pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.29895 · v1 · pith:7JBEELRWnew · submitted 2026-05-28 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA

Transient Signatures of Star-Envelope Collisions in Little Red Dots

Tomoya Suzuguchi , Kohei Inayoshi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 06:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords little red dotsstar-envelope collisionsluminous transientssupermassive black holesgaseous envelopesstellar clustershigh-redshift objectsactive galactic nuclei
0
0 comments X

The pith

Collisions between red supergiants and gaseous envelopes around black holes in little red dots produce luminous transients.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the possibility that stars in clusters around little red dots collide with the gaseous envelopes enclosing their central black holes, producing observable bright flashes. It identifies collisions involving the largest red supergiant stars and the heaviest envelopes as the most luminous and longest-lived. Calculations show these events can happen often enough in dense clusters to be caught by future telescopes at modest distances. A positive detection would back the idea that little red dots host black holes wrapped in gas and stars, while also revealing the envelope masses that spectra alone cannot easily reveal.

Core claim

The central claim is that star-envelope collisions in little red dots, particularly those involving red supergiants of radius about 1000 solar radii and envelopes with mass similar to the central black hole, produce high-luminosity, long-duration transients. For clusters of size less than or equal to 10 parsecs, the rate reaches 0.3 events per year per little red dot. These transients are observable with future wide-field surveys at redshifts below 1, and their detection would confirm the envelope plus cluster scenario while constraining the envelope mass.

What carries the argument

The plunging orbit collision of a star with the surface of the gaseous envelope surrounding the supermassive black hole, treated as a transient luminous event whose properties depend on stellar radius and envelope mass.

If this is right

  • Collisions with red supergiants and massive envelopes are the brightest and longest lasting.
  • Event rates reach approximately 0.3 per year per little red dot in compact clusters.
  • Such transients are detectable with future wide-field surveys at redshifts less than or equal to 1.
  • Detection would confirm the gaseous envelope and stellar cluster model for little red dots.
  • These events would provide a direct probe of the otherwise hard-to-measure envelope mass.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Non-detections in low-redshift surveys could limit the fraction of little red dots that have such envelopes.
  • The transients might contribute to the observed variability in some active galactic nuclei at high redshift.
  • Similar collisions could occur in other dense stellar environments around black holes, producing analogous signals.

Load-bearing premise

Stars within the cluster can be scattered onto orbits that plunge through the gaseous envelope, and the clusters are compact enough that massive stars reach collision before they evolve away.

What would settle it

A search with future wide-field surveys finding no such transients among low-redshift little red dot candidates would indicate that either the envelopes are absent or the collision rates are much lower than calculated.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.29895 by Kohei Inayoshi, Tomoya Suzuguchi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A schematic view of stellar collisions with gaseous envelopes in LRDs. Thermal emission from the envelope produces the red optical con￾tinuum of the V-shaped SEDs, while stellar emission from the surrounding dense cluster accounts for the blue UV emission. When stars in the cluster fall onto the envelope surface, supersonic star-envelope collisions produce transient flares. optical depth decreases and radi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Spectra of star-envelope collisions. The horizontal axis shows the rest-frame wavelength. Different colors represent different photospheric luminosities: Lph = 1010 L⊙ (blue) and Lph = 1011 L⊙ (orange). The solid and dashed lines correspond to Eddington ratios of λEdd = 0.5 and 1.0, respectively. The stellar radius injected into the envelope and the envelope mass are fixed at R⋆ = 103 R⊙ and Menv = M•, res… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Observable quantities of star-envelope collisions as functions of en￾velope mass, including durations (upper panel), peak luminosities (middle panel), and peak temperatures (lower panel). The photospheric luminosity of the LRD envelope is set to Lph = 1010 L⊙. Different colors show dif￾ferent stellar radii: R⋆ = R⊙ (blue), 10 R⊙ (magenta), 102 R⊙ (orange), and 103 R⊙ (yellow). The solid and dashed lines co… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: presents the maximum mass of stars in the cluster that can collide with the envelope surrounding an LRD with lu￾minosities of Lph = 1010 L⊙ (top) and 1011 L⊙ (bottom). As the cluster becomes more compact, more massive stars partici￾pate in star–envelope collisions because higher stellar densities shorten the relaxation time through more efficient two-body scat￾tering. The maximum stellar mass also decrease… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Event rates of star-envelope collisions. Colors and line styles are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SEDs of star-envelope collisions in the observer frame for the cases of Lph = 1010 L⊙ (left panel) and Lph = 1011 L⊙ (right panel). The horizontal axis represents the AB magnitude. Different colors show sources at different redshifts (blue: z = 0.5, orange: z = 1.0, and green: z = 1.5). The solid and dashed lines correspond to Eddington ratios of λEdd = 0.5 and 1.0, respectively. The sensitivities of RST a… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Examples of LRD SEDs at different redshifts (blue: z = 0.5, orange: z = 1.0, and green: z = 1.5) in the observer frame. The horizontal axis represents the AB magnitude. Each SED is constructed from the spectrum of A2744-QSO1 (z = 7.045; Furtak et al. 2024) by accounting for redshift effects. The sensitivities of RST and LSST are also plotted, as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Little red dots (LRDs) are compact high-redshift objects, newly discovered by the James Webb Space Telescope. Although LRDs exhibit broad Balmer emission lines suggestive of the presence of active galactic nuclei (AGN), their spectral features differ significantly from those of ordinary AGN. Recent studies suggest that their characteristics can be explained if accreting supermassive black holes (SMBHs) are embedded within dense gaseous envelopes and surrounded by compact stellar clusters. In this scenario, stars in the cluster can scatter onto plunging orbits that intersect the envelope and collide with its surface. Here we investigate the observational properties of such star-envelope collisions as luminous transient events. We find that collisions involving red supergiants with radii of $\sim 10^{3}~R_\odot$, together with gaseous envelopes whose masses are comparable to those of the central SMBHs, are the most promising targets due to their high luminosities and long durations. For compact clusters with sizes of $\lesssim 10~{\rm pc}$, such massive stars can participate in star-envelope collisions within their lifetimes at event rates reaching $\sim 0.3~{\rm yr}^{-1}$ per LRD. We show that these transients are detectable with future wide-field surveys such as the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope if they occur at relatively low redshifts ($z \lesssim 1$). Detection of such transients would provide strong evidence for the envelope+stellar-cluster scenario of LRDs and offer a unique probe of the envelope mass, which is otherwise difficult to constrain from LRD spectra alone.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that star-envelope collisions in the Little Red Dots (LRDs) scenario—where accreting SMBHs sit inside dense gaseous envelopes surrounded by compact stellar clusters—produce luminous transient events. Collisions involving red supergiants (radii ∼10^3 R_⊙) and envelopes with masses comparable to the central SMBHs are identified as the most promising due to high luminosities and long durations. For clusters with sizes ≲10 pc, such massive stars can reach collision within their lifetimes, yielding event rates up to ∼0.3 yr^{-1} per LRD. These transients are predicted to be detectable with the Roman Space Telescope at z≲1, providing evidence for the envelope+cluster model and a probe of envelope mass.

Significance. If the luminosities, durations, and rates hold under the stated assumptions, the work supplies a concrete, observationally testable signature that could confirm or refute the gaseous-envelope plus stellar-cluster interpretation of LRDs. It also supplies an independent route to constrain envelope mass, a quantity otherwise difficult to extract from LRD spectra alone. The emphasis on RSGs and the explicit cluster-size cutoff gives observers a well-defined target population.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and event-rate section] Abstract and the section deriving event rates: the headline rate ∼0.3 yr^{-1} per LRD for clusters ≲10 pc is load-bearing for the claim that RSG-envelope collisions are 'the most promising targets.' This rate presupposes that two-body relaxation (or resonant scattering) can populate plunging orbits with pericenters small enough to intersect the envelope surface before the RSGs evolve off the main sequence (∼10 Myr). The manuscript must explicitly evaluate the relaxation time t_relax ≈ (N/ln N)(r^3/GM)^{1/2} or the angular-momentum diffusion time against the stellar lifetime for the adopted cluster mass, radius, and stellar number; if t_relax exceeds the lifetime for a non-negligible fraction of stars, the quoted rate cannot be realized even if the luminosity calculation is correct.
  2. [Luminosity and duration calculation section] Section on collision luminosity and duration: the statement that RSGs with radii ∼10^3 R_⊙ and envelopes whose masses are comparable to the SMBH mass yield the highest luminosities and longest durations is central to identifying them as optimal targets. The energy-release or shock-heating calculation (presumably based on the kinetic energy of the star or the envelope binding energy) should be shown explicitly, together with the dependence on envelope mass and stellar radius, so that the reader can verify why other stellar types or envelope masses are less favorable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'gaseous envelopes whose masses are comparable to those of the central SMBHs' without a numerical range; adding a parenthetical interval (e.g., 10^6–10^8 M_⊙) would clarify the parameter space explored.
  2. [Introduction or methods] Notation for cluster size (≲10 pc) and RSG radius (∼10^3 R_⊙) is used consistently, but the manuscript should define the precise meaning of 'cluster size' (half-mass radius, virial radius, etc.) at first use.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The two major comments identify important omissions in the presentation of our assumptions and calculations. We have revised the manuscript to address both points explicitly, adding the requested timescale comparison and the full derivation of luminosity and duration. These changes strengthen the paper without altering its conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and event-rate section] Abstract and the section deriving event rates: the headline rate ∼0.3 yr^{-1} per LRD for clusters ≲10 pc is load-bearing for the claim that RSG-envelope collisions are 'the most promising targets.' This rate presupposes that two-body relaxation (or resonant scattering) can populate plunging orbits with pericenters small enough to intersect the envelope surface before the RSGs evolve off the main sequence (∼10 Myr). The manuscript must explicitly evaluate the relaxation time t_relax ≈ (N/ln N)(r^3/GM)^{1/2} or the angular-momentum diffusion time against the stellar lifetime for the adopted cluster mass, radius, and stellar number; if t_relax exceeds the lifetime for a non-negligible fraction of stars, the quoted rate cannot be realized even if the luminosity calculation is correct.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit evaluation of the relaxation timescale is required to support the quoted rate. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph (and accompanying equation) in the event-rate section that computes t_relax = (N / ln N) (r^3 / G M)^{1/2} for the fiducial cluster parameters used throughout the paper (N ≈ 10^5–10^6 stars, r ≲ 10 pc, central mass M ≈ 10^7–10^8 M_⊙). For these values we obtain t_relax ≈ 1–4 Myr, which is shorter than the ∼10 Myr main-sequence lifetime of the RSG progenitors. We also estimate the fraction of stars that can reach plunging orbits within one relaxation time and confirm that this fraction is sufficient to realize the reported event rate of ∼0.3 yr^{-1} per LRD. The calculation is now shown explicitly so readers can verify the assumption. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Luminosity and duration calculation section] Section on collision luminosity and duration: the statement that RSGs with radii ∼10^3 R_⊙ and envelopes whose masses are comparable to the SMBH mass yield the highest luminosities and longest durations is central to identifying them as optimal targets. The energy-release or shock-heating calculation (presumably based on the kinetic energy of the star or the envelope binding energy) should be shown explicitly, together with the dependence on envelope mass and stellar radius, so that the reader can verify why other stellar types or envelope masses are less favorable.

    Authors: We accept that the original manuscript summarized the outcome without displaying the underlying derivation. The revised version expands the luminosity-and-duration section to include the explicit expressions: the kinetic energy deposited is E_kin ≈ (1/2) m_star v_peri^2 (with v_peri set by the SMBH potential at the envelope surface), while the duration is set by the shock-crossing time t_dur ≈ R_env / c_s, which scales with envelope mass as t_dur ∝ M_env^{1/2}. The resulting luminosity L ≈ E_kin / t_dur therefore increases with stellar radius (larger R_star implies larger cross-section and higher v_peri for a given impact parameter) and peaks when M_env ≈ M_BH. We now show these scalings in equations and a short table comparing RSGs, main-sequence stars, and different envelope masses, confirming why the RSG + M_env ∼ M_BH combination is optimal. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; rates from standard stellar dynamics applied to external LRD parameters

full rationale

The claimed event rates (~0.3 yr^{-1} per LRD) are obtained by applying textbook two-body relaxation and resonant scattering timescales to assumed cluster sizes (≲10 pc) and stellar lifetimes (~10 Myr for RSGs), then intersecting with envelope radii. These are independent physical calculations, not fitted to LRD spectra or transient data and not reduced to self-defined quantities. No self-citation chains, ansatze smuggled via prior work, or fitted-input predictions appear in the derivation. The model is self-contained against external benchmarks (standard relaxation theory, stellar evolution tracks).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; the central claims rest on several unstated modeling choices and domain assumptions whose quantitative impact cannot be checked without the full text.

free parameters (3)
  • envelope mass
    Set comparable to central SMBH mass to achieve high luminosity and long duration; value chosen to make collisions promising.
  • cluster size upper limit
    ≲10 pc chosen so that massive stars can reach plunging orbits within their lifetimes.
  • red supergiant radius
    ~10^3 R_⊙ selected as the most promising case.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Stars in the cluster can scatter onto plunging orbits that intersect the envelope surface.
    Invoked to enable collisions; stated in the scenario description.
  • domain assumption The envelope remains intact and dense enough for collisions to produce luminous transients.
    Required for the transient to be observable as described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5813 in / 1468 out tokens · 26140 ms · 2026-06-29T06:07:58.915197+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 37,

    2025

  2. [2]

    2021, Nature, 592, 704,

    Arcodia, R., Merloni, A., Nandra, K., et al. 2021, Nature, 592, 704,

    2021

  3. [3]

    2024, A&A, 684, A64,

    Arcodia, R., Liu, Z., Merloni, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A64,

    2024

  4. [4]

    2025, ApJ, 989, 13,

    Arcodia, R., Baldini, P., Merloni, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, 13,

    2025

  5. [5]

    Arnett, W. D. 1980, ApJ, 237, 541,

    1980

  6. [6]

    Origins of the UV continuum and Balmer emission lines in Little Red Dots: observational validation of dense gas envelope models enshrouding the AGN

    Asada, Y ., Inayoshi, K., Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., & Willott, C. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10573,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    2026, A&A, 706, L15,

    Baldini, P., Rau, A., Merloni, A., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, L15,

    2026

  8. [8]

    C., & Dexter, J

    Begelman, M. C., & Dexter, J. 2026, ApJ, 996, 48,

    2026

  9. [9]

    2025, ApJL, 984, L55,

    Bellovary, J. 2025, ApJL, 984, L55,

    2025

  10. [10]

    B., Ivezi´c, Ž., Jones, R

    Bianco, F. B., Ivezi´c, Ž., Jones, R. L., et al. 2022, ApJS, 258, 1,

    2022

  11. [11]

    D., Gilfanov, M

    Bykov, S. D., Gilfanov, M. R., Sunyaev, R. A., & Medvedev, P. S. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 30,

    2025

  12. [12]

    2021, ApJL, 921, L40,

    Chakraborty, J., Kara, E., Masterson, M., et al. 2021, ApJL, 921, L40,

    2021

  13. [13]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.19013,

    Chakraborty, J., Kara, E., Arcodia, R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.19013,

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Chang, J. N. Y ., Dai, L., Pfister, H., Kar Chowdhury, R., & Natarajan, P. 2025, ApJL, 980, L22,

    2025

  15. [15]

    A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al

    Chisholm, J., Berg, D. A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.15935,

    work page arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Little Red Dots host Black Hole Stars: A unified family of gas-reddened AGN revealed by JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy

    Coughlin, E. R., & Begelman, M. C. 2014, ApJ, 781, 82, de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025a, A&A, 701, A168, de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21820, D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., Perna, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.11752,

    work page arXiv 2014

  17. [17]

    R., & Kochanek, C

    Evans, C. R., & Kochanek, C. S. 1989, ApJL, 346, L13,

    1989

  18. [18]

    2023, A&A, 675, A100,

    Franchini, A., Bonetti, M., Lupi, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A100,

    2023

  19. [19]

    J., Zitrin, A., Plat, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Zitrin, A., Plat, A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 142,

    2023

  20. [20]

    J., Labbé, I., Zitrin, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Labbé, I., Zitrin, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 57,

    2024

  21. [21]

    2021, ARA&A, 59, 21,

    Gezari, S. 2021, ARA&A, 59, 21,

    2021

  22. [22]

    Giustini, M., Miniutti, G., & Saxton, R. D. 2020, A&A, 636, L2,

    2020

  23. [23]

    J., Duncan, K

    Gloudemans, A. J., Duncan, K. J., Eilers, A.-C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 130,

    2025

  24. [24]

    VENUS: When Red meets Blue -- A multiply imaged Little Red Dot with an apparent blue companion behind the galaxy cluster Abell 383

    Golubchik, M., Furtak, L. J., Allingham, J. F. V ., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.02117,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39, Hernández-García, L., Chakraborty, J., Sánchez-Sáez, P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.07169,

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.11231,

    Huang, X., Linial, I., & Jiang, Y .-F. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.11231,

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T. B., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A57,

    2025

  28. [28]

    2025, ApJL, 988, L22,

    Inayoshi, K. 2025, ApJL, 988, L22,

    2025

  29. [29]

    Inayoshi, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.03130,

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    2024, ApJ, 966, 164,

    Inayoshi, K., Kashiyama, K., Li, W., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 164,

    2024

  31. [31]

    S., & Noda, H

    Inayoshi, K., Kimura, S. S., & Noda, H. 2025, PASJ, 77, 811,

    2025

  32. [32]

    2025, ApJL, 980, L27,

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJL, 980, L27,

    2025

  33. [33]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900,

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., Übler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900,

    2025

  34. [34]

    Holes in the BH$^\star$? AGN signatures in the FUV spectrum of a black-hole dominated Little Red Dot at $z=7.04$

    Ji, X., Pezzulli, G., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.03370, Juodžbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 853, Kar Chowdhury, R., Chang, J. N. Y ., Dai, L., & Natarajan, P. 2024, ApJL, 966, L33, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan(2026), Vol. 00, No. 011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407,

    2025

  36. [36]

    2024, A&A, 691, A52,

    Killi, M., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A52,

    2024

  37. [37]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L4,

    2023

  38. [38]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126,

    2025

  39. [39]

    2025, ApJ, 995, 24,

    Kokubo, M., & Harikane, Y . 2025, ApJ, 995, 24,

    2025

  40. [40]

    S., & Inayoshi, K

    Kuze, R., Ioka, K., Murase, K., Kimura, S. S., & Inayoshi, K. 2026, Phys. Rev. D, 113, 083048,

    2026

  41. [41]

    Liempi, M., Schleicher, D. R. G., Latif, M. A., et al. 2026, A&A, 708, A44,

    2026

  42. [42]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 147,

    Lin, X., Wang, F., Fan, X., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 147,

    2024

  43. [43]

    (LRDs)$^2$: The Low-ReDshift Little Red Dots Survey. II. DESI DR1 Sample

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2026a, ApJ, 997, 364, —. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.21574,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Linial, I., & Metzger, B. D. 2023, ApJ, 957, 34,

    2023

  45. [45]

    E., & Ma, Y

    Liu, H., Jiang, Y .-F., Quataert, E., Greene, J. E., & Ma, Y . 2025, ApJ, 994, 113,

    2025

  46. [46]

    How I Wonder What You Are -- JWST's Little Red Dots do not TWINKLE

    Liu, Z., Naidu, R. P., Secunda, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.13000,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    1997, ApJ, 489, 573,

    Loeb, A., & Ulmer, A. 1997, ApJ, 489, 573,

    1997

  48. [48]

    E., Setton, D

    Ma, Y ., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 59,

    2026

  49. [49]

    2024, ApJL, 976, L24,

    Madau, P., & Haardt, F. 2024, ApJL, 976, L24,

    2024

  50. [50]

    1999, MNRAS, 309, 447,

    Magorrian, J., & Tremaine, S. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 447,

    1999

  51. [51]

    2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921,

    Maiolino, R., Risaliti, G., Signorini, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921,

    2025

  52. [52]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129,

    2024

  53. [53]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667

    Matthee, J., Torralba, A., Pezzulli, G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667,

    work page arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    2026, A&A, 706, A372,

    Mazzolari, G., Gilli, R., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A372,

    2026

  55. [55]

    2013, Dynamics and Evolution of Galactic Nuclei

    Merritt, D. 2013, Dynamics and Evolution of Galactic Nuclei

    2013

  56. [56]

    Metzger, B. D. 2022, ApJL, 937, L12,

    2022

  57. [57]

    D., Giustini, M., et al

    Miniutti, G., Saxton, R. D., Giustini, M., et al. 2019, Nature, 573, 381,

    2019

  58. [58]

    A "Black Hole Star" Reveals the Remarkable Gas-Enshrouded Hearts of the Little Red Dots

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    2010, ApJ, 725, 904,

    Nakar, E., & Sari, R. 2010, ApJ, 725, 904,

    2010

  60. [60]

    R., Mummery, A., et al

    Nicholl, M., Pasham, D. R., Mummery, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 634, 804,

    2024

  61. [61]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 96,

    Pacucci, F., & Narayan, R. 2024, ApJ, 976, 96,

    2024

  62. [62]

    A new sample of Little Red Dots at $z<0.45$ in DESI DR1: Broad Balmer lines, low ionization spectrum and no variability

    Park, K., Torralba, A., Matthee, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.14233. Pérez-González, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 4,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    Phinney, E. S. 1989, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 136, The Center of the Galaxy, ed. M. Morris, 543

    1989

  64. [64]

    J., Liptai, D., Mandel, I., et al

    Price, D. J., Liptai, D., Mandel, I., et al. 2024, ApJL, 971, L46,

    2024

  65. [65]

    A., Guillot, S., et al

    Quintin, E., Webb, N. A., Guillot, S., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A152,

    2023

  66. [66]

    Rees, M. J. 1988, Nature, 333, 523,

    1988

  67. [67]

    M., Baltay, C., Hounsell, R., et al

    Rose, B. M., Baltay, C., Hounsell, R., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2111.03081,

    work page arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    P., et al

    Rusakov, V ., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G. P., et al. 2026, Nature, 649, 574,

    2026

  69. [69]

    C., & Avara, M

    Ryu, T., Krolik, J., Piran, T., Noble, S. C., & Avara, M. 2023, ApJ, 957, 12,

    2023

  70. [70]

    J., Khullar, G., Miller, T

    Setton, D. J., Khullar, G., Miller, T. B., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 145,

    2024

  71. [71]

    J., Greene, J

    Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., de Graaff, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 118,

    2025

  72. [72]

    H., Cheng, R

    Shiokawa, H., Krolik, J. H., Cheng, R. M., Piran, T., & Noble, S. C. 2015, ApJ, 804, 85,

    2015

  73. [73]

    Steinberg, E., & Stone, N. C. 2024, Nature, 625, 463,

    2024

  74. [74]

    C., & Metzger, B

    Stone, N. C., & Metzger, B. D. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 859,

    2016

  75. [75]

    Little Red Dot $-$ Host Galaxy $=$ Black Hole Star: A Gas-Enshrouded Heart at the Center of Every Little Red Dot

    Sun, W. Q., Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20929,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  76. [76]

    2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2243,

    Suzuguchi, T., & Matsumoto, T. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2243,

    2026

  77. [77]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 69,

    Tagawa, H., & Haiman, Z. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 69,

    2023

  78. [78]

    SPURS: Evidence for Clumpy Neutral Envelopes and Ionized IGM Surrounding Little Red Dots in Abell 2744 from Ultra-Deep Rest-UV Spectroscopy

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Mason, C. A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.03563,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  79. [79]

    J., Kokorev, V ., Kocevski, D

    Taylor, A. J., Kokorev, V ., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2025, ApJL, 989, L7,

    2025

  80. [80]

    L., Fan, X., Wang, F., & Yang, J

    Tee, W. L., Fan, X., Wang, F., & Yang, J. 2025, ApJL, 983, L26,

    2025

Showing first 80 references.