Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 83 references

Propagation of waves in weakly ionized two-fluid plasmas. II. Nonlinear Alfv\'enic waves

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Circularly polarized Alfvén waves generate non-oscillatory bulk flows without the density oscillations of linear polarization in weakly ionized plasmas.

desk verdict Polarization-dependent damping rates plus distinct nonlinear flow behavior in two-fluid Alfvén waves, but fixed collision rates may limit applicability once density varies. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.30057 v1 pith:V6Y7PP3L submitted 2026-05-28 physics.plasm-ph astro-ph.SR

David Martínez-Gómez This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phastro-ph.SR
keywords Alfvénwavesweaklyionizedplasmastwo-fluidmodelnonlinearponderomotiveforceion-neutralcollisionsHallcurrentdensityperturbations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the propagation of nonlinear Alfvénic waves using a two-fluid model that includes Hall current and elastic ion-neutral collisions. It derives analytical expressions for how damping and heating rates change with coupling strength and polarization. Numerical simulations reveal that circular polarization produces steady bulk flows and density perturbations without the oscillations seen in linear cases, while weak coupling lets energy dissipation drive the neutral fluid more than the ponderomotive force.

What carries the argument

Two-fluid plasma model with Hall current and elastic ion-neutral collisions, applied to derive damping rates and to simulate nonlinear wave evolution.

What would settle it

Detection of oscillatory density perturbations or longitudinal motions driven directly by the ponderomotive force on the neutral fluid in a weakly coupled regime would contradict the reported nonlinear behavior.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The nonlinear perturbations associated with the circularly polarized eigenmodes do not show the oscillatory motions typically caused by linearly polarized eigenmodes, but they retain the non-oscillatory bulk flows. In weak coupling conditions the nonlinear dynamics of the neutral fluid is mainly driven by the wave energy dissipation while the ponderomotive force only directly acts on the charged fluid.

Load-bearing premise

The two-fluid description with Hall current and elastic ion-neutral collisions remains valid for the density and flow perturbations generated by the nonlinear evolution of the waves.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Damping and heating rates depend on both collisional coupling strength and the polarization state of the wave.
  • Circular polarization produces different patterns of density perturbations and bulk flows than linear polarization.
  • In weak coupling the neutral fluid responds primarily to dissipated wave energy rather than direct ponderomotive forcing.
  • The separation of effects between charged and neutral components produces different amplitudes for longitudinal motions, density changes, and temperature perturbations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Polarization state could serve as a control parameter for the spatial structure of heating and flows in partially ionized regions.
  • The reported distinction between oscillatory and steady responses might be tested by comparing wave observations at different ionization fractions.
  • If the two-fluid assumption holds, similar polarization-dependent behavior should appear in other wave modes that involve transverse magnetic perturbations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a two-fluid model including the Hall term and elastic ion-neutral collisions to study propagation of linearly and circularly polarized transverse Alfvénic waves in weakly ionized plasmas. It derives analytical damping and heating rates that depend explicitly on collisional coupling strength and polarization state, then uses numerical simulations to examine nonlinear generation of density perturbations and bulk flows driven by the ponderomotive force and collisional dissipation. The central findings are that circularly polarized eigenmodes produce non-oscillatory bulk flows without the oscillatory motions seen for linear polarization, and that in weak coupling the neutral-fluid dynamics is driven primarily by wave-energy dissipation while the ponderomotive force acts directly only on the charged fluid.

Significance. If the derivations and simulations hold, the work supplies explicit, coupling-strength-dependent expressions for damping/heating and clarifies polarization-dependent nonlinear responses relevant to density and flow perturbations observed in the solar atmosphere and prominences. The analytical rates and the separation of ponderomotive versus dissipative driving in the weak-coupling limit constitute concrete, testable predictions that could be compared with observations or more detailed kinetic models.

major comments (2)
  1. [model setup and numerical section] The central claims about nonlinear bulk flows and the dominance of dissipation over ponderomotive forcing in the neutral fluid rest on the two-fluid equations (with fixed collision frequency and ionization fraction) remaining valid for the generated density and flow perturbations. The manuscript does not examine whether nonlinear density changes alter the mean free path or ionization balance, which would modify the collisional coupling and thereby the reported separation of forces and the amplitudes of longitudinal motions.
  2. [derivation of damping/heating rates] The analytical damping and heating rates are stated to depend on collisional coupling strength and polarization; however, the derivation steps that lead from the linearized two-fluid equations to the explicit rates are not cross-checked against the nonlinear simulation outputs for consistency in the weak-coupling regime.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the polarization states and the definition of the Hall parameter should be introduced once and used consistently between the analytic section and the simulation figures.
  2. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of how the present results extend or differ from Paper I.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of model validity and consistency between analysis and simulations. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [model setup and numerical section] The central claims about nonlinear bulk flows and the dominance of dissipation over ponderomotive forcing in the neutral fluid rest on the two-fluid equations (with fixed collision frequency and ionization fraction) remaining valid for the generated density and flow perturbations. The manuscript does not examine whether nonlinear density changes alter the mean free path or ionization balance, which would modify the collisional coupling and thereby the reported separation of forces and the amplitudes of longitudinal motions.

    Authors: We agree that the fixed collision frequency and ionization fraction constitute a modeling assumption whose validity depends on the amplitude of the generated perturbations. In the simulations presented, the relative density changes remain below ~5%, for which the mean-free-path variation and ionization-balance shift are expected to be negligible within the weakly ionized regime considered. Nevertheless, this is a genuine limitation for extrapolating to stronger nonlinearities. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit discussion paragraph in Section 4 (or a new subsection) stating the range of validity of the constant-coefficient approximation and noting that variable collision frequency would require a more elaborate model. This is a partial revision: we clarify the limitation without performing new variable-coefficient runs. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [derivation of damping/heating rates] The analytical damping and heating rates are stated to depend on collisional coupling strength and polarization; however, the derivation steps that lead from the linearized two-fluid equations to the explicit rates are not cross-checked against the nonlinear simulation outputs for consistency in the weak-coupling regime.

    Authors: The analytical rates follow directly from the linearized two-fluid system (Eqs. 8–12 and the subsequent dispersion relation). To demonstrate consistency, we will extract the time-averaged energy dissipation rate from the weak-coupling simulation runs and compare it quantitatively with the analytical heating rate evaluated at the same coupling strength and polarization. The comparison, together with a concise recap of the linear derivation steps, will be added as a new paragraph in Section 3.2 and illustrated in a supplementary figure. This constitutes a full revision of the requested cross-check. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: derivations start from standard two-fluid equations and yield explicit dependence on collisional parameters.

full rationale

The paper begins from the standard two-fluid plasma equations with Hall term and elastic ion-neutral collisions, derives analytical damping/heating rates as functions of coupling strength and polarization, and runs numerical simulations of nonlinear ponderomotive and dissipative effects. No fitted parameters are introduced and then relabeled as predictions, no self-citations form the load-bearing justification for uniqueness or ansatzes, and no results reduce by construction to quantities defined within the paper itself. The central findings (absence of oscillatory motions for circular polarization, dissipation-driven neutral dynamics in weak coupling) follow directly from the model equations without circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard two-fluid plasma equations plus the weak-ionization and Hall-current approximations; no new free parameters, ad-hoc entities, or non-standard axioms are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Two-fluid description with elastic ion-neutral collisions and Hall current is an adequate model for wave propagation in weakly ionized solar-atmosphere plasmas.
    Invoked to derive the damping/heating rates and to set up the nonlinear simulations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Propagation of waves in weakly ionized two-fluid plasmas. II. Nonlinear Alfv\'enic waves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V6Y7PP3L

@misc{pith2026260530057,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Propagation of waves in weakly ionized two-fluid plasmas. II. Nonlinear Alfv\'enic waves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V6Y7PP3L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.30057}
}
read the original abstract

Weakly ionized plasmas can be found in the lower layers of the solar and stellar atmospheres and in structures such as prominences and spicules. A variety of density perturbations and bulk flows detected in these environments have been explained as the result of the ponderomotive force generated by nonlinear Alfv\'enic waves. In addition, the dissipation of the energy carried by these waves leads to heating of the plasma. Here, we use a two-fluid model to study the combined influence of Hall's current and elastic collisions between ions and neutrals on the propagation of linearly and circularly polarized transverse waves in weakly ionized plasmas. We derive analytical expressions for the damping and heating rates, showing their dependence on the strength of the collisional coupling and on the polarization state. We also perform numerical simulations to investigate the nonlinear generation of density perturbations and bulk flows related to the ponderomotive force and the energy dissipation by the ion-neutral interaction. We find that the nonlinear perturbations associated with the circularly polarized eigenmodes do not show the oscillatory motions typically caused by linearly polarized eigenmodes, but they retain the non-oscillatory bulk flows. We also briefly discuss how in weak coupling conditions the nonlinear dynamics of the neutral fluid is mainly driven by the wave energy dissipation while the ponderomotive force only directly acts on the charged fluid, resulting in different amplitudes of the longitudinal motions and the perturbations of density and temperature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1993, Phys

    Amagishi, Y., & Tanaka, M. 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 71, 360, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.360

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.360 1993

  2. [2]

    D., Brady, C

    Arber, T. D., Brady, C. S., & Shelyag, S. 2016, ApJ, 817, 94, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/94 16

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/817/2/94 2016

  3. [3]

    Marginean, J

    Ballai, I. 2019, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 6, 39, doi: 10.3389/fspas.2019.00039

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00039 2019

  4. [4]

    2024, Philoso phical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 382, 20230226, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0226

    Ballai, I., Forg´ acs-Dajka, E., & McMurdo, M. 2024, Philoso phical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 382, 20230226, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0226

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2023.0226 2024

  5. [5]

    A&A , Year =

    Ballester, J. L., Soler, R., Terradas, J., & Carbonell, M. 20 20, A&A, 641, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038220 —. 2024, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 382, 20230222, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0222

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038220 2024

  6. [6]

    M., & Orszag, S

    Bender, C. M., & Orszag, S. A. 1978, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (McGraw-Hill, New Yor k)

    1978

  7. [7]

    Bittencourt, J. A. 2004, Fundamentals of Plasma Physics (Springer-Verlag)

    2004

  8. [8]

    Botha, G. J. J., Arber, T. D., Nakariakov, V. M., & Keenan, F. P. 2000, A&A, 363, 1186

    2000

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    S., & Arber, T

    Brady, C. S., & Arber, T. D. 2016, ApJ, 829, 80, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/80

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    Braginskii, S. I. 1965, Reviews of Plasma Physics, 1, 205

    1965

  3. [11]

    S., & G´ omez-M ´ ıguez, M

    Cally, P. S., & G´ omez-M ´ ıguez, M. M. 2023, ApJ, 946, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbb63

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Campos, L. M. B. C. 1992, Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics, 4, 2975, doi: 10.1063/1.860136

    1992 doi

  5. [13]

    Christopoulos, T., Tsilipakos, O., Sinatkas, G., & Kriezis , E. E. 2019, Optics Express, 27, 14505, doi: 10.1364/OE.27.014505

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    Cramer, N. F. 2001, The Physics of Alfv´ en W aves (Wiley-VCH) de Pontieu, B., & Haerendel, G. 1998, A&A, 338, 729

    2001

  7. [15]

    Draine, B. T. 1986, MNRAS, 220, 133, doi: 10.1093/mnras/220.1.133

    1986 doi

  8. [16]

    A., & Plumpton, C

    Ferraro, C. A., & Plumpton, C. 1958, ApJ, 127, 459, doi: 10.1086/146474

    1958 doi

  9. [17]

    Ferraro, V. C. A. 1954, ApJ, 119, 393, doi: 10.1086/145837 Gonz´ alez Manrique, S. J., Khomenko, E., Collados, M., et al . 2024, A&A, 681, A114, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348119 Gonz´ alez-Morales, P. A., Khomenko, E., Vitas, N., & Collad os, M. 2020, A&A, 642, A220, doi: 10.1...

    1954 doi

  10. [18]

    Goodman, M. L. 2011, ApJ, 735, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/45

    2011 doi

  11. [19]

    2017, Radio Science, 52, 132 5, doi: 10.1002/2017RS006281

    Gustafsson, M., & Ehrenborg, C. 2017, Radio Science, 52, 132 5, doi: 10.1002/2017RS006281

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    2005, Technical Report LUTEDX/(TEAT-7138)/1-16/(2005), Vol

    Gustafsson, M., & Nordebo, S. 2005, Technical Report LUTEDX/(TEAT-7138)/1-16/(2005), Vol. TEAT-7138,

    2005

  13. [21]

    1992, Nature, 360, 241, doi: 10.1038/360241a0

    Haerendel, G. 1992, Nature, 360, 241, doi: 10.1038/360241a0

    1992 doi

  14. [22]

    1983, Journal of Computational Physics, 49, 357, doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(83)90136-5

    Harten, A. 1983, Journal of Computational Physics, 49, 357, doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(83)90136-5

    1983 doi

  15. [23]

    2016, A&A, 591, A112 , doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628215

    Hillier, A., Takasao, S., & Nakamura, N. 2016, A&A, 591, A112 , doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628215

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    Hollweg, J. V. 1971, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 5155, doi: 10.1029/JA076i022p05155

    1971 doi

  17. [25]

    Huba, J. D. 2003, in Space Plasma Simulation, ed. J. B¨ uchner , C. Dum, & M. Scholer, Vol. 615 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg ), 166–192, doi: 10.1007/3-540-36530-3_9

    2003 doi

  18. [26]

    2012, ApJ, 747, 87, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/87

    Khomenko, E., & Collados, M. 2012, ApJ, 747, 87, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/87

    2012 doi

  19. [27]

    2014, Phys ics of Plasmas, 21, 092901, doi: 10.1063/1.4894106

    Khomenko, E., Collados, M., D ´ ıaz, A., & Vitas, N. 2014, Phys ics of Plasmas, 21, 092901, doi: 10.1063/1.4894106

    2014 doi

  20. [28]

    Khomenko, E., Collados, M., & D ´ ıaz, A. J. 2016, ApJ, 823, 132 , doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/132

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    Khomenko, E., Collados, M., Vitas, N., & Gonz´ alez-Morales , P. A. 2021, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 379, 20200176, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0176 Kra´ skiewicz, J., & Murawski, K. 2025, A&A, 698, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554085

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    2023, Sol

    Kraskiewicz, J., Murawski, K., Zhang, F., & Poedts, S. 2023, Sol. Phys., 298, 11, doi: 10.1007/s11207-022-02095-1

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    Kreiss, H., Oliger, J., & Committee., G. A. R. P. J. O. 1973, Methods for the approximate solution of time dependent problems, GARP publications series ; no.10 (Geneva: International Council of Scientific Unions, W orld Meteorological Organization)

    1973

  24. [32]

    1999, ApJ, 514, 493, doi: 10.1086/306930

    Kudoh, T., & Shibata, K. 1999, ApJ, 514, 493, doi: 10.1086/306930

    1999 doi

  25. [33]

    Kumar, M., Murawski, K., Kadowaki, L., Ku´ zma, B., & Kilpua, E. K. J. 2024, A&A, 681, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245638

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    2003, Sol

    Kumar, N., & Roberts, B. 2003, Sol. Phys., 214, 241, doi: 10.1023/A:1024299029918 Ku´ zma, B., W´ ojcik, D., Murawski, K., Yuan, D., & Poedts, S. 2020, A&A, 639, A45, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937260

    2003 doi

  27. [35]

    Laming, J. M. 2004, ApJ, 614, 1063, doi: 10.1086/423780 —. 2015, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 12, 2, doi: 10.1007/lrsp-2015-2

    2004 doi

  28. [36]

    E., Lukin, V

    Leake, J. E., Lukin, V. S., Linton, M. G., & Meier, E. T. 2012, ApJ, 760, 109, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/109

    2012 doi

  29. [37]

    Lighthill, M. J. 1960, Philosophical Transactions of the Ro yal Society of London Series A, 252, 397, doi: 10.1098/rsta.1960.0010

    1960 doi

  30. [38]

    G., Alvarez Laguna, A., Lani, A., & Poedts, S

    Maneva, Y. G., Alvarez Laguna, A., Lani, A., & Poedts, S. 2017 , ApJ, 836, 197, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5b83 Mart ´ ınez-G´ omez, D. 2025a, ApJ, 982, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb713 —. 2025b, Physics of Plasmas, 32, 112101, doi: 10.1063/5.0293493 Mart ´ ınez-G´ omez, D., Sol...

    2017 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    A., de Moortel, I., & Hood, A

    McLaughlin, J. A., de Moortel, I., & Hood, A. W. 2011, A&A, 527, A149, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015552

    2011 doi

  32. [40]

    T., & Shumlak, U

    Meier, E. T., & Shumlak, U. 2012, Physics of Plasmas, 19, 072508, doi: 10.1063/1.4736975

    2012 doi

  33. [41]

    1956, MNRAS, 116, 503, doi: 10.1093/mnras/116.5.503

    Mestel, L., & Spitzer, L., J. 1956, MNRAS, 116, 503, doi: 10.1093/mnras/116.5.503

    1956 doi

  34. [42]

    C., Ciolek, G

    Mouschovias, T. C., Ciolek, G. E., & Morton, S. A. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 1751, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18817.x

    2011 doi

  35. [43]

    M., et al

    Murabito, M., Stangalini, M., Laming, J. M., et al. 2024, Phys. Rev. Lett., 132, 215201, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.215201

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    2022, Ap&SS, 367, 111, doi: 10.1007/s10509-022-04152-4

    Kadowaki, L. 2022, Ap&SS, 367, 111, doi: 10.1007/s10509-022-04152-4

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    2024, A&A, 691, A25 4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449941

    Niedziela, R., Murawski, K., & Poedts, S. 2024, A&A, 691, A25 4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449941

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Osterbrock, D. E. 1961, ApJ, 134, 347, doi: 10.1086/147165

    1961 doi

  39. [47]

    Pandey, B. P. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 344, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty201

    2018 doi

  40. [48]

    P., & Dwivedi, C

    Pandey, B. P., & Dwivedi, C. B. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 3604, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2503

    2015 doi

  41. [49]

    P., & W ardle, M

    Pandey, B. P., & W ardle, M. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 2269, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12998.x —. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 1842, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1028

    2008 doi

  42. [50]

    2021, A&A, 652, A114, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141262 —

    Pelekhata, M., Murawski, K., & Poedts, S. 2021, A&A, 652, A114, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141262 —. 2023, A&A, 669, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244671

    2021 doi

  43. [51]

    Piddington, J. H. 1956, MNRAS, 116, 314, doi: 10.1093/mnras/116.3.314 Nonlinear Alfv ´ enic waves in weakly ionized plasmas 17

    1956 doi

  44. [52]

    2012, A&A, 544, A66, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219019 Popescu Braileanu, B., & Keppens, R

    Pinto, C., Verdini, A., Galli, D., & Velli, M. 2012, A&A, 544, A66, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219019 Popescu Braileanu, B., & Keppens, R. 2021, A&A, 653, A131, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140872 Popescu Braileanu, B., Lukin, V. S., Khomenko, E., & de Vicen te, ´A. 2019a, A&A, 62...

    2012 doi

  45. [53]

    Priest, E. R. 1984, Solar magneto-hydrodynamics (Dordrech t, Springer)

    1984

  46. [54]

    T., & Samson, J

    Rankin, R., Frycz, P., Tikhonchuk, V. T., & Samson, J. C. 1994 , J. Geophys. Res., 99, 21291, doi: 10.1029/94JA01629

    1994 doi

  47. [55]

    1963, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 3, 1537, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(63)90256-8

    Sarmin, E., & Chudov, L. 1963, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 3, 1537, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(63)90256-8

    1963 doi

  48. [56]

    1991, The Numerical Method of Lines: Integrat ion of Partial Differential Equations (Elsevier Science)

    Schiesser, W. 1991, The Numerical Method of Lines: Integrat ion of Partial Differential Equations (Elsevier Science). https://books.google.es/books?id=1vLFQgAACAAJ

    1991

  49. [57]

    Schunk, R. W. 1977, Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, 15, 429, doi: 10.1029/RG015i004p00429

    1977 doi

  50. [58]

    2021, A&A, 645, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039667

    Snow, B., & Hillier, A. 2021, A&A, 645, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039667

    2021 doi

  51. [59]

    2026, A&A, 708, A68, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202659417

    Soler, R. 2026, A&A, 708, A68, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202659417

    2026 doi

  52. [60]

    Soler, R., Carbonell, M., & Ballester, J. L. 2013a, ApJS, 209 , 16, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/16

    doi

  53. [61]

    L., & Terradas, J

    Soler, R., Carbonell, M., Ballester, J. L., & Terradas, J. 20 13b, ApJ, 767, 171, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/171

    doi

  54. [62]

    Soler, R., Terradas, J., Oliver, R., & Ballester, J. L. 2016, A&A, 592, A28, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628722

    2016 doi

  55. [63]

    Song, P., & Vasyli¯ unas, V. M. 2011, Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 116, A09104, doi: 10.1029/2011JA016679

    2011 doi

  56. [64]

    K., Singh, A., Singh, B., et al

    Srivastava, A. K., Singh, A., Singh, B., et al. 2024, Philoso phical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 382, 20230220, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0220

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    Stix, T. H. 1992, W aves in plasmas (New York: American Institute of Physics)

    1992

  58. [66]

    2004, ApJ, 610, 523, doi: 10.1086/421514

    Terradas, J., & Ofman, L. 2004, ApJ, 610, 523, doi: 10.1086/421514

    2004 doi

  59. [67]

    L., & Keppens, R

    Terradas, J., Oliver, R., Ballester, J. L., & Keppens, R. 200 8, ApJ, 675, 875, doi: 10.1086/526512

    doi

  60. [68]

    J., Oliver, R., & Balleste r, J

    Terradas, J., Soler, R., D ´ ıaz, A. J., Oliver, R., & Balleste r, J. L. 2013, ApJ, 778, 49, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/49

    2013 doi

  61. [69]

    F., & Araneda, J

    Terradas, J., Vi˜ nas, A. F., & Araneda, J. A. 2022, A&A, 660, A24, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141914

    2022 doi

  62. [70]

    2010, Space Sci

    Testa, P. 2010, Space Sci. Rev., 157, 37, doi: 10.1007/s11214-010-9714-3

    2010 doi

  63. [71]

    2023, ApJ, 944, 117, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb343

    Testa, P., Mart ´ ınez-Sykora, J., & De Pontieu, B. 2023, ApJ, 944, 117, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb343

    2023 doi

  64. [72]

    H., & Drake, J

    Testa, P., Saar, S. H., & Drake, J. J. 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 373, 20140259, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0259

    2015 doi

  65. [73]

    Threlfall, J. W. 2012, PhD thesis, Saint Andrews University , UK

    2012

  66. [74]

    T., Rankin, R., Frycz, P., & Samson, J

    Tikhonchuk, V. T., Rankin, R., Frycz, P., & Samson, J. C. 1995 , Physics of Plasmas, 2, 501, doi: 10.1063/1.870975

    1995 doi

  67. [75]

    To, A. S. H., Laming, J. M., Reep, J., & Finley, A. J. 2026, arXi v e-prints, arXiv:2604.13174, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.13174

    2026 doi arXiv

  68. [76]

    R., Brizard, A

    Tracy, E. R., Brizard, A. J., Richardson, A. S., & Kaufman, A. N. 2014, Ray Tracing and Beyond (Cambridge University Press)

    2014

  69. [77]

    M., & Longbottom, A

    Verwichte, E., Nakariakov, V. M., & Longbottom, A. W. 1999, Journal of Plasma Physics, 62, 219–232, doi: 10.1017/S0022377899007771 W al´ en, C. 1944, Arkiv for Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik, 3 0A, 1 W alker, A. 2004, Series in Plasma Physics, 16, doi: 10.1201/9781420034004 W ...

    1999 doi

  70. [78]

    2023, ApJ, 946, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbfb1 W atanabe, T

    Pontieu, B. 2023, ApJ, 946, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbfb1 W atanabe, T. 1961, Canadian Journal of Physics, 39, 1044, doi: 10.1139/p61-114

    2023 doi

  71. [79]

    V., Khodachenko, M

    Zaqarashvili, T. V., Khodachenko, M. L., & Rucker, H. O. 2011 a, A&A, 529, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016326 —. 2011b, A&A, 534, A93, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117380

    2011 doi

  72. [80]

    V., Khodachenko, M

    Zaqarashvili, T. V., Khodachenko, M. L., & Soler, R. 2013, A& A, 549, A113, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220272

    2013 doi

  73. [81]

    M., & Hansteen, V

    Zhang, F., Mart ´ ınez-Sykora, J., W argnier, Q. M., & Hansteen, V. H. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.05321, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.05321

    2026 doi arXiv

  74. [82]

    2016a, Phys

    Zheng, J., Chen, Y., & Yu, M. 2016a, Phys. Scr, 91, 015601, doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/91/1/015601

    doi

  75. [83]

    Zheng, J., Chen, Y., & Yu, M. Y. 2016b, Phys. Scr, 91, 035601, doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/91/3/035601

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.