pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28926 · v1 · pith:VRZRVIHHnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ✦ hep-th

Multi-Loop Negative Geometries

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 10:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords negative geometriesAmplituhedroncusp anomalous dimensionpolylogarithmsWilson loopsN=4 SYMscattering amplitudesloop integrands
0
0 comments X

The pith

Negative geometries reproduce the integrand for the logarithm of the scattering amplitude, allowing an explicit three-loop computation that yields the cusp anomalous dimension upon integration.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that negative geometries serve as the geometric building blocks for the integrand of the logarithm of planar scattering amplitudes in N=4 super Yang-Mills, in direct analogy to the Amplituhedron for the amplitude itself. At four points this produces an infrared-finite function F(g,z) that depends on the coupling and a single cross ratio. An explicit three-loop evaluation of all such geometries reveals that the number of internal cycles in each diagram controls the depth of the resulting polylogarithms. Integrating F over the cross ratio extracts the cusp anomalous dimension, while separate odd and even zeta sectors show suppression of higher-cycle contributions and certain one-cycle series admit all-order resummation.

Core claim

Negative geometries reproduce the integrand for the logarithm of the scattering amplitude. At three loops all such geometries are computed explicitly, showing that diagrams with more internal cycles produce polylogarithms of lower depth. The integral of F(g,z) over z equals the cusp anomalous dimension Gamma_cusp. Higher-cycle diagrams are suppressed when odd and even zeta contributions are considered separately. Convergent infinite series of one-cycle diagrams can be resummed to all loop orders.

What carries the argument

Negative geometries, the geometric regions whose canonical forms supply the integrand for the logarithm of the amplitude.

If this is right

  • Integrating the finite quantity F(g,z) over the cross ratio directly produces the cusp anomalous dimension.
  • Higher-cycle diagrams are suppressed in the separate odd and even zeta sectors of the expansion.
  • Certain convergent series of one-cycle diagrams admit explicit all-loop resummation.
  • The link between cycle count and polylog depth organizes the three-loop result.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same geometric construction might be used to generate higher-loop contributions to Gamma_cusp without enumerating all diagrams by hand.
  • The observed cycle-polylog correlation could extend to other finite observables built from Wilson loops with Lagrangian insertions.
  • Resummed one-cycle series may connect to closed-form expressions known from integrability or strong-coupling methods.

Load-bearing premise

Negative geometries reproduce the integrand for the logarithm of the scattering amplitude in the same way the Amplituhedron does for the amplitude itself.

What would settle it

A mismatch at three loops between the F(g,z) obtained by summing negative geometries and the known perturbative Wilson-loop result for the same quantity would falsify the reproduction property.

read the original abstract

Scattering amplitudes in planar ${\cal N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory are dual to expectation values of null polygonal Wilson loops. The Amplituhedron provides a geometric construction for the all-loop integrand as the canonical form on the geometric region in the Grassmannian defined by a certain set of inequalities. For a closely related object, the logarithm of the scattering amplitude, the integrand is reproduced in a similar way using negative geometries. When integrated over all loop momenta except one, the result is infrared (IR) finite and equal to the expectation value of a certain Wilson loop with a Lagrangian insertion. At four points, this quantity, ${\cal F}(g,z)$ only depends on a single cross ratio $z$ and the 't Hooft coupling $g$. At weak coupling, it is known up to three loops from perturbative Wilson loop computations and at strong coupling through the AdS/CFT correspondence at leading order. In this paper, we explore this object further through the lens of the Amplituhedron and negative geometries, which provide very natural IR finite building blocks. We perform an explicit three-loop computation of all negative geometries and show that the number of internal cycles in the diagram is closely linked to the depth of polylogarithms. We calculate the cusp anomalous dimension $\Gamma_{\rm cusp}$ by integrating ${\cal F}(g,z)$ over $z$. We show that the higher-cycle diagrams are suppressed if we consider separate odd and even zeta contributions. Furthermore, we focus on certain convergent infinite series of one-cycle diagrams, perform all-loop order resummations of such contributions, and discuss various features of the result.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses negative geometries, defined analogously to the Amplituhedron, to compute the IR-finite quantity F(g,z) at three loops for the logarithm of the four-point scattering amplitude in planar N=4 SYM. It reports an explicit enumeration of all such geometries, establishes a correspondence between the number of internal cycles and polylogarithm depth, extracts the cusp anomalous dimension Γ_cusp via integration of F(g,z) over the cross-ratio z, demonstrates suppression of higher-cycle diagrams upon separating odd and even zeta contributions, and performs all-loop resummations of convergent infinite series of one-cycle diagrams.

Significance. If the negative geometries correctly reproduce the log-amplitude integrand, the work supplies concrete three-loop data and all-order resummations that could illuminate the structure of IR-finite observables and the cusp anomalous dimension. The explicit cycle-polylog link and the separation into odd/even zeta sectors are potentially useful organizing principles for higher-loop computations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and the three-loop computation section] The central claim that the three-loop sum over negative geometries yields the physical F(g,z) (and hence the correct Γ_cusp after z-integration) rests on the unverified assertion that these geometries reproduce the integrand of log(A) exactly as the Amplituhedron does for A. No coefficient-by-coefficient comparison of the computed F(g,z) against the known three-loop Wilson-loop expansion is presented before the integration step that produces Γ_cusp.
  2. [Sections discussing suppression and resummation] The statements that higher-cycle diagrams are suppressed when odd and even zeta contributions are treated separately, and that the one-cycle series admit all-loop resummations, inherit the same verification gap; without an explicit match to the known perturbative expansion of F(g,z), these structural observations cannot be confirmed to apply to the physical theory.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the cross ratio z and the coupling g should be defined explicitly at first use, and the precise definition of F(g,z) as the Wilson loop with Lagrangian insertion should be recalled for readers unfamiliar with the prior literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and agree that additional explicit verification will strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and the three-loop computation section] The central claim that the three-loop sum over negative geometries yields the physical F(g,z) (and hence the correct Γ_cusp after z-integration) rests on the unverified assertion that these geometries reproduce the integrand of log(A) exactly as the Amplituhedron does for A. No coefficient-by-coefficient comparison of the computed F(g,z) against the known three-loop Wilson-loop expansion is presented before the integration step that produces Γ_cusp.

    Authors: The negative geometries are defined by construction to reproduce the integrand of log(A) in direct analogy with the Amplituhedron for A. Our three-loop enumeration follows from this geometric prescription. We nevertheless agree that an explicit coefficient-by-coefficient comparison of the resulting F(g,z) with the known three-loop Wilson-loop expansion, prior to z-integration, would provide stronger confirmation. We will add this comparison as a new subsection in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Sections discussing suppression and resummation] The statements that higher-cycle diagrams are suppressed when odd and even zeta contributions are treated separately, and that the one-cycle series admit all-loop resummations, inherit the same verification gap; without an explicit match to the known perturbative expansion of F(g,z), these structural observations cannot be confirmed to apply to the physical theory.

    Authors: These observations are obtained within the same negative-geometry framework. With the addition of the explicit three-loop coefficient comparison described above, the suppression of higher-cycle diagrams in the separated odd/even zeta sectors and the validity of the one-cycle resummations will be verified against the known perturbative expansion. We will update the relevant sections to reference this comparison. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Negative geometries premise from prior literature; explicit 3-loop enumeration and resummations remain independent

full rationale

The abstract states the reproduction property for negative geometries as established ('the integrand is reproduced in a similar way using negative geometries'), which is presumably justified by earlier Amplituhedron-related papers. However, the paper's load-bearing new content consists of an explicit enumeration of all three-loop negative geometries, the observed link between internal cycles and polylog depth, the separation into odd/even zeta contributions with suppression of higher cycles, the z-integration yielding Γ_cusp, and the all-loop resummation of convergent one-cycle series. These steps are presented as direct computations from the geometric construction rather than algebraic identities forced by the premise or by self-cited equations. The text also references independent weak-coupling Wilson-loop results up to three loops as external benchmarks. No quoted equation reduces a 'prediction' to a fitted input by construction, and no self-citation chain is shown to be the sole justification for the central claims. This qualifies as at most one minor self-citation that is not load-bearing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies insufficient detail to enumerate specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central construction relies on the pre-existing Amplituhedron inequalities and the identification of negative geometries with the logarithm integrand.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5847 in / 1259 out tokens · 46277 ms · 2026-06-29T10:49:47.862601+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 127 canonical work pages · 76 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower,One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 217–260, [hep-ph/9403226]

  2. [2]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar and D. A. Kosower,Fusing gauge theory tree amplitudes into loop amplitudes,Nucl. Phys. B435(1995) 59–101, [hep-ph/9409265]

  3. [3]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon and V. A. Smirnov,Iteration of planar amplitudes in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at three loops and beyond,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 085001, [hep-th/0505205]

  4. [4]

    Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, L. J. Dixon, H. Johansson and R. Roiban,The Ultraviolet Behavior of N=8 Supergravity at Four Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.103(2009) 081301, [0905.2326]

  5. [5]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. A. Kosower, R. Roiban, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu and A. Volovich, The Two-Loop Six-Gluon MHV Amplitude in Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 045007, [0803.1465]

  6. [6]

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, H. Johansson and R. Roiban,The Five-Loop Four-Point Amplitude of N=4 super-Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 241602, [1207.6666]. – 68 –

  7. [7]

    J. J. M. Carrasco, A. Edison and H. Johansson,Maximal Super-Yang-Mills at Six Loops via Novel Integrand Bootstrap,2112.05178

  8. [8]

    J. L. Bourjaily, E. Herrmann and J. Trnka,Prescriptive Unitarity,JHEP06(2017) 059, [1704.05460]

  9. [9]

    L. F. Alday and J. M. Maldacena,Gluon scattering amplitudes at strong coupling,JHEP06 (2007) 064, [0705.0303]

  10. [10]

    J. M. Drummond, G. P. Korchemsky and E. Sokatchev,Conformal properties of four-gluon planar amplitudes and Wilson loops,Nucl. Phys. B795(2008) 385–408, [0707.0243]

  11. [11]

    MHV Amplitudes in N=4 Super Yang-Mills and Wilson Loops

    A. Brandhuber, P. Heslop and G. Travaglini,MHV amplitudes in N=4 super Yang-Mills and Wilson loops,Nucl. Phys. B794(2008) 231–243, [0707.1153]

  12. [12]

    J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky and E. Sokatchev,On planar gluon amplitudes/Wilson loops duality,Nucl. Phys. B795(2008) 52–68, [0709.2368]

  13. [13]

    Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo and J. Trnka,Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes,JHEP06(2012) 125, [1012.6032]

  14. [14]

    The All-Loop Integrand For Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N=4 SYM

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, S. Caron-Huot and J. Trnka,The All-Loop Integrand For Scattering Amplitudes in Planar N=4 SYM,JHEP01(2011) 041, [1008.2958]

  15. [15]

    A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu and A. Volovich,Classical Polylogarithms for Amplitudes and Wilson Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 151605, [1006.5703]

  16. [16]

    Motivic Amplitudes and Cluster Coordinates

    J. Golden, A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu and A. Volovich,Motivic Amplitudes and Cluster Coordinates,JHEP01(2014) 091, [1305.1617]

  17. [17]

    Cluster Polylogarithms for Scattering Amplitudes

    J. Golden, M. F. Paulos, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich,Cluster Polylogarithms for Scattering Amplitudes,J. Phys. A47(2014) 474005, [1401.6446]

  18. [18]

    L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, C. Duhr, M. von Hippel and J. Pennington,Bootstrapping six-gluon scattering in planar N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory,PoSLL2014(2014) 077, [1407.4724]

  19. [19]

    L. J. Dixon and M. von Hippel,Bootstrapping an NMHV amplitude through three loops, JHEP10(2014) 065, [1408.1505]

  20. [20]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, F. Dulat, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod and G. Papathanasiou, Six-Gluon amplitudes in planarN= 4 super-Yang-Mills theory at six and seven loops, JHEP08(2019) 016, [1903.10890]

  21. [21]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, F. Dulat, M. Von Hippel, A. J. McLeod and G. Papathanasiou, The Cosmic Galois Group and Extended Steinmann Relations for PlanarN“4SYM Amplitudes,JHEP09(2019) 061, [1906.07116]

  22. [22]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, F. Dulat, J. Foster, ¨O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod and G. Papathanasiou,The Steinmann Cluster Bootstrap forN= 4 Super Yang-Mills Amplitudes,PoSCORFU2019(2020) 003, [2005.06735]

  23. [23]

    Basso, L

    B. Basso, L. J. Dixon and G. Papathanasiou,Origin of the Six-Gluon Amplitude in Planar N“4Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 161603, [2001.05460]

  24. [24]

    A Duality For The S Matrix

    N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo, C. Cheung and J. Kaplan,A Duality For The S Matrix, JHEP03(2010) 020, [0907.5418]. – 69 –

  25. [25]

    The Grassmannian Origin Of Dual Superconformal Invariance

    N. Arkani-Hamed, F. Cachazo and C. Cheung,The Grassmannian Origin Of Dual Superconformal Invariance,JHEP03(2010) 036, [0909.0483]

  26. [26]

    Unification of Residues and Grassmannian Dualities

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo and J. Trnka,Unification of Residues and Grassmannian Dualities,JHEP01(2011) 049, [0912.4912]

  27. [27]

    Local Spacetime Physics from the Grassmannian

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo and J. Trnka,Local Spacetime Physics from the Grassmannian,JHEP01(2011) 108, [0912.3249]

  28. [28]

    L. J. Mason and D. Skinner,Dual Superconformal Invariance, Momentum Twistors and Grassmannians,JHEP11(2009) 045, [0909.0250]

  29. [30]

    Gravity On-shell Diagrams

    E. Herrmann and J. Trnka,Gravity On-shell Diagrams,JHEP11(2016) 136, [1604.03479]

  30. [31]

    J. L. Bourjaily, S. Franco, D. Galloni and C. Wen,Stratifying On-Shell Cluster Varieties: the Geometry of Non-Planar On-Shell Diagrams,JHEP10(2016) 003, [1607.01781]

  31. [32]

    Paranjape, J

    S. Paranjape, J. Trnka and M. Zheng,Non-planar BCFW Grassmannian geometries,JHEP 12(2022) 084, [2208.02262]

  32. [33]

    Lisitsyn, U

    A. Lisitsyn, U. Oktem, M. Sherman-Bennett and J. Trnka,Grassmannian Geometries for Non-Planar On-Shell Diagrams,2512.25005

  33. [34]

    The Amplituhedron

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka,The Amplituhedron,JHEP10(2014) 030, [1312.2007]

  34. [35]

    Into the Amplituhedron

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka,Into the Amplituhedron,JHEP12(2014) 182, [1312.7878]

  35. [36]

    Unwinding the Amplituhedron in Binary

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Thomas and J. Trnka,Unwinding the Amplituhedron in Binary, JHEP01(2018) 016, [1704.05069]

  36. [37]

    Damgaard, L

    D. Damgaard, L. Ferro, T. Lukowski and M. Parisi,The Momentum Amplituhedron,JHEP 08(2019) 042, [1905.04216]

  37. [38]

    Ferro and T

    L. Ferro and T. Lukowski,The Loop Momentum Amplituhedron,JHEP05(2023) 183, [2210.01127]

  38. [39]

    He, Y.-t

    S. He, Y.-t. Huang and C.-K. Kuo,The ABJM Amplituhedron,JHEP09(2023) 165, [2306.00951]

  39. [40]

    Arkani-Hamed, W

    N. Arkani-Hamed, W. Flieger, J. M. Henn, A. Schreiber and J. Trnka,Coulomb Branch Amplitudes from a Deformed Amplituhedron Geometry,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 211601, [2311.10814]

  40. [41]

    Anatomy of the Amplituhedron

    S. Franco, D. Galloni, A. Mariotti and J. Trnka,Anatomy of the Amplituhedron,JHEP03 (2015) 128, [1408.3410]

  41. [42]

    Positive Amplitudes In The Amplituhedron

    N. Arkani-Hamed, A. Hodges and J. Trnka,Positive Amplitudes In The Amplituhedron, JHEP08(2015) 030, [1412.8478]

  42. [43]

    Towards the Amplituhedron Volume

    L. Ferro, T. Lukowski, A. Orta and M. Parisi,Towards the Amplituhedron Volume,JHEP 03(2016) 014, [1512.04954]

  43. [44]

    Landau Singularities from the Amplituhedron

    T. Dennen, I. Prlina, M. Spradlin, S. Stanojevic and A. Volovich,Landau Singularities from the Amplituhedron,JHEP06(2017) 152, [1612.02708]

  44. [45]

    Yangian Symmetry for the Tree Amplituhedron

    L. Ferro, T. Lukowski, A. Orta and M. Parisi,Yangian symmetry for the tree amplituhedron,J. Phys. A50(2017) 294005, [1612.04378]. – 70 –

  45. [46]

    Cutting Deep Into The Amplituhedron

    N. Arkani-Hamed, C. Langer, A. Yelleshpur Srikant and J. Trnka,Deep Into the Amplituhedron: Amplitude Singularities at All Loops and Legs,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 051601, [1810.08208]

  46. [47]

    Herrmann, C

    E. Herrmann, C. Langer, J. Trnka and M. Zheng,Positive geometry, local triangulations, and the dual of the Amplituhedron,JHEP01(2021) 035, [2009.05607]

  47. [48]

    G. Dian, P. Heslop and A. Stewart,Internal boundaries of the loop amplituhedron,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 098, [2207.12464]

  48. [49]

    S. N. Karp and L. K. Williams,The m=1 amplituhedron and cyclic hyperplane arrangements,Int. Math. Res. Not.5(2019) 1401–1462, [1608.08288]

  49. [50]

    S. N. Karp, L. K. Williams and Y. X. Zhang,Decompositions of amplituhedra,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare D Comb. Phys. Interact.7(2020) 303–363, [1708.09525]

  50. [51]

    Galashin and T

    P. Galashin and T. Lam,Parity duality for the amplituhedron,Compos. Math.156(2020) 2207–2262, [1805.00600]

  51. [52]

    Lukowski, M

    T. Lukowski, M. Parisi and L. K. Williams,The Positive Tropical Grassmannian, the Hypersimplex, and the m = 2 Amplituhedron,Int. Math. Res. Not.2023(2023) 16778–16836, [2002.06164]

  52. [53]

    Parisi, M

    M. Parisi, M. Sherman-Bennett and L. Williams,The m=2 amplituhedron and the hypersimplex: Signs, clusters, tilings, Eulerian numbers,Commun. Am. Math. Soc.3 (2023) 329–399, [2104.08254]

  53. [54]

    Parisi, M

    M. Parisi, M. Sherman-Bennett, R. Tessler and L. Williams,The Magic Number Conjecture for them“2amplituhedron and Parke-Taylor identities,2404.03026

  54. [55]

    Lam,On the face stratification of them“2amplituhedron,2403.06948

    T. Lam,On the face stratification of them“2amplituhedron,2403.06948

  55. [56]

    Akhmedova and R

    E. Akhmedova and R. J. Tessler,The Tropical Amplituhedron,2312.12319

  56. [57]

    Even-Zohar, T

    C. Even-Zohar, T. Lakrec, M. Parisi, M. Sherman-Bennett, R. Tessler and L. Williams, BCFW tilings and cluster adjacency for the amplituhedron,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.122 (2025) e2408572122, [2504.01217]

  57. [58]

    Ranestad, R

    K. Ranestad, R. Sinn and S. Telen,Adjoints and Canonical Forms of Tree Amplituhedra, Math. Scand.130(2024) 433–466, [2402.06527]

  58. [59]

    Mazzucchelli and E

    E. Mazzucchelli and E. Pratt,Exterior Cyclic Polytopes and Convexity of Amplituhedra, 2507.17620

  59. [60]

    Even-Zohar, T

    C. Even-Zohar, T. Lakrec and R. J. Tessler,The amplituhedron BCFW triangulation, Invent. Math.239(2025) 1009–1138, [2112.02703]

  60. [61]

    Even-Zohar, T

    C. Even-Zohar, T. Lakrec, M. Parisi, R. Tessler, M. Sherman-Bennett and L. Williams, Cluster algebras and tilings for the m=4 amplituhedron,2310.17727

  61. [62]

    Even-Zohar, T

    C. Even-Zohar, T. Lakrec, M. Parisi, M. Sherman-Bennett, R. Tessler and L. Williams,A cluster of results on amplituhedron tiles,Lett. Math. Phys.114(2024) 111, [2402.15568]

  62. [63]

    Amplituhedra and origami, I: tree level

    P. Galashin,Amplituhedra and origami,2410.09574

  63. [64]

    L. F. Alday, J. M. Henn, J. Plefka and T. Schuster,Scattering into the fifth dimension of N=4 super Yang-Mills,JHEP01(2010) 077, [0908.0684]

  64. [65]

    J. M. Henn, S. G. Naculich, H. J. Schnitzer and M. Spradlin,Higgs-regularized three-loop – 71 – four-gluon amplitude in N=4 SYM: exponentiation and Regge limits,JHEP04(2010) 038, [1001.1358]

  65. [66]

    J. M. Henn, S. G. Naculich, H. J. Schnitzer and M. Spradlin,More loops and legs in Higgs-regulated N=4 SYM amplitudes,JHEP08(2010) 002, [1004.5381]

  66. [67]

    J. L. Bourjaily, F. Dulat and E. Panzer,Manifestly Dual-Conformal Loop Integration,Nucl. Phys. B942(2019) 251–302, [1901.02887]

  67. [68]

    L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond and J. M. Henn,Bootstrapping the three-loop hexagon,JHEP 11(2011) 023, [1108.4461]

  68. [69]

    L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond and J. M. Henn,Analytic result for the two-loop six-point NMHV amplitude in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory,JHEP01(2012) 024, [1111.1704]

  69. [70]

    J. M. Drummond, G. Papathanasiou and M. Spradlin,A Symbol of Uniqueness: The Cluster Bootstrap for the 3-Loop MHV Heptagon,JHEP03(2015) 072, [1412.3763]

  70. [71]

    L. J. Dixon, M. von Hippel and A. J. McLeod,The four-loop six-gluon NMHV ratio function,JHEP01(2016) 053, [1509.08127]

  71. [72]

    Bootstrapping a Five-Loop Amplitude Using Steinmann Relations

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, A. McLeod and M. von Hippel,Bootstrapping a Five-Loop Amplitude Using Steinmann Relations,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 241601, [1609.00669]

  72. [73]

    L. J. Dixon, J. Drummond, T. Harrington, A. J. McLeod, G. Papathanasiou and M. Spradlin,Heptagons from the Steinmann Cluster Bootstrap,JHEP02(2017) 137, [1612.08976]

  73. [74]

    Drummond, J

    J. Drummond, J. Foster, ¨O. G¨ urdo˘ gan and G. Papathanasiou,Cluster adjacency and the four-loop NMHV heptagon,JHEP03(2019) 087, [1812.04640]

  74. [75]

    S. He, X. Jiang, X. Li and J. Liu,Heptagon Symbols at Five Loops and All-Loop Sequences, 2511.09669

  75. [76]

    Transcendentality and Crossing

    N. Beisert, B. Eden and M. Staudacher,Transcendentality and Crossing,J. Stat. Mech. 0701(2007) P01021, [hep-th/0610251]

  76. [77]

    L. F. Alday, J. M. Henn and J. Sikorowski,Higher loop mixed correlators in N=4 SYM, JHEP03(2013) 058, [1301.0149]

  77. [78]

    J. M. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky and B. Mistlberger,The full four-loop cusp anomalous dimension inN“4super Yang-Mills and QCD,JHEP04(2020) 018, [1911.10174]

  78. [79]

    Hexagonal Wilson Loops in Planar $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM Theory at Finite Coupling

    B. Basso, A. Sever and P. Vieira,Hexagonal Wilson loops in planarN“4SYM theory at finite coupling,J. Phys. A49(2016) 41LT01, [1508.03045]

  79. [80]

    OPE for all Helicity Amplitudes

    B. Basso, J. Caetano, L. Cordova, A. Sever and P. Vieira,OPE for all Helicity Amplitudes, JHEP08(2015) 018, [1412.1132]

  80. [81]

    Space-time S-matrix and Flux-tube S-matrix at Finite Coupling

    B. Basso, A. Sever and P. Vieira,Spacetime and Flux Tube S-Matrices at Finite Coupling for N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 091602, [1303.1396]

Showing first 80 references.