [52]

    On the road to precision cosmology with high redshift HII galaxies

    R. Terlevich, E. Terlevich, J. Melnick, R. Ch´ avez, M. Plionis, F. Bresolin, and S. Basilakos,On the road to precision cosmology with high-redshift H II galaxies, MNRAS451(Aug., 2015) 3001–3010, [arXiv:1505.04376]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  52. [53]

    The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-Forming Galaxies

    D. Calzetti, L. Armus, R. C. Bohlin, A. L. Kinney, J. Koornneef, and T. Storchi-Bergmann,The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies, ApJ533(Apr., 2000) 682–695, [astro-ph/9911459]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  53. [54]

    Determining the Hubble constant using Giant extragalactic HII regions and HII galaxies

    R. Ch´ avez, E. Terlevich, R. Terlevich, M. Plionis, F. Bresolin, S. Basilakos, and J. Melnick,Determining the Hubble constant using giant extragalactic H II regions and H II galaxies, MNRAS425(Sept., 2012) L56–L60, [arXiv:1203.6222]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  54. [55]

    The $L - \sigma$ relation for massive bursts of star formation

    R. Ch´ avez, R. Terlevich, E. Terlevich, F. Bresolin, J. Melnick, M. Plionis, and S. Basilakos,The L-σrelation for massive bursts of star formation, MNRAS442 (Aug., 2014) 3565–3597, [arXiv:1405.4010]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  55. [56]

    Melia, The edge of infinity

    F. Melia, The edge of infinity. Supermassive black holes in the universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003

    2003

  56. [57]

    The Cosmic Horizon

    F. Melia,The cosmic horizon, MNRAS382(Dec., 2007) 1917–1921, [arXiv:0711.4181]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  57. [58]

    The Cosmological Spacetime

    F. Melia and M. Abdelqader,The Cosmological Spacetime, International Journal of Modern Physics D18 (Jan., 2009) 1889–1901, [arXiv:0907.5394]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  58. [59]

    The R_h = ct Universe

    F. Melia and A. S. H. Shevchuk,The R h=ct universe, MNRAS419(Jan., 2012) 2579–2586, [arXiv:1109.5189]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  59. [60]

    Dunlop, J

    J. Dunlop, J. Peacock, H. Spinrad, A. Dey, R. Jimenez, D. Stern, and R. Windhorst,A 3.5-Gyr-old galaxy at redshift 1.55, Nature381(June, 1996) 581–584

    1996

  60. [61]

    LBDS 53W091: An Old red Galaxy at z=1.552

    H. Spinrad, A. Dey, D. Stern, J. Dunlop, J. Peacock, R. Jimenez, and R. Windhorst,LBDS 53W091: An Old, Red Galaxy at z = 1.552, ApJ484(July, 1997) 581–601, [astro-ph/9702233]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  61. [62]

    L. L. Cowie, A. Songaila, and A. J. Barger,Evidence for a Gradual Decline in the Universal Rest-Frame Ultraviolet Chandak, Melia and Wei: Energy conditions in the local Universe 15 Luminosity Density for Z ¡ 1, Astronomical Journal118 (Aug., 1999) 603–612, [astro-ph/9904345]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  62. [63]

    The Complete Star Formation History of the Universe

    A. Heavens, B. Panter, R. Jimenez, and J. Dunlop,The star-formation history of the Universe from the stellar populations of nearby galaxies, Nature428(Apr., 2004) 625–627, [astro-ph/0403293]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  63. [64]

    The epochs of early-type galaxy formation as a function of environment

    D. Thomas, C. Maraston, R. Bender, and C. Mendes de Oliveira,The Epochs of Early-Type Galaxy Formation as a Function of Environment, ApJ621(Mar., 2005) 673–694, [astro-ph/0410209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  64. [65]

    The star formation histories of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

    B. Panter, R. Jimenez, A. F. Heavens, and S. Charlot, The star formation histories of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, MNRAS378(July, 2007) 1550–1564, [astro-ph/0608531]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  65. [66]

    T. Treu, R. S. Ellis, T. X. Liao, P. G. van Dokkum, P. Tozzi, A. Coil, J. Newman, M. C. Cooper, and M. Davis,The Assembly History of Field Spheroidals: Evolution of Mass-to-Light Ratios and Signatures of Recent Star Formation, ApJ633(Nov., 2005) 174–197, [astro-ph/0503164]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  66. [67]

    Constraining the expansion rate of the Universe using low-redshift ellipticals as cosmic chronometers

    M. Moresco, R. Jimenez, A. Cimatti, and L. Pozzetti, Constraining the expansion rate of the Universe using low-redshift ellipticals as cosmic chronometers, JCAP 2011(Mar., 2011) 045, [arXiv:1010.0831]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  67. [68]

    P. G. van Dokkum and M. Franx,The Fundamental Plane in CL 0024 at z = 0.4: implications for the evolution of the mass-to-light ratio., MNRAS281(Aug.,

  68. [69]

    985–1000, [astro-ph/9603063]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [70]

    Simon, L

    J. Simon, L. Verde, and R. Jimenez,Constraints on the redshift dependence of the dark energy potential, PRD71 (June, 2005) 123001, [astro-ph/0412269]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  70. [71]

    Cosmic Chronometers: Constraining the Equation of State of Dark Energy. II. A Spectroscopic Catalog of Red Galaxies in Galaxy Clusters

    D. Stern, R. Jimenez, L. Verde, S. A. Stanford, and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmic Chronometers: Constraining the Equation of State of Dark Energy. II. A Spectroscopic Catalog of Red Galaxies in Galaxy Clusters, ApJ Supplements188(May, 2010) 280–289, [arXiv:0907.3152]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  71. [72]

    emcee: The MCMC Hammer

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman,emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Pub Astron Soc Pacific125(Mar., 2013) 306, [arXiv:1202.3665]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  72. [73]

    Wei and F

    J.-J. Wei and F. Melia,Model selection using the HII galaxy Hubble diagram, MNRAS542(Sept., 2025) L19–L23, [arXiv:2506.04819]

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [74]

    Schwarz,Estimating the Dimension of a Model, Annals of Statistics6(July, 1978) 461–464

    G. Schwarz,Estimating the Dimension of a Model, Annals of Statistics6(July, 1978) 461–464

    1978

  74. [75]

    Cosmic Chronometers in the R_h=ct Universe

    F. Melia and R. S. Maier,Cosmic chronometers in the Rh = ct Universe, MNRAS432(July, 2013) 2669–2675, [arXiv:1304.1802]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  75. [76]

    A. G. Riess, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, D. Scolnic, D. Brout, S. Casertano, D. O. Jones, Y. Murakami, G. S. Anand, L. Breuval, T. G. Brink, A. V. Filippenko, S. Hoffmann, S. W. Jha, W. D’arcy Kenworthy, J. Mackenty, B. E. Stahl, and W. Zheng,A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s −1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble S...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  76. [77]

    The HII Galaxy Hubble Diagram Strongly Favors $R_{\rm h}=ct$ over $\Lambda$CDM

    J.-J. Wei, X.-F. Wu, and F. Melia,The H II galaxy Hubble diagram strongly favours R h = ct overΛCDM, MNRAS463(Dec., 2016) 1144–1152, [arXiv:1608.02070]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  77. [78]

    Inflationary paradigm in trouble after Planck2013

    A. Ijjas, P. J. Steinhardt, and A. Loeb,Inflationary paradigm in trouble after Planck2013, Physics Letters B 723(June, 2013) 261–266, [arXiv:1304.2785]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  78. [79]

    Liu and F

    J. Liu and F. Melia,Viability of slow-roll inflation in light of the non-zero k min measured in the cosmic microwave background power spectrum, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A476(July, 2020) 20200364, [arXiv:2006.02510]

    work page arXiv 2020

  79. [80]

    The R_h=ct Universe Without Inflation

    F. Melia,The R h = ct universe without inflation, A&A 553(May, 2013) A76, [arXiv:1206.6527]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013